Resolution 2205
RESOLUTION NO. 2205
A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT RE COMMITMENT FOR
MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN THE
MITIGATION PROGRAM PROPOSED WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITIES.
WHEREAS, the South Tahoe Public Utility District
operates a thirteen year old advanced wastewater treatment
plant in need of modification, rehabilitation, and expan-
sion of capacity; and
WHEREAS, there is documentation of severe water
quality problems at Indian Creek Reservoir where the treat-
ed wastewater is stored; and
WHEREAS, the District completed a Facility Plan
Report in June 1978 in which the recommended project includ-
ed: expansion of the wastewater treatment plant to a 10 mgd
capacity, reduction in level of wastewater treatment,
r construction of a new reservoir in Alpine County for seasonal
storage of treated wastewater, modification to the land
application system, and maintenance of Indian Creek Reservoir
with Carson River waters;and
WHEREAS, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
completed in October 1979 a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement on the South Tahoe and Douglas County Sewer plant
expansion proposals. Said Draft Report included 134 mitigation
measures to be implemented by 92 groups and agencies; and
Whereas, the Bi State Compact approved by the
Legislatures of California and Nevada, and ratified by the
U. S. Congress,; restricts the expansion of the sewer plant
capacity until after April 1983; and
WHEREAS, the Utility District has amended its
Facility Plan to reflect a 7.5 mgd project with no increase
beyond the existing allowable sewer connections; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Task Force has developed
a Mitigation program for the proposed wastewater treatment
facilities in response to the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement prepared by the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Task Force has identified
fifteen (15) mitigation measures for which the Utility District
has some responsibility for implementation.
-1-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the SOUTH TAHOE
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT does make a commitment to proceed
with the goals and timetable of the mitigation program as
presented in the November 1980 Mitigation Task Force Report.
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT commits to the following specific mitigation
measures:
EROSION AND DRAINAGE PROJECTS
Measure #8 Best Management Practices
(Measure Implemented)
The South Tahoe Public Utility District does make a
commitment to implement best management practices for erosion
and sediment control. Presented in Attachment "A" is the scope
of work for the 1981 contract between the Utility District and
the U.S. Soil Conservation Service for development of erosion
control plans for District's facilities. A budget authoriza-
tion of $30,000 is committed to the SCS Contract. The SOUTH
TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT was named by the Tahoe Resources
Conservation District as the "Outstanding Cooperator of the
Year" for 1980. (Attachment "D")
DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS.....
Measure #12. Construction is Prohibited Unless
Offset by Remedial Projects
(Measure Supported)
The South Tahoe Public Utility District supports the efforts
by the California Water Resources Control Board to implement
remedial erosion control projects. The Utility District has
submitted to the Lahontan Board five erosion control projects
for inclusion on the 1980-81 grant priority list. The Heavenly
Valley Water Tank and Cold Creek Watershed projects received an
"A" priority by the Lahontan Board. The Utility District does
commit to the implementation of these two projects. The Utility
District will make its best effort to implement the other three
projects not assigned grant funding priority.
TRANSPORTATION MEASURES.....
Measure #33. Staggered Work and/or Operations
Hours
(Measure Implemented)
Sewer plant operators are on a 12-hour shift basis. Water
and sewer maintenance personnel are on 10-hour shift basis. This
action reduces the number of employees trips per week.
Measure #43. Priority Treatment for Carpools
(Measure Implemented)
Because of the 10 hour, 12 hour, and 8 hour shift schedules,
it is difficult to arrange carpools. (Operators change shifts
at 4:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.)
The District will work with other agencies in implementing
carpool programs.
LAND USE AND HOUSING
Measure #67. Implement Neighborhood Facilities,
Services, and Amenities to Encourage
Private-Sector Investment
(Measure Implemented)
District has developed Facility Plan for sewer system and
Master Plan for water system to improve utility service.
Wastewater Facility Plan requires immediate modification of
sewer plant to increase plant reliability. Capacity expansion is
dependent upon the allowable growth identified in the TRPA studies.
Water System improvements are prioritied and scheduled in the
1979 Master Paln. Expansion of water supply is to be implemented
upon need and is, therefore, subject to land use planning determina-
tions on allowable growth.
