Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
20220505 District Board Agenda Packet May 5, 2022
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA Thursday, May 5, 2022 - 2:00 p.m. District Board Room 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, California David Peterson, Vice President BOARD MEMBERS Kelly Sheehan, President Chris Cefalu, Director Shane Romsos, Director Nick Exline, Director John Thiel, General Manager Paul Hughes, Chief Financial Officer 1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (At this time, please silence phones and other electronic devices so as not to disrupt the business of the meeting.) 2. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board on any short non-agenda items that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the District. No discussion or action can be taken on matters not listed on the agenda, per the Brown Act. Each member of the public who wishes to comment shall be allotted five minutes, and no more than three individuals shall address the same subject.) 3. CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR (For purposes of the Brown Act, all Action and Consent items listed give a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed. Recommendations of the staff, as shown, do not prevent the Board from taking other action.) 4. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR (Any item can be removed to be discussed and considered separately upon request. Comments and questions from members of the public, staff or Board can be taken when the comment does not necessitate separate action.) 5. CONSENT ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION/ACTION 6. ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION a. Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project (Adrian Combes, Senior Engineer) 1) Approve the proposed Scope of Work from Water Systems Consulting, Inc., to provide engineering services for the Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project; and, 2) Authorize the General Manager to execute Task Order No. 2 in the amount $116,411. b. Setting Water and Sewer Capacity Charges (Paul Hughes, Chief Financial Officer) Adopt Ordinance No. 581-22, an Ordinance of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, Setting Water Capacity Charges and Sewer Connection Fees and Amending Administrative Code Sections 3.1.49(a), 3.1.49(c), 3.1.49(e), 4.5.7 and Associated Appendix Fee Schedules. c. Approve Payment of Claims (Debbie Henderson, Accounting Manager) Approve Payment of Claims in the amount of $2,267,169.47. REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA – May 5, 2022 PAGE – 2 7. STANDING AND AD-HOC COMMITTEES AND LIAISON REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) 8. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) 9. EL DORADO WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR REPORT 10. STAFF/ATTORNEY REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken.) 11. GENERAL MANAGER REPORT (Discussion may take place; however, no action will be taken.) a. Staffing Update b. Lake Valley Fire c. Payment of Claims Process Alternatives 12. NOTICE OF PAST AND FUTURE MEETINGS/EVENTS Past Meetings/Events 04/21/2022 – 2:00 p.m. Regular Board Meeting at the District Future Meetings/Events 05/10/2022 – 3:30 p.m. System Efficiency and Sustainability Committee 05/11/2022 – 10:00 a.m. El Dorado Water Agency Meeting in Placerville 05/16/2022 – 3:30 p.m. Operations Committee Meeting at the District 05/19/2022 – 2:00 p.m. Regular Board Meeting at the District ADJOURNMENT (The next Regular Board Meeting is Thursday, May 19, 2022, at 2:00 p.m.) The South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month. A complete Agenda packet is available for review at the meeting and at the District office during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A recording of the meeting is retained for 30 days after Minutes of the meeting have been approved. Items on the Agenda are numbered for identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the order in which they appear. Designated times are for particular items only. Public Hearings will not be called to order prior to the time specified, but may occur slightly later than the specified time. Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the Agenda will be taken at the same time the Agenda items are heard; comments should be brief and directed to the specifics of the item being considered. Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all written materials presented at the meeting. Comments on items not on the Agenda can be heard during “Comments from the Audience;” however, action cannot be taken on items not on the Agenda. Backup materials relating to an open session item on this Agenda, which are not included with the Board packet, will be made available for public inspection at the same time they are distributed or made available to the Board, and can be viewed at the District office, at the Board meeting and upon request to the Clerk of the Board. The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate participation of the disabled in all of the District’s public meetings. If particular accommodations are needed, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (530) 544-6474, extension 6203. All inquiries must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA – May 5, 2022 PAGE – 3 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT CONSENT CALENDAR Thursday, May 5, 2022 ITEMS FOR CONSENT a. SECONDARY CLARIFIER NO. 3 REHABILITATION PROJECT (Stephen Caswell, Principal Engineer) Approve Change Order No. 2 to TNT Industrial Contractors, Inc., in the amount of <$52,120.14>. b. 2022 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF FIRE HYDRANTS, VALVES AND ASSEMBLIES (Chris Stanley, Field Operations Manager and Heidi Baugh, Purchasing Agent) Award a Contract for the purchase of 37 fire hydrant assemblies and valves to lowest responsive, responsible bidder, American AVK Company, in the amount of $103,665.61. c. VIRTUAL BOARD MEETINGS RELATED TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 DUE TO COVID-19 STATE OF EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION (John Thiel, General Manager) Approve Resolution No. 3218-22 allowing for South Tahoe Public Utility District to conduct virtual public meetings for 30 days. d. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE (Chris Skelly, Information Technology Manager) Authorize staff to enter into a Contract with Government Technology Group, LLC, for professional services to develop an updated Information Technology Strategic Plan and to complete a Network Vulnerability Assessment for a cost not to exceed $78,340. BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4a TO: Board of Directors FROM: Stephen Caswell, Principal Engineer MEETING DATE: May 5, 2022 ITEM – PROJECT NAME: Secondary Clarifier No. 3 Rehabilitation Project REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 2 to TNT Industrial Contractors, Inc., in the amount of <$52,120.14> DISCUSSION: Change Order No. 2 addresses: A. Four items to address additional work needed to construct the Secondary Clarifier No. 3 Rehabilitation Project (Project) B. One work item to reflect changes necessary to deal with impacts from the Caldor Fire delay C. Three balancing items to address the difference in the assumed quantities included in the Contract and the actual quantities of work performed. A. The four items to address additional work to construct the Project include the following: 1. During construction it was discovered that the clarifier underdrain system needed repair. This required more materials than were required in the original bid. 2. The connection of the new RAS pipe to the existing RAS pipe required a reducing coupling in lieu of a standard coupling. This requirement was not known prior to excavating the pipe. 3. The clarifier had originally been modified which buried a portion of the exterior wall. The seismic retrofit of the clarifier required the buried portion to be exposed. Upon exposing the wall, it was determined that repair of the concrete was needed. 4. During construction it was determined that increasing the thickness of the concrete in the clarifier launder from 6 inches to 12 inches provided more protection to the low-density concrete fill provided as part of the seismic retrofit. Increasing the amount of material increased the cost of this portion of the work. General Manager John Thiel Directors Chris Cefalu Shane Romsos David Peterson Kelly Sheehan Nick Exline 1 Stephen Caswell Page 2 May 5, 2022 Items 1-4 above resulted in an increase in the Contract amount by $23,911.75 and are items A, B, C, and E on the attached Change Order. B. Because of the Caldor Fire, work on the Project did not occur for approximately one month. This pause pushed some of the work into colder times of year than was originally planned and additional protections and precautions were required to allow work to proceed. In particular, the grouting of the clarifier slab required the contractor to provide methods to keep the temperature of the grout above 55 degrees initially and to not allow any freezing to occur during the grout curing period. The equipment, materials, and labor to do this were not part of the original Contract and resulted in an increase in the Contract amount by $27,746.11 and is item D in the attached Change Order. C. The three balancing items include the following: 1. During construction the amount of concrete crack repair needed was higher than estimated in the bid documents. The Contract allowed for 100 square feet, but 262 square feet were required to address all of the cracks in the Clarifier wall. This additional work resulted in an additional cost of $21,222 to the District. 2. The Contract has an allowance for as-needed work on the District’s sewer system. This line item is to be used for work outside of the original scope of the Contract and can be used on any emergency or high priority work that was unknown at the time of bid. This allowance was not used on this project and results in a credit of $100,000 to the District. 3. The Contract has an allowance for unknown underground conditions. This line item is to be used to address any conditions that are discovered during construction from unknown underground utilities. This allowance was not used on this project and results in a credit of $25,000 to the District. Items 1-3 above resulted in a decrease in the Contract amount by $103,778 and are items F, G, and H on the attached Change Order. SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: <$52,120.14> ACCOUNT NO: 1030-7003 (SC3RHB) BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE: ATTACHMENTS: Change Order No. 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO 2 1 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 02 Project: WWTP Secondary Clarifier No. 3 Rehabilitation Project Contractor: TNT Industrial Contractors, Inc. Date: 5/5/2022 PO #: 21-140 The Contract Shall Be Changed As Follows: A) Amend Bid Item 2 to reflect a $2,067.02 increase in the bid price for additional underdrain materials. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM A IS $2,067.02 TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IS A + B + C + D + E + F + G +H = <$52,120.14> Dollar Amounts Contract Time Original Contract $2,074,822.00 480 Calendar Days Previous Change Order <$3,594.96> 0 Calendar Days Current Contract $2,074,822.00 480 Calendar Days THIS CHANGE ORDER <$52,120.14> 0 Calendar Days New Contract Total $2,019,106.90 480 Calendar Days Contractor agrees to make the herein-described changes in accordance with the terms hereof. The change in contract price and/or contract time noted is full settlement for costs incurred because of the change(s) described, unless specifically noted in individual description(s). Date: ____________ Authorized By STPUD Board President Date: _____________ Accepted By Contractor Date: _____________ Reviewed By 3 2 B) Amend Bid Item 2 to reflect a $1,886.46 increase in the bid price for supplying a reducing coupling for the RAS pipe connection in lieu of a standard coupling. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM B IS $1,886.46 C) Amend Bid Item 10 to reflect a $11,373.59 increase in the bid price for providing additional concrete repair to the Clarifier wall that was discovered after removal of the sand fill as described in Design Clarification 5. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM C IS $11,373.59 D) Amend Bid Item 2 to reflect a $27,746.11 increase in the bid price for additional requirements necessary to pour grout in cold weather conditions as outlined in Design Clarification 8. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM D IS $27,746.11 E) Amend Bid Item 2 to reflect a $8,584.68 increase in the bid price for additional concrete for the clarifier launder as outined in Design Clarification 7. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM E IS $8,584.68 F) Amend Bid Item 9 to reflect an increase in the quantity of an additional 162 square feet of concrete crack repair. At the unit cost of $131.00/sf, this results in an increase in the bid price or $21,222.00. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM F IS $21,222.00 G) Amend Bid Item 7 to reflect a <$100,000.00> decrease in the bid price to reflect that this allowance was not used as part of the project. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM G IS <$100,000.00> H) Amend Bid Item 8 to reflect a <$25,000.00> decrease in the bid price to reflect that this allowance was not used as part of the project. There is no change to the Contract Time related to this change in work. TOTAL FOR ITEM H IS <$25,000.00> TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 IS A + B + C + D + E + F + G +H = <$52,120.14> 4 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4b TO: Board of Directors FROM: Chris Stanley, Field Operations Manager Heidi Baugh, Purchasing Agent MEETING DATE: May 5, 2022 ITEM – PROJECT NAME: 2022 Purchase and Installation of Fire Hydrants, Valves and Assemblies REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Award a Contract for the purchase of 37 fire hydrant assemblies and valves to lowest responsive, responsible bidder, American AVK Company, in the amount of $103,665.61. DISCUSSION: The District has been awarded up to $300,000 from the City of South Lake Tahoe American Rescue Plan Act to purchase and install fire hydrants on waterlines within the city limits of our service area. To fulfill the competitively solicited requirement of this funding source, staff advertised publicly and solicited bids for the procurement of 37 fire hydrant assemblies and valves on April 8, 2022. Only one bid was received and opened on April 26, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The bid has been reviewed by staff and showed no deviations. Staff recommends that the Board award a Contract with American AVK Company, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $103,665.61. SCHEDULE: Upon Board approval COSTS: $103,665.61 ACCOUNT NO: 20.24.8303 BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE: City funding though the American Rescue Plan Act ATTACHMENTS: Bid Item Summary Spreadsheet ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: Sewer/Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO General Manager John Thiel Directors Chris Cefalu Shane Romsos David Peterson Kelly Sheehan Nick Exline 5 Issued: 04/07/2022 Bid Close: 04/26/2022 10:00 AM (PDT) Item#Description UM Qnty Unit Price Extended Price 1 4' (four foot) bury fire hydrant assembly EA 18 $2,108.64 $37,955.52 2 5' (five foot) bury fire hydrant assembly EA 19 $2,206.56 $41,924.64 3 Gate valves, 6" nominal size, (MJ x FL), Class 150 EA 37 $642.85 $23,785.45 Total $103,665.61 American AVK Company South Tahoe Public Utility District Bid Results: 2022 Purchase of Fire Hydrant Assemblies and Valves 6 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4c TO: Board of Directors FROM: John Thiel, General Manager MEETING DATE: May 5, 2022 ITEM – PROJECT NAME: Virtual Board Meetings related to Assembly Bill 361 due to COVID-19 State of Emergency Proclamation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Resolution No. 3218-22 allowing for South Tahoe Public Utility District to conduct virtual public meetings for 30 days. DISCUSSION: The California Governor's Emergency Executive Order allowing for virtual public meetings expired on September 30, 2021. As a result, Assembly Bill 361 passed September l 0, 2021, signed into law September 26, and set to expire on December 31, 2023, allowing some variation of virtual meetings to continue. Local agencies are allowed to continue conducting meetings virtually so long as the Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency and the Bill imposes new requirements for authorizing and holding such virtual meetings. One such requirement is that the Board would be required to determine that in person meetings were not in the best interest of health and safety of the Board and public and that decision would need to be put on the Agenda and voted on every 30 days. SCHEDULE: Upon Board approval COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 3218-22 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: General GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO General Manager John Thiel Directors Chris Cefalu Shane Romsos David Peterson Kelly Sheehan Nick Exline 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 RESOLUTION NO. 3218-22 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT MAKING FINDINGS AND DECLARING ITS INTENT TO CONTINUE REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DUE TO THE THREAT OF COVID-19 WHEREAS, the South Tahoe Public Utility District (“District”) is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the Board of Directors (“Board”); and WHEREAS, all meetings of the Board are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and observe the Board conduct its business; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 54953(e) makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and WHEREAS, a required condition for remote telephone conference meetings is that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and WHEREAS, a proclamation is made when there is an actual incident, threat of disaster, or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the State; and WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the State, specifically, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a State of Emergency on March 4, 2020, related to the threat of COVID19, which remains in effect; and WHEREAS, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (“Cal/OSHA”) regulations at Title 8 Section 3205 recommends physical distancing in the workplace as precautions against the spread of COVID-19 and imposes certain 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Resolution No. 3218-22 Page 2 May 5, 2022 restrictions and requirements due to a “close contact” which occurs when individuals are within six feet of another in certain circumstances; and WHEREAS, California Department of Public Health and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention caution that the Delta variant and the Omicron variant of COVID- 19 are more transmissible than prior variants of the virus and that even fully vaccinated individuals can spread the virus to others resulting in rapid and alarming rates of COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations; and WHEREAS, the COVID-19 virus continues to pose imminent risk to health and safety and directly impacts the ability of the public and the Board to meet safely in person, accordingly, the Board hereby recognizes the proclamation of state of emergency by the Governor of the State of California and the regulations of Cal/OSHA recommending physical distancing; and WHEREAS, as a consequence of the emergency related to COVID-19, to allow for physical distancing and remote meeting attendance, the Board intends to continue to invoke the provisions of AB 361 as provided in Government Code section 54953, subd. (e) and such meetings of the District shall comply with the requirements to provide the Board members and the public with access to the meetings as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of section 54953; and WHEREAS, the Board meetings will be accessible to the public to attend electronically or via phone. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors does hereby find and resolve as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. 2. The meetings of the Board may be held with teleconference rules pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (e) of Government Code section 54953 due to the impacts of COVID-19, the Governor’s state of emergency proclamation, state and local recommendations and the importance of physical distancing to minimize any potential adverse health and safety risks. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Resolution No. 3218-22 Page 3 May 5, 2022 3. The Board hereby considers the current conditions of the state of emergency and the state and local recommendations and regulations related to social distancing and reauthorizes remote teleconference meetings. 4. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings of the Board in accordance with subdivision (e) of Government Code section 54953 and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act for remote only teleconference meetings. 5. Staff is further directed to continue to monitor the conditions and health and safety conditions related to COVID-19, the status of the Governor’s state of emergency, the local orders related to physical distancing, and the state regulations related to social distancing, and present to the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting the related information and recommendations for remote only meetings pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 54953(e)(3) and to extend the time during which the Board may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 3218-22 was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of May, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: _____________________________________ Kelly Sheehan, Board President South Tahoe Public Utility District ATTEST: _________________________________ Melonie Guttry, Clerk of the Board South Tahoe Public Utility District 10 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4d TO: Board of Directors FROM: Chris Skelly, Information Technology Manager MEETING DATE: May 5, 2022 ITEM – PROJECT NAME: Information Technology Strategic Plan Update REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize staff to enter into a Contract with Government Technology Group, LLC, for professional services to develop an updated Information Technology Strategic Plan and to complete a Network Vulnerability Assessment for a cost not to exceed $78,340. DISCUSSION: An Information Technology (IT) Strategic Plan (Plan) is develped to help IT departments and organizations best utilize their current technology resource investments. The Plan identifies improvements for future implementation and provide guidelines for setting priorities. The Plan is broken up into sections that cover costs, staffing, timelines, security, functionality, backup, and disaster recovery. Specific recommendations are also provided to assist the District and the District’s IT Department with maintaining a “Best Practices” service delivery for each of the areas. Staff received three responses to the Request for Proposal. Costs ranged from $78,000 to $94,720. After receiving the responses, IT staff reviewed the Proposals against criteria such as completeness, relevance of references, stated project methodology, and communication skills. After all reviews were complete, staff averaged the scores for each category and Government Technology Group, LLC, (GTG) had the best average score across all graded metrics demonstrating the best Proposal and value to the District. The District’s Plan was last updated by NextLevel Information Technology in 2014. The Plan has served the District well and stayed relevant for roughly five years. IT evolves rapidly and these plans have a good record of preparing the District’s infrastructure to be able to support emerging technologies. The Plan will help ensure that the District’s investment in technology resources is maximized, secure, and safe. GTG has a proven track record of helping other water and wastewater organizations around the state. With their assistance, the IT Department and the District, will be positioned to support the business goals of the District and its customers for the next several years. General Manager John Thiel Directors Chris Cefalu Shane Romsos David Peterson Kelly Sheehan Nick Exline 11 Chris Skelly Page 2 May 5, 2022 SCHEDULE: Project estimate six Months COSTS: Not to exceed: $78,340 ACCOUNT NO: Various BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE: $84,000 ATTACHMENTS: Government Technology Group, LLC Proposal ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: Sewer/Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO 12 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022. All rights reserved. Proposal for Information Technology Strategic Plan Refresh to South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Dr. South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 From 2930 Geer Rd Suite 273 Turlock, CA 95382 (209) 678-3077 projects@GovTechGroup.net 13 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022. All rights reserved. Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 6 Firm Qualifications ............................................................................................................................ 9 Project Team Qualifications ............................................................................................................ 11 Project Approach ............................................................................................................................ 14 Project Time Schedule .................................................................................................................... 24 Proof of Insurance ........................................................................................................................... 26 Exhibit A – Scope of Work .............................................................................................................. 27 Exhibit B – Project Costs and Standard Fee Schedule .................................................................... 30 Exhibit C – Security Assessment Scope.......................................................................................... 33 Exhibit D - Additions and Exceptions ............................................................................................... 43 Exhibit E - Project References ........................................................................................................ 44 Exhibit F - Resumes ........................................................................................................................ 46 Exhibit G - Backup, Restore, Disaster Recovery (BRDR) ............................................................... 52 14 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022. All rights reserved. Letter of Transmittal 15 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022. All rights reserved. March 23, 2022 Chris Skelly, Information Technology Manager South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Dr. South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Subject: Information Technology Strategic Plan Proposal by Government Technology Group, LLC Dear Mr. Skelly, Government Technology Group, LLC (GTG) respectfully submits this proposal of work to South Tahoe Public Utility District to complete an Information Technology Strategic Plan Refresh that will guide district technology for the next 5 years. GTG is a technology consulting firm comprised of public service information technology leaders. We have extensive experience in local government with practical, hands-on, real-life expertise delivering traditional business applications and network infrastructure technologies. We have developed and implemented technology plans for Dublin San Ramon Services District; the cities of Victorville, Concord, Danville, Hayward, Sunnyvale, Ventura, Chico, Vacaville, Santa Barbara; the housing authorities of Alameda and San Mateo; and Riverside County. We will deliver the same for the South Tahoe Public Utility District. In addition, GTG has partnered with Spirent for their security expertise in technology-based penetration and vulnerability testing/reporting. Spirent’s experience includes substantial work for agencies world-wide including the following government agencies City of San Jose, City of Mission Viejo and City of Rockville, MD. Spirent will provide support for security testing as outlined in exhibit C. We are confident that, based on the Request for Proposal (RFP), Government Technology Group meets or exceed the conditions asked for in the selection criteria. In this Covid-19 era, most of the consulting and engineering work will be primarily performed virtually using Zoom. If, as is being projected, the pandemic recedes by mid-year then on-site work can be reevaluated. Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to discussing the proposed projects further with you. Sincerely, Jeff Lewis Jeff Lewis, PMP, CGEIT Principal Consultant Jeff@GovTechGroup.net 16 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 5 Executive Summary 17 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 6 Executive Summary Technology plays a vital role in helping the South Tahoe Public Utility District (STUPD) improve service delivery and streamline district operations to achieve cost efficiencies and increased productivity. Technology enables innovation in business and operational processes and users are demanding new technology to simplify or speed their work. The extensive integration of technology into the District’s operations and services and its great potential to deliver benefit requires the District to make careful decisions about when, where, and how to use it. Business and operational strategies and the resource management of personnel, assets, and services drive informational requirements and strategies. Only then can the organization move from data, to insight, to action, to outcome using technology to deliver actionable information to power business and operational decisions. Government Technology Group LLC (GTG), a consulting group of former, local government CIO’s and IT leaders, with the support of our sub-contractor Spirent, a security expert with extensive penetration and vulnerability testing, will provide STUPD an Information Technology Strategic Plan that will ensure STUPD’s ability to effectively use technology to support, optimize, enhance, and extend its operations and business processes while protecting it from security threats. We do this through a structured, phased approach that builds on the earlier stages and findings to discover and resolve foundational gaps in technology and organization, recommend road maps and prioritizations, and enlighten and energize workforce support for a coherent and integrated district-wide technology portfolio. Each subject discipline is addressed through technical research that become part of the greater Information Technology Strategic Plan as outlined in our Statement of Work. The information reviewed in our analysis is a collaborative effort with District staff through conversations, surveys, meetings, workshops, and reviews, supplemented by subject matter expertise and awareness of industry best practices and evolving trends. Extensive communication is key, and our project initiation process ensures that joint expectations are fully understood and met throughout the project with regular meetings and reporting. Our schedule, a work plan of twenty to twenty-two weeks (Strategic plan and Disaster recovery at same time vs contiguous), is exemplary of how each project phase is memorialized in a milestone and it is flexible to meet District staffing and operational requirements. Background preparatory activities for each milestone will be continuous throughout the project to meet the stated objectives and deliverables. As technology leaders in our recent organizations and now in consulting, GTG provides significant, hands-on project experience delivering technology advancement in cities, agencies, and districts, working with public funds while answering to City Councils and District Boards of Directors. Like you, we have continually held the responsibility to design, plan and implement complex network and software projects. We get it done! Recent projects include network upgrades, cybersecurity, telephony, ERP implementations, enterprise content document management systems, websites, SCADA networks and security, CMMS asset management systems, cloud office systems, among others. We have been successful through partnering with the user communities to accomplishing these upgrades, conversions, and replacements without interruption to the critical work of the organizations. Spirent has a long history of successful security analysis, design, development, and resolution of for high level corporations. The combined strength of these two firms meets all the required qualifications with a history of accomplishment delivering technology-based strategic plans and security assessments for local government agencies to take advantage and protect itself with new technologies. Our two firms are prepared to assist with the District’s Technology Plan that will position the agency to embrace these advancements. 18 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 7 STUPD’s Information Technology Strategic Plan will become a framework for the next 5 years that will facilitate the alignment of technology to the strategic intent of the District operations and allow the District to target investments and develop capabilities that contribute to achieving strategic and organizational objectives while protecting its assets and reputation. The resulting governance structure will provide a process discipline to ensure that new projects and opportunities are thoroughly vetted. The Plan will guide and enable decisions on how technologies support operational and business processes and help staff collaborate within and across divisional boundaries. A portfolio of systems perspective on systems integration will guarantee that enterprise business rules are consistently applied, that the integrity of data is not compromised, interfaces and information flows are standardized, and that connectivity, security and interoperability requirements are managed. It will lay out steps towards technology convergence, striving towards a standard, supportable technology portfolio for the District. If STUPD proceeds with the Disaster Recovery Plan refresh, the Government Technology Group will complete the project in conjunction with the Strategic Plan refresh or serially as desired by the agency and staff resource availability. 19 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 8 Firm Qualifications 20 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 9 Firm Qualifications Government Technology Group LLC (GTG), formed in 2019 (combining Priest Consulting with the Government Technology Group representing 10 years of Consulting Services), represents over 100 years of professional technology experience by its principals. After 20 plus years of joint inter-agency cooperation, consulting and personal collaboration with each other and their respective agencies’ technologies, a group of former Bay Area CIO's expanded a technology consulting firm that specializes in government technology challenges. We have assisted a number of clients with IT assessments, strategic planning, and master plans which includes Victorville, Santa Barbara, Hayward, Vacaville, DSRSD, Housing Authority of Sant Clara County, Housing Authority of Alameda, and the Greater Vallejo Recreation District to name a few. This includes Water/Wastewater/Recycled Water Special District and municipalities with water/wastewater facilities. Our expertise includes planning and implementation of complex, major software installations and operations in the following areas, where we have provided problems that impact organizations such as STUPD: Network Infrastructure Enterprise Network Architecture Network Operations & Engineering SCADA WAN & IP Network Engineering Availability & Capacity Management Contingency Planning/ Business Resumption Security Administration – Zero Trust Firewall/VPN/IDP/AntiVirus/ AntiSpyware/AntiMalware/Web Filtering Internet Service Provision Telephony - Voice - Telephones - Cell Phones - Call Center - Presence – Messaging System Administration Windows System Administration File and Print Services Microsoft Office 365 Local & Cloud Directory Services Administration Server Configuration Management Storage Area Network Administration ECMS (Enterprise Content Management) System Administration Application & Storage Virtualization Exchange Messaging Operations Backup Operations Desktop and Mobile Hardware & Software Software Licensing Application Administration Application Support and Administration Application Change/Release Management Application Integration Application Configuration Reporting Programming eO&M Automated Meter Infrastructure Secure Utility Billing and Permitting Customer Internet Portals Help Desk Management Management Information Systems Data Warehousing Business Intelligence Management Dashboard Cloud Technical Workforce Management Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) SQL Database Operations & Administration Software Training Internet Websites SharePoint CMMS Asset Management 21 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 10 Spirent Security Labs has more than 1,700 customers across Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, and North America. Spirent’s team of experts are dedicated to providing penetration testing, managed vulnerability scanning services, and security best practices training. Our team has experience working with numerous global institutions providing scanning and penetration services 22 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 11 Project Team Qualifications 23 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 12 Project Team Qualifications Government Technology Group GTG will assign Mr. Jeff Lewis as the primary consultant, and Mr. Guenther and Mr. Priest as subject matter experts (SME)/Senior consultants to the project. GTG will also be partnering with Spirent Security Labs for this project to enhance our expertise in penetration testing, managed vulnerability scanning services, and security best practices. Jeff Lewis, MPA, PMP, CGEIT – Project Manager Jeff Lewis is a veteran in the field of Information Technology and has a career that spans over thirty-eight years in public, private, and non-profit sectors including positions in local government, medical, and technology consulting. He has served as Chief Information Officer for multiple local government and non-profit agencies, is a founding member of the Government Technology Group (www.GovTechGroup.net) and has served as the Director of Smart Region Initiative at Joint Venture Silicon Valley. As a CIO Jeff has led Smart City, broadband, technology strategic and GIS planning, enterprise architecture, policy, and research initiatives for local government. Mr. Mark Guenther, CGCIO - Systems and Programming Expert Mr. Guenther is a retired municipal Chief Information Officer with a wide range of hands-on technical expertise. In both the CIO and consulting roles, he has overseen the successful implementation of citywide enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, permitting systems and utility billing functions, including secure online customers access to permit and utility accounts. Mr. Clancy Priest, IEEE – Network and Systems Expert Mr. Priest is a retired 30+ year municipal Chief Information Officer who has been part of several organizations. Mr. Priest is currently an independent technology consultant offering a wide range of technical expertise. His education is in the technical field with a BS in engineering. Mr. Priest has a wide range of technical abilities with an emphasis on project and program management, with extensive experience in various forms of information technology and executive management. 