Loading...
CarolloTechnicalProposal-STPUDSecondaryClarifierRehab071619      100 West Liberty Street, Suite 740, Reno, Nevada 89501   P. 775.324.4427  ͯͬͬ.ʹͰ.STPͬͬͰ | STPUDCoverLetterͬͳͭͲͭ͵.docx July 16, 2019 Mr. Stephen Caswell, P.E. South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services for Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation Dear Mr. Caswell: The Secondary Clarifiers are a critical link in the District’s activated sludge process. The three clarifiers, at around 50 years old, are running up against their remaining useful lives. Improvements are needed to extend the service lives of the clarifiers, reduce future maintenance costs, and improve process reliability. Project challenges include the limited time available to fix Clarifier 1 (the clarifier in the worst condition), seasonal timing constraints, sequencing to maintaining reliable process operation safely, and budgetary limitations. We believe our team has a unique combination of attributes to make your project successful: previous work for the District, a local team, and recent clarifier rehabilitation experience. Carollo has completed similar projects for the cities of Richmond (through Veolia Water), Daly City, and San Jose, California, and the City of Dallas, Texas. The Carollo team was selected to apply focused expertise with secondary clarifier upgrades and pre-purchasing of equipment. Key team member qualifications include:  Scott Parker – Principal-in-Charge (29 years of experience). Scott has completed several successful projects for STPUD including the Big 5 Pump Station Condition Assessment, Twin Peaks Pump Station and Water Line Replacement, and Headworks Replacement Project. He has built his career on providing high quality designs for wastewater facilities throughout California, one of which included emergency repairs to a secondary clarifier in Chico.  Mike Britten – Project Manager (45 years of experience). Mike relocated to the Reno office from our Walnut Creek office. He recently completed his role as “liquids package” manager for the San Jose Regional Wastewater Facility CIP, which included managing the $40 million nitrification clarifier rehabilitation project. Prior to San Jose, Mike was responsible for several designs that involved secondary clarifiers for the cities of Turlock, South San Francisco, Half Moon Bay, Daly City, and Richmond.  Richard (Ricky) Gutierrez – Project Engineer (15 years of experience). Ricky, also Reno-based, has a broad range of experience with wastewater design and construction projects. Ricky recently completed his role as project manager for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumping System Project. He was responsible for developing bid packages for pre-purchasing 48 individual RAS pumps that were turned over to the contractor for installation. Thank you for the opportunity to continue providing services to STPUD. We are eager and ready to assist the District in completing this important project. Please let us know if you have any questions concerning our proposal or if you need any further information. Carollo Engineers takes no exceptions to the District’s Standard Consulting Agreement. Sincerely, CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC. Michael J. Britten, P.E. Scott E. Parker, P.E., BCEE Project Manager Principal-in-Charge 2 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL WATER AND WASTEWATER EXPERTS Founded in 1933, Carollo Engineers is an environmental engineering firm specializing in planning, design, and construction management of wastewater and water treatment facilities. We have provided these services for improvements to treatment facilities ranging in size from less than 1 mgd to more than 300 mgd in capacity. Carollo’s sole focus is to provide water and wastewater services for agencies such as yours. Because this is all we do, our success is driven by our ability to provide innovation and leadership in all of the areas that drive our industry. Cities, utilities, public agencies, and special districts of all sizes count on Carollo to help them navigate the increasingly complex challenges of cost-effectively and sustainably protecting public health; meeting local, state, and federal regulatory requirements; protecting the water environment; and addressing public expectations. Our core philosophy for success is to work collaboratively with our clients to find the best ways to protect and enhance our public water supplies and environment. Carollo is a recognized leader in developing innovative solutions to address wastewater related issues facing public agencies. We have provided planning, design, and construction-phase services for many new and improved wastewater treatment facilities. Our experience includes: •Facility planning/master planning •Headworks facilities, including influent screening, grit removal, and pumping •Flow equalization •Primary clarification and secondary clarification •Secondary treatment using fixed film and suspended growth treatment processes for BOD/ammonia removal •Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal •Disinfection using chlorine gas, sodium hypochlorite, low and medium-pressure ultraviolet (UV), and ozone •Tertiary filtration •Digester gas reuse (e.g., cogeneration) •Biosolids pumping, thickening, digestion, dewatering, and reuse •Odor control facilities Secondary Clarifi ers Carollo has extensive experience in evaluating, optimizing, and designing secondary clarifiers with similar features outlined in your request for proposals (RFP). These features include weir placement, weir and launder cleaning systems, scum removal, optimization of square and round clarifiers, and process assessment. We also have experience with collector mechanism design, flocculating well design, energy dissipation inlet design, and hydraulic/ density current assessments. Some of the innovative tools and methods we use to design, evaluate, and optimize secondary clarifier performance include detailed hydraulic analysis, computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling, stress testing, velocity profile testing, and state point analysis to assess and address clarification and thickening problems. SAMPLE WORK PRODUCT As requested, we have provided a sample work product from the Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant Critical Improvements Project in Appendix A. This project had elements similar to your Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation project and involved team members Scott Parker, Mike Britten, and Mike Dadik. The first sample is a Project Memorandum that summarizes the CFD model results from an evaluation of increasing secondary clarifier capacity. The second sample is a partial set of plans depicting the scope of work for replacement of secondary clarifier mechanisms and structural modifications. RELEVANT AND RECENT PROJECTS The table on the next page highlights some of Carollo’s experience with secondary clarifier design. It is followed by detailed descriptions and references for projects completed within the last five years that are directly applicable to the District’s Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation. We invite you to contact these references to verify Carollo’s quality and responsiveness on similar projects. 1. Firm Experience TECHNICAL PROPOSAL 3 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Secondary Clarifi er Design Experience Secondary Clarifi erRAS Conveyance and ControlWAS PumpingHydraulic Modeling/Flow SplitProcess ModelingCFD ModelingProject | Client Project Cost Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant Critical Improvements | Veolia Water $4.5M  Secondary Clarifi er No. 5 and Denitrifi cation | City of Turlock, CA $18M   Water Pollution Control Plant Rehabilitation Reliability Upgrade | City of San Leandro, CA $41M   Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility | Eastern Municipal Water District, CA $15M  Southwest Water Reclamation Facility Clarifi er Rehabilitation | Manatee County, FL $4M  Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Major Maintenance and Rehabilitation Improvements | Dallas Water Utilities, TX $19M  South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant | City of South San Francisco, CA $30M  Secondary Treatment Facilities Expansion | Fairfi eld-Suisun Sewer District, CA $22M  Water Pollution Control Plant 12-mgd Expansion | City of Chico, CA $46M  Secondary Clarifi er Improvements | North San Mateo County Sanitation District, CA $31M   Secondary Treatment Improvements | Orange County Sanitation District, CA $8M  Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion | City of Roseville, CA $31M  PAR 942 North Secondary Clarifi ers | Metro Wastewater Reclamation District, CO $55M  Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility Organic Upgrades| City of Fresno, CA $111M  Carollo provided design and engineering services during construction for Veolia Water’s Critical Improvements to the Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant. Design objectives included: •Replace aging, failing, and inefficient facilities that are essential to grit, BOD, and TSS removal •Improve the wastewater treatment plant’s overall reliability with respect to grit, BOD, and TSS removal •Reduce health and safety impacts to plant staff Secondary clarifier improvements included replacement of the secondary clarifier mechanisms and structural modifications to optimize performance by replacing infrastructure that was in very poor condition and did not provide adequate, safe access to the clarifiers. The project also included new screening and grit removal improvements and aeration upgrades. A fine screening system with mechanical bar screens and a vortex grit removal system provides additional screening of rags and debris that pass through to downstream processes. Mechanical surface aerators were replaced with a modern and energy-efficient diffused aeration system. The upgrades resulted in improved secondary clarifier process performance. POINT OF CONTACT »Mr. Ryan Smith, Director of Water Resource Recovery, Phone 510-620-5486 Email ryan_smith@ci.richmond.ca.us COMPLETION DATE »June 2019 Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant Critical Improvements, Veolia Water, CA 4 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Secondary Clarifi er No. 5 and Denitrifi cation Facilities, City of Turlock, CA For more than 25 years, Carollo has assisted The City of Turlock with design and construction of new facilities to meet California Title 22 tertiary recycled water requirements and to provide flexibility to discharge domestic effluent to the river year-round or off site to recycled water customers. Carollo has also completed several permit-related projects, including NPDES compliance study, effluent toxicity study, ammonia toxicity study, THM reduction pilot-plant studies, and alternative disinfection studies. Carollo provided planning, design, construction management, bidding services, and engineering services during construction for a new (fifth) secondary clarifier at Turlock’s Regional Water Quality Control Facility to increase capacity and improve secondary treatment performance. The $18 million project converted seven aeration basins to achieve denitrification of the plant effluent to meet the new discharge permit limit for nitrate plus nitrite of 10 mg/L (as N). Other project design elements included a mixed liquor flow distribution structure, return activated sludge (RAS) pumping station and flow-paced RAS control, scum pumping station, additions and modifications to electrical and instrumentation systems, and associated yard piping and paving and grading improvements. Preliminary design included a detailed comparative evaluation of recent clarifier technology improvements. Carollo is now managing the construction and startup for the project. POINT OF CONTACT »Mr. Stephen Fremming, Project Manager Phone 209-668-5599 Email sfremming@turlock.ca.us COMPLETION DATE »July 2019 San Leandro Water Pollution Control Plant Rehabilitation, City of San Leandro, CA Carollo provided planning and design services for $51 million in improvements to San Leandro’s Water Pollution Control Plant to accommodate a dry weather flow capacity of 7.6 mgd and a peak wet weather flow capacity of 27.5 mgd. The project involved flow/ load estimates, analysis of unit process performance, and condition assessment of various structures. Design included raw sewage pumping, mechanical screening/ handling, grit removal/processing/handling, primary clarifiers, flow equalization facilities, odor control, secondary clarifier rehabilitation, digester rehabilitation, and other improvements. Project highlights include: •Improved aesthetics and odor control •Reduced risk of sanitary sewer overflows by restoring plant capacity and increasing wet weather capacity •Simplified operations and maintenance by increasing reliability and providing redundancy •Maintained plant operations during construction by phasing improvements and specifying shutdowns/ constraints in conjunction with plant operations •Provided new LEED-certified administration building for plant, operations, and laboratory personnel •Ensured seamless project funding by securing a low-interest State Revolving Fund loan •Saved capital cost and ensured compact footprint by implementing flow equalization and repurposing abandoned tanks POINT OF CONTACT »Mr. Justin Jensen, WPCP Plant Manager Phone 510-577-3434 Email jjenson@sanleandro.org COMPLETION DATE »September 2018 5 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion, Eastern Municipal Water District, CA Carollo provided planning, preliminary design, final design, and construction services for a comprehensive plant expansion to 14 mgd for the San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility, which had only secondary treatment capabilities. The first project phase involved design of $13.8 million in new secondary effluent equalization and tertiary treatment facilities to provide Title 22 approved reclaimed water. The tertiary facilities included cloth-media disk filters, alum chemical facility, and return water pump station. The existing chlorine contact basins and effluent splitter box were modified to provide contingency measures for out-of-compliance effluent, as required by Title 22. The subsequent Tertiary Treatment and Plant 2 project provided a new headworks facility with bar screens and vortex-type grit removal system; two 100-foot-diameter circular primary clarifiers; aeration basin for nitrification-denitrification; blower building; three 125-foot-diameter circular secondary clarifiers; primary sludge, RAS/WAS, and scum pumping; secondary treatment polymer facility; additional cloth-media type tertiary filters; tertiary chemical building; flocculation basins; out-of-compliance and tertiary effluent storage ponds; filter influent pump station modifications/additions; utility water and tertiary effluent pump station; aeration basins and WAS pump station improvements; standby power generation facility; chlorine contact tank; soil filter type foul air scrubbing system; two return water pump stations; expansion of biosolids handling processes; and a 10,000-square-foot operations and maintenance building. Southwest Water Reclamation Facility Clarifi er Rehabilitation, Manatee County, FL The Southwest Water Reclamation facility has a permitted capacity of 22 mgd and has experienced significant deterioration. The four secondary clarifiers’ mechanisms and headworks equipment are more than 20 years old and beyond their useful life. Much of the equipment and concrete affiliated with the headworks is deteriorated and in need of restoration or replacement, and the scum ejector equipment for Clarifiers 3 and 4 are no longer operational. Carollo was retained to design the following components: •Rehabilitated headworks facility, including structural rehabilitation, channel modifications, new screenings conveyors, and new grit classifier and removal system •New clarifier mechanisms and effluent launders for Clarifiers 1 through 4 •New variable frequency drives for RAS Pump Nos. 2, 4, 5, and 6 •New scum pumping systems for Clarifier 3 and 4 •New electrical, instrumentation, and controls wiring and conduits to support new/rehabilitated facilities Carollo designed the project in multiple phases to allow the plant to be in operation while improvements were constructed. The headworks upgrades were designed to maintain facility operation by isolating individual channels. Replacement of the clarifiers’ mechanisms, screenings conveyors, and grit classifiers dramatically improved plant reliability and efficiency. New scum pumps allowed the City to eliminate the scum wet wells, which had been a source of odors and problematic operations and maintenance. The new variable frequency drives improved operational efficiency and will prolong the life of the existing pumps. POINT OF CONTACT »Mr. Jeff Streitmatter, Project Management Division Manager, Phone 941-708-7450 Email jeff .streitmatter@mymanatee.org COMPLETION DATE »December 2017 POINT OF CONTACT »Mr. Charles Bachmann, Assistant General Manager of Engineering Phone 951-928-3777 Email bachmannc@emwd.org COMPLETION DATE »September 2015 6 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL From our discussions with the District, we have developed an approach that will meet your long-term needs for reliability and process performance. Our objective is to collaborate with your operations and maintenance (O&M) team to identify needed improvements and prioritize them according to criticality, cost, and time requirements. We will help the District develop a project that makes business sense from a life-cycle perspective and one that will not jeopardize continuous operation of the secondary clarifiers and the District’s ability to meet discharge permit requirements throughout the year. