Resolution No. 506 1
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
15
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
27
28
29
~0
31
RESOLIJT~ON NO, ~06
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
DENYING CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - MONTGOMERY
DEVELOPERS, A CO-PARTNERSHIP
~HEREAS, the SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
received a claim for damages from MONTGOMERY DEVELOPERS, a co-
partnership, on May /+, 196/+, a copy of which is attached hereto
marked "EXHIBIT A" and made a part hereof; and
~HE:.REAO, said claim for damages of said I~IONTGOMERY
DEVELOPERS, a co-partnership, was considered by the Board of
Directors at its regular meeting on May 7, !96~, and all matters
pertaining thereto;
NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors
.~of SOUTH TAHOE PUBLYC UTILITY DISTRICT as follows:
1. That the claim for damages o£ MONTGOMERY DEVELOPi~RS,
a co-partnership, received May ~, 1964, a copy o£ which is attache~
hereto, marked "EXHIBIT A" be, and the same is hereby rejected
in total.
2. That the attorney for said District be, and he is
hereby authorized to give notice o£ rejection to said MO~'~GTOME2Y
DEVELOPERS o
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of South Tahoe Public 'Utilit.~ District on May 7, 196~,
by the following vote:
AYES
Directors D~nald L. Clarke, Robert ~akeman,
Thomas Lo S~ewart, Robert ~'~. Fesler and
Donald H. Kortes
NOES: None
ABSENT: None 7 ,, ,
D6~'itd L. Clarke, President o£ the
Board o£ Directors o£ SOUTH TAHOE
~ ~ ~' ~ .....
A%Tn~. / 2~:-:~:~ PUBLI UiILIi% DISIRI t
'~~4~~V~~~A~E' J'~ : ' .... J"'? ;:: '~' PUBLIC
UTILII~Y D!ST~I6I a~d ex officio
o2 ~he Board oF Directors ~hereo$ "
(
1
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
15
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
24
25
26
27
28
29
50
31
,J~HN C. W£1DMAN
O:?'~rf"T~Tf~,"rP" "' ~'::; T z]' T,~ ."
~ OF CALiFOrNiA)
( SS.
CON~iTY OF EL DORAD6 )
Clerk of the
°¢'n';"~'
ou~.~ TA>tOE PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT, County o£ E1 Dorado, State of California, and
ax officio Secretary of th~ Board of Directors th=reo£, dc
her~h.y, certify t~',~+.,~ the attached ~Lesolutio~. i".o 5~'~ '
.... ~' iS a itu. e,
full. and correct copy tneroof, and that sa~.d resolution was
duly adopted by the Board of Directors ofo'~'r'~;,.~n m:'z:'OE~.,-~,. [zUDLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT at a regular meeti~:g duly held i. ~,l." 7, !76i~.., ~
the original oz samd resolutioz., is on fii~ ~_,_,~.~ bh~ o_~zzce
~uuin iAnt,~ zUo.L, Ib UTILII_~. DISTRICT a
. o IO resolubior:
was passed, and adopted by the following vote of the ?!_~;?bers of
the Board of Directors thereof:
Directors Donald L. u±arke~ i{otert Wakeman,
Thomas L. Stewart, z~oo=rb F~slcr ,;.nc
~{ortes
ABS~! T Y one
SOU'IN TAHOE ?~UBI_,±C U;£ILIT!~ .:
DIsTi~IO'r and ex officio /
Secretary of the Board of
DiPoc'bors th. oFec. f
CLAIM FOR D'"~^'~r'°
l'l~e undersJ?ned h.er,eby :')rez, ents the enci.--~,
above nar:ed .~overnmenTai a{rer~cv ~urs,.::~:,- ~:
the g.,vet,.mc,,r Code of 'the c-.+~ ~ Cali for,~ .....
. N,-',~ and address of c~air':anr:
disposals,
Col
app
Montzomerv/:Developers, a co-.~artner~.~.]-
4500 i:! c~mino'.Re.ai,, Los Alto~,~.ai.:c,:~ " ....
NoTices to:'be'sent ~o:
s Altos, and '>~ ~ - r~.
,ce. from
ii: A~ril off 1963
Dorado County
real pro?ertv i~;to
:;,.~b-;.::,vision is Located immediately adjg---'* ~ .
_eased bv the ut/l'i, ty district. Due to said s, cwage d~ , .-:.
oTeration and sewage seeoaee
the i{eaith De~artm'ent of E1 Dorado.'eounty,.refused to
clearance for the ap~roval of
claimant .~ad consented
?r°posed ~sub-division co
neces$~
was ob1:
additio~
o f ~nc'r~a
to .t hi.,
ta't,Iation , f u-. -, ,. i: .--_.:
pro,cee'dine ,v . :.
of Montgomery Estates at Lake ChrisTopher, Unit
_on~. as the matters complained of here.inabove con.tjn.~,~
exist, all to its further damage as set forth he:~c
Claimant aLle~es tha~ as ion~ as sai~'~ ~;ewa~,
system is so omerated by the ut]lirv district ~
condilions which have existed claimant will be una~ le ~-- sub-
divide its remainin~ proper~v~ consisting, of t?~e
iot area ordered stricken from its .... !visio:.
No. 2 and claimant will continue Lc, suffer da?..~
hereinafter on accoun~ thereof.
e. The name or names ot thc m~i~_c e~-,-.~v~
~he damage:
The names of emT, lovees are unknown 'v -_._
is asserted that all such per.son~ are emplove~s _~-
Tahoe Public Utility District.
f.. The amount of damages cza~mea:
Claimant asserts ~nat ~he
suffered and wi'Il continue to be suf.fered~bv claimant:
(1) Loss of ~ne saie a.~d :use of t'hir't::,~-..
lets~'in'~'Mont~omer~. ~ta~e~,ar Lake Ch.rF~';~c,~?.e
~':0. 1, from Appil,:'1963 unri'i s,~id lots,, c',J~: :;c
(estimated value of the, 'lots, $~: ,03( 2g ;~¢,r ' ·
per lot per y. ear.), which damaFe total.; 6.1u,O,,S .... ~c~:'{ .- ..... r.
(2) Loss o'f.-the,sale and u:;e of ei~lht ....
(3) Loss of use e' ~,ifteen
in Unit No. 2 from Apr~ nti, ,~aid '-
used ($280.00 pep lo~ per
sum of $~,~00.00 pep
(~) Ail costs of ?e-su~ v~on, re-.
legal fees necessary to re-subdivide Unit
accoun~ of thu delays crea%c~
unit by the 'mat"..,--~ ~et hePeina~ve, plus
No. 2, which amounts are
Time.
CARi{,McCLELLAN,IN~~iF~OLL,T!tC)!~i:'p~'f, ~, F,,
Bv
a co-partnership
~.oRlel~v