AP 06-02-05SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
"Basic Services for a Complex World"
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA
Thursday, June 2, 2005
2:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
1900 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe, California
Richard Solbri~, General Manager
Eric W. Schafer, President
BOARD MEMBERS
Paul Sciuto, Assistant Manager
I ·
Duane Wallace, Vice President
James R. Jones, Director Mary Lou Mosbacher, Director Tom Comte, Director
I II III II Ii I I IIII II I Il I II I I ! I I I
1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
m
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (Short non-agenda items that are within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the District. Five-minute limit. No action will be taken.)
3, CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR
ADOPTION,, OF CONSENT CALENDAR (Any item can be discussed and considered separately
upon request.)
5. CONSENT ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR ACTION I DISCUSSION
6. ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION
Sewer Lateral Position Paper
(Lisa Coyner)
Review Position Paper and Direct
Staff Regarding Potential Changes
to Ordinance
bo
B-Line Phase 3: Export Pipeline Replace-
ment - Administrative Civil Liability
(Paul Sciuto / Richard Solbdg)
Approve Payment of Administrative
Civil Liability from Lahontan
Regional Water Quality Control
Board in the Amount of $70,000
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - JUNE 2, 2005
Reserve Policy
(Rhonda McFarlane)
PAGE- 2
Adopt Resolution No. 2801 to
Update the District's Reserve Policy
Superseding Resolution No. 2785-04
in its Entirety
College Well License Agreement
(Rick Hydrick)
Direct Staff to Exercise Option to
Option to Extend License Agreement
an Additional Twenty-five Years
Payment of Claims
Approve Payment in the Amount of
$1,664,715.46
BOARD MEMBER STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
Executive Committee (Schafer / Wallace)
Finance Committee (Wallace I Schafer)
Water & Wastewater Operations Committee (Jones / Comte)
Planning Committee (Mosbacher / Schafer)
BOARD MEMBER AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Building Ad Hoc Committee (Mosbacher / Jones)
b. Lukins Water System Ad Hoc Committee (Wallace / Comte)
9. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
10. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE REPORT
11.
12.
13.
14.
GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS
STAFF REPORTS
NOTICE OF PAST AND FUTURE MEETINGS I EVENTS
Past Meetinfls I Events
05~24~05 - Planning Committee Meeting
05/31105 - Operations Committee Meeting
06102/05 - Executive Committee Meeting
06~02~05 - Board Workshop re: Strategic Plan
Future Meetings I Events
06/07/05 - 9:00 a.m. - Alpine County Supervisors Regular Meeting in Markleeville
06~07/05 - 9:00 a.m. - City Council Regular Meeting at Council Chambers
06~08~05 - 9:00 a.m. - El Dorado County Water Agency Regular Mtg. in Shingle Springs
06/16105 - 2:00 p.m. - STPUD Regular Board Meeting at City Council Chambers
06/21/05 - 8:00 a.m. - ECC (Employee Communications Committee Meeting) at District
(Director Jones is Board representative)
CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Anticipated Litigation (Two Cases)
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - JUNE 21 2005 PAGE - 3
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Existing Litigation: STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land in Alpine County, California;
et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento
Division, Case No. CIV S-02-0238 MCE JFM
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Anticipated Litigation: Pioneer Trail Waterline Replacement Near Filter Plant
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Existing Litigation re: Meyers Landfill Site: United States of America vs. El Dorado
County and City of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No.
S-01-1520 LKK GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Ca.
Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 54957.6(a)/Conference with Labor
Negotiators
Unrepresented Employee Position - General Manager
Agency Negotiators: Executive Committee, Board of Directors
t5. ACTION ! REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION
16. ADJOURNMENT (To the next regular meeting, June 16, 2005, 2:00 p.m.)
The South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month.
A complete agenda packet, including all backup information is available for review at the meeting and at the District
office during the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Fdday. Items on this agenda are numbered for
identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the order in which they appear on the agenda.
Designated times are for particular items only. Public Hearings will not be called to order prior to the time specified.
Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the agenda will be taken at the same time
the agenda items are heard; comments should be brief and directed to the specifics of the item being considered.
Comments on items not on the agenda can be heard during uComments from the Audience;" however, action cannot
be taken on items not on the agenda. Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all written matedal
presented at the meeting.
The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate
participation of the disabled in all of the District's public meetings. If particular accommodations for the disabled are
needed (i.e., disability-related aids, or other services), please contact the Clerk of the Board at 530.544.6474,
extension 6203, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
ITEMS
ao
Seasonal Help
(Mike Adams)
CONSENT CALENDAR
JUNE 2, 2005
REQUESTED ACTION
Approve Increase to Purchase Order
No. P16149 in an Amount Not to
Exceed $30,000
Seasonal Help
(Rick Hydrick / Chris Stanley)
Approve Purchase Order
No. P16162, to Pay for One
Seasonal Employee in the Under-
ground Repair Water Department,
in an Amount Not to Exceed $23,000
d
Sewer Enterprise 2005-06 Appropriations
Subject to Limitation
(Debbie Henderson)
B-Line Export Pipeline Replacement: Phase 3
(Jim Hoggatt)
Adopt Resolution No. 2800-05
Setting the Limitation on
Appropriations for Fiscal Year
2005-06, Superseding Resolution
No. 2789-04 in its Entirety
Approve Change Order to Cox &
Cox Construction in the Amount of
$66,125.27
Lease Agreement for Tahoe Paradise Building
(Rhonda McFarlane)
Approve the Lease Agreement with
El Dorado County Search and
Rescue for 1834 Santa Fe Road,
Building B, Tahoe Paradise, CA
Regular Board Meeting Minutes:
May 19, 2005
(Kathy Sharp)
Approve Minutes
South Tahoe Public Utility Distdct · 1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Phone 530.544.6474 · Facsimile 530.541.0614 · www.stpud.us
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
F. Ichard H. $olbHg
Direccor$
Tom Comt~
James R. Jones
Ma~ Lou Mo~bacher
Puane Wallace
Eric .$chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe e CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 ° Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Mike Adams, U/R Supervisor - Sewer
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Seasonal Help
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve increase to Purchase Order No. P16149 in
an amount not to exceed $30,000.
DISCUSSION: A seasonal employee started May 3, 2005, and another will be hired
after July 1,2005. The seasonal employees will work a total of 999 hours each or until
October 1,2005, whichever comes first.
The first seasonal employee is being used to perform the duties of a full time employee
(who has been reassigned to work on a special project locating any laterals that cross
creeks that might pose a potential risk to the collection system). The second seasonal
employee will be used to assist in easement clearing. District crews, along with
seasonal employees were able to clear approximately 65,000 feet of easements during
2004. With approximately 15-20 percent of the collection system in easements, clearing
easements is an important part of the overall maintenance of the collection system.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS: Not to exceed $30,000
ACCOUNT NO: 1001-4405
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $3,162 04/05, $38,000 05/06
ATTACHMENTS: None
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED A_C/~'I~N:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES'J~~_.~.~
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. Solbrlg
D/rec~or$
Tom Comt~
James I~ Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
[)uane Wallace
Eric Schafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive. SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.b
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Rick Hydrick, Manager of Field Operations
Chris Stanley, Acting U/R Supervisor Water Department
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Seasonal Help
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Purchase Order No. P16162, to pay for one
seasonal employee in the Underground Repair Water Department, in an amount not to
exceed $23,000.
DISCUSSION: During the summer, seasonal employees increase the productivity and
efficiency of the underground repair crews. In addition, the underground repair crews
are short-handed this summer, due to the loss of employees.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS: Not to exceed $23,000
ACCOUNT NO: 2001-4405
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: <$5,510> 04/05, $22,000 05/06
ATTACHMENTS: None
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ~,~TION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~y~
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Water
South Ta, hoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. ~olbrlg
Directors
Tom C, omts
James I~ Jones
Mary Lou Mo~bacher
Duane Wallac~
Enic ,~chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe e CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.c
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Debbie Henderson, Accounting Manager
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Sewer Enterprise 2005-06 Appropriations Subject to
Limitation.
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2800-05 setting the limitation
on appropriations for fiscal year 2005-06, superseding Resolution No. 2789-04 in its
entirety.
DISCUSSION: This is the District's annual resolution called for by Constitutional
Amendment XIIIB. The limitation on appropriations for fiscal year 2005-06 is
$47,350,131. The Sewer Enterprise fund budget for fiscal year 2005-06 appropriates
$23,658,624. As such, the District is $23,691,507 below the state mandated spending
limit.
SCHEDULE: Adopt resolution June 2, 2005
COSTS: N/A
ACCOUNT NO: N/A
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: N/A
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2800-05 and a calculation of the permitted
appropriation growth rate
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED A~,~'ION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES ~"~',
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~Jf'~'ll~ ~
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
RESOLUTION NO. 2800-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
ADOPTING THE SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND APPROPRIATIONS
SUBJECT TO LIMITATION AND PROCEEDS OF TAXES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2005-06
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have elected to approve
Constitutional Amendment XIIB, and the Legislature of the State of California has voted
to adopt Senate Bill No. 1352, which implements Constitutional Amendment XIIB,
setting the method of computing annual appropriations subject to limitation of local non-
residential construction and population; and
WHEREAS, the Directors selected the change in per capita personal income;
and
WHEREAS, such legislation sets the base year for this computation as Fiscal
Year 1978-79; and
WHEREAS, such legislation required documentation setting such appropriation
limitations shall be available to the public fifteen days prior to the adoption of this
resolution; and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2005, such documentation was made public:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the South
Tahoe Public Utility District does find and declare that the appropriations subject to
limitation for Fiscal Year 2005-06 are: $23,658,624; and that for Fiscal Year 2005-06,
the proceeds of taxes are defined in the enabling statues are: $5,266,001; and that the
increase in proceeds of taxes over the appropriations subject to limitations is: $-0.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a duly held regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District on the 2nd day of June, 2005, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Resolution No. 2800-05
June 2, 2005
Page 2
&TTEST:
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board
Eric W. Schafer, Board President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Permitted Growth Rate in Appropriations for 2005-06
Appropriation Limitation 2004-05
Increase In CA Per Capita Personal Income
$44,219,398
5.26 + 100.00=
100
1.0526
Increase In Population
E1 Dorado County
1.73 + 100.00=
100
1.0173
Change Ratio 1.0526 x 1.0173
X
1.0708
Appropriations Limitation for 2005-06
Actual Appropriations 2005-06
Limitation Exceeding Actual Appropriations 2005-06
$47,350,131
$23,658,624
$23,691~507
Historical Appropriations Limitations & Proceeds Of Taxes
--e-- Appropriation Limitation ---a-- Actual Appropriations
$50
$45
$40
$35
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$o ,.,.,~ ,.-~ ,.,.4 ,~,; ,~ ,-,4 ,~ ~,-~ =~4 ~
Fisml Year
2005-06 Actual Appropriations:
Cash Expenditures $19,195,624
Depreciation $~41463~000
Total Expenditures $23,658,624
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. 9olbrig
Tom Comt~
James I~ Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Duane Wallace
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.d
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Jim Hoggatt, Engineering Department Manager
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: B-Line Phase 3: Export Pipeline Replacement
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 7 to Cox & Cox
Construction in the amount of $66,125.27.
