Loading...
AP 04-21-11 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:00 P.M. District Board Room 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, California Richard Solbri • , General Mana . er Paul Sciuto, Assistant General Mana • er Dale Rise, President BOARD MEMBERS Mary Lou Mosbacher, Vice President James R. Jones, Director Eric W. Schafer, Director Chris Cefalu, Director 1. ALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board on short non - agenda items that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the District. Five minute limit. No action can be taken on matters not listed on the agenda.) 3. CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR 4. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR (Any item can be removed to be discussed and considered separately upon request. Comments and questions from members of the public, staff or Board can be taken when the comment does not necessitate separate action.) 5. CONSENT SEPARATE O FORWARD BROUGHT ITEMS BR F FOR RATE DISCUSSION / ACTION O O A 6. ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION REQUESTED BOARD ACTION a. Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Hold a Public Meeting to Receive Pg. 45 (John Thiel) Comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact b. Recycled Water Facilities Master Plan Hold a Public Meeting to Receive Pg. 49 (Ivo Bergsohn) Comments on the Draft Supple- mental Environmental Impact Report c. Alpine County Groundwater Monitoring Award Contract to the Lowest Pg. 51 Well Installation Responsive, Responsible Bidder ( *Bid (Ivo Bergsohn) results and staff recommendation will be distributed prior to, and at the Board meeting) d. Payment of Claims Approve Payment in the Amount of Pg. 53 $3,073,470.67 REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - APRIL 21, 2011 PAGE - 2 7. BOARD MEMBER STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) a. Water & Wastewater Operations Committee (Jones / Rise) 8. BOARD MEMBER AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) a. Legal Service Providers Ad Hoc Committee (Rise /Cefalu) 9. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR REPRESENTATIVES REPORT 10. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) 11. GENERAL MANAGER REPORT(S) (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) 12. STAFF / ATTORNEY REPORT(S) (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) a. Capacity Charge Increase Postponement (Paul Hughes) b. Ethics Training for Designated Filers of the Conflict of Interest Form 700 (Kathy Sharp) 13. NOTICE OF PAST AND FUTURE MEETINGS / EVENTS Past Meetings / Events 04/13/11 - El Dorado County Water Agency Board Meeting 04/18/11 - Water and Wastewater Operations Committee Meeting 04/21/11 - Health Improvement 2 Quarter Kick -off & Blood Draw Future Meetings / Events 04/27/11 - 8:00 a.m. - ECC (Employee Communications Committee Meeting) at District (President Rise is Board representative) 04/28/11 - 8:00 a.m. - Health Improvement 2 Quarter Group Follow -Up at District 05/02/11 - 3:30 p.m. - Water and Wastewater Operations Committee Meeting at District 05/03/11 - 9:00 a.m. - Alpine County Supervisors Regular Board Meeting in Markleeville 05/04/11 - 10:00 a.m. - El Dorado County Water Agency Board Meeting in Shingle Springs 05/05/11 - 1:00 p.m. - Urban Water Management Plan Board Workshop at District 05/05/11 - 2:00 p.m. - STPUD Regular Board Meeting 05/05/11 - 6:00 p.m. - Public Meeting re: Budget at District 14. CLOSED SESSION (The Board will adjourn to Closed Session to discuss items identified below. Closed Session is not open to the public; however, an opportunity will be provided at this time if members of the public would like to comment on any item listed. Three minute limit.) a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) /Conference with Legal Counsel Pg. 71 Existing Litigation re: False Claims Act Case: United States, the States of California, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, and Tennessee and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia ex rel. John Hendrix v. J -M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A., Civil Action No. ED CV06- 0055 -GW, United States District Court for the Central District of California b. Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(c) /Conference with Legal Counsel Pg. 73 Anticipated Litigation: (One Case) REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - APRIL 21, 2011 PAGE - 3 15. ACTION / REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION 16. ADJOURNMENT (To the next regular meeting, May 5, 2011, 2:00 p.m.) The South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month. A complete agenda packet, including all backup information is available for review at the meeting and at the District office during the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A recording of the meeting is retained for 30 days after minutes of the meeting have been approved. Items on this agenda are numbered for identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the order in which they appear on the agenda. Designated times are for particular items only. Public Hearings will not be called to order prior to the time specified, but may occur slightly later than the specified time. Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the agenda will be taken at the same time the agenda items are heard; comments should be brief and directed to the specifics of the item being considered. Comments on items not on the agenda can be heard during "Comments from the Audience;" however, action cannot be taken on items not on the agenda. Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all written material presented at the meeting. 'Backup to any agenda item(s) not included with the Board packet will be made available when finalized at the District office, at the Board meeting, and upon request to the Clerk of the Board. The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate participation of the disabled in all of the District's public meetings. If particular accommodations for the disabled are needed i.e., disability- related aids, or other services), please contact the Clerk of the Board at 530.544.6474, extension 6203, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. c j 11 t.1�flu# 1/4 1; li 1ilii ;- CONSENT CALENDAR APRIL 21, 2011 ITEMS REQUESTED ACTION a. Temporary Help for Information Systems Approve Contract with Substitute Pg. 1 Department Personnel or Blue Ribbon for a (Carol Swain) Temporary Special Projects Technician, in the Estimated Amount of $24,000 b. Engineering Temporary Help Approve Extending the Contract of Pg. 3 (Heidi Baugh) a Temporary Employee Through September 2011, from Substitute Personnel & Business Services, in an Amount Not to Exceed $15,000 c. Organ Transplant Policy Approve Increasing the Maximum Pg. 5 (Nancy Hussmann, Paul Hughes) Benefit for Organ Transplant Cover- age to an Unlimited Maximum, for an Additional Annual Premium of $1,932 d. Diamond Valley Ranch Wastewater Irrigation Adopt Resolution No. 2889 -11 Pg. 9 Improvements Regarding the Application/Authori- (Lynn Nolan) zation /Reimbursement /Dedicated Source of Revenue, Approving PP 9 Loan Application to the State Water Resources Control Board State Revolving Loan Funds e. 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline Waive Minor Bid Irregularities; and Y 1 () 9 - Pg. 15 (Peter Lavallee) (2) Award Bid to the Lowest Responsive, Responsible Bidder, Burdick Excavating Company, Inc., in the Amount of $1,110,275 f. Sewer Line Patch Repair (1) Find Minor Deviation in the Lowest Pg. 25 (Doug Van Gorden) Bid to be Immaterial and Waive Deviation as Such; and (2) Award Bid to the Lowest Responsive, Respon- sible Bidder, Hoffman Southwest Corp., in the Amount of $62,456 CONSENT CALENDAR - APRIL 21, 2011 PAGE - 2 g. Cold Creek Filter Plan SEZ Restoration Project (1) Find that Ecocrete is the Sole Pg. 29 (Julie Ryan) Manufacturer of Porous Concrete Mixture that has the Required Durability for the Project; and (2) Designate Ecocrete to Admixture as the Sole Porous Concrete Admixture that may be Use in the Project, Without Alternative h. Cold Creek Filter Plant and Ralph Tank SEZ Authorize Staff to Advertise for Bids Pg. 33 Restoration (Julie Ryan) i. Hydro Truck Bid (1) Reject all Bids; and (2) Authorize Pg. 35 (Randy Curtis) Staff to Advertise for Bids for a Sewer Cleaning Truck and Machine South Tahoe Public Utility District • 1274 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474 • Facsimile 530.541.0614 • www.stpud.us Genersd M:rtaaer Rblmrd K So brig ' , � South Th Directors Public JAMS R. Jonas , Mary Lou Mosbadow Ut its/ District Dila Klee Ede Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4a TO: Board of Directors FROM: Carol Swain, Information Systems Manager MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Temporary Help for Information Systems Department REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve contract with Substitute Personnel or Blue Ribbon for a temporary special projects technician, in the estimated amount of $24,000. DISCUSSION: This position would assist the Information Systems Department, working on technical projects such as creating records in the Laserfiche application, assist with PC surplus procedures, updating software inventory compliance database, and other special projects as required. This employee would work a minimum of 16 hours per week, not to exceed 999 hours within the new fiscal year. SCHEDULE: Jul 1, - S y , 2011 June 30, 2012 COSTS: Estimated cost of $24,400 ACCOUNT NO: 1037 -4405, 2037 -4405 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $16,700, $16,700 ATTACHMENTS: None CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO� CATEGORY: Sewer S. Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES f"0 NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES :il NO -1- GPI Manager Richard Sabrlg • South Tahoe DI:voters .Chris Wale Public Utility District , `"aiyLou °r Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4b TO: Board of Directors FROM: Heidi C. Baugh, Contracts Administrator MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Engineering Temporary Help REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve extending the contract of a temporary employee through September 2011, from Substitute Personnel & Business Services, in an amount not to exceed $15,000. DISCUSSION: This temporary employee is being used for transcribing field reports produced by the inspectors on the various projects under construction by the District. The temporary employee is also assisting in the scanning of project files into the District's Laserfiche database. There are numerous reports which take approximately four hours a day to transcribe, as well as the scanning work to be done. SCHEDULE: COSTS: Not to exceed $15,000 ACCOUNT NO: 1029 -4405, 2029 -4405 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $22,223; $25,915 ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTI • • CATEGORY: Sewer & Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES 6, NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES Ali' NO -3- General Manager Richard Ft Solk * . � -. S outh Oliwctors Chris Car* ( itt• ! r " �!w �� J aniceJCJonas f u Dale \ bliG Utility District , Mary '"" Eric Schafer 1Z /b Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe. CA 96154 -7401 Phone 530 544.6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4c TO: Board of Directors FROM: Nancy Hussmann, Paul Hughes MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Organ Transplant Policy REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve increasing the Maximum Benefit for Organ Transplant Coverage to an Unlimited Maximum, for an additional annual premium of $1,932. DISCUSSION: Recently the actual policies for the Organ Transplant "carved -out" policy of the Districts Medical Plan were distributed. It was noticed that there was a $1 million cap on benefits payable under this policy, although the District was under the impression that it was a $1 million limit. Currently, in the District's self- insured health plan, there is unlimited health coverage for organ transplants. After the first $75,000 Specific Deductible, the District's Stop Loss policy would cover the next $1 million in benefits, P Y $ . and if that cap is reached, then the District would be fully self - insured for anything over $1 million. BB &H Benefit Designs researched the possibility of having an unlimited benefit under the new Organ Transplant Policy. It would cost an additional $1,932 per year ($21,232 total per year) for this unlimited maximum benefit, and the District would not have to pay for any expenses over $75,000. The current total annual premium for the $1 million cap P $ P $ P coverage is $19,300. With the Unlimited Benefit Coverage, the total annual premium would be $21,232 (an additional $1,932 per year). In December, when the Organ Transplant Policy was approved by the Board as part of the Self- Insured Plan renewal, the District was unaware that there was a $1 million cap on the benefits. By approving this consent agenda item, the District will be maintaining benefits at the current level for applicable employees, without being liable for unfunded benefit coverage over $1 million. • —5— Nancy Hussmann April 21, 2011 Page 2 SCHEDULE: 4/22 - Notify BB&H Benefit Designs of upgraded policy COSTS: An additional $1,932 /year ACCOUNT NO: Various BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: Funded with the annual health insurance contribution ATTACHMENTS: Transplant Coverage Comparison Chart CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO, . CATEGORY: General GENERAL MANAGER: YES ,!i' NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES C. • _6 NO 9 South Tahoe Public Utility District Transplant Coverage Altemative Maximum Levels - Premiums rs ,ir 'nt (•2 f . Jt 1 ' i.(>iltldct 1 ?''I;ii'st !rclitmld?fi Specific Stop Loss Level $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Lifetime Maximum Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Transplant Benefit $1 million $2 million Unlimited Premiums Single 18 $120.88 $121.39 $121.52 Family 101 $276.53 $277.71 $278.01 Monthly Cost $30,105.37 $30,233.73 $30,266.37 Annual Cost $361,264.44 $362,804.76 $363,196.44 s n;f( ,r r t in -- c' c, > 00 r` - _ 0 T , -7- General Manager Richard It Solbrig S outh / .. , „t - "•a..ti..� J ams Owls CORN R Joins I/ Public c Ut ty District NIS Mu 1275 Meadow Crest Drive* South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4d TO: Board of Directors FROM: Lynn Nolan, Grants Coordinator MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Diamond Valley Ranch Wastewater Irrigation Improvements REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2889 -11 regarding the Application/ Authorization /Reimbursement /Dedicated Source of Revenue, approving loan application to the State Water Resources Control Board State Revolving Loan Funds. DISCUSSION: The District applied for and received State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) State Revolving Loan Funds (SRF) in 2009. At that time, the above listed project was presented as two separate projects ( Effluent C -Line Reroute and Irrigation Fields Phase 1). During the loan process, SWRCB requested that the two projects be combined as they were not completely functional projects on their own. A revised application is necessary to approve the combination of the two projects into a single project. As part of the application revision, a new Board resolution is necessary. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: Estimated project cost is $5,600,000 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2889 -11 CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO -9- 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2889-11 2 APPLICATION /AUTHORIZATION /REIMBURSEMENT/ DEDICATED SOURCE OF REVENUE 3 RESOLUTION 4 5 APPLICATION /AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RESOLUTION 6 BE IT RESOLVED by the South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD) Board of Directors 7 that the General Manager, Assistant General Manager and /or the Chief Financial 8 Officer is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of the 9 STPUD, a Financial Assistance Application for a financing agreement from the State 10 Water Resources Control Board for the planning, design, and construction of the 11 following sewer project: 12 Diamond Valley Ranch Wastewater Irrigation Improvements (combination of two 13 approved projects: Effluent C Line Rerouting and Irrigation Fields Phase 1) and 14 BE IT RESOLVED that the STPUD hereby agrees and further does authorize the 15 aforementioned representative or his /her designee to certify that the Agency has and 16 will comply with all applicable state and federal statutory and regulatory requirements 17 related to any financing or financial assistance received from the State Water 18 Resources Control Board; and 19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager, Assistant General Manager 20 and /or the Chief Financial Officer or his /her designee of the STPUD is hereby authorized 21 to negotiate and execute a financial assistance agreement from the State Water 22 Resources Control Board and any change or chap a orders thereto and certify 23 financing agreement disbursements on behalf of the STPUD. 24 25 REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION 26 WHEREAS, the STPUD (the "Agency ") desires to finance the costs of constructing 27 and /or reconstructing certain public facilities and improvements relating to its water 28 and wastewater system, including certain treatment facilities, pipelines and other 29 infrastructure (the 'Project "); and 30 -11- i 1 WHEREAS, the Agency intends to finance the construction and /or reconstruction of 2 the Project or portions of the Project with moneys ("Project Funds ") provided by the 3 State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board 4 (State Water Board); and 5 WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the 6 sale of obligations the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal 7 income tax purposes (the "Obligations "), and 8 WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by the State 9 Water Board of the Project Funds the Agency desires to incur certain capital 10 expenditures (the "Expenditures ") with respect to the Project from available moneys of 11 the Agency; and 12 WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that those moneys to be advanced on and 13 after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period 14 and it is necessary to reimburse the Agency for the Expenditures from the proceeds of 15 the Obligations. 16 NOW, THEREFORE, THE AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, 17 ORDER AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 18 SECTION 1. The Agency hereby states its intention and reasonably expects to 19 reimburse Expenditures paid prior to the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by 20 the State Water Board of the Project Funds. 21 SECTION 2. The reasonably expected maximum principal amount of the 22 Project Funds is $ 20 Million Dollars. 23 SECTION 3. This resolution is being adopted no later than 60 days after the date 24 on which the Agency will expend moneys for the portion of the Project costs to be 25 reimbursed with Project Funds. 26 SECTION 4. Each Agency expenditure will be of a type properly chargeable to 27 a capital account under general federal income tax principles. 28 SECTION 5. To the best of our knowledge, this Agency is not aware of the 29 previous adoption of official intents by the Agency that have been made as a matter 30 -12- 1 of course for the purpose of reimbursing expenditures and for which tax- exempt 2 obligations have not been issued. 3 SECTION 6. This resolution is adopted as official intent of the Agency in order to 4 comply with Treasury Regulation § 1.150 -2 and any other regulations of the Internal 5 Revenue Service relating to the qualification for reimbursement of Project costs. 6 SECTION 7. All the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct and this 7 Agency so finds, determines and represents. 8 DEDICATED SOURCE OF REVENUE RESOLUTION 9 The STPUD hereby dedicates the following source of revenue: user charges and 10 capacity charges, to payment of any and all Clean Water State Revolving Fund 11 financing on the following projects: Diamond Valley Ranch Wastewater Irrigation 12 Improvements (combination of two approved projects: Effluent C Line Rerouting and 13 Irrigation Fields Phase 1). 14 This dedicated source of revenue shall remain in effect throughout the term of such 15 financing unless a modification or change of such dedication is approved in writing by 16 the State Water Resources Control Board. 17 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing 18 Resolution was duly adopted and passed by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District at a regularly scheduled meeting held on the 21st day of April, 2011, 19 by the following vote: 20 21 AYES: 22 NOES: 23 ABSENT: 24 25 Dale Rise, Board President 26 South Tahoe Public Utility District 27 28 ATTEST: 29 30 Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board -13- General Manager Molyard k Sdbrig arectors ( ( _ ; . � - :. ./ S outh Ta .a� Jan+o6RJones Public Utility District Maly Lou Meekodwir Dike Mee s, , Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4e TO: Board of Directors FROM: Peter Lavallee, Assistant Engineer MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Waive minor bid irregularities; and (2) Award bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Burdick Excavating Company, Inc., in the amount of $1,110,275. DISCUSSION: On April 6, 2011, at 3 pm, the District received six (6) bids for the 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline Project. Bids ranged from $1,110,275 to $1,793,443. The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $1,371,838.20. The work included in this contract primarily includes installation of 12 inch waterlines on Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 12 inch I suction and discharge waterlines to the proposed Grizzly Mountain Booster Station. As indicated in the attached summary by the Contracts Administrator, the apparent low bid was received from Burdick Excavating Co., Inc. The bid contained only a few minor irregularities. The US Forest Service is administrating the grant for this project. Therefore, the project is subject to federal guidelines for contracting. Any work that is procured using federal funds for construction, equipment, services and supplies is subject to the requirement for outreach to DBEs. Staff has performed a review of Burdick's "good- faith" effort and has found one minor irregularities, but Burdick has generally complied with the requirements of Section 00 74 00, Part 2.10 of the Bid Documents (DBE Requirements). This single irregularity was caused by a change in the bid date after submittal of the DBE advertisement by Burdick and does not affect their good faith effort. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: $1,110,275 ACCOUNT NO: 2029 -8229 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $1,200,000 ATTACHMENTS: Bid Summary — 15— Peter Lavallee April 21, 2011 Page 2 CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO • CATEGORY: Wafer GENERAL MANAGER: YES . NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO -16- South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Telephone: (530)544 -6474 Fax: (530)541 -4319 Memorandum Date: April 6, 2011 To: Board Members, Richard H. So!brig, Paul A. Sciuto From: Heidi C. Baugh, Contracts Administrator Subject: 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline Project At 3:00 o'clock on the afternoon of April 6, 2011 we received and opened six (6) sealed bids for the above - referenced t 7 44 pro�ec . Bids ranged from $1,110,275 to $1, 93 . , 3 The engineers estimate was 1 71 analysis of the three 838.20. A careful review and anal s o ee lowest bids showed only inor deviations. See attached spreadsheet and list of Y P deviations for full breakdown of each bid. Burdick Excavating Co., Inc. is the apparent low bidder. Burdick Excavating Co., Inc. had only minor deviations. I contacted the Contractors License Board and was iven the following information: 9 9 License Number 476659 is current and active and expires 07/31/2011. The company is a corporation. Burdick Excavating Co., Inc. holds a Class A — General Engineering license. co: Liwda F�roww Pete Laval-Lee South Tahoe Public Utility District • 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474 -.]Fit ssimile 530.541.0614 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline Project Bid Opening: 4/6/2011 at 3:00 o'clock p.m. Deviations and information • athered durin . bid anal sis of the three lowest bids: Burdick Excavating Co., Inc.: • Bidder's General Information Items 1 and 2, Address and phone number of company did not match that posted on State Contractor's License Board. Burdick indicated that the application for change was submitted to the State about a year ago. • Bidder's General Information, Item 5, name, address and phone number of surety not provided. Broker agent, company, address and phone number provided. • Bidder's General Information Item 7, List of projects of similar size: "see attached resume" was inserted. I was not able to locate the resume. Burdick did provide said resume upon request. Campbell Construction Co., Inc. • Bidder's General Information Item 5, phone number for surety not provided. All other information was provided. White Rock Construction: • Bidder's General Information, Item 5, did not provide name, address or phone number for surety, only for agent/broker. • On the Bid Forms, contractor did not insert "subtotals". -18- 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline Project CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS Burdick Excavatinilnc. Description of Work Subcontractors Name & Address AC Paving 13.4% W. Coast Asphalt Maintenance Co. P.O. Box 19102 Reno, NV 89511 #794105 Named Equipment/Material Supplier List: Equipment/Material Supplier Aggregate Base Material Tahoe Asphalt Asphalt mixes for paved areas Tahoe Asphalt Pipe material / Supplier Western Nevada Supply Fittings and Specials Westem Nevada Supply Valves and valve boxes Western Nevada Supply Campbell Construction Description of Work Subcontractors & Address Paving 12% W. Coast Asphalt Maintenance Co. P.O. Box 19102 Reno, NV 89511 #794105 Revegetation 1% Kelley Erosion Control 2395 B Tampa Street Reno, NV 89512 #703012 Named Equipment/Material Supplier List: Equipment/Material Supplier Aggregate Base material Bing SLT Asphalt mixes for paved areas Tahoe Asphalt Pipe material / Supplier Groeniger Co. Fittings and Specials Groeniger Co. Valves and valve boxes Groeniger Co. White Rock Construction Description of Work Subcontractors & Address Asphalt Paving 11.5% W. Coast Asphalt Maintenance Co. P.O. Box 19102 Reno, NV 89511 #794105 Traffic Control .27% Force Traffic Control P.O. Box 1107 Exeter, CA 93221 #790502 -11- 2011 Grizzly Mountain Waterline Project CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS Revegetation .18% V &C Construction 1219 Service Drive, Ste. H Gardnerville, NV 89410 #645708 Equipment/Material Supplier List Equipment/Material Supplier Aggregate Base material Bing Materials Asphalt mixes for paved areas Tahoe Asphalt Pipe material / Supplier Westem Nevada Supply Fittings and Specials Westem Nevada Supply Valves and valve boxes Westem Nevada Supply 1 1 1 -20 , SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICTS 2211.11111MLIMMAninagalag BID SUMMARY (04/062011) iSM K " IMIIRx ''" . RI, , it *r0" _ it • .. ,. f seg. " `' 3 " 1 BR iF ',d i R. . : ''1.118 I,t_ r, nv , . . ' _ma �•ilS#E ., - .. -110 tv- � ' .� � ', . a< LI " ev }a� "c Vii• -x `� ° `' ° NIMIMPIM MriVAINOINEW - r �' -'? .+ ,.«a tisit.': ��F. ' .t : . .a ,: <: j'11�.�'�t'""s . . - ' ms s ' * : :' +:;; fi1R� t i1;..al "'4 ' 6: . "'• EP MoblDemab 10% © 108 061.20E 106 061.20 120 000.001E 1 • 000.00 (E.' 000.00 E" 000.00 E 000.00 ' 3 000.00 11 E 7 700.00 , • 000.00 000 . 00 E •' 1169.00 E7 !J © GL w [_* 615 000.00 615 000.00 13 • •.00 613 500.00 12 500.00 12 500. • • : 000.00 . 000.00 96 000.00 • 000.00 630 000.00 630 000.00 633 000.00 Yom., 000.00 1111 ©.1 75 ....00 5 • • . 00 30 000... 8 - . .. 50000 • • ... : - 000... 000.00 < - 000.00 635 000.00 - • 000.00 • • 000.00 • 000... • • • •.00 - safe per OSHA IS District L 111 510 000.00 610 000.00 7 500.00 67 500.00 612 000.00 12 000.00 000.00 56 000.00 510 500.00 10 500.00 55 000.00 • 000.00 ' 500.00 500.00 © traffic control measures. ®m 675 000.00 $75 000.00 43 500.00 $43 500.00 1 500.00 .1 500.00 : 000.00 • 000.00 644 000.00 644 000.00 820 000.00 620 000.00 898 000.00 898 000.00 ll Punish a8 labor and equipment for wee of project area, staging area and vacant lot Id'd on plans 525 000.00 625 00000 3 850.00 850.00 15 500.00 15 50000 500.00 500.00 • 000.00 55 00000 518 000.00 518 000.00 3 00000 000.00 � • . . p � !e , ^ Y } •+ f �Pif@'�Ci� 1 r� Y ,�. �� iR �r _ _ - .. � .. � , i S' _ .. . :� II Provide and Install 12 Inch PVC Ill 0900, hrsible PVC 6900, CeAa- • PVC C-900 or TMrabMe PVC C-000 DR18 Water Main. ,= : • • • • : + + 7250 "73 065.00 •. • .00 • • 101.00 -19 7 ..00 02.00 -" •• .00 138.00 710148.00 132.00 79 72.00 II Provide and CWs350 12 Inch Di MIN . so . •.00_ •.00_M_ $0.00 60.00 • •.00 Il Provide and install concrete - encasement of new 1' Water I N Mein in a single trench at storm 140 drain and sanitary sewer t•1 545.00 . 300.00 28.00 $3 640.00 -.00 57 840.00 •.00 84 200.00 822.00 S3 080.00 • .00 54 200.00 552.00 7 80.00 I I Provide and install concrete II encasement of new 12" Water Mains in a dual pipe tren at storm drain and sanitary newer - -.00 400.00 52.00 64160.00 688.00 7 040.00 660.00 800.00 527.00 180.00 650.00 - 000.00 5100.00 88 000.00 Provide and Install concrete encasement of new 12' Wrier Main In a triple pips trench at storm drain and sanitary sewer 20 -.00 1 300.00 + •- : : + • . + + " -+ • + + - + + + 1 800.00 _• • • " • 00 5100.00 " 000.00 170.L. 400.00 Provide and kleta8 idles quarter © © 1 950.00 900.00. 100.00 1 850.00 x 700.00 1 100.00 • ..00 200.00 E 500.00 000.00 " 500.00 • 000.00 ends (3/41 sepals water service. 10 • - • - 111110 " 200.00 513 200.00 2 600.00 15 600.00 + 500.00 815 000.00 81 800.00 810 800.00 82 800.00 816 800.00 83 300.00 819 800.00 82 600.00 815 600.00 ` 8750.00 000.00 950.00 800.00 • •.00 " 600... • • •.00 82 400.00 1 000.00 54 000.00 51800.00 $7 200.00 1 830 • • 7 400... 11 • - existing three-quarter Inch (3/41 water services lo lot by removing valve risers and boles. 750.00 " •.00 585.00 1 755.00 1000.00 000.00 100.00 • •.00 . •.00 81 800.00 - •.00 1500.00 5850,00 52 550.00 ® Station 1+00 Ikarde [J 820 000.00 E . 