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The District’s wastewater facility includes three secondary clarifiers. Clarifier 1 is 53 years old and has been used exclusively for conventional secondary sedimentation of the mixed liquor process stream. Clarifier 2 is also 53 years old, and Clarifier 3 is 47 years old. Clarifiers 2 and 3 were originally designed to provide a second stage of clarification assisted by chemical addition. Therefore, the interior concrete surfaces and sludge collection mechanisms for these clarifiers were exposed to a somewhat corrosive environment. Clarifiers 2 and 3 are also about 3 feet lower than Clarifier 1. The District now operates Clarifiers 2 and 3 as conventional secondary clarifiers (without chemicals) in parallel with Clarifier 1. Because all three clarifiers operate at different elevations, the flow must be regulated to provide an even distribution of flow and solids loadings. The District performed a condition assessment of the treatment plant, including the secondary clarifiers, in 2013. Findings from the assessment are summarized in the following table. Since the 2013 assessment, the District has found other deficiencies: •The drive for Clarifier 1 is failing, and there are holes in the sludge collector arms. The clarifier mechanisms were manufactured by Dorr Oliver, which has long been out of business. Replacement parts are not available and must be custom manufactured. To maintain operational reliability, rehabilitation of Clarifier 1 should receive the highest priority. Replacing just the drive may not be feasible, so it is likely that the entire sludge withdrawal mechanism will need to be replaced. •The clarifier drive platforms for all three clarifiers are unusually small and the “dog house” weather enclosure on the center is very cramped. Snow also accumulates on the walkways to all of the clarifiers making access difficult and hazardous in the winter. •The activated sludge process experiences episodes of poorly settling mixed liquor solids. Sludge volume index (SVI) values can peak as a high as 600. A well-settling sludge has SVIs of around 150. At high SVIs, the sludge blanket does not consolidate well and the solids can rise to near the height of the overflow weirs. If the sludge blanket were to carry over the weir, the solids would overload the downstream filters and increase the risk of discharge permit violations. Peak flows exacerbate this condition. •The clarifiers do not have a peripheral baffle plate just upstream of the overflow weirs. Hydraulic improvements, such as internal baffles, may be needed to improve flow patterns and settling performance. CFD modeling is the best tool for optimizing performance and identifying specific improvements. A key challenge for this project is to complete improvements for Clarifier 1 by the end of the 2020 construction season, which ends October 31. The figure on the next page is a conceptual project schedule. Approximately nine months are needed for submittal review and fabrication/delivery, plus another two months for installation of the equipment. In addition, the foundation for the center column appears to be too small to support a new center column designed for current seismic codes. Replacing the mechanism will trigger the need to comply with current structural codes. Based on our experience, the foundation will likely need to be replaced with a new slab designed for the required anchor bolt embedment and to resist over-turning. Sufficient time needs to be allocated for the seismic analysis and design of the foundation modifications. 2. Firm’s Approach to Project Condition Assessment Findings Area Condition Repairs Recommended Concrete Floors Hollow areas between grout and slab Replace grout layer Rake Arms Exterior rust with no surviving coating Repair steel and coat with epoxy Center Column Exterior rust with no surviving coating Repair steel and coat with epoxy Weirs Coating on steel weirs is intact Replace with FRP weirs Catwalk/Bridge Galvanized steel with failing coating None required for at least 10 years B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\04-Schedule.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Design Notice to Proceed (9/5/19) Data Collection and Review Collect and Review Data Preliminary Site Investigations Design Survey Clarifier Floors and Walls Clarifier Center Column Sesimic Analysis CFD Analysis Develop and Evaluate Alternatives Prepare Design Memorandum (30% Design) Prepare 90% Design Prepare Final Contruction Documents (2/14/20) Bidding Services Contract Award Construction Notice to Proceed Complete Rehab Clarifier 1 (10/31/20) Pre-Purchase Documents (Optional) Pre-Purchase Workshop Draft Pre-Purchase Bid Package Final Pre-Purchase Bid Package Bid Period Pre-Purchase Contract Award Pre-Purchase Contract NTP Submittals Fabrication and Delivery – Clarifier 1 Mechanism Installation by Contractor Meetings/Workshops Kickoff Meeting Design Memorandum Review 90% Design Workshop Deliverables (not including pre-purchase deliverables) Design Memorandum (30% Design) 90% Design Submittal and Cost Estimate 100% Design Submittal and Cost Estimate Preconstruction Conference Agenda and Notes Addenda (as required) Bid Analysis Memorandum 2019 2020 TASK SO SONDJ FMAMJ JA 7 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL As described in more detailed under the Approach section, we propose a separate parallel task for pre-purchasing and installing the Clarifier equipment. The mechanism for Clarifier 1 would be procured on a fast track basis. The other two clarifiers could be delivered later for the following construction seasons. All three clarifiers should be procured from a single manufacturer for uniformity and all three clarifier mechanism would be installed under a single construction contract. The key to meeting the October 2020 deadline is to accelerate the schedule for the seismic analysis, new center column foundation design, preparation of the equipment pre-purchase bid package, and manufacturer selection. This will require a collaborative effort between the District and Carollo. After the first push to meet the October 2020 deadline for Clarifier 1, it may be prudent to spread out the time for replacing the clarifier mechanisms for Clarifiers 2 and 3. Consideration should be given to completing the rehabilitation at the pace of one clarifier per year to allow time for critical decisions, reduce the risk of clarifier overloading and potential effluent discharge violations, and develop District funding strategies. One of the key decisions to be made is whether new mechanisms should be installed for Clarifiers 2 and 3 or whether they should be rehabilitated in place. Our team will perform a life-cycle cost and risk analysis to assist the District in making this decision. Some of the issues to be evaluated include: •The life span of a rehabilitated mechanism should be compared to that of a new mechanism. •Installing a new grout topping on the clarifier needs to be done with the new (or existing) mechanism in place so it can be swept in to meet clearance tolerances between the floor and the sludge collector arms. If the grout layer were to be replaced using the existing mechanism, it would likely need to be replaced again when the new mechanism is installed. •Consideration should be given to replacing the mechanisms with a more modern system. A suction-type system would be more efficient in removing the sludge blanket and preventing it from rising to dangerously high levelsT. However, the current design of the RAS line draw-off may preclude a suction draw-off system. •Converting to a suction header system may require modifications to the RAS pumps. APPROACH Our overall approach will be to fast-track procurement of the clarifier mechanism for Clarifier 1 while continuing to design improvements for all three clarifiers. Clarifier 1 would be fully rehabilitated (including new mechanisms) in 2020. Clarifiers 2 and 3 would be rehabilitated at the rate of one clarifier per season over 2021/22 and 2022/23, respectively. This approach would allow time to pre-purchase, fabricate, and deliver the sludge withdrawal mechanisms. The benefits of pre-purchasing the clarifier mechanisms for all three clarifiers would be uniform equipment for all three clarifiers, the ability to design to the details provided by the selected manufacturer, and locked-in costs. Limiting the rehabilitation to one clarifier per year would reduce the District’s risk of discharge permit violations during peak loading events, such as the July 4th weekend. Based on our current understanding, we propose the following scope and timeline for clarifier improvements. Clarifi er 1 (2019/2020) •Pre-purchased clarifier mechanism (possibly for all three clarifiers) •Concrete wall repairs and coatings •New grout topping on the clarifier floor •New sludge withdrawal mechanism spot and center column foundation •Performance improvements such as a peripheral baffles and new fiberglass weirs Clarifi ers 2 and 3 (2021-2023) •Concrete repairs and coatings and performance improvements •Replacement of the sludge withdrawal mechanisms, walkways, and platforms (if desired by the District) or, if new mechanisms are not provided, spot repairs and coatings on the existing mechanism •New grout topping layer •Improvements to the RAS pump stations, if required •New foundation for center columns designed to match the details of the vendor submittal (if required) •Potentially, improvements to the groundwater relief system Task 1 – Data Collection and Review This task will involve establishing baseline conditions for the three clarifiers. As-built drawings and previous condition assessments will be reviewed, along with historical performance data over the past few years. Performance data needed includes mixed liquor SVI values, secondary effluent quality (BOD and suspended 8 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL solids), and influent loadings (flow and mixed liquor suspended solids). Influent loadings will be correlated with effluent quality to establish loading limitations, especially during peak months. This will be used to develop timing constraints for the clarifier rehabilitations. This data will also be used to input to a CFD model to evaluate the need for hydraulic improvements. In addition, our team will review groundwater level data (if available) and previous geotechnical reports. This information will be used to assess the effects of groundwater uplift pressures on the clarifier floor slab and determine if groundwater dewatering would be required to construct the new center column foundation. Task 2 – Design 2.1 Site Investigations and Survey Under this task, our team will perform a spot survey to check that the tops of the clarifier walls are level and the clarifier floors are sloping uniformly as originally constructed. In some instances, clarifier floors can bulge if subjected to unrelieved groundwater pressures. Spot checks will be compared to the District’s 2016 aerial survey of the site. In addition, we propose to add CFD analysis to identify any deficiencies with the flow patterns and velocities in the clarifiers and identify possible improvements. 2.2 Condition Assessment A detailed condition assessment will be conducted by our subconsultant, JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. The condition assessment will include visual and non-destructive concrete testing and ultrasonic testing of steel structures. Results from the assessment will be used to develop the scope of the clarifier rehabilitation. 2.3 Seismic Analysis and Groundwater Uplift Analysis A structural analysis will be performed to determine the need for a new center column foundation if a new clarifier mechanism is installed. In addition, the clarifier walls will be evaluated for compliance with current seismic codes. An analysis of groundwater uplift forces and potential pressure relief system improvements will be conducted. 2.4 – Alternatives Development and Evaluation Our team will work with the District to identify the project’s objectives and focus the alternatives analysis on solving the most important issues. Potential alternatives to be evaluated include: •Scope for rehabilitating the sludge withdrawal mechanisms – i.e., spot repairs and coatings versus all new mechanisms •Pre-purchasing of clarifier mechanisms •Cost estimates and cash flow analysis •Hydraulic improvements based on CFD analysis •Concrete repair/coating methods •Potential modifications to the groundwater relief system or recommended procedures when a clarifier needs to be emptied 2.5 – Alternatives Evaluation Workshop Our team will conduct a workshop with the District to review the alternatives analysis and recommendations. The desired outcome of the workshop will be the scope of the rehabilitations, project phasing/schedule, and cost estimate. Results from this workshop will be the framework for pre-purchasing the clarifier mechanism for Clarifier 1 and potentially for the other two clarifiers (see Task 2.6). 2.6 – Design Memorandum The Design Memorandum will summarize the results of the alternatives workshop and baseline conditions. The memorandum will be the basis for design and will be developed to approximately the 30 percent design stage. 2.7 – Basis of Design Workshop A workshop will be conducted with the District to review the Design Memorandum and confirm the basis for completing the 90 percent design. 2.8 – 90 Percent Design Documents The 90 percent design will be submitted to the District for review. A workshop will be held to review the design and incorporate comments for the final 100 percent design. The 90 percent cost estimate will also be presented. Details of the pre-purchased clarifier mechanism submittal will be incorporated in the design. Task 3 – Construction Documents (100 Percent Design) Final documents suitable for bidding will be prepared, including drawings, specifications, and final engineer’s estimate. It is assumed that the construction documents will encompass rehabilitation of all three clarifiers and the clarifier mechanisms will be pre-purchased by the District and assigned to the successful bidder for installation. Task 4 – Bidding Services This task will include attending the pre-bid conference and providing clarifications to questions from bidders by preparing addenda. In addition, our team will provide a bid analysis summary to provide the basis for the District to determine responsiveness of the bidders. 9 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Task 5 – Project Management Project management services will include resource management and preparation of monthly reports. OPTIONAL SERVICES The following tasks will be completed if authorized by the District. Task 6 – Pre-Purchase Documents 6.1 Scoping Workshop. Given the time constraints for Clarifier 1, it will be necessary to pre-purchase the clarifier mechanism to gain time over the conventional contractor- procured method. We propose to hold a workshop to discuss the procurement approach. Minutes from the workshop will be the basis for developing the pre-purchase documents. The objectives of the workshop include: •Confirm the scope of repairs for Clarifier 1, including needs for seismic upgrades and concrete coatings •Identify a short list of at least three manufacturers to be named in the pre-purchase documents •Identify needs and materials for the new catwalk, center platform, and center column •Identify needs for the new center column foundation •Decide whether new mechanisms for Clarifiers 2 and 3 will be included in the pre-purchase contract •Establish a budget estimate and schedule for the pre-purchase contract •Determine terms of the pre-purchase contract: full pre- purchase of the equipment including full payment by the District, or payment only for submittal preparation and assignment of the clarifier contract to the installation contractor •Identify District front-end specifications/conditions for a pre-purchase contract 6.2 Pre-Purchase Package. Carollo will prepare pre-purchase package specifications and guide drawings suitable for bidding by vendors. The pre-purchase package will be prepared in draft and finalized with the District’s comments. 6.3 Bidding Services for Pre-Purchase Contract. Our team will answer questions during the bid period and prepare addenda as required. We will also evaluate the vendor bids for responsiveness. It is assumed that the District will conduct a pre-bid conference is required. 6.4 Review Vendor Submittals. This step is critical for maintaining the fast-track schedule. Our team will provide technical review of the clarifier submittals in parallel with the District’s team from engineering, operations, and maintenance. The vendor can begin fabrication once approval of the submittals is issued by the District. The District may need to fund some portion of the pre-purchase contract to allow for the vendor’s effort to develop the submittals and expedite approvals. Task 7 – CFD Modeling Two-dimensional dynamic CFD modeling will be performed for the current clarifier configurations to identify flow velocities and improvements to enhance settling. Results from the analysis will be summarized in a brief technical memorandum. DELIVERABLES The following deliverables are proposed: •Design Memorandum, draft and final versions •Clarifier pre-purchase workshop meeting notes •Clarifier pre-purchase package specifications •Review comments for the clarifier submittal •90 percent design submittal for the overall installation contract, including plans, specifications, construction constraints, and cost estimate •Final contract documents suitable for bidding and a final engineer’s estimate •Meeting agendas and notes •Addenda (three assumed) 10 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Carollo’s team brings a proven track record of developing successful solutions to complex wastewater treatment challenges. We have a strong history with clients throughout California and will use this experience to help the District make sound decisions and deliver an innovative design that optimizes your future investment. Our key team members’ local presence and connectivity to the South Lake Tahoe area foster successful collaboration from design through construction. SENIOR LEADERSHIP YOU CAN TRUST Superior leadership provides credibility for all of your technical decisions and ultimately translates into better outcomes for the District. Our project team brings knowledge gained from years of experience. In addition, our team has proven experience with a wide range of secondary clarifier design projects at other locations to give you confidence that we will provide state-of-the-art rehabilitation of your secondary clarifiers. Mike Britten, PE | Project Manager Tel: 775-324-4427 | Email: mbritten@carollo.com Mike has 45 years of experience in planning and design of wastewater treatment plants, with an emphasis on expansion and upgrade of existing facilities. He recently completed his role as program manager for the $40 million San Jose Nitrification Clarifier Project, which involved rehabilitation of 16 140-foot-diameter clarifiers. Many of the issues facing the District were addressed in the design, including concrete repairs, new grout toppings, groundwater relief valves, and new sludge withdrawal mechanisms. Mike was also project manager for secondary clarifiers at the City of Turlock, Sewer Authority Mid-Coastside (Half Moon Bay), City of South San Francisco, and Veolia Water/Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant. As project manager, Mike will be responsible for overall implementation of the technical aspects of your project. He will also be responsible for meeting the budget and schedule, control of project activities, commitment of resources, and technical accuracy of the work. He will also serve as principal liaison between Carollo and the District throughout the project. Scott Parker, PE, BCEE | Principal-in-Charge/ Technical Advisor Tel: 916-576-4720 | Email: sparker@carollo.com Scott has more than 29 years of experience with a wide array of planning, design, and construction projects for wastewater treatment and conveyance. He is well known to the District, having served as principal-in-charge for the Big 5 Pump Station Condition Assessment, Twin Peaks Pump Station and Water Line Replacement, and Headworks Replacement. Scott will have ultimate responsibility for your project. He will participate in all contract matters and monitor procedures for quality control and project progress. Scott will support Mike to maintain the budget, schedule, and commitment of resources. 