AP 10-16-08
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
"Basic Services for a Complex World"
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA
Thursday, October 16, 2008
2:00 P.M.
District Board Room
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South lake Tahoe, California
Richard Solbrip, General Manager
Mary Lou Mosbacher, President
BOARD MEMBERS
Paul Sciut~,..~ssistantGeneral .Mana~er
Dale Rise, Vice President
James R. Jones, Director
Eric W. Schafer, Director
Ernie Claudio, Director
1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (Short non-agenda items that are within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the District. Five-minute limit. No action will be taken.)
3. CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR
4. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR (Any item can be discussed and considered
separately upon request)
5. CONSENT ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION I ACTION
6. PRESENTATION
a. Managers Compensation Study (Koff & Associates)
7.
ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION
a. Diamond Valley Ranch Temporary
Pg. 73 Containment Basin
(Ivo Bergsohn)
Approve Proposal from Selected
Consultant to Provide Engineering
Services in General Accordance with
the District Request for Quote (RFQ)
Dated September 30,2008
(A recommendation will be provided at the
Board meeting)
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - OCTOBER 16, 2008
PAGE - 2
b. Operations Department Hire
Pg.95 (Ross Johnson)
c. ElectricallnstrumentationlTechnician 111I
Pg.97 (Ross Johnson)
d. Twin Peaks Booster Station and Waterline
Pg. 99 Replacement
(John Thiel)
e. Payment of Claims
Pg. 125
Approve Hiring an Operator 1/111 Six
Months in Advance of an Anticipated
Opening
Authorize Hiring a Full Time
Permanent, Electricallnstrumen-
tation Technician 1/11 with the
Electrical Department to Return to
Four Person Staff through Attrition
(1) Approve the Initial Study and the
Determination of No Significant
Effect on the Environment;
(2) Authorize the Preparation of a
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative
Declaration with Submittal to the
State Clearinghouse; and
(3) Publish a Notice in the Tahoe
Tribune with Provisions for a Public
Hearing
Approve Payment in the Amount of
$978,594.10
8. BOARD MEMBER STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
(Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
a. Water & Wastewater Operations Committee (Jones 1 Claudio)
b. Finance Committee (Schafer 1 Rise)
c. Executive Committee (Mosbacher 1 Rise)
d. Planning Committee (Mosbacher 1 Schafer)
9. BOARD MEMBER AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. City of South Lake Tahoe Issues Ad Hoc Committee (Mosbacher 1 Jones)
b. Management Negotiations Ad Hoc Committee (Schafer 1 Rise)
10. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR REPRESENTATIVES REPORT
11. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
12. GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
a. Integrated Regional Water Management Plan & Proposition 84
b. Customer Appreciation re: Turf Buy Back Program
13. STAFF I ATTORNEY REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
a. City Meeting re: Construction Projects (Paul Sciuto)
b. Heavenly Resort (Paul Scuito)
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - OCTOBER 16, 2008
PAGE - 3
14. NOTICE OF PAST AND FUTURE MEETINGS I EVENTS
Past Meetings 1 Events
10108/08 - EI Dorado County Water Agency Meeting
10/13/08 - Water and Wastewater Operations Committee Meeting
10/14/08 - City of SL T Meeting
10/16/08 - Board Workshop
Future Meetings I Events
10/17/08 - 10:00 a.m. - Planning Committee Meeting: Diamond Valley Master Plan
Presentation at Turtle Rock Park
10/21/08 - 9:00 a.m. - Alpine County Supervisors Regular Board Meeting in Markleeville
11/03/08 - 3:30 p.m. - Water and Wastewater Operations Committee Meeting
11/04108 - 9:00 a.m. - Alpine County Supervisors Regular Board Meeting in Markleeville
11/06/08 - 9:00 a.m. - Emergency Practice Drill
11/06/08 - 2:00 p.m. - STPUD Regular Board Meeting
15. CLOSED SESSION (Closed Sessions are not open to the public)
a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Pg, 143 Existing Litigation re: Meyers Landfill Site: United States of America vs. EI Dorado
County and City of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action
No. S-01-1520 LKK GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of CA
16. ACTION I REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION
17. ADJOURNMENT (To the next regular meeting, November 6, 2008, 2:00 p.m.)
The South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month. A complete
agenda packet, including all backup information is available for review at the meeting and at the District office during the hours of
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A recording of the meeting is retained for 30 days after minutes of the meeting have
been approved, Items on this agenda are numbered for identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the
order in which they appear on the agenda. Designated times are for particular items only_ Public Hearings will not be called to order
prior to the time specified.
Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the agenda will be taken at the same time the agenda
items are heard; comments should be brief and directed to the specifics of the item being considered, Comments on items not on
the agenda can be heard during "Comments from the Audience;" however, action cannot be taken on items not on the agenda,
Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all written material presented at the meeting. Backup to any agenda item(s)
not included with the Board packet will be made available when finalized at the District office, at the Board meeting, and upon
request to the Clerk of the Board.
The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate participation of
the disabled in all of the District's public meetings, If particular accommodations for the disabled are needed (i.e., disability-related
aids, or other services), please contact the Clerk of the Board at 530.544.6474, extension 6203, at least 24 hours in advance of the
meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR
OCTOBER 16, 2008
ITEMS
REQUESTED ACTION
a. Identify Theft Prevention Program
Pg. 1 (Lisa Coyner)
(1) Adopt Proposed Program in
Response to, and in Compliance
with, the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transaction Act of 2003; and
(2) Enact Ordinance No. 511-08
Adding Section 2.10 to Division 2 of
the Administrative Code Regarding
the Identify Theft Prevention
Program
Extend Contract with Hauge
Brueck Associates for Consulting
Services, in the Amount of $16,640,
for a Total Amount Not to Exceed
$29,660
b. Angora Tank Replacement and Access Road
Pg. 13 (Julie Ryan)
c. Indian Creek Reservoir TMDL Mitigation
Pg.25 (Ivo Bergsohn)
(1 ) Authorize Exception to the
Bidding Procedures as Outlined in
the Purchasing Policy When the Item
is Required to be Compatible with
Other Equipment Presently On
Hand; and (2) Authorize Staff to
Purchase 984 Feet of Pump Cable
from ITT Flygt Corporation, in the
Amount of $20,993.15, Including Tax
and Freight
d. Indian Creek Reservoir Oxygenation
Pg.31 (Ivo Bergsohn)
Authorize Execution of the Utility
Line Extension Agreement
No. 08-39009-5-57 for Electric
Service to the Indian Creek
Reservoir Oxygenation System,
(Alpine County, CA), Between
Sierra Pacific Power Company and
the District for $14,790
CONSENT CALENDAR - OCTOBER 16, 2008
PAGE - 2
e.
Pg.43
Indian Creek Reservoir Oxygenation
(Ivo Bergsohn)
f. Alpine County AnnuallmpactlMitigationl
Pg. 53 Compensation
(Debbie Henderson)
g. Lynn Nolan, Grant Coordinator, Employment
Pg, 57 Contract
(Richard Solbrig, Nancy Hussmann)
h.
Pg.61
Restatement of the South Tahoe Public Utility
District Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust
(Plan)
(Paul Hughes)
i. Regular Board Meeting Minutes:
Pg.65 September 18, 2008
(Kathy Sharp)
j.
Pg.69
Regular Board Meeting Minutes:
October 2,2008
(Kathy Sharp)
(1) Approve Change Order NO.1 to
Hobbs Electric in the Amount of
$11,352.73; and (2) Add 48
Calendar Days to the Total Contract
Time
Authorize Payment of District's
Annual Mitigation Fee to Alpine
County in the Amount of $115,700
Terminate Employment Contract and
Add Limited Term Union Employee
Adopt Resolution No. 2853-08
Adding Paul Hughes, Chief Financial
Officer, and Removing Rhonda
McFarlane, Previous Chief Financial
Officer, from the Plan Trustee
Signature List
Approve Minutes
Approve Minutes
South Tahoe Public Utility District · 1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Phone 530.544.6474 · Facsimile 530.541.0614. www.stpud.us
South Tahoe
Richw'd Solbrig, General Manager
Public Utility District
Board Members
Er-nie Claudio
James R, Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Dale Rise
Eric Schafer
Memorandum
Date: October 7,2008
To: Board of Directors
From: Richard Solbrig, General Manager
Nancy Hussmann, Human Resources Director
Re: Board Presentation - October 16, 2008
Managers' Compensation Study
Koff & Associates, Inc.
On April 17, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized staff to enter into a contract with
Koff and Associates, Inc., to conduct a Compensation Study for the Management
Group. Georg Krammer and Alyssa Uchimura will be presenting their Final Report to the
Board at the October 16, 2008, Board Meeting. Final Report and all raw data
spreadsheets are attached for Board review.
Schedule of meetings with the Board Ad Hoc Committee and Management Group
representatives to begin negotiations for the 2009 contract, including discussions
regarding the Compensation Study, will be announced.
Attachments: Koff & Associates Final Report dated September 2008 and Attachments
1 through 5. Due to the length of this report, additional copies can be requested from
the Board Clerk.
South Tahoe Public Utility District. 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Phone 530.544.6474 · Facsimile 530.541.0614 · www.stpud.us
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
f)irilGror!O
Emit Claudio
,James R. JOMC6
M.llry Lou Mo!;bacht'r
D.<1le Ri6e
Eric Schafer
General M,'maqer
r:ichartl H Sol brig
1275 Meadow Creet Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 00'50
Phone 5:30 544-6474' Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Lisa Coyner, Manager of Customer Service
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Identity Theft Prevention Program
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Adopt proposed program in response to, and in
compliance with, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction (FACT) Act of 2003; and (2)
Enact Ordinance No. 511-08 adding Section 2.10 to Division 2 of the Administrative
Code regarding the Identity Theft Prevention Program.
DISCUSSION: The Federal Trade Commission's "Red Flag Rule" requires utilities
allowing customers to pay in arrears to enact, by November 1, 2008, Identity Theft
Prevention Programs that will identify "Red Flags" - patterns, practices, activities or
other signals that indicate the possible compromise of their customers' personal
information. The attached draft program complies with the Rule.
Staff also requests that the Board adopt certain changes to the Administrative Code
regarding the requirement for an Identity Theft Prevention Program in compliance with
the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACT) of 2003 and the Red Flags Rule.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: South Tahoe Public Utility District Identity Theft Prevention Program;
Ordinance No. 511-08
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO.~ :
GENERAL MANAGER: YES 112 /1.4 NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
CATEGORY: Sewer & Water
-1-
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Identity Theft Prevention Program
This program is in response to and in compliance with the
Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction (FACT) Act of 2003
and
The final rules and guidelines for the FACT Act issued by the
Federal Trade Commission and federal bank regulatory agencies
in November 2007
Adopted October 16, 2008 - Ordinance No. 511-08
-3-
Identity Theft Prevention Program
Purpose
This Program was created in order to comply with regulations issued by the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) as part of the implementation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction
(FACT) Act of 2003. The FACT Act requires that financial institutions and creditors implement
written programs which provide for detection of and response to specific activities ("red flags")
that could be related to identity theft. These programs must be in place by November 1, 2008.
The FTC regulations require that the program must:
1. Identify relevant red flags and incorporate them into the program
2. Identify ways to detect red flags
3. Include appropriate responses to red flags
4. Address new and changing risks through periodic program updates
5. Include a process for administration and oversight of the program
Identity Theft Prevention Program
-4-
page 2
PrOQram Details
Relevant Red FlaQs
Red flags are waming signs or activities that alert a creditor to potential identity theft. The
guidelines published by the FTC include 26 examples of red flags which fall into the five
categories below:
· Alerts, notifications, or other warnings received from consumer reporting agencies or
service providers
· Presentation of suspicious documents
· Presentation of suspicious personal identifying information
· Unusual use of, or other suspicious activity related to, a covered account
· Notice from customers, victims of identity theft, or law enforcement authorities
After reviewing the FTC guidelines and examples, the South Tahoe Public Utility District has
determined that the following red flags are applicable to utility and/or other accounts. These red
flags, and the appropriate responses, are the focus of this program.
· A consumer credit reporting agency reports the following in response to a credit check
request:
o Fraud or active duty alert
o Credit freeze
o The Social Security Number (SSN) is invalid or belongs to a deceased person
o The age or gender on the credit report is clearly inconsistent with information
provided by the customer
· Suspicious Documents and Activities
o Documents provided for identification appear to have been altered or forged.
o The photograph on the identification is not consistent with the physical
appearance of the customer.
o Other information on the identification is not consistent with information provided
by the customer.
o The SSN provided by the customer belongs to another customer
o The customer does not provide requested identification documents when
attempting to establish a utility account or make a payment.
o A customer refuses to provide requested proof of identity when discussing an
established utility account.
o A person other than the account holder or co-applicant requests information or
asks to make changes to an established utility account.
o An employee requests access information about an account, and the request is
inconsistent with their job duties.
Identity Theft Prevention Program
-5-
page 3
o A vendor, including a contractor, engineer or other consultant, requests that
District payments be changed with respect to address or receiver.
. A customer notifies the Customer Service Department of any of the following activities:
o Utility statements are not being received
o Unauthorized changes to a utility account
o Unauthorized charges on a utility account
o Fraudulent activity on the customer's bank account or credit card that is used to
pay utility charges
. The Customer Service Department is notified by a customer, a victim of identity theft, or
a member of law enforcement that a utilities account has been opened for a person
engaged in identity theft.
Detecting and Responding to Red Flags
RE~d flags will be detected as Customer Service Department and Accounting Department
employees interact with customers and credit reporting agencies. Any employee who becomes
aware of a suspected or actual fraudulent use of a customer or potential customer's identity
must notify the Customer Service Supervisor or Accounting Manager. An employee will be
alE~rted to these red flags during the following processes:
· Reviewing customer identification in order to establish an account, process a payment,
or enroll the customer in the automatic bank draft (ABD) program: The CSRs may be
presented with documents that appear altered or inconsistent with the information
provided by the customer.
Response: Do not establish the utility account, miscellaneous receivables account or
accept payment until the customer's identity has been confirmed.
· Answering customer inquiries on the phone. via email. and at the counter: Someone
other than the account holder or co-applicant may ask for information about a utility
account or miscellaneous receivables account or may ask to make changes to the
information on an account. A customer may also refuse to verify their identity when
asking about an account.
Response: Inform the customer that the account holder must give permission for them
to receive information about the utility account or miscellaneous receivables account.
Do not make changes to or provide any information about the account, with one
exception: if the service on the account has been interrupted for non-payment, the CSR
may provide the payment amount needed for reconnection of service.
· Answering requests from a vendor. such as a contractor. engineer or consultant. A
vendor requests that District payments for services be changed with respect to address
or receiver.
Identity Theft Prevention Program
-6-
page 4
Response: Inform the vendor that confirmation from previously authorized personnel
be obtained. Do not make changes to the payment until such confirmation is obtained.
· Processino requests from South Tahoe Public Utility District employees: Employees
may submit requests for information that are inconsistent with the rules to perform their
regular job duties.
Response: All requests for direct access to the applicable computer system are
approved by the appropriate department manager, so the Information Systems
Department should reject requests that have not received appropriate approval. All
other requests for information should be reviewed to ensure that they do not violate any
part of the Administrative Code.
· Receivino notification that there is unauthorized activity associated with a utility account
or miscellaneous receivables account: Customers may call to alert the South Tahoe
Public Utility District about fraudulent activity related to their utility account,
miscellaneous receivables account and/or the bank account used to make payments on
the account.
Response: Verify the customer's identity, and notify the Customer Service Manager or
Accounting Manager immediately. Take the appropriate actions to correct the errors on
the account, which may include:
o Issuing a service order to connect or disconnect services
o Assisting the customer with deactivation of their payment method (ABD)
o Updating personal information on the utility account
o Updating the mailing address on the utility account
o Updating account notes to document the fraudulent activity
o Adding a password to the account
o Notifying and working with law enforcement officials
· Receivino notification that a utilities account or miscellaneous receivables account has
been established for a person enoaqed in identity theft.
Response: These issues should be escalated to the Customer Service Manager or
Accounting Manager immediately. The claim will be investigated, and appropriate action
will be taken to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.
Additional procedures that help to protect aoainst identity theft include:
· Computer system access is based on the role of the user. Only certain job
classifications have access to the entire system.
· Customers may access limited information about their accounts.
Identity Theft Prevention Program
-7-
page 5
. Local law enforcement may be informed of suspected identity theft in appropriate cases.
. Adherence to the District's document security and retention policies.
. The Customer Service Department will ensure that service providers that receive and
process utility billing information have programs in place to detect and prevent identity
theft.
Identity Theft Prevention Program
-8-
page 6
Administration and Oversight of the ProQram
Customer Service Department staff is required to prepare an annual report which addresses the
effectiveness of the program, documents significant incidents involving identity theft and related
responses, provides updates related to external service providers, and includes
recommendations for material changes to the program.
The program will be reviewed at least annually and updated as needed based on the following
events:
· Experience with identity theft
· Chan9-es to the types of accounts and/or programs offered
· Implementation of new systems and/or new vendor contracts
Specific roles are as follows:
The Customer Service Supervisor will submit an annual report to the Chief Financial Officer.
The Customer Service Supervisor will also oversee the daily activities related to identity theft
detection and prevention, and ensure that all members of the Utility Division staff are trained to
detect and respond to red flags.
The Customer Service Manager will provide ongoing oversight to ensure that the program is
effective.
The Chief Financial Officer will review the annual report and approve recommended changes to
the program, both annually and on an as-needed basis.
The Board of Directors must approve the initial program.
Identity Theft Prevention Program
-9-
page 7
ORDINANCE NO. 511-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
ADDING SECTION 2.10 TO DIVISION 2 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
REGARDING IDENTITY THEFT PREVENTION
BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility
District, County ofEl Dorado, State of California, as follows:
SECTION 1 - POLICY AND PURPOSE
The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt certain changes to the Administrative
Code regarding the requirement for an Identity Theft Prevention Program in compliance
with the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACT) of2003 and the final rules
and guidelines for the FACT Act issued by the Federal Trade Commission and federal
bank regulatory agencies in November 2007.
SECTION II - DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Ordinance, the terms used herein are designed as follows:
A. The District - The South Tahoe Public Utility District.
B. The Board - The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility
District.
C. Administrative Code - The compilation and codification of all of the
Administrative, Water, Sewer, Street Lighting, Billing, Payments,
Collections and Enforcement and Groundwater Management Plan
Ordinances of the District, which establish the authority and principles for
the decisions of the District, and provide the public with guidelines to
District operations.
SECTION III - FINDINGS
The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, County of El
Dorado, State of California, make the following findings:
1. Neither the District's Administrative Code or its regulations and
procedures include measures for the prevention of identity theft;
-10-
2. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requires the creation of an identity
theft prevention program to comply with the implementation of the Fair and Accurate
Credit Transaction (FACT) Act of2003. The FACT Act requires that financial
institutions and creditors implement written programs which provide for detection of and
response to specific activities ("red flags") that could be related to identity theft.
3. Identity theft prevention programs must be in place by November 1,2008.
4. District staff have developed an Identity Theft Prevention Program that is
tailored to the District's operations and meets the FACT requirements.
5. The Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the District and
its customers to adopt this ordinance with respect to the establishment of an identity theft
prevention program.
SECTION IV - ADD SECTION 2.10 TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
"2.10 Identity Theft Prevention Program. Federal Trade Commission regulations
require that the District maintain an Identity Theft Prevention Program, consisting of
guidelines established to alert the District to potential identity theft and respond to
specific activities ("red flags") that could be related to identity theft. The District has
adopted and will maintain a program that complies with the FTC regulations."
SECTION V - SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance and its implementing rules and regulations is for any reason held to be
unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance or the Administrative Code. The Board of Directors declares
and determines that it would have passed section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof of this Ordinance and its implementing rules and
regulations and the Administrative Code irrespective of the fact that anyone or more
sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be
determined to be unconstitutional or invalid.
SECTION VI - EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance adding the above referenced section to the Administrative Code
shall be effective November 15, 2008.
Ordinance No. 511-08
Identity Theft Prevention Program
Page 2
-11-
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility
District at its duly held regular meeting on the 16th day of October, 2008 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mary Lou Mosbacher, President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
ATTEST:
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board
Ordinance NO.5] ] -08
Identity Theft Prevention Program
Page 3
-12-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Ernie Claudio
JamcB R. ,Jones
M3ry Lou Mo~b}jchar
Oak Rbc
Eric Schafe-r
Genu,.1 M,mi,gcr
Rk;h,ar,1 '1. :~.(libriq
Di-rectOrf1
1275 Meadow Cret>t Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474' Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4b
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Julie Ryan, Senior Engineer
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Angora Tank Replacement and Access Road
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Extend contract with Hauge Brueck Associates
(HBA) for consulting services, in the amount of $16,640, for a total amount not to
exceed $29,660.
DISCUSSION: Since January 2008, HBA has been assisting staff with environmental
documentation services for the replacement and upsizing of Angora Tank, and
construction of an access road to the tank, under existing Task Order 3A. The scope of
work under Task 3A assumed a low level of effort would be required to perform the
environmental documentation. However, the initial study of the project identified a
potential cultural resource along the proposed access road alignment, and a more
rigorous environmental documentation effort will be required to address it. The attached
scope of work from HBA provides a description of the original scope of work and the
new work items. Staff recommends that the Board extend the District's contract with
HBA to perform the additional environmental documentation services. HBA's scope of
work, cost estimate, and schedule for completion of services is attached. This work will
be completed as an extension to the existing task order.
SCHEDULE: January 2008 to October 2009
COSTS: $29,660
ACCOUNT NO: 2029-7064/ANGOTK
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $743,396
ATTACHMENTS: Cost Estimate/Angora Tank and Access Environmental Doc.
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES--11J1L NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-13-
CATEGORY: Water
I-IAUG!;: BRU!;:CK
ASSOCIATfS
www.haugebrueck.com
CAllJ:ORNIA
P 916,283,5800
F 916-313-3445
2233 Wall Avenue, Suite 295
Sacramento, CA 95825
NfVADA
P 775-588-4700
F 775-588,4704
P,O, Box 1029t
310 Oorla Court, Suite 209
Zephyr Cove, NV 89448
October 8, 2008
Ms. Julie Ryan
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
RE: Revised Scope of Work and Budget for the Angora Tank Replacement
Project NEPA (Environmental Assessment), CEQA (Initial Study/Negative
Declaration), and TRP A (Initial Environmental Checklist) Environmental
Documentation
Dear Ms. Ryan:
Thank you for providing Hauge Brueck Associates (HBA) with the
opportunity to support the District's environmental and permitting
requirements for the Angora Tank Replacement Project. Based on the
determination by the USFS L TBMU that an Environmental Assessment is
required for the proposed project, I have prepared an amendment to the
existing Task Order 3A scope and budget for the Angora Replacement
Project.
In order to prepare the scope of work provided below, the following
assumptions have been made:
· An Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/Neg Dec) will be the
appropriate CEQA document;
· The IS/Neg Dec will encompass a discussion of the tank and access
roadway and land use issues associated with construction of the
roadway on USFS Santini-Burton land because these two projects are
connected actions;
· An Environmental Assessment (EA) will be the appropriate USFS
document. The ISlNeg Dec will be written with enough detail to
support a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) by the USFS and
will include analyses required by the TRP A Initial Environmental
Checklist;
· The District will prepare permit applications and pay associated filing
fees;
-15-
Ms, Julic Ryan
Octobcr X 200X
Page 2
· Site plans and other project mapping will be prepared by the District
and provided to HBA in suitable format for use in the environmental
document;
· The project will be located on District-owned and USFS L TBMU
lands and will cross a small portion of California Tahoe Conservancy
land;
· HBA will rely on existing wildlife surveys conducted by the L TBMU
to document presence/absence of California spotted owl and northern
goshawk in the project vicinity;
· HBA will rely on existing plant surveys conducted by the L TBMU to
document presence/absence of sensitive plant species in the project
vicinity;
· The District will provide HBA with the final project description to be
used for the environmental analysis; and
· A Biological Evaluation will be prepared by L TBMU staff.
Scope of Work
Task I - Review Background Information, Prepare Project Description and Project
Meetings with Agency Staff
Hauge Brueck Associates (HBA) will visit the site, collect available background information
about the site vicinity from the District, and review environmental documents and/or survey
documents prepared for other projects in the immediate vicinity. HBA will obtain base maps and
a general description of the proposed action from the District, and shall prepare a project
description that is of adequate detail for use in the Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/Neg
Dee). During the course of preparing the environmental documentation, up to five (5) meetings
will be attended by HBA's project manager to discuss the project with District and USFS staff to
ensure adequacy of the analysis and to discuss and resolve potential issues. Prior to preparation
of Task 2, HBA shall work with the District and USPS to prepare a scoping letter for distribution
to adjacent property owners and other interested stakeholders. If desired by the USFS, HBA will
also participate in a scoping meeting with interested persons. Scoping of the proposed action is
required for the USPS Environmental Assessment and will be summarized in the environmental
document.
Task 2 - Prepare Initial Study/Negative Declaration and Environmental Assessment
HBA shall use the description of the project prepared in Task I to prepare the Administrative
Draft rS/Neg Dec/Environmental Assessment (EA). The Administrative Draft IS/Neg Dec/EA
shall include:
· A detailed description of the proposed action;
· The location of the project;
· Purpose and Need for the proposed action;
· Alternatives to the proposed action;
· A list of agencies and persons consulted (summary of the scoping process);
· A proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment;
-16-
Ms. Julie Ryan
October 8 2008
Page 3
· Analysis in an ISlNeg Dec/EA documenting reasons to support the finding (note: the
Initial Study analysis will be modified as necessary to support an USFS FONSI and will
include TRP A Initial Environmental Checklist and CA Department of Health Services
environmental criteria so it can be used by TRPA and CA DHS to support their permit
applications );
· Analysis of direct and indirect impacts to known resources that may occur as a result of
project implementation; and
· Mitigation measures and/or design features, if any, that will be included in the project to
avoid potentially significant effects.
The completed Administrative Draft IS/Neg Dec/EA will be prepared by HBA for review by the
District, TRP A and USFS. Issues that are anticipated to be addressed in detail include water
quality/erosion, grading, land coverage, vegetation and biological resources, short-term
construction noise, scenic resources (including height), cultural resources and access. Following
one round of revisions by the District, TRP A and USFS, HBA shall produce the IS/Neg Dec/EA
and circulate the CEQA document to the State Office of Planning and Research and other
interested agencies and members of the public for a total of30 days.
Task 3 - Final Environmental Documentation
Following the CEQA circulation of the ISlNeg Dec/EA, a Final Environmental Documentation
package will be prepared and taken to the STPUD Board for approval. Once the Board has
approved the project, a Notice of Determination shall be prepared and sent to the EI Dorado
County Clerks office for 30-day posting. The filing of a Notice of Determination starts a 30-day
statute of limitations on court challenges to the District's approval under CEQA. HBA will also
coordinate with the EI Dorado County Clerks office on the District's submittal of wildlife impact
(de minimus) fees.
Assuming there will be no significant impacts to identified resources, the USFS will prepare a
FONSI and prepare a Decision Notice. Following issuance of a Decision Notice by the USFS, a
45 day appeal period is required before implementation can commence. At this time, the Final
Environmental Documentation package will be submitted to the TRP A to support their
permitting process.
Task 4 - Cultural Resources Evaluation
Based on a request of USFS staff, Susan Lindstrom will perfonn an evaluation of the existing
historic roadway that is located on the USFS property. This evaluation is being conducted to
determine whether the roadway resource is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places. The evaluation will also be utilized to determine whether the proposed project
will result in significant impacts to the resource and will support conclusions in the
environmental documentation. A detai led scope of work and budget estimate from Susan
Lindstrom is provided as Attachment A.
-17-
Ms, Julie Ryan
October 8 2008
Page 4
Schedule
These revised tasks will be completed within 29 weeks of receipt of the final project description
and mapping from the District.
· Authorization to Proceed
· Kick off Meeting with District
· Finalize Project Description
· Develop Alternatives
· Public Scoping
· Prepare Admin Draft IS/Ncg Dec/EA
· Agency Review of Admin Draft ISlNeg Dec/EA
· Revise ISlNeg Dec/EA
· Circulate IS/Neg Dec (30 days)
· Prepare Admin Final Package
· District Review of Admin Final Package
· Prepare Final Environmental Documentation
· Board Approval- File NOD
· Submit Final Documentation to USFS/TRP A
· TRPA Hearings
· USFS Decision Memo
· USFS Appeal Period (45 days)
Estimated Budget
Complete
Complete
To Be Detennined
2 weeks
2 weeks
4 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
4 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
I week
3 weeks
I week
4 weeks
4 weeks
7 weeks
The estimated work effort for each task is provided below. Tasks will be completed by Garth
Alling (Project Manager and senior scientist), Rob Brueck (QA/QC and Manager), and Katie
Patton/Katrina Lynch (administrative support). HBA schedule of hourly rates are attached.
Task Hours/Rate Cost
Task I - Review Background Infonnation!Prepare 40 at $110 $4,400
Project Description! Attend meetings (5) 4 at $170 $680
Task 2 - Prepare Initial StudylNegative Declaration 110 at $110 $12,100
8 at $170 $1,360
10 at $50 $500
Task 3 - Final Environmental Documentation 15 at $110 $1,650
4 at $170 $680
10 at $50 $500
Task 4 ~ Cultural Resources Evaluation $6,790
Direct Costs (mileage, printing, etc.) $1,000
Total Estimated Costs $29,660
-18-
Ms, Julie Ryan
October 8 2008
Page 6
I-IAUGI;: BRUbCK
ASSOCIATl:tS
2008 Rate Schedule
CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
CLERICAL $45
Ap'~~I~J:~.ifON m.~,_~_~~O
I ASSISTANT 1::I.'-:~t-.lr-lERlSCIEN"l"l3r..~" . $65
I CAD/GIS,_, m~ 'm_~_-+~m~'-=-= $75__, . . -1
'F.'!c!'~.I'J~_~~.~E:!,,!'ST. : $90
SENIOR PLANNER/SCIENTIST $110
AsSOCIATE PLANNER/SCIENTIST $135
PRI!:"C1PAl ~~~NNER/SCIENTIST~m'_m_m_~_~' $15~6- mmm
,..~~~~~~'3 mmm ~.~~m.:=,.m.Iffo ...
HOURLY BILLING RATES INCLUDE lABOR AND OVERHEAD SUCH AS OFFICE SPACE, MISCElANEOUS OFFICE
SUPPLIES, COMPUTERS, OFFICE PHONES AND FAX, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS,
MILEAGE BILLED AT INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE RATES (CURRENTLY $0.485/MILE).
OTHER APPROVED DIRECT COSTS (E.G,. PRINTING, TRAVEL AND SUBCONTRACTORS) ARE BILLED AT
COST PLUS 10%.
-20-
Susan Lindstrom, Ph.D.
Consulting Archaeologist
P.O. Box 3324
Truckee CA 96160
530-587-7072 voice
530-587-7083 fax
sHnd stro m@cebridge.net
DATE:
September 25,2008
TO:
Garth Alling
Hauge Brueck Associates
310 DorIa Court, Suite 209
Zephyr Cove, NV 89448
775-588-4700 (588-4704 fax)
galling@haugebrueck.com
RE:
STPUD Angora Tank and Access Road
Heritage Resource Study Cost Proposal
Background and Authority
This memo is to serve as a project scope and cost for a heritage resource study on
behalf of the South Tahoe Public Utilities District (STPUD) for a project involving the
re-building of an existing water tank and the construction of a new access road extending
for approximately 700 feet. The project is located within the Angora Highlands
Subdivision on Angora Ridge in South Lake Tahoe (EI Dorado County). The access
roadway crosses land under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Unit (L TBMU) and will impact approximately 200 linear feet
of a known archaeological site in that road paving and widening are proposed. Site rs-
05-19-911 consists of a historic road segment. USFS heritage staff requires an
archaeological inventory and re-recordation of this heritage resources and a significance
evaluation to ascertain National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility and a
determination of project impacts. Additional archaeological survey is also required on an
approximate half acre of adjoining private lands on which portions of the new access road
and new water tank are proposed.
Heritage resource studies are customarily perfonned in a series of phases, each one
building upon infonnation gained from the prior study. Each of these phases is generally
performed under separately negotiated contracts.
INVENTORY: First, archival research and an archaeological field reconnaissance
are performed to inventory and record known heritage resources and potential
project constraints.
EV ALUA TION: If a heritage property may be subject to project-related impacts, its
significance is evaluated. For significant resources, a determination of project
impacts is assessed and detailed measures to mitigate impacts are proposed. If
-22-
project redesign to avoid impacts is unfeasible, then mitigation measures must be
developed and implemented in order to recover the significant information contained
within these heritage properties prior to project ground disturbance activities.
IMPACT MITIGATION AND DATA RECOVERY: A final phase may involve the
implementation of mitigation measures recommended during the prior evaluation
phase. Mitigation, or data recovery, typically involves additional archival research,
field excavation, photo documentation, mapping, archaeological monitorirg, etc.
Methods
Prefield research will entail an updated literature review of prehistoric and historic
themes for the project area. This will include a review of prior archaeological research and
of pertinent published and unpublished literature. In order to identify any properties listed
on the National Register, California Register and/or other local listings, the required records
search at the USFS and the North Central Infonnation Center (NCIC) at California State
University, Sacramento (CSUS) will be conducted.
An effort will be made to examine the entire project are by conducting an intensive
surface survey and walking parallel transects at no greater than IS-meter (50-foot) intervals.
The final report will provide a summary of pre field research and present the findings
of the field survey, detailing the sampling strategy and stating the methods employed. The
segment of historic roadbed known to be located within the project area (Site FS-05-l9-911)
will be re-visited and an updated archaeological site recorded will be prepared. This road
segment will be evaluated and a determination of eligibility to the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) and a determination of project effect will be prepared. General
measures to mitigate any potential project impacts to the road will be developed, if
appropriate. Should mitigation measures be required, their implementation is an optional
task that is not covered in this proposal. Findings of this heritage resource study will be
subject to review by the USFS and the California State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO).
The project scope and cost are itemized below and are based upon the encounter
of no additional archaeological artifacts, features or sites apart from the known historic
road segment (l~S-05-l9-911). In the event that additional heritage resources are
encountered, and based upon their size and complexity, the project scope and cost may
need to be revised. As proposed, the total contract cost is $6,790.00.
-23-
STPUD ANGORA TANK AND ACCESS ROAD
HERITAGE RESOURCE STUDY
COST PROPOSAL
Task *Title Hrs $/Hr Cost
I. Project management/agency consultation PA 2 120 240.00
II. Prefield research
-USFS records search (federal land) PA 4 120 480.00
-NCIC records search (private land) 350.00
III. Field survey and field site recording (05-19-911) PA 8 120 960.00
IV. Site record preparation (05-19-911) PA 6 120 720.00
V. Heritage resource evaluation (05-19-911)/
contextual background/determination of impact PA 8 120 960.00
VI. Final Report PA 24 120 2,880.00
VII. Expenses
-mileage (I RT Truckee(-+SL T: 100 mi@50~/mi) 50.00
-misc. (report production, mailing, supplies, etc.) 150.00
TOTAL: $ 6,790.00
-24-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Direct:.or0
Emle Claudio
James R. Jone!'?
Mary Lou Motiil:>acher
Dale Ri€>e
Eric echafer
O/H1tt'al Manager
Rich~~rd H. Solbriq
1275 Meadow Crevt Drive' South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4c
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Indian Creek Reservoir (ICR) TMDL Mitigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Authorize exception to the bidding procedures as
outlined in the Purchasing Policy when the item is required to be compatible with other
equipment presently on hand; (2) Authorize staff to purchase 984 feet of pump cable
from ITT Flygt Corporation, in the amount of $20,993.15, including tax and freight.
DISCUSSION: In September 2008, the District purchased a NT 3127 MT submersible
pump and 7.5 Hp motor from ITT Flygt Corporation for the ICR Oxygenation Project.
Selection of the submersible pump and motor set is based on calculated discharge and
head requirements for the feeder pump and recommended pump vendor information
presented in the Brown and CaldwelllCR Oxygenation Pre-design Technical
Memorandum No.1 (September, 2007).
District staff contacted local suppliers to provide a quote for submersible cable
compatible with the selected submersible pump and motor set. Local suppliers informed
staff that this is a specialty product and recommended that the District purchase the
required cable directly from the pump manufacturer. The District's Purchasing Policy
includes certain instances in which the requirements of bidding may be dispensed with if
decided by the Board of Directors. Item 2 of the Exceptions to Bidding includes
instances "When the item is required or is economically preferable to match or be
compatible with other furnishings, materials or equipment presently on hand and the
purchase is made from the manufacturer or supplier who supplied other such
furnishings, materials or equipment."
District staff believes that authorization for the purchase of the submersible cable (#6
SUBCAB AWG/3-2-1-GC) from ITT Flygt Corporation meets the match or be compatible
conditions of the exceptions to bidding contained in the Purchasing Policy.
-25-
Ivo Bergsohn
October 16, 2008
Page 2
The District's Purchasing Agent has reviewed this agenda item.
SCHEDULE: Anticipated delivery on or about November 15, 2008
COSTS: $20,993.15, including tax and freight
ACCOUNT NO: 1029-8605/1CTMDL
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $473,907
ATTACHMENTS: ITT Quote (dated 10107/08)
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES 4?-H./ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~6~O
CATEGORY: Sewer
.J l , , f ' L \.1 ',,' V : \1 'h' ,'j IVI
1 I: r Ll'J I
I~ 0, V 0 J 0 r . I
f; I TT
/TT Water & Wastewater US-A.
Flygc Products
October 7, 2008
790-A Chadboume Rd
Fairfield. CA 94534
Tel (707) 422-9894
Fax (707) 422-9808
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTI LIlY DISTRICT
1 27S MEADOW CREST DR
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA 96150
Ann: Mr. Ivo Bergsohn via fax (530) 541-4319
Re: Indian Creek Reservoir - Cable Reel
Flygt Corporation is pleased to provide a quote for the following equipment.
Pumps & Accessories
Qty Description
984' CABLE,SUBCAB AWG 6/3-2-1-GC (300 Meter Reel)
1 EI Dorado County Sales Tax (7.75%)
Extended Price
$ 19,483.20
$ 1,509.95
Total Project Price
$ 20,993.15
Terms of Payment: Net 30 Days. IlT Flygt Corporation's Standard Warranty and Terms and Conditions will a.pply
(copies attached)
Time of Delivery: Approx, 4-5 weeks after receipt of approved purchase order.
Taxes; EI Dorado County Sales Tax of 7.75% is included In this quotatIon.
FOB: FOB Factory with freight allowed to jobsite, unloadIng by others.
Tl!.rms of Delivery: Freight Prepaid
Sincerely.
,/J.=; V I,..t.x..-=
Peter V. Galati"
Sales Representative
Phone: 707-422-9894 ext.615
pete.galati@itt.com
F~
Page 1 of 1
\,1 I.. ~. " L"J\. V I~" TV -1'1
l'l I '!--11,.4 1
I~'J, VV.JV
L
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
lIT WATER & WASTEWATER U.S.A.
FL VGT PRODUCTS
DESIGNATED AS "SELLER"
Notwithslandlng any Inconsistent. additional or diffe(ont terms contained in your purchase order or other documentG supplied by you, this acceptance is
expressly conditioned upon your agreement to the toll owing terms and cond"lons.
1. PrlcGs apply to the specirtc quantnleS 6tated 011 this order, and do not include any taxes, transportation charges, prlnls, special packaging or
stampinn nol6/J6cllled on tha order. Prices are subject to change withoUt notice.
2. Taxes: Unless prohibited by slaMa, Purchassr agrees to pay to Seller the amount ot any Federal, Slate, City or other tax which Seller may be
required to pay on account of the manufaoturer, transportation. sala or USll of the material which is the subject of tills contract. In lieu of paying such
taxes to Seller, SuYal' may furnish Seller with a Tax Exemption Certlflcate or Certlt1cates acceptable to appropriate taXing authon'ties. al :my time prior to
Seller's shipment of the product".
a. Quanlfty Discounts: Ouantity discounts are computed separately for oach item or on combination of Items as Seller may desIgnata and such
discounts are based on the quantltlos ordered and or released at anyone time. II an ordor Is canceled, discounts will be adjusted to the dIscount
allowablfl for the unconcealed quantity, It any.
4. 16l'ms: The Seller reserves the right to require paymeht In advance or C.O.D. and otherwise modify credfl terms should Buyer's credit
standing not meet Seller's acceptance. Interast may be charged at the highest rale of Interest allowablo In too Slate of manufacturer's office to which
thIs ardor has been submitted on all accounts not paid whan due. Buyer shall not assign or transfer this centract or any Interest in it, or monies paYable
under it, withootthe wrftten consent of Seller and any asslgnmanl made without such consenl shall be null and void,
5. Delivery; NI shlpment dates are after receipt and acceptance or on:Jer by Seller (IncludIng approved slbmittals if applicable). If any conditions
occur unforeseen at time of acceptance by Seller which prevants compliance with delivery schedUles. Selle( shall nol be liable lor damages. general,
conseql.wntJaJ or otherwise, or for failure to give notice of <lny delay.
