Loading...
AP 02-17-11 kit ca0 A 00 1,40 .STILITY 01- SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA Thursday, February 17, 2011 2:00 P.M. District Board Room 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, California Richard Solbrig, General Manager Paul Sciuto, Assistant General Manager Dale Rise, President BOARD MEMBERS Mary Lou Mosbacher, Vice President James R. Jones, Director Eric W.Schafer, Director Chris Cefalu, Director 1. ALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING—PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board on short non-agenda items that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the District. Five minute limit. No action can be taken on matters not listed on the agenda.) 3. CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR 4. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR (Any item can be removed to be discussed and considered separately upon request. Comments and questions from members of the public,staff or Board can be taken when the comment does not necessitate separate action.) 5. CONSENT ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION /ACTION 6. PRESENTATION a. The Aspens at South Lake Tahoe Proposed Low Income Housing Project (Shellan Rodriguez, Pacific West Communities; Eugene Palazzo, City Redevelopment Director) 7. ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION REQUESTED BOARD ACTION a. USDA Sewer Special Use Permit (1) Authorize Execution of a Cost Pg.73 (Paul Sciuto) Recovery Agreement with the USDA Forest Service for Processing the District's Special Use Permit Application; and (2) Authorize Payment of the Estimated Processing Fee in the Amount of$51,672.54 REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA-FEBRUARY 17, 2011 PAGE-2 b. Airport Well Evaluation Accept Proposal from the Selected Pg.85 (Ivo Bergsohn) Consultant to Provide Engineering, Well Rehabilitation and Well Profiling Services c. Payment of Claims Approve Payment in the Amount of Pg. 101 $1,252,214.37 8. BOARD MEMBER STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS (Discussions may take place;however, no action will be taken) a. Water& Wastewater Operations Committee (Jones / Rise) b. Finance Committee (Schafer/ Cefalu) c. Executive Committee (Rise / Mosbacher) d. Planning Committee (Mosbacher/Schafer) 9. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR REPRESENTATIVES REPORT 10. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (Discussions may take place;however, no action will be taken.) 11. GENERAL MANAGER REPORT(S) (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) a. Joint Utility Management Conference b. Legal Service Provider Comparisons 12. STAFF /ATTORNEY REPORT(S) (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) a. Board Travel Policy (Kathy Sharp) 13. NOTICE OF PAST AND FUTURE MEETINGS/ EVENTS Past Meetings / Events 02/09/11 -El Dorado County Water Agency Board Meeting 02/14/11 -Water and Wastewater Operations Committee Meeting 02/16/11 -ECC (Employee Communications Committee) Meeting Future Meetings/ Events 02/18/11 -8:30 a.m.- Finance Committee Meeting at District 02/21/11 -Presidents' Day (District Office Closed) 02/23/11 -8:00 a.m.- H.i.P. (Health Improvement Program) Guest Speaker at District 02/23/11 - 1:00 p.m.- Finance Committee Meeting at District 02/28/11 -03/04/11 -ACWA (Association of Water Agencies) Conference in Wa., D.C. 02/28/11 -3:30 p.m.-Water and Wastewater Operations Committee Meeting at District 03/01/11 -9:00 a.m.-Alpine County Supervisors Board Meeting in Markleeville 03/03/11 -2:00 p.m.-STPUD Regular Board Meeting at District 03/09/11 -2:00 p.m.- Board Budget Workshop at District 14. CLOSED SESSION (The Board will adjourn to Closed Session to discuss items identified below. Closed Session is not open to the public; however, an opportunity will be provided at this time if members of the public would like to comment on any item listed.Three minute limit.) a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel Pg. 121 Existing Litigation re: United States of America v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., et al., Civil Action No. 3:73-cv-00183-LDG, Subfile 3:73cv-00207-LDG, United States District Court for the District of Nevada REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA-FEBRUARY 17,2011 PAGE-3 b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel Pg. 123 Existing Litigation re: False Claims Act Case: United States, the States of California, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, and Tennessee and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia ex rel. John Hendrix v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A., Civil Action No. ED CV06-0055-GW, United States District Court for the Central District of California C. Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(c)/Conference with Legal Counsel Pg. 125 Anticipated Litigation: (One Case) d. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a)/Conference with Labor Pg. 127 Negotiators Agency Negotiators: Richard Solbrig/General Manager, Board of Directors Employee Organization: Stationary Engineers, Local 39 15. ACTION / REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION 16. ADJOURNMENT (To the next regular meeting, March 3, 2011, 2:00 p.m.) • The South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month.A complete agenda packet,including all backup information is available for review at the meeting and at the District office during the hours of 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday.A recording of the meeting is retained for 30 days after minutes of the meeting have been approved.Items on this agenda are numbered for identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the order in which they appear on the agenda.Designated times are for particular items only. Public Hearings will not be called to order prior to the time specified,but may occur slightly later than the specified time. Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the agenda will be taken at the same time the agenda items are heard;comments should be brief and directed to the specifics of the item being considered. Comments on items not on the agenda can be heard during"Comments from the Audience;"however,action cannot be taken on items not on the agenda. Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all written material presented at the meeting.Backup to any agenda item(s) not included with the Board packet will be made available when finalized at the District office,at the Board meeting,and upon request to the Clerk of the Board. The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities.Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate participation of the disabled in all of the District's public meetings.If particular accommodations for the disabled are needed(i.e.,disability-related aids,or other services),please contact the Clerk of the Board at 530.544.6474,extension 6203,at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. WY" 11 s 00 �rr • 1850 'VNst trilLrEY 01' CONSENT CALENDAR FEBRUARY 17, 2011 ITEMS REQUESTED ACTION a. Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Authorize Task Order to AECOM for Pg. 1 (John Thiel) Electrical, Instrumentation and Control Engineering Services, in the Amount Not to Exceed $32,500 b. Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Authorize Task Order to Hauge Pg.9 (John Thiel) Brueck Associates for CEQA and TRPA Permitting Assistance in the Amount Not to Exceed $25,000 c. 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project (1) Approve Change Order No. 4 to Pg. 17 (John Thiel) Campbell Construction Company, Inc., in the credit amount of <$32,954.55>; (2) Approve the Project Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims; and (3) Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk d. Echo View and Angora Tanks Replacement (1) Approve the Project Closeout Pg.27 (Julie Ryan) Agreement and Release of Claims for Resource Development Company; and (2) Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk e. Headworks Replacement: Phase 1 (1) Approve the Project Closeout Pg.35 (Julie Ryan) Agreement and Release of Claims for Evans Brothers, Inc., and (2) Authorize Staff to File a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk f. Sale of Surplus Generator Approve Sale of Surplus Generator to Pg.43 (Randy Curtis) Nevada Generator Systems, in the Amount of$3,500 CONSENT CALENDAR-FEBRUARY 17,2011 PAGE-2 g. Hydro Truck Bid Authorize Staff to Advertise for Bids Pg.45 (Randy Curtis) for a Sewer Cleaning Truck and Machine h. 2010 Legal Review of Front-End Specifications Approve Amendment to the Pg.53 (Paul Sciuto) Existing Contract with Best, Best, & Krieger LLP, in the Amount of $3,102.50 i. Union Memorandum of Understanding (1) Approve Letter of Understanding Pg.55 (Richard Solbrig, Nancy Hussmann) Extending the Union Contract One Year to June 20, 2012; and (2) Authorize Execution of Same j. Luther Pass Pump Station Standby Power (1) Approve Change Order No. 5 to Pg.59 Generation Sierra Nevada Construction, Inc., in (Ivo Bergsohn) the Amount of$5,526; and (2) Add Eighty-Eight (88) Calendar Days to the Contract Time k. Regular Board Meeting Minutes: Approve Minutes Pg.63 January 20, 2011 (Kathy Sharp) I. Regular Board Meeting Minutes: Approve Minutes Pg.69 February 3, 2011 (Kathy Sharp) South Tahoe Public Utility District• 1274 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474•Facsimile 530.541.0614•www.stpud.us General Manager Richard H.solbrig Diractors /__ 4a.> South Chits Cefalu Junes R.Jones . Public Utility District "a" Dale Rise Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•wwwstpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4a TO: Board of Directors FROM: John Thiel, Principal Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Grizzly Mountain Booster Station REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize Task Order to AECOM for electrical, instrumentation and control engineering services, in the amount not to exceed $32,500. DISCUSSION: The District is developing a new booster station, Grizzly Mountain Booster, for construction in 2011. This booster will pump water from the Twin Peaks Zone to the Flagpole Zone.The recently completed Twin Peaks Booster Station pumps water from the Stateline Zone to Twin Peaks.These two booster station projects were identified in the Flagpole-Combined System Reliability Improvement Plan completed by the District in October 2006, as the preferred alternative to provide redundancy to the Flagpole Booster and the old pipeline located under the Upper Truckee River. The new station will be constructed at 1553 Grizzly Mountain Drive on a lot recently purchased by the District and will include three booster pumps and a diesel-powered standby generator. The Grizzly Booster will be modeled after the North Apache Booster Station due to similar function, size, and because it is also located in a residential neighborhood. Project design and development of plans and specifications will be completed by the District's Engineering Department with consultant assistance in the structural, electrical, instrumentation and control disciplines. Because of available funding through the El Dorado County Water Agency, staff is planning to have the CEQA and TRPA permitting completed by an environmental services consultant. The attached proposal from AECOM describes the work and schedule for electrical, instrumentation and control engineering services. SCHEDULE: Complete plans by 3/29/11; Award Bid 5/05/11; NTP 5/19/11. COSTS: Not to Exceed $32,500 ACCOUNT NO: 2029-8176/GRIZBS BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $132,266 (2010/11); $1,100,000 (2011/12) ATTACHMENTS: Proposal from AECOM -1- Exhibit A January 26,2011 South Tahoe Public Utility District Grizzly Mountain Booster Pump Station Scope of Services (Alternative to Basic Scope) Scope of Work 1. Design Project Oversight a. Kevin Berryhill,PE,will serve as AECOM's Project Manager with the authority and responsibility to make project decisions,and monitor the progress of the work. b. Pars Topjian,PE,will serve as Electrical Engineer. • c. Gerardo Yniguez, PE,will serve as Instrumentation Engineer. 2. Project Coordination a. Coordinate with the District relative to the design aspects of the pump station that concern the electrical and instrumentation components. b. Coordinate with Electric Utility Company and prepare service request letter. c. Coordination will not require travel for AECOM's engineers during design or construction. 3. Project Design and Contract Documents a. Provide final design services acceptable to the District for the Electrical and Instrumentation disciplines. Drafting will be performed by AECOM's Cad operators. Design of all other disciplines will be handled by the District. b. Furnish the District with digital copies of the final project plans(AUTOCAD 2007 format)and specifications(MS Word format)via email. Final plans will be signed by,and stamped with, AECOM's signature and seal. Hard copies for such signature will be provided by the District. c. The District will prepare construction bidding contract documents including Notice to Contractors, General and Special Provisions, bid sheet,engineering drawings and technical specifications for all disciplines except for the electrical and instrumentation components which will prepared by AECOM and provided to the District. 4. Bidding Phase a. AECOM will answer RFIs in writing forwarded from the District from prospective bidders relative to the electrical and instrumentation components. b. AECOM has not budgeted for producing adenda to the documents after contract award. 5. Construction Phase Services a. AECOM will review and respond in writing to contractor electrical and l&C questions as forwarded from the District. Page 1 of 4 -3- Exhibit A January 26,2011 2. Contractor Indemnification/Insurance CLIENT will include in the general conditions of any construction contract, language which states that the construction contractor is required to hold harmless and defend the District,AECOM, and their agents,employees and consultants,from all suits and actions, including attorneys'fees, and all costs of litigation and judgments of any nature and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed thereunder.The District,AECOM,their agents,employees and consultants shall also be named as additional insureds in any construction contractor's insurance policies. 3. Reuse of Documents/CADD Data Documents,drawings,specifications, and electronic information/data, including computer aided drafting and design("CADD"),prepared by AECOM pursuant to this agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by CLIENT or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project.Any use of completed documents for other projects and any use of incomplete documents without specific written authorization from AECOM will be at the District's sole risk and without liability to AECOM.The District assumes full responsibility for such changes unless the District has given AECOM prior notice and has received from AECOM written consent for such changes. Electronic data delivered to the District will not include the professional stamp or signature of an engineer or architect.The District agrees that AECOM shall not be liable for claims,liabilities or losses arising out of,or connected with the decline of accuracy or readability of electronic data due to inappropriate storage conditions or duration. 4. Information to be Provided by the District a. Cad drawings of other disciplines to be used as base plans. Drawings will be Autocad 2007. b. Electronic copies of all Addenda in Word, issued for Apache Pump Station for incorporation. 5. Delay AECOM will not be responsible for delays due to causes beyond AECOM's reasonable control. In the case of any such delay,the time of completion will be extended accordingly. In the event that AECOM's services hereunder are delayed by the District or others for a period in excess of six(6) months,AECOM's compensation shall be subject to renegotiation. 6. Construction Means, Methods, and Safety a. AECOM shall have no responsibility, control over or charge of construction means, methods, techniques,sequences or procedures, as these are solely the responsibility of the construction contractor. AECOM shall not have the authority to stop or reject the work of the construction contractor. b. Throughout the course of the project,the construction contractor shall be solely responsible for all jobsite conditions, including the safety of all persons and property. AECOM shall have no responsibility for construction site safety. 7. Compensation AECOM will invoice the District monthly for the work performed during the prior month in accordance with AECOM's current Hourly Rate Schedule shown in the attached Project Budget. The total fee amount for Basic Services shall not exceed$32,499 without further authorization by the District(see Page3 of 4 ACM -5- TO: John Thiel-STPUD DATE: 1/26/2011 FROM: Pars Topjian-AECOM JOB NO: FSIJECT:PROJECT BUDGET(ELECTRICAL AND INSTRUMENTATON) e~ ERT:STPUD , ' Par#i:GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN PUMP STATION-ALTERNATE PROPOSAL $ T W N CLASSIFICATIONS: a 8 5 v �`a K E i-o: w i t I II 11 'Ail g RATES(14. $210 0 $130 $95 $83 $7'8 TA K . DESCRIPTION MANHOURS 1.0 MANAGEMENT PROJ.ADMINISTRATION 2 8 4 1 8 $2,884 $121 $3,005 $o $0 $0 TOTAL: 1.0 EMENT 2 8 4 0 0 8 $2,884 $121 $0 $3,005 2.0 ELECTRICAL 2.1 Preparation of Dings 24 16 $6,560 $361 $6,921 2.2 Preparation of Specifications 8 $1,680 $92 $1,772 2.3 Quality Control 4 $640 $46 $886 2.4 Coordination with District" 4 $840 $22 $862 2.5 Coordination with Utility Co. 4 $840 $22 $862 2.5 Cost Estimate $0 $0 $0 - $0 2.e ELECTRICAL 44 0 0 16 0 0' $10,760 $543 $0 $11,303 3.0 INSTRUMENTATION 3.1 Preparation of Drawings 24 16 $4,640 $255 $4,895 3.2 Preparation of Specifications 12 $1,560 $86 $1,646 3.3 Quality Conte 4 $840 $46 $886 3.4 Coordination 8 $1,040 $57 $1,097 3,5 Cost Estimate $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 *WA::3.0 INSTRUMENTATION - _ 4 0 44 16 .0 01 $8,080 $444 $0 $8,524 4.0 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 4.1 Elec-PreBid Questions 4 $840 $46 $8661 4.2 Elec-RFIs 6 $1,260 $O) $1,260 4.3 Elec-Submittal Reviews 16 $3,360 $0 $3,360 4.4 Elec-Startup/Punch List(1 trip) Vr $0 $0 $01 4.5 IBC-PreBid Questions 4 $520 $01 4.6 18,C-RFIs 4 $520 $07 $520 4.7 IBC-Submittal Reviews(3) 24 $3,120 $0 $3,120 4.8 IBC-Startup/Punch List(1 trip) $0 $o $d so so/ so 1#4!1{.: 4ocoo*RocTloN su1PtJRT __- . 