0042STATE OF,CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RIGHTS .BOARD
In the Matter of Application 19111 of
Sierra Nevada Water Company;
Applications 19509``and 19510 of .Fulton
Water Company; Application 19629 of
Meyers Water Company; Application
19819 of Mountain Springs Water Company;.
Application 1981+5 of Tahoe City Public
Utility District; and Application 20137
of Lawrence R. and Beryl S. Smith and .
Robert H. Williams to Appropriate. from
Lake Tahoe and Coyote Creek in El Dorado
and Placer Counties
}
Decision D 1152
DECISION APPROVING APPLICATIONS IN PART
The above-named applications are for permits to
appropriate unappropriated water from Lake Tahoe and Coyote Creek,
a tributary of Upper Truckee River. Protests having been re-
ceived with"respec,t to said applications, public hearings were
held in Sacramento, California, on February 28, 1962, and on
February 27, 1963. Board Member W. A. Alexander presided at both
hearings. The essential features of the applications are set
forth in Table 1. Application 19965 of Tahoe Paradise, Incor-
porated, also heard at .the same time, will be the subject of a
separate decision.
a)
s
O
¢, 0.1
1-4
rc
(t.;
t�
1
LC\ Cr)
0 t!: Cr) Ul 0 ff
•
U 0 0 • O1 N
0
x
• z,
v 1.
c > •/T' lZ
0 4-1i pF ' ri
4-t *
cti OrJ2 Cr)
.411 C.14
Pa C14*
00 !DO
1/1--12/31 D
1/1-12/31 D
W
r-1
Substance of the
0
5-1O
Applicant
0
Cd
O
cd
SW SE 32 16N 17E
SE SE 21 16N 17E
NW SW 25 12N 17E
CU
U) 1) CU
0
c o
cd
E-1 a)
0) v 0.
cti al 0
ti t•4 U
1/1-12/31 D
1/1.42/31 D
CV l0 Qr
4. 1/1 'r-1 cd
O tom- 0 FA
0
H
W W W .0
N— N lfl cd
H r-1 ri Q
•
l0 1.11
t-4 r-1 rl -P S::
C
. 1---1l0 CU 1~ cd
O f -t
z Qz� w •
En C! . CO P N O
4-1 rI
U3 1 4-)
O • $-tO
4) , v 4) vi 0 SA
0 .0 .0 .0 0 00))
cd cd td II tZ
H E-+ E-4 t
•r{ Cd 1
. 0 0) 0 EnCF-4
a a r1
r " U • S~ E
• O •r1 4-) 0 CO
O CO 0 r -i 0 rd •rI
Cr) 9r1 •0 -r-i C T.; r -i
Cti ;>a O '?a ' S--.` i=t S-1 CLi 4-) rI
cd cd r-1 S~" � a) Q cd CCI eri � �.. C • • ..1
> p4 0_ pi 4-' 4-3 Cti 'Ja •r-{ ci)
Z O PL:H O C/2 •i-1Pd.) •
Cisme < g C, = Ut ' s~ ". 0 i� f~'4-3
Si Si Si Sa cd 0 •rt CU r -i gi
Pi 0) cd 0) a) 0 Cd •ri O r—I S -c 'Ja (1)
0 '4-) .0 ,a 4-) ,?a C: d] F t ..C•' •ri S -t .a
•/2 cd o '' v �c/2 E D )-1 GAIZ
O1 0 0 0 0 0 r -I
\ \ vo - \ \ \ \ \
N-- O1 01 CO .ct- l0 CO
\ \ \ \ \ \
VD l0 ti 0 r-1 111
:--1 H
ri 01 N—
H 0 0H N r-{ -- CO
r1 LC1 U1 l0 00 02 r -t '
01 . al 01 01 01 0\ 0
I-1 H r{ H H r -i R
q .q
N�^ 'd H
1+1! C
• O g2e
a3 er-i
SivU
t72 •r1
cd
134.