6. Risk of Loss: NI shipments wUl be mado F.O.B. selling factory or Distnbulion Gallter unlass otharwlse spocltled. The Seller (or seller's ~enl)
will solod the carrier for shipment. Title to and risk of 10lili fO( the material shall pass to the Purchaser upon deltver)' thereol by tho Seller to the carrier or
delivery service. Thll(ellpOO, the Purchaser shall be responsible therefore. All matsrtal is sold F.O.B. shipping point and title and risk of loss passes to
the Buyer on delivery to the common camel' at shipping point. (a) Claim for damage or loss should b6 filed with carrier by Buyer, (b) O(der for
replacement material must be a new purchase order and will be handled as such. subject to l.i1andard "terms and conditions of sale', including freight
charges.
7. Warranty; lIT Wator and Wastewater U.S.A.lFlygt Products offers a Commercial Warranty covering Parts and Labor on its pumps to the
origInal End Purchaser. in compliance with requlrements of the FL YGT Products Catalog and T oohnlcal Manual Spoclflcallons for pumfing MuniCipal
Wastawater or similar abrasive (roo. noncorrosive liquids agaInst defects in workmanship and material for the period as defined below.
FL YaT PRODUCTS Pump Models ara warranted from the date of shipment from lIT Water & Wastewater U.S.AJFlygt Products to the End Purchaser
through the period defined on the appropriate Product Warranty Policy. FLYGT Products will pay the share of the replacement parts costs and labO(
deflnad on the appropriate Product Warranty provIded the pump with cable attached, is returned to an FLVGT PRODUCTS SERVICE FACILOY for
repairs.
TIme after shipment (monlhs or houn;) shall be determined by date of receipt 01 detective product (or Warranty Claim) by FL YGT PRODUCTS
Authorized Rllpalr Facility andlor current copy 01 Maintenance *TIme Operated" report from job site.
Start-up reports and electr1ca1 syslBm schematics (including BiOs of Material) may be requIred to support any Warranty Claims; THEY WILL NORMALLY
BE REOUIRED FOR CLAIMS FOR PUMPS 1 B HORSEPOWER AND GREATER. This Warranty shall not apply to any product or pan of product which
has been subjected to misuse, negligence. aco/dent, operated In dotted portion of published curves, used in 8 manner contrary 10 FL VGT PRODUCT'S
printed InstllJ(;1lons, or damaQed due to a defeclive power supply', Improper 91ec.trlcal protection or faulty installation or repair.
ITT Watll( and Wastewater U.S.A.lFlygt Product's sole obligation under this Warranty shall be to Repair, Replaoe or Grant. a Credit Reimbursement at its
dlsaetlon, through Its Warranty Prooe6sing PrOO6dures tor detec.tlva products when returned prepaid to FI.YGT Products and upon FLYGT Product's
exclusive examination found to be defective. Products repaired or replaced under this Warranty will be returned freight prepaid.
tIT Water and Wastewater U.S.AJFL VGT Products neIther assumes nor autllorize6 any person Of company to assume for It, any other obligation in
connacUon with the sale of its equipment. Any enla(gement or modIfication 01 this Warranty by a RepresentatiVe or OthB( Sell1ng Agent shall bGcome his
exclusive reoponslblllty,
ITT WATER AND WASTEWAlf;R/FLYGT PRODUCTS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES, RENTED EQUIPMENT,
OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR'S FEES, OR UNAUTHORIZED REPAIR SHOP EXPENSES. THE WARRANTIES MADE HEREIN BY ITT WATER AND
WASTEWATERIFL YGT PRODUCTS ARE IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AND THE IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. m WATER
AND WABTEWATER U.S.A-1Ft. YGT PRODUCTS ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR LOSS OF USE OR FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND IN RESPECT TO THE USE OR OPERATION OF lIT WATER AND WASlEWATER U.SA./FLVGT
PRODUCTS, OR ANY EQUIPMENT OR ACCESSORIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
B. Inspection: Buyer shall have the right to Inspect the Products prior to payment and acceptance and It Buyer's Inspactlon reveals any defects
in the Products, Buyer shall notify the Seller within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Products of any claim Buyer might have concerning sUch defects In
the Products disoovered by Buyer. Buyer's failure to notify Seller within sucI1 thlrty-d<\y period &hall constitute a waiver by Buyer of all claims coverIng
such defects in the Products.
Page 1 of2
-28-.
un,
. L!) Vb, I U : if ! i",!VI
III rLllll
No. IJdjb
r, j.'
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
lIT WATER & WASTEWATER U.S.A.
FL YGT PRODUCTS
DESIGNATED AS "SELLER"
9. Seller's Liabillly: Seller will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost of repair. incide'ntal or consequential damages of any kind, whether based
upon warranty, contract or negligence, ahd arlslng in connection with the sale, use or repair 01 the Products. Seller's maxlmum liability shall nol in any
case exceed !he contract price lor lhe Product& claImed to be defective or unSO'itable.
10. Delays: Seller will not be liable for any delay in the performance or orders or contracts. or in the delivery or shipment of goods or for any
damages suffered by Buyer by reason of such delay. If such delay is, directly or Indirectly caused by, or in any manner arises from fires, Ooods,
accidents, riots, acts of God, war, governmenlal interference or embargoes, strike5. labor dlfflctdlles, shortages of rabor, fool, power, materials, or
supplIes, transportation delays, or any other cause or causes (whether or not similar in nature to any of these hereinbefore specified) beyond 1\5 control,
the delivery dale shall automatically be extended by such delay, All orden; or contracts are accepted with the understanding that they are subject to
SeUer's abIlity fo obtain the necessary materials and all orders or contracts as well a5 shipments applicable thereto are subJact to Seller's current plant
schedules. governmental regulations, orders. directives and restrictions that may be in effect from time to Ume.
11. Default or Delay in Payment If Buyer falls or delays making payment on any order or contract of sale between Buyer and Seller as required
by Ihe terms of Ihat order or hereunder. then eoyer agrees !hat Seller may defer shipnent under Ihis C{)nlracl, or 0.1 Seller's option may cancel
unshipped product balances, until paymenl(s) by Seller is brought to a currenl status, Seller's rights In this respect are addltionalto other rights and
retnocllas available to Seller for Buyer'S breach of this or any other agreement. Applcation of Buyer's Paymenw: Saller may apply any payments made
by Buyer or credl1s dUG to Buyer to any amounts owed by Buyer to Seller, as Seller mOlY In lIs sole discretion determine and without regard to Buyer's
instruclio05 in thIs regard or to comrnercial practice. it any. governIng the manner in Which payments are to be applied.
12. Tools, etc.: Unless otnerwlse expressly provided, the Seller shall retain title to and possessIon of any models, patters, dies, molds, jigs,
fooures and tools made lor or obtained for the fUl'hlshlng of this order.
13. Cancellations: Seller's acceptance of order, cancellalion or order reduction requests is OOfldilloned upon receiving Buyer's written agreement
to assume tennlnation charges.
14. Minimllm ()(der: Saller reserves the right to refuse to accept any order which does flot meet quanlity requirements which Seller may establish
tor any glvGn product or group of pl"oducts.
15. Quality Levels: Prloes are based on Quality levels commrlnsurate with normal prOOOGSing. It a different Quality level is required, Buyer must
spet=/fy his requirements and pay any additional costs that may be applicable.
16_ Errors; Seller raserves the right to correct clerical or stenographic errors or omissions.
11. Palent Indemnity:
(a) Patent Indemnity by Seller to Buyer: The Seller agree6 to Indemnify and hold harmless the Buyer from all damages, legal el<p60se6 and
costs finally assessed against Buyer in any aelion for Infringement of any United States Letters Pat9l1t by the items delivered hereunder, provided that
Buyer shall give Seller prompt wrtUen notice of any action, c1a1tn or threat of patenl infringement suite, and shall give Seller opportunity to elect to take
over, settle or defend any sucf1 claim or action through counsel of his own cholce. If the use of any 5Uro item or any pan thereof should be enjoined.
Seller shall have the right at its own elq}ense to procure for Buyer the right 10 continue using such item, or to replace said item with a non-infringing
item, or to modify said 1t9Cl1 so that il becomes flon-Infrlnglng. The foregoing provisions as to patent protection from Seller to purchaser shall not apply to
any Item manufactured to the design or specifications furnished by Buyer.
(b) Patoot Indemnity by Buyer to Seller: II the items delivered hereunder are manufactured pursuant to detailed desIgns furnIshed by Buyer.
Buyer shall indemnify and hold harmless the Seller from all ]egal axpenses. which may be incurred as well as all damages and costs whIch may finally
be assessed against the SeUer In any action for infringement of any Un/tGd StatGS Letters Patent by such Items dGllvsred hereunder. The SeliEIf' agrees
promptly to Infonn the Buyer of any claim for liability made against the SellGr with raspect to such ilems and the Seller agrQBS 10 cooperale with the
buyer in every way reasonably available to facllltale the defense 8{lainst any such claim.
1 B. Fair Labor Standards Act: Seller certifies that p(oducts tllmlshed hereunder have been or will be prodUC9d In compliance w1th the Fair Labor
Standards Act, as amended, and regulallons and orders of the United States Department of Labor issued lhereunder. Seller agrees that this statement
may be considered as Ihe written assurance contemplated by the October 26, 1949 arnendmoot 10 said Acl
19. Acceplar1Qe Required to Foml ContraCl: Unless and vntll a tormal wrttten acceptance upon a printed order acknowledgment foflT1 Is sent by
Seller to the Buyer, no order will becoma effecllve as a valid conlract binding upon Saller.
20. Entire Contract~ The provisions hereon and on accompanying papers. if any. constitute all of the terms and condilions agreed upon by the
parties and shall replace and super&ede any provisions on the face and reverse side of the purchase order of any attachment thereto, or any prlor
general agreement inco05istent with the provisions hereof. No modlficatlon hereof shall be valid unless In writing and duly signed by a person
authorized by Seller. The provisions hereof shall not be modIfied by any uS3{le of trade or any course of prior dealing or acquiescence In any course of
per1ormance.
21. GovOO1lng Laws: The terms of this agreement and all rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by the laws of lhe State of Seller's
office 10 which this order has been submilled.
Page 20f2
-29-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Director!>
Emit' Claudio
Jllt11e!\ R. JOMB
Mary LOll Moob.acher
Dale Riu
Eric Schafer
C,rntral ~v~l.Inilqer
f<icha"c' H. Soibrig
1275 Meadow Cre6t Drive' South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 . Fax 550 541-0014
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4d
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Indian Creek Reservoir Oxygenation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize execution of the Utility Line Extension
Agreement # 08-39009-5-57 for electric service to the Indian Creek Reservoir
Oxygenation System, (Alpine County, CA), between SPPCo. (Sierra Pacific Power
Company) and the District for $14,790.
DISCUSSION: The District is requesting a utility line extension from SPPCo. to power
the equipment building and oxygenation system for this project. The total cost to provide
the requested service to the equipment building is $15,790, less a $1,000 previously
paid engineering advance.
SCHEDULE: As soon as possible
COSTS: $14,790
ACCOUNT NO: 1029-8605/1CTMDL
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $473,907
ATTACHMENTS: SPPCo. Line Extension Agreement #08-39009-5-57
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES IIGHI NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-31-
CATEGORY: Sewer
:, "
1 :, ", ~ r .;'
-',\
Sierra Pacific'
~ll'r rapa( i ti,~.\. ni I!
875 Las! Long Strt"t"l, Carson City. Nevada 89706. 775.o.H.2900
September 18, 2008
STPUD
Alln: Ivo Bergsohn
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Re: Electric Facilities, Indian Creek Reservoir-Alpine Co
SPPCo. Project #08~39009-5-57
Dear Mr. Bergsohn:
The enclosed agreement and construction drawings (Exhibit IIAII), outline
costs/ installation responsibilities to provide electric service to the above-referenced project.
.AlSGenclosed is the Grant of F.asement documents with Notice of Final Description for your
signature. If the proposal meets with your approvat please sign the agreement and return it
with your advance due of $14,790.00 to this office to my attention. The advance due is the total
of Line 18 of the Utility Facility Agreement.
The agreement is pursuant to Sierra Pacific's rules and regulations filed and approved
by the Public Utility Commission of California. A copy of these rules is available upon request.
Work performed by you on this project will be done in accordance with SPPCo.
standard specifications and in compliance with OSHA requirements and the governing local
jurisdiction.
The agreement constitutes a contract regarding installation costs for the requested
service. As such, it requires the signature of a person legally authorized to obligate to a
contract. Please ensure that the name and title of the person signing the contract are dearly
printed or typed on the lines immediately following the signature. Confusion regarding the
authority of tlle person signing tlle contract may result in a delay to the slart of the installation.
A copy of the executed agreement will be returned to YOll for your files.
The terms and conditions of this proposal shall be finn for 90 days from the date of tilis
letter, at which lime they will be subject to dlan.ge. Construction must also commence within 90
days from the date the agreement is signed. If a contract is not negotiated within 6 months from
the date of this letter, your project wiD be canceled.
This agreement is contingent upon SPPCo. receiving the appropriate governmental
approvals, all necessary easements, rights-of-way, or other documents essential to the
-33-
STPUD
September 18, 2008
Page 2
placement, installation of the utility facility. All rights-of-way shall be obtained without cost to
Sierra Pacific.
Per Rule 2, Section C-3a, "Loads connected to a service shall have sufficient protective
devices, installed and maintained at the customer's expense, to prevent damage to equipment
during routine conditions that may include sudden loss of voltage, sudden re-energizatioll,
opening of one or more phases, and voltage or current fluctuations or variations",
In an effort to provide expeditious service to your project, we request that you return,
together with the contract agreement and your Grant of Easement, all addresses for your
project. This will ensure that once we receive city j county approvals, our field personnel will be
able to set your meter(s) at the earliest possible time.
Please visit our website at www.sierrapaciIic.com/services/business/ construction
for further information.
If you require additional information, please contact this office at 834-2903.
Sincerely,
~7.J~
Donald E. French
Sr. Utility Design Administrator
DEF jbjr
Enclosure
-34-
~/~
Sierra Pacific'"
UTILITY'S LINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT
Planner Donald E French
Phone # (775) 834-2903
Agreement # 08-39009-5-57
This Agreement is entered into this day of 20_ by and between SIERRA
PACIFIC POWER COMPANY ("Sierra"), A Nevada corporation, P.O, Box 10100, Reno, Nevada. 89520 and
STPUD ("Applicant"). Applicant desires
electric service for two unit(s) at the following location(s): INDIAN CREEK RESERVOIR,
ALPINE COUNTY CA 96120 hereinafter referred to as
("Project"), To provide the requested service, it is necessary for Sierra to extend and/or modify its facilities as
described in the Utility Design Drawing(s) attached hereto.
Now therefore, it is agreed by and between the Parties as follows:
I.
A. APPLICANT'S REFUNDABLE & NON-REFUNDABLE COST RESPONSIBILITY, APPLICANT CREDITS AND BASE DATA:
UNE# [E)mJPTlGJ TOfAL
"----
R:FUN:>AB.E
1- CD\lSTRLCllCN carr (ExdJdrg TrerdY&lbstn.dure) 14,702
2 <D\ISTRLCllQ\J .AL~ ._C1~
3. lOTAL Ra:1..NDPaE roST SUBJECT TO TM 13.134
4. TAX UPBU lY ex UNE 3 2,233
5. N::N- T,AXllRE REFlND.AaE (RerroIa of Existirg Padities) d36
6. lOTAL SUBJECT TO REFLND (Ures 3 + 4 + 5) 15,633
N:l'I-RRJNo.\aE
7. N::N- TAXAaE CO)T (JdJOrda") 0
a trn- TAXAaE carr CF RBtDVPl 0
9. N:N-FtFUNOOLE carr SUBJECT TO TAX 120
10. TAXU.A8UlYCFUNE9 20
11. TAX UflBUlY Q\J CXNTRlBJTID FAOUllES
(Trff'Ch/Sbsrudlre) (Lire25) 17
12. lOTALNQ\J.RER..NDIa.E (Lires 7 +8 +9+ 10 +11) 157
13. lOTAL.APAJCJlNT roST (Liles 6 + 12) J5,79q_
.6PPUCmr CImTS
14, ,AfAJ C6NT INST.ALLID CQ\()lJIT (Resicertia 5 cr rrore unls) 0
15. .AFAJ CIWT INST.ALlID F/lCIUllES 0
CM:RSZIDFPOUllES -- --- 0
16,
17, SER\ACE RBrvBLRSl3\.I18-.JlS 0
18. lOTAL.APAJCANr CREDlTS (Ures 14 +15+ 16) 0
19, SlBTOf,ltL (U nes 13 + 18) 15,790
Z), LESS ffiBA a..GLY PAl DE f\G fffRNGAD/AN:E (1,000)
21. PDV.ANCEI<R8JlT OLE 14,790
Bc\SE DATA l.5EDI NCALCUAT1GJS
22. TAXU.A8UlY FflCfffi 17.0%
23. ffiJ.ECTID fiNNLAL RE\itN.E $ .jfgJJ.
24. FeJENJE MUL llRE 25
25. V/IlUE a= CCNTRSUfID F/lCIUl1 ES 101
-35-
II.
TOTAL COST (Section I, Line 1 plus Lines 6 & 7)
The total cost for which Applicant is liable, shall be Sierra Pacific's estimated cost, refundable and non-refundable, to
provide the requested service. Sierra's estimate includes all costs associated with prOViding the requested service
hereunder and shall include all regulatory, environmental and other fees, engineering, inspection, material, labor,
transportation, costs for removal of existing facilities less their salvage value, associated overheads and other charges
which are related to the installation or alteration of the required facilities,
III.
TOTAL ADVANCE/CREDIT DUE (Section I, Line 16)
A. Applicant agrees to pay Sierra Pacific's total estimated cost for which the Applicant is liable (Section I, Line 1 plus
Lines 6 & 7),
ll~ss any applicable free allowance (Section I, Line 2) as determined by Sierra Pacific for the Project
Plus Tax Liability (Section I. Lines 4, 8, & 9).
Loss the estimated cost of the facilities, provided and installed by Applicant, inclusive of facilities oversized at Sierra's
request (Section I, Lines 12 & 13).
Less the estimated cost of the service(s) provided by Applicant, that is Sierra Pacific's cost responsibility (Section I,
Line 14), This cost will be adjusted to actual installed footages upon project completion, and Applicant will be billed
or refunded the difference.
Applicant agrees to pay, at the time of the execution of this Agreement, the amount(s) set forth hereunder (Section I,
Line 16) or to provide an acceptable surety bond or letter of credit. The bond or letter of credit is to be replaced with cash
not less than thirty (30) days prior to construction. However, the cost of materials not normally stocked by Sierra Pacific in
the type and quantity required shall be paid for in cash, prior to the ordering of such materials.
If the total due (Section I. Line 16) IS a credit due Applicant, Sierra requires that a performance bond for that amount,
plus Sierra's project costs and the federal tax credit, be collected prior to issuing a check Applicant may elect to take
payment upon completion and acceptance of the installation of the facilities and eliminate the requirement for a
performance bond,
B. If the total estimated cost of construction to extend the line(s) and/or main(s) to the project exceeds $5,000, the cash
advance/credit in Section I, Line 16 will be adjusted to reflect Sierra Pacific's actual cost of construction. The adjustment is
limited to that portion of the total cost of the main/line extension pertaining to facilities installed by Sierra Pacific. The cost
of those facilities installed by Applicant will not be adjusted. Sierra Pacific shall review its actual cost of construction within
four (4) months of completion of said facilities and shall either bill or refund Applicant the difference between the total
estimated cash advance/credit and the adjusted cash advance/credit If such adjustment results in an increased total cash
advance requirement, Applicant agrees to pay Sierra Pacific such difference within thirty (30) days of written notice,
C, If at any time after twelve (12) months following the date of this Agreement there has been no construction activity on
the electric facilities by the Applicant for a period of six (6) months, Sierra Pacific shall not be held to the provisions of this
Agreement. Sierra Pacific may return all advanced dollars not required to cover Sierra Pacific's expenditures on the
project To reinstate the project, a new Agreement will be required with updated costs,
IV.
FREE ALLOWANCES
Thl3 free allowance is calculated on the projected annual revenue and the revenue multiples in Section I, Lines 18 &
19. The projected annual revenue will include only the revenue from monthly billings for basic service, excluding balancing
account adjustments, late charges, and tax adjustments. Should actual revenues fall substantially short of the projected
revenue used for the free allowance granted, the customer may be required to pay to Sierra Pacific in cash any portion of
the free allowance granted but not justified by actual revenues, Such payment will be increased by the tax liability factor.
II ...-' . .\:, .'1 __r- = ,'-
-36-
V.
REFUNDS (Section I, Line 5)
A. ELECTRIC EXTENSIONS
1, All advances and/or contributions made by Applicant under the provisions of this Agreement, which are not
classified as a non-refundable by Sierra Pacific, shall be subject to refund, to the party or parties entitled thereto as set
forth in this section,
(a) Except as indicated in Section VA 1 (b) of this Agreement, all refunds shall be made without interest
(b) Refunds based on estimated usage levels shall be paid by the utility within ninety (90) days of the date service is
initiated. In the event that refunds are not paid in accordance with this section, Sierra Pacific shall pay interest for
the period the refund is delayed at the rate currently specified in Section 704.655 of NRS.
(c) Refunds hereunder shall be made for new customer connections during the period not to exceed ten (10) years
after the date of this Agreement.
(d) Except for refunds from customer connections made within ten (10) years of the date of this Agreement, any
portion of the advance which remains unrefunded ten (10) years after the date of this Agreement, will be forfeited by
Applicant and become the property of Sierra Pacific,
2, Refunding will be based on revenues in excess of the level used as the basis for determining free allowance,
derived from the following customers, who initiate service within ten (10) years of the date of this Agreement.
(a) Those served directly from the subject extension or alteration, as long as subject extension or alteration is the
first in a series from the original point of supply for which a portion of an advance remains refundable,
(b) Those served from subsequent extensions of or additions to the original extension. Refunds based on revenues
in this section shall be made to the Applicant having the first extension in series from the original point of supply, for
which a portion of an advance remains refundable,
3, The following provisions apply to the refunding process
(a) In those cases where two or more parties make a joint advance/contribution on the same extension, Sierra
Pacific shall distribute refundable amounts to such parties in the same proportion as their individual
advance/contribution bear to the joint refundable total, unless otherwise directed by all parties,
(b) Refundable amounts may be accumulated before refunding to twenty-five dollars ($25.00) minimum or to a total
refundable balance if less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
(c) The total amount refunded hereunder shall not exceed the total amount subject to refund (Section I, Line 5),
VI.
TAX GROSS UP
All applicable Applicant costs, cost adjustments and refunds will be increased to reflect the appropriate tax liability
factor indicated in Section I, Line 17.
VII.
MISCELLANEOUS
A This Agreement has been made by Sierra Pacific pursuant to its rules and regulations governing all matters contained
herein, filed with and approved by the Public Service Commission of California, and this Agreement is subject to any
changes or modifications by the Public Service Commission of California as said Commission may from time to time
direct in the exercise of its jurisdiction,
-37-
B All facilities constructed hereunder shall become property owned, maintained, and controlled by Sierra Pacific.
C The parties agree and understand that Applicant is not in any way an agent, representative, employee, or contractor of
Sierra Pacific during the installation of facilities required hereunder. and Applicant agrees to indemnify and save
harmless Sierra Pacific from any and all claims which are a result of, or arise out of, construction activities including,
but not limited to, trenching and backfill undertaken by Applicant in accordance with this Agreement.
D, Applicant agrees that it will grant, or if not the owner, represents that the owner will grant and execute, to and in favor of
Sierra Pacific, all necessary easements, conveyances, deeds, rights-of-way, or other documents required or relating in
any faction to the placement. installation, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of facilities required
hereunder or any portion thereof.
If any portion of said facilities will be located on property other than that owned by Applicant. Sierra Pacific shall not be
obligated to commence construction unless and until permanent rights-of-way therefore are granted to Sierra Pacific
that are satisfactory to Sierra Pacific both as to location of easement and form document. All rights-of-way shall be
obtained without cost to Sierra Pacific,
E, M facilities installed by Applicant shall be in accordance with Sierra Pacific Construction Standards, as contained in the
"Electric Distribution System Guide," and details as shown on the work order drawings, and applicable local. state, and
federal laws and/or regulations,
F. All! work performed and all material furnished by the Applicant and his contractor shall be guaranteed against defects in
materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year following final acceptance of work by Sierra Pacific. Applicant
agrees that Sierra Pacific may, at its option and upon written notice to Applicant, either (1) repair any defect in materials
or workmanship which may develop during the one-year period, or (2) require Applicant to make good any defect in
materials or workmanship which may develop during said one-year period, The option and obligation to repair shall
extend to any damage to facilities or work caused by the subject defects in materials or workmanship or the repairing of
same All repairs hereunder, whether undertaken by Sierra Pacific or Applicant, shall be done solely at Applicant's
expense,
Applicant also assumes all responsibilities and liabilities for ten (10) years for facilities installed by the Applicant or
facilities installed by Sierra Pacific based on survey and staking provided by the Applicant or Applicant's engineer that
are found to be located outside the recorded easement or right-of-way granted for such facilities.
G. For Applicant installation of facilities in addition to those normally provided at no expense to Sierra Pacific:
1. Applicant shall provide public liability and property damage insurance coverage in amounts satisfactory to Sierra
Pacific and naming Sierra Pacific as an additional insured,
2, Applicant shall provide worker's compensation and unemployment compensation insurance in the form and
amounts required by the State of California,
3. Applicant shall perform in accordance with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, standards. and codes applicable
to the types of installation being undertaken,
H Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless Sierra Pacific from and against Applicant's failure to conform in any
respect to the requirements set forth in Sections E and F above
I Applicant may assign its right to receive a refund under this Agreement only upon written notification of the assignment
to Sierra Pacific. Written notification shall consist of a document transferring the right to receive refunds, signed and
notarized by the Assignor and the Assignee. Sierra Pacific may refuse to accept an assignment that is not signed and
notarized by the Assignor and the Assignee. No obligation or duty owed by the Applicant to Sierra Pacific may be
assigned unless Sierra Pacific consents to such assignment in writing, Under no circumstances shall Sierra Pacific be
liable under any contract between the Applicant or Assignor and any Assignee,
. ',-~.'.
-38-
J, Notices or inquiries concerning this Agreement should be directed to
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
Alto: Line Extensions
PO Box 10100
Reno, NV 89520
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto execute this Agreement (Pages 1 through 6 inclusive plus Exhibit A) the
day and year first above written
APPLlCANT(S)
STPUD
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
By:
Printedffyped
Name:
By:
Typed Name:
Title:
John James Perra
Area Service Manager
Designer
Signature
PrintedlTyped
Name:
Mailing Address: 1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Tax Identification Number (Required)
(Individual) Social Security Number
(Business) TIN
Bus. Type: Corporation
Tax Exempt _
Governmental Agency
NOTE: We request your Tax Identification Number and nature of
your organization, Due to IRS regulations and under certain
situations. if we do not have this information. we are required
to withhold 20% of any refund due you
Partnership _
Other
Please be advised that we have selected
as our Applicant Installed Contractor.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - 08-39009-5-57
-39-
~
NORTH
P_I ~ 4- 'W /
\ .,. ~=- Z7L - - - - - - -
\\ i-j .20t 1"11 _ _ _ -IP'jf-I1J,CSII ·
)/11/ i / ~~ fC4"= ,C ~~~~~-:C= ~~
Ii! i i i ~I' t.~~'~];~ ~>
! ! I il,. i ,': i i i . .- -- - ---
I! i i //!/ /, ,: II '
i ill i//i ii ,I
~ 11 Iii / i! i I
]! Iii !III
'iliji; Hil/
'il I, "
SCALE: ,"=50'
["-Tl/X:) D-';:Y6 ~ YOU DI6 ]
l ~'USA ,=-,
1-800-221-2600
NOTE:
SymbQU are not to .caJe and
do Dot neoeu.rUT rep.re..nt
the actual locatJon. 01 SPPCo
I. emU...
."~.R
- ....
, '
l
"
INDWI C1/flX
RfSfR\IlIR
SP 11'
NEUT .'
PHONE 23'
~
POLE TREE
-40-
I( IlL SPfU1C47)ONS: PfR SPPC S1tI. SUB-DIX;
V (1.'). CIftISHCD GIM\of1. (2.2). ,..,7M (l,J)
11'""--
1 ),. I :.""~
jl , PO< OIHCR U7WY
OR ~~ Af fOJ' CONP.
~ l SN<D 8IoCKFIU
.~
~
SERVIFlr.JFNCH
~---_.-
SPPCo TO FURNISH AND/OR INSTAll
1 Approx. 270 ckt. ft. of 1 phase olh primary conductor c/o 2-12ocsr.
2 Approx. 50 ckt. ft. (100 cbl ft) of u/g service cable to 0 400 amp panel c/o 1-35OtK in
Ic4" (conduit by contractor) (CT's required)
J One (1) 45 It wood pole
.. One (1) anchor c/o ,.. rod and 20' lead cia JIB" E.H.S down guy.
S Stand-of( brackets and screw logs for risers.
GENERAL COMMENTS
A CoIl the Corson office (BJ4-2gn) -48 hours in advance for all trench inspections before
covering trenches, Service cable w", not be install8d without service trench inspection.
B All meter locations must be approved by SPPCO. Meter panels 400 amps and IofTJer must
be approved by SPPCo meter dept. Enclosed meter ponels must be remote metered or
hove direct occess to the o4Jtside approved by SPPCO. All metering must meet SPPCo
requirement per applicable SPPCo stds GMOOOr".. MCOOO 1M, SBOOOJM and GIOOO4U.
C All material ,hall be on the job site prior to the start of any work done by SPPCo.
o Refer to SPPCo std. CIOOO1M for further clarification of details.
All work shaH be occomplis~d in strict accordonce with the specifications set forth in the
E/~ctric Distribution Guido. Vol. 17, os currently adopted by SPPCo. These standards can
be viewed and\or downloaded from the Sierra Pacific webs-ite at the fof/owing web address
hftp:/ /www.sierrapacific.comjservices/businftsslconstrvction.
SOURCE: 1254 LINE '2,5 KV
NORM OUT OF PINfNUT SUB
SEE w.P 1254-0\H-4
A VICIN!Jr MAP
--
!
/~f;
r
r~ "',.,.. CflW<
) ) RfSflMJR
'-.'C
WO(XJf"OROS
4'
~
Preliminary
Not for Construction
~Q!iT.
')
<fI
',~
-41-
'~LLE
o .tt1!'ll;f~..;;
II i l'I'Il!!
III' ii' 1II1 i'.I~
I 1'1'
III' II i I
III I III
I! I
I I
I I
I III
. I II
I H11:TT"
I n~
I "
I 'I' ~
I I
Ifl!
If
f; f I
i ~b'
;; ~~
8 ,.,
~ ~
s i
i~ [~
II .. @
._-
h
{
HI
h.
u~
e~6
ll:!:!
i
~l r~ ~Iif It
~~ ;1 ~~.a J1
;. I[ ;i~
Oz
~o
~~~~
g6-o~
() ~~
I
L
2: ~
'" ....
t<:l ~ ~
- :<:
- C1l (')
'" (') '" ~
- c+ '"
., ",
.... ""
(') '"
", ~
Vl
Genuai Manaqu
~:ich,srd H. Solbri~
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
D,r~ctor-e
Ernie Claudio
JamM R. Jone1!
Mary Lou MOfll1ac.he'r
OaleRil'>e
E;.rlc Schafer
1275 Meadow Creat Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4e
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Indian Creek Reservoir (ICR) Oxygenation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve Change Order NO.1 to Hobbs Electric in
the amount of $11 ,352.73; and (2) Add 48 calendar days to the total contract time.
DISCUSSION: The itemized parts of Change Order NO.1 are as follows:
Item 1, in the amount of $2,550.00, is for added time required to readjust the electrical
conduit and panel layout to accommodate the electrical housekeeping pad and relocate
lighting switches and receptacles. The dimensions and footprint of the electrical
housekeeping pad were not included in the original contract plans.
Item 2, in the amount of $8,991.73, is to special build a 72-inch low profile M-900
service switchboard and adds forty-eight (48) calendar days to the total contract time to
accommodate fabrication and delivery of the equipment. To meet acceptable height
requirements, the switchboard must fit within the opening to the service entrance door,
which were not included in the original contract plans. The service switchboard as bid
was for a 90-inch switchboard. A special build 72-inch switchboard is required to meet
acceptable height requirements.
Item 3, in the credit amount of <$189.00>, is to omit the utility transformer pad as
indicated on the Site Plan (sheet 2 of 18). Sierra Pacific Power Company plans to install
a 25kva overhead transformer to serve the equipment building removing the need for
the transformer pad.
-43-
Ivo Bergsohn
October 16, 2008
Page 2
SCHEDULE: As soon as possible
COSTS: $11,352.73
ACCOUNT NO: 1029-8605/1CTMDL
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $473,907
ATTACHMENTS: Change Order No.1
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES If+i/ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-44-
CATEGORY: Sewer
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1
Project INDIAN CREEK RESERVOIR (lCR) OXYGENATION
Contractor HOBBS ELECTRIC
Date 10.16.2008
PO # P20564
The Contract Shall Be Changed As Follows:
1) Increase $2,550.00 to field adjust the electrical conduit for the Building Main Panel CBP-
900; Control Building Panel CBP-910 and Motor Control Panel MCP-900 to accommodate
the electrical housekeeping pad and relocate lighting switches and receptacles. The
increase includes all added costs for conduit installation as per Hobbs Cost Estimate #1
revised (09/25/08). (Attachment A).
TOTAL FOR ITEM 1: $2,550.00
2) Increase $8,991.73 to special build a 72-inch low profile M-900 service switchboard and
add 48 Calendar Days to the total contract time to accommodate the total time required for
fabrication and delivery of the equipment. The increase includes all added material costs
and subcontractor mark-up, as per Hobbs Cost Estimate #2 (09/22/08). (Attachment B).
TOTAL FOR ITEM 2: $8,991.73
3) Decrease $189.00 to omit the transformer pad indicated on the Site Plan (sheet 2 of 18),
as directed in the District reply to RFI #002 (8/25/08). The decrease represents the total
material credit for the transformer pad (Attachment C).
TOTAL FOR ITEM 3: ($189.00)
TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, ITEMS 1- 31S:
$11,352.73
I Oollar Amounts Contract Time I
Original Contract $115,000.00
Previous Change Order $0.00
Current Contract $115,000.00 105 Calendar Days
THIS CHANGE ORDER $11,352.73 48 Calendar Days
New Contract Total $126,352.73 153 Calendar Days
Contractor agrees to make the herein-described changes In accordance with the terms hereof. The change
In contract price and/or contract time noted Is full settlement for costs incurred as a result of the change(s)
described, unless specifically noted in Individual descrlptlon(s).
Date:
Authorized By STPUD Board President
Date:
Accepted By Contractor
Date:
Reviewed By
-45-
J.,~,.; ;
, '::.. .:.:,.,\j .,!'
Ivo Bergsohn
From: Will Hobbs [hobbselectric@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 25,2008 9;47 AM
To: Ivo Bergsohn
Cc: Heidi Donovan
Subject: Cost Estimate # 1 revised
Attachments: Cost Estimate #1 (REV).xls
Good Monring Heidi & r va,
Pagel-ofl
~
A~ll\\:.l\lT
1\
I have attaehed cost est. #1 revised. I have removed the following costs as per your request:
1) All costs: associated with material mobilization.
2) All costs associated with equip. rental.
3) All costs related to materials.
Hopefully this will be sufficient, ifnot please contact me for any further issues.
Thank You,
Will Hobbs
Hobbs Electric
Owner
Mobile (619) 454-4420
Office (760) 787-9346
FAX (760) 440-0749
9/25/2008
-46-
Cost Estimate #1 I Oxygenatio
Summary Of Work
Relocate CBP 900, CBP 910, & MCP
900 /UPS conduits In order to accommodate
housekeeping pad and 4" stubs.
Relocate conduit for lighting switches and
receptacles. Coordinate with STPUD employees
In order to eliminate any conflict in layout or
design. Make all corrections identified.
Contractor
Hobbs Electric
Prepared by: Will Hobbs
Description
Mobilize materials
Equipment Rental Generator
Equipment Rental Truck
Materials
Conduit Support
Conduit Installation
Coordination & Layout
Tax
Estimated Total
Markup
Grand Total
- .__ _—
Extended Cost .�.-. ,..
QTY.
Unit
Man, Hrs.
Mat. Unit
Cost
Equip. Unit
Cost
Labor Rate
Labor Cost
Mat. Cost
Equip. Cost
Grand Total
hours
0
days
lays
LF
8
hours
8
85
680
12
hours
12
85
1020
4
hours
4
85
340
2040
25%
25%
25%
$ 2,550.00
$ 2,550.00
Cost Estimate #1 I Oxygenatio
Summary Of Work
Relocate CBP 900, CBP 910, & MCP
900 /UPS conduits In order to accommodate
housekeeping pad and 4" stubs.
Relocate conduit for lighting switches and
receptacles. Coordinate with STPUD employees
In order to eliminate any conflict in layout or
design. Make all corrections identified.
Contractor
Hobbs Electric
Prepared by: Will Hobbs
Description
Mobilize materials
Equipment Rental Generator
Equipment Rental Truck
Materials
Conduit Support
Conduit Installation
Coordination & Layout
Tax
Estimated Total
Markup
Grand Total
'~ .~\.. '.
~M\:.N.T
15
Ivo Bergsohn
IIydro-CJeologjst
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Dear Ivo:
Please review the attached cost estimate for change order #2 as well as the attached
correspondence related to switchboard height.
Please allow for additional cost in the amount of$8991.73. Additional contract time in
the amount of six weeks will also be necessary due to the change in design. The contract
completion date shall be January 6, 2009.
Please note delays in this projecCcould adversely affect production. AB per NECA
Manual of Labor Units Page 5 Section C (Extremes of Weather) once the temperature
including wind chill drops below 35 F, production will be affected thus resulting in
additional cost related to delays.
""
Sincerely,
Will Hobbs
Owner
-48-
Summary Of Work
Extended
QTY.
Unit
Man. Hrs.
_
Mat. Unit
Cost
Equip. Unit
Cost
Labor Rate
_
Labor Cost
Cost
Mat. Cost
Equip. Cost
_
Grand Total
glace 90" SWBD with 72" SWBD in order to
meet engineers requirements.
_
Contractor
_
S
Hobbs Electric
Prepared by: Will Hobbs
_
Description
Mobilize materials
Equipment Rental Generator
Equipment Rental Truck
Supplies
Conduit Support
Conduit Installation
Coordination & Layout
Tax
Estimated Total
Markup
Grand Total
S
1
$6,676
0.08%
517.39
X7493
7,193.39
25%
_
1,798.34
$8,991.73
Ivo Bergsohn
1\~ft(;.NT
C-
From: Will Hobbs [hobbselectric@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday. September 26. 2008 7:36 AM
To: Ivo Bergsohn
Cc: Heidi Donovan; Jimmie Hoggatt
Subject: Re: Draft Change Order No. 1 Items
Ivo,
The credit for the 3421 transformer pad is $189.00. This quote was obtained from San Diego Pre Cast. .--
Thank You,
Will Hobbs
Hobbs Electric
Owner
Mobile (619) 454-4420
Office (760) 787-9346
FAX (760) 440-0749
--- On Tue, 9/23/08, Ivo Bergsohn <lbergsohn@$tpud.dst.ca.us>wrote:
From: Ivo Bergsohn <Ibergsohn@Stpuddst.ca.us>
Subject: Draft Change Order No.1 Items
To; hobbselectric@Sbcglobal.net
Cc: "Heidi Donovan" <hdonovan@stpud.dst.ca.us>, "Jimmie Hoggatt" <jhoggatt@stpud.dst.ca.us>
Date; Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 10;44 AM
Will;
I'm in the process of developing Change Order NO.1 for the ICR Oxygenation Project. According to my file, there are
three items that could be included in Change Order NO.1:
. pca #001 - Cost Estimate NO.1 (see attached memo requesting a revised estlmate);
. PCO#002 - Cost Estimate NO.2 plus time extension to accommodate added time required for fabrication of the
service switchboard M-900; and
. Malerial credit for omission of transformer pad (please provide material credit estimate as per response to RFI
#002).