0 32 0. 0 0` $9,820 $46 $0 $9,666 OPTIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Peer Review of Other Disciplines $0 $0 $0 TOFAti:_OFMONA-S Es 0 0 0. 0., _ 4 $o s0 $S $o GRAND T-O At. 8 .O` , ' $31,344 $1,155 fit- $32,499 BASIS OF ESTIMATE . ATTACHED SCOPE OF WORK. -7- General Manager Richard H.SolbrIg aractore _ . South Chris Cefalu . .>(- .. ----. fJames R.Jones Public UtilityDistrict . ` ''L°"hioebacherDale Rise Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4b TO: Board of Directors FROM: John Thiel, Principal Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM -PROJECT NAME: Grizzly Mountain Booster Station REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize Task Order to Hauge Brueck Associates for CEQA and TRPA permitting assistance in the amount not to exceed $25,000. DISCUSSION: The District is planning to design and construct a new booster station, Grizzly Mountain Booster, for construction in May 2011. As discussed in the previous agenda item, project design and the development of plans and specifications will be completed by our Engineering Department with consultant assistance in the structural, electrical, instrumentation and control disciplines. Because of available funding through the El Dorado County Water Agency, staff is proposing that the CEQA and TRPA permitting be completed by an environmental services consultant. The attached proposal from Hauge Brueck Associates describes the work and schedule for the environmental documentation services. SCHEDULE: Complete plans by 3/29/11; Award Bid 5/05/11; NTP 5/19/11. COSTS: Not to Exceed$25,000 ACCOUNT NO: 2029-8176/GRIZBS BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $132,266 (2010/11); $1,100,000 (2011/12) ATTACHMENTS: Proposal from Hauge Brueck Associates CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES__________ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO -9- NAUGE BRUECK ASSOCIATES www.haugebrueck.com CALIFORNIA P 918-283-5800 F 918-313-3445 2233 Watt Avenue,Suite 295 Sacramento,CA 95825 January 31,2011 NEVADA P 775-588-4700 F 775.588-4704 P.O.Box 10291 310 Darla Court,Suite 209 Mr. John Thiel Zephyr Cove,NV 89448 South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150 RE: Grizzly Mountain Booster Station, CEQA and TRPA Environmental Documentation Dear Mr.Thiel: Hauge Brueck Associates (HBA) appreciates the opportunity to support the District's environmental and permitting requirements for the Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Project. As requested, HBA has prepared a scope of work and estimated budget for the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act. (CEQA) and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) environmental documentation/permitting for this project. In order to prepare the scope of work provided below,the following assumptions are used: • An Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/Neg Dec) will be the appropriate CEQA document; • The IS/Neg Dec will be prepared using plans available from District staff at the time of notice to proceed; • The project will be located within a District-owned parcel in a residential neighborhood which includes public service facilities as an allowed use; • For scheduling purposes, it is assumed that TRPA land capability verification field visits will not be required (e.g., because of presence of snow on the ground); • • The content and analysis included in the IS/Neg Dec may need to be supplemented for use as a TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist; • The District will handle permitting with agencies other than TRPA (e.g., Lahontan); • The District will pay permit filing and other fees required by agencies; • The District will prepare site plans and other project mapping in suitable format for use in the IS/Neg Dec; and -11- Mr.John Thiel January 31,2011 Page 3 approval under CEQA. HBA will also coordinate with the Clerks office concerning the District's submittal of CDFG wildlife impact fees. Task 4—TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist Upon the District's completion of detailed plans (e.g., 50% plans) for the Project, HBA will coordinate with TRPA staff to prepare the TRPA public service permit application and supporting TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist (IEC). HBA will prepare a draft IEC for TRPA staff review using the content of the Draft IS/Neg Dec. Following TRPA review of the application and draft IEC, HBA will respond to TRPA questions for finalization of the TRPA staff summary for project approval. If necessary based on project scheduling needs, HBA will prepare the IEC concurrent with the IS/Neg Dec (or use a format acceptable to both lead agencies)and submit to TRPA for processing during IS/Neg Dec circulation. Schedule Assuming project plans are adequate for completion of the IS/Neg Dec, Tasks 1 and 2 (including 30 day public circulation of the IS/Neg Dec)will be completed within 10 weeks of authorization by the District. This schedule assumes that the District will provide HBA with project base mapping and a general definition of the proposed action upon project initiation, that no special status biological or cultural resources surveys will be required, and that the IS/Neg Dec will begin circulation approximately 5-6 weeks after authorization to proceed. Assuming no significant impacts or issues are identified during circulation of the IS/Neg Dec, Task 3 will be completed in approximately 2 weeks following completion of the IS/Neg Dec circulation period. The Task 4 schedule will be dependent on TRPA staff availability and review schedules,but may be completed concurrent with CEQA tasks. -13 Mr.John Thiel January 31,2011 Page 5 IaAUGE BRUECK ASSOCIATES 2011 RATE SCHEDULE CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE ASSOCIATE I $50 ASSOCIATE II $55 AssocIATE III $65 ASSOCIATE IV $80 ASSOCIATE V $95 AssoCIATE VI $105 ASSOCIATE VII $115 ASSOCIATE VIII $130 • ASSOCIATE IX $160 ASSOCIATE X $180 ASSOCIATE XI $205 Hourly billing rates include labor and overhead(e.g.,office space,office supplies,computers,phones,and incidentals). Mileage billed at IRS rates($0.51/mile Jan 1,2011). Other direct costs(ODC)billed at actual cost plus 10%(e.g.,printing,travel and subcontractors). Effective January 2,2011 —15- General Manager Richard H.Solbrig -- • r1 • TTSouth TaDirectors x. ...�' .. James R.Jones Public Utility District , Ma"Lou Dale Me er Esic Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4c TO: Board of Directors FROM: John Thiel, Principal Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 • ITEM-PROJECT NAME: 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve Change Order No. 4 to Campbell Construction Company, Inc., in the credit amount of<$32,954.55>; (2) Approve the Project Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims; and (3) Authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk. DISCUSSION: Itemized list of this Change Order are as follows: Part A of this Change Order is the adjustment of original bid quantities to actual quantities installed resulting in a credit amount of<$30,881.30>. Part B of this Change Order is to adjust quantities from Change Order No. 1 to the actual quantity installed. Change Order No. 1 estimated 975 feet of 12" pipe to be installed at night and the actual quantity installed was 914 feet for a credit of <$1,573.25>. Part C is also an adjustment to Change Order No. 1 which included the deletion of intertie 25+75. The amount credited in Change Order No. 1 for this item was $15,000.00 but the actual bid amount was $15,500.00. Therefore, an additional <$500.00> credit is due. In regards to the Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims, staff has held a final inspection and found the contractor has met the project requirements. No stop notices have been received for this project. SCHEDULE: Upon Board approval. COSTS: <$32,954.55> ACCOUNT NO: 2029-8166/ IQWTRL BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: <$398,486 > ATTACHMENTS: Change Order No. 4; Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims; Notice of Completion —17— CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 4 Project 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project , •w•r•us1''I'�•. Contractor Campbell Construction Co. Inc. Date February 17, 2011 PO # P22851 The Contract Shall Be Changed As Follows: Part A is to adjust original bid quantities to final quantities as follows: Bid Item 5A, increase from 3,675 to 3,749 for a cost of$5,883; Bid Item 6A, increase from 842 to 881.5 for a cost of$1,975; Bid Item 7, decrease from 160 to 90 for a credit of$1,610; Bid Item 8, pay for 90% completion as final quantity for a credit of$780; Bid Item 9, pay for 90% completion as final quantity for a credit of$640; Bid Item 15, increase from 10 to 11 for a cost of$1,250; Bid Item 31, decrease from 3 to 1 for a credit of$8,000; Bid Item 34, decrease from 13 to 8 for a credit of$4,000; Bid Item 35, decrease from 180 to 0 for a credit of$6,660; Bid Item 36, increase from 7,400 to 9,170 for a cost of$2,655; Bid Item 38, increase from 27,600 to 30,646 for a cost of$5,939.70; Bid Item 40, decrease from 8,500 to 590 for a credit of$26,894 Total for Part A is a credit of$30,881.30 TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 IS ITEMS A through C = -$32,954.55 Ori•inal Contract $ 856,467.50 Previous Chan•e Orders $ 78 563.63 Current Contract $ 935,031.13 THIS CHANGE ORDER $ - 32,954.55 New Contract Total _ $ 902,076.58 Contractor agrees tomake the herein-described changes.in accordance with the terms hereof. The change in contract price and/or contract time noted is full settlement for costs incurred as a result of the change(s)described,unless specifically noted in individual description(s). Date: Authorized By STPUD Board President Date: Accepted By Contractor Date: Reviewed By -19- 1 CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS • THIS AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS is made in South Lake Tahoe, California, this day of February 2011, by and between South Tahoe Public Utility DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and Campbell Construction Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR". KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: 1. That the undersigned, as the authorized representative of CONTRACTOR, for and in consideration of Eight Hundred Fifty-Six Thousand Four Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars and Fifty Cents ($856,467.50), contract amount, and the sum of Forty-Five Thousand Six Hundred Nine Dollars and Eight Cents ($45,609.08) for said Contract Change Orders Nos. 1 through 4, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby and for each of its successors, assigns and partners, release acquit and forever discharge the SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT OF EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, and each of its successors, assigns, officers, agents, servants, and employees, from any and all rights, claims, demands, debts, obligations, liabilities, actions, damages, costs, expenses and other claims whatsoever, which might have been asserted against DISTRICT by reason of any matter or thing which was the subject matter of or basis for: A. The performance of all terms and conditions of that certain agreement dated May 24, 2010 for Purchase Order No. P22851, DISTRICT project described as 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project. B. Change Orders Nos. 1 through 4 as approved by the parties, pertaining to Purchase Order No. P22851 and shown in Payment Request No. 7, dated February 17, 2011. 2. That the undersigned, as the authorized representative of DISTRICT, for and in consideration of the CONTRACTOR's completion of Purchase Order No. P22851 does hereby and for each of its successors, and assigns, releases, acquits and forever discharge Campbell Construction Company, Inc. and each of its successors, assigns, officers, agents, servants, and employees, and sureties from any and all rights, claims, demands, debts, obligations, liability, actions, costs, expenses whatsoever which might have been asserted against CONTRACTOR, except for the rights accruing to the DISTRICT in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 337.15, Entitled "Ten Years - Action to Recover Damage from Latent Deficiencies in Planning or Construction of Improvements to Real Property," which rights are specifically not released, and except for warranties and sureties provided by reason of any matter or thing which was the subject matter of or basis for: A. The performance of all terms and conditions of that certain agreement dated May 24, 2010 for Purchase Order No. P22851, DISTRICT project described as 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project. B. Change Orders Nos. 1 through 4 and as approved by the parties, pertaining to Purchase Order No. P22851 and shown in Payment Request No. 7 dated February 17, 2011. • -21- 9. The releases made by the CONTRACTOR and the DISTRICT herein are•not to be construed as an admission or admissions of liability on the part of either party and that the parties deny liability hereof. The undersigneds agree that they will forever refrain and forebear from commencing, instituting or prosecuting any lawsuit, action or other proceeding against the other party based on, arising out of, or in any way connected with the subject matter of this Release. 10. The CONTRACTOR hereby releases the DISTRICT from all claims, including those of its Subcontractors for all delay and impact costs, if any. 11. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the DISTRICT that the CONTRACTOR has not heretofore assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer to any person, firm, corporation, association or entity any of the rights, claims, warranties, demands, debts, obligations, liabilities, actions, damages, costs, expenses and other claims whatsoever and the CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the DISTRICT against, without limitation, any and all rights; claims, warranties, demands, debts, obligations, liabilities, actions, damages, costs, expenses and other daims, including attorney's fees, arising out of or connected with any such assignment or transfer or purported assignment or transfer. 12. The undersigned acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel of their own choice in connection with the preparation and execution of this Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims. The undersigned acknowledge and represent that they understand and voluntarily consent and agree to each and every provision contained herein. 13. The undersigned further declare and represent that no promise, inducement or agreement, not herein expressed, have been made to the undersigned and that this Release contains the entire agreement among the parties hereto and that the terms of the Release are contractual and not a mere recital. 14. The persons executing this Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims represent and warrant to the other party that the execution and performance of the terms of this Release have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate, partnership, individual,or other entity requirements and that said persons have the right, power, legal capacity and authority to execute and enter in the Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims. RICHARD SOLBRIG, GENERAL MANAGER DATED ATTEST: KATHY SHARP, CLERK OF BOARD DATED CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. By: DATED Print/Type Name and Title of Signor -23- EXHIBIT"A" Notice of Completion 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project The work performed: the provision and installation of approximately 3,675 feet of 12" waterline, 160 feet of 8" waterline, services, meters, fire hydrants, interties, a pressure reducing station, and associated work including paving, revegetation, and traffic control. The work was located within El Dorado County at Meyers, CA. Some of the work is located in California Department of Transportation Highway 50 right-of-way. /// /// HI Notice of Completion 2010 Meyers Waterline Replacement Project EXHIBIT"A" -25- General Manager Ridand H.Soarig . -. - South T Chris Cafatu +�" '� Public Pkwtors James R.Jones �� uHic Utility District MaryDale Rise Lou Mosbadwr 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 54 4 6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4d TO: Board of Directors FROM: Julie Ryan, Senior Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Echo View and Angora Tanks Replacement REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve the Project Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims for Resource Development Company; and (2) Authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk. DISCUSSION: Staff has performed a final inspection of the project, and found that Resource Development Company has met all the requirements of the contract.Staff recommends approval of the project Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims, and the filing of a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: 2029-8809/ECHOTK; 2029-7064/ANGOTK BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $354,374; $353,284 ATTACHMENTS: Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims, Notice of Completion CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO • CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES t,'0 NO —27— RECORDING REQUESTED BY: South Tahoe Public Utility District Heidi C. Baugh WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe CA 96150 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE APN: 033-623-12;032-060-10; 032-060-13; 032-060-15;032-060-16 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is South Tahoe Public Utility District 3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is 1275 Meadow Crest Drive,South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150 4. The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: In fee. (If other than fee,strike"in fee"and insert here,for example,"purchaser under contract of purchase,"or lessee." 