Loading...
1344May 14, 1963 Meyers Water Company cAdolph _Moskovitz Attorney at Law 520 Capitol Mall . ' Sacramento 14, California Subject: Applications 18021, 18030, 18031,. 18038, 18039 and 19629 Gentlemen: Your petition to change the -place of use under Application 19629 has been reviewed by this office. - - At the hearing held on February 27, 1963, it was stated that the purpose of the change was to make the place of use under Application 19629 identical,to that under the other fiveā€¢appli- cations listed above, as a common distribution system was planned for the entire area. The following areas are covered by your petition on Application 19629 but are not within the authorized place of use under permits issued on Applications 18021,, 18030, 18031, 18038 and 18039: S of NEi and the SE- of Section 21, T12N, R18E, MDBRcM;', E of Nib* and the NE* .of. Sec tion 25,. T12N, 1117E,0 MDB&M. NE,. of Section -36, T12N, R17E, MDB&M. The .following areas are within the authorized place of use under the permits issued on Applications 18021, 18030,. 18031, 18038 and 18039 but are not within the area covered by the petition: Si of NE4 and the SE of Section 20, T12N, *18E, MEM SE* of Section ' 25, 712N, R17E, MDB&L ,SE .of Section 36, T12N, R17E, MDEM. Meyers Water Company May 14, 1963 Page 2 Before giving further consideration to your petition on Application 19629 we would appreciate your re-examining the area which Meyers Water Company intends to serve under the six applications, especially with respect to the areas described above. If'the area described by the petition on Application 19629 represents -the area presently intended to be served, petitions should be submitted to conform the place of use under the permits on the other five applications.. Very truly yours, L. K. -Hill Executive Officer' SLA:KLW:ia:st