Please provide me the revised Cost Estimate NO.1 and Mi1tcrial Credit for the transf.:.rmer pad, so I can complc~.s eel
#1.
10/3/2008
-50-
I
1
<- '
, ','
~. \~
Page 2 of2
Thanks,
Ivo Bergsohn. P.G., C.Hg.
Hydro-Geologist
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
530.543.6204
530.541.4319 (fax)
10/3/2008
-51-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Dire:ct.(}t~
Emit Claudio
Jametl R. .JaMt>
Mary Lou M06b.llcher
Dale RJIM
Ene Schafer
General Manager
~~ic ha rd H 501 brig
1275 MBadow CrB6t Drive · South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Phone 530 544~6474 · Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4f
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Debbie Henderson, Accounting Manager
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Alpine County AnnuallmpactlMitigation/Compensation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize payment of District's annual mitigation fee
to Alpine County in the amount of $115,700.
DISCUSSION: The second amendment to the agreement between the District and the
County of Alpine, dated June 2, 1983, provides for an annual payment to compensate
for and mitigate the impacts of Harvey Place Dam Project. The current year obligation is
$115,700. This represents the $115,800 paid in fiscal year 2007/2008 decreased by the
percentage decrease in the District's sewer system connections from October 1 , 2007
to September 30, 2008.
SCHEDULE: Amount due is indicated on this meeting's payment of claims.
COSTS: $115,700
ACCOUNT NO: 1028-6650
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $155,000
ATTACHMENTS: Alpine County Mitigation Fee Report
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES rflfIJ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-53-
CATEGORY: Sewer
DATE SEWER UT MITIGATION ROUNDED in sewer units in dollars
11 -1 -89 74,855 100,000 100,000
11 -1 -90 75,722 101,158 101,200 867 $1,200
11 -1 -91 76,451 102,132 102,100 729 $942
10 -26 -92 76,976 102,833 102,800 525 $668
10 -31 -93 77,495 103,527 103,500 519 $667
10 -31 -94 78,808 105,281 105,300 1,313 $1,773
11 -1 -95 78,231 104,510 104,500 -577 ($781)
11 -1 -96 78,777 105,239 105,200 546 $690
11 -1 -97 79,235 105,851 105,900 458 $661
11 -1 -98 79,906 106,748 106,700 671 $849
10 -06 -99 80,367 107,364 107,400 461 $652
cn
10 -19 -00 80,890 108,062 108,000 523 $636
10 -18 -01 81,268 108,567 108,600 378 $538
12 -5 -02 81,948 109,476 109,500 680 $933
10/16/03 83,699 111,815 111,800 1,751 $2,324
10/21/04 84,423 112,782 112,800 724 $985
10/20/05 85,038 113,604 113,600 615 $818
10/19/06 85,962 114,838 114,800 924 $1,196
10/18/07 86,658 115,768 115,800 696 $962
10/16/08 86,602 115,693 115,700 -56 ($68)
Please issue a check to Alpine County in the amount of $115,700 for their annual
impact/mitigation /compensation fee. Based on 86,602 sewer units. This is provided for
in the Second Amendment to Agreement between STPUD and the County of Alpine and
the Alpine County Water Agency dated June 2, 1983 (Ref 1D(5)).
Account 1028 -6650
ALPINE COUNTY MITIGATION FEE
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
DifllCt,of6
Ernie Claudio
.James R. Jone"
Mary Lou MOfiP.acttl'lr
DalcRi!'>e
Eric Schafer
Genual Manal3u
Richard H. Solbriq
1275 Meadow Crefit Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · fax 550 541-0014
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 49
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Richard Solbrig, General Manager
Nancy Hussmann, Human Resources Director
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Lynn Nolan Employment Contract
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Terminate Employment Contract and add Limited
Term Union Employee.
DISCUSSION: After discussion between the District, Union, and Lynn Nolan (contract
employee), it was agreed that the Grant Coordinator position should be a Union
represented position, and that Lynn Nolan should be classified as a Limited Term
Employee. Previously, partial funding for the position from outside agency(s) was
problematic for the Union as far as making it a Union position. That issue has been
resolved with the Union and with Lynn Nolan.
With the Board action above, since Lynn Nolan will be classified as a Limited Term
Union Employee, her Employment Contract with the District needs to be terminated.
The Letter of Agreement, outlining the terms of this change has been signed by the
Union.
SCHEDULE: October 17, 2008 - Add union dues to payroll deduction field.
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Agreement
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES /R.H-I NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
CATEGORY: General
-57-
Letter of Agreement
Between
South Tahoe Public Utility District
And
Stationary Engineers, Local 39
The District currently retains a Limited Term Contract employee as its Grant
Coordinator. Effective October 16, 2008, the District shall terminate its contract with
Lynn Nolan, Grant Coordinator. This Letter of Agreement outlines the terms of Lynn's
continued employment with the South Tahoe Public Utility District.
1. Effective October 16, 2008, the Grant Coordinator will become a Full Time,
Limited Term, Union employee.
2. The duration of the Limited Term employment shall continue through June,
2010, at which time the District may review the ability to retain the Grant
Coordinator.
3. As a Full-Time Limited Term, Union employee, the District reserves the right
to contract out the Grant Coordinator to share in a partnership with other
outside agencies who may also desire a part-time Grant Coordinator. Such
inter-agency agreements shall not affect the employment relationship
between Nolan and the District. STPUD shall remain Nolan's sole employer.
STPUD shall be reimbursed for Nolan's time subject to the terms of the inter-
agency agreement.
4. If the inter-agency Agreement is terminated, the District's Grant Coordinator
will continue as a Full Time, Limited Term Union employee through the June,
2010 date noted above.
5. For the duration of this Agreement, the salary for the Grant Coordinator will
be the same range as that of Preventive Maintenance Coordinator II, currently
$4558.79 - $6414.67 per month. Lynn Nolan will be placed at the top step of
the range, and her Union dues will be the same as a current regular, full time
union employee at the same pay range.
Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager
Date
Patrick Clark, Business Representative
Date
-59-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Directors
Ernie Claudio
,James R. ,JoM$
Mary' Lou MOl>b.llcher
Dale RJ~
Eric Schafer
Geneml Mtlna~er
f<lchard H So!britj
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 . Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4h
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Paul Hughes, Chief Financial Officer
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Restatement of the South Tahoe Public Utility District
Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust (Plan)
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Adopt Resolution 2853-08 adding Paul Hughes, Chief
Financial Officer, and removing Rhonda McFarlane, previous Chief Financial Officer,
from the Plan Trustee signature list.
DISCUSSION: The Plan restatement is necessary to transfer the Trustee signature
authority of the previous Chief Financial Officer of the District, to the current Chief
Financial Officer of the District. No other changes are proposed to the Plan.
The Plan Document is available for review upon request.
SCHEDULE: Restatement effective October 16, 2008.
COSTS: NI A
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2853-08
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO
CATEGORY: General
-61-
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6 WHEREAS, the South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) has employees
RESOLUTION NO. 2853-08
RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
TO AMEND THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
7 rendering valuable services; and
8 WHEREAS, the District has established the South Tahoe Public Utility District
9 Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust (Plan) a deferred compensation plan for District
10 employees that serves the interest of the District by enabling it to provide reasonable
11 retirement security for its employees, and by assisting in the attraction and retention of
12 competent personnel; and
13 WHEREAS, a restatement of the Plan document to amend the Trustee signature
14 authority is deemed to be in the best interests of Plan participants;
15 NOW THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTH TAHOE
16 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT HEREBY RESOLVES that Paul Hughes, Chief Financial
17 Officer is added as a Plan Trustee, and Rhonda McFarlane, previous Chief Financial
Officer is removed as a Plan Trustee.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 ATTEST:
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted and passed by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe
Public Utility District at a regularly scheduled meeting held on the 16th day of October,
2008, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mary Lou Mosbacher, Board President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board
-63-
,:'!/,lTfJ l1.ft
1i""i"'O",.~
b !'t,;j ~ 0:' ;,: ',:','7' !f.," :a.
/lJt:f '*'." .,~- ". i!v,.
... OI>~: ,t' I"" i,
. "/kJ
TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
UBasic Services for a Complex World"
,~i.c~~rd ,~~I~~,i,~,.~~~~ral ,M~~~~~~, """"."., ", ".""m H"" ',.'H' ,0 '"
Mary Lou Mosbacher, President BOARD MEMBERS
,~~ul ,~ci~:~~,"~s~i,:,~a,nt , ~:~~~:r.
Dale Rise, Vice President
James R, Jones, Director Eric W. Schafer, Director
,,' ",__",.,."_,,,,,,,_,~,,,,.H" ,," d."."", ',"""', ""...".,._."" ,,,,,'H'
Ernie Claudio, Director
"'"'''''''''''''''''''''''''~''M'''''''
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
SEPTEMBER 18, 2008
MINUTES
The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District met in a regular session,
September 18, 2008, 2:00 P.M., District Office, 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South lake
Tahoe, California.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
President Mosbacher, Directors Rise, Claudio, Jones,
Schafer
ATTENDEES
STAFF:
Solbrig, Sharp, Sciuto, Swain, Brown, Curtis, Cocking,
M. Alsbury, C. Skelly, Frye, Bergsohn, Pettey, Ruiz,
Adams, Attorney Herrema
GUEST:
Terry Hackleman, Nexlevel
Mike Adams led the pledge to the flag. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Moved Claudio / Second Schafer / Passed Unanimouslv CONSENT CALENDAR
to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted:
a. Annual Software Support Costs for Financial/Payroll
Software and Maintenance Plus Services - Approved
payments to Sungard Public Sector Bi-Tech Software,
Inc., for: (1) Annual maintenance costs in the amount
of $19,095.62; and (2) Maintenance Plus Program
discounted consulting and development costs, in the
amount of $5,500;
b. South Upper Truckee Well No.3 Corrosion Control
Treatment - (1) Approved the Project Closeout
Agreement and Release of Claims; and (2) Authorized
staff to file a Notice of Completion with the EI Dorado
County Clerk.
-65-
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 PAGE - 2
Terry Hackelman, NexLevel, gave a PowerPoint PRESENTATION: IT STRATEGIC
presentation detailing the IT Strategic Plan planning PLAN
process, purpose, assessment results, risk, security,
and succession plan. Reliance on technology has
increased tremendously, and is very important since it
improves District operations.
ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION
Moved Schafer / Second Rise / Passed Unanimously
to approve payment in the amount of $891 ,408.16.
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Water and Wastewater Operations Committee: The
committee met September 15. Minutes of the meeting
are available upon request. Staff and committee members
toured the Diamond Valley Ranch as part of the meeting,
and they reported on same.
BOARD MEMBER STANDING
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Director Jones reported on the September 10 agency EL DORADO COUNTY WATER
board meeting, where the main topic was Fazio water. AGENCY PURVEYOR
He distributed a letter re: the county water service contract. REPRESENTATIVES REPORT
Director Claudio distributed a typed board report and BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
reportEld on California Forward. Board members indicated
the Board was not interested in taking a position on Prop. 11.
Director Schafer distributed his CASA Conference board
report, and other materials he received at the conference.
He reported on California Forward and redistricting.
Director Mosbacher reported that the recent rash of editorials
and inaccurate information published in the newspaper did
not result in a room full of spectators. She stated that it was
not a good tool to use to attract public attendance at Board
meetings.
General Manaqer: Richard Solbrig reported on two items: GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS
1) Integrated Regional Water Management Plan &
Proposition 84 - Alpine County, including its west slope,
has been included in the group that will represent the Lahontan
region. The State of California will publish the grant package
guidelines on September 21.
2) CalTrans Erosion Control Projects - CalTrans staff provided
comments and identified utility conflicts. A fair number have
been addressed, however, many still remain. They are adding
stormwater facilities and bicycle trail components in order to
deem it an air quality / transportation project. The USFS denied
the District's utility reimbursement request, and are again
-66-
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 18, 2008
PAGE-3
misinterpreting the language in the Lake Tahoe Restoration GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS
Act to justify their denial. If plans go forward, they wan the (continued)
District to pay for five miles of waterline relocations between
Trout Creek to Stateline. Their mandate was to install storm
drains, and they decided to do the rest on their own. The
City of South Lake Tahoe is contributing funding for the bike
trails, and the California Tahoe Conservancy is funding the
rest. District staff will continue to pursue this and work to
obtain reimbursement for all utility relocations.
Leqal Counsel: Brad Herrema reported the State Board STAFF REPORTS
accepted the draft recycled water policy submitted by stake-
holders. A separate policy will be negotiated for agriculture.
District Information Officer: Dennis Cocking reported the
state presented its budget, but the governor said he would
veto it.
The District's Washington D.C. representatives will be in
Tahoe in October to give a legislative wrap-up.
3:45 P.M.
(There was nothing to discuss in Closed Session.)
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED
SESSION AND RECONVENED TO
OPEN SESSION
ACTION I REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION
No reportable Board action.
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)/Conference
with legal Counsel - Existing
Litigation re: Meyers landfill Site:
United States of America vs. EI
Dorado County and City of South
lake Tahoe and Third Party
Defendants, Civil Action No.
S-01-1520 lKK GGH, U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Ca.
The Board and staff left the Boardroom at this point
and toured the final effluent pump station project, as
part of the meeting.
4:50 P.M.
TOUR OF FINAL EFFLUENT
PU MP STATION PROJECT
ADJOURNMENT
Mary lou Mosbacher, Board President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
ATTEST:
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board -67-
South Tahoe Public Utility District
~~~
. R~;
\$\~~SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
"Basic Services for a Complex World"
,.~~c~ar~ .~~"I~r~~, .~_~~~~~~ ~":n:~er
Mary Lou Mosbacher, President
""" , ' '''''''' dO<' ,""
BOARD MEMBERS
Paul Sciuto, Assistant Manager
'" 'h'_" ...", "",,,,,,.,,, ,..M,__",,,",, ,,,"",,
Dale Rise, Vice President
James R. Jones, Director Eric W. Schafer, Director Ernie Claudio, Director
"W'WM"""..,."..'M=.,. '. "" ""'''.'~''''_''^,,,'''_H.'''~'''''' ,'v,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ' '. ""'" .',," " ,',," "", "," """"'''''''''''''''",n' """=="'''..",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
OCTOBER 2, 2008
MINUTES
The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District met in a regular session,
October 2, 2008, 2:00 P.M., District Office, 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South lake Tahoe,
California.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
President Mosbacher, Directors Rise, Jones, Schafer.
Director Claudio arrived at 2: 1 0 p.m.
ATTENDEES
STAFF:
Solbrig, Sharp, Sciuto, Whalen, Hoggatt, Bergsohn,
C. Stanley, Ryan, Barnes, Brown, Rasmussen, Cocking,
Curtis, Hughes, Attorney Herrema. (Attorney Kvistad
participated in Closed Session via teleconference.)
Shelly Barnes led the pledge to the flag.
PLEDGE OF AllEGIANCE
CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA
OR CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Item b. (Final and Secondary Effluent Pump
Station) was brought forward for discussion prior to
Board action.
Moved Jones / Second Schafer / Claudio Absent /
Passed to approve the Consent Calendar as amended:
CONSENT CALENDAR
a. South Upper Truckee Well No.3 Controls Building/
Corrosion Control Treatment Facility - Authorized
an increase to Purchase Order No. P19126 to Entrix
Incorporated for added services to conduct radon
monitoring, in the amount of $12,000;
b. See Consent Items Brought Forward;
c. Forest Mountain Re-Coating - Extended contract
with Bay Area Coating Consultants for consulting
services, in the amount of $11,660, for~!otal
amount not to exceed $18,540;
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 2, 2008
PAGE-2
d. Iroquois Tank Paving - Approved Change Order
No.1 to G.B. General Engineering, in the amount
of $21,931;
e. Approved Regular Board Meeting Minutes:
September 4, 2008.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(continued)
CONSENT ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR DISCUSSION I ACTION
Julie Ryan explained that the text for each individual
Change Order item would be changed to reflect the
cost associated with the work, not the time spent.
(2: 1 0 P.M. - Director Claudio arrived at this point in
the meeting.)
Moved Jones / Second Rise / Passed Unanimouslv
to approve Change Order No.2 to Pacific Mechanical
Corporation, in the amount to $20,858.24.
FINAL AND SECONDARY
EFFLUENT PUMP STATION
(Consent Item b.)
ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION
Moved Schafer / Second Jones / Passed Unanimously
to approve payment in the amount of $2,960,819.23.
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Water and Wastewater Operations Committee: The
committee met September 29. Minutes of the meeting
are available upon request.
City of South lake Tahoe Issues Ad Hoc Committee:
Richard Solbrig inquired if the Board would rather wait
until after the City Council elections are held to schedule
a meeting. It was the consensus of the Board to move
ahead now since time is of the essence.
Director Jones reported he attended the September 23
ECC (Employee Communications Committee) meeting
and gave a Board report as part of the meeting.
Director Claudio reported the contractors working on
the Tata waterline project are a very professional group,
and are doing an excellent job.
He also reported on several of the topics discussed at the
September 29 Water and Wastewater Committee meeting,
and on his attendance at the Pacific Southwest Symposium.
Director Mosbacher reported she received a complaint
about cuts and patching in the road resulting from a District
project. It was explained that they are temporary patches
until crews complete the work in that particular7cifea.
BOARD MEMBER STANDING
COMMITTEE REPORTS
BOARD MEMBER AD HOC
COMMITTEE REPORT
BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 2, 2008 PAGE - 3
General Manager: Richard Solbrig reported on the GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS
following items: The Integrated Regional Water Manage-
ment Plan and Proposition 84 guidelines have not been
issued yet; District properties will be assessed for possible
trade with the California Tahoe Conservancy; an emer-
gency scenario response exercise will be conducted
November 6; staff is working with Heavenly and their
commitment to pay for a water rate study and build facilities
to achieve a 4,000 gpm pumping rate; the Koff salary
survey for management positions has been completed and
the results will be incorporated into the management
negotiations process; and introduced Paul Hughes,
the District's new Chief Financial Officer.
Assistant General Manaqer / Enqineer: Paul Sciuto STAFF REPORTS
reported on presentations that will be given on the
Diamond Valley Master Plan. The plan was distributed
to Board members to review prior to the October 16
Board Workshop that will be held to address comments.
Chief Financial Officer: Paul Hughes reported that the
District's portfolio does not include investments in stock,
so the market fluctuations do not impact the portfolio;
however, earnings received in investments can fluctuate.
The investments are sound and there have been no
changes in any programs. Security is the same as a
year ago.
Leqal Counsel: Brad Herrema reported on a Federal
Trade Requirement to implement an identity theft
program. Under its criteria, the District is considered
a creditor and must comply with the requirements
by November 1. The "Red Flag Rule" will be placed on
the next agenda for consideration.
District Information Officer: Dennis Cocking reported
that money contributed to ACW A for an arsenic study
may be utilized; staff is working with Barton Hospital
to try to develop a disposal site for pharmaceuticals
in order to keep them from entering the water supply;
the state's budget was signed with no borrowing from
Proposition 1 a (staff is working on legislation to
exempt the District from future threats to take property
taxes); and Washington D.C. representatives from ENS
Resources will be here on October 27.
3:25 - 3:40 P.M.
MEETING BREAK ADJOURNMENT
TO CLOSED SESSION
-71-
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 2, 2008
PAGE-4
ACTION I REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION
No reportable Board action.
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)/Conference
with legal Counsel -- Existing
Litigation re: Meyers Landfill Site:
United States of America vs. EI
Dorado County and City of South
lake Tahoe and Third Party
Defendants, Civil Action No.
S-01-1520 lKK GGH, U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Ca.
Attorney Kvistad participated in Closed Session
via teleconference.
4:10p.M.
ADJOURNMENT
Mary lou Mosbacher, Board President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
ATTEST:
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board
South Tahoe Public Utility District
-72-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Direct,ot'!i
Ernie Claudio
,Jamll$ R. JOt1e6
Mary Lou MOl.".IlChcr
DCillllRiae
~ric 0chafer
GIJ'1ual Manatjer
":IGhard H, Solbriq
1275 Meadow Creat Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0014
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Diamond Valley Ranch Temporary Containment Basin
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve proposal from selected consultant to provide
engineering services in general accordance with the District Request for Quote (RFQ)
dated September 30,2008.
DISCUSSION: District staff developed a monitoring well installation workplan to drill
and install three (3) monitoring wells in Diamond Valley, Alpine County, CA. This work
plan was submitted for regulatory review to the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board - Lahontan Region on September 29,2008. Information collected during
the monitoring well installations will describe the hydrogeologic characteristics of the
uppermost aquifer through the development of geologic logs; delineation of the depth
and thickness of water-bearing zones; and collection of groundwater level and baseline
water quality data. Upon completion, the monitoring wells will provide the data needed
to evaluate potential changes in water quality from the planned application of reclaimed
wastewater to land in Diamond Valley. The consultants scope of work shall entail
providing all required well permitting, hydrogeologic data collection, well drilling,
laboratory testing and surveyor services to complete the monitoring well installation
program as provided in the workplan.
At this time, District staff are reviewing and evaluating the submitted proposals and will
provide a recommendation for the Board to approve the consultant believed to be best
qualified to conduct the work at the October 16th Board meeting.
SCHEDULE: October 2008 - February 2009 (anticipated)
COSTS: To be provided at the October 16,2008 Board Meeting
ACCOUNT No: 1029-8836/MEIK08
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $1,107,289
ATTACHMENTS: Request for Quote- Phase 1 Irrigation Fields Monitoring Well
Installations, Diamond Valley, Alpine County, CA (09/30/2008); Summary review of the
proposals will be presented at the meeting73_
(-Jf:; tiC ri)l Mfinaqer
Rich.wd H, So/brig
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Directom
[mit Claudio
Jamc"J R. Jonefi
Mary lou MOf>l1achl'r
Dale Ri$e
Eric chafer
1275 Meadow Creet Drive · South Lake Tahoe. CA 9615(
Phone 550 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-06~
September 30,2008
Contact
Firm
Address
City, State Zip
Re: Request for Quote - Phase 1 Irrigation Fields Monitoring Well
Installations, Diamond Valley, Alpine County, CA
Dear Contact:
The South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) is seeking proposals from
qualified engineering firms to conduct a monitoring well installation program in
Diamond Valley, Alpine County, California (Section 36, T 11 N, R 19E). The
program generally involves the drilling and installation of three (3) shallow
groundwater monitoring wells; lithologic logging and soil classification; soil
sampling and laboratory determination of hydraulic properties; groundwater
sampling and laboratory analyses of selected water quality parameters; and
surveying (NAD'83, California State Plane Coordinate System, Zone 2 and
NA VD88 vertical datum). A work plan describing the monitoring well installation
program is attached. Inspection of the proposed monitoring well sites will be
available at the Diamond Valley Ranch on Tuesday, October ih at 10:00 a.m.
(rendezvous location - TBD).
The District seeks to complete the monitoring well installation program in general
accordance with the following schedule:
TASK
1. Execute District Task Order
2. Com lete AI ine Count Permit A Iications
3. Start Drilling, Soil Sampling, Monitoring Well
Installations and Develo ment
4. Complete Drilling, Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well
Installations and Develo ment
5. Conduct Groundwater Sam ling
6. SUNe New Monitorin Wells
7. Submit draft technical re ort for District review.
8. Finalize and submit technical re ort to the District.
ESTIMATED DATE
10/23/2008
11/05/2008
11/10/2008
11/21/2008
11/25/2008
11/25/2008
01/12/2009
01 /30/2009
-75-
;)iamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Phase 1 Monitoring Well Installation Program
Request for Quote
Pag'~ 2
30-Sep.08
To be considered for this project, consultants are required to submit four (4)
copies of their proposals in a sealed envelope marked "Phase 1 Monitoring Well
Installation Program" addressed to:
Ivo Bergsohn,
Hydro-Geologist,
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA
96150
Consultant ~roposals shall be received until the close of business on Tuesday,
October 141 ,2008.
Submitted proposals shall include the following elements:
1. Scope of Work
2. Project Team including all sub-contracted drilling, laboratory and surveyor
services;
3. Project Schedule; and
4. Project Budget
Selection will be based on the Consultants approach and demonstrated ability to
meet the desired schedule in an efficient and cost-effective manner. All field work
shall be conducted by or under the immediate supervision of an experienced
California Professional Geologist (P.G.). All drilling work shall be performed by a
C-57 licensed well driller. All survey services shall be completed by a
Professional Land Surveyor. All water quality analyses shall be performed by a
California Department of Health Services certified laboratory.
Please contact Ivo should you have any questions or require any additional
information regarding this request at iberqsohn@stpud.dst.ca.us or by phone at
543.6204.
Sincerely,
Ivo Bergsohn, C.HG.
Hydro-Geologist
Paul Sciuto, P.E.
Assistant General Manager
cc: H. Bird
J. Hoggatt
R. Solbrig
File
-76-
~: 1 .
General Manaec:r
Richard H, Solt;o~
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Dircctore
Ernie Claudio
Jamas R. Jane.:;
Mary Lou M05l1achcr .
Dale Ri~
Eric Schafer
1275 Meadow Cre6t Dr/ve · South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541~0614
September 29, 2008
Mr. Robert Tucker
Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board
2501 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Re: Monitoring Well Installation Workplan, Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields,
Alpine County, CA
Dear Mr. Tucker:
The South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) is submitting the following work
plan to drill and install three (3) monitoring wells in Diamond Valley, Alpine
County, California. The soil and groundwater data collected from the drilling and
installation of these monitoring wells will be used to develop geologic logs,
identify the depth and thickness of water-bearing zones and collect groundwater
level and baseline water quality data to ascertain the hydrogeological
characteristics through the uppermost aquifer within the northern portion of
Diamond Valley (Section 36, T 11 N, R 19E) [Figure 1]. This information will be
used to establish a groundwater monitoring system that can provide the data
needed to evaluate potential changes in water quality from the proposed use of
new irrigation fields designed for the application and temporary containment of
reclaimed wastewater in Diamond Valley_
'BACKGROUND
The District is designing irrigation fields that will serve a dual purpose. Their
primary use will be as an irrigation site for land application of reclaimed
wastewater. During emergencies, especially in response to a flood event, the
fields will also provide an area for emergency discharge and temporary
containment. After the emergency event is over, the contained water will be
pumped back to Harvey Place Reservoir.
The design concept for the proposed irrigation fields allows flood and sprinkler
irrigation, useable in all seasons. Initially the facility may be irrigated with
-77-
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation Workpran,
Alpine County, CA
Page 2
29-Sep-08
existing freshwater rights diverted from the West Fork of the Carson River. As
the potential need for recycled application area grows in response to potential
development of existing application areas, reclaimed wastewater may be used to
irrigate the Irrigation Fields.
The existing emergency reclaimed wastewater facility (a.k.a. "On-Farm") was
evaluated and found to be insufficient for emergency discharge needs. Sites for
new emergency facilities (the irrigation fields), have been identified in Fields 1,2,
3, 6 and part of Field 7. Based on the topography and layout of Diamond Valley
Ranch, the District has determined that Fields 6 and 7 are the most feasible
candidates for emergency discharge and temporary containment in the first
phase.
Two irrigation fields have been planned along the western perimeter of Field 6
(Figure 2). The fields are designed to follow the natural contour of the
surrounding area, sloping toward the northeast. The maximum cut of the
irrigation fields is estimated at about 9 feet. Each field will be bounded by a 6-ft
tall berm on its down-slope side. Because the berms are 6-ft tall, they are not
governed by the California Division of Safety of Dams regulations.
The area of the planned irrigation fields will be initially used for a demonstration
project to ascertain the potential effects of applying reclaimed wastewater to land
in Diamond Valley. Information gained from the demonstration project will be
incorporated into a Nutrient Management Plan for the area. To evaluate
hydrogeologic conditions near the planned irrigation fields, prior to the application
of reclaimed water, and to establish a groundwater monitoring system after the
irrigation fields are put in service, the District plans to drill and install groundwater
monitoring wells as proposed in the following workplan.
Hydrogeologic Setting
Geologic logs from District monitoring wells drilled in Diamond Valley show that
the upper portion of the subsurface is composed predominantly of poorly-graded
mixtures of medium to coarse granitic sands, gravels and boulders. Thin layers of
clayey sand and silt are rare. These sand, gravels and boulders have been
mapped as Quatemary moraine, and younger outwash and valley-fill deposits
(Armin and John, 1983). Depending on location across the valley fine silt;
tuffaceous sandstone and gravel; and volcanic lithic tuffs, welded tuffs and
andesite are encountered below the upper sand and gravel deposits at depths
varying from about 40 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) to as much as 480 ft
bgs (Figure 3 ). These underlying deposits have been mapped as Tertiary
Volcanics (Armin and John, 1983).
Available hydrogeologic data suggests that the uppermost aquifer in Diamond
Valley is encountered within the upper sand and gravel deposits. Depth to water
-78-
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation Workplan,
Alpine County. CA
Page 3
29-Sep-08
readings collected from monitoring wells completed within these deposits,
suggest that the uppermost portion of the aquifer occurs at depths ranging from 2
ft bgs to as much as 60 ft bgs. Through the area of the proposed irrigation fields
the uppermost aquifer is inferred to be situated within 40 feet of land surface.
Flow patterns across the regional groundwater system through Diamond Valley
have been inferred using the following data:
1. Water level elevations measured at District monitoring wells;
2. Water and stream bed elevations using USGS 7.5-minute topographic
survey data at: Springs; Along the West Fork of the Carson River; Along
Indian Creek; and at Mud lake; and
3. Inferred groundwater elevations at the alluvial-bedrock contacts near the
west, south and east margins of the region.
In general, groundwater flow is inferred to flow from recharge areas at higher
elevations along the basin margins toward discharge areas at lower elevations
occurring along surface water reaches along the valley floors (Figure 4).
Groundwater recharge toward Diamond Valley is inferred to be from recharge
areas located along the east slopes of the Carson Range, south and west of
Diamond Valley. From these recharge areas, groundwater flow is generally
directed to the northeast toward Diamond Valley. Through Diamond Valley, these
flow directions are believed to diverge and are generally directed to the northwest
toward the West Fork of the Carson River near the west margin of the valley and
are generally directed to the east-northeast toward Indian Creek near the east
margin of the valley. The Tertiary volcanics compromising the low-lying hills
forming the north margin of the valley are believed to form a low permeability
boundary that accentuates this divergence of regional groundwater flow through
Diamond Valley.
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS
Locations
Figure 5 shows the proposed monitoring well locations. A total of three (3)
monitoring wells are proposed for installation. Each location is situated on District
property and has been given a temporary site designation. For example, IFMW-
01 P refers to the proposed location for Irrigation Field Monitoring Well 1. New
well designation consistent with the District's Alpine County groundwater
monitoring program will be assigned for each monitoring well, following well
installations. A description of the proposed locations is summarized in Table 1.
-79-
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation Workplan,
Alpine County, CA
Page 4
29-Sep-08
TABLE 1. Proposed Phase 1 Diamond Valley Irrigation Field Monitoring
Well Locations
SITE LOCATION DESCRIPTION INFERRED ACCESS
POSITION
IFMW-01p SW 'l4, NE 'l4, Sec 36, Behind (south of) Up- Ranch
T 11 N, R19E Diamond Valley Ranch gradient House
House, next to STPUD access
weather station. drivewav.
IFMW-02p NW 'l4, NE 1;:1, Sec 36, Approximately 50' Down- Field No.
T 11 N, R19E southeast of Snowshoe gradient 6 north
Thompson Ditch NO.2 access
Diversion Box, west gate.
marQin of Field No.6
IFMW-03p NW 'l4, NE 1;:1, Sec 36, Approximately 50' east Down- Field No.
T 11 N, R19E of Snowshoe Thompson gradient 6 north
Ditch No.2, near access
northwest corner of gate from
Field NO.6 DV
Road.
Figure 4 suggests that groundwater flow directions are inferred to diverge near
the Phase 1 Irrigation Field area. The final location of IFMW-03p may be
relocated east of the west margin of the irrigation fields, should water level
readings from new monitoring wells constructed at IFMW-01 p, IFMW-02p, and
ACMW-09; show that groundwater flow directions are actually to the east, toward
Indian Creek, through this portion of Diamond Valley.
Photos showing the proposed monitoring well location sites are attached to this
workplan.
Drilling Method
Due to the prevalence of unconsolidated sand, gravel and boulder size materials
in the subsurface, all borings used for monitoring well installations will be drilled
using either of the following cased-hole air rotary drilling methods:
· Air Rotary/Casing Advance drilling system;
· Air Rotary with StrateX@ drilling system; or
· Air Rotary with Odex@drilling system.
Cased-hole air rotary drilling methods are believed to be appropriate for this
project because of; its ability to drill through unconsolidated sand and gravel
deposits; capability to collect depth discrete soil samples; capability to provide a
temporary cased borehole for well construction; and absence of a drilling fluids
requirement.
-80-
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation Workplan,
Alpine County, CA
Page 5
29-Sep-08
Well Construction
Figure 6 is a schematic showing proposed well construction. Final casing and
screen interval depths will be based on subsurface conditions encountered in the
field. Based on available data, the total depths of the proposed monitoring wells
are inferred to range from 40 ft bgs to 60 ft bgs.
In general. each monitoring well will be constructed using new 2-inch nominal
diameter Schedule 80 (Sch 80) poly vinyl chloride (PVC) well casing and well ,
screen, installed in a nominal 8-inch diameter borehole. Well screen sections will
be constructed using new 2-inch nominal diameter Sch 80 PVC slotted pipe
(0.050 slots). All casing joints shall be flush-threaded and made water-tight using
Viton O-rings on the male ends of the casing sections. Prior to connecting casing
sections, joint threads will be wrapped with f1uoropolymer tape (PTFE Thread
Seal Tape) for added security. Solvent cements will not be used in the
construction of the monitoring wells.
Each monitoring well will be similarly constructed with a flush thread PVC
threaded end plug at the bottom of the well, followed by a minimum 10-foot
section of well screen, and blank casing extending from the top of the well screen
to ground surface. A gravel envelope consisting of SRI Supreme #6 filter sand
material or equivalent will be placed from total depth to approximately two feet
above the top of the well screen section. After the filter pack envelope has been
placed, the well screen will be swabbed using a 2-inch MonoFlex surge block to
settle the filter pack material and initiate groundwater flow across the screen
interval. Additional filter pack material may be added to complete the gravel
envelope to the specified depth. A minimum 2-foot bentonite seal consisting of
31B-inch graded bentonite (Holeplug@ or equivalent) will be placed immediately
above the top of the filter pack. Following hydration of the bentonite seal, an 8
sack sand-cement grout will be used to fill the annulus and form a sanitary seal
from the top of the transitional seal to ground surface.
Each monitoring well will be completed using a locking protective steel well cover
to prevent damage to the well casing. A water-tight, tamper-proof, well plug
(Morrison 678XA Well Plug or equivalent) will be used to prevent any foreign
materials from entering the well and to prevent unauthorized entry.
At least 24 hours after installation of the sanitary seal, each monitoring well will
be developed using a 2-inch MonoFlex surge block and bailer. The surge block
will be lowered to the top of the well screen and subsequently gently lowered and
raised through the screen interval to promote groundwater flow across the screen
interval. At each interval following surging, water will be bailed to remove any
accumulated sediment in the well.
-81-
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation Workpfan,
Alpine County, CA
Page 6
29-Sep-08
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Soil Sampling
At each drilling location, soil samples will be collected for USCS soil
classification, field description and laboratory determination of particle-size
distribution, bulk density and saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ks). Soil samples
will be collected from ground surface to total boring depth at 5-foot intervals and
at major changes in lithology. All samples will be collected using a 2" aD x 18"
long California Split Barrel Sampler. Upon penetrating to the desired depth, the
bottom of the casing will be cleared of residual cuttings, the drill pipe and bit will
be removed and a lined split-barrel sampler will be lowered through the drive
casing to the bottom of the borehole. The sampler will then be driven the length
of the sampler, or to refusal, into the relatively undisturbed material in advance
(Le, below the bottom) of the drive casing. All samples will be described and
logged in the field by a California Professional Geologist or an experienced
geologist working under the supervision of a California Professional Geologist.
At selected depth intervals, below the maximum depth of excavation proposed
for the irrigation fields and within the uppermost aquifer, relatively undisturbed
samples will be collected using three 2" x 6" stainless steel soil sample liners
placed within the Split Barrel Sampler. The middle liner (B) will be used for field
description. The upper (A) and lower (C) liners will be submitted to a soils testing
laboratory to determine the following hydraulic properties:
1. Bulk density (in grams/cc);
2. Particle-size distribution; and
3. Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ks) by the Constant-Head Method.
Groundwater Sampling
Groundwater samples will be collected from each monitoring well three (3) days
following well development. A purge pump will be used to evacuate each well of
from three (3) to five (5) casing volumes or until background levels of field water
quality parameters (temperature, pH, E.C.) normalize. Water samples will then
be collected using single-sample disposable bailers.
All collected samples will be handled to avoid external contamination, directly
poured into appropriate laboratory supplied containers, labelled and stored in a
chilled cooler for delivery under District chain-of-custody to a CDPH-certified
analytical laboratory. Table 2 shows the water quality parameters selected for
analysis.
-82-
.;; .~
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Welllnstallalion Workplan,
Alpine County, CA
Page 7
29-Sep-08
TABLE 2 P
dG
d
Q rt M
P
ropose roun water ua !tv omtormg arameters
PARAMETER UNITS METHOD DETECTION
LIMIT
-
Nitrate Nitrogen mg/L as N EPA 300.0 0.01
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mg/L EPA 351.2 0.05
Total Phosphorus mg/L as P Std. Meth 4500-P-E 0.01
Chlorides mg/L EPA 300.0 0.5
Alkalinity, Total mg/L as CaC03 Std. Meth 2320 B 1
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L Std. Meth 2540 C 5
Total Coliform MPN/100 ml Std. Meth 9221 B. C 2
Fecal Coliform MPN/100 ml Std. Meth 9221 B, C. E.1 2
Electrical Conductivity IJmho/cm Std. Meth 2510 B 5
(E.C.)
pH S.U. Std. Meth 4500 - H+ B
Groundwater samples will also be analyzed for the general mineral water quality
parameters presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3 P
dG
1M'
IWt Q rt P
t
ropose enera mera a er ua l[y arame ers
PARAMETER UNITS METHOD DETECTION
LIMIT
Sodium mg/L Std. Method 31118 1
Calcium mg/L Std. Method 3111 B 1
Magnesium mg/L Std. Method 3111 B 0.5
Potassium mg/L Std. Method 3111 B 0.5
Iron mg/L Std. Method 31118 0.05
Manganese mg/L Std. Method 31118 1
Alkalinity, Carbonate mg/L as Std. Math 2320 B 1
CaC03
Alkalinity, mg/L as Std. Math 2320 B 1
Bicarbonate CaC03
Sulfate mg/l EPA 300.0 0.5
Nitrite-N mg/L as N EPA 300.0 0.01
Baseline Monitoring
Following completion of the monitoring well installations, each well will be
surveyed and referenced to a common datum; NAD'83, California State Plane
Coordinate System, Zone 2 and NA VD88 vertical datum. Depth to water readings
required to establish local ground-water flow patterns across the proposed
irrigation field area will be collected by District personnel on a monthly basis.
Water quality samples will be collected by District personnel on a quarterly basis
for the water quality parameters listed in Table 2 (see above).
-83-
..'..'!
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation Workplan,
Alpine County, CA
Page 8
29-Sep-08
Decontamination
All downhole sampling equipment will be cleaned before each use at each .
monitoring well using the following procedures:
1. Wash equipment with a non-phosphate detergent; and
2. Rinse the equipment with distilled water.
WASTE DISPOSAL
Waste from drilling operations will consist of cuttings and wastewater generated
during well development and equipment decontamination. All waste cuttings will
be thin spread on District property near each monitoring well location.
Wastewater generated during well development and equipment decontamination
will be discharged directly onto District property away from any neighbouring
freshwater irrigation ditches.
SCHEDULE
The proposed soil boring/monitoring well installations are anticipated to start on
or about November 10111, 2008. The proposed wells are anticipated to be
completed sometime before December 1st, 2008, weather permitting. A technical
report documenting the installation of the proposed monitoring wells will be
submitted to the lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB-
Lahontan) approximately six weeks following completion of initial well sampling.
Baseline monitoring of these wells is anticipated to start during the first quarter of
2009. A report summarizing the findings of the baseline monitoring will be
submitted to CRWQCB-Lahontan) by no later than February 28, 2010.
-84-
,.._,. ",,',~
Diamond Valley Irrigation Fields
Monitoring Well Installation WorkpJan,
Alpine County, CA
Page 9
29-Sep-OB
Please call me should you have any questions or require any additional
information regarding these proposed monitoring well installations. I can be
contacted at iberQsohn@stpud.dst.ca.us or by phone at 543.6204.