¢t 1
•ri 4-) '
.C: v
co CU
O 0
O 0 H
4-) •ri 4-)
,0 CO
0
O 0
•ri 11 A
O • rQ 1
• 0 pi
The evidence and issues relative to water supply, vested
rights 'unappropriated water, interstate division of interstate
. waters, and conditions and limitations to be imposed in the public
interest are to a large extent identical with the evidence and
issues discussed by the Board in its Decision D 1056, adopted
February 15, 1962, of which the Board takes official notice. In
that decision the Board assumed to be surplus and unappropriated
the water from Lake Tahoe and the Truckee River stream system
"flowing by Derby Dam which isnot required to satisfy decreed
downstream Indian rights and which wastes into Pyramid Lake." An
analysis of studies of the Department of Water Resources indicated
the availability of unappropriated water.. The same conclusion is
indicated by the "Joint Report on the Use of Water in the Lake
Tahoe Watershed," prepared by the State Engineers of° Nevada and
California, and dated June 1949 (Staff Exh. 3). As was the`case
in Decision D'1056, careful consideration must be given to quanti-
tative diversion limitations expected to be imposed by the
California -Nevada Compact, covering allocation of water in the
Lake Tahoe Basin. Accordingly, individual applications will be
' o
considered ontheir wn merits and
c' �' then. with respect to maximum
monthly and annual limitations based on requirements. A staff
study (introduced by reference, page 4, transcript of February 27,
1963) indicates, and the Board firids, that it is reasonable to
limit requirements to a per capita use basis not in excess of 250
gallons per day. Because no long-term water development projects
are involved, and because of anticipated Compact diversion-.
limitations, maximum requirements will be based on the year 1970,
as was done in Decision D 1056.
Sierra Nevada Ginter Company Application 1911.x_ is for
a permit to appropriate 0.35 cubic foot per -second (cfs)., year-
round, from Lake Tahoe for domestic and' recreational purposes.
Applicant is a public utility corporation subject to the jurisdic-
tion of the California Public Utilities Commission. Its service
area, known as Dollar Points is on the northwest side of Lake Tahoe,
about 2.5 miles northeast of. Tahoe City. The gross area of the
development is about 185 acres contiguous to -Lake Tahoe, all of
which is to be subdivided into residential lots.. Recreational
use of water in a swimming pool is expected to require a flow of
-0.02 cfs for six months of the year. The balance of the 0.35 cfs
requested would be ' for domestic use. at is possible, that monthly
requirements for June through September may exceed this amount.
Application 21398 has been filed by the Company for an additional
supply. The Company's rrequirements .(within limits of Application
19111) are not in excess of 22 acre-feet in a maximum month, or
188 acre -:c Pet in _ any year.
1.John A. Fulton (dba Fulton Ginter Company) (hereinafter
called Fulton) Applications 18248*, 19509 and 19510.. request
appropriation from Lake Tahoe to serve an area located at the
*Application 18248 of John. A. Fulton was approved by •
Decision D 1056 and, after reconsideration, reinstated
by Order adopted on March 14, 1963.
northwest corner of Lake Tahoe, about 5 miles northeast of Tahoe
City. Applicant is a public utility under the jurisdiction of
the Public Utilities Commission. Application 18248 was approved
for year-round diversion, limited to a maximum diversion rate of
0.74 cfs and a total diversion of 280 acre-feet in any year.
Application 19510 requests year-round diversion at the
rate of 2 cfs for an area almost identical to the place of. use
presently authorized for Application,18248. Petitions are now
pending to authorize the identical place of use for both appli-
cations. If approved, the newly°authorized`. place of use would be
similar to that now authorized for Application 18248, except that
it would add a small excluded area.. As originally filed, each ap-
.plication.proposed a single point of diversion,.located about one
mile apart. Petitions are now'pending 'in ,connection :with..each
application to add the point of diversion requested in the other
application. It is'found that no legal user of water would be
prejudiced by the proposed! change of -place -of -use or , change of
points of diversions An order will be entered approving said
petitions.
The Board finds that the. total 1970 diversion require-
ments of the area to be served by Applications 18248 and 19510.
will be about 50.5 acre-feet in a maximum month.and'314 acre-feet
in any year. Said figures are inclusive of and not in addition to
comparable amounts already authorized.
Fulton's Application 19509 relates to aseparate water
system to serve a separate place of use located about one mile. to
the southwest of u1ton4s pI .ce of use previously described. It
is found that the 1970 diversion requirements for this area will be
about 12 acre-feet in a maximum month (equivalent to a continuous
• flow of 0.193 cfs) and 74 acre-feet in any year.