Measure #70. Coordinate Regional Land Use
Policies, Coordinate Local,
Regional, State and Federal
Land Use Planning Efforts
(Measure Implemented)
Facility Plan for sewer system, and Master Plan for water
system developed to accomplish necessary coordination.
A Memorandum of Understanding between the County of E1 Dorado,
City of South Lake Tahoe and the Utility District was executed in
February 1980 to provide for coordination of planning efforts. The
Mitigation Task Force has developed a detailed program for the
implementation of coordinated planning programs and mitigation
measures.
PUBLIC SERVICES/FISCAL CONCERNS
Measure #77. Ensure that New Development
Locates to Maximum Advantage of
Existing Service Capabilities
(Measure Implemented)
See comment on Measure #70.
Measure #78. Coordinate Regional Land Use
Planning and Capital Facilities
Planning and Budgeting
(Measure Implemented)
See comment on Measure #70.
Measure #79. Require Developers to Provide
Infrastructure and Major Service
Facilities and to Contribute
Funds for Such Improvements
(Measure Implemented)
The Utility District requires
through Sewer Ordinance No.300
a sewer connection fee of $580
per sewer unit ($1740 per single
family resident 3 sewer units).
The Board of Directors will consider
in February of 1981 amendment of sewer
-3-
Ordinance No. 300 to increase
the connection charges.
Water Service Ordinances Nos.
313. and 312 establish a
connection charge for water
service.
Measure #80. Consolidate Service Districts
(Partial Implementation)
A South Shore Water Purveyors Joint Powers Agreement is
being developed to coordinate water service planning, conserva-
tion programs.
UTILITIES
Measure #35. Institute Water Conservation
Programs to Reduce Water
Conservation
Measure #86. Install Retrofit Water Conser-
vation Devices
Measure #87. Enforce Mandatory Water Conser-
vation Efforts
(Partially Implemented)
The Utility District and South Shore Water Purveyors do
distribute, at no cost, water conservation kits.
The Utility District, in cooperation with the South Shore
Water Purveyors, will investigate and report on the feasibility
of implementation of these proposed water conservation programs.
An outline of the investigation is presented in Attachment "B".
The District will complete the report by July 1, 1981. A program
for water conservation will be implemented by December 1981.
Measure #96. Monitor Groundwater and Irrigated
Runoff to Ensure that Land Applica-
tion of Secondary Effluent is not
Detrimental to Surface and Ground-
water Quality
(Measure Implemented)
Presented in Attachment "C" is the Alpine County Monitoring
Program approved by the Utility District Board of Directors at its
December 18, 1980 meeting. A new waste discharge permit for the
land application program will be obtained from the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region. A monitor-
ing program will be a part of the permit requirements.
Measure #97. Maintain Reliable Treatment to
Ensure Public Health Protection
Against Potential Hazards from
Using Secondary Effluent for
Irrigation
(Measure Implemented)
-a-
The District does make a commitment to maintain the sewage
treatment and land application sy to Z'NEAL" ure public health
protection.
TER OL ,--PRESIDENT
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
ATTEST:
L 11 4Suth y D. b ose, C erk of Board
hoe Public Utility District
ATTACHMENT "A"
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
SCOPE OF WORK 1981 CONTRACT
U.S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
(Approved by Board of Directors 12/18/80)
UNITED STATES EPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE P.O. Box 10529 So. Lake Tahoe, CA 95731
December 11, 1980
r
Jim Cofer, General Manager
South Tahoe Public Utility District
P.O. Box AU
So. Lake Tahoe, CA 95705
RE: 1981 Contract Agreement
-
Dear Jim:
After review of your letter dated December 5, 1980, and discussion
with Bob Baer, we feel 180 man-days would be required to complete the
projects outlined. This includes follow-up on the Alpine County study.
Due to increases in salaries, cost of living, overhead, and energy
costs, the hourly rate is changed from $17.00/hr. to $20.00/hr. We esti-
mate the 1981 agreement should be in the amount of $30,000.00; this in-
cludes the balance of $7,381.01 remaining from the 1980 agreement.