000.00 14 800.00 E 14 800.00 517 300.00 Eluz:• •.J E 18 300.00 18 300.00 000.00 523 000.00 "' 000.0011111Vo •�;]• - 110000011. , 3000 .00 ® Stedon 4+52 Werth, ©jam 15 000.00 1 000.00 13 500.00 13 500.00 Njk,k 7 E a•�i ) 17 300.00 E 17 300.00 " .000.00 "" 000.00 0 000.00 520 000.00 " 000.00 "7 000.00 ® Staton 7 +72 Wert* ©IIMI E =' 76 IEiA2' 1 28 500.00E " 500.00 800.00 E_• 600.00 111F=11111 - 300.001 ».. 111E 7I . 000.00 x . 000.00 • 00000 E. 000.00 RP Station 29+30 Startle ME Mil E • 000.00 BE . • • •, 3100.00 E 100.00 Mite::' iE= IEEFA ' iL q IEEE= IlE2 ' El 11111 ' - 000.00 0 000. • • Iffpg.MIIMIEUEM SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICTS 911 GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN WATF_RLINg BID SUMMARY (04106/2011) :!°,' 7.- ' ;: r,, . .. T, ' ';,,+2 �{, .., ... .. ; Al. . .'I -,. :. -' � :.' .. a :.,. ,a. `. y ` ! �',t� y , .�W lilt ...1., . � � 'a~,- � .A. aa�,y�� - �}v'�( �s� . � . + [:..' y�� s.. - . ,�"� n K'. 41i ". ;5'� . •1 '. MINV.i}..£; _ "' fir:,, ., rf - 1 11111x" 'HIN% 4..w'l� VW' -r. P ia '���.'11oRn_ /? ��'� .f A29 , {, , :aAp/{�1t,J....'4/.sa_::iwit ;lY! 17 Mt. Ranbr Station 1+00IMertie LS 1 810,' h ..00 510,0 11,300.00 11,300.00 $13,000.00 813,000.00 14,800.00 14,800.00 19,300.00 519,300.00 518,000.00 518,000.00 517,000.00 $17,000.00 18 Discharge Station 1.00lntertle LS 1 510,000.00 510,000.00 9,200.00 $9,200.00 510000.00 $10,000.00 512,800.00 $12,800.00 $19,000.00 519,000.00 512,000.00 $12,000.00 515,500.00 515,500.00 19 Sbe Piping Intertie LS 1 57,500.00 $7,500.00 5,700.00 55,700,00 58,800.00 $8,600.00 56,800.00 $6,800.00 $13,000.00 $13, 000.00 83, 000.00 53,000.00 $8,700.00 88,700.00 Demolish existing underground 20 • . reducing valve station LS 1 , $5, 000.00 $5, 000.00 950.00 5950.00 52,850.00 82 ,850.00 53,500.00 53,500.00 $4, 000.00 54, 000.00 54, 000.00 54,000.00 $2,900.00 52,900.00 Provide and instal Fire Hydrant 21 Assembly complete and in 9lace. LS 5 55,500.00 $27,500.00 6, 000.00 530,000.00 $5,950.00 529,750.00 57,200.00 $36,000.00 57, 400.00 537,000.00 $8,500.00 $42,500.00 57,700.00 538,500.00 Provide and irutall Fire Hydrant Assembly with Inane 12 -Inch gate 22 valve complete and in place. EA 1 57,500.00 $7,500.00 9,850.00 59,850.00 59,350.00 $9,350.00 512,400,00 812,400.00 512,000.00 512,000.00 512,000.00 512,000.00 512,900.00 $12,000.00 Cut, cap and abandon existing 23 Fire Hydrant. EA 3 81,000.00 53,000.00 1,150.00 $3,450.00 51,550.00 $4,650.00 51,100.00 $3,300.00 5700.00 52,100.00 $1,500.00 84,500.00 81,000.00 $3,000.00 Cut, cap and abandon exisWp 24 water mains. EA 15 51,000.00 515,000.00 875.00 513,125.00 51,600.00 524,000.00 $800.00 812,000.00 5700.00 510,500.00 5800.00 $12,000.00 51,000.00 515,000.00 Replace concrete rood curb and 25 ,putter to match existing. LF 80 $60.00 $4,800.00 60.00 $4, 800.00 525.00 52,000.00, $50.00 54,000.00 520.00 51,600.00 565.00 $5,200.00 870.00 55,600.00 Provide and install one inch (1') thick trench patch pavement 26a restoration SF 17,793 52.00 $35,586.00 1.25 $22,241.25 $1.50 526,689.50 51.50 526,689.50 52.20 539 ,144.60 $2.50 544,482.50 $4.00 571,172.00 Provide and loan two Inch (21 deep mill and two inch (2") pavement restoration overlay wthin the El Dorado Co. right-of- 26b way. SF 46,144 $2.50 5115,360.00 2.25 5103,824.00 52.40 5110,745.60 82.80 8119,974.40 52.54 $117,205.76 $3.00 5138,432.00. $2.50 5115,3130.00 Provide and [naiad concrete cutoff wets along waterline 27 algmnent EA 3 52,000.00 56,000.00 500.00 51 ,500.00 $850.00 82,550.00 $450.00 51,350.00 $1,000.00 *3.00.00, $400.00 51,200.00 $350.00 51,050.00 Provide, install and demolish stations assembly, valve, pip excavation and I 28connsctbns EA 10 $2,000.00 520,000.00 1,900.00 519,000.00 82, 100.00 $21,000.00 52,400.00 524 000.00 $1,500.00 515,000.00 51,100.00 511,000.00 $2,200.00 $22,000.00 N PART 1 SUBTOTAL: 1 1 . 673.20 5920 149.25 '' 421.10 1 ■ 50.90 81 120 .36 81 162.50 81 ■ . ■ N 7�" . .,_, y .-ter 1� �0� 1 4 1"` r r - :: 4 ,„, ,.... '--",' „ - - !---; '' ''!' : ; : f ." ''' '''''';': '- ' Illit'i'll': Provide end Install 12 inch PVC - .... -. - .- •- ' . ' . C900. fusible PVC C-900, Certa- Lok PVC 0.900 or Terrabnde 29a PVC C-900 (DR18) Water Main. LF 1,240 596.00 5119,040.00 89.25 5110,870.00 591.00 5112,840.00 5110.00 5136,400.00 5115.00 8142.600.00 8140.00 5173.600•00 5140.00 8113,600.00 Provide and Install 12 Inch DIP 29a Clefs 350) Water Main. LF 1, 240 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 •.00 and install concrete cutoff walls along waterline 280 alignment EA 2 $2,000.00 54,000,00 500.00 51,000.00 $850.00 81,700.00 $450.00 $900.00 51,000.00 52,000.00 5450.00 5900.00 8360.00 5720.00 Provide and install concrete encasement of new 12" Water Mains at storm drain and sanitary 29e sewer LF 80 54500 52 700.00 26.00 51 560.00 556.00 53 360.00 530.00 51 80000 22.00 51 320.00 860.00 $3 600.00 560.00 $3 600.00 Provide and i ste812 inch v - -. . - h,E� r'; _. , ';- Fusible PVC 0900 (DRIB) Water 29d Main. LE 1,240 80.00 $0.00 80.00 $0.00 80.00 50.00 $0.00 Provide and install 12 Inch Carta - 29d Lok C900/RJ (DR18) Water Mach LF 1,240 50.00 $0.00 50.00. 80.00 50.00 50.00 80.00 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT'S 2011 6EIITh Y W 1MTAW W& T I E BID SUMMARY (O4/OW2011) 30 et 3 M© 1 960.00 1 560.00 100.. • 1 850.00 700,00 1000.00 000.00 ° ...00 400.00 82 600.00 200.00 7 500.00 • 000.00 ® y 111© 750.00 1 500.00 950.00 1 900.00 x • •.00 1 300.00 - .00 1 100.00 800.00 800.00 1 800.00 800.00 81 850.00 _,700.00 101 ©J 10 ""'.001E10 000.00 11 500.00 11 500.00 14 000.00 � " ' 15 500.00 15 500.00E 0 1l1Wii �' ] Ea" '�'.. ' '7E7 +�� ' 'x' �1 1 569.60 Provide end install termorary r El overland water service to 1402 and 1414 North Upper Truckee Drive. MI 000.00 000.00 3 800.00 800.00 1 350.00 31 350... 000.00 000.00 37 000.00 7 000... 310 000.00 10 000.00 . 000.00 • • • • ' © . - �© 500.00 11 000.00 6 000.00 12 000.00 . 150.00 812 300.00 7 •'.00 $14400.00 87 400.00 14 800.00 $8 500.00 $17 000.00 $8 ...00 316 400.00 © _ 111111 37 500.00 57 600.00 9 850.00 .. 850.00 $9 500.00 $9 500.00 81 500.00 12 500.00 12 000.00 $12 000.00 15 000.00 315 000.00 12 000.00 1 000.00 P (© 1 000.00 000.00 1 150.00 300.00 1 300.00 800.00 1 100.00 $2 ''.00 700.00 1 400.00 '.00 1 600.00 1 100.00 ...00 ®wa/ermahs.atwdonsxistlrW Rill. 9700.00 1000.00 675.00 75.00 31600.00 1 600.0 0 1100.00 31100.00 700.00 9700.0 3800.00 5800.00 1500,00 81500,00 1. ... �• ®� r.•31,..! 52.00 � ` +I;�mow �' , NSF: @QR,r,6 < . , ,sJ54 �'� K.A' ;x� --fir; c,.,`�?c'�: 370.00 1.25 MEN 87 323.75 1.50 $6 277.50 $9 207.00 32.50 310 462.50 34.00 16 740.00 Provide and insta8 r deep mill and r pavement restoration ® 10 882 52.50 52715500 2.25 4 439.50 v .50 7155.00 .60 328 41.20 9 327 589.48 52.80 $30 413.60 ., . 870.50 overlay within El Dorado Co. right of wa . 1 .fie... •r*^, 7 04 1 4113.303 3 . 'A• v ,. .',, ' . a sN*, in �' ate. -mv, �ti . li® '.00 $000 $0.00 ^ '.00 •.00 '.00 I deep rnill N and IN �� . .00 00 wBNn Et Dorado Co. rig ��dS 3 ■ 0 imisimm 32 000.00 +• 000.00 1 900.00 51 900.00 $2 100.00 $2 100.00 Y 400.00 + 400.00 ■ ..00 $1 000.00 1 000.00 100.00 1 - = E � �E '7R71F.1 E %?1rST1i7�7�E± ���� L � '7f'7 1110 5.00 E3RIrf'TxTl -E1E.L 1LLJ E T' �T -ry•111111111111[I1=C'7111 3 • Gene Manager Richard H. Sant Directors j Chris CLOW ✓ . r � ,. t i J ames R, Jones Public Unlit District ` "''Mo°" Eric Dale Rise Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 • Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4f TO: Board of Directors FROM: Doug Van Gorden, Underground Repair Sewer Supervisor MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Sewer Line Patch Repair REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Find minor deviation in the lowest bid to be immaterial and waive deviation as such; (2) Award bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Hoffman Southwest Corp., in the amount of $62,456. DISCUSSION: Bids were opened from four bidders for sewer line patch repair services. Hoffman Southwest Corp. was the low bid with one minor deviation. The bid excluded price proposal for 1 foot cut -only item. See bid results for further explanation. Line repairs will be done using the ultra - violet cure in place system liner system. The District's Purchasing Agent has reviewed this item. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: $62,456 ACCOUNT NO: 1001 - 6055 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $93,449 ATTACHMENTS: Bid Results CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION. CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES I: NO -25- SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT BID RESULTS BID # 10 -11 -05 OPENING DATE April 12, 2011 FOR Sewerline Spot Repair Services Estimated Costs (based on list of 54) Hoffman SW Corp dba Pro Pipe $ 62,456.00 Via UV cure Deviation: Excluded price proposal for 1 foot cut -only item (Hoffman will assist the District with the cut, but wanted to avoid the expense of bringing their "cutting" truck up from Southem Calfomia for this one repair Other bidder's prices range from $1524 - $12,507.16 for this item) ABC Service 88,597.00 Via ambient cure National Plant Services Inc 127,040.00 Via full -wrap ambient cure Veolia ES Industrial Srvs Inc /Pacific Uners 684,227.45 Exception: Via steam cure Disclaimer. The total dollar amounts are based upon expected repair sites and their estimated s The bidder's contract total may vary, but unit /size prices are firm. -27- General Manager Ric hard H. Solbdg 950 • S outh T aroctors Chris Cefidu x ri��� t•> J arne6 RJones Public Utility District Mary Lou Moobadter Dab Klee EriSchafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4g TO: Board of Directors FROM: Julie Ryan, Senior Engineer MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Cold Creek Filter Plant SEZ Restoration Project REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Find that Ecocreto is the sole manufacturer of porous concrete admixture that has the required durability for the Project; and (2) Designate Ecocreto admixture as the sole porous concrete admixture that may be used in the Project, without alternative. DISCUSSION: To comply with requirements of the Public Contracting Code, the District must list in one place in the bid documents all items that are to be provided by the contractor without alternative (ie., sole- sourced), and identify the basis for including each item on the list (also known as a "finding "). This list must be approved in advance of bidding by the Board of Directors. A single item will be required without alternative for this project: Ecocreto Admixture Type 1 for porous concrete paving. As a condition of the funding, the existing alsphaltic pavement at the Cold Creek Filter Plant must be replaced with a porous alternative pavement and must be maintained by the District for 20 years. Porous pavement is a relatively new product, with a limited performance history in cold climates. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, the project designer, has determined that Ecocreto is the sole manufacturer of porous concrete admixture that has demonstrated the required durability for a project constructed in the local climate and conditions. Staff requests that the Board approve this item for the purpose of bidding and constructing this project. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: 2029 -8745 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $786,967 ATTACHMENT& List of Sole - Source Items for the Cold Creek Filter Plant SEZ Restoration Project. —29— Julie Ryan April 21, 2011 Page 2 1 I 1 CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION / CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES -,-,. NO /74, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES 4 NO - 0- A. In following with the District's established Purchasing Policy, and as is allowed by the public code (PUC §3400, PUC 15431 and PCC 20206.1) and supported by case law, the District has made findings that certain products shall be used for this project without alternative. The District's Purchasing Policy recognizes the following as Findings for exceptions to bidding. 1. When the item (merchandise or service) can be obtained from only one source. 2. When the item is required or is economically preferable to match or be compatible with other furnishings, materials or equipment presently on hand and the purchase is made from the manufacturer or supplier who supplied other such furnishings, materials or equipment. 3. When the item has been standardized by the District and can be purchased from only one source or is purchased from the original manufacturer or supplier. 4. When the Board of Directors determines that due to special circumstances, it is in the District's best interest to purchase an item or enter into a contract without compliance with the bidding procedures ie. competitive proposals would not be useful, would not produce an advantage or would be undesirable, impractical, or impossible. 5. When all bids are considered unsatisfactory or excessive and are rejected by the Board of Directors by a two-thirds vote (PCC 20206.1), the District may do any necessary work and make necessary expenditures in lieu of contracting for the proposed work. 6. When the Board of Directors declares an emergency by a four - fifths vote (PCC 22050), after finding that conditions will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids. All actions thereafter taken will be reported to the Board until the emergency action is terminated (at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant). B. Following is a list of sole- sourced products that has been approved in advance by the District's Board of Directors, and the basis for the sole - source determination identified by reference to the findings listed in Part 2.04.B (above). 1. Ecocreto Admixture Type 1 [Finding 4] -31- Gemmel Manager Riettard H. Solbig • 950 • gie South Ta hoe Dam-tors Jame* ft Jones . * ✓� Pul7lic Utility District . Mary Loa Mostachar Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544- 6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4h TO: Board of Directors FROM: Julie Ryan, Senior Engineer MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Cold Creek Filter Plant and Ralph Tank SEZ Restoration REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize staff to advertise for bids. DISCUSSION: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC) and District staff are working to finalize the bid documents for the Cold Creek Fitter Plant and Ralph Tank SEZ Restoration Project. The project includes demolition of obsolete facilities and site improvements in and around stream environment zones at these two District facilities. Pending timely completion of the bid documents, staff proposes the following schedule for the bid period and construction: Board Authorize to Bid April 21, 2011 Advertise April 27, 2011 Mandatory Pre -Bid May 12, 2011 Bid Opening • May 26, 2011 Board Approval June 2, 2011 Notice to Proceed July 1, 2011 Contractor Mobilization August 1, 2011 Project Complete October 15, 2011 The cost to construct the project is expected to be approximately $720,000 based on the final estimate provided by NHC. This project is funded in part by the US Forest Service in conformance with the Environmental Improvement Program. SCHEDULE: See above COSTS: $720,000 ACCOUNT NO: 2029 - 8745 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $786,967 ATTACHMENTS: None -33- Julie Ryan April 21, 2011 Page 2 i CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES _ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO -34- General Maraseer Maul ed k Solb ig / Directors S outh Ta James R. Jones Public U nity District Mary Lou Mostsocher Digs kiss Eric Schatiw 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • wwwstpuctus BOARD AGENDA ITEM 41 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Randy Curtis, Manager of Field Operations MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Hydro Truck Bid REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: (1) Reject all bids; and (2) Authorize staff to advertise for bids for a sewer cleaning truck and machine. DISCUSSION: Bids were opened March 22, 2011. Based on the bids the District received, it is clear that the District's specifications should be revised in order to ensure that bidders would be supplying a product that serves the District's purposes. Staff recommends that the Board exercise its power to reject all bids and allow staff to re- work the minimum specifications to request a vehicle that will provide the mobility, horse power requirements, and on board enclosed equipment protection the department will require to provide year round sewer tine maintenance. Staff will then advertise for bids that will meet the revised specifications. The District's Purchasing Agent has reviewed this item. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: 1005 - 8106 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $186,000 ATTACHMENTS: Hydro Specifications CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES fir NO -35- SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT HYDRO TRUCK BID RESULTS BID # 10 -11-08 OPENING DATE March 22, 2011 BID AMOUNT TRADE -IN TOTAL Municipal Maintenance Equip Inc $ 186,350.88 - $ 8,000 $178,350.88 2012 Freightliner M2 106 conventional chassis Pipe Hunter 16HD26TM 180 Day Delivery dependent on chassis, Net 30 days 12 month full parts & labor warranty, major components warranted by manufacturers, 5 year on water tank Exceptions: 250 hp engine - min. specs = 300 hp Truck USA domiciled "excluding California" 3 -T Equipment Company 188,388.92 - 10,000 178,388.92 2012 International 7400 -SBA 4x2 Super Products CJ- 1665 /20- PTH -MD 120 -180 Day Delivery, Net 45 days 12 month full parts & labor warranty Excepfion: Water pump powered off transmission PTO not engine powered as required in specs Owen Equipment Sales 180,594.60 - 2,000 178,594.60 2012 International 7300 4x2 chassis Vactor P -Series Jetter 180 -210 Day Delivery, Net 10 days 12 month full parts & labor warranty, manufacturers warranty only on jetting equipment Excepfion: 245 hp engine - min. specs = 300 hp Jack Doheny Companies 203,575.65 - 15,000 188,575.65 2011 Internations chassis 2011 Sewer Equip of America 800HPR 120- 180 Day Delivery 12 month full parts & labor warranty, 7 year on water tank Exceptions: Vehicle Specs not received Jack Doheny Companies 205,537.50 - 15,000 190,537.50 Alternate: 2011 Peterbilt chassis 2011 Sewer Equip of America 800HPR 120 -180 Day Delivery 12 month full parts & labor warranty, 7 year on water tank Exceptions: Vehicle Specs not received SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS HYDRO TRUCK GENERAL It is the intent of these specifications to describe the minimum requirements for a high pressure hydraulic cleaner designed to use high velocity water jets to remove obstructions, soluble grease, sand, and other materials from sanitary sewer pipe drains and other conduits. The unit, including all necessary equipment, shall be furnished complete and ready for use. All parts not specifically mentioned which are required for a complete unit shall conform in design, strength, quality of material and workmanship to the highest standards of engineering practice. The sewer cleaning machine shall be the manufacturer standard. It shall be equipped with the manufacturer equipment and accessories which are included as standard in the advertised and published literature for the unit. No such item of equipment or accessories shall be removed or omitted for the reason that it was not specified in the bid. Standard product items may be removed only where it is necessary to install other items in lieu thereof in order to comply with these specifications. Vehicle to meet all State of California and Federal regulations when in operable condition. This is to include all fuel tanks filled, water tanks filled, and any other accessory equipment which may be used on this vehicle. Delivery of vehicle will be to the South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD), it will then be weighed in a fully operable condition. Acceptance of vehicle by STPUD will be after the California Highway Patrol acknowledges that the vehicle does meet all State and federal laws and weight restrictions. HIGH VELOCITY SEWER FLUSHING UNIT A. Water Pump shall be Myers D65-20 triplex positive displacement pump or equal, rated at 65 gpm at 2000 psi. Pump shall be gear driven; crankshaft speed shall not exceed 500 rpm. Pump suction shall be fitted with a 20 mesh stainless steel screen "Y" strainer, located for easy removal while standing outside of unit at ground level. B. Water Tanks shall have a minimum capacity of 1 500 U.S. gallons. The tanks shall be constructed of polyethylene adequately designed to withstand normal usage. Access to the tank top shall be provided via a ladder permanently mounted on the curb side of the unit. The tank shall be fitted with a pump intake line located 2" above the tank bottom and provided with a shut -off valve. In addition, the tank shall be fitted with a 2" diameter gate valve for draining with a control handle extending to the curb side of the unit. A tank fill system and fill hose storage compartment shall be provided and equipped with a lock. Filling system accessories shall be provided and shall meet the requirements of the local water serving agency. A 4" air gap shall be provided. Fittings shall be provided for connecting the sewer hose to the tank for recirculation and a water level sight gauge shall be mounted at the operator's station. A Y- strainer shall be installed in the fill line. -37- C. Enclosed Compartment Walls shall be constructed of 14 gage steel. Compartment floor shall be 12 gauge steel. Both sides of unit shall be equipped with aluminum roll up access doors for full access to the pump compartment and operator station. See attached drawing. Pump Power: the water pump shall be driven hydraulically with power direct supplied by the truck engine. All accessory devices shall be suitable for the high pressure application. Hydraulic pressure compensation pump shall be directed coupled to the . truck engine by a live drive shaft and fitted with a 24 gpm flow internal oil filter and oil temperature indicator. Hydraulic oil cooler shall be mounted at front of truck before truck's coolant radiator. Hydraulic oil shall be filtered through dual cartridge filters mounted on the suction line. Two (2) spare cartridges shall be provided. Hydraulic oil reservoir, water pump, and hydraulic motor shall be mounted above the chassis frame rails in the enclosed pump compartment located at the rear of the water tank. Hydraulic hose lines shall be mounted in hanger brackets bolted to the chassis frame to permit inspection of the lines. The throttle cable for the pressure compensating pump shall be located at the operator's control panel. Sewer Cleaning Hose Reel and Hydraulic System: The hose reel shall have a capacity to hold 1000 feet of 1" i.d., 2000 psi high pressure hose. The unit shall be equipped with 800 feet of 1" i.d., 2000 psi high pressure hose. The hose reel shall be constructed of steel and have rolled and formed one piece reel flanges. The reel shall be located at the rear of the pump compartment of the unit. The sewer hose shall be attached to the hose reel on the outside to allow changing the hose and shall be accessible from ground level. The hose reel shall be equipped with an automatic level wind assembly. The level wind shall automatically wind the sewer hose while the hose reel is in forward or reverse rotation. An electric footage meter and roller assembly shall be provided in conjunction with the level wind assembly and independently mounted on the control panel directly in front of the operator. The hose reel hydraulic shall be an integral part of the hydraulic pressure compensation pump oil system. The hose reel hydraulic pump shall be directly coupled to the front of the pressure compensation pump, and be live when the truck engine is running. Pump shall have a minimum rating of 0-8 gpm at 2000 psi. The hose reel hydraulic system shall be equipped with separate built -in overload relief valve, directional control and speed control valves. The hose reel shall have the capability to extend out from back of truck via a hydraulically powered cylinder. The hose reel will lock into position using a spring loaded safety pin at 2" intervals. The hose reel should rotate at least 180 degrees when fully extended from rear of truck to provide direct alignment to manholes. D. Controls A control panel shall be located at the rear of the unit with all controls within easy reach and view of the operator when standing at the control panel. Controls shall include: 1. Electronic throttle for the truck engine. 2. Hydraulic oil and water pressure system shall be equipped with glycerin filled gauges. 3. Hose reel speed control dial and directional control lever. 4. Plastic water level sight gage and low water warning light to show three minutes running time at 65 gpm. -38- 5. Water tank fill pipe and fill hose. A -Y Strainer on fill hose. 6. Tachometer for front truck engine. 7. High oil temperature waming light and low oil pressure. 8. Engine waming Tight or limp mode on low oil pressure and overheat at operator station. E. Water System Piping and appurtenant fittings shall be suitable for a working pressure of 2000 psi. Pump discharge shall be fitted with a repairable pressure regulator adjustable from 0-2000 psi. F. Body The completed unit shall be equipped with tool compartments and storage boxes to house the necessary operating accessories. All storage compartments and access openings shall have lockable doors constructed of stainless steel or aluminum. Skirting on the sides and full rear width of the unit shall be of 10 gauge extending the full height of the tool boxes with cut outs for rear wheels. There shall be an expanded drip tray directly below the hose reel for water drainage and bolt on metal covers on both sides of the unit between the water tank and the pump compartment. G. Pointing All metal shall be cleaned and primed before painting. Sewer cleaning unit including interior of unit shalt be painted to match the truck cab color (frost white). H. Mounting Mounting of the pressure compensating pump at the PTO location shall be made to avoid interruption with a driver's visibility and must not extend outside of the truck chassis rails. Truck chassis shall have front bumper extension beyond the operating components for protection of the components. Truck headlights forward illumination shall not be restricted by mounting of any components, nor shall any feature of the sewer cleaning unit interfere with the towing of the unit, checking oil, coolant, or forward tilt of the truck hood. In addition, no components shall be mounted in front of the truck's radiator unless they are designed for air flow through the radiator. I. Additional Equipment the following supplies and equipment shall be provided with the completed unit: 1. One (1) each Easement Roller Kit 2. One (1) each Spotlight for manhole inspection with plug at location of operators controls. 3. Two (2) each Flashing Amber Strobes, Austin Electric 18, series or equal, mounted on top center of cab and on top rear of unit, controls mounted inside cab. An arrowstik directional arrow board, model #AS847 or equal mounted at rear of vehicle, which controls mounted inside cab. 4. Four (4) each high pressure nozzles suitable for use with the specified equipment as follows: One (1) each 15 degree hardened steel radial nozzle Two (2) each 30 degree hardened steel radial nozztes,.one with forward jet One (1) each 30 degree aluminum sand and grease nozzle One (1) wart hog nozzle or equal 5. Two (2) 12 volt flood tights mounted on rear of vehicle positioned to illuminate the work area while cleaning sewer lines. Control switch to be mounted at rear control panel. -39- 2. TRUCK CHASSIS AND CAB: A. General The vehicle furnished shall be a new 2011 model and shall include all equipment normally furnished as standard including the following, which may be standard features and equipment, additional or optional. It shall be the responsibility of the bidder to match the proper vehicle to the cleaning machine so that the fully - loaded, ready to operate unit is properly balanced and loaded to insure a safe, effective, and operable unit, meeting all safety, loading and weight requirements. If a vehicle which exceeds the minimum specifications is required to transport the cleaning unit, bidder shall provide the necessary vehicle and include all costs therefore in his base bid. B. Vehicle Application The vehicle shall be used to mount and transport the High Velocity Sewer Flushing Unit described in Section 1 of these specifications. 1 C. Engine and Equipment Engine shall be current model diesel, rated at a minimum 300 gross horsepower 860 lb-ft torque @ 1400 rpm. Engine exhaust emissions shall meet or exceed Federal and State of California Emissions Standards. Tier 4 D. Engine Electrical An 80 amp altemator shall be engine mounted. Batteries shall be 12 volt rated at 1500 amps cold cranking current @ 0 F. and have 320 minutes reserve capacity at 80 F. E. Engine Cooling System Truck shall be provided with a heavy duty radiator with adequate capacity to maintain the provided diesel engine at proper operating temperatures under all operating conditions. Corrosion inhibitor shall be provided, Nalcool additive or equal. F. Additional Engine Equipment Engine shall be equipped with a Dry-type air cleaner with 12" front intake. Air cleaner shall be Donaldson, Fram or equal, engine mounted and included a pop-up indicator and ether cup. A belt driven 12 cu ft water cooled Bendix Westinghouse TRU FLO 501 or equal compressor shall be provided for the brake system. Factory installed power steering shall be provided. An alarm system for oil pressure and water temperature shall be provided. The system shall include lights and buzzers for low oil pressure and high water temperature. Features shall be included with engine shutdown. An engine hour meter shall be provided. Engine shall be equipped with an electronic type hand throttle. G. Exhaust Equipment Truck shall be provided with a single vertical exhaust system with horizontal muffler mounted on the right side of the cab and shall include a heat guard. H. Transmission and Equipment Unit shall be similar or equal to 5 -speed automatic, Allison MD3060 DRD with a torque rating of 625 lb-ft. Manufacturer recommended. -40- 1 I. Chassis Equipment ACT.WT FRONT: 7,000 LBS. ACT.WT REAR: 12,000 LBS. Wheelbase shall be maximum 155" - 165". Gross Vehicle Weight Rating shall be not less than 33,000 lbs. Rectangular step -type dual 50 gallon fuel tanks shall be included and mounted to the frame. Front and Rear Bumpers shall be provided. Suitable tow hooks shall be provided on the front end of each side rail to allow towing the fully loaded vehicle. J. Brake System A Rockwell or equal air brake system shall be included. Front: 15" x 4 ", Rear. 16' /z" x 7 ". System shall include an air park brake, air pressure gage, low air warning Tight and buzzer. Auto slack adjusters shall be included along with a Bendix AD9 air dryer or equal. K. Cab and Cowl Equipment Unit to be fumished with a high cab, Top Kick/Kodiak or equal. Cab to be mounted on cushion mounts, have fiberglass tilt hood and bolt -on fenders. Removable transmission and engine access covers shall be located inside the cab and factory air condition. Cab shall be provided with electric tachometer, tinted glass on all windows, entry handles on right and left sides, dual electric homs, two mirrors, 7" x 16 ", Ieff and right with stainless steel frames and mounting brackets. Cab shall be equipped with a full width bench seat, forward folding back and including three safety belts, two with retractors. Arm rests shall be provided on interior cab doors. Cab features shall include a full gage package, AM -FM radio, heater /defroster, 2 speed windshield wipers, dual interior visors and floor mats. L. Paint and Interior Trim Paint shall be solid tone frost white, upper and lower. Interior trim shall be Light Saddle. M. Wheels and Tires Mud and snow tread on rear tires. Mud flaps shall be provided on the rear wheel wells. Manuals Successful bidder shall furnish two sets of manuals for operations and instructions of the combination truck mounted sewer flushing unit. Manuals shall be divided into truck and cleaning unit sections. Successful bidder shall also provide parts manuals for the cleaning unit and Cab and Chassis (CDs acceptable), and a repair and service manual for Cab and Chassis. N. Delivery Maximum delivery schedule will be 180 days. -41- r rte= _: - ‘ \\ - TAN K- _./ Ate. r rile ' • ' 1 1b' me • : I Ih ct" DLL -UP DOOR 155 " - 165 " - N V WATER TANK r -^, r - --L r A - TANK ___________._.