Sincerely,
,
cc: R. Dodds, CRWQCB-Lahontan
D. Lampson, Alpine County Environmental Health
H. Bird
P. Sciuto
File
-85-
\
,1
---:/-r--
,,// II 'eM--'i~W
I '\
:\ II
.~
--r-.-
1 ...::
, j:
I ~:,
..."".\l
; \' ~
,I
-+
5~1i. I
"
( ,
~~
'\<~~,.
/ ....~..''''
.
11---;--
"
.
.
',-'I
~ i
,
I
,~Ai:4!-~..-J.y.,
'._ ,~,t ,.
~ i'}'
,/ \,
,0~J
'&' ,,' I
~ " I
" ,
; l
1.3 ,~; ':
['\
(',)
.)~~i
i
I
I
I
\
I ,~(
: '
b0
~.,
_!>,....J
~..;>""~, ' I
" \
_, 'c"~"/ ~~;--
, i 1,
(;$~i l
30 '
/e''--arCH~-' or'
1'-1: >:p
i' "",b~
I
!
I
\
(
{\
~
~
i'
,
"'""" ",0
o
""
0' "'": il[1"r,.,
~~!
) I
,,,i"
,~tl!~~Y \.
,+rf---;~'-"~:;---
t,W' I ' ",. \' ','
i \ ?h","'"
\,:/ ,';<>" h
~;"'",l,
i ',;.~"",J
.' \
r J
,~ I
)
'lrAIi
,,,,,-
c-'~ 1
J lelt ~ ~
i \ i f
\ "~, ~t 01 I "
l I. / :' I"
I ' , I' , '
\ I
, ..,t:-:.::::,~' '
,,(
1,000
-=.-
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
reo'
FIGURE 1
. Site Area'
Diamond Vall CA
, ey,
-86-
"
./
,/-
,
""
,0~t'
~' ,/ I
...\ hI( I
, L
f ~
,
J">~ ,
~'
\
" "-,
I
I
~<~~ ~,\
~~,~ T'
I
\ 1 i
c S/IfU ~
30
b0
.io~
_. ~,,"'i
r ---- "--,
I
I
I
/
,irot.~
1-- ;;;;..g ,
,..J
I
1 )
J
I! .
i ,/
J \/
'.~ I
,--.J
/
2~j(
/
i
reel
'-I I"~
i / !I
..'
s
o 1,000 2,000 3.000 4,000 5,000
-----=_.
FIGURE 2.
Proposed Phase 1 Irrigation Fields
Diamond Valley, CA
-87-
."
.0'
C
,
ro
w
~ ~"II~~
~ ., ~; i
.j:>.
lJ1
o
,C!.
q i
....
o
o
q
.j:>.
'.J
o
IC!.
''\1
I I
I ~I\
o
m
CII
'=1 '
m
q
::::
m
II
lJ1
X
ELEVATION, Ft msl
.j:>.
1.0
o
IC!.
N
o
q
-HHI K]
:;c:
ro'g:
~2..
'" 0
a.'"
:;:n
:rn
'" 0
, :>
"'~
no
.o~
c: -
'"
:J.
'"
a.
~ :;:
~ ~
Q ~
~. Ib
:E ~
~ m
, iO
<
~ ~
OJ o'
'" :>
:>
~ ~
'" N
;:. g
~ ~
lJ1
I-'
o
o
, -
CII
~
\
''\1
\
I
\
~ooJ
/
f ~:/
o
rn ."
'=1
m
I
!
GENERALIZED HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTION
DIAMOND VALLEY, ALPINE CO., CA
(Sect.36, TllN, R19E; Sect. 31, TllN, R20E
-88-
.""
"'"
\.'\1
''\1
lJ1
W
o
o
, -
G1 CII
~s>'}>
< z
m 0
r
\
\
\
''\1/
/
/'\1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -ffi/I
z
<ii1
0;;0
h~
}>o
o:S~
mnD
Cl~
CII;::j
i;1n
@)
lJ1
lJ1
o
o
I -
....,
'"''
I
I
If+'
m
''\1
/ ''\1
I I
I
~ CII
~s>'~
mo'
r
~
''\1
lJ1
0\
o
o
, -
:..-1
i.....
~ I:E
:;:)> m
,n(/)
" -i
K]
I
I I
I
I
(/)-0
0;0
Co
-i.....
Im
~)> XlCl
,n nm
'" ~-iO
..... 2
ON
2,
rOJ
.....0
20
m -
I
K]
~ 1m
:;:l>l>
,n(/)
00 -i
_._.- .--
---- -----
-...- .....-
_ ... fW.C ...... ..-:r
//"-
" /'
L
---I
e"'- ~)(;5t
; .~~ ,
~I:
:~ ~,. ,v:~~'~J'~'-!~ I
. ~ :~i:,,:,,~~"r...,;:\(,:~/;.r:', ',::;:, ::":':' ::"::':':>
'~;1iiil~~ijlii~f)
" A;l~11~lil{1~~;~!1tj:i~1if;t~~i!'lWi;Y~~, ~,Jf;:
'J
~.~Iil
r,'"
_~'b,
1,000 2,000 3,000
4,000
5,000
..'
,
Fee'
FIGURE 4.
Inferred Regional Groundwater Flow System
(June, 2008)
Diamond Valley, CA
-89-
,----
/;:-~:
. / :.-J:
~ ",I
BM S06~
j'
i
,J
,/
'it'
L Pay~esvlUe .q;'
; ~1'-~~; --
. 'I, ./ I
1,,1' L i:
..-....,'...
'.~ "
-", "'".
'i:l'
. .::;
<C,
"';,
Private Well
STPUD Monitor Well
Monitoring Well ~ Proposed
[ j STPUD Property Boundary
~ Irrigation Field - Phase 1 (proposed)
Harvey Place Reservoir
~=--
I :\:
I'
t \:
-~.::--==-:~
\
I
'.,
t,~-
'. ~.
, ' \"
, '
" < f
t..~-~~" \,
CU..~" '>""
0.1'" 1::, ~., - :,
q__/:'Ji1r --
\\~ ,/" i ~
,~ ~\ .. J ..
i 'i \
\" 'j
t, ' \"
,
,/
--------, ,
I"~;
-..
s
1,000 2,000 3,000
4,000
5,000
Fee'
FIGURE 5.
Proposed Monitoring Well Locations
Phase 1 Irrigation Field
Diamond Valley, CA
-90-
GROUND SURFACE
I
PROTECTIVE STEEL COVER
WITH LOCKING CAP
+ 2.5 FEET
CEMENT SURFACE PAD
. <
.4 '
. ~
< .
,.... SAND-CEMENT
. ANNULAR SEAL
. LENGTH VARIES
l
.: 4."
,jj" 0" 2-INCH SCHEDULE 80 PVC
.
FLUSH THREADED BLANK
... WELL CASING
<.
LENGTH VARIES
','
, . '.
.
. '
.
"
'. ,
.
.
.
: ,~
%" BENTONITE PELLETS
MINIMUM 2-FT. SEAL
2-INCH SCHEDULE 80 PVC
FLUSH THREADED
WELL SCREEN (0.050 SLOT)
LENGTH VARIES
SRI SUPREME #6
FILTER SAND
EXTENDED 2-FEET ABOVE
TOP OF WELL SCREEN
;:\f'
::'! ..
. ~ .,. .
~:'V
:X!~
. '"".
..:.~' ..
~.::~:' ""i:;:,t:. ,,~:;:
.~,~.. ~':. ~'.....,..-: "':.'"''
2-INCH FLUSH THREADED
SCHEDULE 80 PVC
END PLUG
NOT TO SCALE
Figure 6
Proposed Monitoring
Well Construction Schelll
~
- ... ...-: ..........
- _.- .--
---- -----
-".._..."..-
c_
',-St;, <
~k't~
Phase 1 Irngalion Field J
Downgradlent Monitoring Well Site
Snowshoe Thompson No 2 Diversion Box to Right
IFMW-02p JPG '
,.~T~~~ :
:"'>~I~~>::,}";"'~ ,
-92-
:)"
,~
~:'
[t'
'/,'
}'
'5,
-93-
"
,_ ...1
Soutltt TClVlOe
I ~ J...
II
C'\
\ , c>,
,. ,r
I\r ( i'1
Ri.d'1~Vcl soLbv~g~ c;ev\'er~L M~V\.Ciger
'Pub Ltc t,{ttLtttj Dtsbict
'[Soard Mel/Uber5
E rVl-[e CL~ 1A.&i [0
J~w.e,<; R,JOVl-es
M~rij Lou Mosb~c.I1er
D~Le Ri.se
hie sel1nfer
Me ltVlO riA V\,~ UltVl
Date: October 16, 2008
To: Board of Director~ R. Solbrig
From: Ivo Bergsohn ,J. ~.
Re: Phase 1 Monitoring Well Installations, Diamond Valley, CA - Consultant
Recommendation
On September 30,2008, District staff solicited proposals from four consultants to
conduct a monitoring well installation program in Diamond Valley, Alpine County, CA.
Each of these firms has a Master Agreement for Consulting Services with the District:
. AMEC, Sparks, NV;
. Brown & Caldwell, Carson City, NV;
. Farr West Engineering, Reno, NV; and
. Stantec Consulting, Reno, NV.
Proposals responding to the District's request were received from each of the
consultants. Staff reviewed and ranked the submittals using the following criteria:
. Completeness;
. Qualifications;
· Technical Approach; and
. Efficiency.
The attached scoring summaries provide the raw and weighted reviewer scores for
each firm's submittal. Based on the results of this review, District staff recommends that
the Board select Farr West Engineering to conduct the work in general accordance with
their Proposal - Phase 1 Irrigation Fields Monitoring Well Installations, Diamond Valley,
Alpine County, CA, dated October 12, 2008 and the District's Monitoring Well
Installation Workplan dated September 29, 2008. District staff further recommends a
cost ceiling of sixty-thousand dollars ($60,000.00) for this work. The cost ceiling is the
average of the range of costs estimated to complete this work.
Ce.: p, se.[vtto
/-t, DoV\,ovnV\,
FU,e
South Tahoe Public Utility District. 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Phone 530,544.6474 · Facsimile 530.541.0614 · www.stpud.us
";, ':..11;',,;''';'
. 1',".'"
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PHASE 1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS
PROJECT CODE: 1029-8836/MEIK08
RFQ EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA
On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = weak to 10 = strong) rank the proposals using the following criteria
and enter your scores on the accompanying scoring sheet.
CRITERIA
DESCRIPTION
WEIGHTING
1
Rank the overall completeness of the submittal. Does it
include all components requested in the RFP, including
example borehole log
0.20
2
Rank the project team in terms of qualifications necessary
to complete the work, Does the project team include a: P.G.;
C~57 Well Driller; P.LS.; and Certified Lab services.
Rank the project team in terms of Firm's Approach.
0.20
3
0.35
4
From the estimated schedule and budget, rate your
confidence regarding the project teams ability to successfully
address the project needs in an efficient manner.
0.25
1.00
DVR_MW _Installations.xls
10/8/2008
~J
,~ ..: J
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PHASE 1 MONITORING WEll INSTAllATIONS
SCORING SUMMARY
FIRM
1
CRITERIA
2 3
TOTAL SCORE
RAW
4
I III I
IFarr West EnQineering I
I Reviewer 11/1 8 II 8 II 7 II 7 II 30 I
I Reviewer 211I 2 II 5 II 4 II 5 II 16 I
Reviewer 3 I II II II II 0 I
Reviewer 4 EErnrnEEI 37 I
FWE Totals I 19 23 20 21 I 83 I
onsultina I
Reviewer 1 ill 7 II 5 II 7 II 7 II 26
I Reviewer 2111 3 II 5 II 5 II 5 II 18
I Reviewer 3111 II II II II 0
I Reviewer411EErnrnrnl 32
I Stantec Totalsll 19 17 20 20 I 76
IAMEC
ReviEij!l 8 II 5 II 8 II 7 II 28
Revie I 3 II 5 II 5 II 5 II 18
I Reviewer 3111 " II II II 0
Reviewer4lBBffiEEElC]1 33
AMEC Totals 1 21 18 21 19 I 79
Brown & Caldwell
Reviewer 111I 8 II 7 II 8 II 7 II 30
Reviewer 211I 2 II 5 II 5 II 5 I 17
Reviewer 311 I 0 I
I Reviewer 411 10 8 8 6 I 32 I
I B&C Totalsll 20 20 21 18 I 79 I
DVR_MW _Installations,xls
.; ~
10/16/2008
...:-~
,,\J
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PHASE 1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS
SCORING SUMMARY
I WEIGHTlNG!II 0.20 II 0.20 II 0.35 II 0.25 II 1.00
IFarr West Engineering III
I Reviewer 111I 1.60 II 1.60 II 2.45 II 1,75 II 7040
I Reviewer 211I 0.40 II 1.00 II 1.40 II 1.25 II 4.05
I Reviewer 311I 0.00 II 0.00 II 0.00 II 0.00 II 0.00
I Reviewer 4111 1.80 II 2.00 II 3.15 II 2.25 II 9.20
I FWE Totalslll 3,80 II 4.60 II 7.00 II 5.25 II 20.65
Stan tee Consulting III
Reviewer 111I 1.40 1.00 II 2.45 II 1.75 6,60 I
Reviewer 211I 0.60 1.00 1.75 I 1.25 4.60 I
Reviewer 311I 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 I
Reviewer 4111 1.80 1.40 2.80 I 2.00 8.00 I
Stantec Totalslll 3.80 3.40 II 7.00 II 5.00 II 19.20
AMEC II
Reviewer 111 1.60 1.00 2.80 I 1.75 II 7.15 I
Reviewer 211 0.60 1.00 I 1.75 II. 1.25 /I 4.60
Reviewer 3111 0.00 I 0.00 I 0.00 II 0.00 II 0.00
Reviewer 411I 2.00 II 1.60 II 2,80 II 1.75 II 8.15
AMEC Totalslll 4.20 II 3.60 II 7.35 II 4.75 II 19,90
IBrown & Caldwell III
Reviewer 1 I 1.60 II 1.40 II 2.80 I 1.75 II 7.55
Reviewer 2 0040 I 1.00 II 1,75 1.25 II 4040
Reviewer 3 0.00 0.00 II 0.00 0.00 II 0.00
Reviewer 1.60 II 2.80 1.50 II 7.90
I B&C Totalslll 4.00 II 4.00 II 7.35 II 4.50 II 19.85
1
CRITERIA
2 3
TOTAL SCORE
WEIGHTED
FIRM
4
DVR_MW _Installations.xls
2
10/16/2008
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PHASE 1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS
COST SUMMARY
FIRM CONSULTANT DRILLING GEOTECH LAB SURVEYOR TOTAL
Brown & Caldwell $ 21,320.00 $ 36,645.00 $ - $ 5,421.00 $ 3,045.00 $ 66,431.00
Farr West Engineering (Low) $ 15,550.00 $ 16,560.00 $ 2,880.00 $ 2,532.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 40,422.00
Farr West Engineering (High) $ 17,105.00 $ 49,270.00 $ 7,440.00 $ 3,376.00 $ 3,190.00 $ 80,381.00
Stantec Consulting $ 15,513.00 $ 39,122.60 $ 3,313.20 $1,474.00 $ 3,190.00 $ 62,612.80
AMEC $ 21,330.75 $ 18,169.25 $ $ 9,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 51,000.00
AVERAGE $ 60,169.36
(;Jf:n~ral M.flr1ilqer
-:id':Jr'{;j H 50ibriq
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
;),mctor!,
Ernie Claudio
.Jamell R, JOrlet'f
MElry Lou MOlOl1acher
Dale Ri~
1275 Meadow Creat Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 . Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7b
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ross Johnson, Manager of Plant Operations
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Operations Department Hire
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve hiring an Operator 1/111 six months in advance of an
anticipated opening.
DISCUSSION: One of the fifteen Operators has firm plans to retire in May of 2009. The
operations department staffs the treatment plant 24/7/365. It takes six months to a year to
develop the proficiency necessary to independently handle routine operations. A shift of two to
four operators is solely responsible for the immediate oversight of all District facilities more
than 75% of the time (nights, weekends, and holidays). The District is required by state law to
have a Grade III or higher operator on duty at all times. It takes four years for a high school
graduate to obtain a Grade III certification.
In order to assure appropriate staffing to protect the public and the operators, hiring in
anticipation of a vacant position is desirable. This request would allow hiring one additional
operator approximately 6 months in advance of an anticipated vacancy.
SCHEDULE: Recruitment process to begin as soon as possible.
COSTS: Estimated $36,000. (Six month or less overlap in salaries partially offset by reduced
overtime. )
ACCOUNT NO: 1006-4101 plus benefits
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $O-contingency transfer requested
ATTACHMENTS: None
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-95-
CATEGORY: Sewer
cJencral Manaqcr
Vichard H Soibrig
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
DiwctG'n,
Ernie Ciaudio
,)amce> R. Jones
Mary Lou Mo!>vacher
Dale Ri~e
Eric Schafer
1215 Meadow Creet Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7c
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ross Johnson, Manager of Plant Operations
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: ElectricallnstrumentationlTechnician 1/11
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize hiring a full time permanent, Electrician 1/11
with the Electrical Department to return to four person staff through attrition.
DISCUSSION: The four person electrical department has been running without one
Electrician II for six months due to a medical leave of absence. It is unknown when the
absent employee will be able to return to work. Attempts to hire a limited term
Electrician have failed and will no longer be pursued. Preventative maintenance projects
have slipped and what could have been in-house improvements have had to be
outsourced. The authorization of an Electrician 1/11 position will allow the department to
keep up with the current workload. Should the employee on medical leave of absence
return to work, the department would have an opportunity to catch up on deferred
projects. The Electrical Department would return to normal four person staff through
attrition.
SCHEDULE: Recruitment process to start as soon as possible
COSTS: Estimated, $99,806
ACCOUNT NO: 1003/2003-4101 plus benefits
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $0 Contingency transfer requested
ATTACHMENTS: None
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-97-
CATEGORY: Sewer
GtJl1eral Mi~nal!er
Richard H 50lbriq
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Drrectcm"
Emle Claudio
Jamc$ R, JOM$
Mary Lou M06vachecr
Dale Ritie
Eric Schafer
1275 Meadow Creat Drive. South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 550 541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7d
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
John Thiel, Principal Engineer
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2008
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Twin Peaks Booster Station and Waterline Replacement
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve the initial study and the determination of
no significant effect on the environment; (2) Authorize the preparation of a Notice of
Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration with submittal to the State Clearinghouse; and
(3) Publish a notice in the Tahoe Tribune with provisions for a public hearing.
DISCUSSION: In compliance with CEQA, District staff and our consultant, Auerbach
Engineering, have completed an environmental review of the proposed project and
made a determination that the project could not have a significant effect on the
environment. This initial study (CEQA Appendix G) is included here as an attachment.
With Board approval, staff will file a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration
with the State Clearinghouse, publish such notice in the Tahoe Tribune, provide for a
30-day review period, and hold a public hearing at a future Board meeting (most likely
on December 4,2008).
SCHEDULE: Immediately following Board approval.
COSTS: Less than $1,000 for newspaper advertisement.
ACCOUNT NO: 2029-7070/TPBSTR
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $86,818
ATTACHMENTS: Determination of Negative Declaration, Environmental Checklist
Form, CEQA Appendix G.
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
CATEGORY: Water
-99-
Appendix G
Environmental Checklist Form
1. Project title:
Twin Peaks Booster Station and Waterline Replacement Project
2. Lead agency name and address:
South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD)
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
3. Contact person and phone number:
Jimmie Hoggatt, 530.543.6206
4. Project location:
1012 Industrial Ave., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96140 APN #032-314-13
5. Project sponsor's name and address:
STPUD
Same as above
6.
General plan designation: Industrial
7. Zoning: Commercial-Public Service
8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
See attached Project Description.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
See attached Project Description.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
-101-
participation agreement.)
See attached Project Description,
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
D Aesthetics D Agriculture Resources D Air Quality
D Biological Resources D Cultural Resources D Geology/Soils
D Hazards & 0 Hydrology/Water 0 Land Use/Planning
Hazardous Materials Quality
D Mineral Resources 0 Noise 0 Population/Housing
D Public Services 0 Recreation 0 T ransportation/T raffic
0 Utilities/Service 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Systems
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
1XJ
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a Significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions
in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
D
D
o
-102-
o
I find that although the propos~'!d project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to
applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is
required.
~~
Signature
,0 Po( fit<
D te
Bree Allen
Printed Name
STPUD
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that
are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the
parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately
supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does
not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on
project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not
expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening
analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as
well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and
construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may
occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially
significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that
an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant
Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated"
applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect
from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The
lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they
reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from
"Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or
other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR
-103-
or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion
should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for
review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above
checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with
Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures
which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to
information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning
ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement
is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other
sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different
formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this
checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format
is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each
question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than
significance
-104-
SAMPLE QUESTION
Issues:
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a 0 0 0 1m
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, 0 0 1m 0
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual 0 0 [I 0
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or 0 0 0 1m
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In
determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by
the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique 0 0 0 ([I
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural 0 0 0 1m
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing 0 0 0 1m
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
-105-
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
III. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to
make the following determinations. Would
the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of 0 0 0 ([J
the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or 0 0 [J 0
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net 0 0 0 ([J
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial 0 D 0 [J
pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a 0 D 0 [J
substantial number of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either 0 D 0 /Xl
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any 0 D 0 [J
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on 0 0 0 [J
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
-106-
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement 0 0 0 III
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or 0 0 0 III
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted 0 0 0 III
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
V. CUL TURAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 [J 0
significance of a historical resource as
defined in ~ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 [J 0
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to ~ 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique 0 0 [J 0
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including 0 0 [J 0
those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the
project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential 0 0 ITI D
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as 0 0 0 m
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
-107-
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? D D D [J
iij) Seismic-related ground failure, including D D D [J
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? D D D [J
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the D D D rEI
loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is D D D rEI
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in D D D [J
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately D D D [J
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS -- Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or D D [J D
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or D D rEI D
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle D D [I D
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
-108-
Less Than
Potentially Sign ificant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated impact Impact
d) Be located on a site which is included on a D D CJ ~
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land D D CJ ~
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private D D CJ ~
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically D D CJ [J
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a D D CJ [J
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALlTY-
- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or D D 1m D
waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater D D l[J D
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level
(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage D D 1m D
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
-109-
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage 0 0 [J 0
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which 0 0 [J 0
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water 0 D [J 0
quality?
g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood 0 0 D [J
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 1 aD-year flood hazard area 0 0 0 [J
structures which would impede or redirect
flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant 0 D D [J
risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of
a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 D [J
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the
project:
a) Physically divide an established 0 D D [J
community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, 0 0 [J 0
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat 0 0 [] 0
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
-110-
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X, MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 [I
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- 0 0 0 [J
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
XI. NOISE -- Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of 0 0 0 [J
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of 0 0 0 [J
excessive groundborne vibration or
ground borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in 0 0 0 [J
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic 0 0 [I 0
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without
the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 [J
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 0 0 [J
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
-111-
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would
the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an 0 0 0 [I
area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing 0 0 0 [J
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, 0 0 0 [I
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection? 0 0 0 [J
Police protection? 0 0 0 [J
Schools? 0 0 0 [I
Parks? 0 0 0 [I
Other public facilities? 0 0 0 [I
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of 0 0 0 [J
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
-112-
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Does the project include recreational 0 0 0 [J
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATIONrrRAFFIC -- Would
the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is 0 0 I'EJ 0
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections )?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, 0 0 0 rEJ
a level of service standard established by the
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, 0 0 0 [J
including either an increase in traffic levels or
a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a 0 0 r8l 0
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 [J
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 [J
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or 0 D 0 [J
programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS--
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment 0 D 0 [J
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
-113-
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
with
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Require or result in the construction of D 0 [J 0
new water or wastewater treatment facilities
or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new D 0 [J D
storm water drainage facilities or expansion
of existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to D 0 D !XI
serve the project from existing entitlements
and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the D 0 D !XI
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient D 0 D [J
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local D 0 D rEI
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to D 0 !XI D
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are D 0 [J D
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
-114-
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
o
o
[J
o
Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21087, Public Resources Code. Reference:
Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151, Public
Resources Code; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal.App.3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v.
Monterey Board of Supervisors, 222 Cal.App.3d 1337 (1990).
-115-
Twin Peaks Pump Station and Waterline
PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT
INTRODUCTION
The South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) is located in California on the south shore of
Lake Tahoe, delivering domestic water supply for an estimated 14,000 residential and
600 commercial customers. STPUD also provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal
for an estimated 17,000 connections. Since the Angora Fire in the summer of 2007, the District
has been concerned about providing reliability and redundancy for all transmission and
distribution infrastructure systems, to maintain fire fighting capabilities in the event that one or
more facilities becomes disabled during a fire event.
One area where the current infrastructure has been identified with limitations is the South
Tahoe High School. Therefore, the District has proposed the construction of the Twin Peaks
Booster Station and Waterline Project (Project). The Project includes the construction of a
booster station building housing pumps and related equipment and related 12-inch diameter
water mains in Lake Tahoe Blvd. Figure 1 depicts the concept plan.
Project Location
The booster station will be located approximately 2,080 feet south of the intersection of
Industrial Ave. and Lake Tahoe Blvd. on a proposed 60-foot x 80-foot parcel, easterly and
adjacent to Lake Tahoe Blvd. The site for the proposed booster station includes an existing
STPUD-owned parcel (APN 032-314-13), and a portion of the adjoining parcel (APN 032-314-
14) currently under separate ownership. The parcels are located within the City of South Lake
Tahoe, and are bordered to the west and south by the unincorporated area of EI Dorado
County.
Existing Conditions
The existing STPUD parcel is small (25' x 50'), and includes an abandoned water well and
associated pump building. The parcel and well facilities were purchased by STPUD from the
Angora Water Company in the 1970's, but no longer serves any function as part of the STPUD
water infrastructure. The adjoining parcel to the north and east is owned by Delta Tahoe, Inc., is
approximately 1.89 acres in size, and is occupied by automobile repair facilities and outdoor
paved parking areas. The proposed project will require the acquisition of land from Delta
Tahoe Inc., through a Minor Boundary Line Adjustment (MBLA).
The remaining portions of the project are located within the right-of-way of Lake Tahoe Blvd.,
between the booster station site and Viking Road approximately 3,510 lineal feet to the north.
Lake Tahoe Blvd. is currently a 4-lane paved road. There is an existing 12-inch water main
running parallel to Lake Tahoe Blvd. on the west side of the roadway. Other underground
utilities exist within the roadway as well. This portion of the project area is within the
unincorporated area of EI Dorado County.
FINAL -- OCTOBER 7, 2008
J:\0071 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71 ,05 _Project Description,doc
-116-
-117-
I-
o
w
.., z
~ 0
~ to-
W <(
Z ~
~ 0
0:: co a.
w 0 ~
~ ~o 0
~ g~ u
QZ Cia I!I
z:3T" ~~ Z
c{Cl.o!:3 tt
OZt-z 1l.Q ...
_Cl.GlW:E ...
I-w'" ::J Z
c{0 ::lIOn.
I-Z~ 8 i!i
enOu.;:::.c Z
0::0 o~ ...
W Z.c
I- _-:r
en ~B u
o -OW <(
o 0:. m
ID ~
en ...
~ ::J
~ <(
~
Z
~
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project consists of the construction of a new booster station adjacent to Lake Tahoe Blvd.,
and associated underground pipelines and utilities located in Lake Tahoe Blvd. The project is
proposed to be constructed during the 2009 construction season, between the months of May
and October.
Booster Station
The proposed booster station building is a masonry block structure with slab floor and wood
framed roof structure. The building is approximately 38 feet in length, 27 feet in width and 27
feet tall. The building will house three vertical turbine pumps, backup power generator, motor
controls and related equipment. Site work associated with the building includes approximately
2,700 SF of asphalt paving for access by maintenance vehicles. This includes a 20-foot wide
driveway connection to Lake Tahoe Blvd., with tapers designed to the requirements of EI
Dorado County Dept. of Transportation (DOT). The site will be fenced for security purposes.
The South Y Industrial Tract Community Plan (Plan) includes the area about one-mile
southwest of the South Tahoe "Y", east of Lake Tahoe Blvd. and generally includes all
properties south of D St., between Industrial Ave. and Lake Tahoe Blvd. The plan states that all
parcels along Lake Tahoe Blvd. shall be required to screen all development. The screening
proposed by the District solid wood fence along Lake Tahoe Blvd. with a wrought iron or chain
link fence, six feet high along the north, east and west property lines. The access gate will be
operated manually and will a swing type gate.
Site work will include installation of drainage improvements designed to collect, treat and
dispose of runoff associated with a 100-year storm from all impervious surfaces on the site.
Storm water treatment and snow storage will be located on the east side of the site. Drainage
from the northerly building roof line would be collected in a drip line infiltration trench along the
north property line. The pavement would be graded to slope to the east and to facilitate
drainage collection and treatment.
Materials and equipment for construction of the project would be staged immediately to the
north of the booster station site, on existing paved areas.
Water Mains
The booster station will lift water from the pressure zone around the Industrial Blvd. area to the
high school. A 12-inch diameter water line will be constructed in Lake Tahoe Blvd. from the
intersection of Industrial Blvd. to the booster station (approximately 415 feet), to provide the
water supply (suction line) to the pump. This portion of the water line will be located in the
westerly edge of the southbound lane of Lake Tahoe Blvd. A 12-inch diameter pump discharge
FINAl-- OCTOBER 7,2006
J:\0071 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71 ,OS_Project Description.doc
2
-118-
line will be placed from the booster station to D Street (approximately 2,150 feet) where it will
connect to the existing South Tahoe High School (STHS) 8-inch water main at the northwest
corner of D Street and Lake Tahoe Blvd. and will tie into an existing 12-inch waterline that will
convey flows up Lake Tahoe Blvd. to two water tanks that would support fire flow. The suction
line and the discharge line will occupy the same trench to the intersection of Industrial Ave.
From Industrial Ave. to D Street, the discharge line will be placed in the center of the easterly
southbound lane of Lake Tahoe Blvd.
All trench construction within Lake Tahoe Blvd. will occupy only one lane of traffic in any
direction, such that three lanes will be available for traffic during construction. Materials for the
proposed water lines will be polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC) or ductile iron. Open cut trenching
methods will be used to allow for continues service of the existing water mains. Standard
trench depth under the paved surface will be 5-1/2 feet, allowing for 48-inches of pipe cover.
The pipelines will be deeper in the vicinity of Industrial Ave. to provide clearance to existing
water lines in that area. Trench surface restoration will consist of a 2-inch grind over the entire
lane width by the pipeline length within the roadway, and an asphalt overlay to match existing
grades.
Other Utilities
Primary power will be provided to the site through installation of underground conduits from a
pole located approximately 200-feet to the south of the site. The conduits will be placed east of
the roadway shoulder, at the bottom of the roadway fill slope and clear of the pavement.
Boundary Line Adjustment
Parcel boundaries will be adjusted to accommodate the booster station building and site work.
The existing parcel has 25-feet of frontage along Lake Tahoe Blvd., and a depth of 50-feet.
STPUD will acquire additional land to the north and east from Delta Tahoe, Inc. The adjusted
parcel will have 50-feet of frontage, with a depth of aO-feet. The property to be acquired by the
STPUD to complete the project is currently entirely paved.
Other Agency Approvals Required
EI Dorado County (County)
A roadway encroachment permit will be will be required for the driveway access to the
booster pump station from Lake Tahoe Blvd. and for the pipeline proposed within the
County road right-of-way.
City of South Lake Tahoe (City)
A roadway encroachment permit will be will be required for that portion of the pipeline
FINAL - OCTOBER 7, 2008
J:\0071 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71 ,05 _Project Description.doc
3
-119-
within the City road right-of-way. In addition, an application for Minor Boundary Line
Adjustment will be submitted for the modifications for the boundaries of the existing
District and Delta Tahoe Inc. properties. The booster station building may be subject to
Minor Design Review through the City Community Development Dept. - Planning
Division.
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA)
The TRPA will require Project Review for the booster station, pipelines and Minor
Boundary Adjustment. This will be done through submittal of a Public Service Application
to TRPA.
EXPANDED RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. Aesthetics
The site is currently developed with a structure, fencing and paving. Land uses to
the north and east are industrial. Existing views from the roadway will change as a
result of the project, but will not be out of character with the existing developed
conditions. No exterior lighting or reflective surfaces are proposed.
II. Agricultural Resources
No agricultural lands are affected.
III. Air Quality
Normal operation of the facility will not result in impacts to air quality. Air quality
impacts due to emissions during construction of the project will be mitigated
through implementation of standard conditions of approval in accordance with
Chapter 91 of the TRPA Code.
IV. Biological Resources
The project is proposed within an urbanized, previously developed area, and within
the paved roadway of Lake Tahoe Blvd. No biological resources of significance have
been inventoried in this area.
V. Cultural Resources
No known cultural resources exist in the project area. Previously undiscovered
cultural resources may be impacted during construction. This potential impact will
be mitigated through identification and protection of previously undiscovered
cultural resources in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 29 of the TRPA
Code.
VI. Geology and Soils
FINAL -, OCTOBER 7, 2008
J:\OO71 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71.05 _Project Description,doc
4
-120-
The project geotechnical report prepared by Stantech (June 2008) identified no
unstable soils or potential for liquefaction. The closest fault lies % mile to the south
of the booster station, but its existence was deemed uncertain.
Earthwork and ground disturbance required for construction of the project is
summarized in Table 1, below:
Table 1 Earthwork/Ground Disturbance
Twin Peaks Booster Station and Waterline Project
STPUD
Total Area of Total Export Total Import Total Import
Disturbance (sf) 1 (cy)2 Structural/Bedding (cy) Native (cy)
Booster Station 4,800 304 154 150
Water Mains
Single Trench 3 5,205 1,060 482 578
Double Trench 4 1,656 337 153 184
Total 11,661 1,701 789 912
Notes:
1. sf = square footage
2. cy = cubic yardage
3. The single trench contains one 12-inch water main and is 3-feet wide,
4. The double trench contains two 12-inch water mains and is 4-feet wide.
The geotechnical report prepared by Stantec Consulting dated June 2008
recommends that the entire booster station building footprint area be over-
excavated to approximately four feet below the existing surface. That material is to
be replaced with structural fill to the proposed pad grade. The report also
recommends that bedding material be placed in the bottom of pipeline excavations
from the bottom of the trench to 12-inches above the top of pipe, with the remainder
of the trench filled with native backfill.
VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
No hazardous materials will be routinely transported or stored during operation of
the project. Construction of the project will involve the transport and storage of fuels,
paints and other flammable and/or toxic materials, and construction of the project
could expose workers to hazards due to. This potential impact will be mitigated
through preparation and implementation of a Health and Safety Plan by the project
contractor.
FINAL - OCTOBER 7, 2008
J :\0071 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71 ,OS_Project Description,doc
5
-121-
VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality
The project will involve excavation and disturbance of soils, and as such there is a
potential for impacts to surface and ground water quality. These impacts will be
mitigated through implementation of Best Management Practices (BMP's). Project
BMP's shall include installation and monitoring of temporary erosion protection and
water quality treatment systems, permanent water quality treatment systems, and
erosion controls and revegetation all in accordance with TRPA requirements.
Permanent water quality treatment systems shall be designed to treat and retain the
runoff associated with a 20-year, 1-hour storm from all proposed impervious
surfaces. The project includes a storm water detention facility sized to
accommodate a higher quantity of runoff, to reduce the likelihood of offsite
discharge to downstream properties.
According to the geotechnical report, groundwater was located at 21-feet below the
booster station site and between 2 and 8-feet throughout the pipeline alignment.
Groundwater levels can fluctuate significantly during different times of the year with
typically higher groundwater levels encountered during spring runoff. The field
exploration done for the geotechnical report was completed in May when
groundwater levels were likely higher than most times of the year. Due to the
anticipated depth of the water mains, dewatering can be achieved by pumping
directly from the bottom of the excavation. The contractor will be required to submit
a dewatering plan for District and TRPA approval prior to beginning construction,
demonstrating how dewatering will be conducted to prevent impacts to water
resources.
IX. Land Use and Planning
The proposed land use associated with the booster station is consistent with the
South Wye Industrial Tract Community Plan (CP), which classifies the land use as
Commercial-Public Service.
The project as proposed includes the construction of a paved driveway from Lake
Tahoe Boulevard into the booster station site. The CP, adopted in March 2003,
includes Policy F, which implements Objective 2 of the Transportation Goal 1. Policy
F provides that "No new ingress/egress points shall be access to Lake Tahoe
Boulevard." The parcel upon which the Twin Peaks Booster Station will be located
was created in 1965 through transfers from Inter-County Title to Delta Terminals, Inc.
and Angora Water Company. When the parcel was created, there were no access
rights or easements reserved or created, as the parcel abuts Lake Tahoe Boulevard.
While since that time the STPUD may have has permissive access to the parcel from
neighboring landowners, the parcel's rights as to ingress and egress were and have
FINAl- OCTOBER 7, 2008
J:\0071 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71.05_Projecl Description,doc
6
-122-
been from Lake Tahoe Boulevard since the parcel's creation. For that reason, the
District's access (ingress/egress) of the parcel from Lake Tahoe Boulevard is not
"new" ingress and egress, as prohibited by the CP, as it has existed for over 40
years. Accordingly, STPUD's "project" - the placement of a booster station on the
former well site and the access of the station by District staff - includes nothing
inconsistent with the CP.
X. Mineral Resources
There are no mineral resources identified on the site.
XI. Noise
The booster station will not generate noise during normal operation. Construction of
the project will subject adjoining properties to short-term noise impacts as a result of
the running of heavy equipment and tools. As the project is being conducted within
an industrial neighborhood, there are no sensitive receptors to temporary noise
during construction, and this impact will be less than significant.
XII. Population and Housing
The infrastructure proposed by this project will provide for enhanced fire
suppression for existing developed areas, and is not planned to provide
supplemental water supply for domestic use purpose. The project therefore is not
growth inducing.
XIII. Public Services
The project proposes to enhance public services (fire suppression).
XIV. Recreation
The project proposes no new recreational facilities, and does not impact any
recreational opportunities.
XV. Transportation/Traffic
No long term impacts to traffic or transportation are expected as a result of the
project. Access to the site from lake Tahoe Boulevard will be necessary for
maintenance and monitoring purposes, but this would be very infrequent (once per
week). The project will result in short term impacts to traffic in the vicinity of the
project during construction, as a result of the single lane closures and excavating
equipment operating in the roadway and intersection. These short term impacts will
be mitigated through preparation and approval of a traffic control plan, which must
be approved by EI Dorado County DOT prior to construction.
FINAL - OCTOBER 7. 2008
J:\0071 ,05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71 ,OS_Project Description,doc
7
-123-
XVI. Utilities and Service Systems
The Project will not generate wastewater during normal operation. During
maintenance to the pump station building, the inside of the building may require
occasional washing. A drain has been installed inside the building to collect any
wastewater and connects to a sump outside the building in the driveway. A vactor
truck will collect the wastewater generated from the washing of the building and
dispose of it appropriately. This impact will be less than significant.
The Project will result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities. The
storm water treatment includes the following:
· Trench Drain
. Catch Basin
. Storm Drain Piping
. Underground Infiltration System.
This impact will be less than significant.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
As required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board- Lahontan Region (Lahontan) and
TRPA appropriate project Best Management Practices (BMPs) both temporary and permanent
will be installed. The following are descriptions of both the permanent and temporary BMPs.
TEMPORARY BMPs
Temporary erosion control will be provided during the construction of the Project. All BMP's will
be monitored on a daily basis and any problems will be immediately rectified and include the
following:
1. Soil Protection Measures
2. Erosion Control Fencing
3. Tree Protection Fencing
4. Gravel Bag Check Dam
5. Dust Control
PERMANENT BMPs
Permanent BMP's will be implemented for long-term erosion control. All permanent BMP's will
be in-place at the conclusion of the construction of the Project.
1. Stormwater Treatment
a. Trench Drain
b. Catch Basin
c. Storm Drain Piping
d. Underground Infiltration System.