If you agree with these figures, please sign the extension agree-
kiw and attach this letter and a list of the projects you wish to
have completed for 1981. Please send the signed extension to this of-
fice.
If you have any questions, please contact Mark Parson or myself.
Sincer
t
R i cha y.l.e
District Conservationist
cc: Ray Borchard, A.C., SCS Sacramento
v
WORK DISTRIBUTION
man-days
Project Items Soil Conservationist
1. Headstart, Phase 1 7
2. Headstart, Phase II 10
3. Water Storage Tanks 7
4. Erosion Control Grants 20
5. Pipeline Replacement 10
6. College Well 5
7. Conservation Plans 60
(surface runoff control measures)
8. Conservation Plan 10
(SEZ work)
9. General Consultation 51*
Total 180 man-days
PERSONNEL:
180 man-days x 8 hr/day x $20.00/hr.* $28,800.00
Travel: 20 days @$60.00/day 1,200.00
Total estimated cost - 30,000.00
'Includes time for follow-up on the Alpine County study.
**Increase from $17.00 to $20.00 due to salary increases (9.10), cost of
living and general increase in overhead and administrative costs'.
kw
P1 !'A J
w SOUTH TAHOE FL;RLIC UTILITY D:SIRICT ;,'Ea aCAI ~N
t S•.. rr .1950 N.IH -----A PLJRI IC AGENCY - --DIRECIORS
P O Lao. AU Sown Lake Tahoe California 95705 Phone (916) 544-6474 W.4ES R JONES
IORRENEKASHUBA
1275 1•!t adow Cr( S1 Drive MICKEY MADDEN
December 5, 1980 JOHN WYNN
Mr. Richard Pyle
USDA
Soil Conservation Service
P. O. Box 10529
So. Lake Tahoe, CA 95731
Subject: 1981 Contract with SCS
Dear Dick:
The Utility District would like to meet with you, and representa-
tives from your agency, to discuss your participation in the
District's procrams during 1981. Some specific areas where the
District is interested in assistance by the Soil Conservation
Service is presented in the following paragraphs.
1. Headstart Plant Improvements, Phase I
SCS developed a conservation plan for the project wbich,was
included in the contract documents. We would like the SCS to
make on-site inspections to assist the resident engineer in
seeing that the conservation plan is carried out. 1,e anticipate
these inspections would be made twice per month from May through
November.
2. Headstart Plant Improvements, Phase II
Phase II of the Headstart program is the addition of approxi-
mately 4,000 square feet to the administration building, a new
entrance to the plant and additional parking area. The site plan
for the project is ready for SCS input. Vle would like SCS to
develop a conservation plan for the project to be included in the
contract documents.
3. Water Storage Tanks
SCS developed a conservation plan for the project which was
included in the contract documents. We would like SCS to make
on-site inspections of the project. We anticipate these inspec-
tions could be made twice per month from May through November.
4. Assistance on Erosion Control Grants
The District has applied to the State Water Resources Con-
~Aw Board for design and construction funds for several projects.
' e cr,:Int ::pplic• on ~,•as taFed 'on ccnserv ~pn plz:ns d,_ve]oped
by SCS for the foTlcwing projects: III
(a) Cold Creek 1--atershed
(b) ;,irT--)ort Well
(c) Upper Truckee Pump Station Access Road
(d) Heavenly Valley 1•:ater Storage Tanks
The District would like for SCS to assist the District with the
following tasks:
(a) Help select consultant to prepare contract drawings;
(b) Provide technical assistant to consultant;
(c) Review contract documents for the District;
(d) Assist the District in obtaining agency approval;
(e) Provide on-site inspection of the construction.
5. Water Pipeline Replaccanent
The District plans on replacing several old domestic water-
lines. The lines are located in existing paved streets and
meadow areas. Ile would like SCS to develop a conservation plan
to be enclosed in the contract documents and to perform on-site
inspections.