___,, . .„......_ ....._ ,.........„ Imam , mill ..„..) , .... _ ..... ,s,„.., 1 ,... i (,,,,,,,,,, _� '�, fir:'" - E 11 liniilliii lii1 STORAGE BO SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ADDITIONAL MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS & CONDITIONS FOR ALL VEHICLES All equipment fumished as standard by the manufacturer shall be included in the vehicle(s), whether or not stated in the minimum specifications. Special items needed to bring the vehicle up to the minimum specifications shall be accepted only if they are the manufacturers regular factory options. The vehicle shall be a new, late model. Prior to delivery, the vehicle shall be completely serviced as necessary for full operation. The vehicle shall include: crank cases, transmission, transfer cases and differentials filled to capacity, the radiator shall be filled and protected against afreezing temperature of 20 degrees below 0 degrees Fahrenheit. The delivery date or term within which the bid item(s) will be delivered shall be stated by the bidder on the bid form. The successful bidder will be obligated to deliver the item(s) by or within the stated date of term. Failure by the successful bidder to notify the South Tahoe Public Utility District immediately of any delivery delay beyond the stated date or term is cause for the bidder to be held responsible for damages incurred as a result of an extended delivery time, and may also impact the bidder's potential for future bids with the District. The vehicle shall have the standard manufacturer's warranty. Any and all conversions made to the vehicle's cab, body, chassis, running gear, engine, drive train and all other components shall have a full warranty. Dealer must provide the name, address and phone number of all subcontractor's work with the bid. Warranty documents shall be delivered with the vehicle. In all purchases by the District, availability and accessibility of warranty service and service after warranty may be considered in determining the low bidder. Bids shall be for the total net price including all applicable taxes and charges, delivered F.O.B., South Tahoe Public Utility District, South Lake Tahoe, California. The South Tahoe Public Utility District is exempt from Federal Excise Taxes. The District is a "Special District" Govemment agency and may be eligible for special discounts or pricing. District Fleet account numbers include: DaimlerChrysler 005C5 and Ford QC206. In determining the lowest bidder, the District will deduct 1 '/z % from the bid of those bidders having a fixed place of business within the District boundaries, when that bid will provide local sales tax revenue for the benefit of the District's customers. In order to receive full consideration, bids must fully follow District specifications and the attached 'request for bid general conditions ". �1Di+lero u,k, rlr, n"1. ►eem/N ..4 +es Ir id4r.4ir.ne +r D ,-1 mT• he remr.., f►i+►r. f+. +i a►o mr.ilinrte -43- General Manager Riohuxd H. Sozrig S outh It Jones - f ublic Utility District , Mary Mookocbor Er Pals Klee isa,r 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6a TO: Board of Directors FROM: John Thiel, Principal Engineer MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Grizzly Mountain Booster Station REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Hold a Public Meeting to receive comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. DISCUSSION: The District has prepared an Initial Study (IS) with a finding that the proposed project will not result in any significant adverse environmental effects as a result of implementation. A Notice of Completion and Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Negative Declaration was filed with the State Clearinghouse on March 23, 2011, for a 30-day review period which expires on April 22, 2011. The NOt was also provided to property owners within 300 feet of the project. Questions and comments received on the project will be summarized at the public meeting. Open the meeting to receive public input on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for the project. A brief description of the project will be provided by District staff prior to taking public comment. SCHEDULE: Pending Board approval. COSTS: None. ACCOUNT NO: 2029 - 8176 / GRIZBS BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $1,173,137 ATTACHMENTS: Draft Initial Study /Draft Environmental Checklist is available for viewing on the District's website www.stpud.us and at the District office. Notice of Intent is attached. CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO • CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO —45— NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT Project Title: Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Project Location: 1553 Grizzly Mountain Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 APN 033 - 494 -10 Lead Agency: South Tahoe Public Utility District County: El Dorado County PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of the construction of a new booster pump station to improve the primary water service to approximately 3,000 existing homes in the Flagpole and Twin Peaks water zones. The project increases water reliability to the Flagpole and Twin Peaks water zones by providing a second source of water to the area currently served by only one pipeline from the Arrowhead water zone (located in Meyers). The new station is being funded by the District as the matching funds for a Fire Protection Partnership Funding / USFS Forest Health Fund grant that was used for the North Apache Booster station and Grizzly Mountain water line replacement project. With a standby pump and a diesel- powered standby generator, the Grizzly Mountain Booster Station will provide a substantial improvement to water reliability and fire protection in the Tahoe Paradise area. The proposed Booster Station building is about 968 square feet and 34 feet high, and is designed to blend with adjacent residential structures in the surrounding neighborhood. The booster station will be accessed by a new driveway from Grizzly Mountain Drive. A waterline pipeline replacement (Grizzly Mountain Water Line Replacement Project) will be constructed by the District on Grizzly Mountain Drive and North Upper Truckee Road under a separate project to connect the booster station to the existin g water zones. The environmental review for the pipeline replacement has been completed under a separate contract. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: STPUD has made this Notice of Intent (NOI), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), and Initial Study (IS) available for public review and comment pursuant to Section 15073(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The 30-day comment period for the NOI, MND, and IS begins on March 23, 2011 and ends on April 22, 2011. Comments should be submitted to the South Tahoe Public Utility District at: 1275 Meadow Crest Dr. South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Attn: John Thiel PUBLIC MEETINGS: The District's Board of Directors will take comments on the IS/MND at their regularly scheduled Board Meeting on April 21, 2011 (2:00 p.m.) and will consider adopting the MND at its regularly scheduled Board Meeting on May 5, 2011 (2:00 p.m.) to which the public and all interested parties to this matter are invited. The meetings will be held at District offices (address above). DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY: The MND and IS are available for review during regular business hours at the District offices. There is also an electronic copy available online at the District's website, www.stpud.us. If you require additional information, please contact Mr. Thiel at (530) 543 -6209 or submit questions and comments by email at jthiel®stpud.dst.ca.us. -47- General Manager Riohini H. Solbrig � S outh Ta Directors (Iris Cofitu \ .: _ Public Utility District - , James "' �� ` ` � 'r • Scluifer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544- 6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6b TO: Board of Directors FROM: No Bergsohn, Hydro Geologist MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Recycled Water Facilities Master Plan REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Hold a Public Meeting to receive comments on the Draft (SEIR) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. DISCUSSION: Receive public comments on the SEIR prepared for changes to the District's Recycled Water Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 and 2. SCHEDULE: COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: 1029 - 8161 /DVRIIP BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: Included with the DVR Improvement project budget $5,600,000. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report dated March 28, 2011 is available for viewing at the District office or upon request to the Clerk of the Board. CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO • CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES '11 NO -49-- General Manager Richard H. Solbeig ` _ <= South Tahoe Directors .Chris CORN ( : , �U Utility . . M ary Lou Mosbadrar � \ Public UtiIi �y District J Dale PJto Ede Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6c TO: Board of Directors FROM: No Bergsohn, Hydro Geologist MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Alpine County Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Award contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. DISCUSSION: Starting on March 22, 2011, staff advertised for bids for construction of the Alpine Country Monitoring Well Installation project. Seven (7) general contractors and one (1) subcontractor attended the mandatory pre -bid conference on April 6, 2011. Bids will be received until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 19th, 2011. A summary of the bids, along with staff recommendations for award will be distributed prior to, and at the Board meeting. SCHEDULE: April through July 2011 (anticipated) COSTS: $85,000 (engineer's estimate of probable costs) ACCOUNT NO: 1029- 8136 /ALPMWS BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $200,000 ATTACHMENTS: Bid summary and staff recommendation will be distributed prior to, and at the Board meeting. CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTH) CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES y NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES 4 NO -51- i South Tahoe Public Utility District Qe "vN 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Telephone: (530)544-6474 Fax: (530)541 -4319 Memorandum Date: April 20, 2011 To: Board Members, Richard H. Solbrig, Paul A. Sciuto From: Heidi C. Baugh, Contracts Administrator Subject: Alpine County Monitoring Wells Installation Project At 2:00 o'clock on the aftemoon of April 19, 2011 we received and opened three (3) sealed bids for the above - referenced project. Bids ranged from $71,210 to $191,315.50. The engineer's estimate was $78,661. A careful review and analysis of the three bids showed a number of deviations. See attached spreadsheet and list of deviations for full breakdown of each bid. Technicon Engineering Services., Inc. is the apparent low bidder. Technicon Engineering Services, Inc. had only minor deviations. I contacted the Contractors License Board and was given the following information: License Number 767888 is current and active and expires 08/31/2011. The company is a corporation. Technicon Engineering Services., Inc. holds a Class C -57 — Well Drilling (Water) license. cc: U.wol a Irowvi, No gergsohw South Tahoe Public Utility District • 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474 • Facsimile 530.541.0614 Alpine County Monitoring Wells Installation Project Bid Opening: 4/19/2011 at 2:00 o'clock p.m. Deviations and information gathered during bid analysis of the three lowest bids: Technicon Engineering Services, Inc.: • Bidder's General Information Item 5, did not provide name, address and phone number of broker for surety. • On the Acknowledgment of Insurance Requirements, contractor added, "Note: Builders Risk policy will be reinstated upon award of contract." By Addendum No. 1, Builders Risk policy is not required for this work. • Certification by Contractor's Insurance Broker form was not provided with bid. Instead contractor provided actual insurance certificates. Cascade Drilling, L.P.: • The book was not submitted with the bid. The bid pages were copied and information typed into these pages. • Documentation required to be submitted with Bid per Addendum No. 1, Item No. 1 was NOT included with bid. • Bidder's General Information Items 1 and 2, address on CA State License Board is a PO Box in Woodinville, Washington; the address provided in the bid is 3632 Omec Circle, Rancho Cordova, CA. • Bidder's General Information Item 5, name, address and phone number of surety was not provided. • Bid Bond: Bid bond was NOT provided. I spoke with the broker who indicated they do not have a bond request on file from Cascade at this time. She indicated, however, they do provide this service for Cascade and a bond in the amount of the Engineer's Estimate of this project would be no problem. • Bid Items: Written words for Bid Item 11 reflected the lineal feet quantity rather than the Unit Price. Diamond Well Drilling Co.: • Documentation required to be submitted with Bid per Addendum No. 1, Item No. 1 was NOT included with bid. • Bidder's General Information, Item 3, License C -61 was listed on Bid form, but not on State webpage. • Bidder's General Information, Item 5, contractor provided name of surety in parenthises after the name of the brokerage, "Allied Insurance (AMCO) ". Brokerage phone number was not provided. Surety address and phone numbers were not provided. • Bid Items, Bid total as received was written for $.20 Tess than it actually calculates out to be. i 0, SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT'S ALPINE COUNTY MONITORING WELJ,(ISTALLATIOj4 PROJECT P BID SUMMARY (04/19/2011) '' *' ° 7..111 ,e ° U a, w '` • s ew. .SAIL,_ .� _b 11. °•,:W? :- -' A1 ,_21 . 1ti 1 AM .. - n i mir . iz Mob/Demob, Including bonds, 1 ins., cleanup... (10%) LS 1 , $7,500.00 $7,500.00 6,400.00 $6,400.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 Drill nominal 8" ID borehold for soil sampling and monitoring well construction max depth of 60' at 2 test location. LF 460 $60.00 527,800.00 34.00 $15,640.00 $63.00 $28,980.00 8100.87 $46,400.20 Fumish/install new 2" nominal " diameter, threaded flush jt., Sch.40 PVC blank well casing, stainless steel centralizers & 3 PVC locking well cap. LF 160 $7.50 $1,200.00 9.00 81,440.00 $24.00 $3,840.00 $21.15 $3,384.00 Fumish/install new 2" niminal diameter, threaded flush jt., Sch 40 PVC slotted well screen & 4 bottom cap. LF 280 810.00 $2,800.00 7.00 $1,960.00 *28.00 $7,840.00 *24.15 $6,762.00 Fumish/install clean, washed & graded 16x30 mesh sand filter 5 pack. LF _ 325_ 815.00 $4,875.00 23.00 *7,475.00 *9.00 $2,925.00 $38.62 $12,551.50 Fumish/install hydrated bentonite LF 28 6 seal. $12.00 $336.00 50.00 81,400.00 816.00 $448.00 $30.00 *840.00 Fumish/install neat cement grout 7, seal. LF 80 815.00 81,200.00 22.00 81,760.00 *11.00 $880.00 $35.00 $2,800.00 • Fumish/install stand-up hinged steel well cover, surface pad and 8 Sch.40 carbon steel guard posts. EA 11 $500.00 $5,500.00 600.00 $6,600.00 $900.00 $9,900.00 81,996.00 $21,956.00 Fumish/install traffic rated well cover and surface pad set flush EA 3 with surrounding grade or 9 pavement. $250.00 $750.00 450.00 $1,350.00 $450.00 $1,350.00 $774.00 $2,322.00 Complete well development by mechanical surging and/or 10 overpumping per specs. HRS _ 28 8350.00 89,800.00 175.00 $4,900.00 $260.00 $7,280.00 $350.00 *9,800.00 Provide soil samples, incldg all soil sample containers, sample 11 liners and core boxes per specs. LF 380 $10.00 $3,800.00 10.00 83,800.00 $69.00 $26,220.00 $110.00 $41,800.00 Provide drilling waste disposal, incldg waste containment per LS 1 12 specs. 82,500.00 $2,500.00 7,000.00 87,000.00 816,500.00 *16,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Provide/maintain traffic control for well construction work wfn 13 public r-o-w. LS 1 , $2,500.00 $2,500.00 7,000.00 $7,000.00 812,000.00 $12,000.00 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 Crew per diem on total cost/day 14 basis. DAYS 25 $300.00 $7,500.00 175.00 84,375.00 $450.00 $11,250.00 8500.00 $12,500.00 Provide well destruction/bore 15 holeabandonment, if required. LF 40 $20.00 $800.00 2.75 8110.00 $89.00 $3,560.00 $40.00 $1,600.00 TOTAL per District Review and Calculation: $78,661.00 871,210.00 8137,973.00 $191,315.70 TOTAL as written In Bid Received: same same $191,315.50 1 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL April 21, 2011 Payroll 4/5/2011 431,068.68 Total Payroll 431,068.68 ADP 398.37 American Express 9,465.53 Bank of America 0.00 BNY Mellon Trust Company 0.00 Brownstein /Hyatt/Farber /Schreck legal services 0.00 CDS- health care payments 185,295.81 Union Bank 0.00 Total Vendor EFT 195,159.71 Accounts Payable Checks -Sewer Fund 236,999.35 Accounts Payable Checks -Water Fund 2,210,242.93 Accounts Payable Checks - Self - funded Insurance 0.00 Accounts Payable Checks - Grants Fund 0.00 Total Accounts Payable 2,447,242.28 Grand Total 3,073,470.67 Payroll EFTs & Checks 4/5 /2011 EFT AFLAC Medical & Dependent Care 1,185.70 EFT CA Employment Taxes & W/H 19,118.10 EFT Federal Employment Taxes & W/H 90,552.96 EFT Ca1PERS Contributions 71,200.32 EFT Great West Deferred Comp 18,919.08 EFT Stationary Engineers Union Dues 2,414.59 EFT United Way Contributions 134.00 EFT Employee Direct Deposits 218,083.94 CHK Employee Garnishments 1,389.22 CHK Employee Paychecks 8,070.77 Total 431,068.68 -53- PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department / Proi Name pAtadigism AccI# / Proi Code Amount Check Num, Type A -1 CHEMICAL INC GEN & ADMIN OFFICE INVENTORY 1000 - 0428 569.89 Check Total: 5651 RQ AP- 00078892 MW AFLAC GEN & ADMIN SUPP INS W/H 1000 - 2532 744.70 Check Total: 744 70 AP 00078893 MW ALPEN SIERRA COFFEE GEN & ADMIN OFC SUPPLY ISSUE 1000 - 6081 295.90 Check Total: 995 qn AP- 00078894 MW ALPINE COUNTY PUBUC WORKS ENGINEERING - DVR MONIT WELLS MON WIS DVR/ALPC 1029 - 8136 - ALPMWS 150.00 Check Total: 15n nn AP- 00078895 MW ALPINE EYECARE LLC CUSTOMER SERVICE SAFETY/EQUIP /PHY 1038 - 6075 155.00 ALPINE EYECARE LLC CUSTOMER SERVICE SAFETY/EQUIP/PHY 2038 - 6075 155.00 Check Total: R1n nn AP- 00078896 MW ALSBURY, MARY INFORMATION SYS TRAVELIMEETINGS 1037 - 6200 86.00 ALSBURY, MARY INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2037 - 6200 86.00 Check Total: 172 nn AP- 00078897 MW AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERVICES GEN & ADMIN UNIFORM PAYABLE 1000 - 2518 1,094.37 cre Check Total: 1 n94 37 AP- 00078898 MW i ARETE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - GIS SFTWR DEV CONTRACT SERVICE 1029 - 4405 - GISSFT 337.50 ARETE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - GIS SFTWR DEV CONTRACT SERVICE 2029 - 4405 - GISSFT 337.50 ARETE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - GIS SFTWR DEV ARETE, GIS 2029 - 8120 - GISSFT 1,530.00 Check Total: 9 2n5 nn AP-00078899 MW AT &T MOBILITY PUMPS TELEPHONE 1002 - 6310 19.80 AT &T MOBILITY PUMPS TELEPHONE 2002 - 6310 19.79 Check Total: 39 5q AP- 00078900 MW AT &TICALNET 2 GEN & ADMIN TELEPHONE 1000 - 6310 328.75 AT &T /CALNET 2 CUSTOMER SERVICE TELEPHONE 1038 - 6310 7.17 AT &T /CALNET 2 GEN & ADMIN TELEPHONE 2000 - 6310 328.75 AT &T /CALNET 2 CUSTOMER SERVICE TELEPHONE 2038 - 6310 7.17 Check Total: R71 R4 AP 00078901 MW AWARDS OF TAHOE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 1021 - 6621 7.50 AWARDS OF TAHOE ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 2021 - 6621 7.50 Check Total: 15_nn AP- 00078902 MW User: THERESA Page: 1 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH_PMT CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vonder Noma Deoartment I Pros Name pe#crlotlon Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num DIM AXELSON IRON SHOP HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 32.63 Check Total: 32 Pa AP- 00078903 MW BALAS, RICHARD CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 200.00 Check Total: _maim AP- 00078904 MW BENTLY AGROWDYNAMICS OPERATIONS SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1006 - 6652 4,112.78 Check Total: 4 112 78 AP- 00078905 MW BING MATERIALS UNDERGROUND REP PIPE/CVRS/MHLS 2001 - 6052 2,038.11 Check Total: 2 nag 11 AP- 00078906 MW BROWN MILBERY INC HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004 - 6041 274.36 Check Total: 274 AP- 00078907 MW CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GEN & ADMIN SHOP SUPPLY INV 1000 - 0421 39.58 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UNDERGROUND REP PIPE/CVRS/MHLS 1001 - 6052 51.88 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ELECTRICAL SHOP PRIMARY EQUIP 1003 - 6021 182.55 CAUF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ELECTRICAL SHOP SECONDARY EQUIP 1003 - 6022 135.86 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ELECTRICAL SHOP PUMP STATIONS 1003 - 6051 121.39 1 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HEAVY MAINT PRIMARY EQUIP 1004 - 6021 127.49 CALIF BEARD OF EQUALIZATION HEAVY MAINT GROUNDS & MNTC 1004 - 6042 39.02 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1006 - 4820 38.76 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 21.13 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION LABORATORY TKN DIGESTER 1007 - 7607 247.84 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS & MNTC 1028 - 6042 221.46 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ENGINEERING - DVR IRRIG IMPRVS DVR IRR IMPRVMNT 1029 - 8161 - DVRIIP 388.76 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION INFORMATION SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 1037 - 6030 7.19 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CUSTOMER SERVICE SHOP SUPPLIES 1038 - 6071 43.24 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 22.31 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ELECTRICAL SHOP PUMP STATIONS 2003 - 6051 123.06 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 21.13 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION INFORMATION SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 2037 - 6030 7.20 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CUSTOMER SERVICE SHOP SUPPLIES 2038 - 6071 43.23 Check Total: 1. RRR na AP- 00078909 MW CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FINANCE SUPPLIES 1039 - 6520 67.85 CALIF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FINANCE SUPPLIES 2039 - 6520 67.85 User. THERESA Page: 2 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Y111.44011032 Department / Proi Name Deacrbtion Acct# / Pro' Code Amount Check Num Tvoe Check Total: 135 7n AP- 00078910 MW CAUF DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUMPS REGLTRY OP PRMTS 2002 - 6650 892.80 Check Total: 599 RQ AP- 00078911 MW CALIF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEAVY MAINT TRAVEUMEETINGS 1004 - 6200 50.00 Check Total: 50 nQ AP- 00078912 MW CAUF SECRETARY OF STATE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEUMEETINGS 1038 - 6200 20.00 CALIF SECRETARY OF STATE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEUMEETINGS 2038 - 6200 20.00 Check Total: an nn AP- 00078913 MW CALIFORNIA URBAN WATER CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 2,959.14 Check Total: 9 959 14 AP- 00078914 MW CALLIAN, JERALEE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEUMEETINGS 1038 - 6200 86.00 CALLIAN, JERALEE CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEUMEETINGS 2038 - 6200 86.00 Check Total: 172 nQ AP- 00078915 MW CAPITAL FORD EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011 47.64 Check Total: 47 64 AP- 00078916 MW CARTE GERALD CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 200.00 i Check Total: 2n n AP- 00078917 MW CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 1037 - 4405 1,305.75 CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1037 - 4820 5.25 CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPLIS 1037 - 4840 377.34 CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 2037 - 4405 1,305.75 CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 2037 - 4820 5.27 CDW-G CORP INFORMATION SYS DIST.COMP SPPLIS 2037 - 4840 377.34 Check Total: 3 37A 7(1 AP 00078918 MW CHIEFFO, MIKE HEAVY MAINT TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1004 - 6200 57.12 Check Total: 57 19 AP- 00078919 MW CONTROLCO AUTOMATION INC. ELECTRICAL SHOP PUMP STATIONS 1003 - 6051 296.40 Check Total: 29f+ 40 AP- 00078920 MW CUEVAS, BENITO CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 200.00 Check Total: 9n nn AP- 00078921 MW CUNHA, SUSAN CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 -WCPROG 200.00 User: THERESA Page: 3 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH_PMT CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS i radar N&}ne Psaadarenuerstfisine DncrlRgla Acetic, / Proi Code Amount check Num Ipj Check Total: _mom AP- 00078922 MW CWEA UNDERGROUND REP DUES/MEMB/CERT 1001 - 6250 264.00 • CWEA LABORATORY DUES/MEMB/CERT 1007 - 6250 132.00 Check Total: _maim AP- 00078923 MW DELL MARKETING L P INFORMATION SYS LAPTOP, DVR 1037 - 8142 2,809.52 Check Total: 2 Rno 52 AP- 00078924 MW DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERGROUND REP - CALTRANS EROSION CALTRANS /CTY /CO 1001 - 6043 - ECCALT 31,000.00 Check Total: n1 non on AP- 00078925 MW DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERGROUND REP - CALTRANS EROSION CALTRANS/CTY /CO 2001 - 6043 - ECCALT 37,000.00 Check Total: n nn AP- 00078926 MW DICK'S FULLER - PUMPS BUILDINGS 1002 - 6041 234.79 DICK'S FULLER - PUMPS BUILDINGS 2002 - 6041 48.09 Check Total: 2R2 RR AP- 00078927 MW DIY HOME CENTER HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 79.25 DIY HOME CENTER ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 1029 - 6520 14.68 DIY HOP CENTER ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 2029 - 6520 14.67 Check Total: •fR an AP- 00078928 MW EL DORADO COUNTY ENGINEERING - LAKE TAHOE BLVD WTLN 12" LTB 2029 - 8067 - LTBWLR 73.50 EL DORADO COUNTY ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT BSTR GRIZ MTN BSTR 2029 - 8176 - GRIZBS 410.50 Check Total: _gum AP- 00078929 MW EL DORADO COUNTY UNDERGROUND REP REGLTRY OP PRMTS 2001 - 6650 68.00 Check Total: FR on AP- 00078930 MW EL DORADO COUNTY PUMPS REGLTRY OP PRMTS 2002 - 6650 250.00 Check Total: 75n m AP- 00078931 MW ENS RESOURCES INC DIO CONTRACT SERVICE 1027 - 4405 3,574.53 ENS RESOURCES INC DIO CONTRACT SERVICE 2027 - 4405 3,574.53 Check Total: 7.149 ng AP-00078932 MW ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 527.00 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 672.64 Check Total: _Lama Rd AP- 00078933 MW ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ASSO LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 122.68 User. THERESA Page: 4 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK C t Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department 1 Proi Name DcHction Acct# / Proi Code m A sort Check Num !Da ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ASSO LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 157.04 Check Total: 779 72 AP- 00078934 MW FAST FABRICATORS LLC PUMPS BLK BRT BSTR UPG 2002 - 8169 576.38 Check Total: 57R 3R AP- 00078935 MW FASTENAL EQUIPMENT REP SHOP SUPPLIES 1005 - 6071 92.30 Check Total: - 92 3n AP- 00078936 MW FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002 - 6048 9.48 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 19.41 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 13.57 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002 - 6051 5.68 Check Total: 41114 AP- 00078937 MW FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY - ALP CO MTBE CONT MONITORING 1007 - 6110 - ACMTBE 100.00 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY - HERBST MONITORING 2007 - 6110 - HERBST 100.00 Check Total: Inn on AP- 00078938 MW GARY'S HANDYMAN CUSTOMER SERVICE MISC LIAB CLAIMS 2038 - 4520 560.00 tn Check Total: _mug AP- 00078939 MW cO GEOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIP LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 98.17 GEOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIP LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 83.50 Check Total: 181 R7 AP- 00078940 MW GRAINGER HEAVY MAINT BIOSOL EQUP/BLDG 1004 - 6653 585.57 Check Total: 5R5 57 AP 00078941 MW GROVE MADSEN INDUSTRIES INC ELECTRICAL SHOP PRIMARY EQUIP 1003 - 6021 901.46 GROVE MADSEN INDUSTRIES INC ELECTRICAL SHOP LUTHER PASS 1003 - 6048 142.31 GROVE MADSEN INDUSTRIES INC ELECTRICAL SHOP BIOSOL EQUP/BLDG 1003 - 6653 144.00 Check Total: 1 187 77 AP- 00078942 MW HAUGE BRUECK ASSOCIATES LLC ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT BSTR GRIZ MTN BSTR 2029 - 8176 - GRIZBS 18,709.22 Check Total: 1 R 7t1q 77 AP 00078943 MW HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS OPERATIONS SERVICE CONTRACT 1006 - 6030 36.71 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS LABORATORY SERVICE CONTRACT 1007 - 6030 18.35 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACT 1021 - 6030 184.40 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICE CONTRACT 1029 - 6030 216.43 User THERESA Page: 5 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF C Yindettlielt Deogrtenent/ Prol Name andag211 Act / PrCol CCod. Amami Oval= Ina HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS FINANCE SERVICE CONTRACT 1039 - 6030 24.58 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS LABORATORY SERVICE CONTRACT 2007 - 6030 18.35 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACT 2021 - 6030 184.40 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICE CONTRACT 2029 - 6030 216.43 HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS FINANCE SERVICE CONTRACT 2039 - 6030 24.57 Check Total: R24 22 AP- 00078944 MW HUSSMANN, NANCY HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1022 - 6200 32.64 HUSSMANN, NANCY HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVEUMEETINGS 2022 - 6200 32.64 Check Total: R5 2$ AP- 00078945 MW IDEXX DISTRIBUTION CORP. LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 1,250.63 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION CORP. LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 1,284.32 Check Total: 2 534 q5 AP- 00078946 MW Iodine Village GID GEN & ADMIN - USFS GRNT ADMIN SUSPENSE 2000 - 2504 - SMOKEY 1,231,152.13 Check Total: 1 211 152 1 • AP- 00078947 MW INFOSEND INC. DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 1027 - 6620 - PREEXT 5,560.61 INFOSE) INC. DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 2027 - 6620 - PREEXT 5,560.61 1 Check Total: 11 121 22 AP- 00078948 MW r INSTROTEK INC. ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 1029 - 4820 540.25 Check Total: San 2 .i.. AP- 00078949 MW INTERSTATE SAFETY & SUPPLY GEN & ADMIN SHOP SUPPLY INV 1000 - 0421 699.23 INTERSTATE SAFETY & SUPPLY GEN & ADMIN SAFETY INVENTORY 1000 - 0425 512.48 Check Total: 1 211 71 AP- 00078950 MW IPMA-HR HUMAN RESOURCES DUES/MEMB/CERT 1022 - 6250 180.00 IPMA-HR HUMAN RESOURCES DUES/MEMB/CERT 2022 - 6250 180.00 Check Total: Ann nn AP- 00078951 MW KIMBALL MIDWEST HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 169.17 KIMBALL MIDWEST EQUIPMENT REP SHOP SUPPLIES 1005 - 6071 129.41 Check Total: 9AR 5t{ AP- 00078952 MW KINGSBURY GENERAL IMPROVEMENT GEN & ADMIN - USFS GRNT ADMIN SUSPENSE 2000 - 2504 - SMOKEY 25,256.38 Check Total: 25 2rifi VI AP- 00078953 MW KOSCIOLEK, LINDA CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVEUMEETINGS 1038 - 6200 86.00 Use: THERESA Page: 6 Current Date: 04 /152011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK Carreat Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Description Acct# / Proi Code Amon Check Num Type KOSCIOLEK, LINDA CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAVELIMEETINGS 2038 - 6200 86.00 Check Total: _maw AP 00078954 MW KRLT FM/KOWL AM DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 1027 - 6620 - PREEXT 648.00 KRLT FMIKOWL AM DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 2027 - 6620 - PREEXT 648.00 Check Total: 1 7ss On AP 00078955 MW KROLL FACTUAL DATA HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL EXPENS 1022 - 6670 15.72 KROLL FACTUAL DATA HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL EXPENS 2022 - 6670 15.71 Check Total: 31 4;1 AP 00078956 MW KTHO RADIO DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 1027 - 6620 - PREEXT 275.00 • KTHO RADIO DIO - PR EXP- EXTERNAL PUB RELATIONS 2027 - 6620 - PREEXT 275.00 Check Total: ssn nn AP 00078957 MW LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002 - 6073 58.45 LAKESIDE NAPA HEAVY MAINT MOBILE EQUIP 1004 - 6012 9.40 LAKESIDE NAPA HEAVY MAINT BUILDINGS 1004 - 6041 28.64 LAKESIDE NAPA HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 322.22 LAKESIIE NAPA HEAVY MAINT BIOSOL EQUP/BLDG 1004 - 6653 61.62 o LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011 1,334.58 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP SHOP SUPPLIES 1005 - 6071 26.94 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REP SMALL TOOLS 1005 - 6073 114.97 LAKESIDE NAPA PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002 - 6073 58.45 LAKESIDE NAPA HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004 - 6041 25.37 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005 - 6011 924.22 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR SHOP SUPPLIES 2005 - 6071 26.94 LAKESIDE NAPA EQUIPMENT REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 2005 - 6073 114.97 Check Total: 3 inn 77 AP 00078958 MW LAVALLEE, SPRING HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVELIMEETINGS 1022 - 6200 51.00 LAVALLEE, SPRING HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2022 - 6200 51.00 Check Total: 1 n9 an AP 00078959 MW LES SCHWAB TIRES EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011 516.41 Check Total: sin 41 AP 00078960 MW LIBERTY ENERGY GEN & ADMIN ELECTRICITY 1000 - 6330 80,005.27 LIBERTY ENERGY GEN & ADMIN ST LIGHTING EXP 1000 - 6740 23.96 User: THERESA Page: 7 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Yana Ulna Deoartmsnt / Proi Nam, Qtrade Um Ak ct$1 Prol Code AB E= Check Num Iy22 LIBERTY ENERGY GEN & ADMIN ELECTRICITY 2000 - 6330 18,083.83 Check Total: k1R 113 na AP- 00078961 MW ULLYS TIRE SERVICE INC. EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011 499.74 LILLY'S TIRE SERVICE INC. PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002 - 6051 13.10 Check Total: 519 R4 AP- 00078962 MW LOOMIS FINANCE CONTRACT SERVICE 1039 - 4405 330.10 LOOMIS FINANCE CONTRACT SERVICE 2039 - 4405 330.10 Check Total: FBI 9n AP- 00078963 MW MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK HUMAN RESOURCES SAFETY PROGRAMS 1022 - 6079 1,600.00 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK HUMAN RESOURCES SAFETY PROGRAMS 2022 - 6079 1,600.00 Check Total: a 9 nq AP- 00078964 MW MC MASTER CARR SUPPLY CO PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002 - 6048 755.61 MC MASTER CARR SUPPLY CO PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002 - 6071 64.16 MC MASTER CARR SUPPLY CO HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 169.38 MC MASTER CARR SUPPLY CO PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002 - 6071 64.15 MC MAKER CARR SUPPLY CO PUMPS MK BRT BSTR UPG 2002 - 8169 1,886.26 MC MA d'ER CARR SUPPLY CO ENGINEERING - ARPRT ARSNC EVAL AIRPORT ARSENIC 2029 - 7089 - AWAEPI 344.49 Check Total: a 954 n5 AP- 00078965 MW MEEKS BUILDING CENTER PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002 - 6048 0.82 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 1002 - 6051 8.03 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002 - 6073 67.52 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER HEAVY MAINT PRIMARY EQUIP 1004 - 6021 18.21 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER HEAVY MAINT BUILDINGS 1004 - 6041 28.21 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 49.36 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER HEAVY MAINT BIOSOL EQUPBLDG 1004 - 6653 21.32 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS & MNTC 1028 - 6042 625.87 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER UNDERGROUND REP PIPE/CVRSIMHLS 2001 - 6052 163.27 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 92.94 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002 - 6073 67.53 MEEKS BUILDING CENTER HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004 - 6041 13.31 Check Total: 1 the 'Aq AP-00078966 MW METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS GEN & ADMIN OFFICE INVENTORY 1000 - 0428 636.98 User. THERESA Page: 8 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Yendor Hams Department / Proi Name Dea Acct# / Proi Code Amount Check Num Tvoe METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 1021 - 6621 11.53 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 1029 - 4820 484.72 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INFORMATION SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1037 - 4820 38.23 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1038 - 4820 3.73 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1039 - 4820 7.11 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 2021 - 6621 11.53 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 2029 - 4820 484.74 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INFORMATION SYS OFFICE SUPPLIES 2037 - 4820 38.29 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2038 - 4820 3.73 METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2039 - 4820 7.15 Check Total: 1 797 74 AP- 00078968 MW MOTEL 6 PUMPS STANDBY ACCOMODA 1002 - 6083 216.26 MOTEL 6 PUMPS STANDBY ACCOMODA 2002 - 6083 216.26 Check Total: 439 59 AP-00078969 MW MOTION INDUSTRIES INC PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002 - 6048 1,320.50 1 Check Total: 1 390 5rt AP- 00078970 MW oI MOTOR�VF'ORMATION EQUIPMENT REP DUES/MEMB /CERT 1005 - 6250 750.00 MOTOR INFORMATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR DUES/MEMB/CERT 2005 - 6250 750.00 Check Total: _imam AP- 00078971 MW MOUNTAIN DEMOCRAT ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS 2021 - 4830 104.00 Check Total: 104 nn AP- 00078972 MW NELS TAHOE HARDWARE HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 20.13 NELS TAHOE HARDWARE EQUIPMENT REP MOBILE EQUIP 1005 - 6012 7.60 Check Total: 97 73 AP- 00078973 MW North Tahoe PUD GEN & ADMIN - USFS GRNT ADMIN SUSPENSE 2000 - 2504 - SMOKEY 550,621.88 Check Total: 550 AP- 00078974 MW OFFICE PRO ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS 1021 - 4830 12.50 OFFICE PRO ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPTIONS 2021 -4830 12.50 Check Total: Sri pq AP- 00078975 MW ONTRAC LABORATORY POSTAGE EXPENSES 1007 - 4810 20.00 ONTRAC LABORATORY - IND CRK RES MONT MONITORING 1007 - 6110 - INDIAN 14.00 ONTRAC LABORATORY MONITORING 1007 - 6110 8.50 User: THERESA Page: 9 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH_PMT_CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS anslaliame Department / Proi Name Rae Mks Aectfi / ProI Coda Amont 2baktium 1]CQ4 Check Total: 42 sn AP- 00078976 MW PARR, KEITH OPERATIONS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1006 - 6200 281.27 Check Total: 2R1 27 AP- 00078977 MW PDM STEEL HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 816.16 PDM STEEL DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS & MNTC 1028 - 6042 277.25 PDM STEEL PUMPS BLK BRT BSTR UPG 2002 - 8169 819.65 Check Total: _Liana ns AP- 00078978 MW PETTY CASH GEN & ADMIN POSTAGE EXPENSES 1000 - 4810 7.48 PETTY CASH UNDERGROUND REP TRAVEUMEETINGS 1001- 6200 28.08 PETTY CASH HEAVY MAINT TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1004 - 6200 94.47 PETTY CASH EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011 18.00 PETTY CASH ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 1021 - 6621 3.00 PETTY CASH ENGINEERING - ERB LINER REPL REPLACE ERB LINE 1029 - 7581 - ERBLNR 44.00 PETTY CASH GEN & ADMIN POSTAGE EXPENSES 2000 - 4810 7.48 PETTY CASH PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002 - 6051 11.00 PETTY EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005 - 6011 18.00 PETTY QASH ADMINISTRATION INCNTV & RCGNTN 2021 - 6621 2.99 PETTY CASH FINANCE TRAVEUMEETINGS 2039 - 6200 35.00 Check Total: 2Fq 5rt AP- 00078979 MW PRAXAIR 174 PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 1002 - 6071 179.64 PRAXAIR 174 HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 167.29 PRAXAIR 174 LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 70.91 PRAXAIR 174 UNDERGROUND REP SMALL TOOLS 2001- 6073 665.71 PRAXAIR 174 PUMPS SHOP SUPPLIES 2002 - 6071 179.62 PRAXAIR 174 LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 70.89 Check Total: ___1334.21 AP- 00078980 MW RAMOS, GILBERTO CUSTOMER SERVICE - WTR CONS PROG WTR CONS EXPENSE 2038 - 6660 - WCPROG 200.00 Check Total: 2nn nn AP- 00078981 MW RAVEN BIOLOGICAL LABS LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 100.00 RAVEN BIOLOGICAL LABS LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 184.54 Check Total: 2U M AP- 00078982 MW RENO GAZETTE- JOURNAL ENGINEERING - DVR MONIT WELLS MON WLS DVR/ALPC 1029 - 8136 - ALPMWS 159.07 User: THERESA Page: 10 Current Date: 04/15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department / Proi Name Deacrlotlon Acct# / Prol Code Amount Check Num Type RENO GAZETTE- JOURNAL ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT WTRLN WTRLN, GRIZ MTN 2029 - 7092 - GRIZWL 193.09 Check Total: .1.52 1R AP 00078983 MW RYAN, JULIE ENGINEERING - HEADWORKS HDWKS IMP PROJ 1029 - 8033 - HDWORK 148.00 Check Total: _lam nn AP 00078984 MW SACRAMENTO BEE, THE ENGINEERING - DVR MONIT WELLS MON WLS DVR/ALPC 1029 - 8136 - ALPMWS 1,034.48 SACRAMENTO BEE, THE ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT WTRLN WTRLN, GRIZ MTN 2029 - 7092 - GRIZWL 1,194.68 Check Total: 2 224 1R AP 00078985 MW SAN FRANCISCO FORD LINC MERC EQUIPMENT REP REP TRK 4 1005 - 8153 24,803.75 SAN FRANCISCO FORD LINC MERC EQUIPMENT REPAIR REPL TRK 61 2005 - 8182 24,803.75 Check Total: 4q 8,n7 5n AP 00078986 MW SCHAFER, ERIC BOARD OF DIR TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1019 - 6200 128.00 Check Total: 12R nn AP 00078987 MW SCIUTO, PAUL ENGINEERING TRAVEUMEETINGS 1029 - 6200 138.00 Check Total: 13R nn AP 00078988 MW SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS LUTHER PASS 1002 - 6048 33.77 SCOTT a HARDWARE PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 1002 - 6051 18.16 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 1002 - 6073 2.22 SCOTTYS HARDWARE LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 5.67 SCOTTYS HARDWARE DIAMOND VLY RNCH GROUNDS & MNTC 1028 - 6042 23.95 SCOTTYS HARDWARE CUSTOMER SERVICE SHOP SUPPLIES 1038 - 6071 62.63 SCOTTYS HARDWARE UNDERGROUND REP SMALL TOOLS 2001 - 6073 10.73 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS WELLS 2002 - 6050 2.99 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS PUMP STATIONS 2002 - 6051 9.17 SCOTTYS HARDWARE PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002 - 6073 2.22 SCOTTYS HARDWARE HEAVY MAINTENANC BUILDINGS 2004 - 6041 28.02 SCOTTYS HARDWARE LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 5.68 SCOTTYS HARDWARE CUSTOMER SERVICE SHOP SUPPLIES 2038 - 6071 41.45 Check Total: 24R_66 AP 00078989 MW SHARP, KATHY ADMINISTRATION TRAVEUMEETINGS 1021 - 6200 150.96 SHARP, KATHY ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL /MEETINGS 2021 - 6200 150.96 Check Total: Rn1 q9 AP 00078990 MW SHERIDAN, JOHN OPERATIONS TRAVEUMEETINGS 1006 - 6200 162.60 User THERESA Page: 11 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Underlie= 2sEntemtLepautams latiallaktn AccNk / Prol Code Matt Check Num RyAI Check Total: 1R2 Rn AP- 00078991 MW SHIELDS HARPER & CO INC HEAVY MAINT GROUNDS & MNTC 1004 - 6042 67.91 Check Total: g7 p1 AP- 00078992 MW SIERRA CHEMICAL CO OPERATIONS HYPOCHLORITE 1006 - 4755 7,875.30 Check Total: 7 R75 An. AP- 00078993 MW SIERRA FOOTHILL LABORATORY LABORATORY MONITORING 1007 - 6110 147.00 Check Total: 147 00 AP- 00078994 MW SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP UNDERGROUND REP INFILTRTN/INFLOW 1001 - 6055 66.56 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP EQUIPMENT REP REPL TRK 53 1005 - 8106 65.62 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP ENGINEERING - DVR MONIT WELLS MON WLS DVR/ALPC 1029 - 8136 - ALPMWS 208.54 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT WTRLN WTRLN, GRIZ MTN 2029 - 7092 - GRIZWL 245.87 SIERRA NEVADA MEDIA GROUP CUSTOMER SERVICE ADS/LGL NOTICES 2038 - 4930 363.96 Check Total: pgn gg AP- 00078995 MW SIERRA SPRINGS PUMPS SUPPLIES 1002 - 6520 11.43 SIERRA SPRINGS DIAMOND VLY RNCH SUPPLIES 1028 - 6520 11.43 SIERRAAPRINGS CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPPLIES 1038 - 6520 5.90 SIERRA SPRINGS CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPPLIES 2038 - 6520 5.89 Check Total: 34 grj AP- 00078996 MW SILVERS HR, LLC HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1022 - 6200 671.92 SILVERS HR, LLC HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVELMIEETINGS 2022 - 6200 671.92 Check Total: 1 343 R4 AP- 00078997 MW SNUG INFORMATION SYS DUES/MEMB/CERT 1037 - 6250 100.00 SNUG INFORMATION SYS DUES/M£MB/CERT 2037 - 6250 100.00 Check Total: 200.00 AP- 00078998 MW SOUTH TAHOE REFUSE GEN & ADMIN REFUSE DISPOSAL 1000 - 6370 237.42 Check Total: 237 49 AP- 00078999 MW SOUTH EST GAS GEN & ADMIN NATURAL GAS 1000 - 6350 13,586.19 SOUTHWEST GAS GEN & ADMIN NATURAL GAS 2000 - 6350 800.57 Check Total: 14 MR 7q AP- 00079000 MW SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE INC INFORMATION SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 1037 - 6030 177.08 SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE INC INFORMATION SYS SERVICE CONTRACT 2037 - 6030 177.08 User. THERESA Page: 12 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vepdgr Name Department / ProiName Description Acct# 1 Prol Code Amount Check Num Type SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE INC INFORMATION SYS SQL LICENCES 2037 - 8984 5,150.00 Check Total: 5 5{14 1R AP- 00079001 MW SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & ENGINEERING - HEADWORKS -PH 1 HDWKS IMP PROJ 1029 - 8033 - HDWKPI 37.92 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & ENGINEERING - FILTER ASSMNT REHAB FLTR 5 &6 1029 - 8066 - FILTER 492.96 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & ENGINEERING - REPL GEN, LPPS REPL GEN LPPS 1029 - 8933 - RGLPPS 372.88 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 1037 - 4405 104.32 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & CUSTOMER SERVICE CONTRACT SERVICE 1038 - 4405 104.32 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & ENGINEERING - LAKE TAHOE BLVD WTLN 12" LTB 2029 - 8067 - LTBWLR 6.32 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & ENGINEERING - ECHO TANK REPL TANK, ECHO 2029 - 8809 - ECHOTK 6.32 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & ENGINEERING - IROQUOIS BSTR ST BSTR STN IROQ 2029 - 8967 - IQBSTR 126.40 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 2037 - 4405 104.32 SUBSTITUTE PERSONNEL & CUSTOMER SERVICE CONTRACT SERVICE 2038 - 4405 104.32 Check Total: 1 4Rn nR AP-00079002 MW SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 1037 - 4405 213.60 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. INFORMATION SYS CONTRACT SERVICE 2037 - 4405 213.60 en Check Total: 427 7n AP- 00079003 MW SWAIN, (CAROL INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1037 - 6200 86.00 SWAIN, CAROL INFORMATION SYS TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2037 - 6200 86.00 Check Total: 172 nq AP- 00079004 MW TAHOE BASIN CONTAINER SERVICE GEN & ADMIN REFUSE DISPOSAL 1000 - 6370 312.50 TAHOE BASIN CONTAINER SERVICE OPERATIONS SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1006 - 6652 12,432.00 Check Total: 12 744 5Q AP- 00079005 MW TAHOE BLUEPRINT ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT BSTR GRIZ MTN BSTR 2029 - 8176 - GRIZBS 490.55 Check Total: 4qn 55 AP- 00079006 MW Tahoe City PUD GEN & ADMIN - USFS GRNT ADMIN SUSPENSE 2000 - 2504 - SMOKEY 38,597.70 Check Total: 1R 5q7 7Q AP- 00079007 MW TAHOE PRINTING FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 1039 - 4820 16.31 TAHOE PRINTING FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2039 - 4820 16.31 Check Total: R7 52 AP- 00079008 MW TAHOE VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SHOP BUILDINGS 1003 - 6041 634.55 TAHOE VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SHOP SHOP SUPPLIES 1003 - 6071 179.49 TAHOE VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SHOP SMALL TOOLS 1003 - 6073 42.41 User: THERESA Page: 13 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vander llaaw tlenartmant 1 Pros lame rlotlon Acct# 1 Prof Code Amount Check Nu_m Iva TAHOE VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SHOP BUILDINGS 2003 - 6041 222.42 TAHOE VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SHOP WELLS 2003 - 6050 53.44 TAHOE VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SHOP SHOP SUPPLIES 2003 - 6071 252.90 Check Total: 1 3R5 21 AP- 00079009 MW THOMAS HAEN CO INC GEN & ADMIN - IROQUOIS BSTR ST CONST RETAINAGE 2000 - 2605 - IQBSTR 36,030.08 THOMAS HAEN CO INC ENGINEERING - IROQUOIS BSTR ST BSTR STN IROQ 2029 - 8967 - IQBSTR 156,715.50 Check Total: 192 7a5 5A AP-00079010 MW Thomson Reuters/Bardays ENGINEERING DUES /MEMB /CERT 1029 - 6250 60.00 Thomson Reuters/Bardays ENGINEERING DUES/MEMB/CERT 2029 - 6250 60.00 Check Total: 12n nn AP- 00079011 MW TRPA ENGINEERING - GRIZZLY MT BSTR GRIZ MTN BSTR 2029 - 8176 - GRIZBS 1,528.00 Check Total: ___t s28 AP- 00079012 MW TRUCKEE OVERHEAD DOOR INC HEAVY MAINT REPL ROLLUP DOOR 1004 - 8075 2,024.00 Check Total: _Loam 0m AP- 00079013 MW UNITED PARCEL SERVICE GEN & ADMIN POSTAGE EXPENSES 1000 - 4810 500.00 UNITEDAARCEL SERVICE GEN & ADMIN POSTAGE EXPENSES 2000 - 4810 500.00 i Check Total: 1 non 00 AP- 00079014 MW UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC HEAVY MAINT TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1004 - 6200 53.04 Check Total: SR n4 AP- 00079015 MW USDA FOREST SERVICE PUMPS LAND & BUILDINGS 2002 - 5010 20,924.56 Check Total: _.2a22a -56 AP- 00079016 MW V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ENGINEERING - TANK COATING TANK COATINGS 2029 - 8261 - TKCOAT 2,543.14 Check Total: 2 543 AP- 00079017 MW WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SMALL TOOLS 1003 - 6073 99.92 WEDCO INC HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 65.97 WEDCO INC ELECTRICAL SHOP SMALL TOOLS 2003 - 6073 103.48 Check Total: 2R9 47 AP- 00079018 MW WESTERN ENERGETIX INC GEN & ADMIN DIESEL INVENTORY 1000 - 0416 7,932.97 WESTERN ENERGETIX INC PUMPS DIESEL 1002 - 4620 1,326.25 WESTERN ENERGETIX INC HEAVY MAINT FILTER EQ/BLDG 1004 - 6023 67.75 WESTERN ENERGETIX INC HEAVY MAINT PUMP STATIONS 1004 - 6051 689.30 User. THERESA Page: 14 Current Date: 04/15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vendor Name Department / Prof Name Description Acct# / Prol Code A Check Num- Tvoe Check Total: in n1R 27 AP- 00079019 MW WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY MONITORING 1007 - 6110 680.00 Check Total: RAn nn AP- 00079020 MW WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY HEAVY MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES 1004 - 6071 10.09 Check Total: in ng AP- 00079021 MW WESTFALIA SEPARATOR INC HEAVY MAINT BIOSOL EQUP/BLDG 1004 - 6653 832.52 Check Total: R32 52 AP- 00079022 MW WHALEN, CHRIS ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 1021 - 6200 10.71 WHALEN, CHRIS ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2021 - 6200 10.71 Check Total: 21 42 AP- 00079023 MW WIBBY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 1007 - 4760 397.70 WIBBY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LAB SUPPLIES 2007 - 4760 483.75 Check Total: RR1 4A AP 00079024 MW WINDSHIELD PROS OF TAHOE EQUIPMENT REP AUTOMOTIVE 1005 - 6011 250.00 WINDSHIELD PROS OF TAHOE EQUIPMENT REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE 2005 - 6011 250.00 c o, __m aim Check Total: Q AP- 00079025 MW 0 WISE CONSULTING & TRAINING DIAMOND VLY RNCH - DVR HOUSE RENOVT RANCH HS REMOD 1028 - 8130 - DVRENO 866.00 Check Total: _mum AP- 00079026 MW Grand Total: 2,447,242.28 U ser MESA Page: 15 Current Date: 04 /15/2011 Report: OH PMT CLAIMS_BK Current Time: 08:41:11 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE American Express EFT Detail Vendor Name enUProi Name 291112d025 Acct 11►/Pro1 Code MAO bats WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS LUTHER PASS PUMPS STN 10024048 9.27 EFT WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY HEAVY MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS 1004-6041 116.63 EFT WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY DIAMOND VALLEY RANCH GROUNDS & MAINT 10284042 79.55 EFT WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY GEN & ADMIN BOXES, LIDS INVENTORY 2000-0403 7,136.22 EFT WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY GEN & ADMIN VALVES INVENTORY 2000 -0404 360.22 EFT WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS SMALL TOOLS 2002 -6073 11.58 EFT WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY PUMPS BLACK BART BOOSTER UPG 2002 -8169 1,752.06 EFT Total: 9,465.53 rn Page: 16 R:\ACCT1Theresa\Excel \EFT -POC \EFT & POC 4 -21 -11 Grad Manager Richard Ft Solbrig S outh Dfractore ChrisCefaki :� :�:.� =.. � . J ames R. Jones r ------- . N.. Public Utility istrict , Ma'''Lou y Dale Rise Erie Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14a TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: False Claims Act Case: United States, the States of California, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, and Tennessee and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia ex rel. John Hendrix v. J -M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A., Civil Action No. ED CV06- 0055 -GW, United States District Court for the Central District of California. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCUR! WITH REQUESTEb A • • : CATEGORY: GENERAL MANAGER: YES I NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES :'a NC i General Manager Richard FL Davie • 7. *111161 South Ta hoe anoctore Chris Cefalu * Janne R. Jones Public Utility District - May Mostachor Dale Rise FAG Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive • South Lake Tahoe • CA 96150 -7401 Phone 530 544 -6474 • Fax 530 541 -0614 • www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14b TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: April 21, 2011 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (one case) REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct legal counsel. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding anticipation of litigation. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCEMEENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO , : CATEGORY: Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES A NO -73- V 7 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ DRAFT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST { MARCH 2011 } V STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3 Project Name and Summary • 3 Lead Agency 3 Public Review 3 Further Information 4 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5 1 -1 Introduction and Setting 5 1 -2 Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Facility 7 1 -3 Land Disturbance, Land Capability and Land Coverage 7 1-4 Mitigation Measures (Design Measures) Included in the Proposed Project 8 1 -5 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required 11 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 12 2 -1 Project Name Or Identification 12 2 -2 Environmental Setting and Impacts 12 1 Land 12 2 Air Quality 16 3 Water Quality and Hydrology 19 4 Vegetation 23 5 Wildlife 26 6 Noise 28 7 Light and Glare 30 8 Land Use 31 9 Natural Resources 33 10 Risk of Upset 34 11 Population 34 12 Housing 35 13 Transportation /Circulation 37 14 Public Services 38 15 Energy 40 16 Utilities 41 17 Human Health 42 18 Scenic Resources /Community Design 43 19 Recreation 45 20 Cultural Resources 46 21 Findings of Significance 48 2 -3 Certification 49 2 -4 Written Comments (included in the body of the checklist) 49 2 -5 Determination 50 CEQA Determination 50 TRPA Determination 51 3 REFERENCES /PERSONS CONSULTED 52 References 52 Persons Consulted 52 MARCH 2011 PAGE 1 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Appendices A Detailed Project Site Plan and Elevations 53 B CEQA and TRPA Checklists Comparison 59 MARCH 2011 PAGE 2 • STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT INITIAL STUDY / INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST for the SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT PROJECT NAME AND SUMMARY The Grizzly Mountain Booster Station project consists of the construction of a new booster pump station to improve the primary water service to approximately 3,000 existing homes in the Flagpole and Twin Peaks water zones. Figure 1 shows the project vicinity of the Tahoe Paradise neighborhood located northwest of Meyers in unincorporated El Dorado County. The project increases water reliability to the Flagpole and Twin Peaks water zones by providing a second source of water to the area currently served by only one pipeline from the Arrowhead water zone (located in Meyers, CA). The new booster station is being funded by the District as the matching funds for a Fire Protection Partnership Funding / USFS Forest Health Fund grant that was used for the North Apache Booster station and Grizzly Mountain water line replacement project. With a standby pump and a diesel - powered standby generator, the Grizzly Mountain Booster Station will provide a substantial improvement to reliability and fire protection in the Tahoe Paradise area. The new station will be located at 1553 Grizzly Mountain Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. Figure 2 shows the booster station site plan. The District provides drinking water and wastewater treatment for the greater South Lake Tahoe, CA area. The proposed Booster Station building is 968 square feet and 33 feet, 8 inches high, and is designed to blend with adjacent residential structures in the surrounding neighborhood. The Booster station will be accessed by a new driveway from Grizzly Mountain Drive. The detailed project site plan and elevations are provided in Appendix A. A waterline pipeline replacement (Grizzly Mountain Water Line Replacement Project) will be constructed by the District on Grizzly Mountain Drive and North Upper Truckee Road under a separate project to connect the booster station to the existing water zones. The environmental review for the pipeline replacement has been completed under a separate contract. LEAD AGENCY The District will serve as the lead agency for the Initial Study under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency will serve as the lead agency for the Initial Environmental Checklist required under their Code of Ordinances (Chapter 5) and Rules of Procedure. PUBLIC REVIEW The Draft Initial Study/Initial Environmental Checklist will be circulated for public and agency review from March 23, 2011 to April 22, 2011. Copies of the document are available during normal operating hours at the District office located at 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. The document can be found online at the following web address: www.stpud.us. Comments on this document MARCH 2011 PAGE 3 L r STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST must be received by 5:00 p.m. on April 22, 2011. Comments can be e- mailed to jthiel stpud.dst.ca.us or sent via mail to: John Thiel Principal Engineer South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 FURTHER INFORMATION If you have further questions or require additional information regarding this matter, please contact John Thiel, District Principal Engineer at (530) 543 -6209. Figure 1: Project Vicinity ca Project Site E j * z w tJ Source: Google Maps, Accessed March 17, 2011 MARCH 2011 PAGE 4 y r STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This environmental document shall serve as a joint document that will meet the environmental review requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA). This document will serve as a Mitigated Negative Declaration (per CEQA Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) for the District, and an Initial Environmental Checklist for the TRPA (per Chapter 5 of the TRPA Code of Ordinances). 