FINAL - OCTOBER 7, 2008
J:\OO71.05\Docs\Planning\CEQA\71 ,OS_Project Descriplion,doc
8
-124-
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
FOR APPROVAL
October 16, 2008
Payroll 10/8/08
Total Payroll
BNY Western Trust Company
CDS-health care payments
Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck legal services
LaSalle Bank
Union Bank
Total Vendor EFT
Accounts Payable Checks-Sewer Fund
Accounts Payable Checks-Water Fund
Accounts Payable Checks-Self-funded Insurance
Accounts Payable Checks-Grants Fund
Total Accounts Payable
Grand Total
Pavroll EFTs & Checks
EFT
EFT
EFT
CHK
EFT
CHK
EFT
CHK
EFT
CHK
AFLAC Medical & Dependent Care
CA Employment Taxes & W/H
Federal Employment Taxes & W/H
CalPERS Contributions
Great West Deferred Comp
Stationary Engineers Union Dues
United Way Contributions
CA State Disbursement Unit
Employee Direct Deposits
Employee Paychecks
T alaI
-125-
10/8/08
384.62
15,431.09
91,569.28
27,311.56
17,858.96
2,317.02
87.00
460.15
200,035.91
17,547.96
373,003.55
373,003.55
373,003.55
0.00
17,888.01
49,871.83
0.00
0.00
67,759.84
390,365.77
114,587.94
577.00
32,300.00
537,830.71
978,594.10
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
3T EQUIPMENT CO UNDERGROUND REP PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 2001 - 6052 1,673.70
Check Total: _ - 1,673.70 AP- 00070911 MW
A -1 CHEMICAL INC GEN & ADMIN JANIT /SUPPLY INV 1000 - 0422 1,456.96
Check Total: 1,456.96 AP 00070912 MW
ACCOUNTEMPS FINANCE CONTRACT SERVICE 1039 - 4405 994.84
ACCOUNTEMPS FINANCE CONTRACT SERVICE 2039 - 4405 994.84
Check Total: 1 989.68 AP 00070913 MW
ACCURATE AUDIO & VIDEO DIO AUDIO /VISUAL 1027 - 4940 346.84
ACCURATE AUDIO & VIDEO DIO AUDIO /VISUAL 2027 - 4940 346.83
Check Total: 693.67 AP 00070914 MW
ACWA HEALTH BENEFITS AUTHORITY GEN & ADMIN VISION INS 1000 - 2530 2,608.80
Check Total: 2,608.80 AP 00070915 MW
AIR PERFECTION HEAVY MAINT EXPORT /FRCE MAIN 1004 - 6047 428.12
Check Total: 428.12 AP 00070916 MW
ALPEN SIERRA COFFEE FINANCE OFC SUPPLY ISSUE 1039 - 6081 240.00
r
rn Check Total: 240.00 AP 00070917 MW
ALPINIE COUNTY CHAMBER DIAMOND VLY RNCH DUES /MEMB /CERT 1028 - 6250 235.00
Check Total: 235.00 AP 00070918 MW
ALPINE, COUNTY OF DIAMOND VLY RNCH OPERATING PERMIT 1028 - 6650 115,700.00
Check Total: 115,700.00 AP 00070919 MW
ALSBURY, JAY INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1037 - 6200 122.78
ALSBURY, JAY INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2037 - 6200 122.77
Check Total: 245.55 AP 00070920 MW
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERVICES GEN & ADMIN UNIFORM PAYABLE 1000 - 2518 772.42
Check Total: 772.42 AP 00070921 MW
AT &T GEN & ADMIN TELEPHONE 1000 - 6310 294.50
AT &T GEN & ADMIN TELEPHONE 2000 - 6310 294.50
Check Total: 589.00 AP 000 MW
AT &T MOBILITY UNDERGROUND REP TELEPHONE 1001 - 6310 8.33
AT &T MOBILITY ELECTRICAL SHOP TELEPHONE 1003 - 6310 9.67
AT &T MOBILITY LABORATORY TELEPHONE 1007 - 6310 8.66
User: MICHAEL Page: 1 Current Date: 10;08'2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
AT &T MOBILITY ENGINEERING TELEPHONE 1029 - 6310 -11.98
AT &T MOBILITY UNDERGROUND REP TELEPHONE 2001 - 6310 8.33
AT &T MOBILITY ELECTRICAL SHOP TELEPHONE 2003 - 6310 9
AT &T MOBILITY LABORATORY TELEPHONE 2007 - 6310 8.66
AT &T MOBILITY ENGINEERING TELEPHONE 2029 - 6310 -11.99
Check Total: 29.35 AP 00070922 MW
AT &T /CALNET 2 GEN & ADMIN TELEPHONE 1000 - 6310 474.87
AT &T /CALNET 2 GEN & ADMIN SIGNAL CHARGES 1000 - 6320 32.13
AT &T /CALNET 2 PUMPS TELEPHONE 1002 - 6310 172.78
AT &T /CALNET 2 GEN & ADMIN TELEPHONE 2000 - 6310 474.87
AT &T /CALNET 2 PUMPS TELEPHONE 2002 - 6310 118.82
Check Total: 1 273.47 AP 00070923 MW
BACHELDER, JON C PUMPS UPGR FLL ES6,7 &9 1002 - 8712 21.49
Check Total: 21.49 AP 00070925 MW
BARNES, SHELLY CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 153.28
N Check Total: 153.28 AP 00070926 MW
BENTLY AGROWDYNAMICS OPERATIONS SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1006 - 6652 1,843.22
Check Total: 1.843.22 AP MW
BING MATERIALS ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL O2SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 476.50
BING MATERIALS UNDERGROUND REP PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 2001 - 6052 1,725.30
Check Total: 2 201.80 AP 00070928 MW
BORGES & MAHONEY INC PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 340.12
Check Total: 340.12 AP 00070929 MW
BUTZ, GARTH UNDERGROUND REP TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2001 - 6200 116.41
Check Total: 116.41 AP 00070930 MW
CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FINANCE SUPPLIES 1039 - 6520 17.50
CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FINANCE SUPPLIES 2039 - 6520 17.50
Check Total: 35.00 AP 00070931 MW
CALIF DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIAMOND VLY RNCH DUES /MEMB /CERT 1028 - 6250 70.00
CALIF DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES UNDERGROUND REP DUES /MEMB /CERT 2001 - 6250 60.00
CALIF DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES CUSTOMER SERVICE DUES /MEMB /CERT 2038 - 6250 120.00
User: MICHAEL
Page: 2 Current Date: 10;082008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
Vendor Name
CALIF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
CALIF TREASURER'S OFFICE
CALIF TREASURER'S OFFICE
CALIFORNIA STEAM INC
CAPITAL RUBBER CO LTD
CDW - G CORP
CDW - G CORP
CDW - G CORP
CDW - G CORP
r
CEN TR FOR HEARING HEALTH INC
CENTER FOR HEARING HEALTH INC
Department / Proi Name
ENGINEERING
FINANCE
FINANCE
HEAVY MAINT
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
INFORMATION SYS
INFORMATION SYS
INFORMATION SYS
INFORMATION SYS
HUMAN RESOURCES
HUMAN RESOURCES
CENTERPOINT CONCRETE PUMPING ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL
CHARTER ADVERTISING /DESIGN INC DIO
CHARTER ADVERTISING /DESIGN INC DIO
CHARTER MEDIA - RENO
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
UNDERGROUND REP
GEN & ADMIN - T &M CASH BRD
ADMINISTRATION
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER INFORMATION SYS
CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE
User: MICHAEL Page:
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Description Acct# / Proi Code
OPERATING PERMIT 2029 - 6650
TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1039 - 6200
TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2039 - 6200
BIOSOL EQUP /BLDG 1004 - 6653
AUTOMOTIVE 2005 - 6011
DIST.COMP SPPLIS 1037 - 4840
SERVICE CONTRACT 1037 - 6030
DIST.COMP SPPLIS 2037 - 4840
SERVICE CONTRACT 2037 - 6030
SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 1022 - 6075
SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 2022 - 6075
02SYS/TMDL,ICR
PRINTING 1027 - 4920
PRINTING 2027 - 4920
PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 2001 - 6052
MISC INCOME
TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1021 - 6200
TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1037 - 6200
3
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL
Check Total:
Check Total:
2038 - 6660 - WCPROG
Check Total:
Check Total:
2000 - 3540 - TMCB
Check Total:
Current Date: 10
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
Amount Check Num Type
250.00 AP 00070932 MW
9,853.00
9 853.00 AP 00070933 MW
50.00
50.00
100.00 AP 00070934 MW
88.49
88.49 AP 00070935 MW
29.60
29.60 AP 00070936 MW
381.00
1,678.89
381.00
1,678.91
4119.80 AP 00070937 N1W
1,125.00
1,125.00
2 250.00 AP- 00070938 MW
433.00
433.00 AP- 00070939 MW
250.00
250.00
500.00 AP- 00070940 MW
997.00
997.00 AP 00070941 MW
9,600.00
9 600.00 AP 00070942 MW
54.49
54.49 AP 00070943 MW
423.57
211.79
Vendor Name
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER
CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LABS
CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LABS
CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LABS
CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LABS
CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LABS
DICK'S FULLER -
DOUZAS DISPOSAL
E- FILLIATE CORP
E- FILLIATE CORP
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ASSO
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ASSO
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
User: MICHAEL
Department / Proi Name
CUSTOMER SERVICE
FINANCE
ADMINISTRATION
INFORMATION SYS
CUSTOMER SERVICE
FINANCE
LABORATORY - ALP CO MTBE CONT
LABORATORY - DIESEL SPILL
LABORATORY - BEACON CONTAM
LABORATORY - BKRFLD TRTMT EXP
LABORATORY - HERBST
PUMPS
GEN & ADMIN
INFORMATION SYS
INFORMATION SYS
LABORATORY
LABORATORY
PUMPS
HEAVY MAINT
PUMPS
HEAVY MAINTENANC
LABORATORY
LABORATORY
LABORATORY
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Description
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
TRAVEUMEETINGS
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
TRAVEUMEETINGS
MONITORING
MONITORING
MONITORING
MONITORING
MONITORING
PUMP STATIONS
REFUSE DISPOSAL
DIST.COMP SPPLIS
DIST.COMP SPPLIS
LAB SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
SECONDARY EQUIP
SMALL TOOLS
BUILDINGS
LAB SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
REPL AUTOCLAVE
Page: 4
Acct# / Proi Code
1038 - 6200
1039 - 6200
2021 -6200
2037 - 6200
2038 - 6200
2039 - 6200
Check Total:
1007 - 6110 - ACMTBE
1007 - 6110 - DSPILL
2007 - 6110 - BEACON
2007 - 6110 - BKRFLD
2007 - 6110 - HERBST
Check Total:
2002 - 6051
1000 - 6370
1037 - 4840
2037 - 4840
1007 - 4760
2007 - 4760
1002 - 6073
1004 - 6022
2002 - 6073
2004 - 6041
1007 - 4760
2007 - 4760
2007 - 8958
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Current Date: 10/08/2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
Amount
635.35
211.79
423.57
211.79
635.35
211.79
2,965.00
340.00
170.00
190.00
340.00
720.00
1,760.00
96.31
96.31
25.15
25.15
Check Num Type
AP- 00070944
AP- 00070945
AP- 00070946
AP- 00070947
MW
MW
MW
MW
126.89
97.89
224.78 AP MW
47.43
29.00
76.43 AP 00070949 MW
29.63
43.21
29.62
28.96
131.42 AP 00070950 MW
415.31
537.48
284.00
1236.79 AP- 00070951 MW
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Prol Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
FOX OCCUPATIONAL MED CTR ELECTRICAL SHOP SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 1003 - 6075 77.50
FOX OCCUPATIONAL MED CTR ELECTRICAL SHOP SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 2003 - 6075 77.50
Check Total: 1.55.00 AP 00070952 MW'
FRYE, WILLIAM INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1037 - 6200 36.00
FRYE, WILLIAM INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2037 - 6200 36.00
Check Total: 72.00 AP 00070953 MW
GBC SCIENTIFIC EQUIP INC LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 30.00
GBC SCIENTIFIC EQUIP INC LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 45.00
Check Total: 75.00 AP 00070954 MW
GERLINGER STEEL HEAVY MAINT REPL BANDSAW 1004 - 8998 7,537.11
Check Total: 7,537.11 AP 00070955 MW
GFS CHEMICAL LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 75.68
GFS CHEMICAL LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 50.60
Check Total: 126.28 AP 00070956 MW
GRAINGER GEN & ADMIN SHOP SUPPLY INV 1000 - 0421 133.71
r
GRAI6IGER ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL O2SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 985.85
0
i
Check Total: 1,119.56 AP 00070957 MW
HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC CUSTOMER SERVICE EQUIP RENT /LEASE 1038 - 5020 122.57
HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC CUSTOMER SERVICE EQUIP RENT /LEASE 2038 - 5020 122.57
Check Total: 245.14 AP 00070958 MW
HENDERSON, DEBBIE FINANCE TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1039 - 6200 62.00
HENDERSON, DEBBIE FINANCE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2039 - 6200 62.00
Check Total: 124.00 AP 00070959 M\1'
HOGGATT, JIM GEN & ADMIN - NASTT 08 CONF MISC INCOME 1000 - 3540 - NASTO8 153.29
Check Total: 153.29 AP 00070960 MW
HUGHES, PAUL FINANCE TRAVEUMEETINGS 1039 - 6200 13.00
HUGHES, PAUL FINANCE TRAVEL /MEETINGS 2039 - 6200 13.00
Check Total: 26.00 AP 00070961 MW
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL ENGINEERING DUES /MEMB /CERT 1029 - 6250 30.00
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL ENGINEERING DUES /MEMB /CERT 2029 - 6250 30.00
Check Total: 60.00 AP 00070962 MW
User: MICHAEL
Page: 5 Current Date: 1008 2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
Vendor Name
INTERSTATE SAFETY & SUPPLY
INTERSTATE SAFETY & SUPPLY
INTERSTATE SAFETY & SUPPLY
JENSEN PRECAST
JENSEN PRECAST
JONES, MICHAEL
KAISER PERMANENTE
KELLEY EROSION CONTROL INC
KEN GRADY CO INC
KOFR•& ASSOCIATES INC
I
KOFF I & ASSOCIATES INC
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
LAKESIDE NAPA
User: MICHAEL
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK
Department / Proi Name
GEN & ADMIN
GEN & ADMIN
OPERATIONS
OPERATIONS
SELF FUNDED INS
EXPORT PIPELINE - B LINE REVEG
ENGINEERING - C CLUB TNK REPL
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
UNDERGROUND REP
PUMPS
PUMPS
HEAVY MAINT
EQUIPMENT REP
EQUIPMENT REP
ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL
UNDERGROUND REP
PUMPS
PUMPS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Description
SHOP SUPPLY INV
SAFETY INVENTORY
LAB SUPPLIES
UNDERGROUND REP - SAWMILL 2 EC PIPE /CVRS /MHLS
ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL O2SYS/TMDL,ICR
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
CLAIMS
BLINE REVEG
TANK, COUNTRY CL
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
SMALL TOOLS
SHOP SUPPLIES
UPGR FLL ES6,7 &9
SMALL TOOLS
AUTOMOTIVE
SHOP SUPPLIES
O2SYS/TMDL,ICR
SMALL TOOLS
WELLS
SHOP SUPPLIES
AUTOMOTIVE
SHOP SUPPLIES
Page: 6
Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
1000 - 0421 1,310.23
1000 - 0425 314.07
1006 - 4760 173.30
1797.60 AP 00070963 MW
1001 - 6052 - ECSAW2 316.79
1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 1,513.30
Check Total: 1 830.09 AP 00070964 MW
1006 - 6200 154.44
Check Total: 154.44 AP- 00070965 MW
3000 - 6745 577.00
Check Total: 577.00 AP 00070966 MW
9098 - 8736 - BLNVEG 29,340.00
Check Total: 29 340,00 AP 00070967 MW
2029 - 7063 - CLUBTK 1,911.70
1,911.70 AP 00070968 MW
1021 - 4405 665.00
2021 - 4405 665.00
Check Total: 1 330.00 AP 00070969 MW
1001 - 6073
1002 -6071
1002 - 8712
1004 - 6073
1005 - 6011
1005 - 6071
1029 - 8605 ICTMDL
2001 - 6073
2002 - 6050
2002 - 6071
2005 - 6011
2005 - 6071
Check Total:
Check Total:
Current Date:
Current Time:
10/08;2008
14:18:50
18.97
20.87
77.19
370.69
1,230.92
34.71
429.63
73.24
64.62
20.86
2,087.42
34.69
Vendor Name
Les Schwab Tires
Les Schwab Tires
LES SCHWAB WAREHOUSE
LONG, WES
MC GEE PLUMBING & HEATING
MC MASTER CARR SUPPLY CO
MC MASTER CARR SUPPLY CO
McINTYRE, ROBERT
McINT ROBERT
I
McINTARE, ROBERT
N
McINTYRE, ROBERT
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
MEEKS BUILDING CENTER
Department / Proi Name
EQUIPMENT REP
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
GEN & ADMIN - T &M CASH BRD
DIAMOND VLY RNCH
ENGINEERING
PUMPS
PUMPS
GEN & ADMIN
GEN & ADMIN
GEN & ADMIN
GEN & ADMIN
UNDERGROUND REP
PUMPS
PUMPS
HEAVY MAINT
HEAVY MAINT
HEAVY MAINT
DIAMOND VLY RNCH
ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL
UNDERGROUND REP
UNDERGROUND REP
PUMPS
PUMPS
HEAVY MAINTENANC
User: MICHAEL Page:
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Description
Acct# / Proi Code
AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011
AUTOMOTIVE 2005 - 6011
MISC INCOME
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
MISC LIAB CLAIMS
SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 1002 - 6075
UPGR FLL ES6,7 &9 1002 - 8712
UB SUSPENSE 1000 - 2002
UB SUSPENSE 2000 - 2002
NEW SERV /ADMIN 2000 - 3530
METER SALE 2000 - 3545
2000 - 3540 - TMCB
Check Total:
1028 - 6200
Check Total:
2029 - 4520
Check Total:
SHOP SUPPLIES 1001 - 6071
PUMP STATIONS 1002 - 6051
SMALL TOOLS 1002 - 6073
GROUNDS & MNTC 1004 - 6042
SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071
SMALL TOOLS 1004 - 6073
GROUNDS & MNTC 1028 - 6042
O2SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 ICTMDL
PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 2001 - 6052
SMALL TOOLS 2001 - 6073
WELLS 2002 - 6050
SMALL TOOLS 2002 - 6073
BUILDINGS 2004 - 6041
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Current Date:
Current Time:
10 08 2008
14 18:50
Amount Check Num Type
4,463.81 AP 00070971 MW
695.56
662.13
1,357.69 AP 000 MW
754.00
754.00 AP 00070973 MW
134.55
134.55 AP 00070974 MW
377.99
377.99 AP 00070975 MW
847.75
913.52
1761.27 AP 00070976 MW
11,322.12
4,161.88
150.00
286.00
15,920.00 AP 00070977 MW
7.39
72.40
32.32
130.27
71.12
80.39
15.39
978.66
10.69
44.58
37.78
32.30
97.36
1,610.65 AP- 00070978 MW
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
MORAIDA, CHRIS PUMPS DUES /MEMB /CERT 2002 - 6250 90.00
Check Total: 90.00 AP 00070979 MW
MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO HEAVY MAINT SMALL TOOLS 1004 - 6073 207.24
Check Total: 207.24 AP 00070980 MW
NASTT GEN & ADMIN - NASTT 08 CONF MISC INCOME 1000 - 3540 - NAST08 10,350.00
Check Total: 10 350.00 AP 00070981 MW
NELS TAHOE HARDWARE PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002 - 6071 17.23
NELS TAHOE HARDWARE PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 10.10
NELS TAHOE HARDWARE PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002 - 6071 8
NELS TAHOE HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005 - 6011 3.40
Check Total: 38.80 AP 00070982 MW
NETVAD INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 1037 - 4405 775.00
NETVAD INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 2037 - 4405 775.00
NETVAD INFORMATION SYS UPGR SFWR FRWALL 2037 - 8895 1,850.00
I
Check Total: 3 400.00 AP- 00070983 MW
NOVA1YNX CORP LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 374.43
w
NOVALYNX CORP LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 386.27
Check Total: 760.70 AP 00070984 MW
OFFICE MAX ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 1021 - 4820 9.99
OFFICE MAX ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 1029 - 4820 35.36
OFFICE MAX FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1039 - 4820 12.59
OFFICE MAX ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 2021 - 4820 9.94
OFFICE MAX ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 2029 - 4820 35.35
OFFICE MAX FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2039 - 4820 12.60
Check Total: 115.83 AP 00070985 MW
OLIN CORPORATION OPERATIONS HYPOCHLORITE 1006 - 4755 4,002.49
Check Total: 4002.49 AP 00070986 MW
ONTRAC LABORATORY POSTAGE EXPENSES 1007 - 4810 37.25
ONTRAC LABORATORY - HERBST POSTAGE EXPENSES 2007 - 4810 - HERBST 8.50
ONTRAC LABORATORY POSTAGE EXPENSES 2007 - 4810 4.75
Check Total: 50.50 AP 00070987 MW
User: MICHAEL
Page: 8 Current Date: 10'08/2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14: 18:50
Vendor Name
PAPA Membership
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
DIAMOND VLY RNCH DUES /MEMB /CERT 1028 - 6250 40.00
Check Total: 40.00 AP 00070988 MW
PRAXAIR 174 PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002 - 6071 33.44
PRAXAIR 174 HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 321.24
PRAXAIR 174 LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 52.32
PRAXAIR 174 ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL 02SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 344.25
PRAXAIR 174 PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002 - 6071 33.44
PRAXAIR 174 LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 52.32
Check Total: 837.01 AP 00070989 MW
QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEMS INC HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004 - 6041 850.00
Check Total: 850.00 AP 00070990 MW
RADIO SHACK PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002 - 6073 4.85
RADIO SHACK ELECTRICAL SHOP BUILDINGS 1003 - 6041 10.75
RADIO SHACK PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002 - 6073 4.84
RADIO SHACK ELECTRICAL SHOP BUILDINGS 2003 - 6041 21.53
c,, Check Total: 41.97 AP 00070991 MW
RED WING SHOE STORE PUMPS SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 1002 - 6075 87.01
RED WING SHOE STORE PUMPS SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 2002 - 6075 87.00
Check Total: 174.01 AP 00070992 MW'
RICK MARTIN CONTRUSTION GEN & ADMIN HYDRANT PERMITS 2000 - 3529 1,486.20
Check Total: 1,486.20 AP 00070993 MW
ROMTEC ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL 02SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 35,390.21
Check Total: 35 390.21 AP 00070994 MW
RYAN, JULIE ENGINEERING TRAVEUMEETINGS 1029 - 6200 31.89
RYAN, JULIE ENGINEERING TRAVEUMEETINGS 2029 - 6200 31.88
Check Total: 63.77 AP 00070995 MW
SANDHU, HARBHAJAN S. GEN & ADMIN UB SUSPENSE 1000 - 2002 11,354.24
SANDHU, HARBHAJAN S. FINANCE INTEREST EXPENSE 1039 - 6710 1,050.27
SANDHU, HARBHAJAN S. GEN & ADMIN UB SUSPENSE 2000 - 2002 2,239.00
SANDHU, HARBHAJAN S. GEN & ADMIN METER SALE 2000 - 3545 132.00
SANDHU, HARBHAJAN S. FINANCE INTEREST EXPENSE 2039 - 6710 219.32
User: MICHAEL
Page: 9 Current Date: 10 08.2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
Check Total: 14 994.83 AP- 00070996 MW
SAVANCE LLC INFORMATION SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 1037 - 6030 62.50
SAVANCE LLC INFORMATION SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 2037 - 6030 62.50
Check Total: 125.00 AP- 00070997 MW
SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002 - 6071 9
SCOTTYS HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REP SHOP SUPPLIES 1005 - 6071 2.04
SCOTTYS HARDWARE LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 19.39
SCOTTYS HARDWARE UNDERGROUND REP SMALL TOOLS 2001 - 6073 45.18
SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002 - 6071 9.71
SCOTTYS HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SHOP SUPPLIES 2005 - 6071 2.03
SCOTTYS HARDWARE LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 19.38
Check Total: 107.45 AP- 00070998 MW
SHARP, KATHY ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1021 - 6200 45.00
SHARP, KATHY ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2021 - 6200 45.00
Check Total: 90.00 AP- 00070999 MW
SIER6 CHEMICAL CO PUMPS HYPOCHLORITE 2002 - 4755 1,655.44
Lri
Check Total: 1 655.44 AP- 00071000 MW
SIERRA FOOTHILL LABORATORY ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL 02SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 390.00
Check Total: 390.00 AP 00071001 MW
SIERRA NEVADA CLASSIFIEDS DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 1027 - 6620 - PREEXT 452.81
SIERRA NEVADA CLASSIFIEDS DIO - PR EXP - EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 2027 - 6620 - PREEXT 452.81
SIERRA NEVADA CLASSIFIEDS CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 452.81
Check Total: _ 1_358.43 AP 00071002 MW
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER GEN & ADMIN ELECTRICITY 1000 - 6330 76,697.06
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER GEN & ADMIN ST LIGHTING EXP 1000 - 6740 1,393.51
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER GEN & ADMIN ELECTRICITY 2000 - 6330 35,038.83
Check Total: 113129.40 AP 00071004 MW
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER CO ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL 02SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 14,790.00
Check Total: 14,790.00 AP 00071003 MW
SIERRA SPRINGS GEN & ADMIN SAFETY INVENTORY 1000 - 0425 964.80
SIERRA SPRINGS UNDERGROUND REP SUPPLIES 1001 - 6520 73.15
User: MICHAEL
Page: 10 Current Date: 10 %08 2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
Vendor Name
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SIERRA SPRINGS
SOUND STRATEGIES /OFC INC.
SOUND STRATEGIES /OFC INC.
SOUTtI SHORE MOTORS
S01.11 SHOREMOTORS
SOUTH TAHOE PUB UTILITY DIST
SOUTH TAHOE REFUSE
SOUTH TAHOE REFUSE
SOUTH TAHOE REFUSE
SOUTHWEST GAS
SOUTHWEST GAS
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
Department I Proi Name
ELECTRICAL SHOP
HEAVY MAINT
EQUIPMENT REP
OPERATIONS
DIAMOND VLY RNCH
CUSTOMER SERVICE
UNDERGROUND REP
ELECTRICAL SHOP
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
CUSTOMER SERVICE
CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS
DIO
DIO
EQUIPMENT REP
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
GEN & ADMIN - T &M CASH BRD
GEN & ADMIN
GEN & ADMIN
PUMPS
GEN & ADMIN
GEN & ADMIN
UNDERGROUND REP
ENGINEERING - COLL SYS MASTER
ENGINEERING - FS EASEMENTS
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING - EFFLUENT EVAL
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
User: MICHAEL Page: 11
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK
Description
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
AUTOMOTIVE
AUTOMOTIVE
MISC INCOME
REFUSE DISPOSAL
REFUSE DISPOSAL
GROUNDS & MNTC
NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
REP EXP PUMPS
Acct# / Proi Code
1003 - 6520
1004 - 6520
1005 - 6520
1006 - 6520
1028 - 6520
1038 - 6520
2001 - 6520
2003 - 6520
2005 - 6520
2038 - 6520
2038 - 6660 WCPROG
Check Total:
1027 - 4405
2027 - 4405
1005 - 6011
2005 - 6011
2000 - 3540 - TMCB
Check Total:
1000 - 6370
2000 - 6370
2002 - 6042
1000 - 6350
2000 - 6350
1001 - 4405
1029 - 4405 - CSMSPL
1029 - 4405 - FSESMT
1029 -4405
1029 - 8676 - EFFLEV
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Current Date:
Current Time:
1008,2008
14:15:50
Amount Check Num Type
22.87
68.61
22.87
68.61
22.87
22.87
86.92
22.87
22.87
22.87
77.66
1 .84 AP-00071005 MW
49.00
49.00
98.00 AP- 00071006 MW
15.24
15.23
30.47 AP-00071007 MW
746.00
746.00 AP- 00071008 MW
3,036.60
298.26
32.30
3,367.16 AP 00071009 MW
1,311.37
143.12
1,454.49 AP 00071010 MW
3,760.00
182.80
274.20
68.55
76.40
Vendor Name
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL &
TAHOE BASIN CONTAINER SERVICE
TAHOE BASIN CONTAINER SERVICE
TAHOE FENCE CO INC
TAHOE PRINTING
TAHOE PRINTING
TAHOE PRINTING
TAHCg PRINTING
TAHOE PRINTING
TAHOE PRINTING
TAHOE SAND & GRAVEL
TAHOE SAND & GRAVEL
TAHOE TRADING POST
TRPA
TURNER & ASSOCIATES INC
U S BANK CORPORATE
U S BANK CORPORATE
U S BANK CORPORATE
U S BANK CORPORATE
User: MICHAEL
Report: OH _PMT_C LAIM S_BK
Department / Proi Name
UNDERGROUND REP
ENGINEERING - CTC GRNT -BMPs
ENGINEERING - FS EASEMENTS
ENGINEERING - WTRLN, JULIE LN
ENGINEERING - WTRLN,AL TAHOE
ENGINEERING - WTRLN, TATA
GEN & ADMIN
OPERATIONS
DIAMOND VLY RNCH
LABORATORY
ADMINISTRATION
FINANCE
LABORATORY
ADMINISTRATION
FINANCE
HEAVY MAINT
UNDERGROUND REP
UNDERGROUND REP
ENGINEERING - ARSENIC STUDY
ENGINEERING - COLL SYS MASTER
GEN & ADMIN - NASTT 08 CONF
UNDERGROUND REP
UNDERGROUND REP
PUMPS
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Description
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICE
WTRLN, JULIE
WTLN, AL TAHOE
WTRLN, TATA LN
REFUSE DISPOSAL 1000 - 6370
SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1006 - 6652
GROUNDS & MNTC 1028 - 6042
OFFICE SUPPLIES 1007 - 4820
PRINTING 1021 - 4920
PRINTING 1039 - 4920
OFFICE SUPPLIES 2007 - 4820
PRINTING 2021 - 4920
PRINTING 2039 - 4920
GROUNDS & MNTC 1004 - 6042
PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 2001 - 6052
SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 2001 - 6075
ARSNC TRTMNT
COLL SYS MST PLN
MISC INCOME
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL/MEETINGS
STANDBY ACCOMODA
Page: 12
Acct# / Proi Code
2001 - 4405
2029 - 4405 - CTCBMP
2029 - 4405 - FSESMT
2029 - 7067 - JULIE7
2029 - 8811 - ATWL08
2029 - 8866 - TATAWL
Check Total:
1000 - 3540 - NASTO8
1001 - 4820
1001 - 6200
1002 - 6083
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
2029 - 8864 - ARSNIC
Check Total:
1029 - 8721 - CSMSPL
Check Total:
Current Date: 10,'08'2008
Current Time: 14:18:50
Amount Check Num Type
2,916.13
114.25
274.20
133.70
47.75
28.65
7 876.63 AP 00071011 MW
325.88
9,585.00
9,910.88 AP 00071012 MW
880.00
880.00 AP- 00071013 MW
9.42
9.43
11.72
9.42
9.43
11.72
61.14 AP- 00071014 MW
111.00
2.739.30
2,850.30 AP- 00071015 MW
164.86
164.86 AP- 00071016 MW
2,888.00
2888.00 AP-00071017 MW
9,900.00
9,900.00 AP- 00071018 MW
438.46
173.40
805.33
153.72
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
U S BANK CORPORATE PUMPS TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1002 - 6200 225.00
U S BANK CORPORATE PUMPS DUES /MEMB /CERT 1002 - 6250 396.00
U S BANK CORPORATE HEAVY MAINT PUMP STATIONS 1004 - 6051 191.54
U S BANK CORPORATE HEAVY MAINT TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1004 - 6200 69.07
U S BANK CORPORATE EQUIPMENT REP OFFICE SUPPLIES 1005 - 4820 109.90
U S BANK CORPORATE EQUIPMENT REP TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1005 - 6200 56.01
U S BANK CORPORATE OPERATIONS TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1006 - 6200 564.48
U S BANK CORPORATE LABORATORY LABORATORY EQUIP 1007 - 6025 9.38
U S BANK CORPORATE LABORATORY TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1007 - 6200 255.55
U S BANK CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1021 - 6200 48.05
U S BANK CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 1021 - 6621 65.42
U S BANK CORPORATE HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL EXPENS 1022 - 6670 199.81
U S BANK CORPORATE DIO AUDIOVISUAL 1027 - 4940 24.17
U S BANK CORPORATE DIO TRAVEUMEETINGS 1027 - 6200 129.63
U S BANK CORPORATE DIAMOND VLY RNCH TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1028 - 6200 2,629.46
U S liANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1029 - 6200 628.28
w
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING - FS EASEMENTS SUPPLIES 1029 - 6520 - FSESMT 97.50
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 1029 - 6520 10.77
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL O2SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 249.99
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING - DVR EIR DIAM VLY MP /EIR 1029 - 8725 - DVREIR 61.00
U S BANK CORPORATE INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1037 - 6200 342.71
U S BANK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE POSTAGE EXPENSES 1038 - 4810 4.84
U S BANK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1038 - 4820 195.43
U S BANK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEL /MEETINGS 1038 - 6200 32.50
U S BANK CORPORATE FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1039 - 4820 26.39
U S BANK CORPORATE FINANCE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1039 - 6200 103.54
U S BANK CORPORATE FINANCE SUPPLIES 1039 - 6520 36.32
U S BANK CORPORATE UNDERGROUND REP DUES /MEMB /CERT 2001 - 6250 70.00
U S BANK CORPORATE PUMPS STANDBY ACCOMODA 2002 - 6083 153.71
U S BANK CORPORATE EQUIPMENT REPAIR OFFICE SUPPLIES 2005 - 4820 109.90
U S BANK CORPORATE EQUIPMENT REPAIR TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2005 - 6200 56.00
U S BANK CORPORATE LABORATORY LABORATORY EQUIP 2007 - 6025 9.38
User: MICHAEL
Page: 13 Current Date: 10'08 2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14.1850
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
U S BANK CORPORATE LABORATORY TRAVEUMEETINGS 2007 - 6200 255.55
U S BANK CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2021 - 6200 48.03
U S BANK CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 2021 - 6621 65.42
U S BANK CORPORATE HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL EXPENS 2022 - 6670 199.81
U S BANK CORPORATE DIO AUDIO/VISUAL 2027 - 4940 24.17
U S BANK CORPORATE DIO TRAVEL /MEETINGS 2027 - 6200 129.62
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING TRAVEL /MEETINGS 2029 - 6200 1,187.26
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING DUES /MEMB /CERT 2029 - 6250 72.00
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING FS EASEMENTS SUPPLIES 2029 - 6520 - FSESMT 97.50
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 2029 - 6520 10.76
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING - C CLUB TNK REPL TANK, COUNTRY CL 2029 - 7063 - CLUBTK 42.00
U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING - TWIN PEAKS BS BSTR, TWN PEAKS 2029 - 7070 - TPBSTR 25.00
U S BANK CORPORATE INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL /MEETINGS 2037 - 6200 342.70
U S BANK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE POSTAGE EXPENSES 2038 - 4810 4.84
U S BANK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2038 - 4820 195.42
U S B,IINK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2038 - 6200 32.50
L..)
U S BANK CORPORATE FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2039 - 4820 26.39
U S BANK CORPORATE FINANCE TRAVEUMEETINGS 2039 - 6200 103.52
U S BANK CORPORATE FINANCE SUPPLIES 2039 - 6520 36.32
Check Total: 11631.45 AP 00071021 MW
URGENT CARE NW FINANCE SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 1039 - 6075 63.00
URGENT CARE NW FINANCE SAFETY /EQUIP /PHY 2039 - 6075 63.00
Check Total: 126.00 AP 00071022 MW
USA BLUE BOOK PUMPS UPGR FLL ES6,7 &9 1002 - 8712 396.01
USA BLUE BOOK OPERATIONS LAB SUPPLIES 1006 - 4760 14.84
USA BLUE BOOK OPERATIONS GROUNDS & MNTC 1006 - 6042 64.99
USA BLUE BOOK PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 394.83
Check Total: 870.67 AP 00071023 MW
VERIZON DIAMOND VLY RNCH TELEPHONE 1028 - 6310 40.82
VWR INTERNATIONAL
VWR INTERNATIONAL
User: MICHAEL
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK
LABORATORY
LABORATORY
Check Total: 40,82 AP 00071024 MW
LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 242.10
LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 258.23
Page: 14
Current Date: 10i08/2008
Current Time: 14:18:50
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Type
Check Total: 500.33 AP 00071025 MW
WECO INDUSTRIES INC UNDERGROUND REP PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 1001 - 6052 1,167.42
WECO INDUSTRIES INC UNDERGROUND REP ROOT SAW 1001 - 7564 3,479.44
Check Total: 4,646.86 AP 00071026 MW
WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP BUILDINGS 1003 - 6041 11.69
WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SHOP SUPPLIES 1003 - 6071 169.04
WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SMALL TOOLS 1003 - 6073 67.06
WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP RPR /MNTC WTR TKS 2003 - 6054 1,249.85
WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SHOP SUPPLIES 2003 - 6071 169.04
Check Total: 1_666.68 AP 00071027 MW
WESTERN BOTANICAL SERVICES EXPORT PIPELINE - B LINE REVEG BLINE REVEG 9098 - 8736 - BLNVEG 2,960.00
Check Total: 2 960.00 AP 00071028 MW
WESTERN ENERGETIX INC GEN & ADMIN GASOLINE INV 1000 - 0415 3,222.75
WESTERN ENERGETIX INC GEN & ADMIN DIESEL INVENTORY 1000 - 0416 10,649.57
I Check Total: 13 872_32 AP 00071029 MW
I
WES o RN ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY MONITORING 1007 - 6110 960.00
i
Check Total: 960.00 AP 00071030 MW
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY UNDERGROUND REP SHOP SUPPLIES 1001 - 6071 286.46
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 1002 - 6051 301.16
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS UPGR FLL ES6,7 &9 1002 - 8712 164.60
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY HEAVY MAINT GROUNDS & MNTC 1004 - 6042 797.47
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY UNDERGROUND REP PIPE /CVRS /MHLS 2001 - 6052 3,573.31
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY UNDERGROUND REP SMALL TOOLS 2001 - 6073 178.73
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 70.08
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002 - 6051 175.59
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY CUSTOMER SERVICE SHOP SUPPLIES 2038 - 6071 158.39
WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY CUSTOMER SERVICE LARGE WTR MTRS 2038 - 8974 1,724.00
Check Total: 7,429.79 AP MW
WHALEN, CHRIS ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1021 - 6200 20.33
WHALEN, CHRIS ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2021 - 6200 20.32
Check Total: 40.65 AP 0007I032 MW
WHITE CAP ENGINEERING - ICR TMDL O2SYS/TMDL,ICR 1029 - 8605 - ICTMDL 610.05
User: MICHAEL Page: 15 Current Date: 10'08 2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description
XEROX CORP UNDERGROUND REP SERVICE CONTRACT
XEROX CORP EQUIPMENT REP SERVICE CONTRACT
XEROX CORP UNDERGROUND REP SERVICE CONTRACT
XEROX CORP EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE CONTRACT
ZELLMER, DAVE
User: MICHAEL
DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS & MNTC
Acct# / Proi Code
1001 - 6030
1005 - 6030
2001 - 6030
2005 - 6030
1028 - 6042
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
Grand Total:
538'033'71+
537'830 • 7 1 *-1-
Page: 16 Current Date: 10/08/2008
Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 14:18:50
Amount Check Num Type
610.05 AP 00071033 MW
16.89
12.40
16.89
12.39
58.57 AP 00071034 MW
5,000.00
5,000.00 AP 00071035 MW
538,033.71
0•T
South Tahoe P.U.D
FRI, CXT 03, 2008, 2:47 Fig! ---r 03 08 ----leg: 1
Check Payee J. Payee Na re
e5:
PS00070843 V48091
L INC.