24 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 13 Spirent Team Credentials and Certifications • OSCP (Offensive Security Certified Professional) • OSCE (Offensive Security Certified Expert) • OSWE (Offensive Security Web Expert) • GXPN (GIAC Certified exploit researcher and advanced penetration tester) • GPEN (GIAC Penetration Tester) • GICSP (Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional) • NSA ISAM (NSA InfoSec Assessment Methodology Certification) • CISSP (Certified Information Systems Security Professional) • CREST CCT APP (Crest Certified Tester – Applications) • CREST CPSA (CREST Practitioner Security Analyst) • CREST CRT (CREST Registered Penetration Tester) • UCP (Unix Certified Programmer) • M.S Computer Science • M.S Electrical Engineering • B.S Computer Science • B.S Mechanical Engineering 25 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 14 Project Approach 26 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 15 Project Approach GTG’s assessment and strategic technology planning methodology is built on the combined experience of our group in delivering services to public agencies. GTG will perform an assessment of STUPD’s current technology use and the strengths and weaknesses of the current technology. The technology assessment activities will provide the foundation upon which the Information Technology Strategic Plan will be built. The principal consultants that will be involved with this project have completed a number of projects similar to the one proposed. Below is a list of IT Master/Strategic plans or IT Assessments that were completed by our team: City of Victorville – IT Strategic Plan – 2021 City of Hayward – IT Strategic Plan - 2009 City of Santa Barbara – IT Strategic Plan – 2012 Hayward Unified School District – Fiber Optic Plan - 2013 Alameda County Office of Education – IT Assessment – 2013 City of Benicia – IT Assessment – 2013 City of Alameda Housing Authority – IT Master Plan -2013 City of San Leandro – Wireless master Plan - 2013 City of Vacaville – IT Master Plan – 2014 City of Cupertino – IT Assessment – 2015 City of San Rafael – Document Management Plan - 2015 Dublin Unified School District – IT Assessment – 2015 Greater Vallejo Recreation District – IT Assessment – 2018 Town of Danville – IT Master Plan – 2016 Dublin San Ramon Service District – IT Master Plan – 2017 GTG’s methodology will be focused on the involvement and interaction with the department users of technology and those setting the business and operations direction for STUPD. GTG’s Information Technology Strategic Planning methodology creates processes that yield positive results. GTG’s proposed work plan includes several phases that build upon one another through actions and technical reports that ultimately become part of the South Tahoe Public Utility District Information Technology Strategic Plan: The first phase establishes the foundation for effective communication and the successful completion of the project. The second phase focuses the assessment on STUPD’s current environment and how technology resources support operations, gaps, opportunities and of STUPD’s technology service delivery and management. The next phase builds the tools and vision for the future of STUPD Portfolio of Technology. Here workshops and road maps contribute to the understanding of how that future can be achieved. The final step, which follows a structured methodology to develop a Master Plan that is supported by the information gathered in the “Assessment” and “Vision” phases to develop recommendations and projections for future technological improvements and business and operational process changes. 27 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 16 PROJECT INITIATION Planning Meeting The purpose of this phase is to share our proposed work plan and schedule. This stage includes confirming GTG’s understanding, as well as the understanding of the stakeholders, regarding the scope of work and the process for accomplishing the overall objectives of the project. GTG will meet with STUPD’s Project Manager and other key staff to refine and confirm the detailed scope of work, project timeline, deliverables, project status reporting methods, project participants (i.e., sponsor, subject matter experts, technical resources, etc.), and other items to ensure a well-planned project. During this step, we will tentatively build with STUPD workshop attendance lists as needed. Based on GTG’s experience on similar projects, Project Timeline, the project schedule shall be refined with the project manager from STUPD. The success of achieving this schedule largely depends on the availability, participation, and knowledge of STUPD assigned staff. GTG will submit monthly progress reports to STUPD showing completion progress for each task and associated subtasks. GTG will also provide an earned value report to compare completion progress versus budget spent. Deliverables: Draft and Final Project Plan. Project Initiation Meeting Since the project will have an organization-wide impact, it is important to proactively communicate with all impacted staff to ensure a clear understanding of project goals and objectives, roles and responsibilities, approach, tasks, and timeline. This meeting also provides the opportunity to introduce the GTG personnel to STUPD staff and should involve senior level management and project sponsors. It is important that all STUPD staff that will be involved in the project, regardless of their role, participate in the Project Initiation Meeting. Deliverable: Project Initiation Meeting ASSESSMENT PHASE In this step, GTG will work closely with the organization’s technology stakeholders to perform a comprehensive assessment of existing technologies and staffing, including technology and skill gaps that will identify current strengths and weaknesses, including high level documentation of existing District information systems. To reduce cost and add value, GTG plans to use STUPD’s existing survey conducted in 2020 to assess and determine overall satisfaction in terms of technology service delivery, support and projects desired. STUPD’s existing survey will be the mechanism that provides all technology users input into future technology needs. GTG will document the STUPD’s future vision for the use of technology and the gap analysis between that vision and the current technological realities. In those areas where the assessment provides an inventory of opportunities, GTG will provide one or more recommended actions, an assessment as to the relative priority of each recommendation, and an action plan that considers the relative importance of each recommendation and a recommended timeframe for implementation. 28 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 17 VISION PHASE Using the assessment of the current environment, the next phase focuses on planning the future. Key to how GTG’s Technology Assessment evaluates whether STUPD’s technology infrastructure and support organization is prepared to support the current and future needs of STUPD is by reviewing key operational “assessment dimensions,” which are described briefly below. This will assist GTG to collaboratively develop plans for STUPD’s systems. ♦ Governance – Evaluation of the current technology organization and assessment of its skills, staffing levels, and capability to maintain and support operation of current and future systems. ♦ Service Delivery – Evaluation of the daily operation of the technology environment including budget, service metrics, maintenance, help desk, configuration management, change management and capacity management. ♦ Application Support – Evaluation of the processes and methods to support business and operational applications. ♦ Security – Evaluation of STUPD’s technology security and data protection practices. ♦ Infrastructure – High level review of the network, servers, desktops, telephony, storage configurations, remote access, data storage, server management, telephony, enterprise systems, plant technology, enterprise asset management, document management, mobile technology, security, database architecture analysis, software applications, and operational procedures. ♦ Administration – Examination of the technology documentation relative to processes, policies, and procedures, standards, file retention, operating manuals, and training. These evaluative considerations will become a part of a framework to ensure current and future technology projects meet STUPD needs and can be supported long term. Using the above criteria and findings to date, GTG will facilitate a series of workshops with STUPD system users to assess and collaboratively develop plans for the current technology environment, articulate barriers to full utilization of those technologies, industry best practices, “Best of Breed” research, and planned uses and expansion of the technology in the future. The workshops will be held for the aggregated identified systems in the RFP and attended by department managers, super users and key support staff as directed by STUPD. GTG will work with STUPD to review and use the findings of previous stages. During this phase, GTG will facilitate workshops that uses a multi-step process to arrive at a STUPD -wide prioritization of identified projects that will provide the basis for roadmaps for the Information Technology Strategic Plan. The scope of work outlines the many documents that will make up the milestones to support the Plan. STRATEGIC PLAN GTG will incorporate work products and technical research from previous tasks as the foundation for the development of STUPD’s Strategic. GTG will use this information, as well as other information provided by staff and independent research, to create a draft of the Strategic Plan and review it with STUPD. Upon completion and acceptance of the final Technology Master Plan, GTG will give a professional presentation summary to multiple audiences, including the Executive Team and the Board if desired. Deliverable: Draft and Final Master Plan and Master Plan 29 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 18 PENETRATION TESTING GTG will be using SecurityLabs (sub-contractor) to perform the security testing segment of our tasks. SecurityLabs team of experts are dedicated to providing penetration testing, managed vulnerability scanning services, and security best practices training. Our team has experience working with numerous global institutions providing scanning and penetration services on networks, applications, and IoT devices as well as source code analysis. Following is a summary of the work they will perform as outlined in exhibit C. Proposed Scope of Testing Spirent will perform security testing services for the client including Internal Network Vulnerability Scan and External Network Penetration Testing. Internal Network Vulnerability Scan Spirent SecurityLabs Internal Network Vulnerability Scan will perform a thorough assessment of the in-scope target environment and outputs detailed recommendations to improve the security posture of the client’s internal infrastructure. Project Planning: • Spirent SecurityLabs and representatives of the client will formalize the scheduling, logistics and identifying client contacts. Assessment and analysis: • Spirent SecurityLabs will conduct an interactive port scan of the client’s internal infrastructure to identify active IP addresses and open ports. • All open ports on active IP addresses are analyzed to determine software, services and configurations. This information is then cross-referenced with a comprehensive commercial knowledge base of vulnerabilities to identify potential threats to the client's internal infrastructure. External Network Penetration Testing Spirent SecurityLabs External Network penetration test represents an effort to discover network infrastructure and services configuration weaknesses and to uncover exploitable vulnerabilities regarding insecure server configuration, default system passwords, unpatched servers with known vulnerabilities, insecure firewall configuration, insecure communications, information leakage and improper error handling. This test will be focused on pen testing network infrastructure such as firewalls, external routers, e-mail servers, web servers and virtual hosts, etc. through both automated and manual pen testing techniques, and then create a list of actionable weaknesses. The penetration testing project proceeds in the following phases: Project Planning: • Spirent SecurityLabs and representatives of the client will formalize the scheduling, logistics and identifying client contacts. Assessment and analysis: • Spirent SecurityLabs will perform Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) to gather as much information as possible about the client’s Internet footprint. • Spirent SecurityLabs will conduct an interactive port scan of the client’s external infrastructure to identify 30 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 19 active IP addresses and open ports. • All open ports on active IP addresses will then be analyzed to determine software, services, version and configuration for hosts. • While the exact activities within a penetration test will vary depending upon the technology used in the environment, engagements will generally adhere to the following approach: Reconnaissance – Passive information gathering about the target organization and the associated network. • Network Mapping • Automated Vulnerability Scanning • Service Enumeration • Service Banner and Version Enumeration • Testing for Published Vulnerabilities and Misconfigurations: o Insufficient and/or lack of authentication o Protocol weaknesses o Configuration issues o Unpatched Services, Applications as well as Operating Systems o Information Leakage • Exploitation • Identifying Administrative Interfaces: o Username Enumeration o Check for default and/or common passwords o Check for authentication/authorization issues o Logical errors • Post Exploitation • Data Exfiltration • Clean-up 31 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 20 Deliverables Spirent SecurityLabs will deliver a comprehensive report detailing any discovered security vulnerabilities, impact, suggested remediation, and ample evidence needed to support the finding, as well as information needed to reproduce the finding. Assumptions • Services will be provided remotely from Spirent Security Labs. • Client will provide access to specified target(s) to be assessed. • Client to identify the process to communicate any critical findings during assessment engagement. Remote assessment using a jump-box Testing will be conducted by SecurityLabs consultants remotely via a jump-box. The jump-box is a physical or virtual device (a virtual machine) that will be provided to the client prior to the commencement of the engagement and to be connected to their internal infrastructure in scope. We were provided with the information that the internal network is split into segments (three VLANs) so the client should work together with Spirent SecurityLabs on the assignment and help with switching the jump-box from one VLAN to another on-demand. 32 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 21 Roles and Responsibilities • Client - Complete an Assessment Questionnaire. • Client and Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant - Conduct a kick-off call prior to testing. • Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant to establish connectivity to the target(s). • Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant to Test the target(s). • Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant to Deliver reports and review findings Length of Testing The testing will be done in blocks, some done sequentially, some done concurrently by several individuals, in close coordination. The length of testing for the work currently proposed is 1- 2 weeks. The time period includes testing, creation of the draft report, review of draft report with the client, and issuance of the final report. Testing Locations Assessment Type Testing Location Internal Network Vulnerability Scan Remote with Spirent provided Jumpbox with the client’s onsite support External Network Penetration Test Remote 33 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 22 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program GTG follows the Project Management Book of Knowledge waterfall process to monitor and manage quality control. This includes creating approval criteria and setting quality standards during the initiating phase, deciding on what to focus on and building quality into the project during the planning phase, tracking status reporting and change control during the Executing, Monitoring and Controlling phase and documenting lessons learned and importing documents during the closing phase as outlined in the following image. The following five steps will be used during the four phases of the project management process to develop a quality control process: Phase I – Initiating Step 1. Set your quality standards. Phase II - Planning Step 2. Decide which quality standards to focus on. This allows your agency and GTG to ensure quality in all aspects of the project by focusing on the most important measures — those that have the biggest effect on your agency and your customer experience. This will improve the ability to get results quickly and also keeps the project team focused and avoiding becoming overwhelmed. 34 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 23 3. Create processes to build quality into the project. Well-designed processes lead to high-quality products and services. This step will include working closely with STUPD’s project manager in creating requirements to measure to and documenting team responsibilities for accountability. In addition to this, the two project managers will work closely together and with their teams to build a communication plan including Technical Memorandums, weekly status reports, the project schedule, budget, change and quality plans to monitor and control. Phase III – Executing, Monitoring and Controlling 4. Review your results to ensure quality standards are being met. During this step status reporting will be reviewed regularly to see how well the Technology Plan process is meeting its quality standard including change control and contract management. 5. Make improvements to ensure quality in future projects. There are always room for improvement. This phase includes a project evaluation and review of deliverables, lessons learned and archiving of documents for future projects to improve upon. GTG recommends creating a SharePoint or Cloud storage area hosted by STUPD for sharing documents during the project to assist with project collaboration, tracking and quality control. Outputs of Perform Quality Control • Measurements • Validated changes • Updates to project management plan and project documents • Change requests • Lessons learned • Validated deliverables 35 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 24 Project Time Schedule 36 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 25 Schedule The vulnerability assessment and Information Technology Strategic Plan Refresh will be done in conjunction with each other. The Disaster Recovery Plan refresh can be done in conjunction as well or start at the end of the assessment and plan completion. If on its own, we anticipate sixty days for completion. We anticipate the Disaster Recovery Plan update would be best done during the Strategic Plan Refresh to reduce cost. The time estimate stays the same, 60 days, either during or after the Strategic Plan process. If during, the cost to complete the DR refresh is $10,000. If after, we estimate $18,000 due to duplicating meetings and effort required if it is a standalone project. 