Fulton (and other applicants) will be expressly authorized
to have an instantaneous rate. of diversion in excess of that computed
.and authorized on a continuous flow basis, provided the maximum
month and annual LLmits are not exceeded. Such a provision should
permit Fultonto meet its daily peak requirements and comply with
reasonable requirements of the Public Utilities Commission without
exceeding monthly or annual limits.
leiers Water Company (hereinafter called Meyers
App licca tio;1 1 629 requests authority to appropriate 2.33 cfs, year-
round, and to Approp"rtiate 104'acre-feet by storage, between Octo-
ber 1 of each year and June 1 of the succeeding, ye,ar, from Coyote
Creek, a tributary of the Upper Truckee -Elver,. Meyers is, a wholly.-
owned subsidiary. of Tahoe Paradise, lne., •ars a ptu'b1ic utility
under the jurisdiction of the California .public Utilities Commission.
Meyers seeks by petition to.change 'the proposed place of
use under Application 19629 to an area of a little over,. 5,000 acres
identical with the place of use authorized by Decision D 1056 for
appropriation pursuant to its Applications 18021, 18030, 18031,
.18038 and 18039 A common distribution system is planned for the
entire area. It is found that the change would not operate to the
injury of any legal
user of water from the source involved, and
the' consolidated place , of 'use will be authorized..
Since the evidence of requir-ement> with respect to
subject application is for the most part identical with that
introduced by Meyers at the earlier hearing,.the.Board will regard
the maximum monthly and annual limits imposed by Decision D 1056
as still being applicable but will approve 'subject application for
the purpose of firming the supply and adding flexibility to the
system,
A stipulation with the Departnient of Fish .and ,Game for.
the release of water in Coyote Creek -for fish preservation. was
found reasonable by the:Board and approved in the earlier decision.
The, Board will again for the same --purpose require in the natural
channel of Coyote Creek below the proposed dam 'oa flow'of 0,25
cubic foot per second or the natural flow; whichever is less,"
(Emphasis added), Since the water to
appropriated under Ap-
_plication 19629 rises largely from -springs which will be -inundated
by the reservoir proposed under the filing, the°applicant requests
a preconstructio.n observation period of three years for postccnstr'uc .
tion use in calculating "natural flow." This request is found to .
be reasonable, and required comnencement'of construction will. -be
postponed to July 1, 19660
Duncan S. Davis dba_Mountain,S rin s Water Company)
Application 19812 requests appropriation, year-round, from Lake
Tahoe at the rate of 0.42 cubic foot per second for an area at
the north end of the lake known as Agate Bay Development Sites,
The applicant is' a public utility under the jurisdiction of the
Public Utilities Commission, and its present source of water is a
spring. Maximum development of the area to be served from Lake,
Tahoe is expected by 1968, at which time the -requirements for a
maximum month are computed as 26 acre-feet and, for beneficial use
of water for a full year, not to exceed 160 acre-feet, The wintertime
practice of "bleeding," or allowing water to run freely for the sole
purpose of preventing freezing of pipes, does not involve beneficial
use of. water. Quantities of water requested for "bleeding') have
been excluded. For purposes of this computation the Board adopted
the wintertime -summertime ratio of use of the nearby and comparable
Fulton system.
Tahoe Cit Public Utility District qplication 19845
seeks'appropriation, year-round, of 7.5 cfs from Lake Tahoe for
an anticipated service area of 1,000 acres located near the outlet
of Lake Tahoe to the Truckee River. The District now has a service
area of about half that size which is served with spring water and
some lake water. Utilizing the District's population projections
to 1970. anal the 250 gallons per capita, the .District's maximum
monthly 'requirements from all sources -are computed as 72 acre-feet
,and its annual requirements as . 4414 acre-feet. Accordingly, monthly
and annual limitations will include water from all sources. The
evidence does not justify adoption by the Board of the District's
daily per capita.requirement estimates.
Lawrence H. and Beryl S.. Smith and Robert H. Williams
plication 20137 requests appropriation of 0,16 cfs, year-round,
from Lake.Tahoe to serve an area of approximately 70 acres located
about 4 miles south of Tahoe City on the westerly side of State
Highway 89. Maximum month requirements for 1970 are found not to
exceed 9 acre-feet and the annual diversion not to exceed 50 acre-
feet. This application was originally filed in the name of "Kimberly. W.