1 -1 INTRODUCTION AND SETTING The project area is located within a residential neighborhood with existing residential uses, typically single family homes, in an unincorporated area known as Tahoe Paradise — Upper Truckee. A single- family dwelling is located immediately west of the project site; a privately -owned vacant lot is located to the east. The project site fronts on Grizzly Mountain Drive, a two -lane rural street. Figure 2 shows a detailed site plan. The nearest commercial facilities are located to the southeast in the unincorporated community of Meyers, CA. Meyers was first established in the 1850's as a way station in the lower Lake Valley along the Upper Truckee River. During the 1960's, the area around Meyers was part of a grand residential subdivision plan originally developed by two corporations, Tahoe Paradise Homes and Tahoe Paradise Properties, Inc. The new neighborhoods were to be called Tahoe Paradise. Since that time the entire area is referred to as either Meyers or Tahoe Paradise, although the commercial district is generally identified as Meyers and the surrounding residential neighborhoods are generally known as Tahoe Paradise. Washoe Meadows State Park and Lake Valley State Recreational Area and Lake Tahoe Golf Course separate the Tahoe Paradise and Meyers communities. Washoe Meadows State Park is located approximately one - quarter of a mile east of the project site. The project site is located in TRPA Plan Area 132 (Mountain View) - west of Plan Area 119 (Country Club Meadow) and the Upper Truckee River, and south of Angora Creek. The nearest point on Angora Creek is approximately 2,800 feet from the project site. The Land Use Classification of Plan Area 132 is "Residential" and its Management Strategy is "Mitigation ". Each Plan Area addresses a specific land area and includes specific policies and performance standards for that area. Plan Area 132 includes two planning considerations: 1) the area has experienced major vegetative manipulation within the SEZ, and 2) the area contains seeped soils. The Plan Area includes one special policy: "this is a high priority area for SEZ restoration ". Permissible uses in PAS 132 include "Public Service" and lists local public health and safety facilities, pipelines and power transmission and public utility centers as "special uses ". The area is approximately 40 percent built out, primarily with residential uses at a density of one single family dwelling per parcel. The dominant physical feature of this Plan Area is the Angora Creek SEZ, located north of the project area. This area was substantially altered during the Angora fire of June 2007. The Plan Area is 35 percent SEZ, 60 percent moderate hazard and five percent high hazard. The land coverage is 15 percent covered and 25 percent disturbed. The project site is located just north of Plan Area 133 (Tahoe Paradise - Upper Truckee). The Land Use Classification of Plan Area 133 is "Residential" and its Management Strategy is "Mitigation ". This Plan Area is approximately 45 percent built out, primarily with residential uses at a density of one single family dwelling per parcel. The area is a mixed forest with an overstory of either lodgepole pine, Jeffrey pine, white fir or a mixture of the three. The area's land capability consists of 15 percent SEZ, 65 percent moderate hazard, and 20 percent low hazard. MARCH 2011 PAGE 5 . STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Figure 2: Booster Station Site Plan E 1 I f LOT 129 LOT 128 I I N 3GZ4bID' I' 110.00. / -- — -- l �i_ � s _'" _ ___ a /6' _ ... ice'++'- -• ....... ass ,s Meg SC NI r . tr f aim 3 pNO ea 61111 Ios 7D 0 f6 to 10 b .� - a4 —_ ........ `rte ".'..'.�.� •• . . am in w. 4444444444, CONTOUR mom on •• lim oloomos r c -- 6 ® 41124.P d1' 1 64 1 16T a.: 6+41.1' 1 ® . eT �sT �._ � OW" •e's ®,as / .'tea Mt. I I I frier - err l IS •oa.ng.o. r k"n / I LOT 135 • 2 • � It_ ., y ®J III 4 I LOT 185 4 •, T Im • s • "1 L l . . 4 ILO %-i • . !' e I 1i" I I I sas J I `- INK s.c.o. m.°` teem. 6 I i — �`..: I "-m w S r 1 � . Mr 3 _ „„ t s�T g/044 r . oN • / _ r> _ � � N_.. I II NM 611391113‘. CONCURS .."/ PO443t MC sosso SP ros - - rcu rar +Vc G R I Z Z L Y M O U T A t N D R I V E E MARCH 2011 PAGE 6 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1 -2 GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION FACILITY The Grizzly Mountain Booster Station project consists of the construction of a new booster pump station to improve the primary water service to approximately 3,000 existing homes in the Flagpole water zone. The project increases water reliability to the Flagpole and Twin Peaks water zones by providing a second source of water to the area currently served by only one pipeline from the Arrowhead water zone. Figures 1 and 2 show the project vicinity and facility layout. The detailed project site plan and elevations are provided in Appendix A. Temporary BMPs for the construction project will include site delineation fencing, as well as sediment logs or silt fence at downslope perimeters of earthwork areas, as appropriate. Vegetation protection will be installed to protect trees 6- inches dbh and larger located adjacent to the project disturbance area. During trenching activities, controls will be installed to control the migration of sediment away from the working area. The site plan shows permanent BMPs, including dripline trenches along the perimeter of the building and drywells for driveway runoff infiltration. 1 -3 LAND DISTURBANCE, LAND CAPABILITY AND LAND COVERAGE The project in its entirety will result in a total of 2,235 square feet of new land coverage. A portion of this land coverage (235 square feet) will be located outside of the project area on El Dorado County right of way in order to connect the driveway to Grizzly Mountain Drive. Table 1 outlines the allowable base land coverage as defined by TRPA Code of Ordinances Chapter 20 for the Project Area. These numbers have been developed by the District and must be verified by the TRPA. The El Dorado County Assessor Parcel Number that is included in the project area is 033 - 494 -10. TRPA has established a soil classification system based upon the Bailey Land Classification System (1974). Land capability classification delineates the amount of impermeable development coverage that may exist within a capability district. Preliminary land capability mapping (see site plan in Appendix A) shows that the project area includes SEZ, Class 3 and Class 5 lands. For analysis purposes (since the TRPA has not yet verified the land capability), the entirety of the disturbance and coverage required for the project is assumed to be located within Land Capability District 3 (worst case assumption). MARCH 2011 PAGE 7 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Table 1 Existing and Proposed Land Coverage (square feet) Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Project Area Project Area Bailey Class lb Area Bailey Class 3 Area Bailey Class 5 Area Total including Setback (5% allowable land • (25% allowable land (1% allowable land coverage) coverage) coverage) Land Capability District 12,800 1,310 7,390 4,100 Area Allowable Base Land 1,415 13 370 1,032 Coverage Existing Land Coverage 0 0 0 0 Proposed Land Coverage 2,000* 0 396 1,604 Source: STPUD, 2011 Notes: * Total land coverage with offsite driveway area located in El Dorado County ROW is 2,235 square feet. The disturbance area associated with the proposed and removed land coverage is less than 1 -acre and therefore does not require a permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Lahontan Region. For this project, RWQCB, Lahontan permitting is addressed by TRPA through an existing Memorandum of Understanding. 1-4 MITIGATION MEASURES (DESIGN MEASURES) INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED PROJECT The following mitigation measures (design measures) have been identified and added to the project to be implemented, to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure 1.a: Land Coverage Restoration - To reduce impacts from development on low capability lands, the District shall restore land coverage located on Class 3 lands pursuant to the requirements of Code Subsection 20.4.C. The amount of land coverage restoration required will be determined based on TRPA's final verification of the project area land capability, but will not be more } than 2,138 square feet based on a worst case assumption. Mitigation Measure 2.ai: Construction Equipment Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Control Plan - To ensure that emissions from construction equipment exhaust will be reduced, the following measures will be implemented: • Use alternative fuel construction equipment to the fullest extent possible. • Minimize idling time (e.g., 5 minute maximum). • Maintain properly tuned equipment according to equipment manufacturer's guidelines. • Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and /or the amount of equipment in use as specified for noise mitigation purposes. Mitigation Measure 2.aii: Particulate Matter Control Plan - To ensure that emissions of particulate matter will be minimized, the following feasible PM control measures for construction activities will be implemented: MARCH 2011 PAGE 8 • STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods. Active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non -toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. • Apply water three times daily, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. • Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. • Hydro seed or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas. • Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non -toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.). • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 5 mph. • Install fiber rolls, filtration fencing or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. • Suspend excavation and grading activity whenever the wind is so high that it results in visible dust plumes despite control efforts. Mitigation Measure 3.f. Construction Dewatering Plan. Because groundwater may be intercepted, which is the process of diverting and/or capturing the groundwater flows, dewatering, which is the removal and disposition of the water itself, may need to be implemented onsite. • If necessary, a final dewatering plan shall be further developed by the construction contractor based on the final site design. The construction contractor shall demonstrate that they have a reliable plan for dewatering as well as contingency in case that plan does not function as expected. The contractor shall have demonstrable experience in dewatering operations and evidence of such experience shall be provided to TRPA and the District with the dewatering plan. • There are a number of methods for dewatering intercepted groundwater, from drilling wells upslope to installing sheet piling to constructing temporary or permanent concrete walls with dewatering galleries installed. These decisions shall be made in collaboration with the earthwork contractor chosen to construct the Project and the earthwork contractor shall be responsible for addressing the issue effectively. Interception methods are fairly well understood. Interception strategies shall be explored and implemented in parallel with the actual dewatering strategies. Approaches to dewatering intercepted groundwater flows during construction shall include the following: holding tanks and /or full treatment by pumping into the existing WWTP system. Mitigation Measure .3j. Best Management Practices to Protect Groundwater. In order to prevent groundwater degradation, the following measures shall be implemented: • Store, maintain construction equipment (except fueling by truck) at designated staging areas; • Maintain spill cleanup equipment with fuel trucks. Cleanup fuel spills immediately; • Minimize the amount and duration of construction materials stored onsite. Store all construction materials that could adversely affect groundwater quality (e.g. paint, solvents, and fuels) on containment pallets or similar facilities that would prevent discharges to the ground in the event of a spill or leak; • Maintain spill cleanup materials onsite. Respond to spills and leaks immediately to contain and remove the pollutants from the site; and • All water resulting from construction dewatering activities shall be contained on site with barriers and basins and not allowed to enter natural drainage courses. These waters that MARCH 2011 PAGE 9 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST have not evaporated will be reused during construction backfilling or disposed of offsite in a TRPA approved location (e.g., sanitary sewer). Mitigation Measure 4.d. Prevent and control noxious weeds. In order to prevent the spread of noxious weeds, the following measures shall be implemented: • It is recommended that all District -owned or construction vehicles, including off -road vehicles, are cleaned when they come into the Basin or come from a known weed infested area. Equipment will be considered clean when visual inspection does not reveal soil, seeds, plant material, or other such debris. • Vehicles used for project are not permitted to pull off the road other than within the project site. Stage equipment to implementing ee areas. By implementing this mitigation it will p revent vehicles from introducing or spreading noxious weeds, especially cheatgrass. • All earth - moving equipment, gravel, fill, or other materials are required to be weed free. Use onsite sand, gravel, rock, or organic matter when possible. Otherwise, obtain weed free materials from gravel pits and fill sources that have been surveyed and approved by Nevada Department of Agriculture or by a botanist or ecologist at the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. • Minimize the amount of ground and vegetation disturbance in the construction areas. When the construction part of the project is completed, vegetation needs to be re- established in the footprint in order to minimize weed establishment after the removal. • Hand pull or flag and avoid weed infestations prior to project implementation. Mitigation Measure 6.ai — Construction Noise Reduction Techniques. In order to reduce construction related noise, the following measures shall be implemented: • All equipment shall be adequately muffled and maintained. • No piece of equipment which generates maximum noise levels greater than 85 dBA measured at 50 feet shall be allowed on site. Mitigation Measure 6.aii — Operational Noise Reduction Techniques. In order to reduce operational- related noise, the following measures shall be implemented: • Design the pump station to minimize generator noise during testing and power outage emergencies by installing exterior concrete walls to direct noise away from the closest residences and towards the street or open space areas. • Include an exhaust silencer and roof exhaust to minimize generator exhaust noise. Mitigation Measure 20.a. Archaeological Resources Survey. Because unknown archaeological resources may exist on the project site, a survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeological consultant within the area of potential effect prior to any ground disturbing activities. If no resources are identified during the survey, then construction may proceed without further study. If newly discovered historic, architectural or archaeological resources are identified during the site survey, project ground disturbing activities shall be delayed, if necessary, to evaluate the identified resources for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historic Resources. MARCH 2011 PAGE 10 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1 -5 OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED El Dorado County — A roadway encroachment permit will be required for the driveway access to the booster station from Grizzly Mountain Drive. A special use permit may also be required from the El Dorado County planning commission. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) — A TRPA permit for a New Public Service Facility is required. The TRPA is currently reviewing the application for the permit and will require confirmation of land capability verification before construction. California Department of Health Services (CDHS) — The CDHS issues drinking water supply permits and is a responsible agency under CEQA. This Initial Study has been prepared to comply with the Department's requirements under CEQA. The District has an existing, ongoing water supply permit that will need to be modified by the CDHS following approval of the project. California State Water Resources Control Board, Lahontan Region (Lahontan) — The project will disturb less than one acre of land and no SEZ (Class lb lands) will be disturbed. Therefore, based on a mutual agreement between Lahontan and TRPA, Lahontan will subrogate their review and permitting authority to TRPA. MARCH 2011 PAGE 11 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The following analysis has been prepared using an expanded version of the TRPA initial environmental checklist form. Issues covered with this checklist include issues required by CEQA. Appendix B includes a table that provides a reference to each TRPA checklist item for the applicable CEQA checklist item. This analysis will be used to comply with the environmental documentation requirements of the TRPA (Finding of No Significant Effect) and District (Mitigated Negative Declaration). Where necessary, mitigation measures (design measures), included in the project description, have been identified that would reduce potentially significant impacts to a less than significant level. 2 -1 PROJECT NAME OR IDENTIFICATION South Tahoe Public Utility District Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Project 1553 Grizzly Mountain Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 El Dorado County Assessor Parcel Number 033 - 494 -10 2 -2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTS The following checklist has been completed based on project data, surveys, personal communications (letters, phone conversations), and other public information as discussed in the Environmental Setting. The Environmental Setting provides a description of the existing environment at the proposed project site and is provided following each section heading. All checklist answers include written comments. The checklist combines the checklist included in CEQA Appendix G with the TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist template so that it includes each of the topics and issue items contained in both checklists. This checklist utilizes the TRPA checklist as a base and adds or expands upon the issue items and topics with the Appendix G- specific issues to ensure comprehensive analysis is achieved. 1 Land Tahoe Basin Although the northern and central portion of the Sierra Nevada is not in an active uplift stage, earthquake history suggests that a major earthquake with a magnitude of 7.0 or 8.0 on the Richter scale should be considered a probable future occurrence in the Truckee Basin. It is estimated that a 7.0- magnitude shock will occur about every 110 years on average; however, no earthquakes of that magnitude have occurred in the Truckee Basin in the past 200 years. An earthquake in the Truckee Basin has the potential to affect the Tahoe Basin. Booster Station Site The Grizzly Mountain Booster Station site is located on a residential parcel of approximately 0.3 acres at an elevation of 6,100 feet above mean sea level (msl). The site is situated adjacent to Grizzly Mountain Drive on forested land on a ridge between Fallen Leaf Lake and Washoe Meadows. MARCH 2011 PAGE 12 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A Geotechnical Investigation for the Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Project was prepared for the District to detertnine general soil and ground water conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the project (CME, 2/10/11). Based on the topographic map, the building footprint area slopes in a northerly direction with an approximate 15 percent slope gradient. The total elevation differential across the proposed building footprint is about 7 feet. As shown on the elevations in Appendix A, the building will be constructed using an extended foundation stemwall and will not require importing fill other than for structural support. As the proposed building footprint slopes down in a northerly direction away from Grizzly Mountain Drive, substantial excavation will not be required. The project site lies near the eastern base of the Sierra Nevada, within the western extreme of the Basin and Range. Based on CME's review of the Geologic Map of the Lake Tahoe Basin in California and Nevada (Saucedo, G.J.), there are no mapped faults trending through the project site. The closest fault is located less than 1 mile west of the proposed booster station. This fault is trending in a near north to south direction and has been mapped as a concealed fault. Table 1 describes the existing, proposed, and allowable land coverage associated with the project area. 1. Land. Will the proposal result in: a. Compaction or covering of the soil beyond the limits allowed in the land capability or Individual Parcel Evaluation System (IPES)? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Table I outlines the allowable, existing, and proposed land coverage for the project area. These calculations have not yet been verified by the TRPA (the District submitted an application in March 2011). While Table 1 shows the proposed land coverage in both Land Capability Districts 3 and 5, for worst case analysis purposes, it is assumed that all proposed land coverage is located in Land Capability District 3. Therefore, the proposed land coverage (2,000 square feet) is above the base allowable land coverage (575 square feet if all non -SEZ land is determined to be Class 3). Therefore, the proposal requires restoration of Class 3 land coverage pursuant to TRPA Code of Ordinances Subsection 20.4.A(2)(e) as described below. TRPA Code of Ordinances Subsection 20.4A(3) provides for exceptions to the Class 3 land coverage prohibition for public health and safety projects. In order for TRPA to permit the proposed project, Subsection 20.4.A(3) findings must be made for each affected parcel. TRPA Code of Ordinances Subsection 20.4A(3) states: Public Service Facilities: Land coverage and disturbance for public service facilities may be permitted in Land Capability Districts la, 2c, 2 and 3 if TRPA finds that: (a) The project is necessary for public health, safety or (b) There is no reasonable alternative, including relocation, which avoids or reduces the extent of encroachment in Land Capability Districts la, lc, 2 and 3; and (c) The impacts of the coverage and disturbance are fully mitigated in the manner prescribed by Subparagraph 20.4A(2)(e). The findings for subsections 20.4A.(3)(a), (b) and (c) are provided below: MARCH 2011 PAGE 13 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 20.4A(3)(a): The proposed project will improve domestic water service to the Tahoe Paradise neighborhood and provide adequate fire flows to these residents and surrounding areas which is necessary for public health and safety. 20.4A(3)(b): There is no reasonable alternative for reducing land coverage associated with the proposed booster station — 1) the booster station must be sited between the two water zones that it will serve — Flag Pole and Twin Peaks and 2) the Booster Station has been designed as small as possible and located close to Grizzly Mountain Drive with adequate space for District vehicular access. 20.4A(3)(c): The impacts of the proposed Class 3 land coverage will be mitigated as prescribed by Subparagraph 20.4A(2)(e). Subsection 20.4A(2)(e) states: The impacts of the coverage and disturbance are fully mitigated through means including, but not limited to, the following: (i) Application of best management practices; and (ii) Restoration, in accordance with Section 20.4.C, of land in Land Capability Districts la, Ic, 2 and 3 in the amount of 1.5 times the area of land in such districts covered or disturbed for the project beyond that permitted by the coefficients in Subsection 203A. The finding for subsection 20.4A.(2)(e) is made below: Best management practices are proposed for installation in conjunction with implementation of the project and are shown on the site plan in Appendix A. Land coverage restoration in a quantity sufficient to offset the Class 3 overage within the Project Area (1.5 square feet restored for every 1 foot of land coverage over allowable limits) will be required. If the entirety of the developed portion of the project area is verified by TRPA to be Class 3 lands (worst case assumption), then land coverage restoration in the amount of 2,138 square feet will be required (1,425 X 1.5). This restoration requirement will be reduced if a portion of the developed project area is verified to be Class 5 lands. Mitigation Measure La: Land Coverage Restoration - To reduce impacts from development on low capability lands, the District shall restore land coverage located on Class 3 lands pursuant to the requirements of Code Subsection 20.4.C. The amount of land coverage restoration required will be determined based on TRPA's final verification of the project area land capability, but will not be more than 2,138 square feet based on a worst case assumption. b. A change in the topography or ground surface relief features of site inconsistent with the natural surrounding conditions? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Grading for the booster station construction will not result in permanent changes to the site topography. The area within the proposed construction site is relatively flat and slopes downhill away from Grizzly Mountain Drive. Therefore, substantial excavation is not required for the booster station. c. Unstable soil conditions, substantial soil erosion, or loss of topsoil during or after completion of the proposal? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X MARCH 2011 PAGE 14 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Construction of the proposed booster station will result in temporary unstable soil conditions. In conjunction with the project, Best Management Practices (BMPs) are proposed to limit the erosion of onsite soils, reduce the tracking of soil offsite and reduce impacts to water quality. Proposed BMPs include pavement, curb and gutter and other drainage features within the project footprint, and drainage features to convey runoff generated from the proposed structures and access areas to detention facilities. Temporary BMPs are included in the project description and design plans. Daily housekeeping and permanent revegetation measures will also be implemented in association with the project. d. Changes in the undisturbed soil or native geologic substructures or grading in excess of 5 feet? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Excavation for project facilities (to a depth of approximately 2 feet for placement of structural foundation fill) would not result in changes to previously undisturbed soils outside of the project footprint, and would not result in grading in excess of five feet in depth. A small amount of over excavation and structural foundation fill will be required for construction of the proposed booster station foundation. A geotechnical exploration was performed in November 2010 and included one boring in the vicinity of the proposed building (CME 2011 -File 1265). The boring went to a depth of 15 feet and did not encounter groundwater. e. The continuation of or increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Lands disturbed by construction activity will be covered with structures or pavement. Implementation of the standard Best Management Practices as noted above will prevent the potential for erosion during construction and on soils disturbed during construction. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion, including natural littoral processes, which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of a lake? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project will not result in any changes to natural littoral processes or modify channels of any streams or rivers as there are none within the project area. MARCH 2011 PAGE 15 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. Exposure of people or structures to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, expansive soil, landslides, backshore erosion, avalanches, mud slides, seiche, tsunami, ground failure, or similar hazards? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project will not result in exposure of people or structures to geologic hazards as there are no active faults within or adjacent to the project area. A geotechnical investigation was performed for the project site by CME in November 2010 and concluded that geologic hazards are minimal. The geotechnical investigation recommended design features for the foundation of the Booster Station building. h. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Septic tanks and alternative wastewater disposal are not proposed for the project. 