3. Project Team Key Team Member Availability Percent Available for This Project Commitment to Other Projects Mike Britten, Project Manager 25% 75% Scott Parker, Principal-in-Charge and Technical Advisor 10% 70% Ricky Gutierrez, Project Engineer 35% 65% Ed Wicklein, CFD Modeling 25% 75% Mike Dadik, Structural/Coatings 20% 80% Daniel Robinson, EI&C 20% 80% Eric McGrath, Pre-Purchase Package 20% 80% PROJECT MANAGER Mike Britten, PE* * Reno Based 1 CTA Engineering & Surveying 2 JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. PROJECT ENGINEER Ricky Gutierrez, PE* Stephen Caswell, PE PROJECT MANAGER CFD MODELING Ed Wicklein, PE PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Scott Parker, PE, BCEE STRUCTURAL/COATINGS Mike Dadik, PE, SE ELECTRICAL/I&C Daniel Robinson, PE PRE-PURCHASE PACKAGE Eric McGrath, PE* SURVEYING Kevin Heeney, PLS 2 CONDITION ASSESSMENT Darby Howard, PE 2 11 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Ricky Gutierrez, PE | Project Engineer Tel: 530-312-1330 | Email: rgutierrez@carollo.com Ricky has 15 years of experience in a broad range of projects involving planning, design, and construction of wastewater treatment facilities, water treatment facilities, pipelines, and pump stations. As project engineer, Ricky will be responsible for discipline coordination and day-to-day engineering of your project to produce the plans, specifications, and cost estimates. STRONG DISCIPLINE SUPPORT Discipline support will be provided by experienced professionals who have completed projects of similar size and complexity. Ed Wicklein, PE | CFD Modeling Ed has 21 years of experience focused on design and analysis of municipal hydraulic and treatment facilities using CFD modeling. He has experience in all phases of modeling, including code development, flow analysis, and data visualization. Ed has completed more than 100 CFD projects, which have included CFD analysis of flow splitting structures and secondary sedimentation processes. Mike Dadik, PE, SE | Structural and Coatings Mike is Carollo’s structural practice leader for Northern California. With more than 28 years of experience, Mike specializes in water and wastewater treatment and infrastructure design, seismic rehabilitation and retrofit, and coating and corrosion control. Mike has performed structural design of more than $300 million in wastewater expansion and rehabilitation projects. Daniel Robinson, PE | Electrical/Instrumentation & Controls (EI&C) Daniel has 20 years of EI&C systems experience, including SCADA and control systems analysis and design; variable frequency drive, reduced voltage soft starter, and full-voltage motor control design; programmable logic controller/control panel design; control systems architecture; serial, Ethernet, and radio communication; process instrumentation requirements; and UL, NEC, NEMA, and NFPA 70E requirements. Eric McGrath, PE | Pre-Purchase Package Eric is a civil engineer with more than 32 years of experience, including management of construction plan and specification development for a variety of water and wastewater civil engineering projects. Kevin Heeney, PLS | Surveying Kevin is a Principal Surveyor with CTA Engineering and Surveying. For 43 years, he has been involved with surveying and mapping projects throughout California, drawing on his knowledge of technologies and his project management skills to ensure the successful completion of projects. Darby Howard, PE | Condition Assessment Darby has 35 years of experience specializing in corrosion failure analysis, material selection for corrosive environments, cathodic protection design and engineering maintenance, and stray current analysis for water and wastewater pump stations, treatment plants, and pipelines. Darby worked with Carollo on STPUD’s Big 5 Pump Station Condition Assessment. Team Member Qualifi cations and Experience Team Member Relevant Project Experience Mike Britten, PE Project Manager Reno Offi ce BS Civil Engineering 45 Years of Experience • Program manager for the City of San Jose, CA, Nitrifi cation Clarifi er Rehabilitation project. • Project manager for design of the City of Turlock, CA, Secondary Clarifi er No. 4. • Project manager for design of the City of San Francisco, CA, Clarifi ers 3 and 4. • Project manager for the Sewer Authority Mid-Coastside, CA, Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, which included two new circular secondary clarifi ers. • Project manager for the Veolia Water, CA, Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant Secondary Clarifi er Improvements. Scott Parker, PE, BCEE Principal-in-Charge/ Technical Advisor Sacramento Offi ce MS Environmental, BS Civil Engineering 29 Years of Experience • Principal-in-charge/project manager for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, CA, Headworks Replacement and Twin Peaks Booster Station and Water Line Replacement. • Principal-in-charge/project manager for the Fairfi eld-Suisun Sewer District, CA, $22 million Secondary Treatment Expansion, which included conversion of an intermediate clarifi er and new secondary clarifi ers. • Principal-in-charge for the City of Chico, CA, $45 million Water Pollution Control Plant Expansion to 12 mgd. New facilities include headworks, aeration tanks, aeration blowers, secondary clarifi er, etc. • Project manager/engineer for the City of Chico, CA, $33 million 9-mgd nitrifi cation improvements, which involved headworks, primary clarifi ers, anaerobic digesters, secondary clarifi ers, and aeration blowers. 12 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\01-TechProposal.indd TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Team Member Qualifi cations and Experience Team Member Relevant Project Experience Ricky Gutierrez, PE Project Engineer Reno Offi ce MS Civil and Environmental, BS Civil Engineering 15 Years of Experience • Project engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, CA, Process and Hydraulic Analysis, which involved an evaluation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant that focused on the activated sludge unit process. • Design engineer and resident engineer during construction of the City of Chico, CA, Water Pollution Control Plant 12-mgd Expansion, which included a new headworks facility, aeration tanks, secondary clarifi er, digester, etc. • Project manager for the Fairfi eld-Suisun Sewer District, CA, Blower Replacement, which enhanced the reliability and effi ciency of the secondary treatment process aeration system. • Project engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, CA, EchoWater Project $32 million Return Activated Sludge Pumping Project, which includes 48 pumps located at 24 secondary sedimentation tanks. Ed Wicklein, PE CFD Modeling Seattle Offi ce MS/BS Civil Engineering, Hydraulics 21 Years of Experience • Project engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, CA, Headworks Replacement. Used CFD modeling to optimize fl ow split and velocity distribution in the channels leading to primary clarifi ers. • Project engineer for the West County Sewer District, CA, Secondary Clarifi er Improvements. Used a custom solids transpor t model to evaluate inlet baffl e improvements to increase the sedimentation capacity. • Project engineer for CFD modeling for the Vallejo Sanitation and Flood Control District, CA, Secondary Clarifi ers. Used the CFD model to evaluate performance for a range of commercially available products. Mike Dadik, PE, SE Structural and Coatings Walnut Creek Offi ce BS Civil Engineering 28 Years of Experience • Structural engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, CA, Sludge Handling/Odor Control Facilities and Headworks Replacement projects. • Structural engineer for preliminary and fi nal design of the City of Turlock, CA, Headworks and Secondary Treatment Capacity Expansion Phase 1. • Structural engineer for the Union Sanitary District, CA, Primary Clarifi er Rehabilitationpreliminary/fi nal design. • Structural engineer for the Fairfi eld-Suisun Sewer District, CA, $22 million Secondary Treatment Expansion, which included intermediate clarifi er, secondary clarifi ers, infl uent pump station, and aeration basin retrofi ts. Daniel Robinson, PE Electrical/I&C Sacramento Offi ce BS Mechanical Engineering Technology 20 Years of Experience • Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager for the City of Hughson, CA, Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, which included main lift station, headworks, oxidation ditch, and secondary clarifi er. • Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager for the City of Reno, NV, Water Reclamation Facility Expansion, which included headworks, oxidation ditch, aeration basin, secondary clarifi er, chlorine contact basin, etc. • Instrumentation and controls engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, CA, EchoWater Project $32 million Return Activated Sludge Pumping Project. Eric McGrath, PE Project Engineer Reno Offi ce (775-332-8732) BS Civil Engineering 32 Years of Experience • Project manager for the Washoe County, NV, Collection System Flow Monitoring and Hydraulic Modeling. • Project manager for the County of Washoe, NV, Pleasant Valley Interceptor 3 Predesign. • Project manager for the City of Millbrae, CA, Madrone Pump Station Rehabilitation and Preliminary Design. • Project engineer for the Contra Costa Water District, CA, Treated Water Renewal and Replacement Study Update Asset Management Plan. Kevin Heeney, PLS Surveying Engineering, Industry, and Technology 43 Years of Experience • Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, CA, EchoWater Projects. • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Deuel Vocational Institution Wastewater Treatment Plant Modifi cations mapping and Due Diligence documents. • City of Sacramento, CA, Sacramento River/E.A. Fairbairn Water Treatment Plants Rehabilitation topographic mapping. • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation California Men’s Colony Wastewater Treatment Plant UV Disinfection Design. J. Darby Howard, PE Condition Assessment BS Civil/Structural Engineering 35 Years of Experience • Corrosion assessment specialist for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, CA, Big 5 Pump Station Condition Assessment, which involved on-site corrosion evaluation of wet wells to assess extent of deterioration. • Delta Diablo, CA, Headworks Concrete Condition Assessment, which involved an inspection of the wastewater treatment plant screen channel, manhole infl uent pipe, and grit chamber pump room. • Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, CA, Arden Pump Station wet well condition assessment, including infl uent channels, sluice gates, hand rails, concrete walls, manholes, and various appurtenances. • City of San Mateo, CA, Wastewater Treatment Plant, which included a condition assessment of reinforced concrete exposed to wastewater in the infl uent junction box and recommendations for remedial repair based on fi ndings. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\02-ManhourEst.indd14TECHNICAL PROPOSAL4. Manhour EstimateESTIMATED LEVEL OF EFFORTTaskS. Parker M. Britten R. Gutierrez E. McGrath C. Taylor M. Dadik D. Robinson E. WickleinPrincipal-in-ChargeQA/QCProjectManagerProjectEngineerProjectEngineerPre-PurchaseStaff ProfessionalStructuralEngineerEI&CEngineerCFDModeling SeniorCADTechnicianGraphics/ CADTechnicianClericalSupportTotal TASK 1 – DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW 1.1 Kickoff Meeting 66804000004281.2 Review Operating Data, Reports, and Existing Conditions 1480840000025Task 1 Hours 7101601240000453TASK 2 – DESIGN2.1 Site Investigations and Survey 1110016000044362.2 Conduct Condition Assessment 04808000000202.3 Conduct Seismic Analysis and Groundwater Uplift Analysis 248002400400422.4 Alternatives Development and Evaluation 2416424640008682.5 Alternatives Evaluation Workshop 41212012000000402.6 Prepare Design Memorandum 2416016440048582.7 Basis of Design Workshop 066012000000242.8 Prepare 90% Design and Cost Estimate12264201232964053132295092.9 90% Design Workshop06601200000024Task 2 Hours 23671244223637205714049821TASK 3 – CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS3.1 Prepare 100% Design Documents and Cost Estimate6111805312270265314220Task 3 Hours 6111805312270265314220TASK 4 – BIDDING SERVICES4.1Attend Pre-Bid Conference02408000000144.2 Prepare Addenda121601622040414Task 4 Hours 142002422040428TASK 5 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT5.1 Resource Management and Monthly Reporting21680000000026Task 5 Hours21680000000026TASKS 1-5 TOTAL HOURS 39108186431281101087192711,148OPTIONAL SERVICESTASK 6 – PREPARE PRE-PURCHASE DOCUMENTS Task 6 Hours 21220404044081216158TASK 7 – CFD MODELINGTask 7 Hours241600004600068OPTIONAL SERVICES TOTAL HOURS 416364040444681216226 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Indd\03-InfoDocNeeds.indd 15TECHNICAL PROPOSAL The only information we anticipate needing from the District is data on historical groundwater levels, which will be used to assess the effects of groundwater uplift pressures on the clarifier floor slab and determine if groundwater dewatering would be required to construct the new center column foundation. 5. Information/Document Needs pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity PROJECT MEMORANDUM CITY OF RICHMOND WWTP CRITICAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT City of Richmond Prepared By: E. Wicklein Reviewed By: J. McCormick, A. Conklin, K. Rogers, D. Jenkins Subject: Feasibility of Increasing Secondary Clarifier Capacity Objective The objective of this project memorandum is to summarize the feasibility of implementing a new clarifier mechanism in each of the existing secondary clarifiers and to assess impact on capacity. Conclusion Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling was performed to assess the impact of the new mechanism on the plant capacity. Replacing the existing clarifier mechanisms with new mechanisms is not anticipated to increase the treatment capacity of the clarifiers. Recommendations It is recommended the City: • Replace the existing clarifier mechanisms with new clarifier mechanisms in order to replace aging infrastructure that has reached the end of its useful life and is essential to providing wastewater treatment. The mechanisms also need to be replaced because their current condition poses a safety hazard. These improvements should be implemented in the immediate term, as part of the WWTP Critical Improvements Project. • Should increased clarifier capacity be required in the future, it is recommended the City increase the firm return activated sludge (RAS) pumping capacity from 6.0 mgd to 13.0 mgd. • Should nutrient removal (e.g., nitrification and denitrification) be required in the future, it is recommended the City implement additional aeration basins and/or secondary clarifiers. Summary As identified in the 2010 WWTP Master Plan and 2016 WWTP Facility Plan, upgrades to the secondary clarifiers are required to improve the performance of the secondary treatment process to more reliably removal total suspended solids (TSS). The secondary clarifiers have some performance related issues and the secondary clarifier mechanisms have reached the end of their useful life. Secondary clarifier improvements were designed as part of the WWTP Critical Improvements Project to replace the aging mechanisms and address performance issues where feasible. As part of the design effort, an evaluation was completed to determine if additional modifications could be made to increase the treatment capacity of the clarifiers. The evaluation included three dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Date: 10/10/2017 Project No.: 10340A.10 Based on the evaluation, the overall structural shape of the clarifiers is the most significant factor limiting their capacity. Secondary Clarifiers No. 1 and 2 (SC-1 and SC-2) are square in shape, have a relatively shallow depth, and flat floor. Secondary Clarifier No. 3 (SC-3) - although round - is also relatively shallow and has a moderately sloped floor. As a result, although modifications can be made to the existing clarifiers to optimize their performance and increase their reliability, these modifications are not anticipated to increase their solids loading capacity or significantly improve their performance. The modifications will largely replace aging infrastructure that is essential to treatment operations. Replacing the mechanisms will also improve plant safety because their current condition poses a safety hazard. To maximize the use of existing assets and minimize costs, it is recommended the City implement the following improvements to replace aging infrastructure and optimize the performance of the secondary clarifiers (where feasible) to more reliably remove TSS: 1. Maintain even flow split between the clarifiers by setting the existing gates at predetermined positions. 