5. The FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of ALL PERSONS, if any,WHO HOLD SUCH INTEREST or ESTATE with the undersigned as JOINT TENANTS or as TENANTS IN COMMON are: Name&Address Name&Address 6. The FULL NAMES of FULL ADDRESSES OF THE PREDECESSORS in INTEREST of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to: Name&Address Name&Address 7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED on 12/6/2010. 8. The work of improvement completed is desaibed as follows: 2010 Echo View and Angora Tanks Replacement Project. 9. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR,if any,for such work of improvement is RDC,Inc. 10. The street address of said property is See attached Exhibit A. 11. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of South Lake Tahoe,County of El Dorado, State of California,and is described as follows: (See Exhibit A, attached. As shown in Exhibit"A"attached hereto wind made a part hereof, DATE: February 17, 2011 SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT OF OWNERDALE RISE VERIFICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNER: Board President, So.Tahoe PUD I,the undersigned,dedare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice;that I have read said notice,that I know and understand the contents thereof,and the facts stated therein are true and correct. DATE AND PLACE SIGNATURE OF OWNER NAMED IN PARAGRAPH 2 VERIFICATION FOR NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNER: SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY D ISTR I CIB I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury under the taws o the tate California that I am the oard Fres 1 dent of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice; that I have read the said notice, that I know and understand the contents thereof,and that the facts stated therein are true and correct. 2/17/11 at South Lake Tahoe, California DATE AND PLACE SIGNATURE OF PERSON SIGNING ON BEHALF OF OWNER Dale Rise, Board President South Tahoe Public Utility District -29— Notice of Completion "vek South -y Public Utility District l 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of the Notice of Completion that was approved by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, County of El Dorado, State of California, and executed by Board President, Dale Rise. Date Approved: Certified by: Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board -31- 4. The DISTRICT has received no claims from the CONTRACTOR. 5. Upon execution of this agreement, the DISTRICT agrees to immediately file and record a NOTICE OF COMPLETION with the County Recorder in order to begin the running of the statutory lien period. 6. The presently retained amount is $ 26,042.63 Original Contract amount $466,700.00 Total Change Order Amount $ 54,152.40 Less: Amount Previously Paid $494,809.77 (Request Nos. 1 through 8) Retainage $ 26,042.63 BALANCE: $ -0- The retainage will be released to the CONTRACTOR at the expiration of the lien period 35 (thirty-five) calendar days after date of recording a NOTICE OF COMPLETION by El Dorado County Recorder or when all liens have been released, whichever last occurs. Release pursuant to this agreement shall not apply to CONTRACTOR's rights to the presently retained amount until such time as such amounts are received in full by CONTRACTOR. 7. CONTRACTOR and DISTRICT agree that the total adjusted contract price and time of performance for Purchase Order No. after the execution of change orders shall be as follows: Original Contract Price $466,700.00 Original Calendar Days 218 Total Adjusted Price $520,852.40 Total Adjusted Calendar Days 8. It is understood and agreed by the undersigneds that the facts with respect to which the foregoing Release is given may hereafter turn out to be other than or different from the facts in that connection now known to be or believed by said undersigneds to be true, and the undersigneds hereto expressly assume the risk of the facts turning out to be . .different than they now so appear, and agreethat the foregoing Release shall be, in all respects, effective and not subject to termination or recession by any such difference in facts and undersigneds hereby expressly waive any and all rights the undersigneds have or may have under California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides as follows: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the Release which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." 9. The releases made by the CONTRACTOR and the DISTRICT herein are not to be construed as an admission or admissions of liability on the part of either party and that the parties deny liability hereof. The undersigneds agree that they will forever refrain and forebear from commencing, instituting or prosecuting any lawsuit, action or other -33- 2 General Manager Rkhard H.Solbrlg Director,South T -?--'' vx�. James R Jones r Public Utility District , "atyLou _ Schafer 1275 Meadow Cruet Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.5tpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4e TO: Board of Directors FROM: Julie Ryan, Senior Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Headworks Replacement Phase 1 REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve the Project Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims for Evans Brothers, Inc.; and (2) Authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk. DISCUSSION: Staff has performed a final inspection of the project, and found that Evans Brothers has met all the requirements of the contract.Staff recommends approval of the project Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims, and the filing of a Notice of Completion with the El Dorado County Clerk. • SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: 1029-8033/HDWKP1 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $1,457,492 plus $9,000,000 future funding to complete Phase II of the Headworks project. ATTACHMENTS: Closeout Agreement and Release of Claims, Notice of Completion CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTI• , • CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES,- f�/4.. NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES 7_1:i NO -35- RECORDING REQUESTED BY: South Tahoe Public Utility District Heidi C. Baugh WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe CA 96150 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE APN: 025-061-32 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT 3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is 1275 Meadow Crest Drive,South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150 4. The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: In fee. (If other than fee,strike In fee"and insert here,for example,"purchaser under contract of purchase,"or"lessee." 5. The FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of ALL PERSONS, if any,WHO HOLD SUCH INTEREST or ESTATE with the undersigned as JOINT TENANTS or as TENANTS IN COMMON are: Name&Address Name&Address 6. The FULL NAMES of.FULL ADDRESSES OF THE PREDECESSORS in INTEREST of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to: Name&Address Name&Address 7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED on 10/22/2010. 8. The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Headworks Replacement Phase I Demolition. 9. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR,if any,for such work of improvement is Evans Brothers Inc. 10. The street address of said property is 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. 11. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of South Lake Tahoe County of El Dorado,State of California,and is described as follows: (See Exhibit "A" attached)As shown in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof,a�d.eaa moral hewn-a DATE: February 17, 2011 SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT OF OWNER DALE RISE VERIFICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNER: Board President. So. Tahoe PUD I,the undersigied,dedare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice;that I have read said notice,that I know and understand the contents thereof,and the facts stated therein are true and correct. DATE AND PLACE SIGNATURE OF OWNER NAMED IN PARAGRAPH 2 VERIFICATIONFORNON-INDMDUAL OWNER: South Tahoe Public Utility District I,the undersigned,dedare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the Boa rd Prec i dent of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice; that I have read the said notice, that I know and understand the contents thereof,and that the facts stated therein are true and correct. 2/17/11 at South Lake Tahoe, California DATE AND PLACE SI NATURE OF PERSON SIGNING QN BEHALF OF OWNER Dale Rise, BoardPresident South Tahoe Public Utility District —37— Notice of Completion • 1950 • 4% .•.-----,- weep South .-i,.... --_4- Public Utility District J 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 5,14-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of the Notice of Completion that was approved by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, County of El Dorado, State of California, and executed by Board President, Dale Rise. Date Approved: Certified by: Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board -39- 3. Nothing contained herein shall waive or alter the rights, privileges, and powers of the DISTRICT or the duties, liabilities and obligations of the CONTRACTOR and its surety in respect to any portions of the Specifications for Purchase Order No. P22640. 4. The DISTRICT has received no claims from the CONTRACTOR. 5. Upon execution of this agreement, the DISTRICT agrees to immediately file and record a NOTICE OF COMPLETION with the County Recorder in order to begin the running of the statutory lien period. 6. The presently retained amount is $ 70,436.94 Original Contract amount $545,380.00 Total Change Order Amount $158,989.44 Less: Amount Previously Paid $633,932.50 (Request Nos. 1 through 6) Retainage $ 70,436.94 BALANCE: $ -0- The retainage will be released to the CONTRACTOR at the expiration of the lien period 35 (thirty-five) calendar days after date of recording a NOTICE OF COMPLETION by El Dorado County Recorder or when all liens have been released, whichever last occurs. Release pursuant to this agreement shall not apply to CONTRACTOR's rights to the presently retained amount until such time as such amounts are received in full by CONTRACTOR. 7. CONTRACTOR and DISTRICT agree that the total adjusted contract price and time of performance for Purchase Order No. after the execution of change orders shall be as follows: Original Contract Price $545,380.00 Original Calendar Days 271 Total Adjusted Price $704,369.44 Total Adjusted Calendar Days 8. It is understood and agreed by the undersigneds that the facts with respect to which the foregoing Release is given may hereafter turn out to be other than or different from the facts in that connection now known to be or believed by said undersigneds to be true, and the undersigneds hereto expressly assume the risk of the facts turning out to be different than they now so appear, and agree that the foregoing Release shall be, in all respects, effective and not subject to termination or recession by any such difference in facts and undersigneds hereby expressly waive any and all rights the undersigneds have or may have under California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides as follows: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the Release which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." HEADWORKS PHASE 1:DEMOLITION AND SITE PREP41- 2 General Manager Richard H.Solbrtg • • 1950 •~----,.,...) ` South DirectorsChris Gelato /Y .0 R.Jones K„:„. _ s {- Public Utility District ` "Lou MoebscherDale Rise Edo Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4f TO: Board of Directors FROM: Randy Curtis, Manager of Field Operations MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Sale of Surplus Generator REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve sale of surplus generator to Nevada Generator Systems, in the amount of$3,500. DISCUSSION: The 125 KW Kohler generator was removed from service in late 2007 from the South Upper Truckee Well site. A new facility was built with a larger generator installed that the District moved from the Airport Well. The surplus generator no longer meets California Air Board emission requirements and therefore cannot be sold or operated in California. Previous District generators sold at auction have brought less than $3,000. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: N/A ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO - CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES % NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES tilt. NO -43- General Manager Waal a Solbrlg . 1!..0 • Lip (--J ':,:-; - DirectorsChris C.efalu Public Utility District James R.Jones May Lou MoabacherDale Rise Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544--6474•Fax 530 541-0614•wwwstpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4g TO: Board of Directors FROM: Randy Curtis, Manager of Field Operations MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Hydro Truck Bid REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize staff to advertise for bids for a sewer cleaning truck and machine. DISCUSSION: The hydro trucks are the work horses for collection system maintenance. They will water jet clean lines from 6" to 24". The hydros are used in the daily preventive maintenance program (CMMS) for systematically cleaning the 314 miles of District sewer main. They are the main equipment relied upon for breaking line stoppages or back-ups within our system.The current vehicle this will replace is a 1999 with 156,581 miles and 11,586 hours of operation. It is showing the signs of age and general work fatigue i.e. loose front end, loss of compression, and reduced pump capacity. The truck does not meet California emission requirements and will require an engine replacement. The date for this requirement is still being considered by the Air Resources Board. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible. COSTS: $190,000 Estimate from quotes ACCOUNT NO: 1005-8106 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $186,000 ATTACHMENTS: Bid Specs CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO • CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YESNO ier -45- HYDRO TRUCK SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL It is the intent of these specifications to describe the minimum requirements for a high pressure hydraulic cleaner designed to use high velocity water jets to remove obstructions,soluble grease, sand, and other materials from sanitary sewer pipe drains and other conduits. The unit, including all necessary equipment, shall be furnished complete and ready for use. All parts not specifically mentioned which are required for a complete unit shall conform in design,strength, quality of material and workmanship to the highest standards of engineering practice. The sewer cleaning machine shall be the manufacturer standard. It shall be equipped with the manufacturer equipment and accessories which are included as standard in the advertised and published literature for the unit. No such item of equipment or accessories shall be removed or omitted for the reason that it was not specified in the bid. Standard product items may be removed only where it is necessary to install other items in lieu thereof in order to comply with these specifications. Vehicle to meet all State of California and Federal regulations when in operable condition. This is to include all fuel tanks filled,water tanks filled, and any other accessory equipment which may be used on this vehicle. Delivery of vehicle will be to the South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD), it will then be weighed in a fully operable condition. Acceptance of vehicle by STPUD will be after the California Highway Patrol acknowledges that the vehicle does meet all State and federal laws and weight restrictions. HIGH VELOCITY SEWER FLUSHING UNIT A. Water Pump shall be Myers D65-20 triplex positive displacement pump or equal, rated at 65 gpm at 2000 psi. Pump shall be gear driven; crankshaft speed shall not exceed 500 rpm. Pump suction shall be fitted with a 20 mesh stainless steel screen "Y" strainer, located for easy removal while standing outside of unit at ground level. B. Water Tanks shall have a total capacity of 1500 U.S. gallons. The tanks shall be constructed of polyethylene adequately designed to withstand normal usage. Access to the tank top shall be provided via a ladder permanently mounted on the curb side of the unit. The tank shall be fitted with a pump intake line located 2" above the tank bottom and provided with a shut-off valve. In addition, the tank shall be fitted with a 2" diameter gate valve for draining with a control handle extending to the curb side of the unit. -47- truck engine is running. Pump shall have a minimum rating of 0-8 gpm at 2000 psi. The hose reel hydraulic system shall be equipped with separate built-in overload relief valve, directional control and speed control valves. The hose reel shall have the capability to extend out from back of truck via a hydraulically powered cylinder.The hose reel will lock into position using a spring loaded safety pin at 2" intervals. The hose reel should rotate at least 180 degrees when fully extended from rear of truck to provide direct alignment to manholes. F. Controls A control panel shall be located at the rear of the unit with all controls within easy reach and view of the operator when standing at the control panel. Controls shall include: 1. Electronic throttle for the truck engine. 