DISCUSSION: The itemized parts of Change Order No.'7 are as follows:
Part A, in the amount of $13,720.44, is for having to handle the k-rail twice due to
weather conditions. The day the k-rail was delivered the contractor where unable to set
traffic control and work on Highway 89 due to snow. The contractor had to off load the
k-rail in a staging area, and once the weather allowed the contractor had to move the k-
rail back to Highway 89. The Highway 89 portion of this project did not allow for
weather day delays.
Part B, in the amount of $7,529.28, is the delay cost because the contractor
could not work on May 28, 2004, due to rain. The Highway 89 portion of this project did
not allow for weather day delays.
Part C, in the amount of $35,759.31, is for additional drilling and blasting of rock.
The drilling and blasting for this project was done on time and material and this is the
last of the invoices.
Part D, in the amount of $9,116.24, is for the additional survey the contractor was
required to do. The contractor was required by contract to have a California licensed
surveyor do the lay out work from the District provided control points. There were
occasions when the District had to make modifications of the route and requested the
contractor provide the survey.
SCHEDULE: As soon as possible
COSTS: $66,125.27
ACCOUNT NO: 9098-8828/BLNIII
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: <$1,055,697>
ATTACHMENTS: Change Order No. 7, Budget Analysis
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES ,,~X///
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~_.Jz~_
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER
Project B-LINE REPLACEMENT - PHASE 3
Contractor COX & COX CONSTRUCTION, INC
Date June 2, 2005
7
PO # P14523
The Contract Shall Be Changed As Follows:
A) Cost for handling the K-rail the second time due to weather for a lump sum amount
of $13,720.44. See District letter dated May 2, 2005 for breakdown of all cost for
COR 3.
TOTAL FOR ITEM A IS $13,720.44
B) Cost for show up time for the General and Sub Contractor crews due to rain on May
28, 2004 for lump sum amount of $7,529.28. See District letter dated May 2, 2005
for breakdown of all cost for COR 16.
TOTAL FOR ITEM B IS $7,529.28
TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 7 IS A+B+C+D -- $66,125.27
Dollar Amounts Contract Time
Original Contract $4,996,642.00
Previous Change Orders $1,536,955.28
Current Contract $ 6,533,597.28
THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 66,125.27
New Contract Total $6,599,722.55
This Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for all time and all costs related to this
change. By acceptance of this Change Order the contractor agrees that the Change Order represents an
equitable adjustment to the contract price and time, and further agrees to waive all right to file a claim arising
out of or as a result of this change.
Authorized By STPUD Board President
Date:
Accepted By Contractor
Date:
Reviewed By
Date:
C) Increase amount for Contract Bid Item 11 Blasting by $35,759.31 as described in
Project Specification. Work was performed on time and material not to exceed
$35,759.31. See COR 35 for breakdown of cost.
TOTAL FOR ITEM C IS $35,759.31
D) Additional Surveying at project site for lump sum amount of $9,116.24. See District
letter dated May 2, 2005 for breakdown of cost for COR 36.
TOTAL FOR ITEM D IS $9,116.24
TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 7 IS A+B+C+D = $66,125.27
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. Solbrig
Dlrec'cor$
Tom Comte
James I~ Jones
Mary Lo. Mosbach~r
Duane Wallace
Eric Schafer
May 2, 2005
1275 MeadoW Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 ° www. stpud.us
Vernon R. Cox, .lr.
Cox & Cox Construction
P.O. Box 922588
6591 East Side Road
Redding, CA 96003
Re:
B Line Replacement Phase 3 Project
Response to the Request for Equitable Contract Adjustment
Dear Buddy:
This letter is in response to Cox & Cox's Request for Equitable Contract Adjustment
dated .lanuary 2005. The contents of this letter as well as any discussions pertaining to
the analysis will require action by the District's Board of Directors prior to any final
agreement on payments or settlements of contractual obligations associated with the B-
Line Phase 3 Project.
Introduction
The South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) received from Cox and Cox
Construction, ]:nc. (Contractor), a Request for Equitable Compensation on .lanuary :L2,
2005. After a brief preliminary review of the request, District staff asked for additional
information from Contractor on February 8, 2005. ]:n particular, the District requested a
copy of the original bid documents, as well as copies of contracts and correspondence
that Contractor had with all subcontractors and suppliers on the project. These
documents were obtained by Paul Sciuto and .lim Hoggatt at your office on February
25, 2005.
District staff has reviewed the request, as well as the original bid, initial construction
schedule, the requirements of the contract documents, approved change orders, project
correspondence, and the District's daily field reports.
As shown in the summary table below, the District's evaluation of the request is that
the amount of extra work not already covered by approved change orders is $276,250.
Vernon R. Cox, 3r.
Cox & Cox Construction
IVlay 2, 2005
Page 2
SUHMARY OF CLA~Zf4 ANALYSZS
Potholing $-0-
Snow Days $7,303
Utility Conflicts on Highway 89 $1:[7,710
Campground Road Delays $0
Creek Crossing Delay $0
Revised Grades 46+00 to 48+00 $0
Field Miters 71, 73 $0
Revised Grades 52+00 to 58+00 $0
Additional Equipment $0
Additional Excavation/Rock and Boulder $98,778
Excavation
Added Erosion Control $0
Added Concrete Slurry Costs on Hwy 89 $1,818
Extended Field Overhead $50,641
Home Office Overhead Costs $0
Subtotal $276,250
Markup (included in above costs) $0
Outside Claim Preparation Costs $0
Interest on Unpaid Costs (including markup)$0
TOTAL $276,250
The following pages address your Request for an Equitable Contract Adjustment in the
same order that they were presented by the Contractor. There were several cases
where the categories presented exhibited overlap that resulted in an amount of "double
counting." The District has attempted to identify each of these instances so that our
Response is as clear and direct as possible.
To evaluate the Contractor's request for additional funds the District first identified the
different components of the request and then directed each component to District staff
that had the most knowledge of how that particular component was approached by the
Contractor in the field, and what part the District played in the completion (or in some
cases, non-completion) of the component. The results of the District's evaluation of
each of the components that make up the Contractor's request for additional funds are
presented in the following attachments.
.D1) Delay No. 1 - Potholing
Potholing was conducted on May 4, 13, and 14 along Highway 89.
Vernon R, Cox,']r,
Cox & Cox Construction
IVlay 2, 2005
Page 3
Potholing to verify existing utilities is required per Specification Section 00200, Part 1,
1.02, B) 1). And Section 15052, Part 3, 3.01, A) 1) and 2). Potholing is also required
per Plans, Sheet T-l, G001 Note 4, and Sheets C-3 and C-4 Notes on Plan View.
The District can see no justification for granting an extra to the contract for required
potholing activities.
D2) Delay No. 2 - Days lost due to snow.
No work activities were conducted on Highway 89 which required lane closures due to
snow on May 10 and 11. Although the actual decision to not attempt to work on the
highway on May 11 was actually made by the Contractor (Chris Tanner at 6:50 a.m.),
the District agrees that in fact the Contractor's operation was delayed for these two
days.
See attached calculation for weather days' standby costs [Delay No. 2. Snow Days
(May 10 & 11) and Rain Day (Nay 28)].
D3) Delay No. 3 - Utility Conflict on Highway 89
A review of daily field reports reveals the following: Actual setting of K rail along
Highway 89, and the start of 24 hour traffic control, commenced on May 12. May 13
and 14 were spent conducting required potholing operations.
Based upon the above actual schedule, pipeline excavation activity did not commence
until IVlay 17, with a two-shiffc operation (excavation conducted at night).
Therefore the pipeline installation activity analysis along Highway 89 covers the period
May 17 through .lune 4; work days: May 17-21, 24-27 (note, May 28 is a rain day) and
.lune 1-4, for 13 workdays. 13-3.2=9.8 workdays which equals 78 hours. Recalculating
the worksheet, Credit from C0#3 Item C of $30,000.
Total: 147,710
-30,000
$117,710
In addition, a rain day delay on May 28 is agreed to by the District, and will be
compensated under the weather related item with the two snow days.
See attached calculation for utility conflict on Highway 89 [Delay No. 3. Delay Due to
Utility Conflict on Highway 89].
Vernon R. Cox, .~r.
Cox & Cox Construction
IVlay 2, 2005
Page 4
D4) Delay No. 4
The main contention on the campground road delay is that there were a number of
conditions that changed on the project from the time of bidding to the time of
construction. Each one is discussed below:
Only rocks over three feet could be blasted. The District never said that
rocks under three feet could not be blasted, only that the District would not
pay the time and material costs for the effort. Rocks up to three feet could
be excavated, but the Contractor chose to set up a crushing operation, which
required rocks to be broken up to under two feet. This means and methods
chosen was the Contractor's, and was actually different than what was
estimated in the bid process.
Articulated trucks had to be used because of the blasting restriction imposed
by the District, requiring the hauling of three-foot boulders. A review of the
Contractor's bid reveals that articulated trucks were planned to be used all
along - two for the excavation operation, and two for the backfill operation.
These trucks were required to traverse all of the off-road conditions on the
project, which was evident from the beginning.
The articulated trucks could not use the campground access road if drilling
and blasting was performed. What actually occurred was that the District
inspector would not authorize payment for drilling the pattern test holes, or
shot holes, more than once. :If the trucks ran over the drilled holes, and they
had to be drilled out again, that was regarded as a cost to the Contractor due
to his means and methods selection of the crushing operation.
The narrow right-of-way along the campground road was also listed as part
of the reason for the delay, precluding excavation work proceeding away
from the rock crusher. Again, nothing was different from bid time, and a
primary reason for making the prebid meeting mandatory was to ensure that
the Contractor would see first hand the site difficulties on this job, such as
the narrow right-of-way.
Given the two shift operation on the highway, which commenced on IVlay 17th, the
District cannot understand why drilling and blasting could not have been done
during the day along the campground access road while pipe installation, welding, x-
raying and coating operations were proceeding on the highway. The off-road
articulated trucks certainly would have been able to traverse the blasted road after
Vernon R. Cox, 3r.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 5
some minor amount of regrading, on the night shift for both excavation and backfill
operations on the highway.
No additional compensation is warranted.