2. Install a coarse air mixing system in the mixed liquor channel to ensure solids are well mixed and evenly split between the clarifiers. 3. Improve inlet conditions in the modified clarifier a. Replace the elevated inlet channel with a mid-depth suspended influent pipe that turns upward at the center of the tank and enters a conventional energy dissipating inlet (EDI) feed well. b. Add Stamford baffles to SC-3. 4. Replace the existing suction header type mechanism with a new suction header type mechanism. 5. Simplify and improve the suction header design: a. Fill in the deep center well with concrete so the floor is more level throughout the clarifier. b. Fill in the corners of the "squircles" with concrete to guide the sludge toward the circular removal header. With the implementation of these improvements, the secondary treatment capacity is estimated to be 20 million gallons per day (mgd) at a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of no more than 1,800 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and a sludge volume index (SVI) of 150 mL/g. This equates to an average and peak solids loading rate (SLR) of 4and 13 ppd/sf in the year 2027, respectively. This is sufficient treatment capacity to treat the projected near-term flows and loads for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and TSS removal without nitrification, and may be sufficient to treat projected flows and loads through 2027 assuming no changes in permit conditions. However, depending on the actual operating conditions of the secondary treatment process, influent flow and loads, and clarifier performance, additional improvements may be required to increase the secondary clarifier capacity prior to 2027. To increase the capacity of the secondary clarifiers, the firm RAS pumping capacity could be increased from 6.5 mgd to 13 mgd. With this improvement, the secondary treatment capacity is estimated to be 20 mgd at an MLSS concentration of no more than 2,200 mg/L and an SVI of 150 mL/g. This is anticipated to provide sufficient capacity to treat buildout flows and loads for BOD and TSS removal assuming no changes in permit conditions. However, during maximum month flows and loads, additional aeration basin volume may be required. It is anticipated the standby aeration capacity provided by Zones B and C of Aeration Basin No. 2 could be used during the maximum month conditions. (Note, this standby aeration capacity is to be implemented with the WWTP Critical Improvements Project.) It is anticipated additional aeration basins and/or secondary clarifiers would be required to provide nutrient removal (e.g., nitrification and denitrification). After the secondary clarifier improvements included in the WWTP Critical Improvements Project are implemented, it is recommended the City assess the actual performance of the secondary clarifiers. The Facility Plan and associated capital improvement program (CIP) could then be updated based on the secondary clarifier performance and any updates to the anticipated nutrient removal regulations. This memorandum summarizes the secondary clarifier performance issues, the CFD modeling approach, the CFD modeling results, and the recommended improvements. Secondary Clarifier Performances Issues As identified in the 2010 WWTP Master Plan and 2016 WWTP Facility Plan, the secondary clarifiers have the following performance issues: • In the square clarifiers (SC-1 and SC-2), sludge accumulates in the corners and turns septic. As a result, the sludge rises to the surface and goes over the effluent weirs, which contributes to poor performance and increases the potential for TSS violations. The Master Plan recommended filling in the corners of the clarifiers with concrete to make them more circular. This will allow the sludge to settle towards the center of the clarifiers, instead of accumulating in the corners. • The draft tubes in all three clarifiers clog frequently, causing the sludge blankets to rise in portions of the clarifiers that are serviced by the clogged draft tubes. The draft tubes clog because a large amount of debris passes through the coarse bar screen. The Master Plan recommended replacing the clarifier mechanism with a blade type collector that moves the sludge to the center of the clarifier for removal. • When operated at high flows, Clarifier No. 3 has solids carryover into the effluent. Possible reasons for this include clogged draft tubes and short-circuiting due to high weir overflow rates. The Master Plan recommended installing density current baffles to the clarifier and replacing the feed well with an energy dissipater/flocculating feed well. CFD Modeling Approach CFD modeling of the secondary clarifier performance was conducted to determine recommended improvements to address these issues. More specifically, it was conducted to determine the optimal mechanism design and to identify other modifications to the secondary clarifiers that could cost effectively improve performance and maximize capacity. Flows and Loads Table 1 summarizes the current and projected secondary influent flows and loads and operating conditions used for this analysis. The flows and loads were taken from the 2016 Facility Plan. The operating conditions are based on the design criteria for the WWTP Critical Improvements Project. Table 1 Current and Projected Future Operating Conditions Design Criteria Current (2015) Projected 2027 Projected 2040 Treatment Type BOD/TSS removal BOD/TSS removal BOD/TSS removal Average Dry Weather Secondary Effluent Flow, mgd (1) 5.8 6.5 7.4 RAS, mgd 3.7 4.2 4.7 Total Flow to Secondary Clarifiers, mgd 9.5 10.7 12.1 MLSS, mg/L 1,000 1,800 2,000 SVI, mL/g 150 150 150 Max Month Secondary Effluent Flow, mgd (1) 13.5 15.2 (3) 17.3 (3)(5) RAS, mgd 6.5 6.5 (3) 6.5 (3) Total Flow to Secondary Clarifiers, mgd 20 21.7 23.8 MLSS, mg/L 1,700 1,800 2,200 SVI, mL/g 150 150 150 Peak Wet Weather Secondary Effluent Flow, mgd 20 20 (3) 20 (4) RAS, mgd 6.5 6.5 (3) 13.0 (4) Notes: (1) Per 2016 WWTP Facility Plan. (2) RAS Pumping Capacity = 6.5 mgd (Firm); 13 mgd (Total). (3) Improvements to increase firm RAS pumping capacity from 6.5 mgd to 13.0 mgd may be required. (4) Improvements to increase firm RAS pumping capacity from 6.5 mgd to 13.0 mgd would be required. (5) Secondary treatment capacity may be limited by the solids loading rate (SLR) on the secondary clarifiers. Additional aeration basin volume may be required to treat maximum month flows and thereby reduce the MLSS concentration to reduce the SLR on the secondary clarifiers. CFD Model Configuration A model was developed of one of the "squircle" clarifiers (SC-1, SC-2) to evaluate the secondary clarifier performance. The SCs 1 and 2 have a slightly less optimum configuration than SC-3 and are therefore assumed to conservatively estimate the performance of SC-3. Furthermore, the recommended improvements to SCs 1 and 2 will make them more similar to SC-3. SCs 1 and 2 are "squircle" type clarifiers i.e. square with rounded corners. They have an elevated influent channel, inward flowing feed well, and an inboard launder. The bottom is nearly flat in most of the clarifier, with a deeper recessed section in the middle. SC-3 is a circular clarifier, with an elevated influent channel, inward flowing feed well, and an overflow weir located on the outside wall of the clarifier. The bottom is sloped in most of the clarifier, with a deeper recessed section in the middle. The model computational mesh size varied from 0.24 inches to approximately 4-inches with approximately 1.4 to 1.7 million computational elements. The model used a custom solids transport model based on sludge volume index (SVI) to evaluate sedimentation. Details such as an energy dissipating inlet (EDI) were not evaluated at this time, however it is assumed that an EDI would be included from the equipment supplier that promoted uniform inflow conditions. It is assumed that once the secondary clarifier improvements are implemented, the three secondary clarifiers will have similar treatment performance and capacity. As a result, the simulations assumed the total system flow was divided evenly between the three clarifiers. CFD Modeling Results Mechanism Type and Concrete Fillets The overall structural shape of the clarifiers is the most significant factor limiting their capacity. They are relatively shallow and flat compared to modern secondary clarifiers. As a result, although modifications can be made to the existing clarifiers to optimize their performance and increase their reliability, the CFD modeling results indicate these modifications are not anticipated to increase the capacity of the secondary clarifiers or significantly improve their performance. The model was initially setup with a scraper mechanism moving sludge to the center deeper drawoff well, and outward flowing feedwell. The performance was simulated at the maximum projected flow and load condition - 2040 maximum month flow of 17.3 mgd, a firm RAS capacity of 6.5 mgd, MLSS inflow of 3500 mg/l, and SVI of 150 mL/g. The model results (which are shown in Figure 1 of Appendix A), show the clarifiers appears overloaded and at or near failure. Based on the CFD modeling results, industry experience, and manufacturer recommendations it was determined a suction type mechanism would be the most appropriate technology for this application. In flat bottom clarifiers, suction-type mechanisms typically result in lower sludge blankets as compared to scraper- type mechanisms and generally perform better 1. Although draft tubes on suction headers can clog, the benefit of increased sludge removal outweighs this drawback. The modern suction header technology recommend is expected to be less prone to clogging than the existing suction header because the modern header has larger diameter draft tubes. However, it should be noted, the most effective way to reduce clogging issues would be to implement a new screening and grit removal facility at the WWTP. Several modifications to optimize basin performance were identified and modeled. These improvements include: • To achieve more even sludge withdrawal, implement a suction header. • To simplify the suction header design: - Fill in the deep center well with concrete so the floor is more level throughout the clarifier. - Fill in the corners of the "squircles" with concrete to guide the sludge toward the circular removal header • To improve the distribution of the influent flow within the clarifiers: - Replace the elevated inlet channel with a mid-depth suspended influent pipe that turns upward at the center of the tank and enters a conventional EDI feed well. - In Clarifier 3, add an EDI feed well to dissipate the energy of the influent flow and Stamford baffle to help control return density current. (Note, this baffle was not modeled but based on previous installations is anticipated to improve sedimentation.) The model was re-run to determine the maximum MLSS concentration that could be sustained at peak flow with the recommended improvements. Peak flow to the clarifiers was determined to be 26.5 mgd, which is comprised of the estimated peak day secondary process flow of 20 mgd and the firm RAS pumping capacity of 6.5 mgd. At this flow condition and an SVI of 150 ml/g, the estimated maximum MLSS is 1,800 mg/L. Figure 2 in Appendix A shows the clarifier performance at these conditions. 1 Per Ekama, G.A., Barnard, J., Gunthert, F., Krebs, P., McCorquodale, J.A., Parker, D.S., and Wahlberg, E.J. (1997). Secondary Settling Tanks: Theory, Modelling, Design and Operation. Published by the International Association on Water Quality, STR No. 6, 1997, Richmond, UK. This is sufficient treatment capacity to treat the projected near-term (2018 – 2023±) flows and loads for BOD and TSS removal, and may be sufficient to treat projected flows and loads through 2027. However, depending on the actual operating conditions of the secondary treatment process (e.g., SVI and SRT), influent flow and loads, and clarifier performance, additional improvements may be required to increase the secondary clarifier capacity prior to 2027. If the secondary clarifier capacity begins to be exceeded the City could implement the following operational changes to increase capacity: • Reduce the SVI. It is important to note, all analysis was based on an SVI of 150 mL/g. All options to reduce SVI to this level or lower should be explored first and foremost, as SVI will have a significant impact on the capacity. Options to reduce SVI include: - Add chlorine to the RAS line - Add polymer to the mixed liquor channel or aeration basins - Increase the anaerobic volume of the aeration basins • Use the standby aeration capacity provided by Zones B and C of Aeration Basin No. 2 for treatment. (Note, this standby aeration capacity is to be implemented with the WWTP Critical Improvements Project.) RAS Pumping Improvements To increase the capacity of the secondary clarifiers, the firm RAS pumping capacity could be increased from 6.5 mgd to 13 mgd. With this improvement, the secondary treatment capacity is estimated to be 20 mgd at an MLSS concentration of no more than 2,200 mg/L and an SVI of 150 mL/g. This is capacity is limited by the SLR on the secondary clarifiers. (Note, the total flow to the clarifiers would be 33 mgd = 20 mgd secondary process flow + 13 mgd RAS flow.) Figure 3 in Appendix A shows the clarifier performance at these conditions. This is planned to provide sufficient capacity to treat buildout flows and loads for BOD and TSS removal in dry weather. However, during maximum month flows and loads, additional aeration basin volume may be required to reduce the MLSS concentration and resulting SLR on the secondary clarifiers. It is anticipated the standby aeration capacity provided by Zones B and C of Aeration Basin No. 2 could be used during the maximum month conditions. (Note, this standby aeration capacity is to be implemented with the WWTP Critical Improvements Project.) Nutrient Removal Improvements The 2016 Facility Plan assumed the secondary treatment facilities could be optimized and expanded to provide nutrient removal (e.g. nitrification and denitrification) in the future to meet anticipated discharge regulations. It was assumed additional aeration basins would be required, but that the existing secondary clarifiers would have sufficient capacity. Operating at an aerobic SRT (aSRT) of around 7 days will likely be required in the future to provide nutrient removal. Based on process modeling results, operating at these elevated aSRTs will likely increase the MLSS concentration to around 3000 to 3500 mg/L. Based on the findings of the WWTP Critical Improvements design and this CFD modeling effort, it is anticipated both additional aeration basins and secondary clarifiers will be required to allow for operation at these higher aSRTs to provide nutrient removal. Figure 7 in Appendix A shows the secondary clarifier approaches failure when the MLSS concentration is increased to 3,500 mg/L. After the secondary clarifier improvements included in the WWTP Critical Improvements Project are implemented, it is recommended the City assess the actual performance of the secondary clarifiers. The Facility Plan and associated capital improvement program (CIP) could then be updated based on the secondary clarifier performance and any updates to the anticipated nutrient removal regulations. This effort should then be repeated once the aeration upgrades included in the WWTP Critical Improvements Project are implemented. Prepared by: Ed Wicklein EW:dlt Appendix A CFD Modeling Results A-1 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 1. Secondary Clarifier 1 (or 2) with a Scraper-Type Mechanism, at 2040 Maximum Month Flow Conditions and MLSS = 3,500 mg/L Figure 1 shows the clarifier is at or near failure. Based on this, it was determined a scraper type mechanism would not provide sufficient sludge removal. A-2 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 2. Secondary Clarifier 1 (or 2) with a Suction-Type Mechanism and Concrete Fillets, at 2027 Peak Flow and Maximum Month Flow Conditions Figure 2 shows the clarifier performance is much better with a suction-type header and concrete fillets in the center and corners. It shows at a peak secondary process flow of 20 mgd and a RAS flow of 6.5 mgd, the MLSS concentration could be as high as 1,800 mg/L. A-3 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 3. Secondary Clarifier 1 (or 2) with a Suction-Type Mechanism, Concrete Fillets, and Increased RAS Pumping at 2027 Peak Flow and Maximum Month Flow Conditions Figure 3 shows at a peak secondary process flow of 20 mgd and a RAS flow of 13 mgd, the MLSS concentration could be as high as 2,200 mg/L. A-4 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 4. Secondary Clarifier 1 (or 2) with a Suction-Type Mechanism and Concrete Fillets, at 2027 Maximum Month Flow Conditions and MLSS = 2,800 mg/L Figure 4 shows implementing a suction-type mechanism and concrete fillets at the bottom and corners of SC-1 and SC-2 will provide improved sludge removal, compared to just adding a scraper-type mechanism. The image on the right shows the corner fillets appear to keep the sludge out of the corners in the area that is swept by the sludge withdrawal mechanism. The image on the left shows there is turbulence in the corner area. Flow traveling along the walls appears to reflect back into the tank at the corner where it meets inflow traveling outward. A-5 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 5. Sludge Blanket Depth with and without Corner Baffling Secondary Clarifier 1 (or 2) with a Suction-Type Mechanism and Concrete Fillets, at 2027 Maximum Month Flow Conditions and MLSS = 2,800 mg/L A baffle was tested at the inside corners of the effluent weir to reduce the turbulence. As shown in Figure 5, overall the baffle has a limited effect on sludge blanket height. Given the difficulty and cost of constructing a baffle, it was dropped from further consideration. A-6 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 6. Sludge Blanket Depth with and without Increased RAS Pumping Secondary Clarifier 1 (or 2) with a Suction-Type Mechanism and Concrete Fillets, at 2027 Maximum Month Flow Conditions and MLSS = 2,800 mg/L Figure 6 shows doubling the RAS pumping rate from 6.5 mgd to 13.0 mgd significantly lowers the sludge blanket depth, and thereby improves secondary clarifier performance. A-7 pw:\\Carollo/Documents\Client/CA/Veolia/10340A10/Deliverables/PM01\PM_FeasiibilityOfIncreasingSecondaryClarifierCapacity Figure 7. Sludge Blanket Depth with a Suction-Type Mechanism and Concrete Fillets, at Various Sludge Loading Rates (MLSS = 2,800 - 3,500 mg/L), and at Current and Future Maximum Month Flows (15.2 = 17.3 mgd) Figure 7, shows the secondary clarifier approaches failure when the MLSS concentration is increased to 3,500 mg/L. Operating at a high MLSS concentration (e.g., 3,000 mg/L - 3,500 mg/L) may be required in the future to provide nutrient removal, such as nitrification and denitrification. As a result, more clarifiers would likely be required to provide nutrient removal. Alternatively more aeration basins could be implemented to reduce the MLSS concentration required for nutrient removal. Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 11:54:54-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 09:32:29-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 09:32:37-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 09:32:47-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 09:32:59-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 13:19:01-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 13:19:11-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 13:19:22-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 13:19:34-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 10:37:50-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 10:38:02-07'00' Digitally signed by Crystal R. Starr Contact Info: Carollo Engineer, Inc Date: 2017.11.02 10:38:17-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 10:57:56-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 10:58:17-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 10:59:45-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 10:59:57-07'00' Digitally signed by Kathryn E. Rogers Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.02 10:52:26-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 13:34:42-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 13:34:23-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 13:34:08-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 13:33:49-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 13:33:23-07'00' DATEREV BY DESCRIPTION DATE CHECKED DRAWN DESIGNED 10340A.10 JOB NO. DRAWING NO. SHEET NO. SCALES ACCORDINGLY VERIFY SCALES THIS SHEET, ADJUST IF NOT ONE INCH ON BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING 0 1" OF 317OCTOBER 2017 VEOLIA WWTP CRITICAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A B C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A B C D E F G G ® No. 20740CONTROL DEVICESOPERATOR INTERFACE/FIELDPLC I/OCONTROL PANELSCADA/HMISECONDARY CLARIFIER NO. 1 CLR-1371 SECONDARY CLARIFIER NO. 1 1HP 480VAC 3PH 6 00NS06 CLR 1371 RAS A 13N09 13N12 EFFLUENT CHANNEL AERATION BASIN SCUM SOURCEPOWERKEY NOTES: CONTROL PANEL TO BE LOCATED IN GALLERY STRUCTURE. PRESERVED AND ADD FUNCTIONALITY AS SHOWN. ENSURE THE EXISTING FUNCTIONALITY AT THE HMI IS APPROPRIATE POINT. AND CONNECT THE NEW CLARIFIER CONTROL PANELS TO THE FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CLARIFIER I/O POINTS IN PLC SEC-TR2 1 3 2 3 MWH 1371 TSH 1371 XSHH 1371 TORQUE XSH 1371 TORQUE HAD 1371 ACTION HOA TAH 1371 ALARM KI 1371 NUM ETM Y2 1371 ALARM FAILED Y1 1371 STATUS RUNNING YR 1371 STATUS REMOTE HAE 1371 ACTION OO ZSC 1371 SHEAR PIN 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 CR5 1371 ALARM HIGH TORQUE CR2 1371 ALARM HIGH-HIGH TORQUE CR3 1371 ALARM SHEAR PIN 2 2 2 1 1 HSD 1371 HOA HSU 1371 E-STOP 1 1 1 CR5 1371 DI HIGH TORQUE CR3 1371 DI SHEAR PIN CR2 1371 DI HIGH-HIGH TORQUE LCP 1371 2 2 2 2 2 2 II 1371 NUM QIH 1371 SP IR 1371 TREND QIL 1371 SP IAH 1371 ALARM IAL 1371 ALARM MS 1371 DO OO AUX1 1371 DI RUNNING 1 I 1371 AI CURRENT HAE 1371 ACTION OO Y1 1371 STATUS RUNNING CR3 1371 ALARM SHEAR PIN CR2 1371 ALARM HIGH-HIGH TORQUE CR5 1371 ALARM HIGH TORQUE HAD 1371 ACTION HOA KI 1371 NUM ETM YR 1371 STATUS REMOTE Y2 1371 STATUS FAILED TAH 1371 ALARM II 1371 NUM QIH 1371 SP IAL 1371 ALARM IAH 1371 ALARM IR 1371 TREND QIL 1371 SP DRAWING 13N11CONTINUED ON PROJECT NO.LAST SAVED BY:FILE NAME: CAC MCG DSR 13N12 310 INSTRUMENTATION SECONDARY CLARIFIER NO. 1 P&ID 10340A1013N012.dwgbshepard10340A.10Plot Date: 02-NOV-2017 5:10:37 PMUser: bshepard Model: Layout1 ColorTable: gshade.ctb DesignScript: Carollo_Std_Pen_v0905.pen PlotScale: 24.000001:1Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.03 13:12:18-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 14:17:29-07'00' Digitally signed by Christopher Alan Carvalho Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Date: 2017.11.01 14:17:15-07'00' B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\BrittenMichael-2pg.docx Education BS Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1974 Licenses Civil Engineer, California Professional Affiliations Water Environment Federation American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association Michael J. Britten, P.E. Michael Britten is a senior vice president with Carollo Engineers and has 45 years of experience in master planning, design, and construction management of wastewater, water, and storm water facilities. Relevant Project Experience  Project manager for master planning, final design, and construction management services for the Sewer Authority Mid- Coastside, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant. The $17 million project included a 4- mgd secondary treatment expansion and new solids handling facilities.  Project manager for planning, permitting, and design services for the South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant Improvements. The $41 million project involved expanding the capacity from 9 to 13 mgd average dry weather flow and providing for wet weather treatment capacity of 62 mgd. Key elements included adding a 110-foot-diameter secondary clarifier, RAS pumping system, and bar screen for wet weather flow.  "Liquid Package" manager for the $1.4 billion San Jose Regional Wastewater Facility Capital Improvement Program. The liquid stream projects total $360 million in project costs. Major projects include aeration tank rehabilitation, blower rehabilitation, tertiary filters rehabilitation, secondary clarifier rehabilitation, and a new headworks facility. Responsible for contract management, technical oversight, and mentoring for the San Jose engineering staff.  Principal-in charge for preliminary and final design of the City of Turlock, California, Headworks and Secondary Treatment Capacity Expansion Phase 1. The project replaced an outdated headworks and expanded the nitrification capacity of the secondary treatment process.  Principal-in-charge/project manager for the City of Modesto, California, 14.9 mgd Biological Nutrient Removal/Tertiary Treatment Facility, which included two parallel membrane bioreactor facilities totaling $150 million. The effluent produced by the facility will be piped to the Delta Mendota Canal and utilized by agricultural customers that have seen drastic reductions in their water allocations.  Principal-in-charge for design of the Turlock Irrigation District, California, 1.2-MW fuel cell cogeneration system at the City of Turlock Water Reclamation Plant. The project involved preparation of grants, interconnection, permitting applications, and prepurchasing equipment.  Principal-in-charge for the City of Turlock, California, Tertiary Treatment Facilities design and construction management. The $50 million project included a 20-mgd tertiary treatment facility, new recycled water pump station, and six-mile outfall/irrigation pipeline to serve agricultural customers.  Principal-in-charge for the City of Burlingame, California, $8 million Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements. The project included replacement of the aeration system, new blowers, and a sludge dewatering building.  Principal-in-charge/project manager for the City of Turlock, California, Nitrification Facilities Design. The $8.1 million project involved evaluation of alternatives to expand the trickling filter/activated sludge process to permit nitrification. The plant will be expanded to 15.5 mgd by constructing two new aeration basins. The design converts three existing aeration basins from floating covers to fine bubble aeration and adds four new 400-hp centrifugal blowers to supply air to the existing aeration basins.  Project manager for design of the Union Sanitary District, California, $36 million Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade. The project increased plant capacity to 30 mgd and included activated sludge processes, an 88-foot-diameter anaerobic digester, and sludge thickening facilities. Responsible for obtaining State Revolving Fund loans, negotiating with Pacific Gas and Electric to relocate high voltage lines, and obtaining Michael J. Britten, P.E. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\BrittenMichael-2pg.docx permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.  Project manager for design of the North San Mateo County Sanitation District (City of Daly City), California, $16 million plant expansion. The project provides 2.8 MG of flow equalization storage basins and new primary sedimentation basins to expand the activated sludge plant from 8 to 10.3 mgd. The equalization basins also provide wet weather flow storage.  Project engineer for design of the East Bay Municipal Utility District, California, Main Wastewater Treatment Plant $5 million waste activated sludge thickening facility and modifications to the primary sedimen- tation basin influent channels and prechlo- rination system.  Project manager for the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, California, Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan, which encompasses a $1.8 billion capital improvement program for the collection system and wastewater treatment plant. Treatment plant improvements identified include replacement of the steam-driven aeration system with a new electric blower system and revamping of the entire solids handling facilities.  Project manager for design and construction management services for the East Bay Municipal Utility District, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant $24 million Wet Weather Storage Basin. The project included an 11-MG storage basin, 120-mgd flow diversion facilities, and 80-mgd submersible pump station.  Project manager for the City of South San Francisco, California, Wet Weather Program, which included an infiltration and inflow analysis and development of a capital improvement program for the collection system and main pump stations.  Principal-in-charge/project manager for the City of Modesto, California, Wastewater Master Plan for collection system and treatment/effluent disposal facilities. The City’s 20-year capital improvement plan includes $500 million in improvements.  Project manager for the City of Stockton, California, 55-mgd Regional Wastewater Control Facility Capital Improvement and Energy Management Plan. Developed a 5- year, $150 million capital improvement program.  Principal-in-charge/project manager for the City of Turlock, California, Recycled Water Feasibility Study. The study identified potential uses for recycled water, including groundwater recharge and crop irrigation, and developed required treatment facilities for a 20-mgd recycled plant.  Principal-in-charge for the City of Burlingame, California, Wastewater Treatment Facility Study. The study evaluated alternatives for upgrading and expanding the plant to accommodate wet weather flows. The study included a capacity evaluation and a reliability audit of the existing facilities.  Project manager for the Sewer Authority Mid-Coastside (SAM), California, Wet Weather Management Program. The project involved monitoring wet weather flows and rainfall in Half Moon Bay, El Granada, and Montara to evaluate the wet weather capacity of the intertie pipeline system. The intertie system conveys wastewater from these communities to the SAM treatment plant. Carollo prepared a facility plan that identified $8 million in capital improvements, which included wet weather storage basins, parallel force main, and increased capacity for a major pump station.  Project manager for the City of Fort Bragg, California, $9 million Water Source Development Project. The project studied the feasibility of installing a new river intake, raw water pumping station, raw water transmission pipelines, and 1,500-acre-foot reservoir. The project scope also included a recycled water feasibility study. The new facilities would allow Fort Bragg to eliminate river diversions in the dry season when flows are low and minimum fish bypass flows cannot be maintained. Pumping would occur only during the wet season and excess flow would be stored in the reservoir to satisfy summer demands. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\ParkerScott-2pg.docx Education MS Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1992 BS Civil Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 1991 Licenses Civil Engineer, California Professional Engineer, Hawaii Professional Affiliations California Water Environment Association Water Environment Federation American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Board Certified Scott E. Parker, P.E., BCEE Scott Parker, a senior vice president with Carollo Engineers, serves as the firm’s Chief Engineer. As Director, he leads the development and updates to all of Carollo’s engineering standards, including computer aided design, standard specifications, typical details, and cost estimating. He has completed a wide array of projects in planning, design, and construction of wastewater systems. Relevant Project Experience  Principal-in-charge/project manager for design and construction of the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, $10 million Headworks Replacement. The project included new metering, screening, and grit removal systems, as well as demolition of existing plant infrastructure to include the existing headworks, grit facilities, and an abandoned incineration building.  Principal-in-charge for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, Twin Peaks Booster Station and Water Line Replacement. The project included design of a booster station with three 875-gpm vertical turbine pumps, an emergency generator, and replacement of 10,000 feet of 12-inch water transmission pipeline. The waterline replacement consisted of provisions for bidding alternative construction techniques such as remove and replace, pipe bursting, and cured-in- place technologies.  Project engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, $9 million Sludge Handling and Odor Control Facilities. The project involved prepurchase of two centrifuges and design and construction of a dewatering building, liquid sludge storage facilities, cake conveyance and storage, remote sludge pumping, polymer addition, and odor control equipment.  Principal-in-charge for the City of Chico, California, $45 million Water Pollution Control Plant Expansion to 12 mgd, average day average month capacity. New facilities included headworks, aeration tanks, aeration blowers, secondary clarifier, RAS pump, primary sludge and scum thickening pumps, anaerobic digester and appurtenant facilities, centrifuge, cogeneration unit, standby generator, sludge storage and processing areas, and constructed wetlands for enhancement and effluent polishing.  Principal-in-charge/project manager for the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, California, $22 million Secondary Treatment Expansion, which includes conversion of an intermediate clarifier, integration of anoxic selectors into converted aeration basins, new secondary clarifiers, new RAS pump station, and odor control.  Project manager/engineer for design of the City of Chico, California, $33 million 9- mgd nitrification improvements. The project included headworks modifications, primary clarifiers, anaerobic digesters and control building, centrifuge dewatering building, chlorine contact basins, sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite disinfection, 48-inch outfall pipe, administration building, electrical and instrumentation upgrades, aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, RAS pumping, aeration blowers, and yard piping. Also responsible for development of the hydraulic model and process calculations.  Discipline engineer for the peak-flow, full-scale hydraulic testing and analysis of the City of Santa Rosa, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant secondary clarifiers.  Peer review for the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, California, RP-1 Liquids and Solids Recovery. The project involved design for rehabilitation of existing headworks and primary clarifiers, improvements to yard piping, aeration basin modification, and new fine screens, process blowers, solids thickening facility (using rotary drum thickeners), acid-phase digesters, odor control systems, and electrical service feed.  Project manager for the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, California, $11 million Primary Treatment Expansion. This expansion increased the primary treatment capacity of the existing plant by one-third, to an annual average dry weather flow of 23.7 mgd. The Scott E. Parker, P.E., BCEE B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\ParkerScott-2pg.docx project included design of a 95-foot- diameter circular clarifier; vortex grit removal basin; related sludge, scum, and grit pumping stations; grit handling facility; and grit basin influent flow channels fitted with Parshall flumes used for both flow measurement and flow splitting.  