6. College Well
The District plans to develop a new domestic water well on
the new community college site. Ile would like SCS to develop
a conservation plan to be included in the contract documents
iW and to perform on-site inspections.
s
7. On-Site Surface Runoff Control Measures
The 208 I-;ater Quality Plan requires the development of con-
trol measures to prevent runoff from areas with on-site surface
runoff control problems. The SCS would assist the Utility Dis-
trict in the development of on-site surface runoff control plans
for each of the District's facilities. The facilities to be
considered for control plans are as follows:
Sewer System Water System
Treatment Plant Tata Lane 1-7ells & Storage
Luther Pass Pump Station Helen Avenue I-Jells
Camp Richard Pump Station Chris Avenue Well
Pope Beach Pump Station Trout Creek Boosters
Tallac Village Pump Station Fountain Avenue Complex
Venice Beach Pump Station Martin Avenue Well
St. 1,"oritz Pump Station Glenwood I•01ells
Tahoe Keys Pump Station Blackrock Wells
Bellevue Pump Station Pine Avenue Well
Al Tahoe Pump Station Glen Road Booster
Beecher Pump Station Stateline Reservoir
Upper Truckee Pump Station Keller Booster
Stateline Pump Station Heavenly Valley Tanks
Bijou Pump Station alph Drive I-;ells & Tanks
Johnson Pump Station Black Bart Booster
Pioneer Village Pump Station Cold Creek Filter Plant
Emergency Holding Pond
'r. Rich-
8. Pyle -3- c~rr.er S, 1980
8. Conservation Plan for 1•7aintenance Projects in ~ ,
Fnvircni-, ntall y Fensi tive Areas
The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency has requested the District
to prepare a conservation plan for maintenance projects in en-
vironmentally sensitive areas. t,;e would like SCS to assist the
District in developing a conservation plan.
9. General Consultation
lie would like to develop a budget for use on miscellaneous
projects. 1-~'e believe ten days for water division projects and
twenty days for sewer division projects should be adequate.
Table I shows the anticipated level of effort required for
SCS programs at the South Tahoe Public Utility District.
If you have any questions concerning these projects, please
feel free to contact me. The District looks forward to working
with SCS on these projects in 1981.
Very truly yours,
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Robert G. Baer
Assistant District Engineer
~Aw RGB:evn
cc: Ruth Heng
tar
~r
• TABLE I
L A!;TICIPATED LEVEL OF EFFORT
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE PROGR.7VIS
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Program 1;an Days
1. Headstart Plant Improvements, Phase I 7
2. Headstart Plant Improvements, Phase II 10
3. 1•7ater Storage Tanks 7 ,
4. Assistance on Erosion Control Grant Projects 20
5. Water Pipeline Replacement 10
6. Collete Well. Project 5
7. On-Site Surface Runoff Control Measures 60
8. Conservation Plans for Mlaintenance Projects 10
9. General Consultation 30
TOTAL 159 Man Days
~w
GB:evn
2-5-80 '
UNITED STATES'DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTU4 i~f ~11
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE P.O. Box 10529 So. Lake Tahoe, CA 95731
December 8, 1980
~c C 7cj
Mr. J i m Cofer, General Manager S.T,p U r),
South Tahoe Public Utility District
P.O. Box AU
So. Lake Tahoe, CA 95731
RE: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for Work in S.E.Z.'s
Dear Jim:
On December 2, Mark Parson met with Bob Baer and Ruthie Heng to
discuss control of erosion and sediment from your projects located in
stream environment zones (S.E.Z.'s). Your staff requested comments
for development of such a plan from SCS.
Regarding repair and maintenance work in S.E.Z.'s, SCS staff re-
cognizes two potential situations which could arise; however, both can
use similar courses of action.
1. Emeraencv Repair Work (i.e., export line rupture)
A. Winter conditions (maximum water influence)
B. Summer conditions (minimum water influence)
II. Routine Maintenance Work (i.e., pipe cleanout & inspection -
usually summer conditions)
Last April, we reviewed your Master Contingency Plan Draft which in-
cluded provisions for controlling erosion and sediment during flood events,
spills, and pond or tank failure. This section could be expanded and re-
vised to include procedures for emergency repair and maintenance work in
S.E.Z.'s. See the attached Plan of Action. Notice that items 1 through
6 (or similar development) must be completed before item 7 (permission) is
obtained to proceed with repair work. For some emergencies, would it be
feasible to "skip" the permit or permission process and complete the repairs
as soon as possible with agency review at a later time?