2. Hydraulic oil and water pressure system shall be equipped with glycerin filled gauges. 3. Hose reel speed control dial and directional control lever. 4. Plastic water level sight gage and low water warning light to show three minutes running time at 65 gpm. 5. Water tank fill pipe and fill hose. A-Y Strainer on fill hose. 6. Tachometer for front truck engine. 7. High oil temperature warning light and low oil pressure. 8. Engine warning light or limp mode on low oil pressure and overheat at operator station. G. Water System Piping and appurtenant fittings shall be suitable for a working pressure of 2000 psi. Pump discharge shall be fitted with a repairable pressure regulator adjustable from 0-2000 psi. I. Body The completed unit shall be equipped with tool compartments and storage boxes to house the necessary operating accessories. All storage compartments and access openings shall have lockable doors constructed of stainless steel or aluminum. Skirting on the sides and full rear width of the unit shall be of 10 gauge extending the full height of the tool boxes with cut outs for rear wheels. There shall be an expanded drip tray directly below the hose reel for water drainage and bolt on metal covers on both sides of the unit between the water tank and the pump compartment. J. Painting All metal shall be cleaned and primed before painting. Sewer cleaning unit including interior of unit shall be painted to match the truck cab color(frost white). K. Mounting Mounting of the pressure compensating pump at the PTO location shall be made to avoid interruption with a driver's visibility and must not extend outside of the truck chassis rails. Truck chassis shall have front bumper extension beyond the operating components for protection of the components. -49- lb-ft torque @ 1400 rpm. Engine exhaust emissions shall meet or exceed Federal and State of California Emissions Standards. Tier 4 D. Engine Electrical An 80 amp alternator shall be engine mounted. Batteries shall be 12 volt rated at 1500 amps cold cranking current @ 0 F. and have 320 minutes reserve capacity at 80 F. E. Engine Cooling System Truck shall be provided with a heavy duty radiator with adequate capacity to maintain the provided diesel engine at proper operating temperatures under all operating conditions. Corrosion inhibitor shall be provided, Nalcool additive or equal. F. Additional Engine Equipment Engine shall be equipped with a Dry-type air cleaner with 12" front intake. Air cleaner shall be Donaldson, Fram or equal, engine mounted and included a pop-up indicator and ether cup. A belt driven 12 cu ft water cooled Bendix Westinghouse TRU FLO 501 or equal compressor shall be provided for the brake system. Factory installed power steering shall be provided. An alarm system for oil pressure and water temperature shall be provided. The system shall include lights and buzzers for low oil pressure and high water temperature. Features shall be included with engine shutdown. An engine hour meter shall be provided. Engine shall be equipped with an electronic type hand throttle. G. Exhaust Eauipment Truck shall be provided with a single vertical exhaust system with horizontal muffler mounted on the right side of the cab and shall include a heat guard. H. Transmission and Equipment Unit shall be similar or equal to 5-speed automatic, Allison MD3060 DRD with a torque rating of 625 lb-ft. Manufacturer recommended. I. Factory Air Conditioning J. Front Axle and Equipment Front axle capacity shall be minimum 12,000 lbs and includes power steering and grease filled wheel seals. Front suspension shall be heavy duty, rated at 12,000 lb capacity with springs rated at 6,000 each @ ground and including heavy duty shock absorbers. K. Rear Axle and Equipment Rear axle shall be Eaton model 21065S single speed or equal rated at 21,000 and shall include a magnetic filler and drain plugs. Speed Ratio 4.11. Rear suspension system shall be heavy duty, rated at 23,000 lbs with each wheel rated 11,500 lbs @ ground. -51- General Manager Richard H.5olbrig South Tahoe. Chris Cefakir-=- Directors "" James sRJones Public Utility District MaryLouCoale Rise " F-ric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.etpud.u5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4h TO: Board of Directors FROM: Paul A. Sciuto, Assistant General Manager/Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: 2010 Legal Review of Front-,End Specifications REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve amendment to the existing contract with Best, Best & Krieger (BB & K) LLP in the amount of$3,102.50. DISCUSSION: The District contracted with BB & K to perform a review of the District's Front-end Construction Contract Specifications. BB & K has completed all items identified in the initial scope of work. However, the District requested additional assistance on tasks that were not anticipated at the time the original proposal was prepared. In particular BB& K assisted in the preparation of the two pre-qualification packages associated with the Headworks Phase II project, answered questions during the pre- qualification process, and clarified questions arising from the changes made to the Front-End specifications. Staff requests the Board approve the amendment in the amount of$3,102.50 to BB & K's original contract which is being performed under their current Master Services Agreement with the District. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible. COSTS: $3,102.50 ACCOUNT NO: 1029-4475, 2029-4475 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $25,861 ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION• CATEGORY: Sewer&Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES - NO O CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES .'. NO -53- General Manager ?Muni H.So!brig • 850 • Directors O v_= South TChris Wale ,� 10.. "_'�vx.,. James R.Janes . - - Public Utility District , ' "Lo" 'Rise 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 41 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager Nancy Hussmann, Human Resources Director MEETING DATE: February 17, 201 1 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Union Memorandum of Understanding REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve Letter of Understanding extending the Union contract one year to June 20, 2012; and (2) Authorize execution of same. DISCUSSION: Staff met with Charlie Solt, Business Representative for Stationary Engineers Local 39, regarding the expiration of the Union contract on June 23, 2010. Mr. Solt proposed that the contract be extended for a year,with no cost of living adjustments, maintaining current level of benefits, and agreement to begin preparations for a Compensation Study in January, 2012. District staff recommends that the District accept the Union's proposal, with the addition of adding language regarding the new Health Improvement Program that was effective January 1, 2011. A Letter of Understanding was drafted and is going through the signature process with the Union. As soon as all Union signatures are obtained, the Letter of Understanding would be presented to the Board and District staff for signature. SCHEDULE: Sign Letter of Understanding when returned by Union COSTS: -0- ACCOUNT NO: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Understanding between the South Tahoe P.U.D. and Stationary Engineers Local 39 CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTI• , CATEGORY: General GENERAL MANAGER: YES _s NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO —55— Letter of Understanding Between the South Tahoe Public Utility District And International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers, Local 39 This letter memorializes the agreement between the South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) and the International Union of Operating Engineers,Stationary Engineers, Local 39 (Union) representing the South Tahoe Public Utility Employees' bargaining unit. The purpose of this letter is to amend the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated June 29, 2006-June 23, 2010 and the subsequent Letter of Agreement dated April 14, 2010,with the understanding between the parties outlined below: 1. Extend the current contract, side letters, addendums and any other applicable agreements through June 20, 2012. 2. There will be no Cost of Living Adjustments with this extension. 3. The level of benefits will remain the same, including the Wellness Guidelines changes that took effect January 1, 2011. 4. In addition, effective January 1, 2011, a new Health Improvement Program will be initiated. The H.I.P. is a voluntary program consisting of testing, evaluations, lectures, and coaching and a participating employee can earn up to three 8 hours off per rolling year by participating and meeting the agreed upon goals. The Health Improvement Program is described in detail in a separate section of the binder with the updated Health Insurance Plan Document dated 1/1/11. 5. Preparations for the Salary Survey, including review of job descriptions, will begin in January, 2012. Dated this day of , 2011 For the International Union of Operating Engineers,Stationary For the South Tahoe Public Utility District Engineers, Local 39 Dale Rise, President Jerry Kalmar, Business Manager • Richard H.Solbrig, General Manager Madison Bland, President Joan Bryant, Director of Public Employees -57- General Manager Richard H.Sobrig • 1950 • w r South DirectorsChris Walt' James R.Jones Public Utility District Ericschafier 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4j TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Luther Pass Pump Station (LPPS) Standby Power Generation Facility REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Approve Change Order No. 5 to Sierra Nevada Construction, Inc., in the amount of$5,526; and (2) Add eighty-eight (88) calendar days to the contract time. DISCUSSION: The itemized parts of Change Order No. 5 are as follows: Item 1, in the amount of$3,245, is to furnish and install a wooden exterior door for utility access to the inlet louver. During construction, pump and heavy maintenance crew personnel suggested that a walk-through door be added above the south wall of the new generator building for future maintenance and repairs to the inlet louver actuator assembly. The added labor and materials for addition of this access door is an extra work item that was not part of the original contract documents. Item 2, in the amount of$559, is to complete fuel supply line modifications requested by the engineer in Information Bulletin No. 8 (11/23/2010). The modifications were added in response to contractor questions and comments during fuel line construction.These modifications included replacing a motor actuated anti-siphon valve with a poppet- style valve; added installation of priming tees and lockable valves and substitution of y-strainers for basket strainers in the fuel oil piping plan (1/M-102). The added labor, materials and material credit for accepted valve and strainer substitutions are an extra work item that was not part of the original contract documents. Item 3, in the amount of$1,722, is to slurry seal approximately 4,100 square feet of existing A/C pavement that was not replaced as part of the LPPS standby power generator facility upgrade project. The cost to seal the added pavement will be performed on a unit cost basis and shall be completed in conjunction with sealing and touch-up repairs to new A/C pavement postponed until spring 2011.The added pavement work is an extra work item that was not part of the original contract documents. -59- r.1I CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 5 -�� Project: LPPS STANDBY POWER GENERATOR FACILITY •>+�w°►•i�p•M°‘`� Contractor: Sierra Nevada Construction.Inc. Date: 02.17.2011 PO#: P22641 The Contract Shall Be Changed As Follows: 1) Increase$3,245.00 to furnish and install one 36"x 82"wooden exterior door with cyber lock door set as per the District's request for an added access door(email from I. Bergsohn, dated 11/30/2010). The increase includes all additional labor, equipment, material costs and contractor mark-up, complete and in-place in accordance with SNC Letter No. 22 (12/14/10). Total Item 1 is$3,245.00 2) Increase$559.00 to furnish and install generator fuel supply modification items:A.Anti- , Siphon Valve; B. Priming Valves; C Lockable Valves;and D. Y-strainers, in accordance with Information Bulletin No. 8(11/23/2010).The increase includes all additional labor, equipment, material costs and contractor mark-up for this change,complete and in-place in accordance with SNC Letter No. 23 (12/14/10). Total Item 2 is$559.00 TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO.5, ITEMS 1 —6 IS:• $5526.00 ::..: =: - Original Contract $2,027,007.00 263 Calendar Days Previous Change Order $81,615.44 24 Calendar Days Current Contract $2,108,622.44 237 calendar Days THIS CHANGE ORDER $5,526,00 88 Calendar Days New Contract Total $2,114,148.44 375 Calendar Days Contractor agrees to make the herein-described changes in accordance with the terms hereof. The change in contract price anchor contract time noted is full settlement for costs incurred because of the change(s) described,unless specifically noted in individual description(s). Date: Authorized By STPUD Board President . Date:, d /q/u Accepted By bon actor Date: • Reviewed By 1 -61- so 0" TgyOlc wer • 1950 •44'_e NG vnury ` SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Richard Solbri•,General Manager Paul •, Assistant General Mana•er Dale Rise, President BOARD MEMBERS Mary Lou Mosbacher,Vice President James R. Jones, Director Eric W.Schafer, Direc • Chris Cefalu, Director REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT JANUARY 20,2011 MINUTES BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ROLL CALL President Rise, Directors Cefalu, Schafer, Jones. Director Mosbacher was absent. STAFF: Solbrig, Sharp, Sciuto, Hughes, Bergsohn, Brown, Ryon, VanGorden, Hoggatt, Johnson, Thiel, Curtis, Bledsoe, Attorney Herrema GUESTS: John Runnels,tiector Hernandez John Riathets led the pledge to the flog. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE John Runnels reported Lakeside Auto has a delivery COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE service Of:strict staff should utilizein order to reduce costs for staff time, and vehicle and ftel usage. Hector Hernandreported to the Board that the water meter program was unfair sktce after rebuilding his home as a result of the Angora fire, he had to pay for and install a water meter, while others have since received free water meters and installation. The Board explained the policy regarding water meters and that unfortunately, there is nothing that can be done to resolve this problem. Director Schafer requested Consent Item h. (USDA CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR Forest Service Sewer Special Use Permit) be removed CONSENT CALENDAR from this agenda and placed on a future agenda -63- REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES-JANUARY 20,2011 PAGE-3 h. Item removed; CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) i. Approved Regular Board Meeting Minutes: December 2, 2010; j. Approved Regular Board Meeting Minutes: December 16, 2010. ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION Julie Ryan reported nine bids were received at the HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT January 12 bid opening. Ryan reviewed three minor PHASE 2 contractual deviations found, and implications of those deviations which did not materially affect the bid. Moved Jones 1 Second Schafer/Mosbacher Absent/ Passed to waive the minor bid irregularities and award the bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, GSE Construction, in the amount of$8,020,860.29. Moved Schafer/Second Cefalu / Mosbacher Absent/ PAYMENT Of CLAIMS Passed to approve payment in the amount of $1,580,359.07. Water and Wastewater mations Committee: The BOARD MEMBER STANDING committee met on January 17. Minutes of the meeting COMMITTEE REPORTS are available upon reque t. Finance Committee: The committee met January 20 and discussed servicO charges to turn water on and oftand will Likely, � mend feesbe waived for calls received during rtal business hour and incase the service ch _ or calls received on weekends or outside of normattysiness hours, to covercost of overtime. The comm. £ also discussed the second proposal received from City staff for the Aspens low-income housing project. it propoutwas that the District finance half of the Capacity charges (pay the water, finance the sewer) and give a 3%loan on the remain- ing $580,000 over 50 years. However, their proposal does not explain how the $10,000 annual payment can be paid. Additional discussions are needed before a final recommendation can be made. Lukins Water Company: Richard Solbrig reported no BOARD MEMBER AD HOC COMMITTEE comments have been received from City staff regarding REPORTS the "think piece" that was developed to help identify potential funding sources for system improvements. -65- REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES-JANUARY 20, 2011 PAGE-5 3:35 P.M. RECONVENED TO OPEN SESSION ACTION / REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION No reportable Board action. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-Existing Litigation re: United States of America v. Alpine Land& Reservoir, Co., et al., Civil Acti3n No. 3:73-cv-00183-LDG, Subfile 3:73-cv-00207-LDG, United States District Court for the District of Nevada No reportable Board action. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-Existing Litigation re: False Claims Act Case: United States, the States of California, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, and Tennessee and the Commonwealths of Machusetts and Virginia ex ret. John Hendrix v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A., Civil Action No. ED CV06-0055-GW, United States District Court for the Central District of California Moved Rise � , :. - hafer " bactter Absent/ Pursuant to Government Code ,x _..m�:��, , / Passed to rove fhb ' tion o9= ation.The action, Section 54956.9(c)/Conference with defenckx14S, and other particulars wit once formally Legal Counsel-Anticipated Litigation commenced, be disclosed to any person;upon inquiry, (One Case) unless to do so would jeopardize the District's ability to effectuate service of process on one or more unserved parties, or that to do so would jeopardize the District's ability to conCI,rde existing settlement negotiations to its advantage. (See Gov. Code, 54957.1(a)(2).) No reportable Board oc*n. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(a)/Conference with Labor Negotiators: Richard Solbrig/ General Manager, Board of Directors Employee Organization:Stationary Engineers, Local 39 3:35 P.M. ADJOURNMENT -67- sou" rA1100 sver • 1950 •`14._, 4C V77LrrY 0151- SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Richard Solbrig, General Manager Paul SciQ,Assistant General Manager Dale Rise, President BOARD MEMBERS Mary Lou Mosbacher, Vice President James R.Jones, Director Eric W.Schafer, Director Chris Cefalu, Director REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT FEBRUARY 3, 2011 MINUTES BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ROLL CALL • President Rise, Directors Cefalu, Jones, Mosbacher, Schafer STAFF: Soibrig,Sharp, Sciuto, Hugh; Ryan, C. Stanley, Thiel, Hoggatt, P. Lavallee, Ber n, Bledsoe, Cocking, Curtis, Attorney Herrema GUESTS: Garth Ailing/Hauge Brueck John Thiel led the pledge to the fag. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE An opportunity was providectto receive public comments COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE on the environmental document for the Headworks Replacement Project: Phase 2. No public comments were received. Moved Schafer/Second cecilu /Passed Unanimously CONSENT CALENDAR to approve the Consent Cdendar as submitted: a. Resolution for Bureau of Reclamation Water Grant- Adopted Resolution No. 2887-11 approving grant funding for hydropower generation unit on C-line, Alpine County; b. Diamond Valley Ranch Permitting Assistance-Authorized an increase to Purchase Order No. P22728 for preparation of a Title 22 Engineering Report, in the amount of$4,000; -69- REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES-FEBRUARY 3, 2011 . PAGE-3 Moved Cefalu /Second Rise/ Passed Unanimously PAYMENT OF CLAIMS to approve payment in the amount of$2,041,475.66. Water and Wastewater Operations Committee: The BOARD MEMBER STANDING committee met on January 31. Minutes of the meeting COMMITTEE REPORTS are available upon-request. The next Board meeting will be held February 9. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR REPRESENTATIVE REPORT Director Mosbacher reported she attended a recent BOARD MEMBER REPORTS Alpine County/STPUD Contracts Commission meeting where a recent grand jury report was discussed, as well a possible effort to change the District's contract in hopes of increasing the amount of money the District pays to Alpine County annually. President Rise reported on his request to staff to show the feature Poverty to Prosperity at the March 17 Board meeting; on his attendance at an architects/surveyors meeting and discussion re:water and sewer inspections for new con- struction; there is an effort to change the stop and drain practice so as to discontinue the use of stop and drains and use curb stops instead; and the city fire marshall is now a battalion chief and may not be performing fie line inspections. Richard Soibrig reported on informational presentations GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS given to local service organizations;identification of potential projects and areas for study for energy recovery in Alpine County; the Health Improvement Program was launchedt5pro*hately 50 employees participated in the hegg: risk assessment;staff and board compensation infor n was provided to the State Controller as requested to provkle further transparency for special districts. District fnf• f•tion Officer: Dente Cocking reported an STAFF REPORTS additional linCfeading to ages and minutes was added on the t trict's interne$home page. Customer Service Manager:Tim Bledsoe announced that customer service now takes credit card payments in person and by telephone. 3:15 P.M. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION 3:20 P.M. RECONVENED TO OPEN SESSION -71- uesnarair nnseriager Richard H.So*rig South •'� Directors . �.� .lames R.Jones Public Utility District Wry Lou Mosbacher Dale Rise Sdiafesr 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 961504401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7a TO: Board of Directors FROM: Paul A.Sciuto, Assistant General Manager/Engineer MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: USDA Sewer Special Use Permit REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Authorize execution of a Cost Recovery Agreement with the USDA Forest Service for processing the District's Special Use Permit Application; and (2) Authorize payment of the estimated processing fee in the amount of $51,672.54. DISCUSSION: The District's Special Use Permit (SUP) for sewer facilities on Forest Service land expired a number of years ago. After the District settled its portion of the Meyer's Landfill litigation, the District submitted an application package for a new SUP in March 2010. The Forest Service has determined that there is a fee to cover costs associated with processing the master sewer line permit renewal that needs to be reimbursed by the District. The practice of using a Category 6 cost recovery agreement is consistent with other utilities in the basin when the anticipated level of effort by the Forest Service exceeds 50 hours. Recently the Forest Service has executed similar agreements with Sierra Pacific and Verizon. The application processing includes review and analysis of 12 items including but not limited to Cultural Resources, Botany, Hydrology, and NEPA. The specialist in each area of review attempts to utilize existing information in their analysis and generally performs new field surveys when absolutely necessary. If the actual costs of processing the application are lower than the estimated fee, the District will be reimbursed the remaining amount. SCHEDULE: COSTS: $51,672.54 ACCOUNT NO: 1029-6650 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $4,988-Additional cost impact has been factored Into estimated year end fund balances. ATTACHMENTS: Cost Recovery Agreement 7eost Recovery Estimate FS-2700-26(03/06) USDA Forest Service OMB No.0596-0082 CR Agreement#: 11 MJ-11051900541 CATEGORY 6 MAJOR COST RECOVERY AGREEMENT between USDA Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit and South Tahoe Public Utility District(STPUD) This agreement is entered into between the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit(the Forest Service), and South Tahoe Public Utility(STPUD)(the applicant)under 36 CFR 251.58. A. RECITALS 1. On December 13, 2010,the Forest Service accepted the applicant's application for use and occupancy of National Forest System lands(hereinafter"the application"),which is enumerated in Appendix A. The Forest Service shall assess-the applicant a cost recovery fee for the agency's costs to process the application. 2. The Forest Service has determined that the fee for processing the application falls within category 6 . under the applicable Forest Service processing fee schedule and/or that the fee for monitoring the applicant's special use authorization falls within category 6 under the applicable Forest Service monitoring fee schedule. 3. The geographic area to be covered by this agreement is located throughout South Lake Tahoe, California, Eldorado County. See Appendix B. 4. The application has been submitted or the applicant's special use authorization is being issued under an authority other than the Mineral Leasing Act, and the applicant has not waived payment of reasonable costs. Therefore,the Forest Service is entitled to recover its full reasonable costs incurred in processing the application or monitoring the authorization. 5. Payment of a processing fee by the applicant does not obligate the Forest Service to authorize the applicant's proposed use and occupancy. If the application is denied or withdrawn in writing,the applicant is responsible for costs incurred by the Forest Service in processing the application up to and including the date the agency denies the application or receives written notice of the applicant's withdrawal. If the applicant withdraws the application, the applicant also is responsible for any costs subsequently incurred by the Forest Service in terminating consideration of the application. 6 The Forest Service shall determine the appropriate level of environmental analysis for the application and inform.the applicant prior to initiating the environmental analysis. 7. Information associated with this agreement may be released to the public in accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. -75- 6. Underpayment. When the estimated processing fee is lower than the full actual costs of processing an application submitted under the Mineral Leasing Act, or lower than the full reasonable costs(when the applicant has not waived payment of reasonable costs)of processing an application submitted under other authorities,the applicant shall pay the difference between the estimated and full actual or reasonable processing costs within 30 days of billing. 7. Overpayment. If payment of the processing fee exceeds the full actual costs of processing an application submitted under the Mineral Leasing Act, or the full reasonable costs(when the applicant has not waived payment of reasonable costs)of processing an application submitted under other authorities, the Forest Service shall either(a)refund the excess payment to the applicant or(b)at the applicant's request,credit it towards monitoring fees due. 8. Disputes a. If the applicant disagrees with the estimated dollar amount of the processing costs,the applicant may submit a written request before the disputed fee is due for substitution of alternative estimated costs to the immediate supervisor of the authorized officer who determined the estimated costs.The written request must include supporting documentation. b. If the applicant pays the full disputed processing fee, the Forest Service shall continue to process the application during the supervisory officer's review of the disputed fee, unless the applicant requests that the application processing cease. c. If the applicant fails to pay the full disputed processing fee, the Forest Service shall suspend further processing of the application pending the supervisory officer's determination of an appropriate processing fee and the applicant's payment of that fee. d.The authorized officer's immediate supervisor shall render a decision on a disputed processing fee within 30 calendar days of receipt of the written request from the applicant. The supervisory officer's decision is the final level of administrative review. The dispute shall be decided in favor of the applicant if the supervisory officer does not respond to the written request within 30 days of receipt. 9. Lack of Administrative Appeal. A decision by an authorized officer to assess a processing fee or to determine the estimated costs is not subject to administrative appeal. A decision by an authorized officer's immediate supervisor in response to a request for substitution of alternative estimated costs likewise is not subject to administrative appeal. 10. Amendment. Modifications to this agreement shall be made in writing and shall be signed and dated by both parties. 11. Expiration and Termination. This agreement expires on December 31,2013. Either party, in writing, may terminate this agreement in whole or in part at any time before it expires. The applicant is responsible for all Forest Service costs covered by this agreement that are incurred up to the date of expiration or termination. 12. Principal Point of Contact. The Forest Service and the applicant shall each establish a principal point of contact for purposes of this agreement. The Forest Service's contact is Brian Hansen, Realty Specialist, 530-543-2870, US Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150. The applicant's contact is Paul Sciuto,Assistant General Manager/Engineer, 530-543-6202,South Tahoe Public Utility District, 1275 Meadow Crest Dr., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 -77- APPENDIX A Applications and Authorizations Subject to this Agreement Applications ELD4008-06: A written application has been accepted under this reference number. The special use permit, if approved, will use the same reference number. The proposal includes a renewal of South Tahoe Public Utility Districts(STPUD)master permit in order to access, operate, maintain, inspect,and repair its sewer pumping stations,gravity sewer mains, and sewer force mains across all non-easement land managed by the United States Forest Service. -79- APPENDIX C Scope of Work Through this agreement,the Forest Service agrees to apply the Cost Recovery fees to cover the personnel costs associated with processing the application for South Tahoe Public Utility District's (STPUD)master sewer line permit renewal. The Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit will provide subject specialists(as defined in the attached Estimation Sheet)to prepare, review, and analyze environmental and other documents required for this application, in accordance with requirements for a categorical exclusion decision. If it is determined that the project does not qualify for a categorical exclusion, STPUD will be responsible for preparing the additional environmental documents. Forest Service specialists will be available to STPUD and its consultants for consultation on available resource data and known resource concerns. They will participate in field inspections and review project materials provided by STPUD to ensure they are consistent with appropriate regulations. The Forest Service will define requirements or mitigations that provide conformance with local management objectives and the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Land and Resource Management Plan. STPUD or its consultants will provide all materials necessary in order for the Forest Service to prepare the documents necessary for the application. These materials shall consist of, but are not limited to, maps,construction plans, timetables, pertinent documents from other regulating agencies,and other items deemed appropriate to process the application: -81- , , - 4j,pa'* .^:,...., * ''',.',..''' 'C'A.'''''' ''..4;4''', :''4*.*** .''•"P4:* .s.S.",'k''''' '`,.''A'i..4,:.'-z,,",V l....4•.!''`-!.'',t•'"j 1,.. '' ' „-•' , - + , %. „I.4 1.4:::,.., :' ' • : :'i, v.,4,,,,,,•P".;',-. -‘ - — _ .:.I',.>1., ” ,..,,,,..);‘,..,. ..4...7:•4, 49.b.i.,,„,,,, ,,,,.,,,,, v.,..,.'7 ' .w.,,..."-.•:1'• ,,,i-- ,azy.t.,--= , ‘-; :=;=4-4"...-'ii.-4',., l'A•a l''',!‘ ' k ,^' ' '!..r ' , ..:...:.-...4•re ' ,18., 1111,4::i ..'. . *.:,',:t4'1 „`:'M.'n.,S;s3° '4,J-k;;s:...<,.= ' . . .. r A ,',.. 1 ,,,,t'c., •„m' •' :..4 4 e' *r•, ,“.....,4 sz.N.C'!.,,,,;< ' ' 4 . . .= - 4,,,P,..1., ,, • •••4, -:- t-------- -- -- . „................. -- , I I • 1 — 1 _ ; 1 1 • i i 1 - -— . — Bob and Thompson,Ohs LWILDUFE BIOLOGIST r ;Review and Analysis _ . .. $1A87.00 — _ Zanotti,Shay _ . ' t , -1 , i Sub-Totals: 1 1 1,184 $414247.001 -- 1 . I Totals:i $48,247.00 Add Burdon Rat.: 7.1 % $3,425.54 I , Grand Totals: S51,672.54 • - - . . _ — 031 C...) I 1 Genera Manager Richatr!H.Solbrig • 1950 • tist South Tahoe Diractors Chris Cdalu - James R Jones 4 ` Public Utility District "aryLou Mmabatho.DAD Rise Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7b TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Airport Well Evaluation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Accept proposal from the selected consultant to provide engineering, well rehabilitation and well profiling services. DISCUSSION: The Airport Well has historically been an important source of water supply, capable of providing 1.2 million gallons per day (mgd) of drinking water to the District's main zone. Since its construction in 1978, incrustation and biofouling of well screens have reduced well efficiency resulting in declining well production to less than 1 mgd. In 2008, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) amended the District's domestic water supply permit changing the status of the Airport Well from an active source of water supply to a standby source of supply.The change in status was required due to the presence of arsenic slightly above the state and federal maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 parts per billion. Change to a designated standby source limits operation of this well only for short-term emergency uses. District staff believes that the Airport well is amenable to well rehabilitation and well modification methods that could restore lost drinking water production and reduce arsenic concentrations below MCLs, in a cost effective manner. The well evaluation would be used to collect the well profiling information needed for the identification and engineering design of appropriate well modifications. If successful, the District would be able to change the status of the Airport Well back to an active source, without the need for wellhead treatment. Funding for this well evaluation, provided by the El Dorado County Water Agency, requires that all work for the well evaluation is completed by June 30, 2011. On January 7, 2011, proposal requests were sent to seven (7) consulting firms with expertise in well evaluation and design. Three of the seven prospective consultants submitted proposals for District consideration. A summary of the proposals and staff's recommendation will be provided prior to, and at the Board meeting. -85- REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Airport Well Evaluation 1 INTRODUCTION The South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) is seeking proposals from qualified engineering firms to perform well rehabilitation followed by well profiling at the Airport Well, South Lake Tahoe, CA (Figure 1). The well rehabilitation will be used to restore well efficiency and normal flow conditions into the well. The well evaluation will be used to identify appropriate well modifications that can be constructed to reduce the mass loading of arsenic in the Airport Well, thereby eliminating the need for wellhead treatment. The selected consultant will be expected to: 1. Develop a work plan for well rehabilitation and well profiling evaluation to determine normal flow and water quality distribution through the Airport Well; 2. Complete well rehabilitation and well profiling in accordance with the approved work plan; 3. Prepare a technical report documenting the completed work; the findings of the well evaluation; and if feasible, recommended well modifications to reduce arsenic concentrations in the Airport Well; and 4. If warranted, develop technical specifications for construction of the recommended well modifications. 