Principal-in-charge for the Union Sanitary District, California, Primary Digester No. 3 Rehabilitation and Solids System Capacity Assessment Report. Digester improvements included upgrades to the piping associated with pumped mixing, heating, sludge transfer, and digester gas systems, as well as concrete repairs and foam insulation replacement to address structural and safety deficiencies.  Principal-in-charge for the Union Sanitary District, California, High-Speed Aeration Blower Replacement. The project entailed demolition of existing positive displacement rotary lobe blowers and replacement with a high-speed, dual-core turbo blower and associated piping and electrical improvements.  Principal-in-charge for the Fairfield- Suisun Sewer District, California, Blower Replacement, which enhanced the reliability and efficiency of the secondary treatment process aeration system. The project involved a secondary treatment process evaluation of the activated sludge process, replacement of the 600-hp aeration blowers with new high-speed turbo blowers, aeration piping repairs, standby power generation, and electrical system upgrades.  Principal-in-charge for the Union Sanitary District, California, Alvarado Wastewater Treatment Plant Solids System/Capacity Assessment. The plant’s influent flows have been steadily decreasing while influent TSS and BOD mass loading rates have been increasing. This project involved an assessment of existing capacity and ways to increase solids treatment capacity, optimize solids processes, achieve energy neutrality, and produce Class A biosolids. An evaluation of potential regulatory changes was also included.  Project manager for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Flow Equalization Project (FEQ). This $129 million project added 110 MG of storage to existing basins to reduce peak flows to 330 mgd and provided mass excavation for future facilities. The project required 1,200,000 CY of excavation and more than 85,000 truck trips to remove excavated material from the site. FEQ includes two major pumping stations, concrete lining, washdown system, large fill/drain piping, and major effluent control structures.  Project manager for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment Project (NST). This $50 million project will use nitrifying sequencing batch reactors to reduce ammonia in the solids treatment system supernatant necessary to meet interim permit conditions. It will also produce nitrate-rich effluent for odor control. NST includes influent and effluent pumping and lime addition. The project was accelerated to save $1.1 million per year in avoided sodium hypochlorite costs.  Design manager for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Tertiary Treatment Facilities Project (TTF). This $400 million project will provide filtration and disinfection of secondary effluent to a level equivalent to Title 22 requirements for tertiary disinfected recycled water for unrestricted reuse. TTF includes a 330-mgd filter influent pump station, 217 mgd of granular media filters, backwash equalization and treatment, chemical feed systems, covered disinfection contact basin, and a new area control center.  Quality assurance/quality control for the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, New Mexico, Southside Water Reclamation Plant Solids Dewatering Facility Replacement. The existing facility did not provide reliable service, required significant maintenance, and was at the end of its useful life. The project involved preliminary design, Design Analysis Report, permits and site approvals, detailed design (including construction bid documents), and engineering services during construction. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\GutierrezRichard-2pg.docx Education MS Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, 2006 BS Civil Engineering, California State University, Fresno, 2004 Licenses Civil Engineer, California Certification 10-Hour Construction Safety and Health, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, California, 10/18/2007 Professional Affiliations California Water Environment Association Water Environment Federation American Water Works Association Hydraulic Institute Canvassing Committee Richard L. Gutierrez, P.E. Ricky Gutierrez joined Carollo Engineers in 2001 and has been involved in a broad range of projects, including planning, design, and construction of wastewater treatment facilities, water treatment facilities, pipelines (including trenchless technology evaluations), river outfalls and diffusers, and pump stations. His experience also includes research and evaluation of disinfection technologies such as UV, pasteurization, and ozone for water reuse projects. Relevant Project Experience  Design engineer and resident engineer during construction of the City of Chico, California, 12-mgd Water Pollution Control Plant Expansion. The project expanded the plant capacity from 9 mgd to 12 mgd and involved construction of a new headworks facility, grit basins, aeration tanks, secondary clarifier, digester, modifications to existing pump stations, and various other improvements. Responsible for design and engineering services during construction for aeration tanks, sludge drying beds, hydropneumatic plant water tank, primary effluent pump station modifications, thickened sludge pump station, yard piping, and civil site work. Also provided construction inspection, submittal review, responses to requests for information, coordination of construction progress meetings, field instructions and design clarifications, and review of change orders and as-built drawings.  Project engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, Process and Hydraulic Analysis. The project involved a process and hydraulic evaluation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant, focusing on the activated sludge unit process. District staff was interested in determining the near- term and possible long-term process needs in order to set appropriate priorities for future capital expenditures. Carollo’s analysis provided recommendations for meeting current and future peak plant flow demands and prioritized these capital improvements. The project also evaluated the performance and feasibility of alternative treatment configurations intended to optimize plant performance and improve hydraulic capacity.  Project manager for the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, California, Blower Replacement, which enhanced the reliability and efficiency of the secondary treatment process aeration system. The project consists of a secondary treatment process evaluation of the activated sludge process, replacement of the existing 600-hp aeration blowers with new high-speed turbo blowers, aeration piping repairs, and electrical system upgrades.  Project engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project $32 million Return Activated Sludge Pumping Project (RAS). RAS will replace existing return activated sludge pumps with new pumps designed to deliver the higher flow and head conditions required by the new biological nutrient removal process. RAS will have a capacity of over 200 mgd and includes 48 pumps located at 24 secondary sedimentation tanks. Carollo completed preliminary design of the system including hydraulic modeling, recommendations on pump selection, an electrical load study that recommends changes to the existing power distribution system, and an instrumentation and control systems review that recommends changes for improved control and monitoring. The design also incorporated replacement of the coarse bubble channel aeration system in the mixed liquor channels.  Engineering services during construction for the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, California, Secondary Treatment Expansion, which included modifications to several existing plant pump stations, conversion of existing aerobic digesters to aeration tanks, and a new return activated sludge pump station. Responsible for submittal review, responding to requests for information, and preparing design clarifications.  Project engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project $50 million Richard L. Gutierrez, P.E. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\GutierrezRichard-2pg.docx Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment Project (NST). NST will use nitrifying sequencing batch reactors to reduce ammonia in the solids treatment system supernatant necessary to meet interim permit conditions. It will also produce nitrate-rich effluent for odor control. NST includes influent and effluent pumping and lime addition. The project was accelerated to save $1.1 million per year in avoided sodium hypochlorite costs.  Project engineer providing final quality assurance/quality control review for the Union Sanitary District, California, High- Speed Aeration Blower Project. The project entailed demolition of existing positive displacement rotary lobe blowers and replacement with a high-speed, dual-core turbo blower and associated piping and electrical improvements.  Engineer for the City of Daly City, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant Feasibility Study for Tertiary Treatment Expansion. The project evaluated the feasibility of expanding the tertiary treatment facilities at the existing wastewater treatment plant and included an analysis of several disinfection and filtration technologies. The technologies evaluated included in-vessel UV systems, ozone disinfection systems, a pasteurization system, and microfiltration membrane systems. Responsible for analysis of disinfection and filtration technologies, site configuration and layout, cost analysis, development of design alternatives, and report preparation.  Engineer for the performance evaluation of the Quay Technologies limited low- pressure, high-output microwave generated UV system in Roseville, California. Testing was conducted in accordance with the National Water Research Institute/Water Research Foundation UV guidelines to receive conditional acceptance by California Department of Public Health to be used for Title 22 water recycling applications.  Engineer for the Rancho Murieta Community Services District, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant Operational Audit. The project consisted of a review of one year of operating data, review of previous engineering studies, site assessments, interview of operators, and preparation of an assessment report with recommendations on how to make the facility operate better and reduce the potential for future odor problems from the plant. Responsible for data review and report preparation.  Design engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase I Expansion and UV Design Assist projects. These projects included expansion of primary and secondary treatment facilities and conversion of the disinfection process from chlorine to UV. Responsible for site work design, stormwater calculations, hydraulic calculations, and coordination between discipline engineers.  Resident engineer for the City of Chico, California, Water Pollution Control Plant Outfall Replacement. The project consisted of construction of an 84-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipeline, 63-inch diameter HDPE pipe with diffusers installed in the Sacramento River using the float and sink method, junction structures, and outfall gate structure. Responsible for construction inspection, submittal review, responses to requests for information, construction progress meetings, preparation of field instructions/design clarifications, and review of change orders and as-built drawings.  Resident engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Chlorine Conversion to UV Disinfection construction. The project consisted of construction of a 45-mgd UV disinfection system capable of producing disinfected tertiary recycled water in accordance with Title 22, construction of an onsite sodium hypochlorite generation system to provide chlorine residual to the recycled water distribution system, and conversion of existing chlorine contact basins to recycled water storage tanks. Responsible for submittal review, responding to requests for information, preparing field instructions and design clarifications, reviewing as-built drawings, and construction inspection. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\WickleinEdward-2pg.docx Education MS Civil Engineering, Hydraulics, Washington State University, 2000 BS Civil Engineering, Washington State University, 1998 Licenses Civil Engineer, Washington, California, Florida Professional Affiliations Water Environment Federation American Water Works Association International Water Association Hydraulic Institute Edward A. Wicklein, P.E. Edward A. Wicklein has 21 years of experience in design and analysis of hydraulic facilities using numerical models. He has experience in all phases of modeling including code development, grid generation, flow analysis, and data visualization. He has conducted many computational fluid dynamic (CFD) studies of municipal and industrial water facilities. These projects have included pump intake modeling, reservoir modeling, raw water intake design and analysis, outfall design and analysis, modeling of junctions and flow splits, and detailed modeling of most of the major water and wastewater treatment components and processes. Relevant Project Experience  Project engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, Headworks Replacement. Assisted on a study to develop the preliminary hydraulic layout of a portion of the new headworks. CFD modeling was used to optimize flow split and velocity distribution in the channels between headworks screens, through vortex grit tanks, to Parshall flumes leading to primary clarifiers.  Project engineer for the Dallas Water Utilities, Texas, Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements. Evaluated inlet improvements for a 195-foot-diameter secondary clarifier. Modeling incorporated a custom density-coupled sedimentation model. A new target baffle design was developed with the model that better dissipated inlet energy and improved sedimentation in the large tanks.  Project engineer for the West County Sewer District, California, Secondary Clarifier Improvements. Facility planning determined that two of the clarifiers should have additional capacity. A custom solids transport model was used with the commercial CFD model to evaluate inlet baffle improvements to increase the sedimentation capacity of the existing tanks.  Project engineer for CFD modeling of Vallejo Sanitation and Flood Control District, California, Secondary Clarifiers. The District was considering potential inlet energy dissipation improvements. The CFD model, along with a custom sedimentation model, was used to evaluate performance improvements for a range of commercially available products, as well as some simple modifications.  Project engineer responsible for developing CFD models of secondary sedimentation distribution channel and basins for the West County Sewer District, California. Four rectangular secondary clarifiers were supplied by two aeration basins via a rectangular channel, in a symmetrical arrangement. Conducted modeling to find gate settings that balanced flow between the clarifiers and to determine the capacity of the two clarifier designs.  Project engineer responsible for developing a CFD model of a flow splitting structure for City of Daly City, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant. Flow from the aeration basins is combined in a well-up box, then divided between three secondary clarifiers via weirs. A 3D free-surface CFD model was used to ensure the geometry of the inflow piping did not lead to non- uniform flow split between the clarifiers.  Project engineer for development and analysis of a flow splitting structure CFD model as part of a wet weather treatment capacity upgrade for the Central Marin Sanitation Agency, California. The project involved expanding treatment capacity by adding treatment facilities. The existing flow distribution structure is symmetrical. Work included adding two clarifiers on one side, connected by an extension channel. At the proposed peak wet weather flow, the split between the clarifiers will be adjusted with gates at the clarifier entrances. The CFD model provided a basis for estimating the range of gate openings required to balance the flow between the clarifiers.  Project engineer responsible for CFD modeling for the City of Loveland, Colorado, secondary clarifiers. The City currently has three secondary center-feed clarifiers. Peak flows are projected to Edward A. Wicklein, P.E. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\WickleinEdward-2pg.docx increase 20 percent in the coming years. CFD modeling showed that the projected flow increase would likely lead to failure of the clarifiers as they were configured. The model was used to develop an improved inlet energy dissipation system that provided increased capacity within the existing tanks, thereby delaying the need for an additional tank.  Project engineer responsible for developing CFD models of the secondary clarifier flow splitting structure and secondary clarifiers for the City of Glendale, Arizona, Arrowhead Wastewater Treatment Plant. The flow splitting structure had an asymmetric weir arrangement, leading to unbalanced clarifier flows. The model was used to find weir settings that would lead to balanced flows at peak conditions. The plant has two styles of rectangular clarifiers. The newer ones have higher effluent suspended solids than the original set. CFD modeling was used to find the cause of the difference and develop baffling improvements to improve sedimentation in the newer clarifiers.  Project engineer responsible for developing a CFD model of the Secondary Clarifiers at the City of Longmont, Colorado, Wastewater Treatment Plant. The model was used to develop improvements to increase the capacity of the existing clarifier, allowing the City to postpone construction of a second clarifier.  