Mosier., re resenting the Tahoe Mutual Water Company not formed at
I1212 1.." (Emphasis added). At the hearing on February 28, 1962,
Mr. Mosier testified that. it was definitely intended to incorporate
a mutual water company to'` serve the place of use (RT 155), and indi-
cated that shares would be.issued to the purchaser of each.lot
.(RT 151). The application indicates the subdivision is intended to
contain 140 lots, each of which would 'be dependent on the future
mutual water company for its water 'supply.. Establishment'o`f such
a water company .by the applicant would be consistent with the Board's
rule: 754 and 7560 and would simplify administration by the Boar. d.
.of appropr ative water rights to serve the 140 lot's. Accordingly,
it is found to be in the public interest to require the applicants
to form a mutual water company or arrange for some comparable agency
capable, of permanent service to the place of ' use .
The evidence indicates and. the Board finds that unappro-
priated water exists in the L"aice,Tahoe Basin, including all proposed
points of diversion, and that subject to ,suitable limitations and
conditions, such water may be diverted and used in the manner
proposed without causing substantial injury to any lawful user of
water. The intended use is beneficial.
From the'foregoing findings; the Board concludes that
Applications 19111, 19509, 19510, 19629, 19819, 19845, and 20137
should be approved in part, and that.permits should be issued to
the respective applicants for a total annual quantity not to,
exceed 3990 acre-feet including 3040 acre-feet under earlier
permits issued pursuant.to Decision D 1056 and subject to limi-
tations and conditions of general or specific ,applicability as
indicated.
ORDER
'IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applications 19111, 19509,
19510, 19629, 19819, 19845, and 20137 be, and they are, approved
in part,; subject to vested rights and 'to the ' liritatioris -and
conditions of special applicability asset forth in the following
Orders and to the limitations and conditions of general appltca-
bility, to be included in each permit as fellows
1. The maximum amount herein- stated may be reduced in
the license if investigation warrants,.
2. Progress reports shall -be filed promptly by permittee
-on forms which will be provided annually .by the_Sta.te Water Rights
Board until license is issued.
3. All rights and privileges under this permit, in-
cluding method of diversion, method of use, and quantity of water
diverted are subject to,the continuing authority of the State
Water Rights Board in accordance with law and in the interest of
the public welfare to prevent waste, unreasonable use, unreasonable
method of use, or unreasonable method of diversion of said water.
4. Permittee shall allow representatives of the State
Water Rights Board and Other parties, as may be authorized from
tirn.e to time by said Board, reasonable access to project works to
determine compliance with the terms of this permit.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. -The amount of water to be appropriated under the
permit issued pursuant to Application 19111 of Serra°Nevada
Water Company for. domestic and recreational purposes shall be
limited to the amount which can be beneficially used and shall
not exceed 035 cubic foot per second by direct diversion year-
.
round. The instantaneous rate -of diversion under the permit' may
exceed said rate, provided that, the amount of water appropriated
shall `not exceed 22 acre-feet in -any :month (equivalent to a
continuous flow of 0,35 cfs) e ' Total' appropriation underthis
permit shall not exceed 188 acre-feet in any 'ye'ar.
2, Actual construction work shall be completed on or
before De'c'ember. 1, 1969,
_
3'....Complete application ofthe. water to the proposed
. -use shall be made on or before December. 1, 19700
ORDER
Petitions having been filed .by John Aa Fulton . (dba Fulton
Water Company) to.._.change the points of diversion and place of use
described in his Applications 18248 and .19510 so that each appli-
cation will have the same two points of diversion and the same
place 'of use, as described in detail in said petitions, and it
being found that the proposed changes will not operate to the
injury of any lawful user of water, IT IS HERFRY ORDERED that said
four petitions be, and they are, approved; and IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED that:
1. The amount of water to be appropriated under the
permit issued pursuant to Application 19509 of John A. Fulton
(dba Fulton Water Company) for domestic and :municipal purposes
shall be limited to the amount which can be'beneTiciaily used
and shall not exceed 00193 cubic.foot per second by direct
diversion yearround. The instantaneous rate of diversion under
the permit may exceed said rate, provided that the amount of
water appropriated shall not exceed 12 acre-feet in any month'
(equivalent to a continuous flow of 0,193 cfs)e Total appro_%
priation under this permit shall not exceed 74 =acre•Afee t in any
year.