37 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 26 Proof of Insurance Prior to commencement of work, Government Technology Group (GTG) will provide the South Tahoe Public Utility District with evidence of appropriate insurance, including general liability, professional liability, and automobile. GTG has no employees and is exempt from workers' compensation insurance coverage per state law. 38 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 27 Exhibit A – Scope of Work 39 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 28 Scope of Work to be Performed by GTG A: Expected Actions 1. Conduct an analysis of the District’s current technology environment. 2. Conduct an assessment of the District’s IT Governance. 3. Identify practical and relevant public sector industry standards related to IT management, internal and external factors and perform a SWOT Analysis. 4. Identify any existing and available outsourcing relationships and opportunities. 5. Conduct and internal and external penetration test per exhibit C. 6. Evaluate and identify means to accommodate current and emerging technology requirements and trends facing the district. 7. Assess organizational IT needs by meeting with representatives from the operational areas that IT supports either by producing a stakeholder survey results document or using the existing one performed by the agency to reduce strategic planning costs. 8. Identify workflow processes to ensure efficient service management and delivery to business units and the public. 9. Evaluate and identify IT processes or staffing deficiencies based on a global view of the projects identified both in the updated IT Strategic plan and the district’s ten- year plan. 10. Identify and assess any deficiencies or gaps in infrastructure, equipment, software, security, networks, email services, or business continuity. 11. As requested, perform a Disaster Recovery Plan Update per Exhibit F. Disaster Recovery (DR) is a strategic security planning model that seeks to protect an enterprise from the effects of natural or human-induced disaster. A DR plan maintains critical functions before, during, and after a disaster event, thereby causing minimal disruption to business continuity. Disaster recovery and data backups go hand in hand to support Business Continuity (BC). 40 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 29 B: Deliverables A final strategic plan will comprise: 1. An executive summary that effectively communicates the information reviewed 2. A summary of findings and prioritized recommendations 3. A comprehensive document of findings and prioritized recommendations 4. A project plan outlining projects by priority that includes timelines and cost estimates 5. Technology Stakeholder findings based off the Q4 2020 survey. 6. IT focused Disaster Recovery Plan 7. Executive summary and detailed findings documents from the penetration test C: ANTICIPATED WORK PRODUCTS GTG will draft a 5-year IT Master Plan consisting of an executive summary, findings, recommendations, prioritized recommendations, and proposed implementation plan consistent with the Request for Proposal. The plan shall compare current operations with industry standards and use such comparison as the basis for recommended actions. After review and consultation of the draft IT Master Plan with District staff, a final IT Master Plan, which will be created from the draft IT Master Plan and incorporate recommendations and strategies from District staff, will be submitted to the District for approval as necessary. Both the draft and final IT Master Plan shall include order of magnitude cost estimates associated with proposed work and resource procurement. As a final deliverable, GTG will provide a presentation to District if desired of the IT Master Plan, including methodologies utilized in its development. 41 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 30 Exhibit B – Project Costs 42 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 31 Standard Fee Schedule: The total fixed cost to the South Tahoe Public Utility District for an Information Technology Strategic Plan Refresh and Security test is $78,340 and includes all work to be completed by GTG as stated in this proposal including the Security Assessment and Disaster Recovery plan update. Both the Security Assessment and Disaster Recovery cost can be removed as desired by STUPD. If the Disaster Recovery Plan piece is removed, we estimate an additional $8,000 to complete the project on its own. GTG will invoice STUPD per the schedule below. Invoices are payable on net 30 terms from the date of invoice. This is an estimate per the documented scope of work (SoW) and is subject to change if the SoW changes. Description Cost Project Management $8,970.00 Project Initiation Project Kickoff Meeting Meetings and Plan Management Discovery $10,725.00 Asset Inventory Technology Trends and Review Needs and Goals Assessment Gap Analysis Vision $9,945.00 Develop Technology Recommendations Create Confidential Security Report Phased Implementation Plan Strategic Master Plan Final $13,650.00 Master Plan Draft STUPD Review of Master Plan Draft and Security Findings Report Out to Board, Management, Divisions Incidentals & Travel $1,950.00 Security Assessment and Vulnerability Testing $23,100.00 Disaster Recovery Refresh $10,000.00 Not to Exceed $78,340.00 Proposed Fee Schedule $23,502 upon contract signature $23,502 upon start of Vision Phase $23,502 upon start of Technology Master Plan $7,834 upon completion of Technology Master Plan 43 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 32 The following is GTG standard hourly fee schedule for prime and subconsultant’s project team members and administrative staff. All rates do include base wages, fringes, insurance, taxes, expendables, overhead, and profit. Hourly charge justification will be described in our issued invoices outside the scope work. Descriptions for work outside the scope will include date performed, description on worked performed and number of hours to complete the work. Prime/Senior Consultants - $195.00 per hour Subconsultants – Spirent’s standard rate outside the scope of this project is $250 per hour o Hourly travel rate for key personnel and any per-diem rates are not applicable for this project. o There are no anticipated rate increases for the duration of this project. 44 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 33 Exhibit C – Security Assessment Scope: Spirent SecurityLabs Proposal for South Tahoe Public Utility District (STUPD) CREST Certified International Member Company 45 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 About Spirent.................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 About Spirent SecurityLabs ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Proposed Scope of Testing ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Internal Network Penetration Testing ......................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 External Network Penetration Testing ........................................................................................ 6 1.3.3 Wireless Penetration Test ............................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Deliverables ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Assumptions ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................ 9 1.7 Pricing .............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.8 Length of Testing ............................................................................................................................ 10 1.9 Testing Locations ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.10 Team Credentials and Certifications .............................................................................................. 11 1.11 Media and Publications .................................................................................................................. 11 46 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 About Spirent Spirent Communications enables innovations in communications technologies that help connect people. Whether it is service providers, data centers, enterprise IT networks, mobile communications, connected cars vehicles, or the Internet of Things, Spirent solutions are working behind the scenes to help the world communicate and collaborate faster, better, and more securely. The world’s leading innovators rely on Spirent's expertise to help them design, develop and deliver best-in-class solutions to their customers. Our broad portfolio of innovative products and services is organized into three operating segments that address a wide range of our customers’ needs. Spirent’s Networks and Applications, Wireless and Service Experience, and Service Assurance solutions support customers’ needs across the entire technology lifecycles from proof of concept to subscriber experience. With more than 1,700 customers across Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, and North America our cutting-edge verification, assessments, and analytics solutions help to deliver unsurpassed service experience while meeting business objectives of reducing churn, increasing revenue, and strengthening market share. Spirent specializes in helping enterprises and government agencies effectively create custom testing strategies to test and monitor critical infrastructures such as networks, wireless, web and mobile applications, embedded devices, IoT devices, and industrial control systems. Our customers depend on us to help them take proactive measures to protect against cybercrime and data breaches from internal and external threats. 1.2 About Spirent SecurityLabs SecurityLabs team of experts are dedicated to providing penetration testing, managed vulnerability scanning services, and security best practices training. Our team has experience working with numerous global institutions providing scanning and penetration services on networks, applications, and IoT devices as well as source code analysis with extensive experience with local government clients such as: • City of San Jose, CA • City of Mission Viejo, CA • City of Rockville, MD 47 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces 1.3 Proposed Scope of Testing Spirent will perform security testing services for the client including Internal Network Penetration Testing, External Network Penetration Testing, and Wireless Penetration Testing. 1.3.1 Internal Network Penetration Testing Spirent SecurityLabs Internal Network penetration test performs a thorough assessment of the in- scope target environment and outputs a detailed deliverable with both tactical & strategic recommendations to improve the security posture of the customer’s infrastructure. Although the entire process comprises both automated and manual testing, the main emphasis is placed on manual penetration testing to avoid generic output. The internal network penetration test report outlines the customer’s current state of security through an executive summary, implemented protection mechanisms, discovered vulnerabilities, their exploitation, and impact, evidence of exploitation, risk rating, as well as strategic recommendations. While the exact activities within a penetration test will vary depending upon the technology used in the target environment, the following list illustrates some of the attack vectors covered by Spirent SecurityLabs: Unauthenticated Host discovery Vulnerability Scan Port Scan 1-65535 (TCP and UDP) with ping disabled Enumerate Domain Users Service enumeration and banner grabbing Identify admin interfaces OS Fingerprint Default and Common passwords check SNMP Test - Read and Write using common strings SMB Check ARP cache poisoning LLMNR / NBT-NS spoofing Authenticated Enumeration of local users through NetBIOS NULL session. Check user permissions Check user groups 48 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces Check the last logged on date Enumerate other users on the system Check running services Enumerate other network interfaces Perform traffic capture Identify established sessions/connections Enumerate connected users Authenticated Scan (key-based for Linux) Check running services Check services that run on startup Perform scanning and analysis on network peers Windows o Unauthenticated Enumerate open ports Establish null session Enumerate Shares Audit NetBIOS SMB Scanning Bruteforce Shares Enumerate Users Enumerate Active Sessions o Authenticated Dump SAM File for offline cracking Enumerate Shares Enumerate Active Processes System Information Missing Patches and Known Vulnerabilities Linux o Unauthenticated Authentication Options Identify default or weak SSH Keys Root logins Inetd services Session prediction Unauthenticated services (anonymous FTP, NFS, etc.) Unencrypted services 49 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces o Authenticated View files in other user's directories Check SU ID on binaries Check shells available to users Check for locations logs are written to Check for trusted systems Examine .history, .bash history etc. Check for cron jobs for anything writing to a remote system Check for credentials in scripts Check for SSH keys to other systems Copy shadow password file for offline cracking 1.3.2 External Network Penetration Testing Spirent SecurityLabs External Network penetration test represents an effort to discover network infrastructure and services configuration weaknesses and to uncover exploitable vulnerabilities regarding insecure server configuration, default system passwords, unpatched servers with known vulnerabilities, insecure firewall configuration, insecure communications, information leakage, and improper error handling. This test will be focused on pen testing network infrastructure such as firewalls, external routers, e-mail servers, web servers, virtual hosts, etc. through both automated and manual pen testing techniques, and then create a list of actionable weaknesses. The penetration testing project proceeds in the following phases: 1. Project Planning: • Spirent SecurityLabs and representatives of the client will formalize the scheduling, logistics, and identifying client contacts. 2. Assessment and analysis: • Spirent SecurityLabs will perform Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) to gather as much information as possible about the client’s Internet footprint. • Spirent SecurityLabs will conduct an interactive port scan of the client’s external infrastructure to identify active IP addresses and open ports. • All open ports on active IP addresses will then be analyzed to determine software, services, version, and configuration for hosts. • While the exact activities within a penetration test will vary depending upon the technology used in the environment, engagements will generally adhere to the following approach: Reconnaissance – Passive information gathering about the target organization and 50 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces the associated network. i. Network Mapping ii. Automated Vulnerability Scanning iii. Service Enumeration iv. Service Banner and Version Enumeration v. Testing for Published Vulnerabilities and Misconfigurations: 1. Insufficient and/or lack of authentication 2. Protocol weaknesses 3. Configuration issues 4. Unpatched Services, Applications as well as Operating Systems 5. Information Leakage vi. Exploitation vii. Identifying Administrative Interfaces: 1. Username Enumeration 2. Check for default and/or common passwords 3. Check for authentication/authorization issues 4. Logical errors viii. Post Exploitation ix. Data Exfiltration x. Clean-up 1.3.3 Wireless Penetration Test The Spirent SecurityLabs Wireless Penetration test aims to gauge the resilience of our customer’s wireless infrastructure against various attack vectors. 1. Project planning: • Spirent consultants identify key characteristics of the customer’s asset and construct guidelines for an assessment. 2. Assessment and analysis: The wireless security assessment ensures a thorough coverage through various phases starting with a site survey to map the wireless network and identify rogue access points. Although not exhaustive, below is a list of tests performed during the wireless Pen test: • Site Survey and Enumerate wireless networks • 802.11 Network Reconnaissance 51 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces • Enumeration of Authentication Protocols • Testing Access Control • Testing segregation between guest and corporate network • Identify weakly encrypted networks • Capture and analyze wireless network traffic to gain information about internal systems and wireless network peers • Attack captive-portal authentication gateways • Gain unauthorized access to the administrative interfaces • Perform Evil-Twin attacks, spoofing, or wireless Man-in-the-Middle as allowed by the Rules of Engagement. • Access point de-authentication to test resiliency against Denial-of-Service attacks • Access point configuration review, including: Network design & architecture Policies RADIUS server configuration review (if any) Rules review for Access control, filtering, authentication/authorization, logging, and segmentation 1.4 Deliverables Report Spirent SecurityLabs will deliver a comprehensive report detailing any discovered security vulnerabilities, impact, suggested remediation, and ample evidence needed to support the finding, as well as information needed to reproduce the finding. 1.5 Assumptions o Services will be provided remotely from Spirent Security Labs. o The client will provide access to specified target(s) to be assessed. o Client to identify the process to communicate any critical findings during assessment engagement. 1.5.1.1 Remote assessment using a jump-box Testing will be conducted by SecurityLabs consultants remotely via a jump-box. The jump-box is a physical or virtual device (a virtual machine) that will be provided to the client prior to the commencement of the engagement and to be connected to their internal infrastructure in scope. 52 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces We were provided with the information that the internal network is split into segments (three VLANs) so the client should work together with Spirent SecurityLabs on the assignment and help with switching the jump-box from one VLAN to another on-demand. 1.6 Roles and Responsibilities • Client - Complete an Assessment Questionnaire. • Client and Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant - Conduct a kick-off call prior to testing. • Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant to establish connectivity to the target(s). • Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant to Test the target(s). • Spirent SecurityLabs Consultant to Deliver reports and review findings 53 Spirent SecurityLabs © Spirent Communications . All Rights Reserved. Spirent.com/ product s / sec urity labs - cybersecurity - servi ces 1.7 Length of Testing The testing will be done in blocks, some done sequentially, some done concurrently by several individuals, in close coordination. The length of testing for the work currently proposed is 2-3 weeks. The time period includes testing, creation of the draft report, review of the draft report with the client, and issuance of the final report. 