Project engineer responsible for developing a CFD model of a secondary clarifier flow splitter structure for the City of Everett, Washington. The city currently has two secondary clarifiers. Flow is split between them in a structure designed to supply up to four clarifiers. A third clarifier is being added, which will create a non- symmetrical arrangement. A free-surface CFD model was used to evaluate weir settings and other improvements to create balanced flow at a range of conditions.  Project engineer responsible for developing and implementing a density coupled sedimentation model to estimate the performance of proposed clarifiers for the Seonam Water Reclamation Plant in Seoul, South Korea. The rectangular secondary clarifiers were highly loaded and utilized lamella plates to aid in sedimentation. The model was also used to evaluate the impact of baffling on sedimentation.  Project engineer responsible for CFD modeling of wet weather treatment headworks for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, California. The CFD model was used to evaluate bar screen channel alternative configurations that would work in the available space. Modeling was also performed to optimize the configuration of the channels approaching the vortex grit tanks and provide balanced and uniform flow conditions.  Project engineer responsible for CFD modeling of the Plant 1 headworks for the Orange County Sanitation District, California. Two models were developed, one of the pump station and one of the grit tanks. The pump station model was used to investigate options to increase the peak flow from 280 mgd to 320 mgd reusing as much of the existing wet pit/dry pit infrastructure as practical. A model was also develop of the existing aerated grit tanks to evaluate options to similarly increase capacity, as well as generally increase performance. The model included grit particle tracking bases on field grit measurements to quantify performance and compare geometric changes.  Project engineer responsible for CFD modeling of the open channel UV system hydraulics for the City of Lodi, California. The existing UV equipment was due for a complete lamp replacement. The study evaluated the potential for equipment upgrade, as well as evaluated the current system hydraulics to determine if minor improvements to the facility configuration could improve system efficiently. The model showed that the high headloss flow distribution baffle did not do a very good job of creating uniform flow conditions at the first lamp bank, and instead a lower head loss baffle and turning vanes would provide better hydraulics for the UV system. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\DadikMike-2pg.docx Education BS Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1996 Licenses Civil Engineer, California Structural Engineer, California, Nevada, Hawaii Civil/Structural Engineer, Washington, Oregon Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Chi Epsilon (National Civil Engineering Honor Society) Engineers Without Borders, Technical Advisory Committee Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Tau Beta Pi (National Engineering Honor Society) NACE International Society for Protective Coatings, Northern California Chapter Steering Committee Governor's Office of Emergency Services, ATC-20 Trained Responder Mike E. Dadik, P.E., S.E. Mike Dadik has 28 years of experience in structural design of water, wastewater, and civil engineering projects. He has overseen the structural design of numerous projects ranging from water and wastewater treatment plant construction and expansion to pump station seismic retrofits. Mike has extensive experience in rehabilitation and seismic vulnerability assessments. He has extensive experience in coating and corrosion control and is Carollo’s coating specialist responsible for maintenance of our coatings and finishes specifications. Relevant Project Experience  Structural engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, $9 million Sludge Handling and Odor Control Facilities. The new 7,400-square-foot masonry building houses new centrifuges and sludge handling equipment, and a new steel tank was constructed for sludge storage.  Structural engineer for the South Tahoe Public Utility District, California, $10 million Headworks Replacement. The project consists of new metering, screening, and grit removal systems in a new two-story, 4,500-square-foot, cast-in-place concrete and masonry building. Innovative approaches were utilized to mitigate the corrosive environment and maintain separation between building classification occupancies.  Structural engineer for preliminary and final design of the City of Turlock, California, Headworks and Secondary Treatment Capacity Expansion Phase 1. The expansion replaced an outdated headworks and pump station and provided additional influent pumping capacity to handle future flows.  Structural engineer for assessment and preliminary/final design of the Union Sanitary District, California, Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation. The project involved concrete repair, seismic upgrades, and replacement of four primary clarifier mechanisms, which are housed in a 14,400-square-foot facility. Two clarifiers had to remain in service during construction, which complicated construction sequencing and cost estimating.  Structural engineer for preliminary and final design of the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, California, $22 million Secondary Treatment Expansion, which involved design of an intermediate clarifier, influent pump station, biofilter, aeration basin retrofits, two secondary clarifiers, new RAS pump station, and odor control.  Structural engineer for preliminary and final design of the City of San Leandro, California, Water Pollution Control Plant Rehabilitation to restore the plant to its permitted capacity of 7.6 mgd with various facility improvements and addition of new facilities. Major work included construction of a new headworks and influent pump station, circular primary clarifier, primary effluent flow equalization facilities, and covered, fixed film reactor with associated lift station and biofilter facility.  Project manager for the Primary Clarifier Inspection for Delta Diablo Sanitation District, California. The project included visual inspection of the plant's primary clarifier concrete slab and walkway and recommendations for repair.  Structural engineer for the Delta Diablo Sanitation District, California, Primary Clarifier Improvements. Responsible for design of concrete and coating repair of the clarifiers and primary sludge pump station.  Structural engineer for preliminary and final design of the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, California, $11 million Primary Treatment Expansion. Work involved design of a new circular primary clarifier, vortex grit basin, primary sludge and scum pump stations, biofilter, and electrical building.  Structural engineer for the City of Modesto, California, new $120 million Phase 2 Biological Nutrient Removal/Tertiary Treatment Facility. The project involved preliminary and final design of new 12.6- mgd aeration basins and membrane bioreactors (MBR), enclosed UV disinfection system, large bridge crane structure, and masonry buildings. Site preparation Mike E. Dadik, P.E., S.E. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\DadikMike-2pg.docx required mitigation of soft soils including soil modification and development of cost- effective, below-grade piping connections. Was structural engineer of record leading a team of five structural design engineers. Designed the aeration basins and MBR structures.  Structural engineer for the City of Modesto, California, $20 million Phase 1A Treatment Plant Expansion. The project involved design of a new 1.2-mgd oxidation ditch and membrane bioreactors, UV disinfection system, bridge crane structure, and several masonry buildings.  Structural engineer for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, California, Southeast Plant SEP 020 Headworks. The new headworks will improve the treatment efficiency of screening and grit removal, while maximizing the control of odors. The 250-mgd replacement headworks includes influent diversion, bar screens, screenings handling, grit basins and handling, primary flow splitting, odor control scrubbers, and an electrical building.  Structural engineer for the City of Woodland, California, Aeration Retrofit. The City’s wastewater treatment plant is rated for 10.4 mgd, but has insufficient aeration capacity for the rated flow. In addition, the plant is expected to have nitrate limits in the future; therefore, process modifications are needed. Designed improvements to increase aeration capacity and convert the oxidation ditch process to a Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) configuration. Improvements included replacing brush rotors in the oxidation ditch with more energy efficient diffused air and fine bubble aeration and partitioning the oxidation ditch and adding necessary mixers and internal pumping to convert to the MLE process, which will further reduce energy demands.  Project manager/structural engineer for the Delta Diablo Sanitation District, California, Primary Influent Pipeline and Grit Chambers Repairs. The project involved rehabilitation of 140 feet of 42-inch primary influent piping using the CIPP method, repair of damaged concrete at the aerated grit chambers, and application of protective coatings over damaged concrete surfaces. Unique aspects of this fast-track project included detailed construction sequencing and bypass pumping planning to enable rehabilitation of the pipeline and channels while maintaining reliable plant operations.  Structural engineer for design and construction of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation $35 million Deuel Vocational Institution new wastewater treatment plant. The new membrane bioreactor facility had below-grade cast-in- place concrete tanks and above-grade masonry and steel buildings. Challenges included extensive site work to raise the buildings above the flood level and mitigate uplift potential for below-grade tanks.  Structural engineer for the City of San Jose, California, San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Headworks Condition Assessment. The project involved a detailed condition assessment of the original influent pumping, screening, and pretreatment facilities by a multidisciplinary team (structural, mechanical, process, electrical, and instrumentation). Input from the condition assessment was used to estimate replacement costs and timing for keeping the original headworks in use until 2040. Efforts tied into a parallel analysis on the costs and timing for expanding the new headworks facilities if the City chose to decommission the original headworks.  Structural engineer for the Delta Diablo Sanitation District, California, Secondary Solids Thickening Design, which involves evaluation and design of a new 2-meter gravity belt thickener to be located within the plant’s existing abandoned DAF Tank No. 3. A new open canopy structure is provided to house the existing and new gravity belt thickeners.  Project manager for the City of Palo Alto, California, Regional Water Quality Control Plant Repair and Retrofit. The project involved design to rehabilitate aging plant facilities through two construction projects, assessment of the structural integrity of the foundations of the operations and solids incineration buildings, and additional minor facility assessments. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\RobinsonDaniel-2pg.docx Education BS Mechanical Engineering Technology, California State University, Sacramento, 2000 Licenses Electrical Engineer, California Daniel S. Robinson, P.E. Daniel Robinson has 20 years of electrical and control systems experience in the water and wastewater industry. He is proficient in 480VAC electrical distribution systems; variable frequency drives (VFDs), reduced voltage soft starter (RVSS), and full-voltage (FV) motor control design; supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), programmable logic controller (PLC) and industrial control panel design; control system architecture; serial, Ethernet, and radio communication; process instrumentation; water/wastewater treatment processes; project management; UL, NEC, NEMA, and NFPA 70E requirements; and relay and ladder logic. Daniel’s primary responsibilities have included design of switchgear, motor control centers (MCCs), PLC panels, and instrumentation, control, and communication systems; creation of interconnection diagrams for power and control wiring between project equipment; creations of input/output (I/O) lists, loop diagrams, training documents, and factory and field test documentation; and development of control system descriptions, and operations and maintenance (O&M) manuals. Relevant Project Experience  Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager for the City of Hughson, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, which included main lift station, headworks, oxidation ditch, and secondary clarifier. The project also included a 480V utility metering switchboard with automatic transfer switch, surge protective device, and power monitor; MCCs with VFDs, active harmonic filter, RVSS, and reversing and non-reversing starters; control panels with Allen-Bradley ControlLogix PLCs, Ethernet, fiber optic, and radio communications to a new SCADA system; field instrumentation with flow, level, pressure, dissolved oxygen, and total suspended solids monitoring; coordination of intrinsically safe requirements; and loop diagrams, uninterruptible power supply load calculations, testing, and training.  Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager for the City of Reno, Nevada, Reno/Stead Water Reclamation Facility Expansion, which included headworks, oxidation ditch, aeration basin, secondary clarifier, tertiary filters, chlorine contact basin, and effluent structure. The project also included 15KV main switchgear, 5KV switchgear with automatic transfer switch and power distribution, 480V power distribution with surge protective device and power monitors; MCCs with 18-pulse VFDs, 6-pulse VFDs, and non-reversing starters with electronic overload and smart relay controls; control panels with Modicon Quantum PLCs and Modicon HMI; MB+ fiber optic ring communications to a new SCADA system; field instrumentation with flow, level, pressure, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential, and hazardous gas monitoring; coordination of intrinsically safe requirements; and power, control, and communication interconnection diagrams, testing, training, and final documentation.  Instrumentation and controls engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Return Activated Sludge Pumping Project (RAS). This $32 million project will replace existing return activated sludge pumps with new pumps designed to deliver higher flow and head conditions required by the new biological nutrient removal process. The RAS pumping system has a capacity greater than 200 mgd and includes 48 pumps located at 24 secondary sedimentation tanks. Preliminary design included hydraulic modeling, pump selection recommendations, electrical load study that recommended changes to the existing power distribution system, and instrumentation and control systems review that recommended changes for improved control and monitoring.  Electrical/instrumentation engineer for design and engineering services during construction for the City of San Mateo, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant Process Control System Upgrade and Collection System SCADA Integration. The project involved replacement of most of PLC control panels in the plant with an Daniel S. Robinson, P.E. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\RobinsonDaniel-2pg.docx Allen-Bradley ControlLogix PLC system, replacement of the SCADA system with a new SCADA system that includes remote view nodes located in all of the major process areas of the plant, and installation of a fiber optic backbone communication network extending the PLC network, SCADA network, and business network throughout the entire plant. Installation of the control system was done in phases with complex sequencing to reduce facility downtime and ongoing City and contractor coordination.  Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager/supervisor for the National Park Service EI Portal Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade in Yosemite National Park, California. The project involved design services, construction, and field installation to rebuild the main control and filter control panels, fiber optic communications, and a new SCADA system. Tasks included field investigations, design proposals, and cost estimates; coordination meetings to facilitate detailed design documentation including field installation of components into existing enclosures, PLC I/O and control interface schematics, and communication and conduit routing diagrams; construction of new control, communication, and SCADA systems; coordination of shutdown and cutover procedures, field installation, and startup; and testing and training.  Electrical/instrumentation engineer for Clean Water Services, Rock Creek Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Gravity Thickeners. The project involved constructing four new gravity thickeners in an operating plant and included a major 480V ductbank relocation; addition of MCC sections for VFD and FV motor controls, addition of a control panel with an Allen- Bradley ControlLogix PLC and integration into the plant SCADA, and instrumentation for flow, level, pressure, and temperature. The project also included modifications to solids processes and systems with complex sequencing of installation and startup so as not to interrupt treatment plant operations.  Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager for the Placer County Water Agency, California, Bella Tuscany Pipeline and Tank, which included a solar powered tank control panel and turnout control panel. The tank control panel has a solar load controller, battery controller, 120VAC inverter, and solar array meeting NEC 690 requirements. The turnout control panel has controls for a pressure control valve with flow calculation capabilities and a PLC with leased line modem communications; motor controls for an irrigation pump and power distribution for the cathodic protection system; control panels with Allen-Bradley ControlLogix PLCs and Allen-Bradley HMI; radio and CSU/DSU communications with modifications to the existing SCADA system; solar, battery, uninterruptible power supply, and inverter load and runtime, seismic, and wind load calculations; and power, control, and communication interconnection diagrams, testing, and training.  