2500STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGE,.
•
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS
2125 19TH STREET
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95818
MAR 79 1976
Angora Water Company
P. O. Box 9026
South Lake Tahoe, CA 95705'
d 4
Application 23502
7G
3
In Reply Refer
to:321:RJB:23502
Filed May 7, 1970
In accordance with the Board's policy for administration
of water rights in the Lake Tahoe Basin, an annual fee
of $60.00 will be due May 7, 1976
Please give this matter your prompt attention.
Sincerely,
R. L. ROSENBERGER, Chief
Division of Water Rights
Attachment
RJBaines:bhalterman
•
'STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE 'RESOURCES AGENCY
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DwVfs!oN OF WATER RIGHTS
2125'19;THo'STREET •
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95818 p
APR 10 1975
Angora Water Company •
P. 0. Box 9026
South Lake Tahoe, CA 95705
Gentlemen:
rls N"� /5
9' 4 (
Application 23502 Fialed May 7, 1970
In accordance with the Board's policy for administration
of water rights In the Lake Tahoe,' Basin, an annual fee
of $60 will be due 30 days'` from •the date of this
letter.
Please give; this matter ° your prompt attention.
Sincerely,
R. L. ROSENBERGER, Chief
Division of Water Rights
Attachment
f
CARich:bhalterman
John L. ;.leder, C!r.+innan
William S. Brine'', Vice Chairman
Thomas Stewart
Lester 8.. Nagy
J. Allen Eray
Charles C. taunetev, Jr.
,."niter E. MacKenzie
i':: s,.morict L. Knisley
Norman 13. Livermore, Jr.
Elmo J. DeRicco
Jack W. Deinema
Richard R. Hanna
Legal Counsel
Richard M. Ileikka
Executive Officer
•
MIME REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY
•
Mr. Bill Dendy
State Water Resources Control Board
State of Cdifornia
Room 1015, Resources Building
1416 Ninth Street
Sacramento, California 95814
Dear Bill:
/' '/
P. O. I3o, 8g9r r,
South Lake Tahoe..
California 05705 %J/
r
8 February 1974
P. O. Uox 250
7..1nhvr Cove,
1!evada 394.48
•
We have deferred until now to answer the letter of December
5, 1973, wherein it. was suggestrd that the Tahoe Regional Planning
Agency become the lead'agency in the consideration of impact report
for the appropriation of water in the Tahoe basin.
We have reviewed this matter with legal staff and further have
taken the matter to the Agency Governing Board for consideration.
After reviewing all factors, the Agency Governing Board, on advise
of counsel, declined to accept responsibility requested,�the letter
from your office. The principal reason is that in the opinion of
counsel and staff, the agency is precluded from entering into the
question of the appropriation of waters from Lake Tahoe, as there
is specific compact language on the subject that clearly spells out /
that we infact cannot enter into the question of water appropriation.
This 'WAS done, we believe, because of the existence of. the
Bi -State Water Compact which has been operative for a numberof -
years. We will make available all data that has been prepared and
which is now substantial as to projected water needs within the,basin,
but without necessarily getting into the questbn of allocation. These
reports were recently completed as part of our continuing HUD program
and we believe provide the best and most accurate projections on
population by watershed that exist in the Tahoe basin.
If you have any questions regarding our position in this matter,
please feel free to call us at your convenience.
RN,1.I/jv
io52 'Ta.t;u. Lczile
Siffnr e,l y ,
RICHARD M. IIEIKKA
Executive Officer
Sou 1:11 Lake Tahoe C'alifo rn1.a
A1.6 54 2-02.9 5
:l„„/