1.8 Testing Locations Assessment Type Testing Location Internal Network Penetration Test Remote with Spirent provided Jumpbox with the client’s onsite support External Network Penetration Test Remote Wireless Penetration Test Remote with Spirent provided Jumpbox with the client’s onsite support 1.9 Media and Publications Spirent SecurityLabs Website: https://www.spirent.com/products/securitylabs-cybersecurity-services Blog: http://www.spirent.com/Blogs/Security Twitter: @SpirentSecurity Spirent Security Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj4pLd3dUdl4p5w1Gcv-hmQ 54 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 43 Exhibit D – Ad ditions and Exceptions: 1. Contract Article III Section F.1 GTG does not have employees, Workers Compensation is not needed. 2. Contract Article III Section F.2 The agency does not own any company cars. It’s Principals maintain $500,000 personal auto coverage. 3. The City included options for a Strategic Plan Refresh, Vulnerability Assessment and Disaster Recovery plan option. These projects can work in conjunction or independently including inclusion or exclusion of cost to complete them as outlined in the Standard Fee Schedule section exhibit B. 55 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 44 Exhibit E – Project References 56 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 45 Project References Three Project References that best support the proposed teams’ stated qualifications: Janine Burrier Assistant Director of Housing: Policy, Training and Outreach Janine.Burrier@scchousingauthority.org Office - (408)993-3067 Santa Clara County Housing Authority Project Manager for Interest List, Tenant Application Portal Business Systems June 2019 – November 2021 Savita Chaudhary Director of Information Technology/CIO, City of Berkeley SChaudhary@ci.berkeley.ca.us Office – (510) 981-6426 City of Berkeley (formally with the City of Vacaville) Vacaville IT Strategic Planning, Technology Assessment, Gap Analysis, Business Process Review 2016 City of Lancaster (formerly with the City of Victorville) Joe Haggard Senior IT Manager jhaggard@cityoflancasterca.org (661) 723-6060 Victorville IT Master Plan, 2021 57 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 46 Exhibit F - Resumes JEFF LEWIS, PMP, CGEIT – Principal Consultant for Overall Project Management Jeff Lewis is a veteran in the field of Information Technology and has a career that spans over thirty-eight years in public, private, and non-profit sectors including positions in local government, medical, and IT consulting. He has served as Chief Information Officer for multiple local government and non-profit agencies, is a founding member of the Government Technology Group (www.GovTechGroup.net) and has served as the Director of Smart Region Initiative at Joint Venture Silicon Valley. As a CIO Jeff has led Smart City, broadband, IT strategic and GIS planning, enterprise architecture, policy, and research initiatives for local government. Specific areas of responsibility included developing and advancing Smart City initiatives, digital government, security policy, innovation, and emerging technologies. During this tenure, he served as the lead executive for numerous enterprise IT initiatives, projects, and efforts to improve business processes. Jeff is a lifetime member of the Municipal Information Systems Association of California (MISAC) and has won the MISAC Excellence award 10 years in a row for implementing best practices in local government. Jeff has served as President of MISAC, and currently serves on the Education and Smart City committees. EDUCATION: Masters Public Administration (MPA) Stanislaus State, Turlock CA Bachelor of Science, Stanislaus State, Turlock, CA Emphasis: Computer Science Minor Stanislaus State, Turlock, CA Emphasis: Business Administration Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT (CGEIT) Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA) Project Management Professional (PMP) Project Management Institute (PMI) 58 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 47 QUALIFICATIONS: • Technology Strategic Planning • Project management and oversight services. • Broadband Solutions: Creation of Broadband plans, networks and best practices. • Smart City: Development and implement Smart City Solutions including support for the Internet of Things (IoT). • Cloud Strategy and Implementation • Security: IT Security audits and implementations protecting intellectual property. • Business Process Improvement • Contract Negotiation • Mobility: e-commerce, e-business strategies and wireless infrastructure for field operations and community access. • Network Planning: Architect enterprise wide network infrastructure. • Project Management: Created project management program and materials. • Governance: Develop governance programs • Training Program Development • Systems Migration Planning • Policies and Procedures Development • MISAC Award Application Assistance • Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery expertise. • Geographical Information Systems (GIS). • Cable Franchise Agreements (PEG). • Change Management expertise. • eBusiness/eGovernment and World Wide Web presence. • Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation. 59 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 48 MARK GUENTHER, CGCIO – Principal Consultant for Systems Review and Evaluation Mr. Guenther is also a recently retired municipal Chief Information Officer who has been part of several organizations as detailed in his résumé. Mr. Guenther is currently an independent technology consultant offering a wide range of technical expertise. In both the CIO and consulting roles, he has overseen the successful implementation of city wide enterprise systems including finance (AP, GL, PR, Budget), community development (Permits) and utility billing functions including online access to permit and utility accounts for customers (Tyler Munis) for Hayward, California and Danville, California. Prior to focusing on IT management, he implemented numerous systems, both those which were developed in-house and others that were configured commercial packages which created automated systems for financial and community development functions. EDUCATION: Certified Government Chief Information Officer (CGCIO™) Rutgers University/Public Technology Institute, Newark, New Jersey Bachelor of Science University of San Francisco Major: Applied Economics Associate of Arts Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill, California Emphasis: Computer Science QUALIFICATIONS: • 30+ years’ experience in the information technology field • Staff development and mentoring • Project management and oversight • Change Management expertise. • Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation • Permit and Inspection System implementation • Public Safety System implementation, including Police and Fire • Document and Enterprise Content Management • Business Analysis and Business Process Review • eBusiness/eGovernment and Web presence. • Internal Service Fund (ISF) budget preparation and oversight. 60 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 49 EXPERIENCE: Government Technology Group Principal, Information Technology Consultant, June 2019 to Present City of Hayward, California Director of Information Technology/CIO, September 2012 to May 2015 (Retired) Information Technology Manager, September 2002 to September 2012 (Retired) Programmer/Analyst, January 1990 to September 2002 Western Exhibitors, Inc, San Francisco, California Data Processing Manager, April 1982 to January 1990 61 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 50 CLANCY PRIEST, IEEE – Principal Consultant for Network(s) Review and Evaluation Mr. Priest is a retired 30+ year municipal Chief Information Officer who has been part of several organizations as detailed in his résumé. Mr. Priest is currently an independent technology consultant offering a wide range of technical expertise. His education is in the technical field with a baccalaureate in engineering. Mr. Priest has a wide range of technical abilities with an emphasis on project and program management, with extensive experience in various forms of information technology and executive management. Mr. Priest has a vast knowledge base of the various forms of automation and of the continual technological evolutions that prevail in the technology profession. EDUCATION: Energy Systems Engineer Oberstufenzentrum für Elektro-und Energietechnik, Berlin, Germany Major: Electro-Mechanical Engineering. (Baccalaureate) Energy Systems Practical Internship Ausbildungszentrum für Siemens Aktiengesellshaft, Berlin, Germany Practical Internship in Engineering Program. (Professional License) Commercial & Industrial Development Management University of California, Irvine 2-year program for Project Management. (Certificate) QUALIFICATIONS: • Technology Strategic Planning • Project management and oversight services. • Change Management expertise. • Independent Validation & Verification (IV&V) of projects. • Telecommunications and Interoperability planning, including RoIP, P25 compliance. • Public Safety technologies, including Police, Fire and Military • Business Process Review and engineering. • Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery expertise. • Network Systems (LAN, WAN, MAN), including infrastructure planning. • Dataflow planning (routing, switching, etc.). • Geographical Information Systems (GIS). • Telephony telecommunications including Cellular, PBX and VoIP. • Cable Franchise Agreements (PEG). • eBusiness/eGovernment and World Wide Web presence. • Inter- Intra- and Extranet planning and implementation. • Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation. • Document and Enterprise Content Management. • Disaster Recovery, Database Management and System Security. • Training and needs assessment, Technology Strategic Planning. • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI) studies. • Internal Service Fund (ISF) budget preparation and oversight. • Inter-Departmental technology planning. 62 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 51 EXPERIENCE: Government Technology Group Principal, Information Technology Consultant, June 2019 to Present City of Hayward, California Director of Information Technology/CIO, February 2002 to September 2012 (Retired) C. R. Priest, Consulting Sole Proprietor, Independent Information Technology Consultant, March 2001 to February 2002 and September 2012 to June 2019 City of San Buenaventura, (Ventura) California CIO, April 1999 to March 2001 City of Chico, California Director of Information Systems, January 1996 to April 1999 County of Riverside - GSA Purchasing and Material Services Department Departmental Information Systems Coordinator, September 1992 to January 1996 RELATED PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: State License; Energy Systems Engineer issued by the Department of Industry and Commerce, Federal Republic of Germany State License; Energy Systems Technician issued by the Department of Industry and Commerce, Federal Republic of Germany City of Chico Management Academy Graduate (with curriculum from CSU Chico) VOLUNTEER WORK: Advisory Committee Member/Speaker, Bay Area Technology Forum, 2008 - present. Technical advisor to the Bay Area UASI BayRICS Communication System 63 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 52 Exhibit G – Backup, Restore, and Disaster Recovery (BRDR) 64 209.678.3077 ♦ Projects@govtechgroup.net Copyright© Government Technology Group (GTG) 2022 All rights reserved. Page | 53 Backup, Restore, and Disaster Recovery Backup and Restore (BR): The copying of data into a secondary form (i.e., archive file), which can be used to restore the original file in the event of a disaster event. Disaster Recovery (DR): A strategic security planning model that seeks to protect an enterprise from the effects of natural or human-induced disaster, such as a tornado or cyber-attack. A DR plan aims to maintain critical functions before, during, and after a disaster event, thereby causing minimal disruption to business continuity. Disaster recovery and data backups go hand in hand to support Business Continuity (BC). The Differences Backups are the copies of essential files that enable a full restore. Most organizations utilize multiple backup solutions at the same time. Listed below are some of different types of backup solutions: • Full Backup • Incremental Backup • Differential Backup • Mirror Backup • Local Backup • Offsite Backup • Online Backup Remote backups refer to the actual copies or copying of files and data. Disaster recovery (DR), on the other hand, encompasses the full strategy for responding to a disaster event and putting the backups into action. DR is the umbrella under which backups reside. You may have a specific data backup strategy but responding to a disaster means preparing for a worst-case scenario. Who oversees getting applications back online? How will you manage customer relations if there is a data breach? The difference between disaster recovery and backups is about answering these types of questions and go to the core of a BRDR plan. Creating A Disaster Recovery Plan The difference between disaster recovery and backups is about strategy versus solution. A DR plan is strategic and encompasses a whole philosophy of thinking. Creating a disaster recovery plan is dependent on completing a risk assessment, business impact analysis and infrastructure assessment that will help you identify critical applications, IT services and the infrastructure to support it. Then an organization can create Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) based on the unique environment. Only after completing these initial steps can an organization begin the process of developing a disaster recovery plan that includes both prevention and response protocols. GTG approach to BRDR The difference between disaster recovery and backups may be clear, but a comprehensive BRDR plan will leverage those differences to develop a comprehensive DR strategy that includes an effective backup policy, disaster prevention strategies, and response protocols. Almost 90% of businesses without a DR plan fail after a disaster. The best way to prevent this type of failure is to be prepared by creating a disaster recovery strategy before disaster strikes. 65 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6a TO: Board of Directors FROM: Adrian Combes, Senior Engineer MEETING DATE: May 5, 2022 ITEM – PROJECT NAME: Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: 1) Approve the proposed Scope of Work from Water Systems Consulting, Inc., to provide engineering services for the Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project; and, 2) Authorize the General Manager to execute Task Order No. 2 in the amount $116,411. DISCUSSION: On March 7, 2022, the District issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking engineering design services for the Bijou Sewer Pump Station Rehabilitation Project (Project). On April 11, 2022, the District received two proposals in response to the RFP. After review of the submissions, staff selected Water Systems Consulting, Inc., (WSC) as the most qualified consultant based on their Proposal. Background The Bijou Pump Station is one of the District’s “Big 5 Pump Stations” and was originally constructed in 1955. It collects all the wastewater for the tourist corridor in South Lake Tahoe from Ski Run Boulevard to the Stateline and consists of three centrifugal pumps in a dry pit/wet pit configuration. The pump station is comprised of two buildings and underground infrastructure on a small 50’x50’ parcel in the parking lot of McDonalds at 3715 Lake Tahoe Blvd. The main building houses the electrical equipment and stairs to the dry pit where the existing pumps are located. The main building also overlies the wet well which is accessed separately from the backside of the building and is separated by a concrete wall. The wet well is a permitted confined space entry with a concrete staircase that is an ongoing maintenance and safety concern. The second building on the site houses the permanent generator and transfer switch. In 2018, the District performed a condition assessment, alternatives assessment and seismic assessment of the Big 5 Pump Stations, which recommended various improvements for the Bijou Pump Station. Some of the improvements were minor; however, the critical factor driving this Project is the need to replace the antiquated electrical equipment for which replacement parts are no longer available. Preliminary layout has indicated that there is not enough space in the existing buildings to install the new electrical equipment and maintain required safety clearances per the electrical General Manager John Thiel Directors Chris Cefalu Shane Romsos David Peterson Kelly Sheehan Nick Exline 66 Adrian Combes Page 2 May 5, 2022 code. Therefore, a component of the Project will be determining how to make additional space for the new electrical gear. Since the original assessments of the pump station were completed, staff has expressed concerns over confined space safety associated with the wet well, which prompted a risk assessment by the District’s Insurance company – Association of California Water Agencies Joint Power Insurance Authority (ACWA/JPIA). The results of this assessment recommended modification to the wet well to limit the need for regular entry and improve the ability to make a confined space rescue. This modification is a significant addition to the Project Scope requiring evaluation of alternatives prior to development of construction documents. Scope of Work The proposed design work will be performed over a period of one year in multiple phases. Task 1, being authorized under this request, includes an initial environmental permitting (California Environmental Quality Act), an alternatives analysis of options for pump station rehabilitation and development of operational alternatives. Operational alternatives are needed because three pump stations pump into the same force mains that have issues operating together. The final operational strategy for the three stations needs to be understood so that appropriate controls and instrumentation can be built into this Project. Task 2 is the design of the Project includes a Basis of Design Report, development of construction drawings and specifications, and final environmental permitting. Task 3 includes engineering services during the bidding process which will include attending the pre-bid meeting, answering technical questions, and preparing addenda. Task 1 (Data Collection, Review and Analysis) is expected to be complete by mid- September 2022. At this time, staff is only requesting budget for Task 1 in the amount of $116,411 as shown on the attached Cost Proposal. The total budget for the Project including construction is $3,110,000. To move directly into design upon completion of Task 1, staff expects to return to the Board in July to request authorization of Task 2. Task 3 (Bidding Services) will be requested from the Board along with the Authorization to Bid in 2023. Details for all tasks (alternatives evaluation through bidding support) are provided in the attached Scope of Work, including the Cost Proposal and Project Schedule. The work will be performed by WSC under a Master Services Agreement for Consulting Services and Task Order No. 2 for Task 1 of the defined Scope of Work. SCHEDULE: May 2022 – July 2024 COSTS: $116,411 (Task 1) ACCOUNT NO: 10.30.8058 (BJUSPS) BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE: $206,000 (2022/23) ATTACHMENTS: Scope of Work, Budget, Project Schedule ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: Sewer GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO 67 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 1 of 8 Task 1.0 Data Collection, Review and Analysis Task includes the scoped work for the preliminary design phase of the project. 