DS) Delay No. 5 - Creek Crossing
No mention of work stoppage in dailies last week of _luly.
Review of daily field reports reveals no work stoppage on August 2 other than
equipment breakdown (322 Cat Exc, PC300), placing pipe, welding and coating
activities were continuing.
On August 3, the BMP's along the campground road had to be corrected prior to further
work proceeding. Cleanup in order to properly install rebar cage going on, as well as
cutting joint (MK-70 to MK-71) which was welded backwards. No evidence of work
stoppage.
On August 4, concrete placed, MK-70 to MK-71 rewelded, for work along lower
campground road.
On August 5, gave Contractor go ahead to install stream diversion for Grass Lake Creek
:L p.m. - process of diversion dam starts.
On August 6 - discussed secondary diversion dam.
On August 9 - resumed trenching at ! p.m.
It appears that this delay did not actually shut down necessary operations completely
for the entire 8 days. Given work items detailed on August 2, 3, and 4, and resuming
excavation at I p.m. on the 9th, it appears that 6 days is a more accurate delay amount.
Recalculating the delay table, and correcting for two equipment items, yields a figure of
$18,636. See attached table.
Given the fact that the District has paid $30,000 under Change Order NO. 3, :Item F for
extra work items for the creek restoration work, and the extra items such as secondary
sand bag dam, backup pump, laborer to check on pump, and double pipe system do
not appear to be anywhere near $30,000, no additional payment seems warranted.
See attached calculation table, "Delay No. 5. Delay at Creek Crossing".
Vernon R. Cox, Jr.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 7
Given the fact that the District has paid under Change Order No. 3, ]~tem E, $20,000 for
adjusting grades around the tear-out-and-replace section, no additional compensation is
warranted.
Additional Equipment
This item is predicatedon several key ideas. First of all, the amount of excavated
material that was handled was 4000 CY more than planned. As explained and
calculated in detail under the over excavation item, the amount of material actually
excavated on the project should have been expected and planned for. Secondly, the
statement is made that the District prevented Contractor from moving the crushing
operation from the campground to Luther Pass Pump Station (LPP$). This is not
correct. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) inspector and staff did in fact
raise objections based upon noise concerns for the neighborhood, but District staff
made it clear that we intended on allowing this operation to be conducted by the
Contractor. District field staff repeatedly asked when this move was to be done
because noise measurements were going to be recorded for information to be provided
TRPA. The contractor chose not to relocate the crusher for his own reasons. The
staging area shown on the drawings at LPP$ was utilized by the Contractor as he saw
fit.
A review of the bid documents reveals the following:
Even at the grossly underestimated excavation and backfill quantities (vertical trench
walls, no shoring), the truck fleet required was 2 articulated trucks on site, and two end
dump/haul trucks off site for the excavation operation, and the same for the backfill
operation. That is 8 trucks total, even at the volumes that were almost half of what
should have been expected. Our records, and the claim, seem to indicate a total of
about 8 trucks working the project. We do not see the justification for the District
paying for extra trucks due to rocks or boulders.
The three extra pieces of equipment listed (two excavators and a loader) are said to be
loading rock at bottom, but are shown as being on site from May 13, before any
excavation activities had occurred on the project. Only the Komatsu PC200 excavator
matches the correct time period for having to load rock at the LPPS, and, as stated
above, moving the crusher to LPP$ was allowed by the District.
In addition, the bid documents indicated three different excavators to be employed on
the project, even without a crushing operation on site, but simply loading out/hauling
off and importing all material. Four excavators were on site for only about 3.5 weeks
Vernon R. Cox, .]r.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 8
total on the project (8/31-9/25). Otherwise, only three excavators were on site at any
one time.
No additional compensation appears warranted for extra equipment.
Added Excavation Time for Quantity:
Attached is a detailed analysis by our design engineer on the request for additional
hours (and resulting costs) based upon an increase in the excavation quantities. The
conclusion is that compensation for additional excavation quantity is not warranted.
In addition to the actual calculations of excavation quantities, the contractor has
identified two particular areas where extra work was required. The first area was Sta.
21+00 to 25+50, where an error in the ground profile shown on the Plans was
discovered. This error would have led to a significant increase in the depth, of
excavation if the pipe had been installed at the elevation shown. The required depth-
of-installation for the pipe was reduced in order to save much of this extra excavation.
The costs to reweld joints on the steel pipe in order to raise the elevation of the line in
this 450-foot area were estimated to be $25,000, and were paid under Change Order
No. 3, Item D. The type of costs expected to be paid by this change order were
welding, x-raying and coating of the reconfigured joints in the pipeline, as well as some
additional surveying for the changed elevations.
A second area of extra work was the relocation of the line between Stations 11+00 to
18+00. Again, the pipeline depth was adjusted in order to accommodate the changed
ground profile along the route. Under Change Order No. 3.H. ($40,000), and Change
Order No. 4 ($35,460.84), the District has already paid for the pipe alteration work, per
COR#4 from Northwest Pipe for $75,460.84. Surveying work is covered under
COR#36. Thus, the above change orders and change order requests have already paid
for most of the work of the subcontractors for this item.
Added Rock Handling Time
Contractor has "guessed" that they spent two hours per day for their excavation
operation to handle three-foot diameter rock, versus 15 minutes for what they should
have anticipated. Nowhere in their bid documents, or field reports, can either of these
numbers be supported.
The soils report indicated rock, cobbles or boulders basically everywhere, and the
pattern drilling quantity was the entire length of the project, minus the tear out and
replace section.
Vernon R. Cox, Jr.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 9
The-Contractor did have a time and material estimate, as part of the bid, of $350,000,
in bid item No. 11.
Upon completion of the project, this item had been increased, per charge orders, to:
Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 3A
Change Order No. 5A
Change Order No. 6A
Total Increase:
Actual Blasting Total:
$450,000
$ 55,000
$ 86,306.07
$ 45,520.81
$636,826.88
$986,826.88
$986,826.88 / $350,000 = 2.82
Assuming the 15 minutes per 10-hour shit~ is the correct number, then we believe a
supportable number would be 15 x 2.82 = 42.3 minutes as time to deal with rocks
versus 15 minutes estimated. Rounding off, say 1/2 hour extra per shift. This is also
supported by the fact that Contractor received a 10% markup on all time and material
costs paid by the District for the blasting subcontractor. This resulted in a payment of
$89,711.53 to Contractor for this work, certainly more than enough to cover
administration, and supervision of the subcontractor's work.
For the 95 shifts, we then have 47.5 hours of extra work to deal with three-foot
diameter rocks.
In redoing the calculation, the District has paid $270,000 to cover overtime costs, and
so the operator time for the extra 47.5 hours to deal with the three-foot diameter rocks
should be paid at straight time.
In addition, the PC400 excavator was brought to the site on 5/10, before any
excavation work was done. To say that the District should pay the differential between
that and the PC300 excavator (the size excavator in the bid) due to handling of 3-foot
diameter rock does not seem warranted. It appears to the District that the severe
underestimation of the excavation quantity required is the reason for increasing the size
of the excavator.
The recalculation therefore totals $98,778. See attached Table, "Added Boulder
Removal Costs".
Vernon R. Cox, Jr.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 10
Erosion Control
Erosion Control measures would have had to have been installed at the commencement
of the project, and would have had to remain in place for the duration of the project
until revegetation work was nearly complete. Since the original schedule submitted for
the project showed the revegetation work not being completed until the first week of
October, the claim that the Contractor had to maintain the erosion control work for a
substantially longer period of time than planned does not appear to be supportable.
The District acknowledged that additional erosion control work was required by the
agencies, particularly along Highway 50. Thus, Change Order No. 3 !tern ! was written
and paid,, in the amount of $30,000. This actually exceeds the amount requested under
this item.
No additional compensation is warranted.
Slurry Costs
Bid quantity is based upon a vertical trench wall, i.e., 30 inches deep by 5 feet wide.
Without shoring, which was not done, this is absolutely not attainable, even as
described by Contractor in their excavation-overrun section of this claim.
There were no blasting restrictions in the highway not spelled out in the Plans and
Specs - in fact, blast relief holes were indicated on the Plans to reduce the disturbance
of the highway, which the Contractor and his subcontractor chose to not follow.
Although the District believes that not utilizing the blast relief holes exposed the
contractor to cover any overrun on the slurry quantity, the District checked the slurry
quantity based upon the required trench side slopes of 1.5 to 1. Comparing this
quantity to the actual quantity utilized yields an overrun of 15 cubic yards. At the
actual price of $96/CY, this results in an additional cost of $1,454. With the 25%
markup allowed the general contractor; the District will agree to pay an additional
$1,818.
Extended Field Overhead
The cost table was recalculated, based upon the previous analysis as follows:
Utility Conflicts on Highway 89: 9.8 days
Creek Crossing Delay: 6. days
Added Motel costs were based upon an additional 3 days for weather delays in addition
to the above.
Vernon R. Cox,
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page
Cost total was recalculated to $50,64::[.
Extended Home Office Overhead
The contract period per the Specifications was defined as the Notice to Proceed, to 10-
::[5-04. The Contractor's original schedule dated 1-28-04, utilized virtually the entire
contract period - until October 4, to complete the project'.
No extended home office overhead costs are due the Contractor during the specified
and planned contract period.
Outside Claim Preparation Cost~
Common practice in the industry is, unless there is a clear, prevailing party, in a
dispute, that neither side obtains payment for their legal or expert consultants costs.
Recovery of such costs are governed by the contract documents and California law.
No additional compensation is justified in this case.
Interest on Unpaid Costs
There are no provisions in the contract documents for payment of interest, therefore no
interest on unpaid extra costs is included.
Outstanding Change Order Requests:
The following Change Order Requests were listed in the Request for Equitable
Compensation:
COR No. 3: Snow Shutdown on May 10 and 11
COR No. :[6: Shutdown due to rain on May 28
COR No. 35: Additional Blasting Costs
]~n addition, COR No. 36, for additional surveying will be discussed here.
Vernon R. Cox, .lr.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 12
The following is a summary of the District's evaluation of the outstanding change order
requests:
Change Order Request
COR No. 3
COR No. 16
COR No. 35
COR No. 36
Totals
$13~720.44
$ 7~529.28
$ 35~759.31
$ 9~116.24
$ 66~125.27
Amount
COR No. 3 for $18,109.63
In the request for equitable compensation the District has agreed to pay for Cox and
Cox's equipment to be idle for the two-day weather shutdown. Under thiS COR, the
District agrees to pay for any show-up time costs, and the extra two days of costs for
subcontractor's and supplier of equipment.
In reviewing the daily reports for May 12th, K-rail was completed being set up by noon.