2 BACKGROUND The District operates the largest drinking water system in the Lake Tahoe Basin, providing potable water to more than 14,000 connections in the City of South Lake Tahoe and the adjoining communities' of Meyers/Tahoe Paradise in El Dorado County, CA. The District currently operates seventeen (17) active wells and two standby wells to meet the drinking water needs of its customers. In 2008, the California Department of Public Health amended the domestic water supply permit for the District changing the status of the Airport Well (PWS . 0910002-001)from an active source of supply to a standby source of supply. Change to a designated standby source allows the District to operate this well for short-term emergencies of five consecutive days or less and for less than a total of fifteen calendar days a year. The District requested this change in status as maximum contaminant level (MCL) exceedances in the Airport Well were less than ten times the established federal MCL for arsenic. -87- Request For Proposal 1/7/2011 Airport Well Evaluation Page 3 2.1 Airport Well The Airport Well is located on District property near the north end of the Lake Tahoe Airport(Figure 1). Access to the well is via a single lane paved roadway controlled by Lake Tahoe airport security. The well is housed in a 23' x 24' steel frame pump building. The Airport Well was completed in 1978 to a total depth of 380 feet (Figure 2). The nominal 12-inch diameter production well is constructed in a 17-inch borehole•with mild steel blank casing (0.375-inch wall) and wire-wrapped well screen (0.040-inch). The well includes three perforation intervals, screened from: 186 to 236 feet below ground surface (ft bgs); 266 to 281 ft bgs; and 316 to 366 ft bgs. A 51-foot nominal 18-inch conductor casing is used to seal the well to a depth of 50 ft bgs. The annular space surrounding the production well is gravel packed from ground surface to total depth. The well is equipped with a 125 hp Ingersoll-Dresser submersible well pumil and motor coupled to a nominal 5-inch column pipe. The pump intake is set at a depth of approximately 232 ft bgs. An exterior sounding tube was not constructed with the well. -89- Request For Proposal 1/7/2011 Airport Well Evaluation Page 5 Figure 3 is a production hydrograph for the Airport Well. This well historically has had a nominal capacity of approximately 1.2 million gallons per day(mgd). Over time the Airport Well has lost capacity, diminishing to less than 1 mgd by 2007. In 1999, plugged well screens were noted during visual well inspection at 231'; from 266' to 282'; and from 318' to 368'. Incrustation and biofouling of the well screens is believed to have resulted in reduced well efficiency and yield. The District has not performed any physical or chemical rehabilitation to restore lost production from this well. Productkut Itydrograph for Airport Well ,..'' r .?)South'Moe Public 1.afitr District 2,111 > - tie IC; t ; i l — • • 53,E ),.• • s I/ I I* : • 4 I 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Pigure 3. Airport Well Production Hydrograph (in mgd). -91- Request For Proposal 1/7/2011 Airport Well Evaluation Page 7 2. Work Plan: Complete a work plan for well rehabilitation followed by flow and water quality well profile evaluation. The work plan shall include: 2.1. A description of the method(s) proposed for well inspection; 2.2.Physical and chemical methods proposed for well rehabilitation; 2.3.Proposed methods for measurement of flow entry rates and the collection of depth-discrete water quality samples; 2.4.Technical specifications to be used by sub-contractors employed by the consultant to perform the well inspection, well rehabilitation, well profiling, well disinfection and laboratory services; 2.5.Proposed methods for the handling, temporary containment and disposal of all generated wastes; 2.6.Descriptions of calculations and methods of analysis that will be used for data evaluation, including determining the vertical mass loading of arsenic from contributing water zones; 2.7.Proposed schedule showing start and finish dates for each major work task; 2.8.Itemized budget, including all labor, material, tools and equipment, required to complete the work. The budget estimate shall be provided on a time and materials, not to exceed cost basis. 3. Well Evaluation: Complete the well inspection, well rehabilitation and well profile evaluation in accordance with the approved work plan using licensed sub-contractors retained by the consultant; 4. Technical Report Prepare a technical report describing: the well inspection, well rehabilitation and well profile evaluation work; summary of the well evaluation findings; and if warranted, recommended well modifications. All supporting documentation, including video well inspection reports, field records, photos, flow logs and laboratory reports shall be presented in appendices to the technical report; and 5. Technical Specifications: If warranted, prepare technical specifications to complete the recommended well modifications for construction bids. The technical specifications for the well modifications shall be provided as an appendix to the technical report. 4 DELIVERABLES At a minimum, the Consultant shall be required to provide the following deliverables for the AWAEP: 1. Well Performance Evaluation Work Plan including data collection and evaluation methods, specifications, proposed schedule and budget estimate; and 2. Well Performance Evaluation Report including work descriptions, evaluation findings, supporting documentation and specifications for recommended well modifications, if warranted. If technical specifications ' for well modifications are developed, the consultant shall provide the District with; -93- Request For Proposal 1/7/2011 Airport Well Evaluation Page 9 • Submittal Letter: Each proposal must be accompanied by a submittal letter. The submittal letter shall identify the name and title of the person authorized to contractually obligate the engineering firm for the purpose of this RFP and the person(s)to be contacted for clarification questions regarding the proposal. The submittal letter shall also include any exceptions taken to the District's Standard Consulting Agreement (see attached). • Firm Experience (no more than 2 pages): Include a general overview of your firm and the firm's experience by providing examples of highly successful aspects of projects similar to this project completed by the office submitting the proposal. Describe specific relevant experience of project team members and how that expertise will be utilized in this project. List at least three relevant public water supply well evaluation projects successfully completed by project team members over the past five years. • Firm's Approach (no more than 4 pages): Include a description of: the key project elements/goals and how the proposed approach will manage the project expertly and in an efficient manner. Identify challenges that might be expected and possible solutions to resolving those challenges within the time allotted in the project schedule. • Project Team (no more than 2 pages): Describe your project team, including title, office location and contact information. Include the key individuals and sub-consultants that will actually be responsible for conducting the project's technical activities and for management of the project. An organization chart should be provided showing the inter-relation of all the project team members, both District and Consultant. • Provide a table showing an initial estimate of the work-hour requirements anticipated for the project. The initial projection should be an itemized staffing breakdown in spreadsheet form, indicating personnel, title and estimated hours for each project team member on a per task and total project basis. Do not include any estimates of labor costs. • Provide a project schedule listing major tasks, deadlines, duration and projected start and finish dates for the project. • Appendix materials may be provided, but is not required other than specifically identified, in addition to the eight-page proposal limit. Appendix material may not be read and if submitted should be limited to resumes of proposed key staff relevant to the scope of work. 7 COST PROPOSAL The Technical Proposal and Cost Proposal must be submitted in two separate envelopes. The Cost Proposal shall include the following items for each of the major tasks and activities described in the accompanying Technical Proposal: -95- Request For Proposal 1/7/2011 Airport Well Evaluation Page 11 5. Proximity to or familiarity with the area in which the project is located (15 Points). 6. Proven expertise in completing successful well evaluation, well rehabilitation and well modification work that reflect modest design and economical cost for municipal water supply wells (15 Points). 10 SUBMITTALS Interested parties shall submit five (5) copies of their Technical Proposal and one (1) copy of their Cost Proposal to the District by no later than 5:00 p.m., Friday, February 4, 2011. Both the Technical Proposal and Cost Proposal shall be enclosed in a single sealed Submittal Envelope labeled "Airport Well Evaluation Proposal" and addressed as follows: South Tahoe Public Utility District Attention: Ivo Bergsohn 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 (530) 544-6474 Questions regarding this RFP shall be directed to Mr. Bergsohn by email (ibergsohnastoud.dst.ca.us). N:IProjects1WaterMAS Eval Airport WelllAsEval Airport RFP_v0.doc -97- SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT WELL EVALUATION POTENTIAL CONSULTANTS LIST . CONTACT FIRM MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP• PHONE FAX e-mail fit$ Ffesne_....---.___.6A------9 28-._.568.,448: --i 444423a-• Suite 101 Dig . - 3a Creek ,.q - - . •_ _ - . � Alu 89434 100 6..-4.7 - VISe Associates Hills e. GA--, . a,•.. g�:�97,- 9s1�C- 7,B-- joee}�eerm' .net rk Swanson, C.Hg. Farr West 5442 Longley Lane Reno NV 89511 775.851.4788 775.851.0766 kirkbfwenq.com Engineering ,,Xarry Ernst, C.Hg. Wood Rodgers 3301 C Street, Building Sacramento CA 95816 916.341.7447 916.341.7767 Iernstewoodrodoers.com k0 100-B ""homas W. Butler, C. Hg Stantec 3520 Brookside Road, Stockton CA 95219 209.242.0292 209.461.6444 thomas.butler@stantec.corn Suite 141 AWAEP.xls 1/12/2011 • Aci-ktiAi South Tahoe a-k�- 11 uhf ) Richard solbrig,c�ev�eral Mawaaer Peivy, Public Rtt,LLtlJi i I.StrI.Gt guard Mevrtibers Chris cefalu Javtes R._Jortes MAT Lou Mosbacher Dale Rise Eric Schafer Me MOM NZ(RM. Date: February 15, 2011 To: Board of Direct° R olbrig From: Ivo Bergsohn 01 Re: Airport Well Evaluation Project—Consultant Recommendation On January 7, 2011, staff solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) to provide engineering, well rehabilitation and well profiling services for evaluation of the District's Airport Well, South Lake Tahoe, CA. The RFP was solicited to seven (7) prospective engineering consulting firms and were received from 1) Farr West Engineering; 2)Wood Rodgers; and 3) Stantec Engineering. Submitted proposals were carefully reviewed and scored by District staff using the six criteria and point values listed on the RFP Evaluation and Selection Criteria worksheet. These criteria included: completeness; specialized design/technical competence; approach; capability; familiarity with the project area and efficiency. Following staff evaluation, reviewer scores were compiled and are presented on the RFP Scoring Summary. From the scoring summary, the proposals were rescored according to each . reviewers rank to provide a total score, provided in the RFP Rankings. On February 14th, review team members conferred to discuss the proposals. Review of the scoring summary and RFP rankings shows that the highest scores from the review team for all evaluation and selection criteria were awarded to the technical proposal submitted by Farr West Engineers (FWE). District staff recommends that the Board approve the selection of FWE for this project and accept the accompanying cost proposal to complete this work in the amount of eighty thousand dollars ($80,000). Attachments Cc: P.sci uto File South Tahoe Public Utility District•1275 Meadow Crest Drive,South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474•Facsimile 530.541.0614•www.stpud.us • SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT WELL ARSENIC EVALUATION PROJECT- RFP SCORING SUMMARY TOTAL CRITERIA SCORE FIRM 1 2 3 4 5 6 Farr West Engineering I I Reviewer 1 5 25 I 20 20 15 13 I 98 1 I Reviewer 2 3 23 18 17 15 14 I 90 I Reviewer 31 5 23 20 18 15 15 I 96 IReviewer 4 8 9 7 7 7 7 I 45 Reviewer 5 4 22 18 15 14 14 87 FWE Totals 25 102 83 77 66 63 329 JWood Rodgers 1 23 II 18 16 1 10 • 1 10 17 15 10 13 68 Reviewer 31 5 15 1 18 15 5 15 73 Reviewer 41 8 8 7 7 2 6 38 15 12 12 5 10 58 TotalsWR 71 72 54 252 Stantec LReviewer 1 5 I 24 1 18 18 14 10 89 I Reviewer 21 5 f 20 1 20 I 15 13 15 88 f Reviewer 3 5 18 1 20 16 7 15 81 Reviewer 4 7 8 7 6 3 7 38 Reviewer 5 4 18 15 12 10 7 Stantec Totals 26 88 80 67 47 54 296 AWAEP.xls 1 2/14/2011 I it At r,t I nL'iurrCi"r" Suir i an(rak tor. snub I do-I'tahiic I�filitx I)i.Ci icr I.�n an.xrn mutt\rlvrrr lshor� 1� x11rr lour �lar.rxtx \trp,ri�1cII I.xaht_rii<,u i'eoj.cf I'rnlccr I'ro�cer tiulr-lrrt.at lol;xl i1x Lr,�col, r ;,l's',,p,4 -.ill.- I,httiulrr{ tila r iecr Lnl!in.Yr I'rnrorl f .,, �,rt 1'omlf 1'aeiCu �ar.r.s I, ritiulr,:rx1,.,x IIxtdngc4,! :•t:f F.ui!c.f ,ttlx" 1 ai dix<)z,rLe:;l,r�nt r\ (1t 1 prr,.r. I t�n'.11. 'If,- Urn l Mlnrlx: AIil 'Ittxlxfct t, "uf rechxr. Iluueh R.rtx' �I1� slo, .M� S.ill �.'< �, "`J.° .n. �S l�r - ,"b»..-.N 'u . 1� k `'6s€ .S�'�k s a. r° § .,x a 4 Kickoff Meeting#1 8 S 95 • Data Review 6 12 - •`a" � � '�. Site Visit 8 8 _ Prepare Draft Work Plan 8 16 x Work Plan Review Meeting#2 8 8 S 115 Prepare Final Work Plan 16 6 20 • ti .tnm , * .. tea. -w m • k.b,'i � .'*. f j Coordination of Well Activities 8 4 24 4 � �� � _��_� M:�, , Removal of Pump/Pro-Well Inspection 4 8 S 165 $ 3,000 Well Rehabilitation 8 36 S 495 S 22,000 Post-Well Inspection 12 S 165 $ 1,000 . r Well Profiling Evaluation 6 32 $ 165 $ 4,000 $ 6,000 Well Pump Installation/Disinfection 4 12 S 165 $ 4,000- i . + � . , r+F�''rv'hk ri " :-.r "`: xf;' '4'''' +wr � f.ye ? ,g ,.5'--"�. .2" ,y .ori, a+ u: • .s '3 ,a ,_.,.•:, d.kr- . .,w,c«i, l �a<,.z r ."x :'... r 3� r'....''''e C€ �n,....ux. ;:."S;.Nw' ut.�`. " :.wt'•'- Data Compilation and Evaluation 16 32 Prepare Draft Report 16 4 24 4 • ; 7 " ., c-..,i+,-,..,.:- t, Project Report Review Meeting#3 8 S 95 Prepare Final Project Report 4 2 8 �' .; < n � •: � '° x a� , m�'°� ��s � �� ,�," ;yin. ..;:t.,,-.;:„*". .� < :#, r1 , „� � q e.are <''�' ,�'R� .„, :S. *.,..,.-!.....,....." .,..:1,,,„-4.3.z.,.• ;�Xf .' '`-tea.,,.;::.t.,,*" � ak 3; .-- ".trc 'r "; ':�w''w�`" M.4? 1 . xt ' „.,...i...-,-.. -4,,-,,,,,`'",fi 's K^t ``" `: :�. ;;4;‘,-;,,,,, t+" �,",;;� ' •', ;' 3 a,, ..�< ,.,, .. r 'Fr,x .�3.,«.:3t° .?'.."tp w a ,un, ., +'� .,.,. k :� x;w�'k $$E`4kiaa,��.