Electrical/instrumentation and controls manager/supervisor for the City of West Sacramento, California, Lift Stations Upgrade, which involved rehabilitation of 11 sewer lift stations and installation of a new SCADA system. The project included 480V and 240V utility switchboards with automatic transfer switch, surge protective device, and power monitors; MCCs with VFDs and RVSS motor controls; control panels with TESCO L2000 PLCs and Ethernet radio communications to a new RSView SCADA system; field instrumentation including flow, level, pressure, O2 and H2S gas monitoring; coordination of intrinsically safe requirements; and power, control, and communication interconnection diagrams, testing, training, and final documentation.  Electrical/instrumentation engineer for the City of Martinez, California, Electrical Power Distribution Upgrades. The project involved replacement of major electrical distribution equipment, including PG&E main service transformer and associated service conductors on the transformer secondary, main switchboard, four in-plant MCCs, 100-kVA transformer, and feeder conductors and conduit between the main switchboard and downstream MCCs and equipment. The project also included implementation of a load-shedding scheme and complex sequencing to reduce facility downtime and ongoing. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\McGrathEric-2pg.docx Education BS Civil Engineering, University of Utah, 1987 Licenses Civil Engineer, California, Nevada Eric T. McGrath, P.E. Eric McGrath is a civil engineer with more than 32 years of experience that includes management of construction plan and specification development for a variety of water and wastewater civil engineering projects. Relevant Project Experience  Project manager for the Washoe County, Nevada, Collection System Flow Monitoring, Hydraulic Modeling, and Arsenic Identification Plan. Responsible for coordinating project execution and subconsultant activities for flow and water quality investigation of the South Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility and Spanish Springs service areas. A detailed analysis of storm impacts, infiltration, and inflow in the identified services areas was necessary to address current flow and water quality issues and to ensure adequate conveyance capacity is available as new growth occurs in Washoe County.  Project engineer for the City of Riverside, California, Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan Update. The update involved flow monitoring, flow and process modeling, condition assessment, Waste Discharge Requirements GAP Analysis, and development of a capital improvement plan for the collection system. Developed flow allocations for computer modeling flow simulations.  Project engineer for the Contra Costa Water District, California, Treated Water Renewal and Replacement Study Update Asset Management Plan. Developed planning level cost estimates for water system improvement projects.  Project manager for the City of Millbrae, California, Madrone Pump Station Rehabilitation and Preliminary Design.  Project manager for the County of Washoe, Nevada, Pleasant Valley Interceptor 3 Predesign. Coordinated project execution and subconsultant activities for preliminary design and 30- percent cost estimates for two alternatives recommended in the alternatives study.  Staff engineer for the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, California, Collection System Master Plan. Developed planning level cost estimates for wastewater collection system improvement projects.  Quality manager for the Barrick Gold Corporation’s Cortez Hills Water Management Plan Delivery and Disposal Detailed Design in Elko, Nevada. Responsible for construction plan and specification review for pump station and conveyance pipeline design.  Quality manager for the Barrick Gold Corporation’s Water Management Portfolio Studies in Elko, Nevada. Responsible for review of pump station and conveyance pipeline design concepts.  Design manager/construction manager for the Poggemeyer Design Group, Inc. in Reno, Nevada, from 2009-2016. Served as design manager for Poggemeyer Design Group (planning/design parent firm) and construction manager for its subsidiary construction management group, CMWorks. Responsibilities primarily included management of construction plan and specification development for a variety of civil engineering project types. Also served as water/wastewater planning and design lead for the western U.S. Region. Representative projects include:  Apex Wastewater Collection System, City of North Las Vegas, Nevada.  San Clemente Island Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water System, U.S. Navy, California.  Paradise Hills Pressure Zone Conversion, City of Henderson, Nevada.  Weber Dam Modifications Phases 2 and 3, Bureau of Indian Affairs/Walker River Paiute Tribe, Nevada.  While with the Poggemeyer Design Group, served as Profit Center Managing Leader co-leading with the Profit Center Practice Leader an engineering group of 29 employees. Primary responsibility was financial performance of the engineering Eric T. McGrath, P.E. B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\STPUD\SecClarifierRehab\Prop0719\Resumes\McGrathEric-2pg.docx design group, including managing budgets, monitoring work in progress, optimizing labor utilization, and other responsibilities to ensure profitability. Additional responsibilities included business development of water and wastewater clients and project management of water and wastewater projects. Representative projects include:  Export Sewer Pump Station Master Plan, North Tahoe Public Utility District, California.  Recycled Water Facilities Master Plan, South Tahoe Public Utility District, California.  North Virginia Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Phase 1, City of Reno Department of Public Works, Nevada.  Branch manager for AMEC Infrastructure, Inc. in Reno, Nevada from 2003-2005. Managed the Reno office, which included approximately 15 people. Responsible for all office objectives and operations, including profitability, business development, personnel management, and project execution. Representative projects include:  North Spanish Springs Floodplain Detention Facility, Washoe County Department of Water Resources, Nevada.  High Desert State Prison Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements, Nevada State Public Works Board, Nevada.  Water Treatment Plant Study, Kingsbury General Improvement District, Nevada.  Reclaimed Water System Improvements, City of Sparks, Nevada.  Project manager for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants in Reno, Nevada from 1995- 2003. Hired as a project engineer and was soon promoted to project manager. Managed multi-engineering discipline projects primarily in municipal water and wastewater. Assisted in office management duties and business development activities. Representative projects include:  Susanville Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, Susanville Consolidated Sanitary District, California.  Cold Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Planning, Washoe County Department of Water Resources, Nevada.  Ely Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, City of Ely, Nevada.  Supervisor for the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power from 1987- 1995. For the first two, years served as a construction inspector on large water system projects. For the second two years, served as project engineer performing civil and structural engineering design. For the final four years, supervised an engineering design group consisting of two engineers, two surveyors, and a drafter. Representative projects include:  Bishop Fuel Facility for fleet vehicles.  Haiwee Reservoir Improvements, which included modifications necessary for reduced maximum storage level.  Los Angeles Reservoir Pump Station, which was a large 200-cfs pump station.  Maclay Tanks, which were twin 10- million-gallon pre-stressed concrete tanks. KEVIN A. HEENEY, PLS Vice President California Licensed Land Surveyor, P.L.S. 5914 For 43 years, Kevin has been involved with various aspects of the surveying and mapping profession. He has been licensed since 1988 and practicing in the Greater Sacramento region. Previous work experience has provided him the opportunity to successfully complete surveying and mapping projects throughout the State of California. As a Principal Surveyor, Kevin draws on this experience, his knowledge of technologies and his project management skills to ensure that projects are successfully completed, on time and on budget. KEY PROJECTS EXPERIENCE PUBLIC WORKS/WATER-WASTEWATER SPA Recycled Water Project, SRCSD EchoWater Project, SRCSD San Mateo WWTP 20 Year Master Plan California Men’s Colony UV Disinfection Design Project Lower Northwest Interceptor: 17.1 mile sewer interceptor and structures; mapping, right of ways, monitoring and construction layout. South Interceptor-Mather Interceptor: 11 mile sewer interceptor; topographic mapping and right of ways Deuel Vocational Institute: Wastewater Treatment Plant Modifications; mapping and Due Diligence documents Sacramento River/Fairbairn Wastewater Treatment Plants: Rehabilitation projects; topographic mapping PUBLIC WORKS/LEVEES Feather River, Yuba County: 13.5 miles of new levee construction and reinforcement; land net and right of ways Bear River, Yuba County: 2.5 miles of levee reinforcement and improvements; land net and right of ways Yuba River, Yuba County: 5.5 miles of levee reinforcement and improvements; land net and right of ways West Sacramento/Yolo Basin Wetlands: Yolo Bypass, Tisdale Weir, American River and Sacramento River sites; topographic mapping, soundings, cross sections and structure details. PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION SR 88 Pine Grove, CA: Aerial survey control, topographic design surveys, land net/base mapping SR12-SR26 Valley Springs, CA: topographic surveys, land net and right of ways Silver Dove Way, Morrison Road & Tierra De Dios: 1.4 miles of roadway; land net and right of ways Maybert Bridge Replacement Project: Topographic mapping, land net and right of ways McKinley Avenue Bridge: hydrological cross sections LAND DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISIONS Valley View, El Dorado County, CA: 2,000 unit single family project Euer Ranch, El Dorado County, CA: 461 unit single family project Laguna Mirage, Sacramento, CA: 153 unit cluster home project Carson Creek Ranch, El Dorado County, CA: 1,700 unit single family/senior project Town Center East and West, El Dorado Hills, CA: Commercial, retail and office development. La Crescenta Condominiums, Cameron Park, CA: Condominium conversion project Pearl Place Condominiums, Shingle Springs, CA: Condominium project ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS University of California, Merced Campus: 10,000+ acres including topographic surveys, Record of Survey and exhibits. Von Housen Mercedes Benz, Sacramento, CA: Auto dealership and adjacent office building Residence Inn, Rancho Cordova, CA: Hotel site and off-site easement documentation Rocklin Pointe, Rocklin, CA: Shopping center Anderson Marketplace, Anderson, CA: Shopping center SPECIAL PROJECTS Young vs. Lungren: Expert witness consultation related to easement litigation Nixon vs. Snoke: Forensic surveys related to accident litigation Tule River Indian Reservation: Establishment of geodetic control for future projects EDUCATION California State University, Chico, California - Engineering, Industry and Technology - 1973-1975 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Surveyors, Architects, Geologist and Engineers (SAGE) of El Dorado County California Land Surveyor’s Association “Protecting the infrastructure through innovative Corrosion Engineering Solutions” SUMMARY Over thirty-five (35) years of experience in all phases of corrosion projects including design engineering, manufacturing, research and development, construction inspection services, construction management, sales and marketing and litigation expert witness. Have successfully worked with clients in the fields of aerospace, marine, petroleum, chemical, mining and minerals, water and wastewater treatment and transmission, electric power industry, transportation systems, municipalities and state and federal government agencies. Established a proven track record for the ability to manage and direct complex research and design projects, requiring the coordination of strict budgets and demanding schedules with engineering staff and project teams. Special areas of expertise include cathodic protection design, installation, monitoring, troubleshooting, surveying, adjusting and repairing for underground pipelines, pile supported structures, seawalls, retaining structures, marine vessels, storage tanks, condenser water boxes, cooling water lines, intake structures, traveling screens and water wells . Additional expertise in condition assessments of water/wastewater treat- ment facilities and the diagnosis of internal and external corrosion problems associat- ed with copper piping systems such as thermogalvanic corrosion, high temperature corrosion, velocity related corrosion and corrosion related to cold water pitting phe- nomena, failure analysis of building plumbing systems, conducting soil corrosivity stud- ies, expert witness for litigation support. PUBLICATIONS & SEMINARS ► Ali, M. & Howard Jr., J.D. Corrosion Investigation of Steel H-Piles. NACE Corrosion Conference 1990. ► California State Water Resources Control Board, Seminars throughout state, “Corrosion and Corrosion Control for Underground Storage Tanks ”, 1994-1995. ► Cal/Nev Section of AWWA, Fall Conference, 1994-1995, “Corrosion Control for Water Wells”. ► San Francisco Bay Area NACE Conference, August, 1996, “Corrosion Concerns of the Water Industry”. ► California Water Environment Association, Northern Regional Conference, Sept., 1996, “Metal Selection and Corrosion Control for Water and Soil Environments ”. ► American Society of Civil Engineers, Bay Area Geotechnical Committee, April 1999, “Guidelines for Soil Corrosivity Testing and Laboratory Analysis ”. ► East Bay Engineers Society, Fairfield, CA, Spring 2004 “What All Civil Engineers Should Know About Corrosion and Corrosion Control”. ► NACE Western Area Conference, Oct. 2008 “How to Conduct an Evaluation of Asbestos-Cement Pipe”. ► NACE Western Area Conference, Oct. 2008 “Case Study of Prestressed Precast Concrete Pile Failures”. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science – Civil/Structural Engineering, University of Florida MBA Courses (2 years) - Northern Illinois University REGISTRATIONS ► Registered Professional Civil Engineer, CA (C44435) ► Registered Professional Corrosion Engineer, CA (CR1055) ► Registered Professional Civil Engineer, NV (019295) ► Registered Professional Engineer, IL (inactive) EXPERIENCE President/Owner JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. Concord, CA 1995 – Present District Manager Corrpro Companies Hayward, CA 1992 – 1995 President Corrosion Engineering & Research Co. Concord, CA 1987 – 1992 Design/Project Engineer Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Oakbrook, IL & San Francisco, CA 1977 – 1985 “Protecting the infrastructure through innovative Corrosion Engineering Solutions” (Continued) RELEVANT CONDITION ASSESSMENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project Name Agency Brief Description of Project Scope of Work Concrete Condition Assessment of Head- works Delta Diablo Sanita- tion District Conducted an inspection of the Screen Channel No. 1, Influent Pipe from MH-1 and Grit Chamber Pump Room at the main wastewater treatment facility located in Antioch, CA. Condition Assessment Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Main Wastewater Treatment Plant CCCSD Conduct a condition assessment of the following structures: Influent diversion struture Headworks metallic equipment Pre-aeration tank #1 & #2 Primary Sedimentation Tanks #1, #2 & #3 Distribution channels north and south 60-inch Primary effluent pipeline and associated structures OC Building Facade 72-inch PE Pipeline Secondary Clarifiers North Nos. 1 - 4 Secondary Clarifiers South Nos. 1 – 4 Aeration Basin #2 AB Wet Well No. 2 Five Wet Wells at Pump Stations South Tahoe PUD Performed an on-site corrosion evaluation of the subject rein- forced wet wells for the purpose of assessing the extent and degree of any deterioration of the structures in order to determine the current condition of the structures as well as if repair work was warranted. We inspected both the wet side and dry side of the pump station. Arden Pump Station Regional San A condition assessment of the wet well was performed on all of the wet well including influent channels, sluice gates, hand rails, concrete walls, manholes, and various appurtenances. San Mateo Wastewater Treatment Plant City of San Mateo Performed a condition assessment of the reinforced concrete that is exposed to wastewater in the Influent J-Box and provided rec- ommendations for remedial repair work based on findings. Thickeners Nos. 1 & 2 USD Inspected the interior of both thickeners and made recommenda- tions for repair and recoating the thickeners Force Main Sewer Authority Mid- Coastside Conducted a condition assessment of a force main for SAMC. This assessment included an excavation and inspection of the Force Main. Force Main Rodeo Sanitary Dis- trict Conducted a condition assessment of a force main for RSD. This assessment included an excavation and inspection of the Force Main. Condition Assessment 33-inch & 39-inch Di- ameter Sewer Force Mains USD Conducted a condition assessment of 66,700 feet of 33-inch and 39-inch diameter force mains owned and operated by Union San- itary District. These force mains were installed in 1982 and they convey raw wastewater from the Irvington Pump Station to the Newark Pump Station and on to the Alvarado Wastewater Treat- ment Plant in Union City, CA.