:In the p.m., blasting was conducted on the highway, as well as building the ramp with
import material off the highway at the pipeline location. Five hours - approximately
half the day, appears generous to cover the k-rail set up. The costs recalculated for
this is $13,720.44.
COR No. 16 for $71,077.66
Under the Request for Equitable Compensation, the District agreed to pay standby costs
for all of the equipment in recognition of the rain day on May 28th. The District will
agree to also reimburse the Contractor for show up time for subcontractors, and costs
for traffic control on the 28~ as well.
The majority of the costs claimed under this request are for traffic control for the entire
Memorial Day weekend, as well as June 1st and .lune 2nd. The Contractor had not
planned on working over that holiday weekend, so the costs for traffic control are not
an additional cost to the District.
In terms of corrective work to the BMP's on the project, that should have been
expected. The fact that this necessary corrective maintenance work to the BMP's was
concentrated around this rain day does not make it an extra cost to the District.
Vernon R. Cox, .Ir.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 13
]:n reviewing the daily work reports, some sloughing of material into the trench, and
some regrading effort was done by the crews after the weekend, and as a result of the
rain. This work was done while all other operations and activities continued on site -in
particular cutting, rewelding and recoating work required for some pipe relaying
activities. The regrading efforts do not appear to be unusually difficult, or time
consuming. For the contractor to think that no effort would be required to deal with
any weather-related impacts is not reasonable. -
]:n addition, the overall progress of the pipe laying operation, in terms of efficiency, is
addressed in the Request for Equitable Compensation, under Utility Conflicts on
Highway 89. The additional compensation to be paid under COR No. 16 is $7,529.28.
COR #35 for $35,759.31
Cox and Cox claims that approved time and material expenses were inadvertently left
off Pay Estimates No. 3 and No. 4 by the District. After a detailed review of the
attached inspectors notes, and pay estimates, we have concluded that these approved
costs have not been paid under any subsequent pay estimate. Thus, these costs are
due and payable to the Contractor.
COR #36 FOR $29,222.51
Cox and Cox claims that additional surveying was required, in about six different
categories of effort. They are addressed below, item-by-item.
Realigned sections:
Resurveying/restaking efforts were required for this portion of the project.
Pending an analysis of extra costs from Northwest Pipe, in light of the over $75,000
already paid for this change, these costs are tentatively approved:
$4,058.73
$1,552.68
$5~611.41
Remove and Replace Sections:
Requested in Request for Equitable Compensation:
Delay No. 6 $2,405.00
Delay No. 7 $2,425.00
Delay No. 8 $4,853.00
This change order request - Surveying $2,635.25
Vernon R. Cox, .lr.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 14
$2,765.20
$15,083.45
Paid under CO#3 Item E: $20,000
Thus, no additional compensation.
Final Closure:
Surveying 680.40
Paid under CO#3 Item L: $5,000
Thus, no additional compensation.
Control Point (CP) Survey:
The reason for this extra is unclear based upon the information presented. There were
lots of flagging, iron bars, and stakes in the ground in the area. Control point markings
were unique, and should not have been confused with all other points. If only 21 out of
28 control points listed on the plans (Sheet G-2) could be found, then it would seem as
though maybe 25% of the survey effort would be an extra, or $1,836.08. A letter
concerning COR #36 including additional information and responses will be forwarded
to your office and addressed separately.
Highway 89:
Due to the contract requirements for potholing to determine all of the actual elevations
for the existing utilities, the District fails to see why "Providing as-built survey data for
District use" should be an additional cost to the Owner.
Grass Lake Creek Bridge:
The revised calculations and offset layout for the additional footing depth is approved
as an extra, for $840.
Alignment and Grades:
The costs to resurvey and restake the pipeline between Stations 21+00 to 25+00 was
paid for as part of CO#3 Item D, for $25,000. Thus the $5,640.91 as requiring an
additional payment is denied.
The total approved extra costs for surveying is $8,287.49. Including a 10% markup,
results in extra compensation of $9,116.24.
Vernon R. Cox, Ir.
Cox & Cox Construction
May 2, 2005
Page 15
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me.
Sincerely,
Richard H. Solbrig
General Manager/Engineer
Enclosures
EXPORT PIPELINE - SEC B - PHASE III
Account: 9098-8828
BUDGET REMAINING ANALYSIS:
2004/05 All Years
Spent to date 4,343,522 8,030,758
Outstanding Purchase Orders-
Amec Earth & Environmental 3,528 3,528
Carollo Engineers 49,030 49,030
Codey, Jon 4,202 4,202
Cox & Cox Construction 816,559 816,559
Entrix Inc. 16,266 16,266
Groeniger & Co. 0 0
Hoes Engineering 3,581 3,581
HodelI-Natco 0 0
Johnson Perkins & Assoc 524 524
Kelley Erosion Control 14,560 14,560
Parsons 1,255 1,255
R Supply 163 163
Stantec Consulting Inc. 0 0
Swanson Hydrology 2,440 2,440
TRPA 66 66
Total Encumbered 912,175 912,175
Total Spent & Encumbered 5,255,697 8,942,932
Budget 4,200,000 7,887,236
Under (Over) (1,055,697) (1,055,696)
Note 1: The amount over budget reduces the Capital Outlay Reserve.
Updated: 5/9/05
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
F. icha~d H. Solbrlg
D/recUor$
Tom Comte
Jarrl~.~ R~ JoMes
Mary Lou Mosbachgr
Duane Wallace
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe ~ CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.e
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Rhonda McFarlane, Chief Financial Officer.
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Lease Agreement for Tahoe Paradise Building B
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize execution of Lease Agreement with El
Dorado County Search and Rescue (SAR) for 1834 Santa Fe Road, Building B, Tahoe
Paradise, CA.
DISCUSSION: The facility at 1834 Santa Fe Road, Building B, Tahoe Paradise, is
surplus and currently not in use. The El Dorado County SAR would like to use the
building for their headquarters. The Lease Agreement will allow the El Dorado County
SAR to use the facility for three years and will allow yearly extensions at the District's
discretion. El Dorado County SAR will maintain the building, pay all utility charges,
provide insurance, and be responsible for their own snow removal.
The Planning Committee met on April 21,2005, to discuss the proposal and
recommends entering into the Lease Agreement.
SCHEDULE: The Lease Agreement will begin July 1,2005.
COSTS: None
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: Lease Agreement
CATEGORY: Water
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (Lease), is made and entered into this __ day of June, 2005, by and
between the South Tahoe Public Utility District, a Califomia Public Agency formed in 1950 pursuant
to the Public Utility District Act (District), and E1 Dorado County, a political subdivision of the State
of California (County), with reference to the following facts and intentions:
A. County provides search and rescue services to the residents and visitors of E1 Dorado County,
California; and
B. County needs a facility to use for its search and rescue (SAR) headquarters and operations;
C. District has a surplus facility that it currently does not use, which is located at 1834 Santa Fe
Road, Building B (Premises); and
D. District is prepared to lease the Premises to County for its SAR headquarters and operations
under the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease and County agrees to such terms and
conditions.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Lease. District leases to County and County leases from District, for the Term, as defined
below, and upon all the terms, covenants and conditions stated in this Lease for the Premises as
described in section 3, below. District shall be deemed to have delivered possession of the Premises
to County on the commencement of the Term.
2. Term. The term of this Lease shall commence on July 1, 2005 (Commencement Date) and
end on June 30, 2008 (Termination Date), unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this
Lease (Term). The Term will be automatically extended for successive one year periods unless, at
least 180 days before the end of the Term, or any extended Term, the District provides County a
termination notice.
3. Premises. The Premises consists of the building commonly known as Building "B" and
located at 1834 Santa Fe Road, Tahoe Paradise, CA and the exterior area located approximately 30
feet south from the northern boundary and 30 feet west from the western end of said building, a map
of the Premises is attached as Exhibit A.
4. Utilities. County will be solely responsible and pay all utility charges to the Premises
including but not limited to water, sewer, power, gas, and refuse.
5. Insurance. County shall procure and maintain during the Term, at its own cost and expense,
the insurance specified in this section: County shall maintain automobile liability insurance with
373109vl 1
limits not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence, comprehensive general
liability insurance with limits of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and
statutory workers' compensation insurance. District shall be named as an additional insured on such
policies and shall be provided a certificate of insurance evidencing the above coverages. Each
certificate of insurance shall provide a minimum of thirty (30) days advance written notice to District
of any material change or cancellation of insurance required under this section. County will be
responsible for insuring County personal property stored at the Premises.
6. Snow Removal. County will be responsible for all snow removal from the Premises
including removal of any snow on the roof which District or County determines to be unsafe.
7. Premises Repairs. County shall be responsible for the cost and expense of keeping the
Premises in good repair and condition and shall maintain and repair the Premises, including but not
limited to interior and exterior walls, structure, painting, electrical, roofing, glass, plumbing, parking
areas and driveways.
8. Use. County shall use the Premises exclusively for SAR related operations, such as meetings,
training, storage of equipment, vehicles, and other needs in conformance with the SAR activities. All
vehicles and equipment stored or parked at the Premises must be in good working order, legally
registered to the County, and associated with the SAR operations. Vehicles belonging to County
employees and volunteers may be parked on the Premises while attending to SAR operations.
County shall conduct its activities on the Premises so as to not unreasonably disturb the quiet
enjoyment of nearby property owners and District's operations at Building A. County shall not make
alterations without the written consent of the District. County shall commit no waste or damage to
the building. No toxic or hazardous materials shall be stored at the Premises. No substance of a
dangerous flammable or explosive character shall be kept at the Premises.
9. Rent. As rent for the use of the Premises, County agrees to pay all costs and expenses for the
maintenance and repair of the Premises as provided in section 7, below, and to remm the Premises to
District in good repair and condition. County agrees that its use of the Premises will be at no cost to
District. Review of this Lease by District legal counsel and any reasonable District legal expenses
associated with this Lease will be reimbursed to District by County.
10. Termination. The parties may mutually agree to terminate this Lease at any time. In the
event of any dispute (includes any legal proceeding i.e. lawsuit, arbitration, action for declaratory
relief, etc.) concerning this Lease, the District may terminate this Lease immediately, and County
will have 30 days to vacate the Premises. District may terminate the Lease with County if County
breaches the terms of this Lease and fails to remedy the default within the 30 days after notice from
District including abandonment or vacation of the Premises for a period of thirty days or more.
County or District may terminate the Lease with sixty days notice if the Lease no longer is in the best
interest of either party. Upon 180 days notice, District may terminate the Lease at any time upon the
occurrence of if any of the following circumstances: 1) the property on which the Premises is
pending sale or 2) District deems the Premises is no longer surplus.