2 Air Quality Tahoe Basin For the Tahoe Basin, the main criteria air pollutant of concern as described by the California Air Resources Board is carbon monoxide (CO). CO is an odorless gas that impairs the uptake of oxygen into the bloodstream by binding about 700 times stronger to respiratory tissues than oxygen. The effect on the human body is to cause chest pain in heart patients, headaches, and reduce mental awareness. The other criteria pollutant of concern as defined by the California Air Resources Board in the Tahoe Basin is ozone (0 However, high ozone levels occur only in the Washoe County portion of the Basin. Although particulate matter (PM is a monitored criteria air pollutant, PM levels in the Tahoe Basin do not exceed state or federal standards. The TRPA has established several environmental thresholds related to air quality. These thresholds are defined in the Tahoe Compact as "environmental standard[s] necessary to maintain a significant scenic, recreational, educational, scientific or natural value of the region or to maintain public health and safety within the region." The thresholds are generally expressed as regional or sub - regional environmental standards. The TRPA adopted formal goals and policies that are intended to guide decision - making in a manner that will provide for attainment and maintenance of the environmental thresholds. While the thresholds and goals are regional in nature, the policies can be considered and/or implemented during decision - making regarding individual projects. Greenhouse gas emissions (and sequestration) inventories are not available specifically for the Tahoe Basin. However, in consideration of the statewide emissions, the most likely contributing MARCH 2011 PAGE 16 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST factors for greenhouse gas emissions within the Project area are transportation activities (automobile and truck trips) and electricity consumption. Booster Station Site The booster station site is presently undeveloped with no manmade sources of criteria air contaminants or greenhouse gases present. 2. Air Quality. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air pollutant or greenhouse gas emissions or exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Construction activities at the project site would result in short -term air pollutants (particularly particulate matter — PM, and greenhouse gas emissions (CO These emissions would be emitted from construction vehicles and equipment, and from dust that may result from temporary ground disturbance. Operation of the proposed booster station will not result in a substantial increase in greenhouse gas or air pollutant emissions. All equipment to be used at the site, including the pump, meets existing CA state standards and will be powered by electricity generated by offsite sources. The standby diesel generator will meet state emissions standards and will only be used during monthly tests and in case of an emergency power outage. The new facility will result in one new maintenance or operational vehicle trip per day. The facility will not conflict with any policy adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Standard Mitigation Measures 2ai and 2aii shall be implemented as necessary to control emissions. Mitigation Measure 2.ai: Construction Equipment Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Control Plan - To ensure that emissions from construction equipment exhaust will be reduced, the following measures will be implemented: • Use alternative fuel construction equipment to the fullest extent possible. • Minimize idling time (e.g., 5 minute maximum). • Maintain properly tuned equipment according to equipment manufacturer's guidelines. • Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and/or the amount of equipment in use as specified for noise mitigation purposes. Mitigation Measure 2.aii: Particulate Matter Control Plan - To ensure that emissions of particulate matter will be minimized, the following feasible PM" control measures for construction activities will be implemented: • Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods. Active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non -toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. • Apply water three times daily, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. MARCH 2011 PAGE 17 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. • Hydro seed or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas. • Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non -toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.). • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 5 mph. • Install fiber rolls, filtration fencing or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. • Suspend excavation and grading activity whenever the wind is so high that it results in visible dust plumes despite control efforts. b. Deterioration of ambient (existing) air quality, violate air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation (particularly in an non - attainment area) or conflict with or obstruct the implementation of an air quality plan? Yes No No, with Data ry Mitigation Insufficient X Construction of the booster station and related infrastructure would result in a temporary increase in particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and potentially ozone. Operation of the facilities will not result in additional air pollutant emissions beyond nominal operational and maintenance vehicle trips and emissions from offsite power generation facilities. Implementation of mitigation measures 2.a.i and 2.a.ii is required for short -term construction related impacts. c. The creation of objectionable odors? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Operation of the proposed booster station not will result in the generation of objectionable odors because there will be no odor - generating activities or other odor sources present at the site. d. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project does not include activities or operations that would alter air movement or weather patterns in the local or regional area. e. Increased use of diesel fuel? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X MARCH 2011 PAGE 18 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Construction of the project would not require significant use of diesel fuel burning equipment as this use would be temporary (e.g., only during the construction period). Periodic testing or emergency operation of the backup diesel generator would use a nominal amount of diesel fuel, but the impact would not have a significant impact on diesel fuel supplies. 3 Water Quality and Hydrology Tahoe Basin The Lake Tahoe Basin is a bowl- shaped watershed, characterized by steep, north /south trending mountain ranges to the east and west, with Lake Tahoe occupying nearly 40 percent of the area. Within the basin, 63 individual watersheds (110 when the intervening areas that flow directly to the lake are included in the count) contribute their flow to Lake Tahoe. The climate consists of long, relatively mild winters with short, dry summers. Most of the area's precipitation comes in the form of snow, with occasional thunderstorms during the summer months. The western portions of the basin receive between 35 and 80 inches of precipitation per year, while the eastern portions receive between 20 and 35 inches. The higher amounts of precipitation occur in the upper elevations. Natural drainage systems surrounding Lake Tahoe (e.g., Angora Creek and the Upper Truckee River) convey surface and subsurface runoff from rain and melting snow that slowly erodes the land. Sediment, dissolved minerals, organic litter, and nutrients are transported through the drainage courses and stream environment zones (SEZ) to Lake Tahoe. Delta marshes of tributary streams filter these sediments and nutrients whereby they are used for plant growth. Organic materials are decomposed in the oxygen -rich lake and stream waters and nutrients are used by aquatic biota. Water quality in Lake Tahoe and its tributaries can be adversely affected by runoff from surrounding lands. Suspended sediment can cause turbidity and result in sedimentation and suspended and dissolved nutrients can stimulate algal growth and deplete the lake of oxygen in the natural process of eutrophication (increasing biologic material and depletion of oxygen over time). Booster Station Site The booster station site drains northeast toward Angora Creek. This watershed connects to the Upper Truckee River and eventually drains to Lake Tahoe. The site's proposed BMP plan will treat stormwater flows onsite and therefore, no runoff from the structures will flow off the project site. There are no significant drainage or hydrological features on the project site. A Geotechnical Investigation for the Grizzly Mountain Booster Station Project was prepared for the District to determine general soil and ground water conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the project (CME, 2/10/11). The proposed site was explored in November 2010 by drilling test borings using a truck mounted CME 55 soil sampling drill. On the booster station site, the borings were drilled to a depth of 15 feet. During the borings, the native soils were sampled in -place every 2 to 5 feet using standard samplers. The booster station site is located within glacial till deposits. The boring was drilled to a depth of 15 feet below surface grade (bgs) within the road shoulder next to the lot. The uppermost soil horizon encountered to a depth of about 7 feet bgs consists of silty sand with fine gravels. The relative density of this material is loose to medium dense. Underlying this soil stratum to the depth of exploration, poorly graded sand with silt and gravel was encountered. The relative density of this soil stratum is medium dense. MARCH 2011 PAGE 19 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water Quality and Hydrology. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X There are no streams or lakes that will be affected by the project and therefore no changes to water currents or movements will result. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, stream courses, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff so that a 20 yr. 1 hr. storm runoff (approximately 1 inch per hour) cannot be contained on the site; erosion, siltation, or flooding occur; or that capacity of existing or planned drainage systems would be exceeded? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project will involve excavation and disturbance of soils, and as such there is a potential for impacts to surface and ground water quality. These impacts will be mitigated through implementation of Best Management Practices ( BMP's). Project BMP's shall include installation and monitoring of temporary erosion protection and water quality treatment systems, permanent water quality treatment systems, and erosion controls and revegetation all in accordance with TRPA requirements. Permanent water quality treatment systems shall be designed to treat and retain the runoff associated with a 20- year, 1 -hour storm from all proposed impervious surfaces. The project includes a storm water detention facility (dripline trenching) sized to accommodate a higher quantity of runoff, to reduce the likelihood of offsite discharge to downstream properties. c. Alterations to the course or flow of 100 -year flood waters? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone and therefore will not result in the alternation of flood waters. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No change to the amount of surface water in any water body would occur as a result of project implementation as there are no water bodies impacted by the proposed project. MARCH 2011 PAGE 20 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity or violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Permanent water quality treatment systems shall be designed to treat and retain the runoff associated with a 20 -year, 1 -hour storm from all proposed impervious surfaces. The project includes a storm water detention facility sized to accommodate a higher quantity of runoff, to reduce the likelihood of offsite discharge to downstream properties. f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwater? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction. The onsite soil boring completed as part of the geotechnical investigation (CME 2011) found no groundwater to a depth of 15 feet. Excavations proposed for the Booster Station will not exceed approximately 2 feet in depth. However, if groundwater is encountered during trenching to connect the Booster Station to the adjacent water pipelines, the contractor will be required to submit a dewatering plan for District and TRPA approval prior to beginning construction, demonstrating how dewatering will be conducted to prevent impacts to water resources. Typically, a pump is placed in the excavation area and the water if filtered and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Groundwater will not be released to the stormwater system, surface waters, or to the land. Mitigation Measure 3.f. Construction Dewatering Plan. Because groundwater may be intercepted, which is the process of diverting and/or capturing the groundwater flows, dewatering, which is the removal and disposition of the water itself, may need to be implemented onsite. • If necessary, a final dewatering plan shall be further developed by the construction contractor based on the final site design. The construction contractor shall demonstrate that they have a reliable plan for dewatering as well as contingency in case that plan does not function as expected. The contractor shall have demonstrable experience in dewatering operations and evidence of such experience shall be provided to TRPA and the District with the dewatering plan. • There are a number of methods for dewatering intercepted groundwater, from drilling wells upslope to installing sheet piling to constructing temporary or permanent concrete walls with dewatering galleries installed. These decisions shall be made in collaboration with the earthwork contractor chosen to construct the Project and the earthwork contractor shall be responsible for addressing the issue effectively. Interception methods are fairly well understood. Interception strategies shall be explored and implemented in parallel with the actual dewatering strategies. Approaches to dewatering intercepted groundwater flows during construction shall include the following: holding tanks and /or full treatment by pumping into the existing WWTP system. MARCH 2011 PAGE 21 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. Change in the quantity of groundwater, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Please see response to number 31 above. The Project will not result in any permanent interception of groundwater. h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project will not decrease or increase water supplies available to the public. The project will increase the reliability of water service to the Tahoe Paradise area. i. Exposure of people or structures to water related hazards such as flooding and/or wave action from 100 -year storm occurrence, seiches, tsunamis, mudflows, or flooding as a result on failure of a levee or dam, or place within a 100 -year flood area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project facilities are not located near the lake edge or within the 100 -year floodplain. The proposed project would not be subject to seiches, tsunamis, or mudflows, nor would it be subject to flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. j. The potential discharge of contaminants to the groundwater or any alteration of groundwater quality or violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X To prevent contamination of groundwater, standard BMPs and mitigation measure 3,j shall be implemented as necessary to minimize the potential discharge of contaminants to groundwater. Mitigation Measure .3j. Best Management Practices to Protect Groundwater. In order to prevent groundwater degradation, the following measures shall be implemented: • Store, maintain construction equipment (except fueling by truck) at designated staging areas; • Maintain spill cleanup equipment with fuel trucks. Cleanup fuel spills immediately; MARCH 2011 PAGE 22 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • Minimize the amount and duration of construction materials stored onsite. Store all construction materials that could adversely affect groundwater quality (e.g. paint, solvents, and fuels) on containment pallets or similar facilities that would prevent discharges to the ground in the event of a spill or leak; • Maintain spill cleanup materials onsite. Respond to spills and leaks immediately to contain and remove the pollutants from the site; and • All water resulting from construction dewatering activities shall be contained on site with barriers and basins and not allowed to enter natural drainage courses. These waters that have not evaporated will be reused during construction backfilling or disposed of offsite in a TRPA approved location (e.g., sanitary sewer). 4 Vegetation Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin contains a broad diversity of montane vegetation associations. The current distribution of forest associations and other vegetation associations within the Basin is determined largely by the local physical environment. Vegetation associations range from grassland and montane riparian associations to Jeffrey pine and alpine dwarf shrub. The Basin contains a number of special- status plant species, including threatened and endangered species. These species are protected through TRPA, FESA, CESA, CDFG, and/or the California Native Plant Society. Land use or activity restrictions occur in areas inhabited by these species. Booster Station Site The booster station site is undeveloped with Jeffrey pine, white fir and shrub species present. The booster station site is shown in the photograph in Figure 3. 4. Vegetation. Will the proposal result in: a. Removal of native vegetation in excess of the area utilized for the actual development permitted by the land capability system/IPES system? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X As shown on the site plan (Figure 2), approximately eight live trees (one up to 24 inches dbh) will be removed for construction of the project facilities. Tree removal is only proposed for the area to be utilized for the project facilities. MARCH 2011 PAGE 23 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Figure 3: Photograph of the Booster Station Site 0 r � 4 4 g 1 . -� i n x . S x c ± ,� •off pr efect SftPi n' '2' � 8 o �kg n b. Have a substantial adverse effect on wetlands (as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), riparian vegetation, or other vegetation associated with critical wildlife habitat through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No wetlands or riparian vegetation is present within the project site. An area of SEZ at the back of the project site will be avoided. c. Introduction of new vegetation that will require excessive fertilizer or water, or will provide a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X As required in number 44 below, new vegetation used for revegetation and landscaping purposes would be native to the project area. The native species used for revegetation and landscaping would be able to survive in the existing environment without excessive fertilizer or water as they naturally occur within the Basin. MARCH 2011 PAGE 24 i STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Change in the diversity or distribution of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro flora, and aquatic plants) or have a substantial adverse direct or indirect effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No known special status plant species exists within the project area. Project construction has the potential to introduce or spread noxious weeds. Therefore, measures shall be taken to ensure noxious weeds are not brought to the project area during construction. Up to eight live trees are proposed for removal for construction of the access driveway and Booster Station facility. The loss of eight live trees will not change the diversity of plant species on the project area. Mitigation Measure 4.d. Prevent and control noxious weeds. In order to prevent the spread of noxious weeds, the following measures shall be implemented: • It is recommended that all District -owned or construction vehicles, including off -road vehicles, are cleaned when they come into the Basin or come from a known weed infested area. Equipment will be considered clean when visual inspection does not reveal soil, seeds, plant material, or other such debris. • Vehicles used for project are not permitted to pull off the road other than within the project site. Stage equipment in weed free areas. By implementing this mitigation it will prevent vehicles from introducing or spreading noxious weeds, especially cheatgrass. • All earth- moving equipment, gravel, fill, or other materials are required to be weed free. Use onsite sand, gravel, rock, or organic matter when possible. Otherwise, obtain weed free materials from gravel pits and fill sources that have been surveyed and approved by Nevada Department of Agriculture or by a botanist or ecologist at the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. • Minimize the amount of ground and vegetation disturbance in the construction areas. When the construction part of the project is completed, vegetation needs to be re- established in the footprint in order to minimize weed establishment after the removal. • Hand pull or flag and avoid weed infestations prior to project implementation. e. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Please see the response to number 4.d. MARCH 2011 PAGE 25 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST f. Removal of streambank and/or backshore vegetation, including woody vegetation such as willows? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Construction activity would not occur within streambank areas. Such vegetation would not be affected by the project. g. Removal of any native live, dead, or dying trees 30 inches or greater in diameter at breast height (dbh) within TRPA's Conservation or Recreation land use classifications? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No trees greater than 30 inches dbh will be removed in association with this project. h. A change in the natural functioning of an old - growth ecosystem? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No trees greater than 30 inches dbh will be removed in association with this project. i. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved conservation plan? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project would not conflict with TRPA policies protecting listed species, or species of local importance. TRPA policies protect trees in the area by limiting where trees may be removed and the size of trees that may be removed. 5 Wildlife Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin provides habitat for over 250 species of resident and migratory vertebrate wildlife species. Each of these species of mammals (64), birds (168), and reptiles and amphibians (23) occurs in the region because a variety of habitats are available to meet their needs. The quality and size of these habitats generally determine the abundance if any one species or animal population. The Basin contains a number of special- status wildlife, including threatened and endangered species. These species are protected through TRPA, Federal Endangered Species MARCH 2011 PAGE 26 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Act, California Endangered Species Act, and /or California Department of Fish and Game. Land use or activity restrictions occur in areas inhabited by these species. Booster Station Site No known special- status wildlife species occur within or immediately adjacent to the booster station project area. Factors that reduce the suitability of the booster station site for special - status species include the proximity to urban development and adjacent neighborhoods, and the fragmented/urbanized nature of the environment surrounding this site. 5. Wildlife. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity or distribution of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds and land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, mammals, amphibians or microfauna)? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Construction and operation of the booster station and associated structures would not alter the diversity of species existing in the area as the structures would not remove or disturb suitable habitat for wildlife species. b. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or indirectly, on any candidate, sensitive, special - status, unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X As there are no special status, unique, rare or endangered species of animals within the project area, no adverse effects will result. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The construction of the booster station will not result in the introduction of any new species of animals into the project area. The project area is also not located in a migration corridor for mule deer or other species and will not result in a barrier to migration. The project will not result in the impeded use of native wildlife nursery sites as none exist within the project area. MARCH 2011 PAGE 27 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat quantity or quality? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Based on the project area's proximity to other urban development, the proposed Booster Station site does not support special- status wildlife. Removal of trees associated with construction of the access driveway and Booster Station would not have a substantial effect on existing wildlife habitat. e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved conservation plan? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Because there are no sensitive species within the project area, the project would not conflict with TRPA or California Department of Fish and Game policies protecting listed species, or species of local importance. 6 Noise Automobile traffic along North Upper Truckee Road and other nearby low volume residential roadways is the primary source of noise in the project vicinity. Existing land uses within the project vicinity include scattered residential housing units. The surrounding residential units are the only sensitive noise receptors in the project vicinity. The TRPA has adopted and enforced certain regulatory restrictions affecting activities in the project area. TRPA thresholds, adopted in 1982, establish noise standards for the Lake Tahoe Basin. Thresholds are achieved and maintained through implementation of TRPA's regional plan, which includes environmental noise standards that apply to certain activities in the project area. Following the adoption of the Regional Plan, the TRPA- adopted Planning Area Statement (PAS) for approximately 174 areas within the Lake Tahoe Region. Each PAS addresses a specific land area and includes specific noise standards for that area. The TRPA Code of Ordinances requires that the noise produced by any activity or combination of activities within a Plan Area may not exceed the specific PAS CNEL standard or the CNEL known to exist in 1982 — whichever is lower. For this analysis, it is assumed that noise levels exceeding the PAS noise standards by 0.5 dBA or more represent a significant impact. This project is in Plan Area 132, where the maximum CNEL is 50 dBA. TRPA has set the allowable construction hours from 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. However, there is no defined construction noise limit. MARCH 2011 PAGE 28 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Permanent or temporary increases in existing Community Noise Equivalency Levels (CNEL) beyond those permitted in the applicable Plan Area Statement, Community Plan or Master Plan or beyond the existing noise levels in the vicinity? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The booster station incorporates three vertical turbine pumps in an insulated, concrete block building, sheathed with cement board siding. The pumps will not generate significant noise detectable from the exterior of the building. The electrical transformer may produce a slightly audible hum that is normal for such installations. All noise generated under normal operation will meet the 50 dBA noise limitation for this plan area. Construction of the project will subject adjoining properties to short - term noise impacts as a result of the running of heavy equipment during site preparation and construction tools. These impacts will be similar in intensity to the construction of an ordinary single family dwelling with a similar or shorter duration. Construction hours will be consistent with TRPA exemptions. Once the station is online, there will typically be just one, 20 minute visit per day by District maintenance personnel. This impact is less than the noise generated by a typical single family dwelling. The Booster Station includes a diesel - powered generator that will operate during power outage emergencies and once monthly for testing. The building has been designed with exterior concrete walls to direct generator noise away from the closest neighbors. The generator system will include a silencer and roof exhaust to minimize noise impacts. To further mitigate noise impacts the following mitigation measures are proposed: Mitigation Measure 6.ai — Construction Noise Reduction Techniques. In order to reduce construction related noise, the following measures shall be implemented: • All equipment shall be adequately muffled and maintained. • No piece of equipment which generates maximum noise levels greater than 85 dBA measured at 50 feet shall be allowed on site. Mitigation Measure 6.aii — Operational Noise Reduction Techniques. In order to reduce operational- related noise, the following measures shall be implemented: • Design the pump station to minimize generator noise during testing and power outage emergencies by installing exterior concrete walls to direct noise away from the closest residences and towards the street or open space areas. • Include an exhaust silencer and roof exhaust to minimize generator exhaust noise. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels, including groundborne vibration or noise levels? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Noise would be generated at the project sites during project construction. Groundborne vibration would result from ground movement during construction, but would not be significantly noticeable to surrounding sensitive receptors (people) because of their distance from the project site. Operation of the project would not create significant noise levels and is considered less than significant. MARCH 2011 PAGE 29 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST c. Single event noise levels greater than those set forth in the TRPA Noise Environmental Threshold or greater than those existing in the area without the project? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Construction activities do not include the use of explosives or other materials that would cause a significant single event noise. In addition, TRPA Code Section 23.8 exempts approved construction and demolition noise from the restrictions for single noise events. Likewise, operational activities at the booster station site would not create significant operational noise with the implementation of mitigation measures. Construction activities would temporarily increase noise levels; however, these noise levels would not exceed threshold limits or be of a nuisance to surrounding land uses. d. Exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels caused by a public or private airstrip? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X There are no public or private airstrips in the vicinity of the project sites, nor are the sites located within an airport land use plan. 7 Light and Glare Tahoe Basin There are many sources of light and glare in the Tahoe Basin from urban land uses. Hotels, casinos, and other urban attractions are equipped with lighting for architectural and safety purposes. To reduce light levels, the TRPA has developed a number of lighting design guidelines (Standards 30.8) to limit light splay into the night sky and on adjacent properties. The guidelines limit the direction of lighting, the amount of lighting, and even the type of lighting to reduce negative aesthetic effects of lighting and reduce glare and the trespass of light onto other areas. Booster Station Site Existing light sources in the project vicinity include the surrounding residences. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal: a. Include new or modified sources of exterior lighting that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Safety lighting is proposed on the exterior of the building and will be of low intensity and will not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Fixtures will comply with TRPA Code of Ordinances and will be time and motion controlled. MARCH 2011 PAGE 30 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Create new illumination that is more substantial than other lighting, if any, within the surrounding area? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Refer to number 7.a. above. c. Cause light from exterior sources to be cast offsite or onto public lands? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Refer to number 7.a. above. d. Create new sources of glare through the siting of the improvements or through the use of reflective materials that would affect day or nighttime views in the area? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will be constructed of material to be consistent with surrounding residential buildings. These building materials will not contribute new sources of glare to offsite land uses. 8 Land Use Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin contains a wide range of land uses, from timber harvesting and wilderness areas to tourist accommodations and residences. Land uses are regulated by the TRPA Plan Area Statements, LTBMU Forest Plan, and County zoning and general plans, among other regulatory instruments. Both the type and size of uses are regulated, limiting urban growth so as not to detract from the natural resources and aesthetic quality of the Basin. The land use regulations governing the Basin attempt to cluster urban developments such as commercial areas and higher density residential areas together to minimize urban encroachment on the environment and to maximize efficiency in infrastructure and community development. Booster Station Site The project site is located in TRPA Plan Area 132 (Mountain View) - west of Plan Area 119 (Country Club Meadow) and the Upper Truckee River, and south of Angora Creek. The nearest point on Angora Creek is approximately 2,800 feet from the project site. The Land Use Classification of Plan Area 132 is "Residential" and its Management Strategy is "Mitigation ". Plan Area 132 includes two planning considerations: 1) the area has experienced major vegetative manipulation within the SEZ, and 2) the area contains seeped soils. The Plan Area includes one special policy: "this is a high priority area for SEZ restoration ". Permissible uses in PAS 132 include "Public Service" and lists local public health and safety facilities, pipelines and power transmission and public utility centers as "special uses ". MARCH 2011 PAGE 31 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 8. Land Use. Will the proposal: a. Include uses that are not listed as permissible uses in the applicable Plan Area Statement, adopted Community Plan, Master Plan or applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed booster station is a special use under Public Service — Local public health and safety facilities in Plan Area Statement 132 (Mountain View). At about 930 square feet, 27 feet high, and using a residential design, the Booster Station will blend with the surrounding residential structures. Due to the nature of the project and the design and construction elements implemented, the project will not change the character of the neighborhood and will be consistent with the plan area's primary land use classification of residential. The construction of the proposed booster station will add to the safety of the neighborhood by providing a reliable system for fire flows and domestic consumption. The project will have positive effects on the general welfare of the region and will not affect the enjoyment of adjacent properties. Proper safety measures will be followed in the construction of the station to protect the land, water, and air resources. All necessary design elements will be included in the design and construction of the station in order to harmonize with the neighborhood. The District has met with neighbors to explain the purpose of the project and to entertain comments and questions. b. Expand or intensify an existing non- conforming use or physically divide an established community? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Construction of the new booster station will be a conforming use. The structures would not physically divide the community. c. Convert farmland, conflict with agricultural zoning and Williamson Act contracts, or involve changes to the environment that would induce farmland conversion to non- agricultural use? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project area is not used for farming activities. There are no fanning activities or Williamson Act contracts on or surrounding the parcel. The project would not cause farmland conversion. MARCH 2011 PAGE 32 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9 Natural Resources Tahoe Basin Although there are no significant mineral or nonrenewable energy resources in the Tahoe Basin, timber resources are extensive. Booster Station Site There are no significant natural resources located on the project site. There are no known mineral resources on the project site. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. A substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resources, including mineral resources or result in the loss of availability of known mineral resources or delineated mineral resource recovery sites? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The use of natural resources such as construction wood or metals, or gasoline would increase slightly as the booster station is constructed. There are no significant mineral resources on the project sites that would be made unavailable through use of the sites. b. Substantial depletion of any non - renewable natural resource? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Some non- renewable natural resources such as gasoline and diesel would be used in the construction and operation of the facilities; however, the construction and operation of the booster station would not consume substantial amounts of non - renewable resources. MARCH 2011 PAGE 33 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT • INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 10 Risk of Upset Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin contains a wide variety of activities that have the potential to cause hazardous situations. The rural /wilderness areas are prone to wildfire, which could affect the environment, people, and structures in the area. Booster Station Site There are no hazards currently present at the project site. A slight hazard associated with construction of the booster station would be associated with the storage and use of diesel fuel. 10. Risk of Upset._Will the proposal: a. Involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Standard measures will be required during construction to ensure the proper handling of hazardous materials such as fuel and oil. b. Involve possible interference with an emergency evacuation plan? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Construction and operation of the booster station will not interfere with an emergency evacuation plan, particularly since no construction would occur within existing public roadways to cause traffic delays. c. Expose people or structures to significant risk of wildfires? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The booster station does not pose a significant risk to wildfires. The Booster Station would improve the reliability of water service in Tahoe Paradise and benefit fire flows available for future emergencies. 11 Population Tahoe Basin Population growth in the Lake Tahoe Region has been slow because of basin -wide growth - control measures, ongoing conversion of resident homes to second homes, urbanization outside MARCH 2011 PAGE 34 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST the area, and increased employee commuting to communities outside of the Basin in Placerville and Nevada. The population in the South Lake Tahoe area was approximately 23,594 persons in 2006. The growth rate has been flat over the past 10 years. Population growth in South Lake Tahoe and the surrounding region is expected to grow at a low rate due to constraints on new housing development. Booster Station Site The project will not result in a permitted increase in the capacities of any existing or planned infrastructure and therefore will not allow for any unanticipated increase in local population. The facility will add to the safety of the neighborhood by providing a reliable system for fire flows and domestic consumption to existing and planned future land uses. 11. Population. Will the proposal: a. Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population planned for the Region? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The construction of the booster station would not increase full -time staffing in the Tahoe Basin. Temporary construction related employment would increase during construction of the project. The temporary staffing associated with construction is not considered an adverse alteration of the location, distribution, density or growth rate of human population in the region because the population changes are merely temporary and do not represent a significant increase in the overall population or density in the region. b. Include or result in the temporary or permanent displacement of residents? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The Project would not result in the demolition of any residences and will not have an adverse impact on existing residents. 12 Housing Tahoe Basin According to the 2000 U.S. Census, there were approximately 14,036 housing units in the South Lake Tahoe area. Of those units, 9,447 were occupied and 4,589 were vacant, suggesting a large seasonal housing stock. Over 43 percent of the occupied housing units were owner occupied units. Housing in the South Tahoe Region ranges from simple summer cabins, rental units and timeshares to million - dollar resort homes. MARCH 2011 PAGE 35 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Booster Station Site The project site does not currently provide housing or employment opportunities. Therefore, there is currently no need for housing created by the use of the site. Adjacent land uses include residential neighborhoods and forested lands. Residences are privately owned in the vicinity of the site, and not publicly subsidized. 12. Housing. Will the proposal: a. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? To determine if the proposal will affect existing housing or create for housing, demand fo additional hour g, p lease answer the following questions: (1) Will the proposal decrease or displace the amount of housing in the Tahoe Region? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not result in any new housing or decrease in housing in the Tahoe Region. The project is intended to provide improved fire safety and domestic water service to the • region. (2) Will the proposal decrease the amount of housing in the Tahoe Region historically or currently being rented at rates affordable by lower and very -low- income households? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Number of Existing Dwelling Units 0 Number of Proposed Dwelling Units 0 The proposed project will not result in any new affordable housing or decrease in affordable housing in the Tahoe Region. (3) Will the proposal require the employment of ten or more additional individuals? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not result in the permanent employment of any new District employees. Existing District staff will oversee inspections and maintenance of booster station. Construction of the project would result in the employment of short -term contractors. The District will be MARCH 2011 PAGE 36 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST putting the project out to bid for local contractors. No additional employment will be required as a result of project implementation. b. Will the proposal result in the loss of housing for lower- income and very -low- income households? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not result in the loss of lower- income or very -low- income housing in the Tahoe Region. 13 Transportation /Circulation Booster Station Site The project site, located on a two lane residential Street (Grizzly Mountain Drive), is accessed by North Upper Truckee Road. Access to the two lane North Upper Truckee Road is provided by US Highway 50 from the south and Lake Tahoe Boulevard from the north. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of 100 or more new daily vehicle trip ends (DVTE) or exceeds service levels or capacity of street systems? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed booster station project will result in an increase of one daily vehicle trip, which would result in a less than significant impact on area traffic. Temporary increases in DVTE will occur during construction activities, but will be well below 100. b. Changes to existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking or result in inadequate parking capacity? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project would result in demand for parking to serve the once daily operation /maintenance visit by District personnel, and any additional vehicles required for periodic maintenance or refueling the diesel tank used for the emergency generator. Adequate parking will be provided within the project site for District personnel and vehicles. c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including highway, transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X MARCH 2011 PAGE 37 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The project will not have a substantial impact on existing transportation systems or facilities due to the small number of daily trips. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No changes to the neighborhood road system would occur in conjunction with the project. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project would not modify waterborne, rail, or air traffic. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians or result in inadequate emergency access? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not result in any increase in traffic hazards. Construction activities will be located on District owned property primarily outside of the roadway right of way. Emergency access to the project site and surrounding community will not be impeded during construction or upon completion of the project. g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not conflict with any adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. 14 Public Services Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin is served by a variety of public services, including numerous parks, local, state, and national recreation areas, emergency service providers, and schools. Each community within the Basin is served by local services, which can range from a city police force to a County agency to a State service agency, like the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Public services in the Basin vary by jurisdiction, although most areas are served by a combination of local, state, and federal services. The specific services available in the project area are described in detail below. MARCH 2011 PAGE 38 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Booster Station Site The area is served by the Lake Valley Fire Protection District and the El Dorado County Sheriff's Department. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an unplanned effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No changes to fire protection services would occur as a result of project implementation. The project will improve the reliability of the water service in the Tahoe Paradise neighborhood. b. Police protection? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No changes to police protection services would occur as a result of project implementation. c. Schools? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project would not increase demand for school resources as population growth would not result from the project. The project is designed to improve water service to existing homes and residents. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No changes to parks and recreational services would occur as a result of project implementation. e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No changes to non - District publicly owned facilities and roads would occur as a result of project implementation. f. Other governmental services? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X MARCH 2011 PAGE 39 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The project would not change or increase the demand on governmental services as it would not significantly increase the population in the area. 15 Energy Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin is served by a variety of energy sources and providers, mostly natural gas and electricity. Electric utility companies in the Basin include Norcal Electric Supply of Truckee, NV Energy, and Truckee Donner Public Utility District. Natural Gas service is provided through underground utility lines and cylinders. Natural Gas service providers include, but are not limited to, AmeriGas, Suburban Propane, Southwest Gas, and WP Natural Gas. Solar panels and other alternative energy mechanisms are also used in the area. Booster Station Site Service is provided to the project area by Liberty Energy (formerly Nevada Energy) and Southwest Gas Company through existing lines located along local residential roadways, including Grizzly Mountain Drive. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project would not use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. Some energy would be required to operate the facility; California Energy Commission Title 24 energy standards will be met by this project. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No substantial increase in energy demand will result due to the use of equipment meeting California state energy efficiency standards and therefore the project would not require new sources of energy. MARCH 2011 PAGE 40 4 , STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 16 Utilities Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin is served by a variety of publicly and privately owned companies providing water, sewer, communications, trash disposal, and storm water collection services. Utility districts often provide full water, sewer, and storm water collection services, while smaller purveyors may only provide water service. More remote areas of the Basin may not be completely served and may rely on individual wells or septic systems. Since the Basin contains a variety of jurisdictions, utility service is highly dependent on location and physical constraints of the area. Booster Station Site Water and sewer services in the area are provided by the South Tahoe Public Utility District. The District owns, operates and maintains the water distribution and sewer systems in the area. The project area is located within the Liberty Energy (formerly Nevada Energy) electrical service area and Southwest Gas natural gas service area. Electrical power for the adjacent residential area and the booster station site is drawn from overhead power lines. 16. Utilities. Except for planned improvements, will the proposal result in a need for new systems, substantial alterations to existing systems, or exceed permitted capacity or applicable requirements associated with the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No changes to power or natural gas systems demand would occur as a result of project implementation. The proposed facility would not require changes in existing systems. b. Communication systems? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Only minor changes to communication systems, necessary for remote operation, are required to serve the new facility. c. Water? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will be connected to the existing residential water service with related improvements to water pipelines. The water pipeline replacement is proceeding as a separate project. The booster station will improve the reliability of the water distribution system for local residents and provide for improved fire protection. MARCH 2011 PAGE 41 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Sewage treatment? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The new booster station will not require modification of the District's wastewater treatment plant to increase volume of treatment. The proposed facility is designed to be within the existing approved flows for the wastewater treatment system. e. Storm water drainage? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X New stormwater BMPs will be installed in conjunction with the project. Stormwater generated from a 20 -year, one -hour storm event will be contained and treated onsite. f. Solid waste and disposal? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project operation will not change solid waste and disposal services. All waste generated during construction will be deposited at a TRPA approved location. The public health and safety project is exempt from City of South Lake Tahoe recycling requirements for construction and demolition projects (City Code 8- 50.2.H). 17 Human Health Tahoe Basin The Tahoe Basin contains a wide variety of activities that have the potential to cause hazardous situations. Past industrial, commercial, and even agricultural operations, including gas stations and dry cleaning establishments could potentially have dumped pollutants into the ground, creating future health hazards, particularly once these areas are excavated. Other urban activities in the area require the transport of chemicals to and from their establishments. The activity of transporting chemicals for use in a photo processing shop, gasoline to a boat storage facility, or chemicals to schools or hospitals may cause health hazards if a spill or leak should occur and enter waterways or soils. Following local, state, and federal regulations regarding the handling and use of these materials is required to reduce the risk of health hazards. Booster Station Site The project site is currently vacant and does not generate hazardous materials. MARCH 2011 PAGE 42 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any human health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) through routine transport, use, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, particularly within one - quarter mile of a school? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project would not result in the creation of any human health hazard through the transport, use, emission or disposal of hazardous materials. Any hazardous materials utilized during construction (i.e. solvents, paints, cleaners, etc.) will be of such small quantities that they will not pose a health hazard. Diesel fuel necessary for the emergency generator will be contained within state approved storage containers. b. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or expose people to potential health hazards associated with site contamination? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project site is not included in the list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. There are no other health hazards associated with the booster station site. c. Exposure of people residing or working in the project area to safety hazards caused by a public or private airstrip in the vicinity? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X There are no public airports or private airstrips in the vicinity of the project. People working or residing in the project area would not be exposed to airport - related hazards. 18 Scenic Resources /Community Design Booster Station Site The project site is located in a residential neighborhood, surrounding by single- family homes. The site is wooded with Jeffrey pines and existing vegetative ground cover. Overhead electrical utility lines are located within the roadway right of way. Figure 3 includes a photograph of the project site taken from the intersection of Grizzly Mountain Drive and Little Bear Lane. MARCH 2011 PAGE 43 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 18. Scenic Resources/Conununity Design. Will the proposal: a. Be visible from any state or federal highway, Pioneer Trail or from Lake Tahoe or substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed booster station will not be visible from Pioneer Trail, US Highway 50 or from Lake Tahoe. The booster station construction will require the removal of approximately five existing trees, but will not result in substantial damage to scenic resources. b. Be visible from any public recreation area or TRPA designated bicycle trail? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project does not fall within the 75 foot buffer zone adjacent any designated bicycle trail or public recreation area. c. Block or modify an existing view of Lake Tahoe or other scenic vista? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not block or modify an existing view of Lake Tahoe or other scenic vista. d. Be inconsistent with the height and design standards required by the applicable ordinance or Community Plan? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed building is to be constructed to a TRPA measured height of 33 feet, 8 inches. This height is within the allowable maximum height of 37 feet, 7 inches defined on Table A in TRPA Code of Ordinances Chapter 22. The maximum allowable height is calculated using 16 percent slope retained across the building site and a proposed roof pitch of 8:12. e. Be inconsistent with the TRPA Scenic Quality Improvement Program (SQIP) or Design Review Guidelines? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The booster station has been designed to look like a typical single-family residential structure, with a driveway, and exterior siding and other features consistent with a single-family dwelling. The scale of MARCH 2011 PAGE 44 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST the building will be appropriate for this setting with a footprint of approximately 24 by 40 feet, and a total TRPA measured height of approximately 34 feet (e.g., similar to a two story home). Although a simple concrete block building would be easier and cheaper to build, the District has agreed to elevate the aesthetic components of the building to blend with the surrounding homes. In addition, the design incorporates most of the existing trees on the lot and new trees, bushes, or other vegetation will be installed at the completion of project construction to further improve the aesthetics of the project site. There is minimal exterior lighting for site safety which is time and motion controlled. 19 Recreation Booster Station Site The project site is not associated with any designated recreational park or activity. 19. Recreation. Does the proposal: a. Create additional demand for recreation facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of a facility would occur? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No population increase would occur as a result of this project that would increase the demand for recreation facilities. b. Create additional recreation capacity or require construction or expansion of recreation facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No population increase would occur as a result of this project that would increase the demand for recreation facilities. c. Have the potential to create conflicts between recreation uses, either existing or proposed? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No population increase would occur as a result of this project that would increase the demand for recreation facilities or cause a conflict between recreation uses. d. Result in a decrease or loss of public access to any lake, waterway, or public lands? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project will not result in any decrease or loss of public access to lake, waterways or public land. MARCH 2011 PAGE 45 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 20 Cultural Resources Booster Station Site On March 4, 2011, Steve Hilton, Archaeological Consultant, conducted a cultural resources records search at the North Central Information Center, located at Sacramento State University, for the Project. The tY> Project. area does not contain any previously recorded archaeological resources. However, the project J YP Y g area P J has never been subjected to an archaeological pedestrian survey. This records search examined the inventory of previously recorded archaeology and built environment resources near the project property. The following local, state, and federal cultural resource inventories were reviewed: • Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Directory for El Dorado County (2010), which includes properties evaluated for the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, and various other state and local registers; • The California Historic Resources Inventory (2010) • Historic American Building Survey (2010) • Five Views: An Ethnic Sites Survey for California (1988); • California Historical Landmarks (1996); and • Historic Spots in California (1990). The area reviewed included a one -half mile radius beyond the boundaries of the Project Area. The literature review identified two previously completed studies within one - quarter mile of the project and numerous archaeological surveys and recorded archaeological sites located east of the project area at Washoe Meadows State Park. As mentioned above, the project area has never been subjected to a pedestrian archaeological survey. One of the studies completed near the project area is Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Heritage Resources Report, for the Land Department's Urban Lots Management Project and was completed by Hersh Davis in 1996. The other study, A Cultural Resources Survey of 167 Acres for the Angora Fire, was completed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2007. Neither of these two studies identified cultural resources. 