� .sa.sv « ., PAYMENT OF CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL February 17, 2011 Payroll 2/8/2011 428,837.49 Total Payroll 428,837.49 ADP 398.37 American Express 196.70 Bank of America 0.00 BNY Mellon Trust Company 0.00 Brownstein/Hyatt/Farber/Schreck legal services 0.00 CDS-health care payments 177,844.45 Union Bank 0.00 Total Vendor EFT 178,439.52 Accounts Payable Checks-Sewer Fund 483,096.68 Accounts Payable Checks-Water Fund 161,840.68 Accounts Payable Checks-Self-funded Insurance 0.00 Accounts Payable Checks-Grants Fund 0.00 Total Accounts Payable 644,937.36 Grand Total 1,252,214.37 Payroll EFTS & Checks 2/8/2011 EFT AFLAC Medical & Dependent Care 634.53 EFT CA Employment Taxes & W/H 18,869.39 EFT Federal Employment Taxes & W/H 89,841 .36 EFT CaIPERS Contributions 71,687.86 EFT Great West Deferred Comp 19,475.08 EFT Stationary Engineers Union Dues 2,420.73 EFT United Way Contributions 134.00 EFT Employee Direct Deposits 217,590.42 CHK Employee Garnishments 1,389.22 CHK Employee Paychecks 6,794.90 Total 428,837.49 -ioi- PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vander Name Department/Proj Name Descriotio R Acct#/Proj Code Amount Check Num IyINg Check Total: 1.83730 AP-00078349 MW AT&T MOBILITY PUMPS TELEPHONE 1002-6310 19.80 AT&T MOBIUTY PUMPS TELEPHONE 2002-6310 19.79 Check Total: 3939 AP-00078350 MW AT&T/CALNET 2 GEN&ADMIN TELEPHONE 1000.6310 282.42 AT&TICALNET 2 GEN&ADMIN TELEPHONE 2000-6310 282.41 Check Total: 56433 AP-00078351 MW AVANCE,THERESA CUSTOMER SERVICE-WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038-6660-WCPROG 200.00 Check Total: 200.00 AP-00078352 MW AWARDS OF TAHOE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV&RCGNTN 1021-6621 5.00 AWARDS OF TAHOE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV&RCGNTN 2021-6621 5.00 Check Total: 10.00 AP-00078353 MW AWWA HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS 1022-4830 4925 AWWA HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS 2022-4830 49.25 1 Check Total: 98.50 AP-00078354 MW aBANK OF THE WEST GEN&ADMIN-WT METERING PRJ CONST RETAINAGE 2000-2605-METERS 1,252.74 to I Check Total: 1252,74 AP-00078355 MW BARTLETT,CLIFFORD W EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005-6011 124.50 BARTLETT,CLIFFORD W EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005-6011 124.50 Check Total: 249.00 AP-00078356 MW BAY AREA COATING CONSULTANTS ENGINEERING-FILTER ASSMNT REHAB FLTR 556 1029-8066-FILTER 3,645.00 Check Total: 3345.00 AP-00078357 MW BB&H BENEFIT DESIGNS HUMAN RESOURCES CONTRACT SERVICE 1022-4405 624.50 BB&H BENEFIT DESIGNS HUMAN RESOURCES CONTRACT SERVICE 2022-4405 624.50 Check Total: 1.249.00 AP-00078358 MW BENTLY AGROWDYNAMICS OPERATIONS SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1006.6652 4,058.16 Check Total: 4.058.18 AP-00078359 MW BI STATE PROPANE GEN&ADMIN PROPANE 1000-6360 48.28 RI STATE PROPANE PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002-6048 65.00 El STATE PROPANE HEAVY MAINT BUILDINGS 1004-6041 177.41 BI STATE PROPANE GEN&ADMIN PROPANE 2000-6360 48.27 User:THERESA Page: 2 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:O11,,PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS AIXISKAIIMS Department/Proj Name Description Acct#/Proi Code Amount Check Num Int CAPITOL WEBWORKS LLC DIO CONTRACT SERVICE 2027-4405 35.00 • Check Total: 70,00 AP-00078370 Mw CAROLLO ENGINEERS ENGINEERING-HEADWORKS HDWKS IMP PROJ 1029-8033-HDWORK 46,665.25 Check Total: 46.665.25 AP-00078371 MW CASHMAN EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005.6011 46.20 Check Total: 46,20 AP-00078372 MW COW-0 CORP INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPLIS 1037-4840 461.75 CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPLIS 2037-4840 1,091.75 Check Total: 1.553.50 AP-00078373 MW CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PUMPS REGLTRY OP PRMTS 2002-6650 1,640.00 Check Total: 1,540,00 AP-00078374 MW COCKING,DENNIS DIO TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2027-6200 448.00 Check Total: 448.00 AP-00078375 MW CWEA UNDERGROUND REP DUES/MEMB/CERT 1001-6250 71.00 CWEA UNDERGROUND REP DUES/MEMO/CERT 2001-6250 208.00 M+ N Check Total: 279.00 AP-00078376 MW 1 DELL MARKETING L P INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPUS 1037-4840 1,473.20 DELL MARKETING L P INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPUS 2037-4840 1,567.12 Check Total: 3.040.32 AP-00078377 MW DICK'S FULLER- PUMPS BUILDINGS 1002-6041 190.38 Check Total: 190.38 AP-00078378 MW OIONEX CORP LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007-4760 556,25 DIONEX CORP LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007-4760 564.39 ' Check Total: 1,120.64 AP-00078379 MW DIY HOME CENTER PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002-6073 7.09 DIY HOME CENTER HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPUES 1004-6071 30.24 DIY HOME CENTER HEAVY MAINT SMALL TOOLS 1004.6073 30.24 DIY HOME CENTER ENGINEERING SUPPUES 1029-6520 11.98 DIY HOME CENTER UNDERGROUND REP SMALL TOOLS 2001-6073 15.64 DIY HOME CENTER PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002-6051 75.07 DIY HOME CENTER PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002-6073 7.09 User:THERESA Page: 4 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Yandaatuna Department/Praj,Name Descry Accts{/Proj Code Amount Check Num Ina FAST FABRICATORS LLC PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002-6051 205.65 Check Total: 205.68 AP-00078390 MW FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY MONITORING 1007-6110 2,470.00 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY-ARHD3 TRTMT EXP MONITORING 2007-6110-AH3EXP 100.00 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY•BEACON CONTAM MONITORING 2007-6110-BEACON 100.00 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY•BKRFLD TRTMT EXP MONITORING 2007-6110-BKRFLD 200.00 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY-HERBST MONITORING 2007-6110-HERBST 100.00 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY MONITORING 2007-6110 100.00 Check Total: 3.070.00 AP-00078391 MW FISHER SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY LAB SUPPUES 1007-4760 1,035.14 FISHER SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007-4760 1,080.11 Check Total: 2.115.28 AP-00078392 MW FRONTIER DIAMOND VLY RNCH TELEPHONE 1028-6310 45.47 Check Total: 45.47 AP-00078393 MW GFS CHEMICAL LABORATORY LAB SUPPUES 1007-4760 56.65 I ©'GFS CHEMICAL LABORATORY LAB SUPPUES 2007-4760 58.20 v I Check Total: 114.85 AP-00078394 MW GRAINGER UNDERGROUND REP PIPE/CVRS/MHLS 1001•6052 323.97 GRAINGER PUMPS SAFETY/EQUIP/PHY 1002-6075 19.34 GRAINGER HEAVY MAINT PRIMARY EQUIP 1004-6021 99.39 GRAINGER HEAVY MAINT SECONDARY EQUIP 1004-6022 644.80 GRAINGER HEAVY MAINT BUILDINGS 1004-6041 29.88 GRAINGER HEAVY MAINT SAFETY/EQUIP/PHY 1004-6075 516.79 Check Total: 1.634.17 AP-00078395 MW GROVE MADSEN INDUSTRIES INC ELECTRICAL SHOP PRIMARY EQUIP 1003-6021 1,352.16 GROVE MADSEN INDUSTRIES INC ELECTRICAL SHOP PUMP STATIONS 1003-6051 1,262.71 GROVE MADSEN INDUSTRIES INC ELECTRICAL SHOP PUMP STATIONS 2003-6051 1,253.65 Check Tote!: 3.868.52 AP-00078396 MW H D R ENGINEERING INC FINANCE AD4ISORY 2039-4440 8,212.50 Check Total: 5.212.50 AP-00078397 MW HENDERSON,DEBBIE FINANCE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1039.6200 28.00 HENDERSON,DEBBIE FINANCE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2039-6200 28.00 User:THERESA Page: 6 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS vendor Nome Dertmant/Proi Noma Dnonation Accost I Prig Code Amount Check Num Ina LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LABORATORY SAFETYIEQUIP/PHY 1007-6075 132.56 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LABORATORY SAFETY/EQUIPIPHY 2007-6075 167.16 Check Total: 299.72 AP-00078410 MW LAKESIDE NAPA UNDERGROUND REP SHOP SUPPUES 1001-6071 256.56 LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS MOBILE EQUIP 1002-6012 6.73 LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002-6071 49.31 LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002-6073 189.12 LAKESIDE NAPA HEAVY MAINT PRIMARY EQUIP 1004-6021 4.93 LAKESIDE NAPA HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPUES 1004-6071 67.95 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005-6011 3,132.57 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP GENERATORS 1005-6013 278.37 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP SHOP SUPPUES 1005-6071 73.34 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP SMALL TOOLS 1005-6073 549.10 LAKESIDE NAPA DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS&MNTC 1028-6042 1.02 LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS MOBILE EQUIP 2002-6012 6.73 F,LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002-6051 12.70 wiLAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS SHOP SUPPUES 2002-6071 49.30 I LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002-6073 189.11 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005-6011 2,041.19 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR GENERATORS 2005-6013 565.32 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR SHOP SUPPUES 2005-6071 73.34 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 2005-6073 549.09 Check Total: 8.095.78 AP-00078411 MW UBERTY ENERGY GEN&ADMIN ELECTRICITY 1000-6330 84,744.14 UBERTY ENERGY GEN&ADMIN ST UGHTING EXP 1000-6740 1,527.65 UBERTY ENERGY GEN&ADMIN ELECTRICITY 2000-6330 13,059.34 Check Total: 99.331.13 AP-00078412 MW LILLY'S TIRE SERVICE INC. EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005-6011 1,885.77 ULLY'S TIRE SERVICE INC. EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005-6011 331.41 LILLY'S TIRE SERVICE INC. LABORATORY MONITORING 2007-6110 720.03 Check Total: 2.937.21 AP-00078413 MW LOOMIS FINANCE CONTRACT SERVICE 1039-4405 319.27 User:THERESA Page: 8 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Repeat:OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department/Proj Name DeacrlR1121 Acct#/Proi Code Amount Check Num T wat METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 1029-4820 191.96 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 2021-4820 12.07 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 2029-4820 191.94 Check Total: 461.24 AP-00078418 MW MD MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRICAL SHOP RADIO-RPRS/RPLCM 2003-6056 85.58 Check Total: 55,58 AP-00078419 MW NELS TAHOE HARDWARE PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 1002-6051 55.44 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002-6073 5.35 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004.6071 80,45 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005-6011 17.04 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE ADMINISTRATION SUPPLIES 1021-6520 25.00 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002.6073 5.35 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004-6041 98.79 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE ADMINISTRATION SUPPLIES 2021-6520 25.00 Check Total: 312.4; AP-00078420 MW NNETVAD INFORMATION SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1037-4820 212.07 r NETVAD INFORMATION SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 2037-4820 212.06 Check Total: 424.13 AP-00078421 MW NIXON'S HEATING HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004-6041 219.93 Check Total: Y19.93 AP-00078422 MW ONTRAC LABORATORY POSTAGE EXPENSES 1007-4810 26.50 ONTRAC LABORATORY POSTAGE EXPENSES 2007-4810 25.50 Check Total: 52.00 AP-00078423 MW OSBORNE,DIANE L CUSTOMER SERVICE-WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038-6660-WCPROG 200.00 Check Total: 200.00 AP-00078424 MW PAC MACHINE CO HEAVY MAINT SECONDARY EQUIP 1004-6022 334.73 Check Total: 334.73 AP-00078425 MW PDM STEEL HEAVY MAINT BIOSOL EQUPIBLDG 1004-6653 519.48 Check Total: 519.48 AP-00078426 MW PERKINELMER INC LABORATORY SFTWR,UMS 2007-8622 3,520.00 Check Total: 3.520.00 AP-00078427 MW User:THERESA Page: 10 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:OH..PMT_CLAIMS BK Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS • V.'P a Department/Proj Name Description Acct#!Proj Code Amount Check Num TYPI SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS BUILDINGS 1002-6041 2.66 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002-6048 10.11 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS SHOP SUPPUES 1002-6071 8.51 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002-6073 66.10 SCOTTYS HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005-6011 6.18 SCOTTYS HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REP SHOP SUPPUES 1005.6071 21.69 SCOTTYS HARDWARE DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS&MNTC 1028-6042 16,88 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002-6051 76.43 scorns HARDWARE PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002-6071 8.50 scorns HARDWARE PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002-6073 66.09 scorns HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REPAIR SHOP SUPPUES 2005-6071 21.69 Check Total: 304.84 AP-00078436 MW SHARP,KATHY ADMINISTRATION TRAVEIJMEETINGS 1021-6200 88.00 SHARP,KATHY ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2021-6200 88.00 Check Total: 176.00 AP-00078437 MW SHEPPARD MULUN HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL LEGAL 1022-4445 710.00 GSHEPPARD MUWN HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL LEGAL 2022-4445 710.00 Check Total: 1,420,00 AP-00078438 MW SHERIDAN,JOHN OPERATIONS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1006-6200 320.00 Check Total: 320.00 AP-00078439 MW SHIELDS HARPER&CO INC HEAVY MAINT GROUNDS&MNTC 1004-6042 1,674.28 Check Total: 1.674.28 AP-00078440 MW SIANO,CHRIS OPERATIONS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1006-6200 99.96 Check Total: 89,86 AP-00078441 MW SIERRA CHEMICAL CO OPERATIONS HYPOCHLORITE 1006-4755 4,359.31 SIERRA CHEMICAL CO PUMPS HYPOCHLORITE 2002-4755 673.29 Check Total: 5.032.60 AP-00078442 MW SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP 010-PR EXP-EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 1027-6620-PREEXT 405.00 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP FINANCE ADS/LGL NOTICES 1039-4930 902.49 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP DIO-PR EXP-EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 2027-6620-PREEXT 405.00 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP FINANCE ADS/LGL NOTICES 2039.4930 662.27 Check Total: 2.374.76 AP-00078443 MW User:THERESA Page: 12 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BIC Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department/Proj Name Deacriotion Acct#I Prof Coda Amount Check Num jyQg Check Total: 2.487.90 AP-00078452 MW TECHPRO SALES&SERVICE INC PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002-6051 751.65 Check Total: 751.65 AP-00078453 MW TOKAY SOFTWARE INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 1037-4405 400.00 TOKAY SOFTWARE INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 2037-4405 400.00 Check Total: 800.00 AP-00078454 MW U S BANK CORPORATE UNDERGROUND REP PIPE/CVRS/MHLS 1001-6052 • 10.00 U S BANK CORPORATE UNDERGROUND REP TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1001-6200 201.56 U S BANK CORPORATE PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002-6071 64.68 U S BANK CORPORATE ELECTRICAL SHOP TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1003-6200 63.47 U S BANK CORPORATE EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005.6011 7.50 U S BANK CORPORATE OPERATIONS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1008-6200 -300.00 U S BANK CORPORATE LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007-4760 15.97 U S BANK CORPORATE LABORATORY TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1007.6200 7.00 U S BANK CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION TRAVELIMEETINGS 1021-6200 422.50 � J S BANK CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV&RCGNTN 1021-6621 23.64 41J S BANK CORPORATE HUMAN RESOURCES SAFETY/EQUIP/PHY 1022-6075 12.73 U S BANK CORPORATE HUMAN RESOURCES SAFETY PROGRAMS 1022-6079 939.38 U S BANK CORPORATE HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL EXPENS 1022-6670 99.45 U S BANK CORPORATE DIO TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1027-6200 15.00 U S BANK CORPORATE DIAMOND VLY RNCH OFFICE SUPPLIES 1028-4820 92.38 U S BANK CORPORATE DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS&MNTC 1028-6042 88.80 U S BANK CORPORATE DIAMOND VLY RNCH TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1028-6200 663.60 U S BANK CORPORATE DIAMOND VLY RNCH TELEPHONE 1028-6310 59.99 U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING GASOLINE 1029-4610 75.00 U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1029-6200 13.00 U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING DUES/MEMB/CERT 1029-6250 71.00 U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING-CATHODIC ALL SYS CATH PROT 1029-8133-RUSTOP 304.42 U S BANK CORPORATE ENGINEERING•DVR IRRIG IMPRVS DVR IRR FLDS PHI 1029-8161-DVRIIP 1,519.37 U S BANK CORPORATE INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPLIS 1037.4840 29.83 U S BANK CORPORATE INFORMATION SYS TRAVEUMEETINGS 1037-6200 20.58 U S BANK CORPORATE CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1038-4820 44.14 User:THERESA Page: 14 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 11:45:23 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Y Nam Department!Proj Name Dnadvkan Acct#/Proj Code Amount Check Num Int WARD,FREDERICK GEN&ADMIN UB SUSPENSE 1000-2002 265.79 WARD,FREDERICK GEN&ADMIN UB SUSPENSE 2000-2002 291.32 Check Total: 557,11 AP-00078459 MW WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGY TRAINERS OPERATIONS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1006-6200 100.00 Check Total: 100.00 AP-00078460 MW WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION UNDERGROUND REP DUES/MEMB/CERT 1001-6250 220.00 • Check Total: 220.00 AP-00078461 MW WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SECONDARY EQUIP 1003-6022 1,086.99 WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP PUMP STATIONS 2003-6051 153.21 WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SHOP SUPPLIES 2003-6071 28.75 Check Total: 1.268.95 AP-00078462 MW WESTERN ENERGETIX INC GEN&ADMIN GASOLINE INV 1000-0415 3,188.02 WESTERN ENERGETIX INC GEN&ADMIN DIESEL INVENTORY 1000-0416 9,413.97 WESTERN ENERGETIX INC HEAVY MAINT PRIMARY EQUIP 1004-6021 224.30 WESTERN ENERGETIX INC EQUIPMENT REP OIL&LUBE 1005-4630 793.11 jNESTERN ENERGETIX INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR OIL&LUBE 2005-4630 793.11 v I Check Total: 14.410.51 AP-00078463 MW WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY MONITORING 1007-6110 520.00 Check Total: 520.00 AP-00078464 MW WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002-6071 145.98 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002-6073 -47.34 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY HEAVY MAINT SECONDARY EQUIP 1004-6022 11.04 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY GEN&ADMIN REPAIR CLMP INV 2000-0406 -247.11 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002-6051 233.33 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002-6071 145.97 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002-6073 -47.34 WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY CUSTOMER SERVICE ADD SENS HNDHLD 2038-8052 6,493.26 Check Total: 6.657,79 AP-00078465 MW WISE CONSULTING&TRAINING ENGINEERING-FILTER ASSMNT REHAB FLTR 5&6 1029.8066-FILTER 3,800.50 Check Total: 3.800.50 AP-00078466 MW User:THERESA Page: 16 Current Date: 02/10/2011 Report:OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 11:45:23 Scuth Mere J, 03,P.U.D. D, 4:28 FM -- 02/03 11 - VOID TYPED & A/P 1 --req: leg: CtiJIr-j.