373109vl 2
11. Indemnification. County shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless District, its directors,
elected officials, officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, damages,
losses, liabilities and expenses, including attorneys' fees, paralegal and legal fees and costs, which
arise out of, relate to or result from this Lease or County's breach of its obligations under this Lease,
except to the extent any liability, claim, damage, loss, cost or expense that is caused by District's sole
active negligence or willful misconduct.
12. Entry by District. District reserves the right to enter the Premises at reasonable times to
inspect the Premises. County shall provide such access to District. District shall have the right to
maintain a passkey, and County shall not change the locks without providing District a key. District
also reserves the right to maintain or alter the Premises i.e. removal of the satellite pads. The County
shall cooperate with all reasonable requests of the District.
13. Sublease and Assienment. County shall not assign this Lease and shall not sublet the
Premises in whole or in part or permit the premises to be used or occupied by others without the
express written consent of District.
14. Surrender of Premises. Upon the termination of this Lease, County shall quit and surrender
the Premises in as good of condition as existed at the commencement of this Lease. County shall
remove all personal property, fixtures and other improvements to the Premises, if any, upon
termination of this Lease, unless District notifies County otherwise.
15. Destruction of Premises. If the Premises are destroyed substantially in anyway, either party
may terminate this Lease without liability for the remainder of the Term.
16. Acts of God. Neither party shall be deemed to be in violation of this Lease if it is prevented
from performing any of its obligations due to strikes, failure of public enemy, accidents, fires,
explosions, or acts of God, including without limitations, earthquakes, floods, winds or storms. In
such an event the intervening cause must not be through the fault of the party asserting such an
excuse, and the excused party is obligated to promptly perform in accordance with the terms of the
Lease after the intervening cause ceases.
17. Damage to Premises. County shall repair any damage to the Premises which occurs as a
result of the County's' use of the Premises or the County's other obligations pursuant to this Lease.
18. Compliance with Law. County shall comply and conduct its activities in accordance with
all local, state and federal laws. County shall obtain, at its sole cost and expense, any and all permits
and consents from any such governmental agencies having jurisdiction that are necessary for
performance of its rights and obligations pursuant to this Lease.
19. General Provisions.
19.1 Good Faith. Wherever in this Lease a party has the right to approve an
act of another party, the former shall exercise such discretion in good faith and according to
reasonable commercial standards. Similarly, where a party is required to satisfy a condition or
373109vl 3
complete an act in a certain fashion or within a specified time period, that party shall pursue such
objectives in good faith and make all reasonable efforts to accomplish the same; the other party
shall likewise in good faith cooperate and assist the other party in accomplishing this task to
cause the consummation of the agreement as intended by the parties and evidenced by this Lease.
19.2 Construction. The provisions of this Lease should be liberally construed
to effectuate its purposes. The language of this Lease shall be construed simply according to its
plain meaning and shall not be construed for or against either party, as each party has participated
in the drafting of this Lease and had the opportunity to have their counsel review it. Whenever
the context and construction so requires, all words used in the singular shall be deemed to be
used in the plural, all masculine shall include the feminine and neuter, and vice versa.
19.3 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Lease
shall be or become illegal, null, void or against public policy, or shall be held by any court of
competent jurisdiction to be illegal, null or void or against public policy, the remaining
provisions of this Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected, impaired or
invalidated thereby. The term, provision, covenant or condition that is so invalidated, voided or
held to be unenforceable shall be modified or changed by the parties to the extent possible to
carry out the intentions and directives stated in this Lease.
19.4 Signatures - Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. This Lease shall not be effective until the execution and delivery
between each of the parties of at least one set of counterparts. The parties authorize each other to
detach and combine original signature pages and consolidate them into a single identical original.
Any of such completely executed counterparts shall be sufficient proof of this Lease.
19.5 Assignment. A party shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
hypothecate, give, transfer, mortgage, sublet, license, or otherwise transfer or encumber all or any
part of its rights, duties, or other interests in this Lease or the proceeds thereof (collectively,
Assignment), without the other party's prior written consent, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any attempt to make an Assignment in violation of this
provision shall be a material default under this Lease and shall be null and void. Absent an
express signed written agreement between the parties to the contrary, no assignment of any of the
rights or obligations under this Lease shall result in a novation or in any other way release the
assignor from its obligations under this Lease.
19.6 Successors and Assigns. This Lease shall be binding on and shall inure
to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and
permitted assigns, except as restricted by this Lease.
19.7 Waiver. No waiver of any provision or consent to any action shall
constitute a waiver of any other provision or consent to any. other action, whether or not similar.
No waiver or consent shall constitute a continuing waiver or consent or commit a party to
provide a waiver in the future except to the extent specifically stated in writing. Any waiver
373109vl 4
given by a party shall be null and void if the party requesting such waiver has not provided a full
and complete disclosure of all material facts relevant to the waiver requested. No waiver shall be
binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver.
19.8 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the
validity and interpretation of this Lease without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws,
with venue for all purposes proper only in the County of El Dorado, State of California.
19.9 Notices. All notices, approvals, acceptances, demands and other
communications required or permitted under this Lease, to be effective shall be in writing and
shall be delivered in person or by U.S. mails (postage prepaid, certified, retum receipt requested)
or by Federal Express or other similar overnight delivery service to the party to whom the notice
is directed at the address of such party as follows:
To: District
Richard Solbrig, General Manager
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
With Copy To:
Gary M. Kvistad
Hatch and Parent
21 East Carrillo Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
To: County
Michael D. Sukau, Deputy Sheriff
E1 Dorado County Sheriff's Office
SAR Coordinator
1360 Johnson Blvd., Suite 200
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Any written communication given by mail shall be deemed delivered two (2)
business days after such mailing date and any written communication given by overnight delivery
service shall be deemed delivered one (1) business day after the dispatch date. Either party may
change its address by giving the other party written notice of its new address as prOvided above.
19.10 Attorneys' Fees. If any legal proceeding (lawsuit, arbitration, etc.),
including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this
Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover actual attorneys' fees and costs, which may
be determined by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.
The attorneys' fees award by the court shall be made as to fully reimburse for all attorneys' fees,
paralegal fees, costs and expenses actually incurred in good faith, regardless of the size of the
judgment, it being the intention of the parties to fully compensate for all attorneys' fees, paralegal
fees, costs and expenses paid or incurred in good faith.
19.11 Authorizations. All individuals executing this and other documents on
behalf of the respective parties certify and warrant that they have the capacity and have been duly
373109vl 5
authorized to so execute the documents on behalf of the entity so indicated. Each signatory shall
also indemnify the other parties to this Lease, and hold them harmless, from any and all damages,
costs, attorneys' fees, and other expenses, if the signatory is not so authorized.
19.12 Entire Agreement and Amendment. This Lease contains the entire
understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to the matters considered, and there have
been no promises, representations, agreements, warranties or undertakings by any of the parties,
either oral or written, of any character or nature binding except as stated in this Lease. This
Lease may be altered, amended or modified only by an instrument in writing, executed by the
parties to this Lease and by no other means. Each party waives their right to claim, contest or
assert that this Lease was modified, canceled, superseded or changed by any oral agreement,
course of conduct, waiver or estoppel.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease as of the date first stated
above.
District County
South Tahoe Public Utility District
County of E1 Dorado
By:
Eric Schafer, President
of the Board of Directors
By:
Charlie Paine, Chairman
of the Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
By:
Kathy Sharp,
Clerk of the Board
By:
Cindy Keck, County Clerk and
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
ex officio
SB 373109 v1:007627.0001
-6-
Consent Item 4. f
TAHOE PUBLIC UTILI DISTRICT
"Basic Services for a Complex World"
Richard Solblri~, General Manager
Eric W. Schafer, President
, Paul Sciuto, Assistant Manager
BOARD MEMBERS Duane Wallace, Vice President
James R. Jones, Director Mary Lou Mosbacher, Director
II I I II I I I I
Tom Comte, Director
I I I I I I I
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MAY 19, 2005
MINUTES
The Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District met in a regular session, May 19,
2005, 2:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 1900 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe,
California.
BOARD OF DIRECTOR~:
President Schafer; Directors Jones, Wallace, Comte,
Mosbacher.
ROLL CALL
STAFF:
Solbrig, Sharp, McFarlane, Sciuto, Cocking, Bergsohn,
Henderson, Attorney Kvistad.
GUESTS:
Dave Galicia, G.B. Inc.
Dave Galicia relayed the difficulties associated with
getting parts for odd-sized waterlines that are used in
some commercial and multi-family dwellings. He sug-
gested the Board impose a requirement to standardize
waterline sizes.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
The Board directed staff to work with Mr. Galicia, and
any other interested parties, to evaluate and report
back on this issue.
REGULAR'BOARD MEETING MINUTES ' MAY 19, 2005 ,PAGE - 2
Moved Comte / Second Mosbacher / Passed Unanimously CONSENT CALENDAR
to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted:
Geo-Referencing Survey Services - Phase I1:
Approved increasing the total for Purchase Order
No. P13895 in the amount of $85,440;
November 8, 2005 Consolidated Districts Election -
Adopted Resolution No. 2797-05 for El Dorado
County, Declaring an Election be Held in its
Jurisdiction, Consolidation with other Districts,
Requesting Election Services;
Sewer Enterprise Fund Budget: Fiscal Year
2005/06- Adopted Resolution No. 2798-05
adopting the budget for the Sewer Enterprise Fund;
Water Enterprise Fund Budget: Fiscal Year
2005/06- Adopted Resolution No. 2799-05
adopting the budget for the Water Enterprise Fund;
Rate Amendment Ordinance - Enacted Ordinance
No. 491-05 amending Ordinance No. 464, Adminis-
trative Code Sections 2.1.49, and 3.1.50 Water Rate
Schedules, and Section 4.5.12 Sewer Rate Schedule,
and Superseding Ordinance No. 483-02 in its Entirety;
f. Approved Regular Board Meeting Minutes:
Apdl 21, 2005;
g. Approved Public Meeting Minutes:
Apdl 28, 2005;
h. Approved Regular Board Meeting Minutes:
May 5, 2005.
ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION
Moved Comte / Second Wallace / Passed Unanimously
to approve payment in the amount of $930,210.04.
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Finance Commi .tte..e..: The committee met May 19. Topics
of discussion included: the District's reserve policy,
vadous types of grants, the third quarter financial report,
MTBE funds, and the audit of the self-insured medical
plan (where the 3n~ party claims administrator was found
to be doing a good job).
BOARD MEMBER STANDING
COMMITTEE REPORTS
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - MAY 19, 2005 PAGE - 3
Water and Wastewater Operations Committee: The
committee met May 16. Minutes of the meeting are
available upon request.
Planning Committee: The committee will meet next week
to discuss the request received from TRPA to install an
air quality monitoring station at the Glenwood Well site.