2: The amount of water to be appropriated under the
permit issued pursuant to Application 19510 of John A. Fulton
{dba Fulton Water Company) for domestic and muni cipal purposes
shall be, limited to the amount which can be -beneficially used and
. 'shall not. exceed 0.82 cubic foot per second' by direct diversion
year-round. The instantaneous rate of diversion under the permit
may exceed said rate, provided that the amount of water appropriated
undo;. this permit and under Application 18248 shall not exceed
5005 acre-feet in any month (equivalent to a continuous flow of
0.82 cfs). Total appropriation under this permit and under the
permit issued pursuant to Application 18248 shall.not exceed 314
acre-feet in any year.
3. Actual construction work shall begin on or before
Qiune 1, 1964, and shall thereafter be prosecuted with reasonable
diligence, and if not so commenced and prosecuted, this permit -
may be revoked.
4, Said construction work shall be completed on or
before December 1, 1969
5° -Complete-application of the water to the proposed.
use shall be made on -or before December 19 1970.
ORDER
• A petition having been filed to.change the place of"use
as described in Application 19629 of Meyers Water Company to be
.identical with the amended place of use as authorized (but misde-
scribed by clerical error) in Applications 18021, '1,8030, _18031,
18038, and 18039 of Meyers Water Company, and i -t being =found that
the proposed change of place of use would -not operate to the injury
of any lawful user of water;
IT ?:.S HEREBY ORDERED that said petition be, and it is,
approved and that the consolidated place of use for Applications
18021, 180309 18031, 18038, 18039, and 1962.9 of,, Meyers Water
Company be amended or. corrected to dea.cri:b:;e..,a _place of. .u.se .as
follows°
SW1 of Section l9; .. S1 of NEI of Section 21°
SES; of Section 21; W2 of SW-, and SW of NWS
of Section 22` W2 of NW* and 'NUJ of SW* of
Section 27°"N9 SWI.and N-2 of SE*- of Section
28(W , SE* and S2 of NE* of Section 29;` •
—
Section 30;`N2 and SE,i--, of Section 31 rand N2
of Section 32, all in T12N, R18E, .MDBFM; W2
of Section 5;, NE* and E2 of SE* of Section 6;
E2 of N*and E2 of SE* of Section 7; W2. of
Section 8; 129 W2 of NE and W2 .of SE* .of
Section 17; and NZ of NW and NW4 of_N- of
Section 20; all in TilN, R18E, P4DB&M; E7 of
NW1 of Section .25) NEu of Section 25r and the
NEE of Section 36, all in T12N, R1(E, MDBFcM.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
le. The amount of water to be appropriated under the
permit issued pursuant to Application 19629 .of :Meyers Water Company
for domestic purposes shall be limited to the amount which can be
beneficially used and shall not exceed 2033 cubic feet per second
by direct dj versi on to -be diverted year-round and ,102 acre-feet
per annum by storage to be collected from about October 1 of each
year toabout June 1 of the succeeding year. The instantaneous
rate of diversion under the permit may exceed 2,33 cfs, provided
that the amount of water appropriated by direct diversion shall not
><e
exceed 143 acre-feet in any month (equivalent to a continuous ow
of 2.33 cfs).
2`, Actual construction work shall begin on or before
July 1, 1966, and shall thereafter be prosecuted with reasonable
diligence, and if not so commenced and prosecuted, :this permitL
may: be revoked.
3. Said construction work shall be completed on or
before December 1, 1969.
Li, Complete application of the water to the proposed
use shall be made on or before December 1, 1970
,. The permittee 'shall release at all times into the
natural channel of Coyote Creek, immediately below Coyote Dam, a
flow of 0.25 cubic foot per second, or the natural flow, whichever
is less,.to.maintain fishlifee
6. Permittee shall install. and maintain an outlet pipe
of adequate capacity in his dam as near as practicable to the
bottom of the natural stream channel or provide. other means satis-
factory to the State Water Rights Board in order that water entering
the reservoir.or.collected in the reservoir during and after the
current storage season may be released into'the-downstreanrchannel
to the extent necessary to satisfy downstream prior rights and/or
to the extent that appropriation of said water is not authorized
under this permit,
7. Permittee shall install and maintain suitable
measuring devices (a) upstream from the high-water elevation of
his reservoir and (b) immediately below his -storage dam in order
that accurate measurement can be made of the quantity of water
flowing into and out of said reservoir.