20. Cultural Resources a. Will the proposal result in an alteration of or adverse physical or aesthetic effect to a significant archaeological, unique geological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building, including human remains? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No known archaeological resources are within the project disturbance area and therefore no impact to known resources will occur as a result of project implementation. While the probability of the project area containing cultural resources is low, it is not possible to conclude that no archaeological resources are located within the area of potential project disturbance. Therefore, it is recommended that a cultural resources survey of the project area be completed prior to any ground disturbing activities. MARCH 2011 PAGE 46 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Mitigation Measure 20.a. Archaeological Resources Survey. Because unknown archaeological resources may exist on the project site, a survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeological consultant within the area of potential effect prior to any ground disturbing activities. If no resources are identified during the survey, then construction may proceed without further study. If newly discovered historic, architectural or archaeological resources are identified during the site survey, project ground disturbing activities shall be delayed, if necessary, to evaluate the identified resources for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historic Resources. b. Is the proposed project located on a property with any known cultural, historical, and/or archaeological resources, including resources on TRPA or other regulatory official maps or records? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Please see the response to number 20.a. c. Is the property associated with any historically significant events and/or sites or persons? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X Please see the response to number 20.a. d. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change that would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The proposed project does not have the potential to cause any physical changes that would affect unique cultural values. e. Will the proposal restrict historic or pre- historic religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X No historic or pre- historic religious or sacred uses are known within the project area and therefore no impact to these uses will occur as a result of project implementation. MARCH 2011 PAGE 47 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 21 Findings of Significance a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California or Nevada history or prehistory? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment substantially, reduce the habitat of a fish population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California or Nevada history or prehistory. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project has the potential to achieve long -term environmental goals through improved reliability of domestic water service (including fire protection) in the Tahoe Paradise neighborhood. c. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environmental is significant ?) Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project does not include impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. MARCH 2011 PAGE 48 Ii STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes No No, with Data Mitigation Insufficient X The project would not adversely affect humans. The project would positively affect humans through provision of more reliable domestic water supply. 2 -3 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �� `��`�� %• March 2011 Rob Brueck, Environmental Consultant Date 2-4 WRITTEN COMMENTS (INCLUDED IN THE BODY OF THE CHECKLIST) MARCH 2011 PAGE 49 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2 -5 DETERMINATION CEQA Determination On the basis of the evaluation presented in this document, the South Tahoe Public Utility District concludes that: The proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the general exemption, a statutory exemption, and/or a categorical exemption. If the project is categorically exempt, none of the exceptions to the exemption apply. A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION will be prepared. On the basis of the Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. On the basis of the Initial Study and implementation of all proposed mitigation measures, X there is no substantial evidence that the project as mitigated may have a significant effect on the environment. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. There is substantial evidence that the project may result in a significant environmental impact. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT will be prepared. MARCH 2011 PAGE 50 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST TRPA Determination (To Be Determined by TRPA during Project Review) On the basis of this evaluation, TRPA concludes that: a. The proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and a finding of no significant effect shall be prepared in accordance with TRPA's Rules of Procedure. Yes No b. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, but due to the listed mitigation measures which have been added to the project, could have no significant effect on the environment and a mitigated finding of no significant effect shall be prepared in accordance with TRPA's Rules and Procedures. Yes No c. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and an environmental impact statement shall be prepared in accordance with this chapter and TRPA's Rules of Procedure. Yes No Name Date Title MARCH 2011 PAGE 51 STPUD GRIZZLY MOUNTAIN BOOSTER STATION PROJECT INITIAL STUDY /INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3 REFERENCES /PERSONS CONSULTED REFERENCES Construction Materials Engineers, Inc. February 10, 2011. Geotechnical Investigation — Grizzly Mountain Water Line Replacement and Booster Pump Station. Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board. 1995. Lake Tahoe Basin Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). TRPA. 1987 as Amended. Regional Plan for the Lake Tahoe Basin: Code of Ordinances, http: / /www.trpa.org /default.aspx ?tabindex =2 &tabid =172 TRPA. 1987 as Amended. Regional Plan for the Lake Tahoe Basin: Plan Area Statements, http: / /www.trpa.org /default.aspx ?tabindex =6 &tabid =204 TRPA. 9/23/87. IPES Field Evaluation Form. APN 33- 494 -10. USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1974. Soil Survey, Tahoe Basin Area California and Nevada. PERSONS CONSULTED John Thiel, Principal Engineer, South Tahoe Public Utility District MARCH 2011 PAGE 52 LOT 129 LOT 128 ... arc. AM 1511401 01•140 1..N MAO OA WON 111•4 ENBUTISCLICKIII — �IrMW' C WO' 4C UPI m41r •10• ~MP; 1••• 011070 MONO Oat — APP. SS-NO-10 a 1y rwa•1 MP 101 000100111. MD SW 04 a _^. .. - ._._.......... N1.06 COAA•Q CAL•MATION aA. 6 w • f f ....- ._ - -- 1 �]rf N '.. _ 10N. NR 40O••4 00111MwR .4 , Ate r ' .- "•TTt .. ae_ ,`_ .._ _._..._.._._ O 06tCON • ••rt1[ __ �,• • 9Dp .._.. I ®ft meow N.41 MINA W 4W•yJ6LpLp(RY(Q rr) POOMADS LEGEND ..., •11j., I •••■• 0 MO OW - , MO AMA w0 0 •Y .•c1A• IN NI an 1�@' ■A<A' f4)1 AT *1ST �If SO ' 111•01.00•10 •. w C • X1 II',X" `.. 0 14 1 RV LP tRCK Mt P At .- - . ,.1Y..._..�.1.1 . —.• - -. ------ P.N.! WPM UM 011 . 101 t0'P IT I %t — I _IXrY t, 1 3» , m AX MINA ? COW/1M IOW 1 • �. A CONTROL PONr ' � ' II 7+ 1� ...._._._ ..............._.. 11 om�re 00. (w. It.) /--- OT , POT(MINI (MINIM LOT 135 R / _ •n `t. ....., _4 I ._ LOT 185 NW. MAO "1°a"° , Ni.pr. ..N R. COM ''l *el .. �I!!!�!'• i ;, , I I r• 1•••••041 f r 6R AMO.O MVO a.igfw CO, • *a • \' R ... • 41Ws1• w�""' iK111M41• •, A ,rZ t(ip ,•.,, r •tlfp1N! .IIrA BMX WNNu • I r it .41+ cw 41 TOMO m r v I.,K w4e •001 3......1110402.1 f •AM •m OW WO aw 1*. I I V •601141 1/161 4• r 1•1/r m1410 1m0 4r�. • 0.1: 4p�R41 40�1AR.0P� w• 111104 a' Ple - I 6 a I M 6 m MOO u r r ra 6a••A ;..;=t M[ MIOMOI 4.0110••• I•RM M-0.�O1� lir / C � 0 V A 011'YOl f • Y• 1.1A' b.Mp sa w41wcnw . a• w iI _� i ' I i `.'§, ) (BA }{ I • =t* � � `` 1}0•.1 I a tr.zo .® ' w. � I s y*� (i : ,'°'. �"'" - •N ,, nor +M. , f ,, ,, ,gam •x41.10 r muo,. ,_.;L___ y t t.t out. r ^ k ., `d ='. S • / .�... «CON�Y.S , na eb't a s a Y Rte_ SS'. l R ��i° . , . • i t '"*a j� —� ".. off { x141• -< I•• rdf , , A ^ry ^ . I AIM COP GRI ZZL Y MOUAI\TAIN DRIVE • PAGE 14 MARCH 2011 h h w cD a i eee • • E .,i . a � 0. „.. : _ 41E4 I = 6 - 4 0 116 . 1 1 = • A . n . 4 tJ! ; f ;3 iil ':I i s jF ��t ;t 1 j . ; f :Lill j� s ~lai�t I h J / I l l S . ill 1 10 aI1( 1 R 11 1 ! R � l 1 0 1 li vio '' 1 III ' 1 il WON! ilm /83 1 ge 1 11 1 K : " ig i r "1 " il idli v i ii 1 Lill g il 3 Lim N A i len!qi eenee F V 2 S'8 = V t a ~ CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT n wEwSET cwmmsr 2424 INTAKE . 3- A ..,41111111 II, Alicinotafflusib., co INN • PIP EDGE .411111111111111 2 ..,,,.. 2 1111111•1111111c. 0 ~��~_ ��� o� w� ~� 8 . "iyai OW) __ ( ! nwCIx °w MP) ___' _--_ __--_-____-____' '____ �+ -__-_'______'__ _'__-____-____-______-_'__ -__ __ _-'__-_ _-___-_-_' _____ �------' — - lDE« NFL MP� -- ---' --- -- NN — ' --�----- — � a) 2 - '---- --' '' - ------ ---- -------------'--------- ____ . � _` ___ I ^| —} �f- 7 — -� oOnw�~p�m�wm�w �omn� s��xnmR MARCH 2011 PAGE 56 i—CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT —PLUMBING VENT TOP OF ROOF bErirG6LaILABIN. I 1 1 1 I .. . ■ . , : 1 i i ... • ■ i ' i I SLOPE ACROSS SRE • 16% i , 1 i • . . • • , 1 R ICH ALLovoitE R mai &12 . yr.,. i ■ i : : ; : . . . • . . . : 1 i : : : .• '. : : 1 1 . i i . i , : 1 • i i : 1 : .: 33 PROPOSED HEIGHT • 3.3 ' 1 i . . . , 1 ANDINd SEAM METAL RI1Of OVER ICE & i : . 1 ATER SHIELD AND PLYV/?0D ISHERTHING i I I 1 • i I I I 1 I II 1 MI IiIii! . I I I • i i , i ■ .. , [ .7 :. 1111 12: (11") ISI ,,,,,•,,,, RIM Al - • • OM • & ________............__ ...■., ........................ ......_ _____....... ______ .___ ...........____ .._ ....... ..._ _. ........ 0 ---- 7.7.17. .... .. o..• TRIM RAIL Iii, ............ ... .... . . .. ....... ........ .. ... ...... ......... .. . . ....... V I li ti' 0° 4 3 1 1 7 I. Zi..A.41 .,.. " - IL • _. _t f . ......... LOUVER OPENING BEHIND ___ ...._ FINISH GRADE ---- --- ..... --- ___, i il - --- .— EXISTING •• FINISH GRADE -"-* ---- --- - - ---. ---. --- . EAST Fl EVATION —_ --- --- -.._ -- --. ___ __ -._ —.. ___ EXISTING .. FINISH GRADE • MARCH 2011 PAGE 57 , r -- coM*xUous room vE►rt � '' coca oaA�T — �uw. VENT ! I I ! • " j ; I i • i 'a'"K w � 00Fl• 1111 , SOKIII# ME R IOC 0at [E Is Vat M I _ — WE MICE I`....'.....:;.:. W _...,... W -___ Iwo 1 __ IcoAort OCANO SONG ai • alp .+ - - Off STARS — • _'°`_�'___.__°_°"° ._..___— __._ _— _________.T -- ..... — I . I -- -- -- e0TIOM OF dory VW e' — --- _- — — — -- - cana�a caw MP) WEST ELEVATION M ARCH 2011 PAGE 58 APPENDIX B CEQA and TRPA Checklists Comparison The following table lists each CEQA Checklist item and references each CEQA Checklist item to the section in which it is addressed in the TRPA initial environmental checklist within this document. CEQA Checklist Item TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist I. Aesthetics a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 18c b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock 18a outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its 18c surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or 7a nighttime views in the area? II. Agriculture a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance 8c (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 8c c. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or 8c nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? III. Air Quality a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 2b b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected 2b air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which 2b the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 2a e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 2c IV. Biological Resources a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on 4d, 4e, 5b, 5d any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural 4b, 4f community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 4b 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? MARCH 2011 PAGE 59 CEQA Checklist Item TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or 5c wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a 4a, 4g, 4h, 5e tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural 4i, 5e Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. Cultural Resources a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as 20a, 20b, 20c defined in § 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource 20a, 20b, 20c pursuant to § 15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique 20a, 20b geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 20a VI. Geology and Soils a.i. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk lg of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. a.ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk lg of loss, injury, or death involving: Strong seismic ground shaking? a.iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the lg risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? a.iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the lg risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? lc c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as lc a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building lg Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative lh waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a 2a significant impact on the environment? a. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of 2a reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? MARCH 2011 PAGE 60 CEQA Checklist Item TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine 10a, 17a transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably l0a foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, l0a substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled 17b pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been 17c adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety 17c hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response 10b plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving 10c wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? IX. Hydrology and Water Quality a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 3e b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater 3g recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through 3a, 3b the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through 3b the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or 3b planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 3j g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood 3i Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect 3i flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving 3i flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? MARCH 2011 PAGE 61 CEQA Checklist Item TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? lg X. Land Use and Planning a. Physically divide an established community? 8b b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with 8a jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community 4i, 5e conservation plan? XI. Mineral Resources a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to 9a, 9b the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site 9a, 9b delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XII. Noise a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established 6a, 6c in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or 6b groundborne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above 6a levels existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project 6a vicinity above levels existing without the project? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been 6d adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people 6d residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XIII. Population and Housing a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by 11a proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of 12a, 12b replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement 1 lb housing elsewhere? XIV. Public Services a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d, 14e, provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically 14f altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities? MARCH 2011 PAGE 62 CEQA Checklist Item TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist XV. Recreation a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or 14d other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion 19a, 19b of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVI. Transportation/Traffic a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and I3a, 13c capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by 13a, 13c the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or 13e a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous 13f intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? 13f f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? 13b g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation 13g (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVII. Utilities and Service Systems a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality 16d Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or 16c, 16d expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or 16e expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements 16c and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may 16d serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's 16f solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 16f XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, 21a substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or MARCH 2011 PAGE 63 r CEQA Checklist Item TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively 21c considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects 21d on human beings, either directly or indirectly? MARCH 2011 PAGE 64 4/21/2011 G r1771v MOimtain PA r r r Draft Initial Study /Initial Environmental Checklist Hold Public Meeting to Receive Comments 4 •NIIIIIIILA • Purpose of Project -fe yc) "Cr►,4 • Funding Considerations • Project Timeline • Comments Received • Schedule • Open to Public Comments 1 1 4/21/2011 • Purpose • Improve reliability and fire flow to the Tahoe Paradise Area • Provide redundant water systems • Forest Fire 44,c J' y� I^ I-4 u►-y • Failure of San Bernardino Pipeline . s "� ° — r `��' ° "v1'� -� • Utilize higher quality and more abundant wate resources �, �� ` i �1 • Proactive approach to reliability and fire protection Funding Considerations 5/.2cV D 2 • 4/21/2011 Project Timeline • Flagpole Combined System Reliability Improvement Plan - 2006 • Identified the need for the booster station • Project Placed on io year Capital Improvement Program List • Project Priority elevated • Angora Fire • USFS Funding )-> a h J • PreDesign /Planning - Aug 2010 • Property Search begins - Oct 2010 • Vivian Seifert, Century 21 • Purchase Negotiations on 1553 Grizzly Mtn. - Dec. 2010 • Board Approves Lot Purchase for $140,000 - Jan 2011 • Predesign Continues - Jan 2011 • HBA begins Environmental assessment - Feb 2011 3 4/21/2011 • • Design Begins - Feb 2011 • Draft Initial Study /Environmental Checklist - Mar 2011 • State Clearing House • Agencies • Tahoe Tribune • Letters to Homeowners • Neighborhood Meetings • April 20, 2011 • April 23, 2011 • Board Meeting April 21, 2011 u I i s Comments Received • Why build here? • Location very important for project engineering and economics • Existing Water System • Pressure Zones • Elevation • Grizzly Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) • Additional costs to connect booster to distribution system • Approximately $250 per foot 4 • 4/21/2011 p pPM IMIIIIII II I.E.R- _ -- • Alternate use of property • High Capability lot • Some Stream Environment Zone (SEZ) in Back • 3,5 sf of allowable coverage • Large Home construction • Adjacent lot for sale 1 Comments Received • Building is too tall and /or looks industrial 5 4/21/2011 ._ . . . . , . , Proposed Building Elevation CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 7'' 2424 EXHAUST FAN LOUVER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM A dak, wpm 11 . 419''r■ i "nith , 0 TRW • ORP EIXE 0 FASCIA ' .40. alialti.... 0 TRIM 0 GAM FACE Sa'al "G 4 ,..v r- Ofmamomminammil i neri l iMmiktimN . COENT ErD 0 I _ - 1111111 III III i :TR.: M We 1111•1111 1 M (,) TRM AT WINDOWS MEE 1111 6 II = . , V r 12 N4) COCRS •T =11= , r , 9, .......= . =1J1= . 1352a® Ill " = ' i• -••••,...----- ■ •••• AM 441, '''' t SUXE ntr4,54/1 . r: 61 "T4:49 iii 0 5.4011-ELEYELO W Aniii.....,.....,..,...-k , " North Apache Booster Station . . .. . I IR 4 ' ' S ..,` ' 'it ■ . !"; r , •. ... , ,.. t • . -,._.. . ' ' ' ,IR ' * ' • '' ' Or' I a f I . ■ ' a . • - t . INN - 1 " - • • r, -• 4— ' II - - 1-4 "' • , -, •••• a i , . - , , . • .- . . vrt': .t.4 ' -. ' . , • 4'V - ' T • .... - ..- . - • " - - ' - . , ... . -- . .„. ' AI . 6 • 4/21/2011 Building Elevation Option based on Public Comments CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 2424 EXHAUST FAN LOUVER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM ■ Allah. 41 TRM 12 Qtr °'�' • ' • illb. 0 TF1M O GRIP EDGE .1111111_ 11:�111. 8' .411111111111E1111111111111, OFASCA d1111111111f11uu_ 1111111111111.. 4111111111111111111111 111111111111•1D. TqM O coal racE SHAME SOW Al "111111111111111111111111 1111111/111111111111► � ttf u�1nu:rnui�uuruu(ruu: rauirm ■:>rmnn 19 -8' 11 111110101M11 , SILL ID i 0 "areal •..R' �R• ,R•I STOW 41.-ii a ■c• 1 1 1 SOUTH ELEVATION Comments Received • Light Pollution 7 4/21/2011 Comments Received • Noise Pollution Schedule • Receive additional comments - Apr. 21 • Comment period closes - Apr. 25 • Board Certification - May 5 • TRPA Approvals - May 2011 • Construction Contract - June 2011 • Complete Construction - March 2012 8 • 4/21/2011 9 4/ 21 / 2011 J c46 Uin RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Supplemental EIR March 2011 Supplemental EIR (SEIR) • The SEIR will be used to satisfy: • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requirements • State Water Quality Control Board requirements • Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) loan conditions 1 4/21/2011 SEIR Actions • Project Description(s) • Update Master Plan Projects 1 and 2 P J � rF • Add Master Plan Project 24 — Power Generation • Project - Specific Analysis �- • Identify potentially significant impacts; and • Determine mitigations to offset impacts to a less than significant level • Public Circulation & Comment • Board Certification (future) - 44 Env Process ( Prepare Project Description Admin Draft SEI' District Review I Draft SEIR Draft SEIR Circulation Board Hearing to 'eceive Comment 2 4 Environmental Process i Admin Final SEIR District Review Final SEIR J ! Board Certification SEIR) Statue of Limitations Future Actions Receive comments on SEIR • Respond to comments /prepare Final SEIR • District Board Certification of Final SEIR • District Board Approval of Revised Master Plan • Implementation of Master Plan Projects 1, 2 and 24 3 Y 4/21 /2011 k Project Map K f ' F4' 2. 8 UN�wud V.11 wyY �' , 4tiy ICHn N.V s. e� _ r _ vex« g , APE Y '� v iR4iEe CiY:>bI:N , IA `3 t s a,zz,x SEIR Summa Revised Master Pla Pro 1 an 2 (project components 11, 18, 19) • New Master 8) Plan P roject 24 roj (project c omponent 2 • New Significant an Unavoidable I t o Land Use and Visual Resources Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Revisions 4 4,2102011 Significant Impacts . Geological hazards associated with active faults 0 Potential degradation of groundwater quality O Potential degradation of surface water quality in West Fork Carson River @ Potential impacts to biological resources (TES, CNPS, migratory bird nests) • Potential impacts to cultural resources • Potential impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands • Impacts to visual quality • Impacts to land use Mitigation Monitoring Plan • Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) • Use District's standard practices and identified mitigations to decrease impacts to level of less than significant • 35 Standard practices • 13 Mitigations • GW -iA and GW -iB : Modified due to changes in Master Plan Projects i and 2 • LU -i, VOS -i, VOS -2: New measures identified in the SEIR • Incorporate into Revised Master Plan following project approval by District Board 5 4/21/2011 s _ RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN SEIR COMMENTS /QUESTIONS? 6 STPUD Board Meeting April 21, 2011 Grizzly Mt. Booster Station For the Grizzly Mt. Booster Station project I have concerns on the process and on the findings in the draft environmental document. I was not noticed on the Booster Station project even though our home is less than a block away. Because of that and because of the need for additional information, I am requesting that you extend the public comment period for 30 days. The recent extension of the comment period by one business day is not adequate. I would like to give you some preliminary comments on my concerns. The site selection process is not clear to us. The selection of this site for an industrial type facility in a quiet rural residential neighborhood isn't acceptable. We believe there are other sites in the proposed area that would have less impact on residential neighborhoods. We ask that this issue be re- examined. In contrast, the Twin Peaks Booster Station is in a commercial /industrial area. The Apache Station is close to Highway 50 and commercial sites. Even if it was not intended, the purchase of the land prior to project review and approval combined with the planned contracting for the pipeline to this location has resulted in the impression that the Booster Station project is being steam rolled over us. This doesn't provide the transparency and accountability needed for open government processes. The draft environmental document states that "the District has met with neighbors to explain the purpose of the project and to entertain comments and questions" but I am not aware of any such meeting taking place prior to yesterday. Only one day's notice was provided for a neighborhood meeting. While I appreciate yesterday's meetings as well as the quick responses from several District staff members to my initial questions, we still don't have all the information needed to understand the project details and adequately comment on the impacts to our neighborhood. Based on the information provided to date in the environmental document, the project has the potential to significantly affect the environment in the areas of land use, noise and lighting. Mitigation measures proposed are not adequately identified or addressed in the environmental document. The basic equipment will be running continuously in our quiet neighborhood. Confirmation is needed regarding the noise levels of this equipment during normal operation. One proposed mitigation measure directs noise towards the street, which will affect houses in the vicinity. The noise generated by monthly diesel testing and during power outages is not quantified nor is the impact addressed. A plan for monitoring compliance with noise limitations is not provided. I appreciate attempts to design a building that is not as stark as the booster station on Lake Tahoe Blvd., but I still find that the proposed building is sited too close to the street, and has many features of an industrial nature that don't fit in our residential neighborhood. 1 Even though some potential changes to the plan were discussed at the meeting yesterday, unless they are documented and become part of the official project plan, there is no way to hold the District accountable for them. I understand that you, as board members, have a large region and volume of projects and activities to oversee. However, I hope that you will still take adequate time to review and address public comments on this individual booster station project. There are many others who have similar concerns to mine, but most people are not able to take time off from work or their other responsibilities to come to a meeting that is held on a weekday afternoon. I would like to complement the District employees who were at the meetings yesterday because they were very polite and respectful towards us in listening to us and discussing our comments. I will be submitting more detailed comments in a letter but at this time I would like to submit a copy of my statement. Thank you. Lynne Paulson Email LCPaulson @comcast.net 2 STPUD Board Meeting April 21, 2011 Consent Calendar Item on Grizzly Mountain Waterline project Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. I was surprised to see that the Grizzly Mountain Water Line Replacement Project is listed on the Consent Calendar. I appreciate the District's efforts to improve the reliability of our water supply but I am wondering how you can approve the outlay of over a $1M for a project that serves the separately proposed Grizzly Mt. Booster Station project when the Booster Station project has not yet had public comment or been approved? This seems out of order to me. Even if it was not intended, the separation of the pipeline project from the Booster Station project has resulted in inadequate public understanding of the overall plan and its potential impact. Does it make sense financially to approve the piping project when there may need to be changes in the contract because it includes piping to connect to a Booster Station project that is under public review and TRPA review and which has not yet been approved? Shouldn't this item be removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed after the Booster Station project itself has been reviewed and approved? At the very least, the contract needs to be examined to make sure that the contractor will not take unfair financial advantage of the District if changes need to be made. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Lynne Paulson Email LCPaulson @comcast.net