Lukins Water System Ad Hoc Committee: Staff met with
the ad hoc committee and determined the District should
request a copy of the evaluation that was prepared on
the Lukins Water Company. Attorney Kvistad requested
a copy of the evaluation from Dennis Crabb, and when it
is received, staff and the ad hoc committee will review it.
Director Jones reported on two items:
1) He, along with Dennis Cocking, attended the ACWA
Conference in San Jose. They attended different
sessions/meetings in order to cover as many topics as
possible. His sessions had to do with water quality, and
the main thrust was the California Blueprint reports he
helped prepare. Jones distributed the reports, which will
be given to the Governor to show decision makers that
action is needed now on water projects.
2) The Energy Bill passed through the House with the
MTBE safe harbor provisions still in it. It will go to the
Senate later this summer.
Director Wallace reported on problems with Pathway 2007.
General ManaRer: Richard Solbrig reported on five items:
1) He distributed copies of the Strategic Goals that will
be discussed at the June 2 Board Workshop.
2) SBC has not responded to staff's attempt to collect
for damages to our sewer forcemain on Al Tahoe. If
necessary, the District will pursue recovering costs for
repair of the line in small claims court.
3) The Planning Committee will meet with staff and
representatives of TRPA to discuss TRPA's request
to install an air quality monitoring station at the Glen-
wood Well site.
4) Director Mosbacher saw an article in the Tahoe
Daily Tdbune about electric vehicle charging stations
offered by utility districts on the North Shore. She was
concerned this could set a precedent and our District
would be required to offer this free service. Solbrig
stated the districts that were involved are also in charge
of recreation and parks, and obtained grants for the vehicle
charging stations. He was not concerned that our District
could ever be required to provide free electricity or vehicle
charging stations.
BOARD MEMBER STANDING
COMMITTEE REPORTS
BOARD MEMBER AD HOC
COMMITTEE REPORTS
BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - MAY 19, 2005 PAGE - 4
5) Director Mosbacher heard a news story about pension
plan problems some companies were having and wanted
to be sure the District's plan was stable. Solbrig assured
her that it is stable and District employees are aware that
it is stable.
GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS
(continued)
District Information Officer: Dennis Cocking reported
on several legislative issues. He also distributed a
legislative summary to Board members.
STAFF REPORT
3:10 - 3:20 P.M.
MEETING BREAK
3:20 P.M.
ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION
5:05 P.M.
RECONVENED TO REGULAR
SESSION
ACTION I REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION
No reportable Board action.
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b)/Conference with
Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation
(Two Cases)
No reportable Board action.
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with
Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation:
STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land
in Alpine County, California; et al.,
United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento
Division, Case No. CIV S-02-0238
MCE JFM
No reportable Board action.
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(c)lConference with
Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation:
Pioneer Trail Waterline Replacement
Near Filter Plant
No reportable Board action.
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with
Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
re: Meyers Landfill Site: United
States of Amedca vs. El Dorado
County and City of South Lake
Tahoe and Third Party Defendants,
Civil Action No. S-01-1520 LKK
GGH, United States District Court
for the Eastern Distdct of Ca.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES - MAY 19, 2005
No reportable Board action.
5:05 P.M.
PAGE- 5
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.6(a)/Confemnce with
Labor Negotiators:
Unrepresented Employee Position-
General Manager
Agency Negotiators: Executive
Committee, Board of Directors
ADJOURNMENT
Edc W. Schafer, Board President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Al-rEST:
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board
South Tahoe Public Utility District
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Kieha~d 14. $olbrlg
D~Tec~of'$
Tom COnlt,~
James I~ Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Ouane Wallace
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe e CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Lisa Coyner, Customer Service Manager
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Sewer Lateral Position Paper
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Review Position Paper and direct staff regarding
potential changes to ordinance.
DISCUSSION: On December 22, 2004, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants presented to the
Board an overview of the District's current sewer lateral ownership policy. The Board
asked staff to review the ownership policy and provide options to the Board at a later
date. Staff has completed a position paper and recommends that the District maintain
its current ownership policy with the customer owning the sewer lateral from the house
to the District's main. Additionally, staff recommends that sewer laterals be air tested
for new construction (currently only for remodels where there is an increase in sewer
units).
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: Position Paper
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED A/~N:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES _~x~'/'v~-'-
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~I~ ~¥ ~.~
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
Sewer Lateral Position Paper
BACKGROUND: A Community Forum was held on December 22, 2004 for a public
discussion on the South Tahoe Public Utility District's (District) Administrative Code
and policy regarding sewer lateral ownership. Approximately thirty (30) people attended
the forum, which included Board members and District staff. Matt Setty of Kennedy-
Jenks Consultants provided a presentation ritled Sewer Lateral Policy and Ownership.
The presentation provided an overview of the sewer lateral ownership policy of other
public utilities. Approximately 70% of those utilities polled indicated that their
customers were responsible for the entire length of the sewer lateral, or from the building
to the sewer main. The other 30% stated that customers were only responsible from the
building to the property line and that portion of the lateral from the property line to the
main was the responsibility of the utility.
The opinion voiced by the majority of the contractors in attendance at the Community
Forum was that the District should take ownership from the property line cleanout to the
main, or that portion which is in the public right-of-way. This was largely due to the
costs and permitting associated with excavating in the public right-of-way. However, one
member of the public expressed concern over the likelihood of sewer rates increasing
should the District transfer the responsibility from the property owner to the District.
She felt that the Community Forum advertisement should have included language
indicating that future large rate increases would be a possible result of the District change
in lateral ownership and that had the advertisement included that language, there would
have been a larger turnout of those in opposition to the District's taking over ownership
of a portion of the sewer lateral.
OPTIONS:
District assumes ownership of the sewer lateral from the property line to the main.
PROS:
> Work completed by experienced District staff or contractors
CONS:
> Additional staff required to take on calls for lateral blockages
> Additional tools and trucks for the added staffing
> Additional funds needed to pay for claims for lateral blockages
> Cost associated with replacement or repair of sewer lateral, at a cost of
approximately $5,000 each
District assumes partial responsibility of the sewer lateral from the property line
to the main. District responsible for replacement of faulty laterals in the street;
property owner responsible for the maintenance of the entire length of the lateral.
PROS:
> Work completed by experienced District staff or contractors
> Would resolve complaint from public regarding special license requirements
for working in street
CONS:
> Additional tools and trucks for the added staffing
> Cost associated with replacement or repair of sewer lateral, at a cost of
approximately $5,000 each
> Definition of"maintenance" would need to be determined to encompass all
possible maintenance scenarios
Customer maintains ownership of sewer lateral from house to District's main
PROS:
> Most customers are aware of this policy, as it has been in place for twenty
years
> No additional cost to the District or to majority of customers in the form of a
rate increase
> This policy is keeping up with standard industry practices
SOLUTIONS AVAIl,ABLE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER
The old way to correct a faulty sewer lateral was to dig up the street and repair or replace
the lateral. Now trenchless technologies are making correcting pipe problems easier and
less disruptive to the landscaping and lawns that are often important features to a home
and expensive to replace. Liners and pipebursting procedures, designed specifically for
sewer laterals, offer economical trenchless alternatives to pipe rehabilitation in many
situations.
In discussions with Phil Brand of the City of South Lake Tahoe's Housing Rehabilitation
program (HUD funded), they are agreeable to including sewer lateral repair or
replacements in their rehabilitation program. They will be changing their program to
include this as an eligible expense as it is included in the federal and state guidelines.
The rehabilitation funding, however, is only available to those lower income families
who qualify, for the program.
Driver-Alliant Insurance Services (an insurance carder for the District) is in the process
of developing a sewer and water line protection program. According to Driver-Alliant,
"this program would afford your customers protection from unexpected repairs that may
become necessary to repair the lateral water or sewer lines that connect their home to
your main. District staff has completed a questionnaire so that Driver-Alliant can
evaluate the feasibility of offering such a program to its customers.
POSITION OF DISTRICT STAFF
Based upon information provided by Kennedy-Jenks as well as the District's own staff
(inspectors and sewer crew), staff feels that the District should maintain current
Administrative Code requirements with the customer maintaining complete ownership of
the sewer lateral from the house to the District's main. Because the majority of the lateral
failures are due to improper use (dumping excessive grease, etc.) or maintenance by the
customer (regular root removal), the responsibility for the sewer lateral should be the
responsibility of the user. Currently the District does not require an air test for new
construction. Staff feels that sewer laterals should also be tested for all new construction
to ensure that the sewer lateral is airtight and not a furore source of I & I. District staff
also feels that the District should not extend its ownership and liability for maintenance
or repair/replacement beyond its current jurisdiction regardless of the District's position
towards providing some form of financial assistance for sewer lateral replacement.
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
F. Ichand H. Solbrig
D/rectors
Tom Comte,
Jam~s R. Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Duane Wallace
Eric Schafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.b
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Paul Sciuto / Assistant General Manager,
Richard Solbrig / General Manager
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: B-Line Phase 3: Export Pipeline Replacement -
Administrative Civil Liability
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve payment of Administrative Civil Liability from
Lahontan Region Water Quality Control Board (LRWQCB) in the amount of $70,000.
DISCUSSION: A leak occurred on the new portion of the B-Line on the evening of
Saturday, October 23, 2004. It is estimated that approximately 430,000 gallons may
have been discharged out of the line and ultimately to the Upper Truckee River. The
LRWQCB issued an Administrative Civil Liability (ACL) to the District pursuant to
Section 13350 of the California Water Code. Although LRWQCB did not find the District
negligent or culpable in this incident, 'due to the large discharge of treated effluent in the
Lake Tahoe Basin an ACL of $70,000 has been proposed.
SCHEDULE: As soon as possible
COSTS: $70,000
ACCOUNT NO: 9098-8828/BLNIII
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: <$1,055,697>
ATTACHMENTS: Complaint No. R6t 2005-0013 for ACL, Budget Analysis
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES ~"~-~,~ ~1~
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
85/26/2885 88:47 5385442271 CF~L,.I~.CB PAI3E 82/88
STATE OF C:'kLIFORNIA
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
.LAHONTAN REGION
In the matter of South Tahoe Public Utility District: )
Violation of Discharge Prohibitions Prescribed in the Water )
QualiD' Control Plma :~'or the L. ahontmi Region for the )
October 23,200,¢ discharge of treated domestic sewage )
effluent to the Upper Truckee River, South Lake Tahoe, )
E1 Dorado Coanty )
COMPLAINT NO. R6T
2005-0013 FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL
LIABILITY
ISSUED TO THE SOUTH TAHOE. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRiCT, YOU i~qE HEREBY
GIVEN NOTICE THAT:
You are charged with a violation ofprovis/o~s of law, or orders of the Regional Water
Quality Control Board, I_ahontrm Region, for which, the Region,sl Board ma}, impose civil
I/ability p~trsuant to Section 1>35~ ¢~ of the California Water Code.