If you have any questions regarding these recommendations, please
contact Mark Parson of our office.
Sin er 1 ,
Ri and C. le
District Conservationist
Attachment
PLAN OF ACTION FOR WORK IN S.E.Z.'s
1. If possible, stop operation of facility requiring repair.
2. Notify appropriate staff and agencies.
3. Determine extent of damage and necessary repairs.
4. Determine feasibility and best method and route of access; if access can be
made without S.E.Z. disturbance, make detailed site inspection and update
#/3 above. Routes of access for maintenance and emergencies should be pre-
determined.
5. Determine temporary erosion and sediment control measures needed to gain
access or complete repairs.
Needed practices might include:
a. Temporary sediment barriers (straw bales, filter fabric, etc.)
b. Temporary diversions (dikes, culverts, dams, etc.)
C. Temporary soil stabilization (mulches, netting, etc.)
d. Minimize disturbance (temporary fencing, site boundaries, etc.)
e. Properly dispose of cleared vegetation and earthen material
f. Other measures as needed
These temporary measures may have to be left in place until such time when
conditions allow the installation of permanent measures. District staff
should be familiar with proper installation methods of needed practices.
6. Determine permanent erosion and sediment control measures needed-to restore
the project area to original condition or better. Determine proper time of
installation (some permanent measures may have to be installed during better
weather conditions or lower water levels). Permanent measures should be
properly designed and installed to ensure longevity.
Needed practices might include:
a. Regrading of cuts and fills to a 2:1 (50%) slope or less; soil movement
and fills should be minimized.
b. Runoff and stream flows should be returned to the natural flow line.
Runoff control measures such as diversions, subsurface drainage, dams,
interceptor trenches, culverts and other water conveyance structures should
be kept to a minimum.
C. Permanent slope stabilization measures such as retaining walls, grading,
and other structures should be kept to a minimum unless needed to prevent
future damage to improvements or the natural integrity of the S.E.Z.
d. Permanent vegetative cover should be established for those areas disturbed;
vegetation should be replaced with species the same or similar to that
removed. Fertilizers and certain soil amendments such as manure should
not be used in S.E.Z.'s.
~Aw
7. Submit plans and obtain permission or necessary permits and variances
r to proceed; revise as necessary to meet requirements.
~W 8. Implement plan:
a. Install temporary measures;
b. Make needed repairs;
c. Weather and site conditions permitting, install permanent stabilization
measures.
9. Inspection and follow-up: Periodic inspections should be made to make sure
temporary and/or permanent measures are operating efficiently. Regular
maintenance may be needed on some measures such as sediment debris basins.
Some measures may have to be replaced or repaired.
This Plan of Action can be used as a general guide as you develop your own
specific erosion control program. It will be impossible to address which
practices will be required without inspection of each site and potential
problem. TRPA's Handbook of Best Management Practices can be used as a guide
for determining which conservation practices should be used.
SCS staff is available to assist with the development of specific conservation
plans when work is necessary in stream environment zones. SCS can also offer
solutions to problems not in the BMP Handbook, such as what was recommended
for repair work in Ledbetter's meadow. Recommendations for revegetation are
also available. ;
In addition to the above Plan of Action, STPUD should have stockpiled
IiAwtemporary erosion and sediment control material (i.e., filter fabric fence)
for use during emergencies. This saves time by not having to order the pro-
ducts and, if installed immediately, would help prevent extensive damage to
resources. At a minimum, SCS suggest the following total be distributed and
stockpiled at strategic locations within STPUD boundaries:
i
Straw bales (100 lb. bales) - 60-80 bales j
Filter fabric fence (4 ft. wide) - 3 - 100 ft. roles
Jute netting (or similar - 4 ft. wide) - 5 - 100 ft. roles
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true
and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a regular
meeting of the Board of Directors of the SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT on the 15th day of JANUARY , 1981,
by the following votes:
AYES: Directors Olson, Kashuba, Wynn, Jones, Madden
NOES: Directors: None
ABSENT: Directors: None
r
i
, CLERK OF RD
MA D. OEP
TILITY DISTRICT
SOUTH TABLIC U