1.1 Preliminary Design Phase Meetings and Site Visits The preliminary design includes in the following meetings · Kickoff meeting: 2 hour in person meeting, attended by WSC project manager and project engineer. · Site Visit: 2 hour visit, scheduled the same day as the project kickoff meeting attended by WSC project manager, project engineer and the project electrical and structural leads. Site visit to confirm pump station conditions and gather site information as required to perform the alternative analysis. · Kickoff follow up meeting: 2 hour virtual meeting attended by WSC project manager and project engineer. · Draft Alternatives Analysis Review Meeting: 2 hour virtual meeting attended by WSC project manager and project engineer. · Control Analysis kickoff meeting and site visit to the 3 pump stations that convey flows into the dual forcemains. This assumes a 1-hr in person meeting followed by site visits to the 3 pump stations. · Draft Control Analysis TM review meeting. 2 hour virtual meeting attended by WSC project manager and project controls task lead. WSC to prepare agendas, meeting minutes and presentation materials for in- person and virtual meetings. Deliverable: Meeting agendas, presentation materials, and minute minutes. Site visit findings and documentation to be built into project deliverables. 1.2 Background Document Request and Data Review Prepare a background document request to discuss at the project kickoff meeting. Review background data provided and incorporate the findings into alternative analysis and final design deliverables. Deliverable: Background document request in PDF format. 1.3 Alternatives Analysis Development and coordinate selection criteria with the District for the project alternatives. Perform hydraulic calculations and modeling coordination for pump selection Perform alternative analysis of up to (3) selected project alternatives. For each project alternative the WSC team will provide: 68 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 2 of 8 · Text description of the alternative · 10% level markups based on the PDF record drawing backgrounds showing upper level and lower level modifications to the existing pump station · Proposed new facilities and site improvements associated with the alternative · AACE Level 2 Cost Estimate · Qualitative analysis of the pros and cons of the alternatives · Rankings of the alternatives using the selection criteria. 1.4 Alternative Analysis TM Develop Alternative Analysis Technical Memorandum (TM) that summarizes the alternative analysis and project recommendations. TM will include the following sections: · Purpose & Background · Selection Criteria · Alternative Descriptions with 10% level figures · Alternative Analysis text and tables to summarize results of the alternative analysis · AACE Level 2 cost estimate for each alternative · Recommended project for final design Deliverable: Draft and Final Alternative Analysis TM in PDF format. Assumption: Figures for the Alternative analysis TM will be created in PDF format. 1.5 Dual Forcemain System Control Strategy Analysis and TM Evaluate control strategies for the 3 lift stations that pump into the dual forcemains. Determine the improvements required at the other two pump stations and for communication between SCADA and the stations required to implement the recommended control strategy. Confirm the selected pumps for Bijou that will function in the initial operating conditions and after a selected control strategy for all the lift station is implemented. Develop a brief Technical Memorandum (TM) that summarizes the controls recommendations for the dual forcemain system. TM will include the following: · Purpose & Background · Analysis Summary · Recommended Control Strategy for Dual forcemain system · Required improvements to implement recommended control strategy broken down by location 69 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 3 of 8 Deliverable: Draft and Final Control Strategy TM in PDF format. Assumption: WSC to receive the calibrated collection system model ready for analysis of control and pump sizing scenarios. Collection system model is in InfoSwim. Model to include pump curves for relevant collection system pump stations and be calibrated by Carollo. 1.6 CEQA Preliminary Design Phase Work Biological, Land Capability and Cultural Resource Surveys · A desk-top survey will be conducted for both biological resources and cultural resources. We do not expect a need for additional pedestrian surveys for biological resources based on the existing developed (paved) condition of the site and its disturbed surroundings. · A site survey will be conducted by an architectural historian of the two structures that were built in 1955, to assess eligibility as historic resources. CEQA NOE · WSC subconsultant Cardno to prepare CEQA Notice of Exemption for the project site. Deliverable: CEQA Notice of Exemption, draft and final in PDF format Task 2.0 Design Task includes the scope of work for the preliminary design phase of the project. 2.1 Design Phase Meetings and Site Visits The design includes in the following meetings · Controls and Instrumentation Workshop: 2 hour in person meeting, attended by WSC project manager and project controls lead. Meeting will review the details of how the District envisions the station operation as well as instrumentation and data collection requirements. · Site Visit: 2 hour visit, scheduled the same day as one of the design review meetings attended by up to 4 team members. · Design memorandum and 30% Drawings Review Meeting: 2 hour virtual meeting attended by WSC project manager and project engineer. · 65% Design Review Meeting: 2 hour virtual meeting attended by WSC project manager and project engineer. · 90% Design Review Meeting: 2 hour in person meeting attended by WSC project manager and project engineer. WSC to prepare agendas, meeting minutes and presentation materials for in- person and virtual meetings. 70 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 4 of 8 Deliverable: Meeting agendas, presentation materials, and minute minutes. Site visit findings and documentation to be built into project deliverables. 2.2 Design Memorandum WSC to provide a design memorandum and 30% level drawings for the selected project alternative. The design memorandum will include: · Design Criteria as applicable to the selected alternative · Preferred vendors for major equipment items · Pump design conditions based on modelling conditions for the pump station · Pump selection from two vendors preferred by the District · Pump station draft operational control description · AACE Level 3 cost estimate. The 30% level drawings that will be submitted with the draft Design Memorandum are outlined in Table 1 (see subtask 2.3) below. Deliverable: Draft and Final Design Memorandum in PDF format. 30% drawings to be provided with the Draft Design Memorandum, comments received will be incorporated into the 65% design documents. 2.3 65%, 90% and Final Design Drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD. Design plans will be developed utilizing industry standard scales, in English (not metric) engineering units. Table 1 shows a preliminary listing of drawings anticipated for the project, which assumes no new wet well or valve vault will be constructed. An optional task is included in this scope for wet well and valve vault. The preliminary list of design drawings is provided as Table 1 below. Table 1. Preliminary List of Drawings No. Sheet No. Drawing Description General 1 G1 Cover Sheet, List of Drawings, and Location Map 2 G2 General Abbreviations 3 G3 General Symbols Demolition 4 D1 Demolition Plan 5 D2 Demolition Sections 6 D3 Demolition Photos and Details 1 7 D4 Demolition Photos and Details 2 71 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 5 of 8 Table 1. Preliminary List of Drawings No. Sheet No. Drawing Description Structural 8 GS1 General Notes 9 GS2 General Notes, Legend, and Abbreviations 10 GS3 General Notes, Special Inspection 11 GS4 Standard Details – Concrete I 12 GS5 Standard Details – Concrete II 13 GS6 Standard Details – Modifications to Existing Structures 14 GS7 Standard Details – Metal Fabrications 15 S1 Electrical Room Floor – Plan 16 S2 Electrical Room Floor – Sections 17 S3 Electrical Room Floor – Sections and Details Architectural 18 A1 Roof Plan, Schedules, Building Data 19 A2 Exterior Elevations 20 A3 Architectural Details Mechanical 21 M1 Mechanical Abbreviations and Symbols 22 M2 Pump Station Plan 23 M3 Wet Well Plan and Sections 24 M4 Pump Station Sections and Details 1 25 M5 Pump Station Sections and Details 2 26 M6 Mechanical Details 1 27 M7 Mechanical Details 2 Coatings/ Corrosion Protection 28 Z1 Wet well/Dry Put Coatings Plan 29 Z2 Wet well/Dry Put Coatings Sections 30 Z3 Coating Details Electrical 31 E1 Electrical Symbols 32 E2 Electrical Single Line Diagram 33 E3 Electrical Site Plan 34 E4 Power Plan 35 E5 Lighting Plan 72 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 6 of 8 Table 1. Preliminary List of Drawings No. Sheet No. Drawing Description 36 E6 Schedules 37 E7 Control Diagrams 38 E8 Electrical Details 1 39 E9 Electrical Details 2 Instrumentation 32 I1 Instrumentation Symbols 33 I2 Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID) - Pump Station 34 I3 SCADA Block Diagram Specifications will be prepared in Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) format using Microsoft Word. Our budget for this task assumes that District will prepare and provide a set of General Conditions and Special Provisions, bid form, example agreement and other “front-end” sections for WSC to incorporate into the bid set. Technical specifications will be formatted per WSC standards. Engineer's OPCC cost will be prepared in Microsoft Excel at the 65%, 90%, and final design levels. AACE level 4 costs estimate to be provided. Deliverable: 65%, 90% and final drawings, specifications and cost estimates. 65% and 90% submittals will be in PDF format. The final drawings will be provided in full size and half size format. Final specifications, schedule and cost estimate will be provided in editable electronic formats. 2.4 ASCE 41 and ACI 350 Structural Analysis Prior to the site visit, a TJCAA Engineer will perform a desk-top structural evaluation of the Pump Station against current design Codes and Standards to verify the Pump Station will remain operable following a code-level seismic event. This evaluation will include current Code requirements for various load combinations. Hydrodynamic forces will be determined to assess the lateral forces on the Pump Station walls and internal components during the design seismic event. The assessment will be limited to demonstrating that the existing Pump Station provides a structural performance level equivalent to performance Level 2-A, Damage Control (structural) and Operational (non-structural) for an ASCE/SEI 41-17, BSE-1E/2E level earthquake. 73 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 7 of 8 2.5 TRPA and CEQA Final Design Phase TRPA Clearance · WSC subconsultant Cardno to prepare TRPA IEC prepared for project site for District review and approval. Permitting · WSC subconsultant Cardno will assist in obtaining the necessary permits for project implementation. Anticipated permits include: · City of South Lake Tahoe Grading Permit and · Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board authorization for Low Threat Discharge Permit, should site dewatering become necessary. · WSC subconsultant Cardno will prepare a project description outline with determination of impact quantities from WSC. · WSC subconsultant Cardno will prepare review of permit applications prior to submittal for City of South Lake Tahoe and the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board. Geotechnical Support Services · As required for TRPA permitting for excavations greater than 5-ft, a single boring and associated geotechnical analysis will be provided for the flexible coupling installation on the discharge forcemain. Deliverable: Technical memo documenting the desk-top biological resource assessment and land capability (LCD 1b, SEZ. If required, the technical memo will recommend strategies to avoid or mitigate potential impacts. Deliverable: Technical Report documenting the desk-top a cultural resource assessments and architectural historian assessment of structures. Deliverable: TRPA IEC, Draft and Final in PDF format Task 3.0 Bidding Services Task includes the scope of work for the bidding phase of the project. 3.1 Attend Prebid Conference WSC project manager will assist the District with conducting a job walk and will attend the prebid conference to meet with prospective contractors and answer contractor questions. 3.2 Respond to Bidder Questions WSC will assist the District is responding to Bidder questions. WSC will provide written responses in Microsoft Word or Excel format to the District to include in 74 SCOPE OF WORK Bijou Pump Station Rehabilitation Project 4/11/2022 Page 8 of 8 Addenda issued during the bidding phase. Current budget assumes up to 2 addenda. Deliverable: Responses to bidder questions in Microsoft Word or Excel format. Optional Task 1.0 Optional Tasks O1.1 Design Services for new Wet Well and Valve Vault If an alternative that includes the construction of a new wet well and valve vault is selected in the preliminary design phase, the following additional design sheets and associated design work will be required. Additional Sheets for new wet well and valve vault 1 C1 Site Piping Plan 2 C3 Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plan 3 C4 Influent Sewer Profile 4 C5 Piping Details 5 C6 Standard Details 6 M2A New wet well and Valve Vault Plan and Sections 7 S4 New wet well & Valve Vault Plans, Sections, and Details (Optional) Geotechnical Services · The depth of the scoped boring and associated geotechnical analysis will be expanded to include recommendations for the deeper excavations and design of the wet well and valve vault Scope of Work Assumptions 1. No record drawings or conformed drawings are included in the scope of work. 2. Project management, quality control and administration tasks are included in the Tasks above. 3. Fee estimate assumes that the 90% project design will be completed in 2022 and that the final bid documents and bidding will occur in 2023. 75 South Tahoe Public Utility DistrictBijou Pump Station Rehabilitation ProjectCost Proposal4/26/2022PICQA/QC LeadModeling LeadProject ManagerProject EngineerCAD DesignerAdmin SupportWSC Labor HoursWSC Labor FeeExpensesWSC Fee Labor Fee Labor Fee Labor Fee Labor Fee Total FeeScott DurenJeffery LawrenceJeroen Olthof Robert Natoli Kendall StahlBilling rates, $/hr$295 $295 $295 $260 $190 $160 $1401 Data Collection, Review and Analysis1.1 Preliminary Design Phase Meetings and Site Visits2 1224 2026014,450$ 600$ 15,050$ 3,300$ 18,350$ 1.2 Background Document Request and Review24 42122,670$ 100$ 2,770$ 2,770$ 1.3 Alternative Analysis 2 616 3246013,160$ 500$ 13,660$ 11,000$ 1,650$ 26,310$ 1.4 Alternative Analysis TM2 416 3286213,130$ 500$ 13,630$ 13,630$ 1.5 Dual Forcemain System Control Analysis and TM4 16 20 8 20 1280 19,600$ 800$ 20,400$ 6,600$ 27,000$ 1.6 CEQA Preliminary Design Phase2 2 2 410 2,460$ 100$ 2,560$ 25,791$ 28,351$ SUBTOTAL12 42 20 70 112 12 16 28465,470$ 2,600$ 68,070$ 20,900$ -$ 25,791$ 1,650$ 116,411$ 2Design2.1 Design Phase Meetings and Site Visits2 424 245412,570$ 500$ 13,070$ 5,500$ 18,570$ 2.2 Design Memorandum2 420 40 309619,370$ 800$ 20,170$ 20,170$ 2.3 65%, 90%, and Final Design 4 24110 230 260628122,160$ 4,900$ 127,060$ 106,700$ 3,850$ 237,610$ 2.4 ASCE 41 and ACI 350 Structural Analysis24 4102,390$ 100$ 2,490$ 48,400$ 50,890$ 2.5 TRPA and CEQA Final Design Phase2 46 1,280$ 100$ 1,380$ 11,770$ 12,819$ 25,969$ SUBTOTAL8 34 0 160 302 290 0 794 157,770$ 6,400$ 164,170$ 160,600$ 11,770$ 12,819$ 3,850$ 353,209$ 3Bidding Services3.1 Attend Prebid Conference661,560$ 100$ 1,660$ 1,660$ 3.2 Respond to Bidder Questions12 12245,400$ 200$ 5,600$ 6,600$ 12,200$ SUBTOTAL0 0 0 18 12 0 0 30 6,960$ 300$ 7,260$ 6,600$ -$ -$ -$ 13,860$ COLUMN TOTALS20 76 20 248 426 302 16 1108 230,200$ 9,300$ 239,500$ 188,100$ 11,770$ 38,610$ 5,500$ 483,480$ 111OT 1Optional TasksOT 1.1 Design Services for new Wet Well and Valve Vault2 832 72 9621040,310$ 1,600$ 41,910$ 16,390$ 8,250$ 66,550$ Optional Tasks TOTAL2 8 0 32 72 96 0 210 40,310$ 1,600$ 41,910$ 16,390$ 8,250$ -$ -$ 66,550$ OPTIONAL TASKS TOTAL2 8 0 32 72 96 0 21040,310$ 1,600$ 41,910$ 16,390$ 8,250$ -$ -$ 66,550$ JDHALL FIRMSRates are subject to revision as of January 1 each year.Standard mileage rate $0.57 per mile (or current Federal Mileage Reimbursement Rate)10% mark-up for sub-contracted services and direct expenes Task No. Task DescriptionWSCGeoAssociatCardnoTJCAA76 IDTask ModeTask NameDuration StartFinishPredecessors1Notice to Proceed0 daysThu 5/12/22Thu 5/12/222Data Collection, Review and Analysis65 daysThu 5/12/22Wed 8/10/223Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit Inspections of Pump Station0 daysThu 5/12/22Thu 5/12/2214Background Document Request5 daysThu 5/12/22Wed 5/18/2215Kickoff Follow Up Meeting - Select Criteria and Alts to Analyze0 daysWed 5/18/22Wed 5/18/223FS+5 days6Review Existing Information5 daysThu 5/19/22Wed 5/25/2247Analyze Selected Project Alternatives20 daysThu 6/9/22Wed 7/6/228SS+10 days8Hydraulic Analysis, Scenario Modeling, Pump Selection30 daysThu 5/26/22Wed 7/6/2269Develop Draft Alternatives Analysis TM15 daysThu 6/23/22Wed 7/13/227SS+10 days10Submit Draft Alternatives Analysis TM0 daysWed 7/13/22Wed 7/13/22911District Review - Confirm Project Direction10 daysThu 7/14/22Wed 7/27/221012Alternative Confirmed for Design0 daysWed 7/27/22Wed 7/27/221113Finalize Alternatives Analysis TM10 daysThu 7/28/22Wed 8/10/221114Design165 daysWed 7/27/22Wed 3/15/2315Controls and Instrumentation Workshop0 daysWed 7/27/22Wed 7/27/221216Draft BOD TM & 30% Drawings15 daysThu 7/28/22Wed 8/17/221117District Review 10 daysThu 8/18/22Wed 8/31/221618Finalize BOD TM10 daysThu 9/1/22Wed 9/14/22171965% Design30 daysThu 9/1/22Wed 10/12/221720Submit 65% Design0 daysWed 10/12/22Wed 10/12/221921District Review10 daysThu 10/13/22Wed 10/26/22192265% Review Workshop0 daysWed 10/26/22Wed 10/26/22212390% Design 30 daysThu 10/27/22Wed 12/7/222224Submit 90% Design0 daysWed 12/7/22Wed 12/7/222325District Review10 daysThu 12/8/22Wed 12/21/22232690% Review Workshop0 daysWed 12/21/22Wed 12/21/222527Final Contract Documents25 daysThu 2/9/23Wed 3/15/2326,41FF+10 days28Submit Final Contract Documents0 daysWed 3/15/23Wed 3/15/232729Permitting Assistance553 daysMon 1/18/21Wed 3/1/235/125/125/187/137/277/2710/1210/2612/712/213/15MJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAHalf 2, 2022Half 1, 2023Half 2, 2023Half 1, 2024Half 2, 2024TaskSplitMilestoneSummaryProject SummaryInactive TaskInactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual TaskDuration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual SummaryStart-onlyFinish-onlyExternal TasksExternal MilestoneDeadlineCriticalCritical SplitProgressManual ProgressPage 1Project: Bijou PS Rehabiliation ProjectDate: Tue 4/5/2277 IDTask ModeTask NameDuration StartFinishPredecessors30CEQA438 daysMon 1/18/21Wed 9/21/2231CEQA Field and Desktop Investigations20 daysThu 5/12/22Wed 6/8/22332Draft Environmental Reports to District20 daysThu 6/9/22Wed 7/6/223133County Review of Env. Reports10 daysThu 7/7/22Wed 7/20/223234Finalize Enviromental Reports5 daysThu 7/21/22Wed 7/27/223335Develop and Review CEQA Exemption for Project2 monsThu 7/28/22Wed 9/21/2233,1236Finalize CEQA Excemption for Project10 daysMon 1/18/21Fri 1/29/2137TRPA120 daysWed 9/14/22Wed 3/1/231838Submit Initial TRPA Checklist0 daysWed 9/14/22Wed 9/14/221839Submit 90% plans for TRPA Review with updated Checklist0 daysWed 12/7/22Wed 12/7/222440TRPA review period60 daysThu 12/8/22Wed 3/1/233941TRPA Project approval0 daysWed 3/1/23Wed 3/1/234042Bidding Services50 daysThu 3/16/23Wed 5/24/23143County Prepare to Advertise15 daysThu 3/16/23Wed 4/5/232844Board Approval0 daysWed 4/5/23Wed 4/5/234345Respond to Bidder RFIs/Bidding Period25 daysThu 4/6/23Wed 5/10/234446Pre Bid Conference5 daysMon 4/17/23Fri 4/21/2343FS+7 days47Bid Opening0 daysWed 5/10/23Wed 5/10/234548Escrow Bid Doc Review10 daysThu 5/11/23Wed 5/24/2345,4649Issuance of Intent to Award0 