�oc: E---jap: 472306 *7328---wog: H000 <1.30>--report id: CKNIR Check Pam ID. Payee Name- Date Check .Amc nt Type Stabs Rel Tb Note AP00078241 V48176 @MERLCrNSZROCITCN 02/03/11 ==== ==== ------ 386,845.13 RV TR Revd GRAND TOTALS: Total. Void Nhine Written 0.00 Nitt of C17edcs Processed: 0 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total. Machine Written 0.00 Miter of Chedcs Processed: 0 Tbtal Hand Written 0.00 Number cf Checks Processed: 0 Total Revues 386,845.13 Nmber of Cid Processed: 1 rIbtal C"anoeiled 0.00 Number of C1Ecks Processed: 0 GRAND TOTAL 386,845.13 1 I-. .0 1 • General Manager Richard H.Solbt ig ,-�, South TOwls Wahl : � '" .. JDirectors ames R.Jones " '" ) Ful7lic Utility District , Maly " Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544 6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14a TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bradley Herrema, Legal Counsel MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: United States of America v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., et al., Civil Action No. 3:73-cv-00183-LGD, Subfile 3:73-cv-00207-LOG, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: I CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTT N: CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES , - - NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES :V NO -121- General Manager Richard H.Solbrig C 1a5o . w yout a oeanectoreChrisCefahr-= James R.Jonee Public Utility District Mary SchaferEric 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544--6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14b • TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Conference with Legal Counsel-Existing Litigation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government code, Closed Session may.be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: False Claims Act Case: United States, the States of California, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, and Tennessee and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia ex rel. John Hendrix v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A., Civil Action No. ED CV06-0055-GW, United States District Court for the Central District of California. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTT• : CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: ES 4°`'/ . NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES �41'� NO - 3- General Manager Richard H.5olbrig :-. i960 • W e4rSouth Pim-tors es R.Jonas " Ja ( .--1` ublic Utility District , ' ''�°"" PDale ItIsa Erie Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive•South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474•Fax 530 541-0614•www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14c TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig,General Manager MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Conference with Legal Counsel-Anticipated Litigation (one case) REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct legal counsel. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding anticipation of litigation. I SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO • CATEGORY: GENERAL MANAGER: YES -'`� NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO —125— General Manager Richard H.Solbrig Southoe torsChris Cefalu James R.Jones * 1\ -` • �"' • • • MaLou Mosbacher Public Ut(lit_y Districi+f y Dale Rise i.r Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Cmet PiivC •South Lake Tahoe•CA 96150 Phone 550 544-6474• Fax 530 541-0614 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14d TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: February 17, 2011 ITEM-PROJECT NAME: Conference with Labor Negotiators REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct negotiators DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54957.6(a) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held regarding contract negotiations. Agency Negotiators: Richard Solbrig/General Manager, Board of Directors Employee Organization:Stationary Engineers, Local 39 SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTT A CATEGORY: General GENERAL MANAGER: YES 7-yf/ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES to NO -127- C LJ-12 CoFPr4tJ. 2/17/2011 S h�1 � 4::) r-- Pacific West Communities, Inc. PACIFIC Pacific West Communities, Inc. o Developer and/ or Owner of over 80 affordable housing developments in 11 western states O Over 40 projects in California o Experience in unique mountain towns- Mammoth, Truckee, Jackson Hole o Proven track record in providing high quality and energy efficient developments, timely execution and community satisfaction o We Plan, Develop, Design, Construct, Own y.Mtea. PSC WEST 1 E s 1 2/17/2011 _141116‘ 4 i r .+� .. it b. Snow King, Jackson, WY 24-Unit Workforce Housing Community .c c a \ a • Expertise and Capacity ❑ Financing affordable workforce housing is our core strength contributing to successful partnerships with local, state and federal agencies. a Use local investment to maximize available resources:USDA, Private Equity,State Loans and Grants,Federal Resources o Staff expertise provide a breadth of knowledge and experience in each community we work with. a Land use,finance,construction,architecture,asset management and law PACIFIC weer 3 • 2/17/2011 The Aspens at South Lake o Unique Location D Within City Limits, RDA involvement D Multi Family Housing is an Allowable Use D The parcel was added to the Community Plan to facilitate deed restricted affordable housing by the City D Development incentives only apply to the parcel when deed restricted housing is proposed. D Proximity to amenities and services • Required for funding •Multiple Bus Routes&Stop • • Bijous Community Element. School-0.25 mile •Bijous Mini Park-0.3 mile •Latin Grocery Store-0.5 mil : •CVS Pharmacy-0.8 mile •Bank-0.8 mile •Safeway Supermarket-1.0 •Public Beach 1.0 •Various restaurants,shoppi services are nearby • Future Bicycle Trail-adjace 5 2/17/2011 Financing ��`'���'�e��ovh>a���,,a ..,. ��,\�;? 'a,�� 4.k' a * �„ o In order to compete in affordable housing finance we must remain flexible and creative o Low Income Housing Tax Credits primary source of equity. 0 4% with bonds versus 9% o Approximately $14.5 million in TDC o Combination of sources in an affordable deal 0 Soft public funds • Required to be below market, payments based on RR's (Revenues less operating) Our Request O Defer the water impact fees for the project • Estimated at $560,000 O The water fees will be paid back over time with Residual Receipts (Gross Revenues less Operating Expenses) O 0% Interest O First $10,000 in RRs paid to the PUD • After Perm Loan and before DDF, HOME, RDA O Letter commitment by March 11 7 2/17/2011 Benefit to the PUD ✓ New construction spurs the local economy D Sewer impact fees $580,000 paid ✓ Future Service Charges ■ (PUD estimates $25,000/year) ✓ Constraints of the parcel a Partner in the deal • � € •• fit.. • �-- .;., , Tile/Aspens at 5cauti Lake TMa}loe • a c1P __ .. ... »�....., .w ._u...� .z... .:. ..�w , ... .. ..a_....... ... a. mkt 9 2/17/2011 Thank You Shellan M. Rodriguez Project Manager LEED Green Associate Pacific West Communities, Inc. (208) 461 -0022 shellanr@tpchousing.com { 11 Ac (Rb South Tahoe -►�I - � F ,�+3 �� Richard sabrire, cet.eraL Mavoeer Publicl�tt%L%tl� Di,strizt goard members Chris c,ef L Javues R.Jovts Mari Lou Mosbacher Pa Le Rise Eric scha fer Mew.ora v&ol uvu. Date: February 15, 2011 To: Board of Director R Solbrig From: Ivo Bergsohn Re: Airport Well Evaluation Project— Consultant Recommendation On January 7, 2011, staff solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) to provide engineering, well rehabilitation and well profiling services for evaluation of the District's Airport Well, South Lake Tahoe, CA. The RFP was solicited to seven (7) prospective engineering consulting firms and were received from 1) Farr West Engineering; 2) Wood Rodgers; and 3) Stantec Engineering. Submitted proposals were carefully reviewed and scored by District staff using the six criteria and point values listed on the RFP Evaluation and Selection Criteria worksheet. These criteria included: completeness; specialized design/technical competence; approach; capability; familiarity with the project area and efficiency. Following staff evaluation, reviewer scores were compiled and are presented on the RFP Scoring Summary. From the scoring summary, the proposals were rescored according to each reviewer's rank to provide a total score, provided in the RFP Rankings. On February 14th, review team members conferred to discuss the proposals. Review of the scoring summary and RFP rankings shows that the highest scores from the review team for all evaluation and selection criteria were awarded to the technical proposal submitted by Farr West Engineers (FWE). District staff recommends that the Board approve the selection of FWE for this project and accept the accompanying cost proposal to complete this work in the amount of eighty thousand dollars ($80,000). Attachments ac: P. sciuto File South Tahoe Public Utility District• 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe,CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474•Facsimile 530.541.0614 •www.stpud.us I SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT WELL ARSENIC EVALUATION PROJECT - PROPSAL RANKINGS (1 =Low; 3= High) FIRM Farr West Engineering Wood Rodgers Stantec Reviewer 1 3 1 2 Reviewer 2 3 1 2 Reviewer 3 3 1 2 Reviewer 4 3 1.5 1.5 Reviewer 5 3 1 2 TOTAL SCORE 15 5.5 9.5 AWAEP.xls 1 2/14/2011 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT WELL ARSENIC EVALUATION PROJECT - RFP SCORING SUMMARY TOTAL CRITERIA SCORE FIRM 1 2 3 4 5 6 Farr West Engineering Reviewer 1 5 25 20 20 15 13 I 98 - Reviewer 2 3 23 18 17 15 14 I 90 Reviewer 3 5 23 20 18 15 15 I 96 Reviewer 4 8 9 7 7 7 7 I 45 Reviewer 5 4 22 18 15 14 14 87 FWE Totals 25 102 83 77 66 63 329 Wood Rodgers Reviewer 1 5 23 18 16 1 10 I 73 ' Reviewer 2 3 10 17 15 10 13 I 68 Reviewer 3 5 15 18 15 5 15 I 73 Reviewer 4 8 8 7 7 2 6 I 38 Reviewer 5 4 15 12 12 5 10 58 WR Totals 25 71 72 65 23 54 252 1 Stantec � Reviewer 1 5 24 18 18 14 10 I 89 Reviewer 2 5 20 20 15 13 15 I 88 Reviewer 3 5 18 20 16 7 15 I 81 Reviewer 4 7 8 7 6 3 7 I 38 Reviewer 5 4 18 15 12 10 7 66 Stantec Totals 26 88 80 67 47 54 296 AWAEP.xls 1 2/14/2011 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT WELL ARSENIC EVALUATION PROJECT - ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT : 2029-7089/AWAEPI RFP EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA Rank the proposals using the following criteria and enter your scores on the accompanying scoring sheet. CRITERIA DESCRIPTION POINTS COMPLETENESS: Rank the overall completeness of the submittal. Does it include all components requested in the RFP, including work scope, 1 three (3) relevant projects with references, project work-hour 5 requirenments, project schedule, project budget, resumes of key individuals. SPECIALIZED DESIGN/TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: Rank the project team in terms of professional qualifications/experience necessary to complete the project. Does the proposal provide specific examples of 2 relevant experience showing proficiency in well evaluation, rehabilitation 25 and well design appropriate for the project. Does the project team have the relevent professional credentials and level of experience required to perform the work? APPROACH: Rank the proposal in terms of offering unique approaches or key considerations to completing the project. Does the proposal show that 3 the project team has a full understanding of the project scope. Does the 20 proposal provide a clear plan to complete the project in a complete and cost effective manner. CAPACITY/CAPABILITY:Rank the the project team on its qualifications 4 and ability to provide specialized services needed to complete the project 20 as presented in the proposal. FAMILIARITY: Rank the project team in terms of its work experience in El 5 Dorado County and/or Lake Tahoe Basin. 15 APPROPRIATE EXPERTISE: Rank the proposal in providing examples of successful well evaluation, well rehabilitation and well modification projects 6 that were completed at the appropriate level for its intended use, in a 15 simple and cost effective manner appropriate for municipal water supply wells. TOTAL 100 AWAEP.xlsCriteria Farr West En2iueerintt Sub-Contractors South Tahoe Public t tility District Kirk Suansoo Kate A'elcon Zachary'Walter .Icon ilor•Qan 'Mohd :Airport Well l ablation Project Project Project j"eSub-total Sub-Dotal II}'dro eolo�ist' GIS Specialist Project Carson Pump Pacific Survey, Estimated Nauagrrl EngineerPro Farr W est Sub- IIsdrogcolii ist QA!t)t• Field Supervisor ticdrogenlorist Expense% Dan•Ilampe dike Ridder Cost Eutinccring Contractor, Hourly Rate SI l S105 S8; 590 1. AWAEP WORK PLAN Kickoff Meeting#1 8 --- $ 95 $ 1,015 $ - $ 1,015 Data Review 6 12 $ 1,710 IMMO $ 1,710 Site Visit 8 8 -- $ 1,600 $ - $ 1,600 Prepare Draft Work Plan 8 16 $ 2,280 1:111111 $ 2,280 Work Plan Review Meeting#2 8 8 $ 115 $ 1,715 $ - $ 1,715 Prepare Final Work Plan 16 6 20 $ 4,170 $ - $ 4,170 . AWAEP EVALUATION Task Total: $ 12,490 Coordination of Well Activities 8 4 24 4 $ 3,740 $ - $ 3,740 Removal of Pump/Pre-Well Inspection 4 8 $ 165 $ 1,305 $ 3,000- $ 3,000 $ 4,305 Well Rehabilitation 8 36 $ 495 $ 4,475 $ 22,000- $ 22,000 $ 26,475 Post-Well Inspection 12 $ 165 $ 1,185 $ 1,000- $ 1,000 Well Profiling Evaluation 6 32 $ 165 aillial $ 4,000 $ 6,000 $ 10,000 $ 13,575 Well Pump Installation/Disinfection 4 12 $ 165M' $ 4,000- $ 4,000 $ 5,645 3. AWAEP REPORT Task Total: $ 55,925 Data Compilation and Evaluation 16 32 $ 4,560 t $ 4,560 Prepare Draft Report 16 4 24 4 $ 4,660 $ - $ 4,660 Project Report Review Meeting#3 8 --- $ 95 $ 1,015 ' $ 1,015 Prepare Final Project Report 4 2 8 $ 1,350 $ - $ 1,350 Total Hours ME 16 252 8 Task Total: $ 11,585 Total Cost $ 14,720 $ 1,680 $ 21,420 $ 720 S 1,460 $ 40,000 $ 34,000 $ 6,000 $ 40,000 $ 80,000 ID ' ;Task Name Duration . Start Finish March 'May 6 • __ __2/6_- ___ 2/13 2/20_.__ _227 ___ 3/6___ __3/13 -3/20___ ' 3/27 4/3 4/10 4/174/24 5/1 5/8 5/15 5/22 529 6/5 1 .. - AWAEP Engineering Services RFP 1 day Thu 2/17/11 Thu 2/17/11 —- - ------ _. ..... _- - .. 2 ` Engineering Board Award 1 day Thu 2/17/11 Thu 2/17/11 ♦2/1 3 AWAEP WORKPLAN 34 days Tue 2/22/11 Fri 4/8/11 4 Kickoff Meeting#1 1 day Tue 2/22/11 Tue 2/22/11 ......... ...... 5 Initial Site Walk 1 day Wed 2/23/11 Wed 2/23/11 6 Data Review 2 days Thu 2/24/11 Fri 2/25/11 Eit 7 Site Specific 2 days Thu 2/24/11 Fri 2/25/11 e Initial Review 1 day Thu 2/24/11 Thu 2/24/11 9 Local Area 1 day Fri 2/25/11 Fri 2/25/11 10 Initial Review 1 day Fn 2/25/11 En 2/25/11 LJ..... 11... 3 Work Plan Development 5 days Mon 2/28/11 En 3/4/11• --'—T�...... 12 °3 Work Plan Discussions with Distract 1 day Mon 3/7/11 Mon 3/7/11ik 13 °3 Work Plan Submittal-Draft 1 day Tue 3/22/11 Tue 322/11' 14 Work Plan Review-District 5 days Wed 3/23/11 Tue 329/11 ___'/, 15 Work Plan Review Meeting#2 1 day Wed 3/30/11 Wed 3/30/11 4p.3/30 16 Work Plan Submittal-Final 7 days Thu 3/31/11 Fn 4/8/11 -----17 AWAEP EVALUATION 16 days Mon 4/11/11 Mon 5/2/11 18 ,3 Coordinahon/Mobilizahon 4 days Mon 4/11/11 Thu 4/14/11 i ---1. 19 Well Pump Removal 0 5 days Fn 4/15/11 Fn 4/15/11 i 20 ,er Pre-Rehabilitation Well Inspection 0 5 days Fn 4/15/11 Fn 4/15/11 r 21 Well Rehabilitation 2.5 days Mon 4/18/11 Wed 4/26/11 22 Brushing and Chemical Treatment 0 5 days Mon 4/18/11 Mon 4/18/11 �}., 23 3 Straddle Packer Pump Development 0 5 days Tue 4/19/11 Tue 4/19/11 "� 24 i'a Fluid Containment and Disposal 0.5 days Tue 4/19/11 Tue 4/19/11 25 'a Discrete Interval Sampling with Pump 0 5 days Wed 4/20/11 Wed 4/20/11 .................... Well Profiling Evaluation 4 days Fri 4/22111 Wed 4/27/11 27 0 Down hole Flow Survey 1 day Fri 422/11 Fri 4/22/11 , 28 Discrete Interval Sampling 0.5 days Mon 4/25/11 Mon 4/25/11 I I 29 Submittal of Samples(1 week turn) 0 5 days Mon 4/25/11 Mon 425/11 I! 30 Fluid Containment and Disposal 0.5 days Tue 4/26/11 Tue 426/11 II 31 I,'aa' Post-Rehabilitation Well Inspection 1 day Tue 4/26/11 Wed 427/11 • ■ 32 ,yr Well Pump installation 0 5 days Wed 4/27/11 Wed 4/27/11 33 Wall Disinfection 3 days Thu 4/28/11 Mon 5/2/11 34 ,ryaj� Post Rehabilitation Well Testing 3 days Thu 4/28/11 Mon 52/11 C I] 35 • AWAEP REPORT 21 days Tue 5/3/11 Tue 5/31/11 36 1n Data Compilation 8 Evaluation 4 days Tue 5/3/11 Fri 5/6/11 ' 37 Determmtlon of MassContrlbuhons 0 5 days Mon 5/9/11 Mon 5/9/11li 38 as Report Preparation 2 days Mon 5/9/11 Wed 5/11/11 • 39 Work Plan Discussions with District 1 day Wed 5/11/11 Thu 5/12/11 _......4...__... 40 .f3 Project Report Submittal Draft 1 day Thu 5/1211 Fri 5/13/11 • 41 Project Report Review-District 7 days Fri 5/13/11 Tue 5/24/11 — • 42 Project Report Review Meeting#3 1 day Tue 5/24/11 Wed 5/25/11 ,• 43 Project Report Submittal-Final 3 days Wed 5/25111 Mon 5/30/11 44 - Tech Specifications 01 warranted) 3 days Wed 5/25/11 Mon 5/30/11 45 1a 0.5 days Tue 5/31/11 Tue 5/31/11 ♦5/31 Task Progress Summary External Tasks - Deadline Project STPUD airport well schedule __............__.... Date Mon 214/11 SplitMilestone ♦ Project Summary 1.01011110001111. External Milestone 4100. Farr West Engineering 12 5442 Lonylc5 Kane,Situg,B.Reno,NV 89511 felephone 77i_N51-4700 Ins 775-811-inlxr