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written
Total Void Haul Written
Total Machine Written
Total Hand Written
Total ReversaLS
Total Cstnoelled
GRAND TOTAL
war), TYPED & REVERSED A/P
GL OL - - - lo: �1TE---- j oobb: 420769
Date Check knount Type Subs
10/02/08 203.00 RV TR
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
203.00
0.00
203.00
CHECK IMILSIER. Pa 1
4 EE200 <1.19> rpt id: C --
Pel To Note
Reversed
Number of Checks accessed:
Nuricer of Checks Processed:
Nuriber of Checks Processed:
Nutter of Checks Processed:
Number of Checks Processed:
Nures of Checks accessed:
0
0
0
0
1
0
(Jenl'ral Manaqer
f'.ichard H, Solbr113
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Dln'lCWI"li>
Ernie Claudio
Jilmc;; R. Jon~
Milry Lou MO$bacher
Dale Riee
Eric Schafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South lake Tahoe · CA 96150
Phone 530 544-6474 · fax 550541-0614
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager
MEETING DATE: October 16,2008
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing
litigation: Meyers Landfill Site - United States of America vs. EI Dorado County and City
of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No. S-01-1520 LKK
GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CATEGORY: Sewer
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO
-143-
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Recycled Water Facilities Draft Master Plan
Draft SlJllmary Presenation
Presented by Eric McGrath, P,E,
Stantec Con9.Jlting, Inc,
October 16,2008
District Board Room, South Lake Ta i1Ile , CA
October 17,2008
Turtle Rod< Park, Alpine Coun~, CA
South Tllho, Public U~hty Dillrd
R.cyd.d~l.tF.cilili..OtItt~a~t...Plan
Sild,'
Background and Study Area
. Background
- 1967 - Agreement Between Alpine County and the South
Tahoe PUD
- 1968 - Indian Creek Reservoir Construction
- 1972 - Diamond Ditch Agreement
- 1983 - Harvey P lace Res ervoir Agreement
- 1988 - Harvey P lace Res ervoir Construction
. Study Area
- Northern Alpine County
- Western Bo undary
- Eastern Boundary
- Northern Boundary
- Southern Boundary
SoulhhholPublil:UblityDlllrd
Recycle<tWlltlr FaClllli.. Drltt Ma~I",Plan
Presentation Overview
Background and Study Area
Recycled Water Operations and Facilities
Freshwater Operations and Facilities
Regulatory Overview
Master Plan Purpose, Need and Objectives
Development of the Master Plan
Master Plan Findings
Recycled Water Quality and Flow
Terminology
Recycled Water Infrastructure Projects
Recycled Water Management Projects
Freshwater Infrastructure Projects
Freshwater Management Projects
Future Projects
Environmental Impact Report
Master Plan Implementation
South Tahoe Public Utility Di.lri~1
RecycllldWal..,FaclhbllsOfallt.!d,IIlff'I,llL
Recycled Water Operations and
Facilities
. Historic - Indian Creek Reservoir and Indian
Creek
. Current - Harvey Place Reservoir and the
Diamond Ditch
. Use. Irrigation of Six Separate Ranches
. Benefits - Reuse of Recycled Water, Source of
Water Supply for Alpine County Agriculture
Soulh Tllholl Public Utility Distrid
RecyclldWalarFacllIll" DranMast"'PI~n
1
Freshwater Operations and
Facilities
. Historic - None
. Current - Snowshoe Thompg:m and Other
Ditches and Indian Creek ReS3rvoir
. Use - Freshwater Conveyance and Storage
. Benefits - Recreational Ameni~ (Fishing,
Camping, Wildlife Viewing, Hiking)
SouthTahol Public UlIIlrty 0151rl:I
RecycllclWiltlf F~cililie' Dflitt.last..r Plan
Master Plan Purpose, Need and
Objectives
. Long Term Planning for District Operations
. Impacts of Availability of Land, Encroaching
Development
. Expiring Contracts
. Environmental Protection and Enhancement
. Emergency Disposal Improvement
. Operational Control Improvement
. Conveyance Capacity Improvement
. Regulatory Compliance (Recycled Water Reuse,
Fresh Water Quality)
SoLrth Tahoe Pllblic Ulil~y Oislrd
RecycledWlltl,Flc'lih., DutllAast'" Plan
Slid. 7
Regulatory Overview
. Regulatory and Permitting Bodies
- U,S, Environmental Protection Agency
- Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board
- Alpine County Board of County Supervisors
- U,S, Bureau of Land Management
- United States Forest Service
. Regulatory Requirements
- Federal Clean Water Act
- California Water Code
. Porter-Cologne Act
. RWQCB's
- California Code of Regulations
. Title 22 (regulates production and use of recycled water)
. Title 17 (protection of drinking water supply)
South Teho. Public Utility District
RacycledWallr FIClhtlu Draft Md,lar f'ldn
Development of the Master Plan
. Initial Draft (2001)
. Diamond Valley Ranch Purchase (2002 - 2006)
. Resumption of Master Planning (2007)
. Administrative Draft (2008)
SOlllh TahoePubhc UtllilyDislflct
RecycledWliIl"rFecllIll&,DrlnMd"8I1'Ian
,
2
Master Plan Findings
. Harvey Place Reservoir Ca pacity
. Recycled Water Application Acreage
- Currently Permitted Acreage
- Actual Acreage Irrigated
- Future Irrigated Acreage R=quired
SouthhhoePubhcUlility Di5lrlol
RecydedlNllter FilClllUIS Driltt Ma'l.... Plan
Slid" 9
Terminology
. EIR Terminology
- Alternatives
. #1 - No Project
. #2 - The Master Plan Project
- Project Components
- Future Componmts
. Master Plan Terminology
- Projects (26 total)
- Recornmended Projects (8 total)
- Contingent Projects (12 tobl)
- Future Projects (6 total)
SaulhT.hoe Public Utility Dlsltl:t
RecycledVlhlt"r FeCIII!IU Drall Madill Plall
Recycled Water Quality and Flow
Filtered, Disinfected Secondary 23
Current Daily Average Flow Rate - 4.4 mgd
Current Annual HPR Inflow Volurne - 4.873 acre-feet
Current Annual HPR Outflow Volume - 4738 acre-feet
Estimated Future Daily Average Flow Rate - 5,8 mgd
Estimated Future Annual Harvey Place Reservoir Inflow -
6,498 acre-feet
Estimated Future Annual Harvey Place Outflow -
5848 acre-feet
Flow Rate Trend
Soulh Tahoe Public Utility Dislrict
RecycledWalerFacilltluDranMil,t..PI"<I
Recycled Water Infrastructure Projects
Recommended Projects
- Project No, 1 - Recycled Water Irrigation Fields on Diamond Valley
Ranch
- Project No.2 - Harvey Place Reservoir Bypass Pipelines and Ditches
- Project No. 3 ~ Diamond Valley Ranch Irrigation Fields Pump Back
Station
- Project No, 4 - Diamond Valley Freshwater/Recycled Water Irrigation
System
- Project NO.5 - Diamond Ditch Conveyance Improvements
- Project No, 6 - Waterfall Pipeline Forebay and Pipeline
Contingent Projects
- Project No, 7 - District Pasture Subsurface Irrigation Pilot Project
- Project No.8 - West Fork Pipeline
- Project No, 9 - On-F arm Pipeline
- Project No, 10 - Wade Valley Pipeline
SoulhTilhoe Public Utility Dislrict
Recycled Water Facilllie~ Omfl MdSlllt Pia"
3
Recycled Water Management Projects
. Recommended Projects
- Project No, 11 - Prepare Nutrient
Management Plans
-Project No. 12- Permitting for RecycledWater
Use in Diamond Valley
. Contingent Project
- Project No. 13 - Make Recycled Water
Available to Irrigators in
Nevada
ScuthTloo, Public Utility O1lln::t
RlcycledWatlrFacilili., OrattMast91 Plan
Slid. 13
Freshwater Management Projects
. Recommended Projects - None
. Contingent Projects
- Project No. 19 - Use Mud Lake Winter Flows
for Indian Creek Reservoir
Flushing
- Project No, 20 - Storage of Water for
Downstream Users
$lluthhho,PublicUUlityDialn:;!
Recyclld Water Facilitie, O,II't MaM.. PI~n
Freshwater Infrastructure Projects
. Recommended Projects - None
. Contingent Projects
- Project No, 14 - Snowshoe Thompson No, 1
Conveyance Capacity Improvements
- Project No 15 - Upper Dressler Ditch Conveyance
Improvements
- Project No, 16 - Indian Creek Treatment Wetlands
- Project No, 17 - Diversion Ditch for Stormwater Flow
Away from Harvey Place Reservoir and
to Indian Creek Reservoir
- Project No, 18 -Indian Creek Reservoir Spillway
Channel
;,:,
SoulhT.hol PlIbhcUtllrtyOlslrict
Recycled Watll' Facilities Olin Ma,t... PI~"
Future Projects
. Project No, 21 - Develop Recycled Water
Wholesale Program
. Project No, 22 - Biosolids Composting
. Project No, 23 - Become a Water Rights BUYff /
Broker
. Project No, 24 - Power Generation
. Project No, 25 - Extend C-Line to Nevada State
Line
. Project No. 26 - Injection Well Program
South Tahoe Public Ublily Distn::1
RlcycllldWale/Facilitil& O,III'tMa'I",PI""
4
Environmental Impact Report
. California Environmental Quality Act
. Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
. Environmental Impacts
- Groundwater Quality
- Surface Water Quality
- Public Health and Safety
Soulh Taho. Pllblic UtllrtyDislfict
R..:...c1li1dWal.rF.cililjnDf..ft~a"llllPlan
Slide 17
Master Plan Implementation
. Capital Improvement Plan
. Contingent Project Triggers and Decision
Tree
. Diamond Valley Ranch Lan d Use
Strategies
South Tahoe Public Utility DI~tn:t
RecycludWate, Facilities Dr<l't Ma,l..r PI"n
5
DRAFT
FINAL REPORT
TOTAL COMPENSATION STUDY
FOR THE
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
September 2008
KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6400 Hollis Street
Suite 5
Emeryville, CA 94608
510.658.KOFF (5633) - voice
1.800.514.5195 toll-free
510.652.KOFF (5633) - fax
September 25,2008
Ms. Nancy Hussmann
Human Resources Director
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Dear Ms. Hussmann:
KoiT & Associates, Inc. is pleased to present the final total compensation report for the
study of all management classifications for the South Tahoe Public Utility District. This
report documents the total compensation study process and provides findings and
recommendations.
We would like to thank you, Richard Solbrig, the management committee, and other
District staff tor all the assistance and cooperation, without which this study could not
have been brought to its successful completion. We have created a compensation plan
that, when finally implemented, will bring the District's compensation program into an
externally competitive and internally equitable status.
We will be glad to answer any questions or clarify any points as you are implementing
the findings and recommendations. It was a pleasure working with your District and we
look forward to future opportunities to provide you with professional assistance.
Very truly yours,
'91S'~
Georg S. Krammer
Chief Executive Officer
DRAFT
FINAL REPORT
TOTAL COMPENSATION STUDY
FOR THE
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Background .............. .................................................................................1
Study Process.............................,..............................................................2
Market Total Compensation Findings......................................................8
Internal Salary Relationships.................................................................... 9
Recommendations................................................................................... 1 0
Additional Benefits Information........................................................... ..11
Appendix I - Side-by-Side Comparison
Appendix II - Market Base Salary, Benefit, and Total Compensation Findings
Appendix III - Proposed Monthly Salary Plan
Appendix IV - Proposed Salary Range Placement
Appendix V - Additional Benefits Information
DRAFT
FINAL REPORT
TOTAL COMPENSATION STUDY
FOR THE
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
BACKGROUND
In April 2008, the South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD) contracted with Koff &
Associates, Inc. to conduct a total compensation study for all of the District's management
classilications. All compensation findings and implementation recommendations are
documented in this report.
This compensation review process was precipitated by:
'r Discussions and agreement with the District management team that a compensation study
should be conducted in order to ensure that the District was competitive with its labor
market:
)- The agreement of management and the Board of Directors that employees should be
recognized for the level and scope of work performed and that they are paid on a fair and
competitive basis that allows the District to recruit and retain a high-quality staff;
)- The desire to have a compensation plan that can meet the needs of this District; and
,.. The desire to ensure that internal relationships of salaries are based upon objective, non-
quantitative evaluation factors, resulting in equity across all District departments.
Classification, in itself: is a non-quantitative method of job evaluation. In determining the
classification plan structure and the proper allocation of each position, factors are considered
such as:
)r Education and experience requirements;
,.. Knowledge and skill required to perform the work;
)- The scope and complexity of the work;
;.... The authority delegated to make decisions and take action;
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 2 of 11
~ The responsibility for the work of others, program administration, and budget dollars;
~ Problem solving/ingenuity;
~ Contacts with others (both inside and outside of the organization);
~ Consequences of action and decisions; and
~ Working conditions.
These factors were used in determining both appropriate external market comparisons and
internal compensation relationships as well as providing the basis for the findings and
recommendations outlined in this report.
In addition, when considering an appropriate salary range level, there are certain standard human
resources practices that are normally applied, as follows:
'r A salary within 5% of the average or median is considered to be competitive in the labor
market for salary survey purposes because of the differences in compensation policy and
actual scope of work and position requirements. However, the District can adopt a closer
standard.
'r Certain internal percentages are often applied. Those that are the most common are:
.:. The differential between the entry-level and journey-level class in a series (Jln or
Trainee/Experienced) is generally 5% to 15%;
.:. A lead or advanced journey-level (III or Senior-level) position is generally placed
5% to 15% above the lower experienced level; and
.:. A full supervisory position is normally placed at least 10% to 20% above the
highest level supervised, depending upon the breadth and scope of supervision.
.,. When a market or internal equity adjustment is granted to one class in a series, the other
classes in the series are also adjusted accordingly to maintain internal equity.
'r Internal relationships were considered utilizing these factors and practices.
Consequently, not all currently existing District management classes were market
surveyed as we can make certain inferences between classes that have an internal
relationship. Seventeen (17) of the District's nineteen (19) management classifications
were surveyed.
STUDY PROCESS
I Benchmarking Classifications
The study included nineteen (19) management classifications, and of the 19 classifications we
selected seventeen (17) classifications to externally review (with the intent of internally aligning
the remaining two (2) classifications using internal equity principals). They are:
y Accounting Manager
y Assistant General Manager/Engineer
y Chief Financial Officer
y Executive Services Manager
y General Manager
y Human Resources Director
'y Hydro-Geologist
y Information Systems Manager
'y Laboratory Director
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total C'ompcIlsatioIl Study
Page 3 of II
y Customer Service Manager
y District Information Officer
y Engineering Department Manager
y Land Application Manager
y Manager of Field Operations
y Manager of Plant Operations
y Purchasing Agent
y Senior Engineer
When we contact the comparator agencies to identify possible matches for each of the
benchmarked classifications, there is an assumption that we will not be able to find comparators
that are 100% equivalent to the classifications at STPUD. Therefore, we do not just go by job
titles, which can often be misleading, but we analyzc each class description before we consider it
as a comparator. Our methodology is to analyze each class description according to the factors
listed on Pages I and 2 of this report and we require that a position's "likeness" be at
approximately 70% of the matched position to be included.
11 should be noted that there are three (3) classes that are unique to the District and could not be
found at most comparator agencies. The Executive Services Manager, Hydro-Geologist, and
Land Application Manager are classifications that are unique to the District, which made it
diHicult to find appropriate matches in other agencies. We assigned matches using the 70%
likeness criteria referred to above as best we could.
When we do not lind an appropriate match with one class, we often use "brackets" which can be
functional or represent a span in scope of responsibility. A functional bracket means that the job
of one classification at STPUD is performed by two classifications at a comparator agency. A
"bracket" representing a span in scope means that the comparator agency has one class that is
"bigger" in scope and responsibility and one position that is "smaller," where STPUD's class
falls in the middle.
In all, of the seventeen (17) benchmarked classifications identified, we were able to collect
sutIicient data from the comparator agencies on fourteen (14) classifications. The three (3)
classifications mentioned above for which we did not find enough matches were internally
aligned with other classifications.
Qle~~h~arking Comparator Agencies
I
The second, most important step in conducting a market salary study is the determination of
appropriate agencies for comparison.
In considering the selection of valid agencIes for salary comparator purposes, a number of
factors were taken into consideration:
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 4 of 11
1. Organizational type and structure - We generally recommend that agencies of a similar
size that provide similar services to that of STPUD be used as comparators. However, one
cannot ignore that some of the smaller water and wastewater districts surrounding the District
are competing with the District over the labor pool within the geographic vicinity. Therefore,
we recommended using some smaller agencies as comparators.
Due to STPUD's unique geographic location and high cost of living, we expanded the scope
of the compensation survey to include several agencies from different but similar geographic
regions to get a better mix of comparator agencies that may be facing a similar challenge of
compensating their workforce in a high cost of living area. We also included one City in the
study even though cities are much larger, have a different organizational set-up and structure,
and provide many more services than a public utilities district.
When it comes to the more technical types of classes, such as maintenance workers and plant
operators, or administrative and accounting classes, the size of an organization is not as
critical as these classes perform fairly similar work due to its technical nature.
The difference in size of organization becomes more important when comparing classes at
the management level. The scope of work and responsibility for management becomes much
larger as an organization grows. Factors such as management of a large staff, consequence
of error, the political nature of the job, and its visibility within the community all grow with
larger organizations. For example, it may not be appropriate to compare a Field
Superintendent with a staff of just a few employees at a small district with a Public Works
Superintendent at a large agency in charge of a large department with a staff of fifty and with
several supervisors reporting to that position. In this case, we often look to the next lower
classification as a compromise.
2. Similarity of population, District staff, and operational and capital improvement
budgets - These elements provide guidelines in relation to resources required (staff and
funding) and available for the provision of District services. Again, some similar agencies
from different geographic regions and one City were recommended as comparators, even
though they may serve larger populations and have larger budgets.
3. Scope of services provided - Agencies providing the same services are ideal for
comparators and most comparator agencies surveyed provide similar services to the District,
i.e., water and wastewater related services.
When it comes to management and executive classifications, the types of services provided
by a District become less important, as each agency still needs administrative, financial, and
in most cases engineering, operations and maintenance, and program-related leadership
classifications. At the management level, differences in size and scope of services are more
critical when considering comparators, as explained above.
4. Labor market - In the reality that is today's labor market, many agencies are in competition
for the same pool of qualified employees. No longer do individuals necessarily live in the
South Tahoe Public I]tility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 5 of II
communities they serve. As mentioned above, the geographic labor market area, therefore,
where STPUD may be recruiting from or losing employees to, was taken into consideration
when selecting potential comparator organizations.
5. Compensation Ilhilosophy - Does the District regularly conduct a market survey, and, once
completed, how is this information applied? Many agencies pay to the average or median,
others may pay to a higher percentile. In addition, salary ranges may be set strictly upon
market base salary values or may include the total value of salary and benefits when
developing a compensation policy.
All of the above elements were considered in selecting the group of comparator agencies, The
District agreed on a list of comparator agencies and the following fourteen (14) agencies were
used as comparators for the purposes of this market study:
,.. Amador County Water Agency
);- City of Roseville
);- Cucamonga Valley Water District
);- Delta Diablo Sanitation District
);- Dublin San Ramon Services District
);- EI Dorado Irrigation District
'r Elsinore Valley Water District
,.. Helix Water District
).- North Tahoe Public Utility District
).- Placer County Water Agency
);- Santa Margarita Water District
).- Tahoe- Truckee Sanitation Agency
).- Tahoe City Public Utility District
).- Union Sanitary District
Due to timing and staffing concems, Placer County Water Agency was unable to participate in
the compensation study conducted last year for Local 39 classifications. Since Placer County
Water Agency was not included in the study for Local 39, we did not include the agency in the
current study for the management classifications. Therefore, of the original fourteen (14)
comparator agencies chosen, only thirteen (13) were included in the study.
~chmarking Benefit Data Collection
The last clement requiring discussion prior to beginning a market survey is the specific benefit
data that will be collected and analyzed. The following information was collected for each of the
benchmarked classifications:
1. Monthly Base Salary - The top of the salary range. This was also factored into the total
compensation costs. All figures are presented on a monthly basis.
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 6 of 11
(
2. Employee Retirement - This includes several figures, 1) the amount of the employee's State
retirement (PERS) contribution that is contributed by the District, 2) the amount of the
District's Social Security contribution, and 3) any alternative retirement plan, either private
or public where the employee's contribution is made by the District on behalf of the
employee.
In addition to the amount of the employer paid member contribution of PERS, we collected
information on enhanced PERS benefits. With the help of contract experts at CalPERS, we
were able to determine an average value that agencies have to pay for each of the recently
implemented contract provisions, including formulas such as 2.5% at age 55, 2.7% at 55, and
3% at 60, as well as enhanced benefits such as one-year final compensation (12 highest paid
consecutive months) and employer paid member contributions' converted to pay rate during
the final compensation period (last-year spiking).
3. Insurance - This is the maximum amount paid by the District for employees and dependents
for a cafeteria or flexible benefit plan and/or health, dental, vision, life, long-term and short-
term disability, and employee assistance insurance.
4. Leave - Other than sick leave, which is usage-based, the number of days oil for which the
District is obligated. (These benefits were not converted into dollar amounts and are not
included in total compensation amounts).
).- Vacation - The number of vacation days available to all employees after five years of
employment.
).- Holidays - The number of holidays (including floating) available to employees on an
annual basis.
).- Administrative/Personal Leave - Administrative leave is nonnally the number of
days available to management to reward for extraordinary effort (in lieu of overtime).
Personal leave may be available to other groups of employees to augment vacation or
other time off.
5. Automobile - This category includes either the provision of an auto allowance or the
provision of an auto for personal use. If a car is provided to any classification for commuting
and other personal use, the average monthly rate is estimated at $450.
6. Deferred Compensation - We captured deferred compensation provided to all members of a
classification with or without the requirement for an employee to provide a matching or
minimum contribution.
7. Other - This category includes any additional benefits available to all in the class.
Please note that all of the above benefit elements are negotiated benefits provided to all members
of each comparator class. As such, they represent an on-going cost for which the District must
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 7 of ] I
budget. Other benefit costs, such as sick leave, tuition reimbursement, and reimbursable mileage
are usage-based and cannot be quantified on an individual employee basis.
In addition to the above list of benefits, the District was also interested in gathering information
on the following:
y Retiree Medical Benefit Cost: the maximum amount paid by the Agency for retiree
medical benefit premiums.
Y Longevity: any programs that provide all classifications with salary increases or lump-
sum bonuses after a certain amount of years of services (usually 10, 15, 20, and/or 25
years).
y Sick Leave Cash-out Policy: the specific cash-out policy for accrued sick leave when an
employee retires from the Agency.
y Certification Pay: any amount the Agency is willing to pay for those employees who
obtain approved professional certifications.
Y Policy on Taking District Vehicles Home and/or to Commute: the Agency's policy on
using District vehicles for personal use to take home and/or to commute to work.
,. Policy on Compensatory Time Off: the Agency's policy on compensatory time off.
Appendix V contains the data we collected regarding the details of the above benefits.
I Data Collection
Data was mostly collected in July and August 2008 tlu-ough websites, planned telephone
conversations with human resources, accounting, and/or finance personnel at each comparator
agency, and careful review of agency documentation of classification descriptions, memoranda
of understanding, organization charts, and other documents.
We believe that the salary data collection step is the most critical for maintaining the overall
credibility of any study. We rely very heavily on the STPUD classification descriptions, as they
are the foundation for our comparison. Personnel staff of the comparator agencies were
interviewed by telephone, whenever possible, to understand their organizational structure and
possible classification matches.
All salary survey and benefit information can be found in Appendix II. For each surveyed class,
there are three information pages:
r Market Base (Top Step) Salary Summary Data
,,. Benefit Detail (Monthly Equivalent Values)
,'y Monthly Total Compensation Cost Summary Data
Our analysis includes the average and median (midpoint) comparator data for each benchmarked
classification (assuming we were able to identify at least four matches). In addition, our firm
usually recommends reviewing the median, rather than the average, when evaluating the data.
The median is the exact midpoint of all the market data we collected, with 50% of market data
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 8 oflI
below and 50% of market data above. We recommend using the median methodology because it
is not skewed by extremely high or low salary values (as is the average).
MARKET COMPENSATION FINDINGS
As mentioned above, all of the salary, benefits, and total compensation data for classifications
can be found in Appendix II of this report. The market base and total compensation salary
findings for each class surveyed are listed below, using median base and median total
compensation, arranged in descending order from the most positive percentile (above market) to
the most negative (below market). The percentile represents the difference between the
District's current base salary/total comp for each classification and the median base salary/total
comp of the comparator agencies.
~_2.": ~" :: : ,<:, :0' ;' ::Ji;;J~ ~"'-'. <':,{: :;vf" ,':, : ": ct ,:: "1~~~~" .~~;i~(',~\ ;~, ~:< i',:, \" ,,~,' j.' ' I
~: ~',.\~)_I:' \','~~"[..J~ ~~ ;r~'~
\'. \L9'~')"'~'i1'J!J ' -ii, ,.'",. . .' .' ,;;,&[1" .\j~'~ii~ ", ,. 1; . ' "I" " f!~ tq ~ ~ >r ~'\rr'~! "
;: t t:~;.; .l:~ r;.. . ',', '~,;;~;t:.~ ';:: ' " ": .' '. :~~;~' .',., ' ,', " ':,' it; i;~f~(' ~i-;'<.~ t '1' ,t
Manager of Field Operations 11.0% 7.6%
District Information Officer 10.0% 6.5%
Manager of Plant Operations 0.8% -1.0%
Senior Engineer -1.4% -1.5%
Assistant General Manager/Engineer -3.4% -1. 9%
Purchasing Agent -5.0% -1.5%
Human Resources Director -5.2% -4.5%
Accounting Manager -6.0% -3.3%
Customer Service Manager -6.1% -3.1%
Information Systems Manager -6.5% -7.4%
General Manager -6.8% -8.2%
Engineering Department Manager -8.8% -8.2%
Chief Financial Officer -10.4% -12.4%
Laboratory Director -11.0% -7.0%
Executive Services Manager Insufficient Data Insufficient Data
Hydro-Geologist Insufficient Data Insufficient Data
Land Application Manager Insufficient Data Insufficient Data
Market base salm)' results show that out of seventeen (17) benchmarked classifications, two (2)
classifications are paid above the market median by 10% or more and one (I) classification is
paid above market median by less than 5%. Of the ] 7 benchmarked classifications, eleven (11)
are paid below the market. Two (2) classifications are paid below the market by less than 5%,
seven (7) classes are paid below the market by 5% or more and less than 10%, and two (2)
classifications are paid below the market by more than 10%.
South Tahoc Public Utility District
Total Compcnsation Study
Page l) of II
As mentioned earlier in this report, we consider a classification falling within 5% of the median
to be competitive in the labor market for salary survey purposes because of the differences in
compensation policy and actual scope of work and position requirements. However, a closer
standard can be adopted by an agency. There was an insufficient amount of matches to conduct
statistical analyses for three (3) classifications.
Market total compensation results that out of seventeen (17) benchmarked classifications, two
(2) classifications are paid above market median by more than 5% and less than] 0%. Of the 17
benchmarked classifications, twelve (12) are paid below the market. Seven (7) classifications
are paid below the market by less than 5%, four (4) classes are paid below the market by 5% or
more and less than 10%, and one (1) classification is paid below the market by more than] 0%.
Overall, these differences bctween market base salary and total compensation indicate that the
District's benefit package, in terms of cost, comparable to the market. Further analysis indicates
that, on average, the District's classifications are 3.5% below the market median for base
salaries, while that numbcr changes to 3.4% below market when we look at total compensation.
Since the benefits package is comparable to the market, we will base our recommendations on
base salaries.
INTERNAL SALARY RELA TIONSHIl>S
Although salary information was collected on most of the proposed survey classcs, we could not
make a sound statistical analysis for three (3) of the benchmarked classifications due to lack of
data. In addition, there were two (2) classifications that were not benchmarked. For all
classifications that weren't benchmarked or where we did not find enough comparators, internal
alignments with other classifications will need to be considered, either in the same class series or
those classifications that have similar scope of work and level of responsibility. These internal
relationships need to be analyzcd carefully, using the factors described on Pages I and 2 of this
report. Where it is difficult to ascertain internal relationships due to unique qualifications and
responsibilities, reliance can be placed on past internal relationships. It is important for STPUD
management to carefully review these internal relationships and determine if they are still
appropriate given the current market data.
For example, the compensation study showed that the Manager ofField Operations and Manager
of Plant Operations are paid at varying compensation levels in the market, according to the
market comparators we identified for each class. To a certain degree, this may be a result of the
number of matches found for each of the classes, as well as how/at which level other agencies
assess the "worth" of such classes to the organization. Due to historical relationships at STPUD
and the similarity in scope of work and level of responsibility to the District, we recommend
aligning the Manager of Field Operations and Manager of Plant Operations, even though the
Manager of Field Operations resulted in a lower market median.
Another example of internal alignment is the Engineering Department Manager. Salary range
placement based on the market data we collected would have resulted in a 17.5% differential
with the Principal Engineer and a 10% differential with the Assistant General Manager/Engineer.
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 10 of II
,.--- ,
1 i
I '
Due to the fact that all of the market comparators for the Engineering Department Manager
require registration as Professional Engineer and upon further analysis of scope of work, level of
responsibility, and historical internal relationships, we felt that the alignment between these three
classifications should be adjusted. The internal alignment resulted in a 12.5% differential with
the Principal Engineer and a 15% differential with the Assistant General Manager/Engineer.
STPUD may want to make other internal equity adjustments as it implements a compensation
strategy. This market survey is only a tool to be used by STPUD to determine market indexing
and salary determination. Detailed information regarding each class' current salary and the
percentage difference to the market median is found in Appendix I of this report.
RECOMMENDATIONS
While STPUD may be interested in bringing all salaries to the market base salary median, in
some cases this goal may not be reached with a single adjustment. Normally, if funds are limited
and the compensation implementation program must be carried over months or years, the classes
that are farthest from the market median should receive the greatest equity increase (separate
from any cost ofliving increase). If a class falls within five percent (5%) of the market median,
it would be logical to make no equity adjustment in the first round of changes, whereas if a class
is more than 5% below the market median, a higher percentage change may be initially
warranted to begin minimizing the disparity.
The following are tools we recommend for STPUD's compensation policies, based upon our
experience and the findings outlined in the Appendices.
).- Establish internal relationships and one consistent salary schedule. Currently
STPUD has a 'step' program with six (6) steps, which are each 5% apart from the next.
However, the District does not have established ranges. We are recommending that the
District review the current internal relationships between organizational levels and move
to a more standard structure as outlined on Page 2 of this report.
In addition, we are recommending that the District move to a detailed salary schedule that
has 40 salary ranges, each range 2.5% apart from the next higher range, and each range
having 6 steps which are 5% apart from the next (i.e., about 28% difference between step
1 and step 6). A detailed salary schedule allows for ease of administration and an
enhanced capability to analyze internal relationships. Appendix 1lI contains the
recommended salary schedule.
).- Develop recommendations for salary ranges that are financially sound and place
classes closest to the market median. Appendix IV lists comparisons between each
class' current salary and a recommendation of where the salary should be according to
the market median. We made the following calculation: we used the market base salary
median findings for each surveyed classification and placed them into the proposed
monthly salary schedule, in the salary range closest to the market median number.
South Tahoe Puhlic Utility District
Total Compensation Study
Page 11 of 11
ADDITIONAL BENEFITS INFORMATION
The District also asked us to collect additional information from comparator agencies regarding
retiree medical benefit cost, longevity program, sick leave cash-out policy, certification pay,
policies on taking District vehicles home and/or to commute, and policy on compensatory time-
off.
Results of our finding can be found in Appendix V of this report.
We wish to reiterate our recommendation that this report and our findings are meant to be a tool
for the District to create and implement an equitable compensation plan. Compensation
strategies are designed to attract and retain excellent staff. However, financial realities and
District expectations may also come into play when detennining appropriate compensation
philosophies and strategies. The collected data represents a market survey that will give the
District an instrument to make future compensation decisions.
It has been a pleasure working with STPUD on this critical project. Please do not hesitate to
contact us if we can provide any additional information or clarification regarding this report.
Respectfully Submitted,
Koff & Associates, Inc.
~S.l0l~
Georg S. Krammer
Chief Executive Otlicer
Apps .Aix I
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Side -By -Side Results Summary
September 2008
Classification
STPUD
Current
Monthly Salary
Top Monthly Salary Data
Average
% above
or below
Median
STPUD Total
or below Monthly
Compensation
% above
Total Monthly Compensation Data
Average
% above Median
or below
% above
or below
Accounting Manager
Assistant General Manager /Engineer
Chief Financial Officer
Customer Service Manager
District Information Officer
Engineering Department Manager
Executive Services Manager
General Manager
Human Resources Director
Hydro - Geologist
Information Systems Manager
Laboratory Director
Land Application Manager
Manager of Field Operations
Manager of Plant Operations
Purchasing Agent
Senior Engineer
$8,091
$13,244
$11,323
$8,091
$8,491
$11,491
$8,091
$14,767
$9,407
$9,186
$8,758
$8,141
$9,186
$10,658
$10,339
$7,683
$9,186
$8,541
$13,920
$12,277
$8,470
$7,761
$12,527
Insufficient data
$15,692 -6.3%
$9,926 -5.5%
Insufficient data
$9,636 -10.0%
$8,880 -9.1%
$9,996
$10,560
$8,054
$9,377
- 5.6%
- 5.1%
- 8.4%
- 4.7%
8.6%
-9.0%
6.2%
- 2.1%
-4.8%
-2.1%
$8,573
$13,689
$12,504
$8,588
$7,642
$12,500
to do analysis
$15,770 -6.8%
$9,896 -5.2%
to do analysis
$9,324 -6.5%
$9,036 -11.0%
Insufficient data to do analysis
$9,490
$10,256
$8,065
$9,311
-6.0%
- 3.4%
-10.4%
- 6.1%
10.0%
-8.8%
11.0%
0.8%
-5.0%
-1.4%
$11,070
$17,231
$14,661
$11,095
$11,536
$14,847
$11,070
$18,912
$12,547
$12,303
$11,831
$11,128
$12,363
$13,988
$13,636
$10,594
$12,303
$11,582
$18,321
$16,174
$11,447
$10,856
$16,506
Insufficient data to do analysis
$20,417 -8.0% $20,467 -8.2%
$13,282 -5.9% $13,114 -4.5%
Insufficient data to do analysis
$12,858 -8.7% $12,707 -7.4%
$11,971 -7.6% $11,906 -7.0%
Insufficient data to do analysis
$13,457
$14,334
$10,948
$12,599
-4.6%
- 6.3%
-10.3%
- 3.2%
5.9%
-11.2%
3.8%
- 5.1%
-3.3%
-2.4%
$11,432
$17,560
$16,483
$11,437
$10,785
$16,061
$12,924
$13,766
$10,873
$12,489
-3.3%
-1.9%
-12.4%
-3.1%
6.5%
- 8.2%
7.6%
- 1.0%
-2.6%
-1.5%
Page 1 of 1
AVG: -4.1% AVG: -3.5%
AVG: -4.8% AVG: -3.4%
Sorted: Alphabetical
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 1a of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
ACCOUNTING MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Helix Water District
2 El Dorado Irrigation District
3 City of Roseville
4 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
5 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
6 Santa Margarita Water Agency
7 Union Sanitary District
8 South Tahoe Public Utility District
9 Cucamonga Valley Water District
10 Tahoe City Public Utility District
11 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Finance Manager
Accounting Manager
Accounting Manager
Accounting Manager
Finance Supervisor
Senior Financial Analyst
Principal Financial Analyst
Accounting Manager
Accounting Officer
Senior Accountant
Accounting Supervisor
N/C
N/C
N/C
$9,330
$9,213
$9,001
$8,843
$8,607
$8.540
$8,343
$8,091
$8,074
$7,756
$7,706
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/5/2008
1/1/2008
7/13/2008
7/1/2008
9/1/2007
1/10/2008
12/17/2007
1/1/2008
12/31/2007
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
1/3/2009
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
9/1/2008
10/1/2008
1/1/2009
12/29/2008
Unknown
1-4%
4%
2.5 -6%
2 -5%
Unknown
Unknown
3%
Unknown
2 -6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$8,541
-5.6%
$8,573
-6.0%
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
ACCOUNTING MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Accounting
Manager
$8,091
$199
$546
$502
$1,600
$21
$18
$92
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,979
$11,070
Page 1 b of 34
Amador Co
Water Agency
N/C
N/C
N/C
City of Roseville
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District North Tahoe PUD
Accounting Accounting Finance Accounting Accounting Accounting Finance
Manager Officer Supervisor Supervisor Manager Manager Manager
$9,001
$720
$608
$58
$108
$8,074 $8,607
$646 $689 $369 $619 $746
$545 $581 $596 $622 $597 $355
$97
$7.706 $9,213
$3,388 $2,549 $3,473 $3,342
$12,390 $10,623 $12,080 $11,048
$106 $111 $106 $112
$527 $527 $527 $527
$1,118 $1,029 $1.386 $1,244 $1,224 $1,164 $1,253
$148 $161 $186 $178 $97 $116 $66
$20 $15 $30 $31 $21 $17
$32 $5 $13 $10 $6 $35 $33
$34 $23 $58 $42 $9
$23
$2 $5 $5 $6 $4 $3 $3
14 days 15 days 16 days 25 days 15 days 10 days 29 days 4
12 days 13 days 14 days 8 days 12 days 13 days 12 days
12.5 days 2 days 5 days 5 days
$540 $646
$42
$2,958
$12,171
$8,843 $9,330
$2,704 $3,162
$11,547 $12,492
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self - insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
3- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
4- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
N/C
N/C
N/C
ACCOUNTING ING MANAGER
Agency
South Tahoe
Public Utility
' District
Santa Margarita
Water Agency
9 Y
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
9 Y
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Hearth
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation '
Other
Benefit Cost
Accounting
Manager
$8,091
$199
$546
$502
$1,600
$21
$18
$92
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,979
Senior Financial
Analyst
$8,540
$683
$576
$55
$102
$902
$41
$17
$56
$91
$102
$3
24 days 3
10.5 days
$145
$2,776
N/C
N/C
Senior
Accountant
$7,756
$621
$524
$50
$93
$481
$1,254
$95
$18
$14
$56
$20
27 days
11 days
$155
$3,380
Principal
Financial Analyst
$8,343
$501
$317
$30
$100
$1,367
$19
$41
$4
15 days
13 days
5 days
$292
$2,670
Total Monthiy Compensation ii
$11,070 II
$11,316
N/C
$11,137
$11,013
Page 2b of 34
South Tahoe PuBi7'c Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08 xls
ACCOUNTING MANAGER
Total
Next
Next
Monthly
Effective
Salary
Percentage
Rank
Comparator Agency
Class Title
Comp
Date
Increase
Increase
1
Helix Water District
Finance Manager
$12,492
7/1/2008
7/1/2009
Unknown
2
City of Roseville
Accounting Manager
$12,390
1/5/2008
1/3/2009
4%
3
El Dorado Irrigation District
Accounting Manager
$12,171
1/1/2008
1/1/2009
1-4%
4
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
Finance Supervisor
$12,080
7/13/2008
7/1/2009
2 -5%
5
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Accounting Manager
$11,547
1/1/2008
1/1/2009
2.5 -6%
6
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Senior Financial Analyst
$11,316
7/1/2008
7/1/2009
Unknown
7
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Senior Accountant
$11,137
1/1/2008
1/1/2009
Unknown
8
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Accounting Manager
$11,070
1/10/2008
9
Dublin San Ramon Services District
Accounting Supervisor
$11,048
12/31/2007
12/29/2008
2 -6%
10
Union Sanitary District
Principal Financial Analyst
$11,013
9/1/2007
9/1/2008
Unknown
11
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Accounting Officer
$10,623
12/17/2007
10/1/2008
3%
Amador County Water Agency
N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District
N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
N/C
Average of Comparators
$11,582
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
-4.6%
Median of Comparators
$11,432
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
-3.3%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
South Tahoe Pubic Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
N/C - Non Comparator
Page lc of 17
9 -10-08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires Registration as a Professional Civil Engineer.
2- Registration as a Civil Engineer is not required.
3- Position currently vacant. TCPUD has an Administrator of Planning and Public Works classification, but this position does not serve as AGM.
Page 2a of 17
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt xis
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER/ENGINEER
Top
Next
Next
Rank
Comparator
Monthly
Effective
Salary
Percentage
Agency
Class Title
Salary
Date
Increase
Increase
1
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
Deputy General Manager 2
$16,150
7/13/2008
7/1/2009
2 -5%
2
Elsinore Valley Water District
Assistant General Manager
$15,224
1/1/2008
1/1/2009
2.5 -6%
3
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Assistant General Manager 2
$14,146
12/17/2007
10/1/2008
3%
4
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Assistant General Manager /Engineer I
$13,244
1/10/2008
5
Dublin San Ramon Services District a
District Engineer /Assistant General Manager'
$13,233
12/31/2007
12/29/2008
2 -6%
6
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Assistant General Manager 2'3
$12,470
1/1/2008
1/1/2009
Unknown
7
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Amador County Water District
Chief Engineer /Assistant General Manager'
N/C
$12,296
7/1/2008
7/1/2009
Unknown
City of Roseville
N/C
El Dorado Irrigation District
N/C
Helix Water District
N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District
N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency
N/C
Union Sanitary District
N/C
Average of Comparators
$13,920
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
-5.1%
Median of Comparators
$13,689
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
-3.4%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires Registration as a Professional Civil Engineer.
2- Registration as a Civil Engineer is not required.
3- Position currently vacant. TCPUD has an Administrator of Planning and Public Works classification, but this position does not serve as AGM.