daysWed 5/24/23Wed 5/24/234850Construction287 daysThu 5/25/23Fri 6/28/2451Award Contract30 daysThu 5/25/23Wed 7/5/234952Conformed Documents20 daysThu 5/25/23Wed 6/21/234953Notice to Proceed0 daysWed 7/5/23Wed 7/5/235154Float for May 1, 2024 Contractor Mobilization32 daysThu 7/6/23Fri 8/18/235355Submittals 40 daysMon 8/21/23Fri 10/13/235456Procure Pumps and Equipment6 monsMon 10/16/23Fri 3/29/245557Constructor Mobilization3 monsMon 4/1/24Fri 6/21/245658Record Drawings5 daysMon 6/24/24Fri 6/28/24579/1412/73/14/55/105/247/5MJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAHalf 2, 2022Half 1, 2023Half 2, 2023Half 1, 2024Half 2, 2024TaskSplitMilestoneSummaryProject SummaryInactive TaskInactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual TaskDuration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual SummaryStart-onlyFinish-onlyExternal TasksExternal MilestoneDeadlineCriticalCritical SplitProgressManual ProgressPage 2Project: Bijou PS Rehabiliation ProjectDate: Tue 4/5/2278 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6b TO: Board of Directors FROM: Paul Hughes, Chief Financial Officer MEETING DATE: May 5, 2022 ITEM – PROJECT NAME: Setting Water and Sewer Capacity Charges REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 581-22, an Ordinance of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, Setting Water Capacity Charges and Sewer Connection Fees and Amending Administrative Code Sections 3.1.49(a), 3.1.49(c), 3.1.49(e), 4.5.7 and Associated Appendix Fee Schedules. DISCUSSION: At the April 21, 2022, Regular Board meeting, the District’s rate consultant, Shawn Koorn with HDR Engineering, presented the final draft versions of the water and sewer capacity charge studies. Ordinance No. 581-22 adopts the charges and fees as determined in the studies. The recommended sewer connection fees are developed to be applied to residential developments based on square footage of the living units. For example, the recommended sewer capacity charge for a typical single-family residence (2,736 square feet) is $11,324, or $4.14/square foot. Based on this fee structure, a 750 square foot living unit would be charged $3,105 for sewer connection fees, compared to the current rate of $8,235. This type of fee structure is beneficial to workforce/low-income multi-family housing developments. For residential remodels or additions, it is recommended that fees be charged for additional sewer capacity when the structure square footage is increased by more than 500 square feet. Ordinance No. 581-22 includes this language. This language can be adjusted in the future if necessary. The recommended commercial sewer connection fees are based on the number of applicable plumbing fixture units or number of seats (for restaurants). This is the same methodology used today except that there is currently a minimum charge applied. The recommended charge per fixture unit is $755. This fee structure is beneficial to commercial developments with a low number of fixture units, such as office space which currently has a minimum charge of $8,235. Under the recommended new fees, a commercial building with five fixture units would be charged $3,775 compared to $8,235 today. General Manager John Thiel Directors Chris Cefalu Shane Romsos David Peterson Kelly Sheehan Nick Exline 79 Paul Hughes Page 2 May 5, 2022 The recommended water capacity charges are strictly based on water meter size, and the capacity associated with the meter size. The charts below illustrate the recommended water capacity charge by meter size: Water Capacity Charge ¾ inch capacity charge $11,015 1 inch capacity charge $18,359 1-1/2 inch capacity charge $36,718 2 inch capacity charge $58,749 3 inch capacity charge $117,535 4 inch capacity charge $183,591 6 inch capacity charge $367,183 8 inch capacity charge $587,490 10 inch capacity charge $844,517 12 inch capacity charge $1,239,238 16 inch capacity change $1,652,317 Private Fire Protection 1 inch capacity charge $49 1-1/2 inch capacity charge $142 2 inch capacity charge $303 3 inch capacity charge $881 4 inch capacity charge $1,878 6 inch capacity charge $5,456 8 inch capacity charge $11,627 10 inch capacity charge $20,910 As illustrated above, the recommended charge for a typical residential connection, ¾ inch, is $11,015, an increase of $4,182 compared to the current charge. This increase is not unexpected since the last water capacity charge study was completed 16 years ago in 2006. District staff recommend Board adoption of Ordinance No. 581-22. SCHEDULE: New capacity charges effective 30 days from the date of adoption of Ordinance No. 581-22 COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT AVAILABLE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 581-22 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: CATEGORY: Sewer/Water GENERAL MANAGER: YES NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES NO 80 ORDINANCE NO. 581-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT SETTING WATER CAPACITY CHARGES AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES AND AMENDING ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTIONS 3.1.49(a), 3.1.49(c), 3.1.49(e), 4.5.7 AND ASSOCIATED APPENDIX FEE SCHEDULES Be it enacted by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, County of El Dorado, State of California, as follows: SECTION I - POLICY AND PURPOSE The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Administrative Code to increase water capacity charges and sewer connection fees. SECTION II – DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Ordinance, the terms used herein are defined as follows: A. The District – The South Tahoe Public Utility District. B. The Board – The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District. C. Administrative Code – The compilation and codification of all of the Administrative, Water, Sewer, Street Lighting and Groundwater Management Plan Ordinances of the District, which establish the authority and the principles for the decisions of the District, and provide the public with guidelines applicable to District operations. SECTION III – FINDINGS The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, El Dorado County, State of California, makes the following findings: 1. The District’s water capacity charges and sewer connection fees were previously determined to be less than the cost of providing such capacity, so the District increased the water capacity charges and sewer connection fees in order to reflect the actual cost of providing the services for which such charges and fees are imposed. 2. The Board later postponed the scheduled increases several times on the basis that allowing the scheduled water capacity charges and sewer connection fees increases would contribute to adversely impact development within the District’s boundaries by increasing the costs of new development. 81 3. The current economic climate has improved significantly and is no longer adversely impacting new development within the District’s boundaries. 4. The District completed a study which found that the current water capacity charges and sewer connection fees were less than the cost of providing the services for which such charges and fees are imposed. 5. The District needs to increase the water capacity charges and sewer connection fees in order to reflect the actual cost of providing the services for which the charges are imposed 6. The Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the health and safety of District’s customers to increase the District’s current water capacity charges and sewer connection fees as provided in this ordinance. SECTION IV – WATER CAPACITY CHARGE APPENDIX Administrative Code Appendix Fee Schedule, Sections 3.1.49(a), (c) and (e) shall be amended in their entirety as follows: 3.1.49(a) Water Capacity Charge ¾ inch capacity charge $11,015.00 1 inch capacity charge $18,359.00 1-1/2 inch capacity charge $36,718.00 2 inch capacity charge $58,749.00 3 inch capacity charge $117,535.00 4 inch capacity charge $183,591.00 6 inch capacity charge $367,183.00 8 inch capacity charge $587,490.00 10 inch capacity charge $844,517.00 12 inch capacity charge $1,239,238.00 16 inch capacity change $1,652,317.00 3.1.49(c) Private Fire Protection 1 inch capacity charge $49.00 1-1/2 inch capacity charge $142.00 2 inch capacity charge $303.00 3 inch capacity charge $881.00 4 inch capacity charge $1,878.00 6 inch capacity charge $5,456.00 8 inch capacity charge $11,627.00 10 inch capacity charge $20,910.00 3.1.49(e) Period Adjustments: The capacity charges in sections 3.1.49(a) and (c) shall automatically be adjusted on July 1st of each year by a percentage equal to the change in construction costs since the prior fiscal year based upon Engineering News Record (or similar publication) construction cost index. 82 SECTION V – SEWER CONNECTION FEES Administrative Code Section 4.5.7 is amended in its entirety as follows: 4.5.7 - A fee will be collected to connect to the collection system as defined in the Appendix Fee Schedule for section 4.5.7. Administrative Code Section 4.5.10 is amended in its entirety as follows: 4.5.10 Periodic Adjustment. The sewer connection fees in Administrative Code Appendix section 4.5.7 shall automatically be adjusted on July 1st of each year by a percentage equal to the change in construction costs since the prior fiscal year based upon Engineering News Record (or similar publication) construction cost index. SECTION VI – SEWER CONNECTION FEES APPENDIX Administrative Code Appendix Fee Schedule, Sections 4.5.7 shall be amended in its entirety as follows: 4.5.7 Residential Connection Fee $4.14 per square foot Residential Addition $4.14 per square foot in excess of 500 Commercial Connection Fee $755.00 per plumbing fixture unit Restaurant Connection Fee $944.00 per indoor seat 1 – 20 $189.00 per indoor seat 21 and over $000.00 per outdoor seat 1 – 20 $283.00 per outdoor seat 21 and over SECTION VII – SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance and its implementing rules and regulations is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or the Administrative Code. The Board of Directors declares and determines that it would have passed section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof of this Ordinance and its implementing rules and regulations and the Administrative Code irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be determined to be unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION VIII – EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance amending the above referenced section of the Administrative Code shall take effect thirty days after its passage. 83 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District at its duly held regular meeting on the 5th day of May, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ___________________________________ Kelly Sheehan, President South Tahoe Public Utility District ATTEST: ___________________________________ Melonie Guttry, Clerk of the Board South Tahoe Public Utility District 84 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Payroll 4/19/22 534,468.81 Total Payroll 534,468.81 ADP & Insight eTools 0.00 AFLAC/WageWorks claims and fees 0.00 Cal Bank & Trust fiscal agent fees 0.00 Prominence - health care payments 4,580.37 Ameritas - Insurance Payments 0.00 Total Vendor EFT 4,580.37 Accounts Payable Checks-Sewer Fund 1,111,110.11 Accounts Payable Checks-Water Fund 617,010.18 Total Accounts Payable Checks 1,728,120.29 Utility Management Refunds 0.00 Total Utility Management Checks 0.00 Grand Total 2,267,169.47 Payroll EFTs & Checks 4/19/2022 EFT CA Employment Taxes & W/H 23,361.31 EFT Federal Employment Taxes & W/H 115,673.35 EFT CalPERS Contributions 81,365.87 EFT Empower Retirement-Deferred Comp 26,647.23 EFT Stationary Engineers Union Dues 2,819.70 EFT CDHP Health Savings (HSA)5,158.69 EFT Retirement Health Savings 0.00 EFT United Way Contributions 21.00 EFT Employee Direct Deposits 279,030.28 CHK Employee Garnishments 391.38 CHK Employee Paychecks 0.00 Total 534,468.81 FOR APPROVAL May 5, 2022 85 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 42363 - A-1 CHEMICAL INC 7138310 Janitorial Supplies Inventory Paid by Check #109120 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 542.23 Vendor 42363 - A-1 CHEMICAL INC Totals Invoices 1 $542.23 Vendor 43721 - ACWA/JPIA 0684720 ACWA Medical/Vision Insurance Paid by Check #109121 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 221,019.58 Vendor 43721 - ACWA/JPIA Totals Invoices 1 $221,019.58 Vendor 48790 - ADS LLC INV-SFW4978 Sewer Flow Meter Inventory Paid by Check #109122 12/22/2021 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,341.78 Vendor 48790 - ADS LLC Totals Invoices 1 $4,341.78 Vendor 48136 - AHERN RENTALS 24790398-001 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109123 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 9.46 Vendor 48136 - AHERN RENTALS Totals Invoices 1 $9.46 Vendor 49581 - ALERT MEDIA INC INV1754 Service Contracts Paid by Check #109124 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,902.00 Vendor 49581 - ALERT MEDIA INC Totals Invoices 1 $4,902.00 Vendor 48684 - ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 9016084926 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109125 04/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 354.61 Vendor 48684 - ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC Totals Invoices 1 $354.61 Vendor 43949 - ALPEN SIERRA COFFEE 223649 Office Supply Issues Paid by Check #109126 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 101.50 223650 Office Supply Issues Paid by Check #109126 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 53.75 223781 Office Supply Issues Paid by Check #109126 04/19/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 101.50 223782 Office Supply Issues Paid by Check #109126 04/19/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 53.75 Vendor 43949 - ALPEN SIERRA COFFEE Totals Invoices 4 $310.50 Vendor 48817 - MARY ALSBURY MA051522 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109127 05/15/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 264.00 Vendor 48817 - MARY ALSBURY Totals Invoices 1 $264.00 Vendor 49337 - AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC. 1X36-PMJY-FPGY Automotive Paid by Check #109128 10/07/2021 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 75.48 16V9-6476-FCCR Pump Stations Paid by Check #109128 04/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 361.08 1RW4-T193-1K7J Office Supplies Paid by Check #109128 04/06/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 38.04 1MRM-D36K-DXGP Safety Equipment - Physicals Paid by Check #109128 04/07/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 180.58 Vendor 49337 - AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC. Totals Invoices 4 $655.18 Vendor 44768 - ANGIE'S SIGNS 6386 Tahoe Keys Sewer PS Rehab Paid by Check #109129 04/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 850.00 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 1 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 86 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 44768 - ANGIE'S SIGNS Totals Invoices 1 $850.00 Vendor 45202 - AT&T MOBILITY 04102022 Telephone Paid by Check #109130 04/10/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,506.54 Vendor 45202 - AT&T MOBILITY Totals Invoices 1 $2,506.54 Vendor 48000 - AT&T/CALNET 3 APRIL 2022 - 2 Telephone Paid by Check #109131 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,064.76 Vendor 48000 - AT&T/CALNET 3 Totals Invoices 1 $1,064.76 Vendor 48974 - FRANCISCO AVINA Boots0422 Safety Equipment - Physicals Paid by Check #109132 04/07/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 176.70 Vendor 48974 - FRANCISCO AVINA Totals Invoices 1 $176.70 Vendor 11551 - AXELSON IRON SHOP 290732 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109133 04/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 491.85 Vendor 11551 - AXELSON IRON SHOP Totals Invoices 1 $491.85 Vendor 45009 - BENTLY AGROWDYNAMICS 208326 Biosolids Disposal Costs Paid by Check #109134 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,178.25 Vendor 45009 - BENTLY AGROWDYNAMICS Totals Invoices 1 $1,178.25 Vendor 48955 - IVO BERGSOHN IB050322 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109135 05/03/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 74.00 Vendor 48955 - IVO BERGSOHN Totals Invoices 1 $74.00 Vendor 43828 - BLUE RIBBON TEMP PERSONNEL 13261 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109136 04/15/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 773.22 13317 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109136 04/22/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 736.40 Vendor 43828 - BLUE RIBBON TEMP PERSONNEL Totals Invoices 2 $1,509.62 Vendor 42978 - BROWNSTEIN HYATT 886601 Legal Services March 2022 Paid by EFT #56 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 75,119.75 Vendor 42978 - BROWNSTEIN HYATT Totals Invoices 1 $75,119.75 Vendor 22251 - CALIF DEPT OF WATER RESOURCES 1800149030 Regulatory Operating Permits Paid by Check #109137 03/16/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 53,530.00 Vendor 22251 - CALIF DEPT OF WATER RESOURCES Totals Invoices 1 $53,530.00 Vendor 49220 - CAMPORA PROPANE 713033 Propane Paid by Check #109138 04/07/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 545.61 Vendor 49220 - CAMPORA PROPANE Totals Invoices 1 $545.61 Vendor 13230 - CAROLLO ENGINEERS FB21426 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109139 04/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 42,198.50 FB22329 Secondary Clarifier #3 Rehab Paid by Check #109139 04/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 7,178.58 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 2 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 87 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 13230 - CAROLLO ENGINEERS Totals Invoices 2 $49,377.08 Vendor 40176 - CASHMAN EQUIPMENT INWO1477959 Automotive Paid by Check #109140 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 26,853.87 Vendor 40176 - CASHMAN EQUIPMENT Totals Invoices 1 $26,853.87 Vendor 42328 - CDW-G CORP V769600 District Computer Supplies Paid by Check #109141 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 3,398.99 W051875 District Computer Supplies Paid by Check #109141 04/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 168.56 W086269 Computer Purchases Paid by Check #109141 04/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 845.32 Vendor 42328 - CDW-G CORP Totals Invoices 3 $4,412.87 Vendor 40343 - CHEMSEARCH INC 7726516 Service Contracts Paid by Check #109142 03/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 377.23 Vendor 40343 - CHEMSEARCH INC Totals Invoices 1 $377.23 Vendor 48654 - D&H BROADCASTING LLC Mar 22 Stmt Public Relations Expense Paid by Check #109143 04/10/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,120.00 Vendor 48654 - D&H BROADCASTING LLC Totals Invoices 1 $1,120.00 Vendor 49746 - GREGORY DUPREE GD051522 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109144 05/15/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 264.00 Vendor 49746 - GREGORY DUPREE Totals Invoices 1 $264.00 Vendor 49692 - EATON CORPORATION 59282056 Luther Pass Pump Station Paid by Check #109145 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 6,883.00 Vendor 49692 - EATON CORPORATION Totals Invoices 1 $6,883.00 Vendor 47898 - ETS 8936 Monitoring Paid by Check #109146 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,330.50 Vendor 47898 - ETS Totals Invoices 1 $1,330.50 Vendor 18550 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC L0625923 Monitoring Paid by Check #109147 04/13/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 35.00 L0626894 Monitoring Paid by Check #109147 04/21/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 35.00 L0627206 Monitoring Paid by Check #109147 04/25/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 