A hearing on this matter will be l~eld before the Reg-ional Board within 90 days following
the se~,ice, of this Complaint 5fou or .','our representatives will have an opportunity-to
address ~d contest the allegations in this Complaint and the imposition of civil liability
by the Regional Board.
Pursuant to Section 13323 of the California Water Code, you may waive your right to a
hearing. If the heating is waived, the Regional Board will consider accepting the
proposed Administrative Civil kiabi]ity at/ts next regularly scheduled board meeting. If
the Re~onal Board accepts the proposed Administrative Civil Liability, no hearing will
Occur.
.'4.
If you choose not to waive your right to a hearing or the Regional Board decides to
modify 'this Complaint or the proposed Administrative Civil Liability, lhe Regional Board
will hold a heating. A_n agenda showdng the rime set for the hearing will be mailed to you
not less than ten days before the hearing date. At the hearing, the Regional Board will
consider whether to affirm, reject, or modkfy the proposed civil liability, and/or whether
to refer the matter to the Attorney General for recovery' of.judicial civil liability.
ALLEGATIONS
o
The Smith Tahoe Public 'Utility District ("Disthct") violated prohibitions contained in the
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahoman Region ("Basin P/an"). The Basin Plan was
adopted pursuant to Section 132a3 of the California Water Cod6. The Basin Plan
prescribes the following discharge prohibitions .for the Lake Tahoe Hydrologic Unit:
05/26/2805 08:4'7 5305442'271 (]R~CB PAGE 83/0@
The discha~xe of ri'eared or untreated domestic zewage, garbage or other
solid waxte$, or att}, other deleteriolt$ material to the $'ttrface water~ of the
Lake Tahoe Basbt is t~rohibited.
7.
The discharge, attributable to human activities, of solid or liquid waste
materials, including ~~oil, silt; clay, sand, and o&er organic and earthen
materials to the surface ~,'aters of the Z. ake Tahoe £asin is prohibited.
The District violated the above-referenced Prohibition No. 4 ','.'hen the new export
pipeline discl)arged approximately 430,000 gallons of treated effluent to the Upper
Truckee River, surface water tributmy to Lake Tahoe. A failed access man_hole gasket
caused the spill,
The D/strict violated the above-referenced Prohibition No. 7 wlhen erosion caused by the
above-referenced gasket failure discharged treated effluent that transported sediment to
the Upper Truckee JR. iver, a surface water tr/butarv to Lake. Tahoe.
The following information regarding the October 23, 2004 discharge was submitted by
the District in a spill report dated November 5, 2004..
Incident Chronolo~d
A C.n'a.qs Lake Road resident called the District at 11:05 PM on October 23, 2004 to report
an effluent discharge from the Luther Pass Pump Stat/on (Pump Station). District staff'
responded to the call and discovered a major leak in the new effluent export line at an
access manhole.
In response, District staff stopped all p'tm~ps feeding the export line by 11:20 PM.
Treatment Plant operators re-directed effluent export flows to the Emergency Retention
Basin at 11:35 PM. D/strict staffalso took action to direct as much backflow from. the
leaki.n5 export line as possible to the holding tanks at the Pump Station.
Cracks in the buried ten-inch drain-back line to the holding tanks caused a portion of the
draining flow to discharge to land. This leak continued to discharge treated effluent until
appro×irnately 9:00 .a3v~ the following mormng because it could not be stopped until the
entire export line had emptied.
Due to the high pressure associated with the effluent export line, tlhe le~& caused
significant soil erosion around the leaking manhole, displacing approximately 55 cubic.
yin'ds of material.
The spill discharged secondary treated, filtered, and chlorinated domestic effluent and
sedime~t to a nearby stream charmel that flowed dh'ectly to the Upper Truckee River.
Estimated Spill Volmne
According to the su~ml.ted sp~ 1 report, the export line holds approximately 600,000
gallons: Of the total line vohm~e, t'he District estimates 200,000 gallons was returned to
the onsite storage ta:4:s, baying 400,000 gallons spilled. Based on the drain t/me and the
85/26/20135 88:47 5385442271 CR~.,..Irk. CE; PAGE 134/88
recovered volume, the Disbfct estimates the leak discharge rate at 1,000 gallons per
minute. Although it is un_k.wtow~ how long the leak discharged before the resident
reported the spill, the Disrrict estimates the leak di. scharged for 30 minutes before District
staffwere able to turn off the pumps, adding an additional 30,000 galloas to tlxe spill
volume estimate for a total o£430,000 gallons.
Gaskets and Bolts
On a se.parate effluent replacement project (A-Line), the District had difficulty achieving
a sealed condition using an 80 Dm'ometer gasket and stainless steel bolts. According to
District staff, the gasket cormection required additional torque above the specification to
eliminate leaks during pressure testing. The higher torque caused the stainless steel bolts
to elongate, causing gasket failt~re.
Based o~¢ this experience, the District asked the Contractor to substit'ate a 60 Duxometer
gasket for the specified S0 Durometer gasket in sev-cn blind flange con.nections.
According to the District, experience on the A-Line effluent line replaceme~,t project
suggested the 60 Durometer gasket would require less bolt torque to ensure a sealed
condition than the 80 Durometer. The District decided the lower torque would put less
strain on the chosen stainless steel bolts, thus preventing any pote~)dal problems with the
bolt failure. Prior to gasket installation, the District contacted several gasket
manufacturers and confirmed the 60 Durometer gasket would be appropriate for the B-
Line application.
After the spill, the District chose to replace all installed 60 Durometer gaskets wit]~ 80
Dm'ometer gaskets and hardened steel bolts (as opposed to stainless steel) to provide
addjti, onal prevention against future spills. The District's Contractor had to w-rap the
bolts in petrolantm tape to prevent con-osio~a.
o
PROPOSED CIVIL LIABILITY
For the discharge of treated e£1'tuent and erosion products to the Upper 'truckee River on
October 23 and 24, 2004 the Re,anal Board may impose civil liability under the
following Section:
For disch~ges in viola.t/on of waste discharge requirements or discharge
prol~ibitions S ection 13350(e)(1) and Section 13350 (e)(2) of the California Water
Code provides that Sou& Tahoe Public Utility District may be liable in an amount
pursuant to the :follo~ving:
(i) £i~biliO., ~ot to exceed five thousa¢~d ($5, 000) dollars for each day in which
the violatio~ occurs.
OF
(,7) 7'he civil liabi/iO, o~ ~ per gallo~ basis may not exceed te~ do//ars ($10)for
each gallo~.z qf ~va3'tc dischm~ed.
In ~is mater, the maximum potential civil liability is $4.300,000.00 for the discharge of
430,000 gallons of treated effluent. ' ....
The Executive Officer of the Regional Board considered the following factors set out in
Section 13351 of the California Water Code in recommending the am.o'unt of the
adaninistrative civil liability:
a. The nature, circumsla~c¢& e:ctent, and ~ravity of the vioJation,s,.
The Upper Truckee River and Lake T~,oe are both listed on the FederaI Clean
Water Act Section 303(d) list as impaired due to excessive sediment and nuth,nts.
The spill discharged approximately 430,000 gallons of treated domestic
wastewater effluent and an estimated seven cubic yards of sediment to the UPPer
Truckee River, thc largest tributary to Lake Tahoe. Effluent smnples collected
from/he Luther Pass Pump Station driveway and 'samples collected from the fiver
at the point of spill entry, and approximately 50 feet downstream confirmed
elevated nut,Sent and sediment concentrations resulting from t'he spill. Nutrient
levels and turbidity reaumed to backD'ound levels approximately 24 hours after
the spill.
Based on 'the submitted effluent data, thc effluent port/on of the spill contained an
estimated 88.6 pounds of nitrogen and 11.3 poands ofphosphorus that was
discharged to the Upper Truckee Pdver. For comparison, the total nitrogen and
phosphorus loads fi.om thc Upper Truckee River on an average October day (24
hours) in 2004 were 12.1 pounds and 0.87 pounds, respect/vely, The spill also
discharged an estimated severn cubic yards of soil to the Upper Truckee River.
The discharge impacted ~oundwater resources as indicated by measm-ed elevated
chloride, turbiditT, nutrients, and bacteria in' ~'o nearby residential drJnldng water
wells the day of the spill. Ail elevated pollutant levels returned to pre-spill
conditions the day a£rer the spill.
Since the spill discharged sediment and nutrients to the Upper Truckee River and
thence to Lake Tahoe and had a short-term impact on groundwater resources in
the Lake Tahoe Hydrologic Unit, the discharge is considered a sehous violation.
~'f'Tzether the di~'chargc is suscefltible ro c&am~p or abatement;
' The high operating press~re of'the effluent Line (600 pounds per square inch)
caused an estimated discl-:arge rate of 1000 gallons per minute when the gasket
failed. Consequently, the 'bulk 'of the spill volume flowed thro%;h a culvert and a
ne~by residential pond, and discharged to the Upper Truckee River and was not
susceptible to clean up.
~35/~SI28~b 88: 4Z 53~54422Z1 CRb~Qr]B PAGE
Co
~he degree o.£toxicio., od'the discharge;
There were no analyses performed to determine the degree of toxicity of the
di. scharge. Chlorine analysis per£onned on fiver samples were below detection
limits.
Ability r,o pay,"
The South Tahoe Public Utility District Ixas not provided financial data to the
Regional Board to show inability to pay.
.The effect on the Discharger's ability to continue iix busin¢&t;
The South T'A~oe Public Utility District bas not provided information to the
Regional Board that would suggest payment of the maximum administrative civil
liability would affect its abiliLy to continue its bus/ness.
Any ¥otuntm),, clean up effortx undertaken by the violator;
The District did not un. dertake an), efforts to clean 'up the effluent discharge. The
District did take measures to remove sediment and other debris 'from the spill site
mad nem'by street to limit futile water quali .t'y impacts. The District pumped and
chlorinated affected residential drinking water wells to restore water quality to the
preexisting condition.
iVrior histo~T of violations;
The District l:as reported 14 sewage collection and conveyance system overflows
within the last two ).'ears. The District has consistently responde, d to all sewage
overt'lows promptly and has made a concerted effort to prioritize maintenance to
limit furore overflows.
The District pattie/pates in a. self-assessment and peer review progam
(AWW~WEF QualServe) to nleasm',~ its operations against other participating
water and wastewater utility districts. Using compil.ed benchmarking information
from the 186 participants, the District can as,ess its pe~ormanc¢ on a variety of
topics, including sewer overflow rates and collection system integrity. For both '
sewer overflow and collection system integrity, the Distr/ct ra~:ed in the top
quartile (best 25%) in both the 2003 and 2004 pro,am suD'es~.