Page 2a of 17
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt xis
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER/ENGINEER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Assistant General
Manager /Engineer
$13,244
$325
$894
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$151
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$450
$3,987
$17,231
Page 3b of 34
Amador Co
Water Agency
City of Roseville
South Tahoe Pubrrc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District North Tahoe PUD
N/C N/C Assistant Deputy Dist Engineer/ N/C Assistant N/C N/C
General Manager General Manager Assistant GM General Manager
$14,146 $16,150
$1,132
$1,292 $1,066
$955 $1,090 $992 $1,028
$170
$969 91,386 $1,244 $1,164
$151 $186 $178 $116
$14 $30 $31 $21
$5 S33 $10 $60
$41 $108
$41
$73
$5 $5 $6 $3
15 days
13 days
5 days
$450
$13,233 $15,224
$176 $183
$527 $527
16 days
14 days
5 days
$500
30 days
13 days
$969 $646
10 days
13 days
5 days
N/C N/C $3,932 $6,125 $3,809 N/C $3,714 N/C N/C
N/C N/C $18,078 $22,275 $17,041 N/C $18,937 N/C N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER/ENGINEER
Agency
South Tahoe
Public Utility
' District
Santa Margarita
Water Agency
9 Y
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
9 Y
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Assistant General
Manager /Engineer
$13,244
$325
$894
$527
$1,600
$21
$
$151
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$450
$3,987
N/C
N/C
Chief Engineer/
Assistant GM
$12,296
$984
$830
$2,001
$142
$21
$65
30 days
11 days
$450
$4,493
Assistant
General Manager
$12,470
$998
$842
$80
$150
$527
$1,254
$95
$18
$14
$90
$20
27 days
11 days
$249
$4,337
N/C
N/C
Total Monthly Compensation
$17,231
N/C
$16,789
$16,807
N/C
Page 4b of 34
South Tahoe PutTh - t Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Pub= Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER/ENGINEER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
2 Elsinore Valley Water District
3 Cucamonga Valley Water District
4 South Tahoe Public Utility District
5 Dublin San Ramon Services District
6 Tahoe City Public Utility District
7 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Amador County Water District
City of Roseville
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Union Sanitary District
Deputy General Manager
Assistant General Manager
Assistant General Manager
Assistant General Manager /Engineer
District Engineer /Assistant General Manager
Assistant General Manager
Chief Engineer /Assistant General Manager
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$22,275
$18,937
$18,078
$17,231
$17,041
$16,807
$16,789
7/13/2008
1/1/2008
12/17/2007
1/10/2008
12/31/2007
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
7/1/2009 2 -5%
1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
10/1/2008
12/29/2008
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
3%
2 -6%
Unknown
Unknown
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$18,321
-6.3%
$17,560
-1.9%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 2c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
2 Santa Margarita Water Agency
3 Union Sanitary District
4 Cucamonga Valley Water District
5 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
6 Helix Water District
7 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
8 El Dorado Irrigation District
9 South Tahoe Public Utility District
10 Tahoe City Public Utility District
11 City of Roseville
12 North Tahoe Public Utility District
Amador County Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Business Services Director
Director of Finance
Business Services Manager
Director of Financial & Administrative Services
Financial Services Manager /Finance Officer
Director of Administrative Services
Director of Finance
Director of Finance and Management Services
Chief Financial Officer
Director of Accounting and Employee Services
Assistant Finance Director
Chief Financial Officer
N/C
N/C
$14,341
$13,921
$13,565
$13,558
$12,717
$12,504
$12,496
$11,686
$11,323
$11,057
$10,420
$8,786
7/13/2008
7/1/2008
9/1/2007
12/17/2007
12/31/2007
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/10/2008
1/1/2008
1/5/2008
7/1/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
9/1/2008
10/1/2008
12/29/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
1/1/2009
1/1/2009
1/3/2009
7/1/2009
2 -5%
Unknown
Unknown
3%
2 -6%
Unknown
2.5 -6%
1-4%
Unknown
4%
2 -6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$12,277
-8.4%
$12,504
-10.4%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
Page 3a of 17
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other 2
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Chief Financial
Officer
$11,323
$278
$764
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$129
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,338
$14,661
Page 5b of 34
Amador Co
Water Agency
N/C
N/C
N/C
South Tahoe PUBT c Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
Assistant
Finance Director
$10,420
$834
$703
$67
$125
$1,118
$148
$20
$38
$40
$2
14 days
12 days
12.5 days
$625
Cucamonga
Valley WD
Director of Fin
& Admin Svcs
$13,558
$1,085 $1,147
$915 $968
$163
$969
$151
$14
$5
$39
$39
$5
15 days
13 days
3 days
Delta Diablo
Sanitation Dist
Business Financial Svcs Mgr/
Services Director Finance Officer
$14,341 $12,717
$527
$1,386
$186
$30
$33
$96
$5
16 days
14 days
5 days
$500
$860
$3,719 $3,384 $5,738
$14,139 $16,942 $20,078
Dublin San Ramon
Srvs Dist
$955
$170
$527
$1,244
$178
$31
$10
30 days
13 days
$646
El Dorado Irrigation Elsinore Valley
Dist Water District Helix Water District
Director of Finance
& Mgmt Services
$11.686
$467
$789
$140
$527
$1,224
$97
$6
$6 $4
15 days
12 days
10 days
$400
$3,765 $3,654
$16,483 $15,340
Director
of Finance
$12,496
$875
$843
$150
$1,164
$116
$21
$49
$60
$3
10 days
13 days
5 days
$400
$3,682
$16,177
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self- insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
2- North Tahoe Public Utility District offers a Health Reimbursement Arrangement. The District provides each EE with $1,500 annually to cover any medical
expenses not covered by the health plans.
3- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
4- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
Director of
Admin Services
$12,504
$1,000
$475
$150
$527
$1,253
$66
$17
$44
$13
$3
29 days 3
12 days
$500
$42
$4,089
$16,593
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 6b of 34
South Tahoe PutTic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other 2
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe II North Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita Tahoe- Truckee Union Sanitary
Public Utility District Water Agency Sanitation Agency Tahoe City PUD
District
Chief Financial
Officer
$11,323
$278
$764
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$129
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,338
Chief Financial Director N/C Dir of Acctg Business
Officer of Finance & Employee Svcs Services Mgr
$8,786 $13,921 $11,057 $13,565
$1,114 $885 $814
$940 $746 $515
$89 $71 $49
$167 $133 $163
$527 $527
$1,076
$1,188
$902 $1,367
$1,254
$41 $95
$17 $18
$74 $56 $14 $5
$105 $149 $80 $32
$167
$ $20 $4
$125
15 days
12 days
5 days
$329
$3,423
24 days
10 5 days
$145
27 days 15 days
11 days 13 days
5 days
$310
$221 $292
$3,791 N/C $4,064 $3,550
$14,661 II $12,208
$17,711 N/C $15,121 $17,115
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
2 Santa Margarita Water Agency
3 Union Sanitary District
4 Cucamonga Valley Water District
5 Helix Water District
6 Dublin San Ramon Services District
7 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
8 El Dorado Irrigation District
9 Tahoe City Public Utility District
10 South Tahoe Public Utility District
11 City of Roseville
12 North Tahoe Public Utility District
Amador County Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Business Services Director
Director of Finance
Business Services Manager
Director of Financial & Administrative Services
Director of Administrative Services
Financial Services Manager /Finance Officer
Director of Finance
Director of Finance and Management Services
Director of Accounting and Employee Services
Chief Financial Officer
Assistant Finance Director
Chief Financial Officer
N/C
N/C
$20,078
$17,711
$17,115
$16,942
$16,593
$16,483
$16,177
$15,340
$15,121
$14,661
$14,139
$12,208
7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
9/1/2007 9/1/2008 Unknown
12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
1/1/2008 1 /1 /2009 1-4%
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 Unknown
1/10/2008
1/5/2008 1/3/2009 4%
7/1/2008 7/1/2009 2 -6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$16,174
- 10.3%
$16,483
-12.4%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 3c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 El Dorado Irrigation District Customer & Development Services Manager ° $9,213 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1-4%
2 Helix Water District Customer Service Manager 5 $8,886 7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
3 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Customer Service Manager 6 $8.843 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
4 Cucamonga Valley Water District Customer Service Officer 2 $8,332 12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
5 City of Roseville Customer Service Representative Manager / Utilities Accounts Manager $8,139 1/5/2008 1/3/2009 4%
6 South Tahoe Public Utility District Customer Service Manager $8,091 1/10/2008
7 Dublin San Ramon Services District a Customer Service Supervisor 3 $7,410 12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
Amador County Water Agency N/C
Delta Diablo Sanitation District N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
Union Sanitary District N/C
NOTE. All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$8,470
-4.7%
$8,588
-6.1%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1 -South Tahoe PUD's Class is bracketed by two or more comparators.
2 - Requires a Grade I Water Distribution Certificate.
3- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to an Associate's degree and 5 years of experience, including 3 years at the supervisory level.
4- Requires a Bachelor's degree and 5 years of experience as a manager or in lieu of a Bachelor's degree, requires five years of experience in responsible project, program, and people management positions.
5- Requires training and experience equivalent to graduation from a four -year college or university and 5 years of increasingly responsible experience supervising or managing a customer service function.
6- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 7 years of experience. including 4 years of administrative and supervisory experience.
7- Customer Service Representative Manager requires equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 4 years of management level experience; Utilities Accounts Manager requires any combination of education and
experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 3 years of experience, including 1 year of supervisory or lead experience.
Page 4a of 17
9-5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Page 7b of 34
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Customer Service
Manager
$8,091
$199
$546
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$92
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,004
$11,095
Amador Co
Water Agency
South Tahoe Pubifc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
N/C CSR Manager / Customer Svcs N/C Customer Service Cust & Development Customer Service Customer Service
Utilities Acct Mgr Officer Supervisor Services Manager 9 Manager Manager
N/C
N/C $11,326
$8,139 $8,332
$651
$549
$52
$98
14 days
12 days
12.5 days
$488
$3,187 $2,591
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Irrigation Elsinore Valley
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Dist Water District
$667
$7,410
$562 $369 $619 $711
$575 $622 $597 $338
$100
$102
$527
$1,118 $1,029
$1,244
$148
$161 $178
$20 $15 $31
$29 $5 $10
$31 $24
$24
$2 $5
15 days
13 days
2 days
$10,923
$6 $4 $3 $3
20 days
8 days
$646
$9,213
$111
$527
15 days
12 days
5 days
$8,843 $8,886
$106 $107
$527
$1,224 $1,164 $1,253
$97 $116 $66
$21 $17
$6 $35 $31
$42 $9
10 days
13 days
5 days
N/C $3,317 $2,958
$2,704
N/C $10,727 $12,171
$11,547
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services Districts Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self- insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
3- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
Helix Water
District
29 days 3
12 days
$42
$3,102
$11,988
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 8b of 34
South Tahoe PuC Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER
Agency
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
North Tahoe PUD
Santa Margarita Water
Agency
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
9 Y
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation'
Other
Benefit Cost
Customer Service
Manager
$8,091
$199
$546
$527
$1,600
$Y1
$18
S92
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,004
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N,C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Total Monthly Compensation 11
I
$11,095 II
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Page 8b of 34
South Tahoe PuC Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe PubrIC Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 El Dorado Irrigation District
2 Helix Water District
3 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
4 City of Roseville
5 South Tahoe Public Utility District
6 Cucamonga Valley Water District
7 Dublin San Ramon Services District
Amador County Water Agency
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
Customer & Development Services Manager
Customer Service Manager
Customer Service Manager
Customer Service Representative Manager / Utilities Accounts Manager
Customer Service Manager
Customer Service Officer
Customer Service Supervisor
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$12,171
$11,988
$11,547
$11,326
$11,095
$10,923
$10,727
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/5/2008
1/10/2008
12/17/2007
12/31/2007
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
1/3/2009
1-4%
Unknown
2.5 -6%
4%
10/1/2008 3%
12/29/2008 2 -6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$11,447
- 3.2%
$11,437
-3.1%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 4c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
DISTRICT INFORMATION OFFICER
Top Next Next
Rank Comparator Agency Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Class Title Salary Date Increase Increase
1 South Tahoe Public Utility District District Information Officer
2 City of Roseville $8,491 1/10/2008
Communications Manager $8,404 1/5/2008 1/3/2009 4%
3 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
4 Helix Water District Public Affairs Representative / Director of Legislative & Community Affairs 56 $8,258 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
Public Affairs Manager °
$7,676 7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
5 Cucamonga Valley Water District Public Affairs Officer 2
6 Dublin San Ramon Services District ° Community Affairs Supervisor $7.607 12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
$7,410 12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
7 Delta Diablo Sanitation District Community Outreach Coordinator 2
Amador County Water Agency N/C $7,212 7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
El Dorado Irrigation District N/C 3
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
Union Sanitary District N/C
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$7,761
8.6%
$7,642
10.0%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1 - Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 5 years of experience, including 2 years of supervisory experience.
2 Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 4 years of experience
3 - Community Outreach /Public Supervisor position no longer exists.
4- Requires training and experience equivalent to graduation from a four -year college or university and 7 years of progressively responsible experience.
5 -South Tahoe PUD's Class is bracketed by two or more comparators.
6- Director of Legislative and Community Affairs requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 10 years of experience.
Page 5a of 17
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xis
DISTRICT INFORMATION OFFICER
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
District Information
Officer
$8,491
$208
$573
$526
$1,600
$21
$18
$97
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,045
$11,536
Page 9b of 34
Amador Co
Water Agency
N/C
N/C
N/C
South Tahoe Pub* Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
Communications
Manager
$8,404
$672
$567
$54
$101
$1,118
$148
$20
$30
$32
$2
14 days
12 days
12.5 days
$504
$3,249
$11,653
Cucamonga Delta Diablo
Valley WD Sanitation Dist
Public Affairs Community Outreach
Officer Coordinator
$7,607
$609
$513
$91
$1,029
$161
$15
$5
$22
$22
$5
15 days
13 days
2 days
$2,472
$10,079
$7,212
$577
$487
$447
$1,386
$186
$30
$33
$48
$5
16 days
14 days
5 days
$433
$3,631
$10,843
Dublin San Ramon El Dorado
Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist
Community Affairs
Supervisor
$7,410
$575
$102
$527
$1,244
$178
$31
$10
$6
25 days
8 days
$646
$3,317
$10,727
N/C
N/C
N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
Elsinore Valley
Water District
Pub Affairs Rep/
Dir of Leg & Comm
Affairs
$8.258
$578
$557
$99
$1,164
$116
$21
$33
$40
$3
10 days
13 days
5 days
$400
$3,011
$11,269
Helix Water
District
Public Affairs
Manager
$7,676
$614
$292
$92
$476
$1,253
$66
$17
$27
$8
$3
29 days 2
12 days
$42
$2,888
$10,564
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 10b of 34
South Tahoe PuBTfc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
DISTRICT INFORMATION OFFICER
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
North Tahoe PUD
Santa Margarita
Water A
Agency
9 Y
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
9 Y
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation 1
Other
Benefit Cost
District Information
Officer
$8,491
$208
$573
$526
$1,600
$21
$18
$97
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,045
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Total Monthly Compensation
$11,536
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Page 10b of 34
South Tahoe PuBTfc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 5c of 17
South Tahoe PubTic Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
DISTRICT INFORMATION OFFICER
Total Next Next
Rank Comparator Agency Class Title Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 City of Roseville Communications Manager
2 South Tahoe Public Utility District District Information Officer $11,653 1/3/2009 4%
3 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Public Affairs Representative / Director of Legislative & Community Affairs $11,536 1/ 1/5/2008 10/2008
ty
4 Delta Diablo Sanitation District Community Outreach $11,843 reach Coordinator $10,843 7//13/213/2 08 1/1/2009 008 7/1/2009 2 -2.556%
5%
5 Dublin San Ramon Services District Community Affairs Supervisor $10,727 12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
6 Helix Water District Public Affairs Manager $10,564 7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
7 Cucamonga Valley Water District Public Affairs Officer
Amador County Water Agency N/C $10,079 12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
El Dorado Irrigation District N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
Union Sanitary District N/C
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$10,856
5.9%
$10,785
6.5%
9 -10-08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
Page 6a of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Salary Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Santa Margarita Water Agency
2 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
3 Cucamonga Valley Water District
4 Helix Water District
5 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
6 City of Roseville
7 South Tahoe Public Utility District
8 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
9 Amador County Water Agency
El Dorado Irrigation District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
Chief Engineer 1
District Engineer /Engineering Services Director
Director of Engineering 1
Director of Engineering 1
Director of Engineering'
Engineering Manager'
Engineering Department Manager 2
Principal Engineer - Supervisory
Manager of Engineering and Planning 1
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$14,987
$14,341
$12,702
$12,504
$12,496
$11,773
$11,491
$11,034
$10,381
7/1/2008
7/13/2008
12/17/2007
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/5/2008
1/10/2008
12/31/2007
1/1/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
10/1/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
1/3/2009
Unknown
2 -5%
3%
Unknown
2.5 -6%
4%
12/29/2008 2 -6%
9/1/2009 2 -5%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$12,527
-9.0%
$12,500
-8.8%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires Registration as a Professional Civil Engineer.
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other 2
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Engineering
Dept Manager
$11,491
$282
$776
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$131
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,356
$14,847
Page 11 b of 34
Amador Co Water
Agency
Mgr of Engineering
& Planning
$10,381
$727
$527
$1,177
$101
$22
$34
$52
$7
$3
15 days
12 days
6 days
$333
South Tahoe PubTfc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
Engineering
Manager
$11,773
$942
$795
$75
$141
$1,118
$148
$20
$42
$45
$2
14 days
12 days
12.5 days
$706
$2,983 $4,035 $3,243 $5,738
$13,364 $15,807 $15,945 $20,078
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
Director of District Engineer/ Principal N/C
Engineering Eng Svcs Director Engineer - Supv
$12,702
$1,016
15 days
13 days
3 days
$14,341 $11,034
$1,147
$857. $968 $835
$152 $148
$527
$969 $1,386
$151 $186
$14 $30
$5 $33
$37 $96
$37
$5 $5 $6
16 days
14 days
5 days
$500
$860
$527
$1,244
$178
$31
$10
25 days
8 days
$646
$3,623 N/C
$14,657 N/C
Director of Director of
Engineering Engineering
$12,496 $12,504
$875
$843
$150
$1,164
$116
$21
$49
$60
$3
10 days
13 days
5 days
$400
$3,682
$16,177
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- North Tahoe Public Utility District offers a Health Reimbursement Arrangement. The District provides each EE with $1,500 annually to cover any medical
expenses not covered by the health plans.
3- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
4- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
$1,000
$475
$150
$527
$1,253
$66
$17
$44
$13
$3
29 days 3
12 days
$500
$42
$4,089
$16,593
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 12b of 34
South Tahoe Pu'n'ic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other 2
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation'
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Engineering
Dept Manager
$11,491
$282
$776
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$131
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,356
N/C
N/C
Chief
Engineer
$14,987
$1,199
$1.012
$96
$180
$902
$41
$17
$56
$160
$180
$3
24 days
10.5 days
$450
$145
N/C
N/C N/C
$4,442 N/C N/C N/C
South Tahoe IlNorth Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Public Utility District II Water Agency Sanitation Agency Tahoe City PUD
District
$14,847 N/C $19,429 N/C N/C N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Pub7i"c Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
2 Santa Margarita Water Agency
3 Helix Water District
4 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
5 Cucamonga Valley Water District
6 City of Roseville
7 South Tahoe Public Utility District
8 Dublin San Ramon Services District
9 Amador County Water Agency
El Dorado Irrigation District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
District Engineer /Engineering Services Director
Chief Engineer
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering
Engineering Manager
Engineering Department Manager
Principal Engineer- Supervisory
Manager of Engineering and Planning
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$20,078
$19,429
$16,593
$16,177
$15,945
$15,807
$14,847
$14,657
$13,364
7/13/2008
7/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
12/17/2007
1/5/2008
1/10/2008
12/31/2007
1/1/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
10/1/2008
1/3/2009
2 -5%
Unknown
Unknown
2.5 -6%
3%
4%
12/29/2008 2 -6%
9/1/2009 2 -5%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$16,506
- 11.2%
$16,061
-8.2%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 6c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
Page 7a of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
EXECUTIVE SERVICES MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Salary Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Dublin San Ramon Services District
2 South Tahoe Public Utility District
3 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
4 City of Roseville
Amador County Water Agency
Cucamonga Valley Water District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
Executive Services Supervisor'
Executive Services Manager
Office Manager /Secretary to the Board
Assistant to the City Manager
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$8,249 12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
$8,091 1/10/2008
$7,661 7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
$6,298 1/5/2008 1/3/2009 4%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 5 years of experience.
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
EXECUTIVE SERVICES MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Executive
Services Manager
$8,091
$199
$546
$502
$1,600
$21
$18
$92
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,979
$11,070
Page 13b of 34
Amador Co Cucamonga Valley Delta Diablo Sanitation Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Water Agency City of Roseville
WD Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
N/C
N/C
N/C
South Tahoe PubTic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
Assistant to the N/C Office Manager/ Executive Services
City Manager Secretary to the Board Supervisor
$6,298
$7,661 $8,249
$504 $613
$425 $517 $635
$40
$76
14 days
12 days
$378
$113
$475 $527
$1,118 $1,386
$148 $1,244
$186 $178
$20 $30 $31
$23 $33 $10
$24 $51
$2 $5 $6
16 days
14 days
5 days
25 days
8 days
$460 $646
$2,758 N/C $3,755 $3,388
$9,056 N/C $11,415 $11,637
N/C
N/C
N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
N/C N/C
N/C N/C
N/C N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 14b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
EXECUTIVE SERVICES MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation 1
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Executive
Services Manager
$8,091
$199
$546
$502
$1,600
$21
$18
$92
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,979
$11,070
North Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Water Agency Sanitation Agency Tahoe City PUD
9 Y District
N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08. xis
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
EXECUTIVE SERVICES MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 Dublin San Ramon Services District
2 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
3 South Tahoe Public Utility District
4 City of Roseville
Amador County Water Agency
Cucamonga Valley Water District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
Executive Services Supervisor
Office Manager /Secretary to the Board
Executive Services Manager
Assistant to the City Manager
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$11,637
$11,415
$11,070
$9,056
12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
1/10/2008
1/5/2008 1/3/2009 4%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 7c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 8a of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
GENERAL MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Salary Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Cucamonga Valley Water District
2 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
3 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
4 Santa Margarita Water Agency
5 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
6 Helix Water District
7 Union Sanitary District
8 City of Roseville
9 South Tahoe Public Utility District
10 El Dorado Irrigation District
11 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
12 Tahoe City Public Utility District
13 North Tahoe Public Utility District
14 Amador County Water Agency
General Manager /CEO 2
General Manager 2
General Manager /District Engineer'
General Manager 2
General Manager 2
General Manager 2
General Manager'
Director of Environmental Utilities 1
General Manager 2
General Manager 2
General Manager 2
General Manager 3
General Manager 2
General Manager
$22,665
$18,084
$17,645
$17,250
$16,805
$16,034
$15,770
$15,145
$14,767
$14,246
$13,364
$13,121
$12,500
$11,363
12/17/2007
12/31/2007
7/13/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
9/1/2007
1/5/2008
5/31/2007
5/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
10/1/2008
12/29/2008
8/18/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
9/1/2008
1/3/2009
5/1/2009
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
9/1/2009
3%
2 -6%
2 -5%
Unknown
2.5 -6%
Unknown
Unknown
4%
1-4%
Unknown
Unknown
2-6%
2 -5%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$15,692
-6.3%
$15,770
-6.8%
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires Registration as a Professional Civil Engineer
2- PE Registration is not required.
3- Does not require Registration as a Professional Engineer (desirable).
9 - - APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
GENERAL MANGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General
Manager
$14,767
$362
$997
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$168
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$450
$4,145
$18,912
Page 15b of 34
15 days 14 days
12 days 12 days
6 days 12.5 days
$500 $500
$333 $909
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
Amador Co Cucamonga Valley Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Water Agency City of Roseville
WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
General Director of General Manager/ General Manager/ General General General General
Manager Environmental Utilities CEO District Engineer Manager Manager Manager M nager
$11,363 $15,145 $22,665 $17,645 $18,084 $14.246 $16,805
$16,034
$795 $1,212 $1,813 $1,412 $570 $1,176 $1,283
$1,022 $1,530 $1,191 $1,340
$97 $962 $1,134 $609
$182 $272 $238 $ $202 $192
$527 $527 $527 $527 $527
$1,177 $1,118 $969 $1,386
$1,244
$101 $148
$151 $186 $178
$22 $20 $14 $30 $31
$37 $55 $5 $33 $10
$57 $58 $66 $118
$7 $66
$3 $2 $5 $5 $6
15 days
13 days
5 days
25 days
14 days
5 days
$1,000 $500
$1,059
30 days
13 days
$646
$1,224 $1,164 $1,253
$97 $116 $66
$21 $17
$ $ $56
$81 $16
$4
$3 $3
15 days 10 days 29 days
12 days 13 days 12 days
10 days 5 days
$400 $600 $600
$42
$3,560 $5,322 $5,890 $6,445 $4,218
$3,960 $4,564 $4,664
$14,923 $20,467 $28,554 $24,091 $22,302 $18,205 $21,368 $20,698
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self- insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
2- North Tahoe Public Utility District offers a Health Reimbursement Arrangement. The District provides each EE with $1,500 annually to cover any medical
expenses not covered by the health plans.
3- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
4- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 16b of 34
South Tahoe Pub Tic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
GENERAL MANGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other 2
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
North Tahoe Santa Margarita Water Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Agency Agency Sanitation A Tahoe City PUD
9 Y District
General
Manager
$14,767
$362
$997
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$168
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$450
$4,145
General General General General General
Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager
$12,500 $17.250 $13.364 $13,121 $15,770
$527
$1,531
$1,188
$1,380 $1,069 $1,050 $946
$1,164 $902 $886 $599
$110 $84 $57
$207 $157 $189
$527
$902 $1, 367
$2,001 $1,254
$41 $142 $95
$17 $21 $18
$105 $56 $71 $14 $36
$149 $185 $95 $77
$207
$ $20 $4
$125
15 days
12 days
5 days
$450
$4,074
24 days 4 30 days 27 days 15 days
10 5 days 11 days 11 days 16 days
10 days
$450 $450 $466 $450
$145 $525 $292
$4,869 $4,656 $5,190 $4,017
$18,912 II $16,574
$22,119 $18,020
$18,311 $19,787
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
GENERAL MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Cucamonga Valley Water District
2 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
3 Dublin San Ramon Services District
4 Santa Margarita Water Agency
5 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
6 Helix Water District
7 City of Roseville
8 Union Sanitary District
9 South Tahoe Public Utility District
10 Tahoe City Public Utility District
11 El Dorado Irrigation District
12 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
13 North Tahoe Public Utility District
14 Amador County Water Agency
General Manager /CEO
General Manager /District Engineer
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
Director of Environmental Utilities
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
General Manager
$28,554
$24,091
$22,302
$22,119
$21,368
$20,698
$20,467
$19,787
$18,912
$18,311
$18,205
$18,020
$16,574
$14,923
12/17/2007
8/18/2008
12/31 /2007
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/5/2008
9/1/2007
5/31/2007
1/1/2008
5/1/2008
7/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
10/1/2008
7/1/2009
12/29/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
1/3/2009
9/1/2008
1/1/2009
5/1/2009
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
9/1/2009
3%
2 -5%
2 -6%
Unknown
2.5-6%
Unknown
4%
Unknown
Unknown
1-4%
Unknown
2 -6%
2 -5%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$20,417
-8.0%
$20,467
-8.2%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 8c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 9a of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Salary Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 El Dorado Irrigation District
2 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
3 Cucamonga Valley Water District
4 Union Sanitary District
5 City of Roseville
6 South Tahoe Public Utility District
7 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
8 Helix Water District
9 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Director of Human Resources 6
Human Resources Supervisor / Organizational Services Manager ° 9
Director of Administration 2
Human Resources Administrator 5
Assistant Human Resources Director'
Human Resources Director
Director of Human Resources
Human Resources Manager 8
Human Resources Manager
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$11,686
$10,639
$10,615
$10,061
$9,731
$9,407
$9,292
$8,886
$8,502
1/1/2008
12/31/2007
12/17/2007
9/1/2007
1/5/2008
1/10/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
7/13/2008
1/1/2009
12/29/2008
10/1/2008
9/1/2008
1/3/2009
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
1-4%
2 -6%
3%
Unknown
4%
2.5 -6%
Unknown
2 -5%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$9,926
-5.5%
$9,896
-5.2%
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 4 years of experience, including 1 year of administrative and supervisory responsibility.
2- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 5 year of experience, including 3 years of management and administrative responsibility.
3- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 7 years of experience.
4 -South Tahoe PUD's Class is bracketed by two or more comparators.
5- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a completion of 4 years of college and 5 year of experience.
6- Requires graduation from college and 15 years of experience.
7- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 10 years of increasingly responsible human resources management experience, including 5 years of
management and administrative responsibility.
8- Requires training and experience equivalent to graduation from a 4 year college or university and 10 years of progressively responsible human resources management experience.
9- Human Resources Supervisor requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 4 years of experience, Organizational Services Manager
requires a Bachelor's degree and 10 years of experience.
9 -5-08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Page 17b of 34
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Human Resources
Director
$9,407
$231
$635
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$107
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,140
$12,547
Amador Co Water
Agency
N/C
N/C
South Tahoe PubrEc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville Cucamonga Valley Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado
WD Sanitation Dist Sr Dist Irrigation Dist
Assistant HR Director of
Director Administration
$9,731
$778
$657
$62
$117
14 days
12 days
12.5 days
$584
Human Resources
Manager
$10,615 $8,502
$10,639 $11,686
$849 $680
$717 $574 $467
$806 $769
$127
15 days
13 days
3 days
$143 $140
$527 $527 $527
16 days
14 days
5 days
25 days
8 days
$510 $646
15 days
12 days
10 days
Elsinore Valley
Water District Helix Water District
HR Supv / Org Director of Director of Human Resources
Services Mgr HR Human Resources Manager
$9,292 $8,886
$650
$627
$112
10 days
13 days
5 days
$400 $400
$711
$338
$107
$527
$1,118 $969 $1,386
$1,244 $1,224
$148 $151 $186 $178 $97 $116 $ $1,164 $1,253 $ 6
$31
$20 $14 $30 $10 $6 $37
$21 17
$35 $5 $33 $31
$37 $31 $57 $31
$31 $45 $9
$2 $5 $5 $6
$4 $3 $3
29 days 3
12 days
$42
$3,558 $2,898 $3,987 $3,590
$3,654 $3,175 $3,102
N/C $13,289 $13,513
$12,489 $14,229 $15,340 $12,467 $11,988
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self- insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
3- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 18b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation 11 $12,547
South Tahoe North Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita
Public Utility District Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Agency Tahoe City PUD
Sanitation A
9 y District
Human Resources
Director
$9,407
$231
$635
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$107
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,140
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C HR
Administrator
$10,061
$604
$382
$36
$121
$1,367
$23
$49
$4
15 days
13 days
5 days
$292
N/C N/C N/C $2,877
N/C
N/C N/C N/C $12,938
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Pu'fic Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 El Dorado Irrigation District
2 Dublin San Ramon Services District
3 Cucamonga Valley Water District
4 City of Roseville
5 Union Sanitary District
6 South Tahoe Public Utility District
7 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
8 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
9 Helix Water District
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Director of Human Resources
Human Resources Supervisor / Organizational Services Manager
Director of Administration
Assistant Human Resources Director
Human Resources Administrator
Human Resources Director
Human Resources Manager
Director of Human Resources
Human Resources Manager
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$15,340
$14,229
$13,513
$13,289
$12,938
$12,547
$12,489
$12,467
$11,988
1/1/2008
12/31/2007
12/17/2007
1/5/2008
9/1/2007
1/10/2008
7/13/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2009
12/29/2008
10/1/2008
1/3/2009
9/1/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
1-4%
2 -6%
3%
4%
Unknown
2 -5%
2.5 -6%
Unknown
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$13,282
-5.9%
$13,114
-4.5%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 9c of 17
9 -10-08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
N/C - Non Comparator
1- Requires registration as Geologist and a Grade D3 Water Distribution Operator Certificate
2- Does not require any certifications.
Page 10a of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
HYDRO - GEOLOGIST
Top Next Next
Rank Comparator Agency Cl Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Class Title Salary Date Increase Increase
1 South Tahoe Public Utility District Hydro - Geologist'
$9,186 1/10/2008
2 Cucamonga Valley Water District Water Resource Administrator z
Amador County Water Agency N/C 58,955 12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
City of Roseville N/C
Delta Diablo Sanitation District N/C
Dublin San Ramon Services District N/C
El Dorado Irrigation District N/C
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District N/C
Helix Water District N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
Union Sanitary District N/C
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
HYDRO - GEOLOGIST
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Page 19b of 34
South Tahoe II
Public Utility District
Hydro - Geologist
$9,186
$225
$620
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$105
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,117
$12,303
Amador Co
Water Agency
South Tahoe PutTic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
N/C N/C Water Resource
Administrator
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
$8,955
$716
$604
$107
$1,029
$161
$15
$5
$26
$26
$5
15 days
13 days
2 days
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C $2,694 N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C $11,649 N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xis
Page 20b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
HYDRO - GEOLOGIST
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
ll
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Hydro - Geologist
$9,186
$225
$620
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$105
$ 1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,117
$12,303
North Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Water Agency Sanitation Agency Tahoe City PUD
9 y District
N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Pub& Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
HYDRO - GEOLOGIST
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 South Tahoe Public Utility District
2 Cucamonga Valley Water District
Amador County Water Agency
City of Roseville
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
Dublin San Ramon Services District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
Hydro - Geologist
Water Resource Administrator
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$12,303 1/10/2008
$11,649 12/17/2007 10/1/2008
3%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 10c of 17
9 -10-08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Helix Water District
2 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
3 Cucamonga Valley Water District
4 City of Roseville
5 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
6 El Dorado Irrigation District
7 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
8 Union Sanitary District
9 South Tahoe Public Utility District
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Information Services Manager
Director of Information Technology
Information Technology Officer
IT Operations Manager / Telecommunications Manager /
Systems Software Manager 1
Information Services Supervisor
Manager of Information Services
Information Technology Administrator
Information Systems Administrator
Information Systems Manager
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$10,801
$10,776
$9,626
$9,399
$9,249
$9,213
$9,138
$8,886
$8,758
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
12/17/2007
1/5/2008
12/31/2007
1/1/2008
7/13/2008
9/1/2007
1/10/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
10/1/2008
1/3/2009
12/29/2008
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
9/1/2008
Unknown
2.5 -6%
3%
4%
2 -6%
1-4%
2 -5%
Unknown
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$9,636
- 10.0 %
$9,324
-6.5%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1 -South Tahoe PUD's Class is bracketed by two or more comparators
Page 11a of 17
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Information
Systems Manager
$8,758
$215
$591
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$100
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,073
$11,831
Page 21b of 34
Amador Co Cucamonga Valley Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Water Agency City of Roseville
WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
IT Operations Mgr /
N/C Telecommunications Mgr / Info Technology Info Technology Information Services Manager of Director of Information
Sys Software Mgr Officer Administrator Supervisor Info Services Information Tech Services Mgr
$9,399 $9,626 $9,138 $9,249 $9,213 $10,776 $10,801
N/C
N/C
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
$752 $770 $731 $369 $754 $864
$634 $650 $617 $707 $622 $727 $410
$60
$113 $116 $126 $111 $129 $130
$527 $527 $527
$527
$1,118 $1,029 $1,386 $1,244 $1,224 $1,164 $1,253
$148 $161 $186 $178 $97 $116 $66
$20 $15 $30 $31 $21 $17
$34 $5 $13 $10 $6 $43 $38
$36 $28 $61 $52 $11
$28
$2 $5 $5 $6 $4 $3 $3
14 days 15 days 16 days 25 days 15 days 10 days 29 days 3
12 days 13 days 14 days 8 days 12 days 13 days 12 days
12.5 days 2 days 5 days 5 days
$400
$564 $646
$42
$3,481 $2,805 $3,555 $3,473 $2,958 $3,410 $3,360
$12,880 $12,431 $12,693 $12,721 $12,171 $14,186 $14,161
Note. Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self- insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
3- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 22b of 34
South Tahoe Pubffc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER
Agency
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
North Tahoe PUD
Santa Margarita Water
Agency
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
Tahoe Ci ty PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental 2
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation'
Other
Benefit Cost
Information
Systems Manager
$8,758
$215
$591
5527
$1,600
$21
$18
$100
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,073
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Info Systems
Administrator
$8,886
$533
$338
$32
$107
$1.367
$21
$44
15 days
13 days
5 days
$292
$2,736
Total Monthly Compensation
t II
$11,831 u
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$11,622
Page 22b of 34
South Tahoe Pubffc Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
2 Helix Water District
3 City of Roseville
4 Dublin San Ramon Services District
5 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
6 Cucamonga Valley Water District
7 El Dorado Irrigation District
8 South Tahoe Public Utility District
9 Union Sanitary District
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Director of Information Technology
Information Services Manager
IT Operations Manager / Telecommunications Manager /
Systems Software Manager
Information Services Supervisor
Information Technology Administrator
Information Technology Officer
Manager of Information Services
Information Systems Manager
Information Systems Administrator
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$14,186
$14,161
$12,880
$12,721
$12,693
$12,431
$12,171
$11,831
$11,622
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/5/2008
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
1/3/2009
2.5-6%
Unknown
4%
12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
12/17/2007 10/1/2008
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1-4%
1/10/2008
9/1/2007 9/1/2008 Unknown
3%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators $12,858
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below -8.7%
Median of Comparators $12,707
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below -7.4%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 11c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Union Sanitary District
2 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
3 Santa Margarita Water Agency
4 South Tahoe Public Utility District
5 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
6 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Amador County Water Agency
City of Roseville
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Coach - TPO Research and Support 5
Environmental Services Administrator
Water Quality Manager 3
Laboratory Director 1
Laboratory Supervisor °
Water Quality Supervisor 6
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$10,567
$9,466
$9,036
$8,141
$8,069
$7,259
9/1/2007
12/31/2007
7/1/2008
1/10/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/29/2008
7/1/2009
Unknown
2 -6%
Unknown
7/1/2009 Unknown
1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$8,880
-9.1%
$9,036
-11.0%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires an AWWA or CWEA Grade Ill Laboratory Technologist Certificate.
2- Requires Grade III Laboratory Analyst and Grade III Water Quality Analyst certificates.
3- Requires a CWEA Grade Ill Laboratory Analyst certificate
4- Requires CWEA Grade Ill Laboratory Technologist certificate.
5- Certifications required are not specified in classification description.
6- Requires a Grade Ill Laboratory Technology certificate (CWEA or AWWA) and T2 Water Treatment Operator certificate.
Page 12a of 17
9 -5-08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Laboratory
Director
$8,141
$200
$550
$505
$1,600
$21
$18
$93
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,987
$11,128
Page 23b of 34
Amador Co
Water Agency
N/C
South Tahoe PubT k Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District North Tahoe PUD
N/C N/C N/C Environmental Svcs N/C Water Quality N/C N/C
Administrator Supervisor
City of Roseville
$9,466 $7,259
$508
$722 $490
$128 $87
$527
$1,244 $1,164
$178 $116
$31 $21
$10 $29
$35
$6 $3
25 days
8 days
$646
10 days
13 days
N/C N/C N/C N/C $3,491 N/C $2,453 N/C N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C $12,957 N/C $9,712 N/C N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 24b of 34
South Tahoe Pub`iic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Santa Margarita
Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation 1
Other
Benefit Cost
Laboratory
Director
$8,141
$200
$550
$505
$1,600
$21
$18
$93
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,987
Water Quality
Manager
$9,036
$723
$610
$58
$108
$902
$41
$17
$56
$97
$108
$3
24 days 2
10 5 days
$145
$2,870
Laboratory
Supervisor
$8.069
$646
$545
$2,001
$142
$21
$43
15 days
11 days
$3,397
N/C
N/C
Coach - TPO
Research & Support
$10,567
$63
$402
$38
$127
$1,367
$22
$52
$4
15 days
13 days
5 days
$310
$292
$3,247
Total Monthly Compensation
$11,128
$11,906
$11,466
N/C
$13,814
Page 24b of 34
South Tahoe Pub`iic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Put Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Union Sanitary District
2 Dublin San Ramon Services District
3 Santa Margarita Water Agency
4 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
5 South Tahoe Public Utility District
6 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Amador County Water Agency
City of Roseville
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Coach - TPO Research and Support
Environmental Services Administrator
Water Quality Manager
Laboratory Supervisor
Laboratory Director
Water Quality Supervisor
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$13,814
512,957
$11,906
$11,466
$11,128
$9,712
9/1/2007
12/31/2007
7/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/10/2008
1/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/29/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
Unknown
2 -6%
Unknown
Unknown
1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$11,971
-7.6%
$11,906
-7.0%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 12c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
LAND APPLICATION MANAGER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top
Monthly Effective
Salary Date
Next
Salary
Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 South Tahoe Public Utility District
Amador County Water Agency
City of Roseville
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
Dublin San Ramon Services District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Union Sanitary District
Land Application Manager t
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$9,186 1/10/2008
NOTE
All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
N/C - Non Comparator
1- Requires possession of at least one of the following: California Grade II Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator, Grade II Water Treatment Operator, Water Distribution Operator
Grade II Collection Systems Maintenance Certificate or Grade II Maintenance Technologist Certificate.