40.00 Vendor 18550 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL LLC Totals Invoices 3 $110.00 Vendor 47960 - FARR WEST ENGINEERING INC 17021 Keller Heavenly Water System Improvement Paid by Check #109148 01/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 81.25 17027 Consulting Paid by Check #109148 01/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 38,956.25 17215 Consulting Paid by Check #109148 03/04/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 11,980.53 Vendor 47960 - FARR WEST ENGINEERING INC Totals Invoices 3 $51,018.03 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 3 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 88 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 14890 - FEDEX 7-725-48992 Postage Expenses Paid by Check #109149 04/15/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 86.20 7-733-22975 Postage Expense Paid by Check #109149 04/22/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 57.25 Vendor 14890 - FEDEX Totals Invoices 2 $143.45 Vendor 48402 - FLYERS ENERGY LLC 22-506793 Gasoline & Diesel Fuel Inventory Paid by Check #109150 04/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 7,023.75 22-510862 Gasoline & Diesel Fuel Expense Paid by Check #109150 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,824.52 22-511846 Fuel Paid by Check #109150 04/22/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,671.90 Vendor 48402 - FLYERS ENERGY LLC Totals Invoices 3 $12,520.17 Vendor 49119 - GANNETT FLEMING INC 1 Tahoe Keys Sewer PS Rehab Paid by Check #109151 03/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,202.50 2 Tahoe Keys Sewer PS Rehab Paid by Check #109151 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,620.00 Vendor 49119 - GANNETT FLEMING INC Totals Invoices 2 $5,822.50 Vendor 44448 - GFOA 300167679 Subscription Expense Paid by Check #109152 03/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 65.00 Vendor 44448 - GFOA Totals Invoices 1 $65.00 Vendor 43111 - GFS CHEMICALS INC CINV-093373 Laboratory Supplies Paid by Check #109153 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 806.88 CINV-094423 Laboratory Supplies Paid by Check #109153 04/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 59.30 Vendor 43111 - GFS CHEMICALS INC Totals Invoices 2 $866.18 Vendor 15600 - GRAINGER 9270137442 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109154 04/06/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,078.91 9270701379 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109154 04/06/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,078.91 9275097898 Confined Space Rescue Trailer/Equipment Paid by Check #109154 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,262.51 9275675842 Automotive Paid by Check #109154 04/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 117.51 Vendor 15600 - GRAINGER Totals Invoices 4 $4,537.84 Vendor 49613 - H2O MANAGEMENT 1 Valve Exerciser & Data Collector Unit Paid by Check #109155 02/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 29,606.17 Vendor 49613 - H2O MANAGEMENT Totals Invoices 1 $29,606.17 Vendor 15800 - HACH CO 12994899 Primary Equipment Paid by Check #109156 04/21/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 341.73 Vendor 15800 - HACH CO Totals Invoices 1 $341.73 Vendor 44430 - HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 123627 Service Contracts Paid by Check #109157 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,212.28 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 4 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 89 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 44430 - HIGH SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS Totals Invoices 1 $1,212.28 Vendor 43208 - IN-SITU INC 00151399 Laboratory Supplies Paid by Check #109158 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 179.27 Vendor 43208 - IN-SITU INC Totals Invoices 1 $179.27 Vendor 48140 - INTEGRITY LOCKSMITH i34077 Safety Equipment - Physicals Paid by Check #109159 04/08/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 65.21 Vendor 48140 - INTEGRITY LOCKSMITH Totals Invoices 1 $65.21 Vendor 44110 - J&L PRO KLEEN INC 29133 Janitorial Services Paid by Check #109160 04/16/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,666.20 Vendor 44110 - J&L PRO KLEEN INC Totals Invoices 1 $4,666.20 Vendor 48374 - JACK DOHENY SUPPLIES INC 157380 Infiltration & Inflow Paid by Check #109161 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 3,002.89 Vendor 48374 - JACK DOHENY SUPPLIES INC Totals Invoices 1 $3,002.89 Vendor 49725 - LAKESIDE TERMITE & PEST CONTROL 013771360 Buildings Paid by Check #109162 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 150.00 Vendor 49725 - LAKESIDE TERMITE & PEST CONTROL Totals Invoices 1 $150.00 Vendor 49591 - JUDY LEONG May 22 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109163 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 20.00 Vendor 49591 - JUDY LEONG Totals Invoices 1 $20.00 Vendor 45135 - LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 66100410724 Automotive Paid by Check #109164 04/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 888.33 Vendor 45135 - LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Totals Invoices 1 $888.33 Vendor 22550 - LIBERTY UTILITIES APRIL 2022 - 2 Electricity Paid by Check #109165 04/25/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 220,839.32 Vendor 22550 - LIBERTY UTILITIES Totals Invoices 1 $220,839.32 Vendor 47903 - LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT INC 66774612 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109166 10/22/2021 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 424.03 67257855 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109166 11/20/2021 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 27.01 67959972 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109166 12/23/2021 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 139.37 69010066 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109166 02/22/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 178.53 69805850 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109166 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 224.45 70186709 Shop Supplies Paid by Check #109166 04/22/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 409.60 Vendor 47903 - LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT INC Totals Invoices 6 $1,402.99 Vendor 49704 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 106363 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109167 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,636.36 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 5 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 90 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 49704 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION Totals Invoices 1 $2,636.36 Vendor 48725 - MARTECH INC 9181 Luther Pass Pump Station Paid by Check #109168 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 3,772.50 Vendor 48725 - MARTECH INC Totals Invoices 1 $3,772.50 Vendor 49076 - BUCK McLELLAND Mileage0422 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109169 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 29.25 Vendor 49076 - BUCK McLELLAND Totals Invoices 1 $29.25 Vendor 43889 - MME MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 0168725-IN Automotive Paid by Check #109170 03/24/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,813.61 0168954-IN Automotive Paid by Check #109170 04/06/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 729.77 Vendor 43889 - MME MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE Totals Invoices 2 $3,543.38 Vendor 48463 - NEVADA SEAL & PUMP NSP4814 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109171 03/11/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,512.27 Vendor 48463 - NEVADA SEAL & PUMP Totals Invoices 1 $4,512.27 Vendor 41030 - OFFICE DEPOT 237510722001 Office Supplies Paid by Check #109172 04/07/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 85.76 Vendor 41030 - OFFICE DEPOT Totals Invoices 1 $85.76 Vendor 44607 - OLIN CORPORATION 3000092165 Hypochlorite Paid by Check #109173 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,588.38 3000095991 Hypochlorite Paid by Check #109173 04/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,350.94 Vendor 44607 - OLIN CORPORATION Totals Invoices 2 $8,939.32 Vendor 41272 - PAC MACHINE CO 86171 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109174 03/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 746.88 Vendor 41272 - PAC MACHINE CO Totals Invoices 1 $746.88 Vendor 48443 - QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES INC 66945 Service Contracts Paid by Check #109175 04/08/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,105.00 Vendor 48443 - QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES INC Totals Invoices 1 $1,105.00 Vendor 49497 - REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE LLC STPUD422 Advisory Paid by Check #109176 04/09/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 5,731.48 Vendor 49497 - REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE LLC Totals Invoices 1 $5,731.48 Vendor 48144 - RELIANCE STANDARD APRIL22A LTD/Life Insurance Management Paid by Check #109177 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,331.30 APRIL22B LTD/Life Insurance Union/Board Payable Paid by Check #109177 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 3,330.28 Vendor 48144 - RELIANCE STANDARD Totals Invoices 2 $5,661.58 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 6 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 91 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 49015 - ANTONY SCHINZING SCRCBD10422 Dues - Memberships - Certification Paid by Check #109178 02/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 70.00 Vendor 49015 - ANTONY SCHINZING Totals Invoices 1 $70.00 Vendor 49140 - SIERRA BUSINESS COUNCIL Mar 2022 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109179 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,000.00 Vendor 49140 - SIERRA BUSINESS COUNCIL Totals Invoices 1 $1,000.00 Vendor 48622 - SIERRA ECOTONE SOLUTIONS 1104 Waterline Replacements Paid by Check #109180 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,000.00 Vendor 48622 - SIERRA ECOTONE SOLUTIONS Totals Invoices 1 $2,000.00 Vendor 22620 - SIERRA SPRINGS 5152426 040922 Supplies Paid by Check #109181 04/09/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 102.46 Vendor 22620 - SIERRA SPRINGS Totals Invoices 1 $102.46 Vendor 48735 - SILVER STATE ANALYTICAL LAB RN283068 Monitoring Paid by Check #109182 04/13/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 258.00 Vendor 48735 - SILVER STATE ANALYTICAL LAB Totals Invoices 1 $258.00 Vendor 49762 - GARY SILVESTRI 2606702 Water Use Reduction Rebates Paid by Check #109183 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 171.60 Vendor 49762 - GARY SILVESTRI Totals Invoices 1 $171.60 Vendor 48944 - CHRIS SKELLY CS051522 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109184 05/15/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 264.00 Vendor 48944 - CHRIS SKELLY Totals Invoices 1 $264.00 Vendor 49132 - SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT APRIL 2022 Water and Other Utilities Paid by Check #109185 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 5,375.05 Vendor 49132 - SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Totals Invoices 1 $5,375.05 Vendor 45168 - SOUTHWEST GAS APRIL 2022 Natural Gas Paid by Check #109186 04/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 814.48 Vendor 45168 - SOUTHWEST GAS Totals Invoices 1 $814.48 Vendor 48481 - SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE SW-0239044 Regulatory Operating Permits Paid by Check #109187 04/06/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,738.00 Vendor 48481 - SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE Totals Invoices 1 $1,738.00 Vendor 47798 - T&S CONSTRUCTION CO INC 22-02A Tahoe Keys Sewer PS Rehab Paid by Check #109188 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 78,000.00 22-02AR Tahoe Keys Sewer PS Rehab Paid by Check #109188 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 (7,800.00) Vendor 47798 - T&S CONSTRUCTION CO INC Totals Invoices 2 $70,200.00 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 7 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 92 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 42489 - TAHOE MOUNTAIN NEWS Apr 22 Stmt Public Relations Expense Paid by Check #109189 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 170.00 Vendor 42489 - TAHOE MOUNTAIN NEWS Totals Invoices 1 $170.00 Vendor 49420 - THATCHER COMPANY OF NEVADA INC 2022400104122 Hypochlorite Paid by Check #109190 04/04/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,451.51 Vendor 49420 - THATCHER COMPANY OF NEVADA INC Totals Invoices 1 $4,451.51 Vendor 48877 - SHELLY THOMSEN ST041922 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109191 04/19/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 118.17 ST042022 Travel - Meetings - Education Paid by Check #109191 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 57.00 Vendor 48877 - SHELLY THOMSEN Totals Invoices 2 $175.17 Vendor 47839 - TRI SIGNAL INTEGRATION INC 107597 Buildings Paid by Check #109192 03/21/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,050.00 C148241 Buildings Paid by Check #109192 04/01/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 350.00 Vendor 47839 - TRI SIGNAL INTEGRATION INC Totals Invoices 2 $1,400.00 Vendor 48747 - TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-374064 Service Contracts Paid by Check #109193 05/01/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022 05/05/2022 35,915.73 Vendor 48747 - TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC Totals Invoices 1 $35,915.73 Vendor 44519 - UNITED RENTALS INC 204295905-001 Pipe - Covers & Manholes Paid by Check #109194 03/18/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,234.58 Vendor 44519 - UNITED RENTALS INC Totals Invoices 1 $1,234.58 Vendor 43718 - USA BLUE BOOK 924883 Laboratory Supplies Paid by Check #109195 03/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 121.54 924884 Laboratory Supplies Paid by Check #109195 03/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 121.54 Vendor 43718 - USA BLUE BOOK Totals Invoices 2 $243.08 Vendor 45243 - VELOCITY VEHICLE GROUP RA261023563:01 Replace Engine/Transmission Paid by Check #109196 04/08/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 5,336.19 Vendor 45243 - VELOCITY VEHICLE GROUP Totals Invoices 1 $5,336.19 Vendor 49296 - VERIZON WIRELESS 9903771174 Telephone Paid by Check #109197 04/09/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 724.66 Vendor 49296 - VERIZON WIRELESS Totals Invoices 1 $724.66 Vendor 48586 - VINCIGUERRA CONSTRUCTION INC 21-10A Secondary Clarifier #1 Rehab Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 92,963.00 21-10Aa Secondary Clarifier #2 Rehab Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 92,963.00 21-10Ab Generator, Emergency Blower Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 104,121.25 21-10AR Secondary Clarifier #1 Rehab Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 (1,360.45) Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 8 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 93 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 21-10ARa Secondary Clarifier #2 Rehab Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 (360.45) 21-10ARb Generator, Emergency Blower Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 37,894.69 21-10ARc Tanks Backup Power Project Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,675.00 22-01A Waterline, Bowers Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 223,169.15 22-01Aa Bijou #2 & #3 Waterline Replacement Paid by Check #109199 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 164,946.10 22-01AR Waterline, Bowers Paid by Check #109198 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 (11,158.46) 22-01ARa Bijou #2 & #3 Waterline Replacement Paid by Check #109199 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 (8,247.31) Vendor 48586 - VINCIGUERRA CONSTRUCTION INC Totals Invoices 11 $697,605.52 Vendor 49540 - WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 6551 Contractual Services Paid by Check #109200 02/28/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 13,134.33 6592 Consulting Paid by Check #109200 03/31/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 5,565.00 Vendor 49540 - WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC Totals Invoices 2 $18,699.33 Vendor 48405 - WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 80843191 Janitorial Supplies Inventory Paid by Check #109201 04/22/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 466.18 Vendor 48405 - WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY Totals Invoices 1 $466.18 Vendor 25700 - WEDCO INC 754787 Small Tools Paid by Check #109202 04/13/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 101.68 754788 Primary Equipment Paid by Check #109202 04/13/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 60.30 755526 Engineering Offices Remodel Paid by Check #109202 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 30.62 755527 Engineering Offices Remodel Paid by Check #109202 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 32.04 755528 Buildings Paid by Check #109202 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 47.79 755529 Engineering Offices Remodel Paid by Check #109202 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 190.69 755530 Buildings Paid by Check #109202 04/20/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 70.87 Vendor 25700 - WEDCO INC Totals Invoices 7 $533.99 Vendor 25850 - WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY 19209928 Pipe - Covers & Manholes Paid by Check #109203 03/29/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 6,732.50 19211935 Pipe - Covers & Manholes Paid by Check #109203 03/30/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 374.10 19042644 Meters & Parts Inventory Paid by Check #109203 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 2,707.53 18867998-2 Saddles & Fittings Inventory Paid by Check #109203 04/13/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,123.41 18915814-3 Saddles & Fittings Inventory Paid by Check #109203 04/14/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,664.31 19213006 Pipe - Covers & Manholes Paid by Check #109203 04/19/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 4,247.25 Vendor 25850 - WESTERN NEVADA SUPPLY Totals Invoices 6 $16,849.10 Vendor 47959 - XYLEM WATER SOLUTIONS USA INC 3556C19271 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109204 04/12/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 221.97 3556C20123 Pump Stations Paid by Check #109204 04/19/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 1,473.65 Vendor 47959 - XYLEM WATER SOLUTIONS USA INC Totals Invoices 2 $1,695.62 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 9 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing 94 Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 49676 - ZIM INDUSTRIES INC 22-02A Paloma Well Rehabilitation 2021 Paid by Check #109205 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 28,565.00 22-02AR Paloma Well Rehabilitation 2021 Paid by Check #109205 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 04/30/2022 05/05/2022 (2,856.50) Vendor 49676 - ZIM INDUSTRIES INC Totals Invoices 2 $25,708.50 Grand Totals Invoices 144 $1,727,489.06 Run by Erika Franco on 04/28/2022 07:53:35 AM Page 10 of 10 Payment of Claims Payment Date Range 05/05/22 - 05/05/22 Report By Vendor - Invoice Summary Listing CWEA Chk #109116 $192.00 Sherwin-Williams Chk #109117 $439.23 ________________________________________________ 05/05/22 P.O.C. Total $1,728,120.29 95