8. In accordance with the requirements of Water Code
Section 1393, permittee shall clear the site of the proposed
reservoir of all structures, trees,
would interfere , with the use of the
and recreational -purposes.
9. A separate application for approval of
spec f3cationescribed for construction of the dam d
and other vegetation which
reservoir for water storage
plans and
in this
approved water right application shall be filed with and approved
by the Department of Water Resources prior to commencement of
construction of the dame
10. The total amount of water appropriated by direct
diversion under permits issued'pursuant to Applications 18021,
18030,.1803x, 18038, 18039, and 19629 shall not exceed 345 acre-
feet in any calendar month, and total diversions under said permits
shall not exceed 2,760 acre-feet in any year,
ORDER
IT IS HER1 BY ORDERED that:
10 The amount of water to be appropriated under the
permit issued pursuant. to Application 19819 of Duncan S. .Davis
(dba Mountain. Spring Water Company) for domestic purposes shall
be limited to the amount which can be beneficially used andshall
not exceed 0,42 cubic foot per second by direct diversion year-
round. The instantaneous rate of diversion under the permit may
exceed said rate, provided that the amount of water appropriated
shall not exceed 26 acre-feet in any month :(equivalent to a con-
tinuous flow of 0.42 cfs)o Total appropriation under this permit
shall not.exceed 160 acre-feet in any year•,'
2. Actual construction work shall begin on or before
•
June 1, 1964, and shall thereafter be proseeut.ed-twi:th reasonable
diligence, .and if riot so commenced and prosecuted,
:may be revoked.°
3, Said construction work shall be completed on or
before December 1, 1969
4. • Complete application of the water to the proposed
use shall be made on or before December 1, 1970°
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The amount of .water to be appropriated under the
peuiiit issued pursuant to Application 19845 of Tahoe City Public
Utility District fur municipal purposes shall be limited to. the
amount which can be beneficially used. and shall not exceed 1016
cubic feet per second by direct diversion year-roundt. The infi
stantaneous rate of diversion under the permit may exceed said
rate, provided that the amount of water appropriated shall not
exceed 72 acre-feet in any month (equivalent to a continuous_ flow
of 1.16 cfs). Total appropriation under this permit, when added
to all other water delivered by the permittee to its customers
within the place of use- authorized for 'Application 19845, shall
not exceed 72 acre --feet in any month or 4)44 acre-feet in any year.
2. < Actual construction work shall begin on or before
June 1, 1964, and shall thereafter be prosecuted with reasonable
diligence, and if not so commenced and prosecuted
this permit..
may be revoked.
3. Said construction work shall be completed on or
before Dec°6mber. 1, 1969.
4+. Complete application of the water to the proposed
use shall be made- on or before .December 1, 1970.
ORDS
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:.
1. The amount of water to be appropriated under the
permit issued pursuant to Application 20137 of Lawrence H. and
Beryl S. Smith and Robert H. Williams for domestic purposes
shall be limited to the amount which can be beneficially used
and shall not exceed 0.16 cubic foot per second by direct diver-
sion year-round. The instantaneous rate of diversion under the
permit may exceed said rate, provided that the amount of water
appropriated shall not exceed 9 acre-feet in any month (equivalent
to a continuous flow of 0.16 cfs)0 Total appropriation under this
permit shall not exceed 50.acre-feet in any year.
2. Actual construction work shall begin on or before
June 1, 1964, and shall thereafter be. prosecuted with reasonable
diligence, and if not so commenced and prosecuted, this permit.
may be revoked.
3 Said construction work shall be completed=on or
before December 1, 1969,
)4 Complete application of the. Meter to the proposed
use shall be _made on or ,before ' December 1, "970,
'5, No water shall be appropriated under this permit
_until the permittees have e tablished a mutualwater company or
some other organization capable, to the satisfaction_ of the State
.Water Rights Board, of supplying the place of use on a continuous
and permanent basis.
Adopted as the decision and order of the State Water
Rights Board a.t a.meeting duly calved -and held at Sacramento,
California, this 19th day of December y 1963°
- t -L -C
Kent'Silverthorne, Chairman .
L'se0'
Ralph J. hc9 li, Member
r'-7/7/7(2
A Aii
xan Memo