Page 13a of 17
South Tahoe Pub..c Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgn,t.xls
LAND APPLICATION MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Pub lic Utility District
Land Application
Manager
$9,186
$225
$620
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$105
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$60
$3,177
$12,363
Page 25b of 34
Amador Co
Water Agency
South Tahoe Pub Tic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
Cucamonga Valley Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C
Note. Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 26b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
LAND APPLICATION MANAGER
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Land Application
Manager
$9,186
$225
$620
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$105
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$60
$3,177
$12,363
North Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita Water Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Agency Sanitation Agency Tahoe City PUD
9 Y District
N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
N/C
N/C N/C N/C N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Pudic Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
LAND APPLICATION MANAGER
Total Next Next
Rank Comparator Agency Cl Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Class Title Comp Date Increase Increase
1 South Tahoe Public Utility District Land Application Manager
Amador County Water Agency N/C
City of Roseville N/C
Cucamonga Valley Water District N/C
Delta Diablo Sanitation District N/C
Dublin San Ramon Services District N/C
El Dorado Irrigation District N/C
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District N/C
Helix Water District N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
Union Sanitary District N/C
$12,363 1/10/2008
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
Insufficient data to do analysis
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 13c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively
1- Requires Grade T3 Water Treatment Operator, Grade D4 Water Distribution Operator, and Grade III Collection Systems Maintenance certificates.
2- South Tahoe PUD's Class is bracketed by two or more comparators.
3- Water Production Superintendent requires a 05 Water Distribution Operator certificate; Construction and Maintenance Superintendent requires a D3 Water Distribution Operator certificate.
4- Does not require any certifications.
5- Requires a Grade IV Water Distribution Operator, Grade III Collection System Maintenance and Grade I Water Treatment certificates.
6- Depending on area of assignment, may be required to hold any or all of the following certificates: T2 Water Treatment Plant Operator. D5 Water Distribution, Grade III Mechanical
Technologist, and /or Grade III Collection System certificates.
7- Requires a T3 Water Treatment Operator and Grade III Collection System Maintenance certificates.
8- Requires a Grade IV Water Treatment Operator, Grade III Wastewater Treatment Operator. and Grade IV Water Distribution Operator certificates.
9- Maintenance Manager does not require any certifications: Wastewater Operations Manager requires Grade V Wastewater Treatment Operator, Grade IV Wastewater Collection Systems,
and Grade I Environmental Compliance Inspector certificates.
MANAGER OF FIELD OPERATIONS
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Union Sanitary District
2 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
3 South Tahoe Public Utility District
4 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
5 Santa Margarita Water Agency
6 Dublin San Ramon Services District
7 Tahoe City Public Utility District
8 Amador County Water Agency
9 Cucamonga Valley Water District
City of Roseville
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Collection Services Manager 4
Maintenance Manager / Field Services Manager 2,4
Manager of Field Operations I
Maintenance Manager / Wastewater Operations Manager 2,9
Field Operations Superintendent 6
Field Operations Supervisor 5
Utilities Superintendent 7
Operations Manager 6
Water Production Superintendent / Construction & Maint Supt 2,3
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$12,994
$11,741
$10,658
$10,256
$9,941
$9,039
$8,790
$8,754
$8,449
9/1/2007 9/1/2008 Unknown
7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
1/10/2008
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2 -6%
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 Unknown
1/1/2008 9/1/2009 2 -5%
12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$9,996
6.2%
Median of Comparators $9,490
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below 11.0%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Page 14a of 17
South Tahoe Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
MANAGER OF FIELD OPERATIONS
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation I
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Manager of Field
Operations
$10,658
$262
$719
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$122
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$60
$3,330
$13,988
Page 27b of 34
$613
$527
$1,177
$101
$22
$28
$44
$7
$3
15 days
12 days
6 days
$333
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
Amador Co Cucamonga Valley
Water Agency City of Roseville
WD
Water Production
Operations N/C Supt / Construction
Manager & Maint Supt
$8,754 $8,449
$11,741
$676
$570
$101
$1,029
$161
$15
$5
$25
$25
$5
15 days
13 days
2 days
$2,856 N/C $2,611 $5,181
$11,610 N/C $11,059 $16,922
Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado
Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist
Maint Mgr / Field Operations
Field Sery Mgr Supervisor
$939
$793
$527
$1,386
$186
$30
$33
$79
$5
16 days
14 days
5 days
$500
$9,039
$692
$123
$527
$1,244
$178
$31
$10
$6
25 days
8 days
$704 $646
$3,455 N/C
$12,494 N/C
N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
2- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Water District District
Maint Manager / N/C
WW Ops Mgr
$10,256
$718
$692
$123
$1,164
$116
$21
$41
$49
$3
10 days
13 days
5 days
$2,927
$13,183
N/C
N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 28b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
MANAGER OF FIELD OPERATIONS
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation I
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Manager of Field
Operations
$10,658
$262
$719
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$122
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$60
$3,330
$13,988
North Tahoe PUD Santa Margarita Tahoe - Truckee Union Sanitary
Water Agency Sanitation Agency Tahoe City PUD
9 y District
N/C
N/C
Field Operations
Superintendent
$9,941
$795
$671
$64
$119
N/C
Utilities Collection
Superintendent Svcs Manager
$8,790 $12,994
$703 $780
$593 $494
$56 $47
$105 $156
$527
$902 $1,367
$1,254
$41 $95
$17 $18
$56 $14 $30
$106 $63 $64
$119
$3 $20 $4
24 days 2 27 days 15 days
10.5 days 11 days 13 days
5 days
$450 $310
$145 $176 $292
$3,040 N/C $4,076 $3,542
N/C
$12,982 N/C $12,866 $16,536
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08 .xIs
MANAGER OF FIELD OPERATIONS
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
2 Union Sanitary District
3 South Tahoe Public Utility District
4 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
5 Santa Margarita Water Agency
6 Tahoe City Public Utility District
7 Dublin San Ramon Services District
8 Amador County Water Agency
9 Cucamonga Valley Water District
City of Roseville
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Maintenance Manager / Field Services Manager
Collection Services Manager
Manager of Field Operations
Maintenance Manager / Wastewater Operations Manager
Field Operations Superintendent
Utilities Superintendent
Field Operations Supervisor
Operations Manager
Water Production Superintendent / Construction & Maint Supt
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$16,922
$16,536
$13,988
$13,183
$12,982
$12,866
$12,494
$11,610
$11,059
7/13/2008
9/1/2007
1/10/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
12/31 /2007
1/1/2008
12/17/2007
7/1/2009 2 -5%
9/1/2008 Unknown
1/1/2009
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
12/29/2008
9/1/2009
10/1/2008
2.5 -6%
Unknown
Unknown
2 -6%
2 -5%
3%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$13,457
3.8%
$12,924
7.6%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 14c of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
9 -10-08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Pulnrc Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
MANAGER OF PLANT OPERATIONS
Rank Comparator Agency Class Title
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Union Sanitary District Treatment and Disposal Services Manager 1 4 $12,994 9/1/2007 9/1/2008 Unknown
2 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency Plant Superintendent 1,3 $10,941 7/1/2008 7/1/2009 Unknown
3 South Tahoe Public Utility District Manager of Plant Operations 1 $10,339 1/10/2008
4 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Wastewater Operations Manager $10,256 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
5 Dublin San Ramon Services District a Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations Supervisor 1 $9,466 12/31/2007 12/29/2008 2-6%
6 Delta Diablo Sanitation District Plant Manager 1,2 $9,142 7/13/2008 7/1/2009 2 -5%
Amador County Water Agency N/C
City of Roseville N/C
Cucamonga Valley Water District N/C
El Dorado Irrigation District N/C
Helix Water District N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$10,560
-2.1%
$10,256
0.8%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% and $646 from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security and deferred compensation contribution, respectively.
1- Requires a Grade V Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator certificate.
2- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 7 years of experience
3- Also requires Grade III Hazardous Materials Technician certificate.
4- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and several years of supervisory experience.
5- Requires Grade V Wastewater Treatment Operator, Grade IV Wastewater Collection Systems, and Grade I Environmental Compliance Inspector certificates.
Page 15a of 17
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
MANAGER OF PLANT OPERATIONS
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Page 29b of 34
South Tahoe Amador Co
Public Utility District II Water Agency
Manager of Plant
Operations
$10,339
$254
$698
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$118
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$60
$3,297
$13,636
N/C
N/C
N/C
South Tahoe Pu�ic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville Cucamonga Valley
WD
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Delta Diablo
Sanitation Dist
Plant WW Treatment Plant
Manager Operations Supervisor
$9,142
$731
$617
$527
$1,386
$186
$30
$33
$61
$5
16 days
14 days
5 days
$500
$549
$4,624
$13,766
Dublin San Ramon
Srvs Dist
$9,466
$722
$128
$527
$1,244
$178
$31
$10
$6
25 days
8 days
$646
$3,491
$12,957
El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Irrigation Dist Water District District
N/C
N/C
N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- Dublin San Ramon Services District's Mid - Management employees also received a $1,000 one time Deferred Contribution on 1/1/2008.
WW Operations
Manager
$10,256
$718
$692
$123
$1,164
$116
$21
$41
$49
$3
10 days
13 days
5 days
$2,927
$13,184
N/C
N/C
N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 30b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
MANAGER OF PLANT OPERATIONS
Agency
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water
North Tahoe PUD
Agency
Tahoe- Truckee
Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation'
Other
Benefit Cost
Manager of Plant
Operations
$10,339
$254
$698
$547
$1,600
$21
$118
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$60
$3,297
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Plant
Superintendent
$10,941
$875
$739
$2,001
$142
$21
$58
30 days Y
11 da
days
Y
$450
$4,286
N/C
N/C
District
Treatment &
Disposal Svcs Mgr
$12,994
$780
$494
$47 5
$156
$1,367
$30
$64
$4
15 da s
Y
13 days
5 days
$310
$292
$3,542
Total Monthly Compensation
$13,636
N/C
N/C
$15,227
N/C
$16,536
Page 30b of 34
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
MANAGER OF PLANT OPERATIONS
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 Union Sanitary District
2 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
3 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
4 South Tahoe Public Utility District
5 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
6 Dublin San Ramon Services District
Amador County Water Agency
City of Roseville
Cucamonga Valley Water District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Treatment and Disposal Services Manager
Plant Superintendent
Plant Manager
Manager of Plant Operations
Wastewater Operations Manager
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations Supervisor
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$16,536
$15,227
$13,766
$13,636
$13,184
$12,957
9/1/2007
7/1/2008
7/13/2008
1/10/2008
1/1/2008
12/31/2007
9/1/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
Unknown
Unknown
2 -5%
1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
12/29/2008 2-6%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$14,334
-5.1%
$13,766
-1.0%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 15c of 17
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
South Tahoe Pit. -.c Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
PURCHASING AGENT
Top Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Rank Comparator Agency Class Title Salary Date Increase Increase
1 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Purchasing Manager' $8.419 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 2.5 -6%
2 Cucamonga Valley Water District Purchasing & Warehouse Officer 2 $8,074 12/17/2007 10/1/2008 3%
3 Union Sanitary District Purchasing Agent 4 $8,056 9/1/2007 9/1/2008 Unknown
4 South Tahoe Public Utility District Purchasing Agent $7,683 1/10/2008
5 Delta Diablo Sanitation District Purchasing Manager $7,667 07/13/08 07/01/09 2 -5%
Amador County Water Agency N/C
City of Roseville N/C
Dublin San Ramon Services District N/C
El Dorado Irrigation District N/C
Helix Water District N/C
North Tahoe Public Utility District N/C _
Santa Margarita Water Agency N/C
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency N/C
Tahoe City Public Utility District N/C
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$8,054
-4.8%
$8,065
-5.0%
N/C - Non Comparator
1- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 7 years of experience., including 4 years of administrative and supervisory experience.
2- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 5 years of experience, including 2 years in a supervisory or leadership capacity.
3- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to a Bachelor's degree and 5 years of experience.
4- Requires any combination of education and experience equivalent to completion of 4 year's college and 4 years of increasingly responsible journey -level experience;
Page 16a of 17
9 -5-08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
PURCHASING AGENT
Agency
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Page 31b of 34
South Tahoe I Amador Co
I
Public Utility District Water Agency
Purchasing
Agent
$7,683
$189
$519
$476
$1,600
$21
$18
$88
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,911
$10,594
South Tahoe Pu`b'lic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville Cucamonga Valley Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
N/C N/C Purchasing & Purchasing N/C
Warehouse Officer Manager N/C Purchasing
Manager
$8,074 $7,667
$646
$545
$97
$613
$517
$475
$1,029 $1,386
$161 $186 $1,164
$15 $30 $116
$5 $33 $21
$33
$23 $51
$23 $40
$5 $5 $3
15 days 16 days 10 days
13 days 14 days 13 days
2 days 5 days 5 days
$460
$8,419
$589
$568
$101
N/C N/C $2,549 $3,756 N/C N/C $2,637 N/C
N/C N/C $10,623 $11,423 N/C N/C $11,055 N/C
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
N/C
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 32b of 34
South Tahoe Pu Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
PURCHASING AGENT
Agency
South Tahoe
Public Util' District
rtY
North Tahoe PUD
Santa Margarita
Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee
Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and/or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Purchasing
Agent
$7,683
$189
$519
$476
$1,600
SY1
$18
$88
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$2,911
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
Purchasing
Agent
$8,056
$483
$306
$
$97
$1,367
$19
$39
$
15 days
13 days
5 days
$292
$2,636
Total Monthly Compensation
$10,594
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$10,692
Page 32b of 34
South Tahoe Pu Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
PURCHASING AGENT
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next Next
Monthly Effective Salary Percentage
Comp Date Increase Increase
1 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
2 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
3 Union Sanitary District
4 Cucamonga Valley Water District
5 South Tahoe Public Utility District
Amador County Water Agency
City of Roseville
Dublin San Ramon Services District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Helix Water District
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Santa Margarita Water Agency
Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Purchasing Manager
Purchasing Manager
Purchasing Agent
Purchasing & Warehouse Officer
Purchasing Agent
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
$11,423
$11,055
$10,692
$10,623
$10,594
07/13/08
1/1/2008
9/1/2007
12/17/2007
1/10/2008
07/01/09
1/1/2009
9/1/2008
10/1/2008
2 -5%
2.5 -6%
Unknown
3%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$10,948
-3.3%
$10,873
-2.6%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 16c of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
SENIOR ENGINEER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Top Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Salary Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Santa Margarita Water Agency
2 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
3 Cucamonga Valley Water District
4 Dublin San Ramon Services District a
5 Helix Water District
6 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
7 South Tahoe Public Utility District
8 Union Sanitary District
9 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
10 City of Roseville
11 El Dorado Irrigation District
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Senior Project Engineer 1 ' 2
Senior Engineer 1,2
Senior Engineer 1,2
Senior Civil Engineer - SME 1
Civil Engineer 3
Senior Civil Engineer
Senior Engineer 1
Senior Engineer 2
Senior Engineer 1.2
Senior Engineer 1,2
Senior Engineer 1,2
N/C
N/C
N/C
$10,942
$9,699
$9,628
$9,594
$9,330
$9,292
$9,186
$9,127
$9,114
$8,902
$8,140
7/1/2008
7/13/2008
12/17/2007
12/31/2007
7/1/2008
1/1/2008
1/10/2008
9/1/2007
7/1/2008
1/5/2008
1/1/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
10/1/2008
12/29/2008
7/1/2009
1/1/2009
9/1/2008
7/1/2009
1/3/2009
1/1/2009
Unknown
2 -5%
3%
2 -6%
Unknown
2.5 -6%
Unknown
Unknown
4%
1-4%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$9,377
-2.1%
$9,311
-1.4%
N/C - Non Comparator
a) Reduced 6.2% from published salary schedule due to spiking to cover EE portion of Social Security.
1- Requires Registration as a Professional Civil Engineer.
2- Provides supervision of other staff
Page 17a of 17
South Tahoe PO,�,,,c Utility District
Top Monthly Salary Data
September 2008
9 -5 -08 APPENDIX II Top Monthly Salary Mgmt.xls
SENIOR ENGINEER
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Total Monthly Compensation
Page 33b of 34
South Tahoe II Amador Co
Public Utility District Water Agency
Senior
Engineer
$9,186
$225
$620
$527
$1,600
$21
$18
$105
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,117
$12,303
N/C
South Tahoe PutTic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
City of Roseville
Senior Senior Senior Senior Civil Senior
Engineer Senior Civil Civil
En
9 Engineer Engineer Engineer - SME Engineer Engineer 9 Engineer
$8,902 $9,628 $9,699
$9,594 $8,140 $9,292
$9,330
$712 $770 $776
$601 $650 $655
$57
$107 $116
$1,118 $1,029 $1,386 $1,244 $1,224 $1,164
$148 $161 $186 $178 $
$20 $15 $30 $31 $97 $21 $116 $ $ 6
$17
$32 $5 $33 $13
$37 $10 $6 $33
$34 $28 $65 $45 $9
$28
$2 $5 $ $6
$4 $3 $3
14 days
12 days
12.5 days
$534
Cucamonga Delta Diablo Dublin San Ramon El Dorado Elsinore Valley Helix Water
Valley WD Sanitation Dist Srvs Dist Irrigation Dist Water District District
15 days
13 days
2 days
$326 $650 $746
$688 $549 $627 $355
$130 $98 $112 $112
$527 $527 $505 $578
16 days
14 days
5 days
25 days
8 days
$582 $646
15 days
12 days
5 days
10 days
13 days
5 days
29 days 2
12 days
$42
N/C $3,365 $2,806 $4,243
$3 $2,808 $2,775 $3,213
N/C $12,267 $12,434 $13,943
$13,052 $10,947 $12,067 $12,543
Note: Total Monthly Compensation number may vary slightly from the sum of its components due to cell formulas & rounding.
1- El Dorado Irrigation District provides self- insured plans for Dental and Vision benefits. The cost paid by EID equals the amount paid for Dental and Vision.
The amount reflects the total amount budgeted for per month divided by the total number of EE.
2- Helix Water District offers a Paid Time Off (PTO) benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
3- Santa Margarita Water District offers a General Leave benefit that combines vacation and sick leaves.
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
Page 34b of 34
South Tahoe Pubic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
SENIOR ENGINEER
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
North Tahoe PUD
Santa Margarita
Water Agency
Tahoe- Truckee
Sanitation Agency
9 y
Tahoe City PUD
Union Sanitary
District
Senior
Engineer
$9,127
$548
$347
$33
$1,367
$21
$45
$4
13 da
days
5 days
$292
$2,765
Class Title
Top Monthly Salary
Employee Retirement
PERS
ER -Paid EE Contribution
Enhanced PERS Formula
EPMC
12 Month Highest Salary
Social Security
Other
Insurance
Cafeteria
Health
Dental '
Vision
Life
LTD
STD and /or SDI
EAP
Other
Leave
Vacation
Holidays
Administrative
Auto Allowance
Deferred Compensation
Other
Benefit Cost
Senior
Engineer
$9,186
$225
$620
$527
$1,600
$21
$105
$1
15 days
11 days + 3 hours
$3,117
N/C
N/C
Senior Project
Engineer
$10,942
$875
$739
$70
$131
$902
$
$17
$ 7
$131
$3
24 days 3
10.5 days
$145
$3,229
Senior
Engineer
$9,114
$729
$615
$2,001
$142
$21
$48
15 days
11 days
$3,556
N/C
N/C
Total Monthly Compensation
$12,303 jJ
N/C
$14,171
$12,670
N/C
$11,892
Page 34b of 34
South Tahoe Pubic Utility District
Benefits Detail
September 2008
STPUD APPENDIX II Benefits Detail Mgmt 09 10 08.xls
SENIOR ENGINEER
Rank Comparator Agency
Class Title
Total Next
Monthly Effective Salary
Comp Date Increase
Next
Percentage
Increase
1 Santa Margarita Water Agency
2 Delta Diablo Sanitation District
3 Dublin San Ramon Services District
4 Tahoe - Truckee Sanitation Agency
5 Helix Water District
6 Cucamonga Valley Water District
7 South Tahoe Public Utility District
8 City of Roseville
9 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
10 Union Sanitary District
11 El Dorado Irrigation District
Amador County Water Agency
North Tahoe Public Utility District
Tahoe City Public Utility District
Senior Project Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Civil Engineer - SME
Senior Engineer
Civil Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Civil Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Engineer
N/C
N/C
N/C
$14,171
$13,943
$13,052
$12,670
$12,543
$12,434
$12,303
$12,267
$12,067
$11,892
$10,947
7/1/2008
7/13/2008
12/31/2007
7/1/2008
7/1/2008
12/17/2007
1/10/2008
1/5/2008
1/1/2008
9/1/2007
1/1/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
12/29/2008
7/1/2009
7/1/2009
10/1/2008
1/3/2009
1/1/2009
9/1/2008
1/1/2009
Unknown
2 -5%
2 -6%
Unknown
Unknown
3%
4%
2.5-6%
Unknown
1-4%
NOTE: All calculations exclude South Tahoe Public Utility District
Average of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
Median of Comparators
% South Tahoe Public Utility District Above /Below
$12,599
-2.4%
$12,489
-1.5%
N/C - Non Comparator
Page 17c of 17
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Total Monthly Compensation Data
September 2008
9 -10 -08 APPENDIX II Total Monthly Comp Mgmt.xls
Page 1 of 1
Appendix III
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Monthly Salary Schedule
Management
September 2008
Salary Range #
21
22
23
24
33
34
35
36
Minimum
12820
13141
13461
13798
Monthly Salary Range
5327
5460
5593
5733
5873
6020
6167
6321
6475
6637
6799
6969
7139
7317
7496
7683
7870
8067
8264
8471
8677
8894
9111
9339
9567
9806
10045
10296
10547
10811
11074
11351
11628
11919
12210
12515
6799
6969
7139
7317
7496
7683
7870
8067
8264
8471
8677
8894
9111
9339
9567
9806
10045
10296
10547
10811
11074
11351
11628
11919
7139
7317
7496
7683
7870
8067
8264
8471
8677
8894
9111
9339
9567
9806
10045
10296
10547
10811
11074
11351
11628
11919
12210
12515
12820
13141
13461
13798
8264
8471
8677
8894
13461
13798
14134
14487
8677
8894
9111
9339
9111
9339
9567
9806
5593
5733
5873
6020
6167
6321
6475
6637
12210
12515
12820
13141
13461
13798
14134
14487
5873
6020
6167
6321
6475
6637
6799
6969
14134
14487
14841
15212
6167
6321
6475
6637
6799
6969
7139
7317
7496
7683
7870
8067
9111
9339
9567
9806
10045
10296
10547
10811
11074
11351
11628
11919
12210
12515
12820
13141
14841
15212
15583
15972
6475
6637
6799
6969
7139
7317
7496
7683
7870
8067
8264
8471
9567
9806
10045
10296
10547
10811
11074
11351
11628
11919
12210
12515
12820
13141
13461
13798
14134
14487
14841
15212
15583
15972
16362
16771
Maximum
6799
6969
7139
7317
7496
7683
7870
8067
8264
8471
8677
8894
10045
10296
10547
10811
11074
11351
11628
11919
12210
12515
12820
13141
13461
13798
14134
14487
14841
15212
15583
15972
16362
16771
17180
17610
9/26/2008 All Ranges
Appendix IV
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Range Placement Recommendations
Management
September 2008
Class Title
Current Max. Market
Monthly Salary Placement
Proposed Proposed Max. Percent
Salary Range Monthly Salary Difference Rationale
Accounting Manager
$8,091
$8,573
11
$8,677
7.24% Market and range placement and internal alignment
Assistant General Manager /Engineer
$13,244
$13,689
30
$13,798
4.18% Market and range placement
Associate Engineer
$7,877
N/A
8
$8,067
2.41% Internal placement (15% below Senior Engineer)
Chief Financial Officer
$11,323
$12,504
26
$12,515
10.53% Market and range placement
Customer Service Manager
$8,091
$8,588
11
$8,677
7.24% Market and range placement
District Information Officer
$8,491
$7,642
6
$7,683
- 9.52% Market and range placement
Engineering Department Manager
$11,491
$12,500
Market and range placement and internal alignment
24 $11,919 3.72% (market median is based on comparators that require a
P.E. license, which STPUD's class does not)
$8 677 7 24% Internal placement (align with Accounting Manager and
Customer Service Manager)
Executive Services Manager
$8,091 Insufficent Data
11
General Manager
$14,767
$15,770
35
$15,583
5.52% Market and range placement
Human Resources Director
$9,407
$9,896
16
$9,806
4.24% Market and range placement
Hydro - Geologist
$9,186 Insufficent Data
14
$9,339
1.66% Internal placement (align with Senior Engineer)
Information Systems Manager
$8,758
$9,324
14
$9,339
6.63% Market and range placement
Laboratory Director
$8,141
$9,036
13
$9,111
11.91% Market and range placement
Land Application Manager
$9,186 Insufficent Data
14
$9,339
1.66% Internal placement (align with Senior Engineer)
Manager of Field Operations
$10,658 $9,490 18 $10,296 -3.40% Market and range placement and internal alignment with
Manager of Plant Operations
Manager of Plant Operations
$10,339
$10,256
18
$10,296
-0.42% Market and range placement
Principal Engineer
$10,339
N/A
19 $10 547 2 01 % Internal placement (12.5% above Senior Engineer and
12.5% below Engineering Department Manager)
Purchasing Agent
$7,683
$8,065
8
$8,067
5.00% Market and range placement
Senior Engineer $9,186
$9,311
14 $9,339
1.66% Market and range placement
Page 1 of 1
10/7/2008 Alpha
ed. 1 avbfic Utility Doealet
1
..1, *mere A AY A at,,,,,e velAee sire 4*e 1.
L***reemq *wee Rep* ANTA CAA** *Aeon Ma***
Z ....'........T. g7 , r .......d ...,..;,,...
AMARA Water DMA* OA We ler leedeny.. AAA Ilem end
ese. AA* OP.* *Am...A e M*****Pee..**Je 1*,.
::=.,
en
Any**. FAA *Ara* .e Amoral el. OfAreben, en Mee a PreMel
I v*. .r.". "...........'......... " .....",...^
'''''"d.'...'M'W........'."............'...''...•..
new IA beenerne ea* eur at he mel A At *Ale. an, A** *we A
........., ....re*. l• e•erne•AAA9
Pene*Sce AMP Ape*,
Cor.plep le P,PS ...a..
AAA* %IAA* la *Ana... *eft AAA me owe Alms *cm . wee lerynA
feemear.. A *FA.* ie mem. . el kr e.t.a,*
AA. *us *Al FE mel rweet eve***Ne be creAA isera
emere****,,CTO*11* rale AI 5 Mb.* ewe 1 *a e
sp. AAA . teamed,* ClOnan *Am wr, no Ale pelen *I
*An. EE Es. EF way edenreeleat* IAA
ehreT4**,110 Erry,orynerta ,,,t.,,,,,
aNANAtea An. nom ts On ea.* Ea .n. e•Ne N.., DA are AN,...Neos■ A no, of PERS
*AA *Ks WA** a nelneeten boy da het pesereArnee*Ah eme. A IAA, earn, •( re -
smiunsnon•reasel5,...a..,100,120.■••••■■■m• FEwhoten,EFIS,...,...v.
E
e y erene,weesz on me nincen**Aleare*.enwereekeentee,e'Resemeesne***-*LI T .
glieexpeeteetneneel*Ambewees *et onceenFeneceme*Alemeeemeeevetectee■
ean. ene**1.1,*Weeemeltem. km* MI AA* • pre e*FeSsedee am* 11hree Ae• *
wares nerceserArein* nAle wen el. ume **A We* •eAdie Er
_ _, ,,,, ,,,, ..,..,,
'''.....'-' '''''''''
'......
ii,*,, ene *Ahem* Ef I *A ef a• FE • aceeen****aern * * *Are le re.
d *** ■ ae******** e se M. 1,,,,,,,,,,.,,...• x,,, ,E .., a ,.
A....e.on
3170;01, •p...elaur..5.4,m. A.A.* ele**Amecee AAA.,
ear* Ate 1. pae• rl Ar eft* e an. ea,*,,,.....
vele.Aeree'VereFesmen*AIDAta*,1,00nen,bonreiremeel
Anne*,,Aelaysols***.,1200** runew*"..***euele.M6
...*, ...V. ••••• •A*A•A ese Er •A ••••AA ee sel AAA.* AAA eAern eee
*Are **Atom es en*,,n,e an**** ***teen Am**, tA, No.,
*es.*** Derfeerne,* pa. A CA pee Men* ems** measles Fro* EF mina
1
"...„,.."'...".'''.M.'.'..'''''..a"r"'"..m.
''''''' mum • CA Nalessand f qwer C.a. lef 14 *we *Ow
.............." ...'.....'........
eassenere of CO* wer****,me *a *ma en Yeamee AM* A EFI,,* a
, oPAPAaNa•APP......0.ProNanwannoptoloNa.Alea.........A.
An. Ateped edwie el EE Vow. nye* liret** Ald*Aeuneleen ej.Ef dm. A
aAvienionelaren•Asirriedteff rate**Annyale.....anreduenere***,
*rem.* te yen e. ARA ef noarce ire. .1 An enre II Arlan •• a s a* inneenats• I,
*ern AA...A eAAA***1.1*et GOA ...Abe*
,, •• • ••••A*A. AAA* A**n.eede l ei
*am.* to wee *ones Awes. no of ern. Ate in fer rorovenessubs ATEA*
*DA 6 *nee., *AC* . Fe melt* reAre ma
. A '5,eltne maim Oben.*** eAuee 0,e,, *nee
lAtre nelbease**0** .te*eee'seuernAmeeres Arne
Ad pereamen*******In eep neee ay.., **2••• •••, •Ae•
Amer** AAA
Sutimen*Orallen Ale*,Aris•
. 1.6 lea, OP el we Mee no :Are eon Demerwene d It * DA lena a a a
1 ego. a/ **FARA EE **1 m A eve Ile/AO rechAng feee *V AA rere ewe On. ee•s, el A
nee one *we kene PA* enn A •5 ,....”.........,.................* t
Nla.m......"....m.Nr..............NA a...or...A...An
I.* a a* seeme . al a. An ricusgteets,ms. 8 *ter• AA pa■ emftere *meet 1
****e•rwrvevernen*rones
1
"'"' '"" ""'" '''' "°"' ''" "'" ''' '
**peep...me*
AAA* A e 2 es r mee... emereeme, **VAN,* AA 11 ret.A1e Anen
1••••,0.rms......1s. am...nal...rot EA,Ancon........•
eAtree Ateeles we ret ,,, eeused***Aelpmeeeee
y,,,rn.,..•p..,,,,a.m..,,,..f ,,,,,,,,,,,
eareeneArn row *ever, I•e* elms. *el A NUSTI110•01 D
.....,,,
"'...''''''''....'. '..r ''''''''''
ceeneeleme ea roe* I* ena A ...norm Awe t • sena
inentuteetwAelbeweencealme
Dena DIAIIC San. an DAVAO
'..``"..'`..."`.°'...”•'''.....'*°"°""*".."'"'"`""""..'
ear ewes. A A a roan., e1100,4e Anuee *we
PO, oPEEs 25 NPAPPlaAAAPOPP
*en rename krosu** *ft a A.01***re Awe Y. A en AA * reams end a
wed le *nue AA. nem.* Nreee *1 *we Beeelse eneeve*A.* me leeee
Ao••••.......9NANPPe•■••••....rna•CAP•NPAL......
S and 1.***nee Er l*1 ream Cane
........ .. E'''''' 7.
*
11 ... ,,,, ........m.**walpaM.., M.o.* ne
sas,..........pa ovAN.....rAva
sA.A. Awn...A Gen. int. aidapan
0*****eserao s*leme• Waimea Perg A.** -- s*
'.....'".......
spa
AAA*. * e.e•PArn• Ere -----
Awe ototerelnew*s. is remAge 11**,6 rA nen a*** e•
erneenA.Ine A lee Se lemn enee.e.omee *a eten mei. eeee le
...,,,,... ...„.„,,, ,,,...,., e
wed Nis, am... eplon be wow.. mem,. se••••• Paw
.,,,,..,,,..........,,,,,,,,..,..,•a.......,......*
. le Sel Pam, SANNes Dst c•
isond MtleremArttet Sew marg ,Ae Genees IA,* 9.1,144 *Am a• m.o. veers Ine
myna. m.o.-ANNA poi noss"..n of Naos.. PON. to• m e• nem non ....A.
,....,
WAAL lamere
CAnd *lee ere *Wenn, Ae eee, Hmenr en Awe. el n•We ex . A* ye e**1 INA. ,,...........,....,..,,,........,„...,..........,...........
AAA An. wee an In Adeeme ea.
ee,
Nowa. FAANompanuo Sow wog. no Dow* INPNA
AePern met,* A *Awn 1111
EFe Am ronweem MPS stAke ***AN um**
Is* &we Ara eft* ge Ana cree tan I Or.* EE a.. A Ea...A.
•sell beer 1 ream* *eve V.* leva IAA*, or*. 5 ....ere> /ea A*
ma....e..... Oa., . •AA Nor ...t. 25 eon ........• PI ...m. .
SP.0 a••••••%.....a.1.30.. amnion. PEASNA.• P.
MM..... Y..% he./...01•••••..0111.an 1■11.0.• FE
E D,aac +Neon Ds■Pc'
P.155(0 • • en**.
** le eareee.A, Ated Armee, **A
egolfte
to*
V ne* e•Arreversenoeae el. el gee** traneeeme. A. K
ef *AL**Inftebea enn
E snore ,aaa• 0 Neter De*,
As 5•Ars awn* Fe eme nore AAA le rant reete EE IA mane A AreleAe r**** FAME` •re
...I.A. num.,* NA roam ..... ocra NetA. Nam sow. Aup ....■
**Feena IA* *we AM*** el tem Ance . Ef Ai* AAA*
1 ... SO Pre en oe, *us *en,. 63,,e•A ee a* AAA it Y. to
create ...Az. A /es /1* FE AA Aare eia en beech ■2 moles e'
Abe *Ye thereAter •■• 1 Newlyn alb°. Twang! A.A..... A
t*eneelpeteeEE•eseamenthoe.eroof worn EFINAse.
LI A* *a elm. c, *raw de.* el in•FE, semets reuvr
no. an. EE Pate er.s.a ata No ha of up. awn von era*. of
Aan *Armen e Aware,* leo MIA. ...ye wall•,..11..Et• Ift..•■■•
NaN pa EE No NPoroa EAAvo nast.00Nn dot:nape canAd ...a i
ime peem. HAM ea la *nom* tee Arne **ea* Arne** ,....,
Yee A o•na t.A.so la *Alm
..e.a.r........6...".....
....ea AP Inseam Pty. Av. 11. EE noncom A vs. ...AP
mere*el At* mince me*Ae, a • mono e*Deon nes AA* as A*
*. al nie rale el en*. ens Am* . enerine de■ de.* .
wit.,•.k..e.....1•...............,,,,,„..,,,,,„
1,...r......
1
as*.
Cam*
' P.... A. A...a wn• paw NA..
Pap, • al D.
Appendix ifi
Additional Benefits Information
South Tahoe Pubic Utility District
September 2008
9-5-08 APPENDI55 A eldrt•dt* Benefits Infon•nabon
,.. wtAS
ve'n Wa �.ffi.d
x.a.... m.m.v a saga 5,..5.
�v,.ay<M, knew mw deny Ewan
a.
Web, woe ..e
e.. EE a dWore VW n am. a 9
a w e.n me..oarm.M ru.ma.erl
rr� rrwenr e saaev.ent Ma.. �nt1' a
swaa }''- A tr,
.ma.s.e...n- en.nr...•mm m.m... man
CL.Y,.b
- z`uwi'i' .._:_
r...ae.. sx Ed ...web an.. o.am.im.oamew
',et se*
.. caw s. m mw....a.o.a.. w.
a xwwaw vt[ xowinti.m. E.rae. vwv. n4 .ns...m W Wan mamer ca am Ms
Se /A a Enc.va Am. Se
I ..:.e.i.c.eep.r WPM rvm.+m C.nka
A�ae"9 aa4a Poea<GmGVa aaAlas5r+m..t
Mu,. AWAY. Y. awlS AV
m w.r au. w ruv�9..mmvvurane
: b '�±tn @^4: '3v <
Tee GM mon sm... aa anem n.. Ye* M+ar (.1.1.• oere.nen new
os m •e nn+wtnwwi..N a. .1,..........• 4
MwmnvM.n da
¢n. aaaw,a.a
r z I � 1
w.Fmm EE* Ma..an.u..rm.em..w.a
f�rt.•a.�m.+...ex.w M�men:s..r.n.ws, a.ei e..e
�YH�w�+.o-rr..n�Y wFM++n w V•r+n.Itle Pane L.
o+e�.ima.Onm1. EE UhrA.br�vlrwlti nIDean• FE
p
ar W.4.1.0
aW.a.e case wT.wma am...YS.
Norm ieMe Cu Mc tl It Drshid
'rNw
,..,.r a... FE.. wemw..r mm.a a. aa.
w .mve..r. M...ma.ar.mn..r.m am mum..
a
rrFE... a.nerem..mmma . owe.nnmwmma.a. en... w..a,m.
�+m.q r + I FF el wmp I.
eyesores. .r m r.
• re e e .rrw sm.
Santa Mrpar.MWarr Rgencs
x..
aaaa ma. w..eaw.vmew. amnrwma.00.
wr...
Mamma eWm • .s..a. [.same wr wNa.a
[.amen aara.im.em. Cy... c^•m'wsv.•Aam
.
m EEim a.wg ..
a 4+ ur.a m con Ake • m..a was oeww. arm. rem* an
Am........ Am........ a.u4rEN�.e0...,0„...a.>vaswh.n
nrrAM W.o.'KYa1m u.
aw...axoe a r ...
""'."."."."'"''''''''''''...'''''''`'°"`" m a
w.ma... ..1. M a
�Fl u* "Fry.n w aan.OMme.amrr.m. ofFeetytly
Fad EF oma..amroMwra a.ewr
A.+ > sw.rT t o em. Dm. Tier...
� Oe°'Wr'°
Tema Scy n unn.mlaY Dien
..wro.N r r�i o a0'nem o EE WEN rmoro.ow M]R
..nswr,
MEEI i5Y
mr M«e..gMS rsnna..w
Wwra..mw rro.awams,.,.aai,e % .,a„�w yF aamu .am. m.
o
.a. wea.my. n. a a.m.e... There es n.m aw
T
x..
M Ed sneniAr �.. 0.a.J mfsbw a emm..wa...am.a..yn
m .mnn an m. oa.s.aw .. F1'sv mw. cn.
c.a. Wm. maw war.. nen*..s Ir.saernmea...
Mx.....p l a n W n e.ro o.s..ew ra¢ waam�o.
n...+wan,. e.sm rm.... ms mom., am - we
sera.....waw.aaa...
rm. Pae
.wen. am m mmeamoyam
..noe.Trvckre San Mr! Agency
aim R...mm ma Am. yam,. m.e.w am. uses..[w.e..m m....
xo+.
.mm.e.
pat 5.. of meet lex own ton. Li pen rammed. 1.11 a arum
sev.
Fr.a.atnca....asam. m. ra.r.a..anma um.hm.
oabM u.a r
k. m..mo...... .mpa a. m.a.o.v es. rFgrr4r
�.vr atoms m.maE�� E
�
irr..a.a.su armor rwar e .. .am. FE
[man wea.rmuewnrnaemm.a.r.a memraw
...mot Sa�Rx�'J sficl
Al
yr pn ri sawn are warm mar kr mows ✓s.rre ... r.+a..a. unto-
19 Ism
the ma el 1 ym elm. EE x a...EN tonal actlyenee awn.
my Yams a mann *ma* man
end of
ws.ma uMa.s me E:.ra..............mm .sua.
....we rudenarfa.se.EE w wssmn.u.rec.
mudov.br.r.F5 %m.m.s bms.w. el........
...°.....................''..r....
em
wit pg.. u.r. ........ .sra.Mi
w e
Evw
Mn.a�FE asa.e amewera..maana
Il Ina m w.s.P+.M nauarrr ears a.e
Appendix III
Additional Benefits Information
South Tahoe Pubic Utility District
September 2008
Page 2 d2
9508 APPENDIX V My/krona! Beneks It w..wtw.