Deg'ree
Tl~e export: line replacement project and the associated spill are the District's
responsibility. 7he District was solely responsible for ensuring the project was
constructed in accordance with all specifications and pccmit conditions.
10.
There is no evidence, however, to suggest the District was negligent or otllerwise
culpable for the October 23, 2004 discharge.
Economic savh,gx resulth~g fi~om the violation; and,
The Regional Board staff is una;vare of any economic savings resulting from the
violation.
h. Other matters as fi~tice may requh-e.
Regional Board staff have spent time responding to the incidents and preparing
the administrative civil liability. Estimated staff costs for spill response, spill.-
related correspondence, data analysis, and preparation of this cornplair/t are
$6,909.
The E×ecutive Officer of the Regional Board considered the above ~actors and proposes
that a&~inistrative civil liability be imposed by the Regional Board in the amount of
.$7020_0.0..00, pursuant to Section 13350 of the California Water Code.
WAIVER OF HEARING
You may waive die fight to a heating. If you choose to do so, please check and sign the
waiver and return it xvith a check for the amom~t of civil liability proposed in para,apb
I0 aboYe to the following address:
Calir'ornia Regional Water Quali'ti, Control Board
Lahontan Region
2501 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
In accordance with 40 CFR. Section 123.27(a). a.30-da¥ public comment period will be
required for a proposed seltlemant of admin/strative civil liability before the settlement
beco:mcs final.
Ordered by:
B.aROLD I. SINGER
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Dated:
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Lahontan Region
Alan C. Lloyd, Ph.D. Arnold Schwarzenegger
Agency Secretary 2501 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe, California 96150 Governor
(530) 542-5400 · Fax (530} 544-2271
http://www.waterboards.ca, gov/lahontan
WAIVER
OF RIGHT TO A
PUBLIC HEARING
Richard Solbrig, General Manager
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Complaint No. R6T-2005-0013
For
Administrative Civil Liability
$70,000
By signing below, I agree that the South Tahoe Public Utility District waives its right to a hearing
before the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region (Board) with
regard to the violations alleged in the above-referenced Complaint, dated May 27, 2005, and to
remit payment for the civil liability imposed. I understand that even though this waiver of a right
to a hearing has been signed, that the Regional Board will consider the settlement of the above-
referenced Complaint at a regularly scheduled Board meeting.
-At that meeting, the Board may only accept or reject the settlement. If the Board accepts the
settlement or rejects the Complaint, no further hearing will be required. If the Board rejects the
settlement, South Tahoe Public Utility District reserves its right to request a hearing to address
and contest the allegations in the Complaint and the imposition of civil liability by the Board, in
which case the tendered payment shall be retumed to South Tahoe Public Utility District. If the
Board holds a hearing, it will be noticed and all parties will have the opportunity to present
evidence to the Board.
Signature Title Date
Print your name
Send this signed form to:
Harold J. Singer, Executive Officer
California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Lahontan Region
2501 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
California Environmental Protection Agency
O Recycled Paper
EXPORT PIPELINE - SEC B - PHASE III
Account: 9098-8828
BUDGET REMAINING ANALYSIS:
2004/05 All Years
Spent to date 4,343,522 8,030,758
Outstanding Purchase Orders-
Amec Earth & Environmental 3,528 3,528
Carollo Engineers 49,030 49,030
Corley, Jon 4,202 4,202
Cox & Cox Construction 816,559 816,559
Entrix Inc. 16,266 16,266
Groeniger & Co. 0 0
Hoes Engineering 3,581 3,581
HodelI-Natco 0 0
Johnson Perkins & Assoc 524 524
Kelley Erosion Control 14,560 14,560
Parsons 1,255 1,255
R Supply 163 163
Stantec Consulting Inc. 0 0
Swanson Hydrology 2,440 2,440
TRPA 66 66
Total Encumbered
912,175 912,175
Total Spent & Encumbered
5,255,697 8,942,932
Budget 4,200,000 7,887,236
Under (Over) (1,055,697) (1,055,696)
Note 1: The amount over budget reduces the Capital Outlay Reserve.
Updated: 5/9/05
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. 5olbrlg
D/rec[or$
Tom Comt~
James R. Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Puane Wallace
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, SoUth Lake Tahoe ~ CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud,us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.c
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Rhonda McFarlane, Chief Financial Officer
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Reserve Policy
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2801-05 to update the District's
reserve policy, superseding Resolution No. 2785-04 in its entirety.
DISCUSSION: The District adopted its present Reserve Policy in April 2004. Two
months later the California State Auditor issued a report that provided recommendations
on reserves. Based on the state's recommendations the existing Reserve Policy has
been updated to:
· Add maximum target levels to all reserves
· Clearly identify events or conditions that prompt use of reserves
· Reference the relationship of capital reserves to the 10-Year Ten-Year
Forecast of capital spending.
The Finance Committee met to discuss the reserve policy and recommends
approval.
SCHEDULE: Approve today
COSTS: None
ACCOUNT NO: N/A
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: N/A
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Reserve Policy and Reserve Policy Information Sheet
CO.CU.RE.CE W,~..EQUES~E. A~}O":
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
c.,~ ~,.^.c,^~ o~,c~.: ~s.~.'
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer & Water
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
RESOLUTION NO. 2801-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
ADOPTING A NEW RESERVE POLICY SUPERSEDING
RESOLUTION NO. 2785-04 IN ITS ENTIRETY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility
District, County of El Dorado, State of California, as follows:
WHEREAS, the District maintains operating, capital, self-insurance, and rate
stabilization reserves; and
WHEREAS, establishing and maintaining adequate reserves is important to the
fiscal health of the District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors formally adopted a reserve policy in 2004;
and
WHEREAS, the California State Auditor reported in June 2004 on audits of eight
other California Independent Water Districts; and
WHEREAS, the District desires to incorporate suggestions made by the
California State Auditor in its reserve policy.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the South
Tahoe Public Utility District that: The attached Reserve Policy is hereby adopted and
becomes a part of this Resolution by reference herein. Further, Resolution 2785-04 is
hereby superseded in its entirety.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a duly held regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District on the 2nd day of June, 2005, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Eric W. Schafer, Board President
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Reserve Policy
PURPOSE
South Tahoe Public Utility District (the District) shall maintain reserve funds in the
Sewer and Water Enterprise Funds. This policy establishes the level of reserves
necessary for maintaining the District's credit worthiness and for adequately
providing for:
· Funding infrastructure replacement.
· Economic uncertainties and other financial hardships.
· Loss of significant revenue sources such as property tax receipts or
connection fees.
· Local disasters or catastrophic events.
· Future debt or capital obligations.
· Cash flow requirements.
· Unfunded mandates including costly regulatory requirements.
POLICY
Operating Reserves
The minimum amount of operating reserves will equal two months of operating
expenses. The maximum amount of operating reserves will equal three months
of operating expenses.
Capital Reserves
Capital reserves will be accumulated to fund infrastructure projects and will be an
integral part of the District's capital plan documented in its Ten-Year Forecast. A
key objective for accumulating capital reserves is to minimize external borrowing
and interest expense. The minimum amount of capital reserves will equal one
year's capital spending. The maximum amount of capital reserves will equal two
times the accumulated depreciation balance.
Self-Insurance Reserves
The minimum self-insurance reserve will equal $300,000. The maximum self-
insurance reserve will equal the current annual health insurance expense budget.
Rate Stabilization Fund
The Sewer Enterprise Fund will maintain a minimum rate stabilization fund equal
to one year's property tax receipts and a maximum rate stabilization fund equal to
one and one-half year's property tax receipts. Both the minimum and maximum
amounts will be net of related County of El Dorado's administration cost and
shifts to the City of South Lake Tahoe's redevelopment agency.
The Water Enterprise Fund will not maintain a rate stabilization fund while the
funds restricted from the MTBE settlements and judgments exceed $2 million. At
such time as the MTBE settlement funds fall below $2 million, the District will
establish a rate stabilization fund with a minimum amount equaling one year's
water consumption revenue and a maximum amount equaling one and one-half
year's water consumption revenue.
PROCEDURE FOR USING RESERVE FUNDS
Operatin.q and Self-Insurance Reserves
Operating and self-insurance reserves can be used at any time to meet cash flow
requirements of District operations. Authority to use the funds will be consistent
with the District's Purchasing Policy.
Capital Reserves
The Board of Directors will authorize use of capital reserves during the budget
process. Capital reserves are also available for unplanned (unbudgeted) capital
replacement. Authorization for the use of capital reserves for unplanned capital
replacement will be consistent with the District's Purchasing Policy.
Rate Stabilization Fund
The Chief Financial Officer is authorized to use rate stabilization funds to
supplement operating revenue when:
· Total revenue in either the Sewer Enterprise Fund or the Water Enterprise
Fund is projected to be five percent or more below the annual budgeted
revenue.
· Developing the budget to limit customer rate increases to no more than
two and one-half times the consumer price index for small west coast
cities.
PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING RESERVE LEVELS
The Chief Financial Officer shall perform a reserve analysis to be submitted to
the Board of Directors upon the occurrence of the following events:
· Board of Directors' deliberation of the annual budget;
· Board of Directors' deliberation of a service charge rate increase;
· Upon renewal of the self-insurance excess insurance coverage; or,
· When a major change in conditions threatens the reserve levels
established within this policy.
If the analysis indicates projected or actual reserve levels falling 10% below or
above the levels outlined in this policy, at least one of the following actions shall
be included with the analysis:
· An explanation of why the reserve levels are not at the targeted level, and/
or
· An identified course of action to bring reserve levels within the minimum
and maximum levels prescribed.
p:\FINANCE\Policies\Reserve Policy 2005.doc
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. ~olbrig
Directors
Tom Comte
Jarng~ 1~. Jonee
Ma~ Lou Mo~bach~r
Puane Wallace
Eric Schafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive. SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.d
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Rick Hydrick, Manager of Field Operations
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: College Well License Agreement
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION' Direct staff to exercise option to extend license
agreement an additional twenty-five years.
DISCUSSION: The College Well has been on emergency standby status since 1991. It
can be used in emergencies up to fifteen days a year, no more than five consecutive
days at a time. The last time it was used was to fight the Gondola fire. It is a reliable
resource, and may be used for irrigation in the future and for fire fighting at the College.
The license agreement entitles the College currently to 52,980 feet of water per
quarter, a value of $985.43. The well also includes three monitoring wells, which are
important for District groundwater research.
SCHEDULE: N/A
COSTS: $3,941.72 per year
ACCOUNT NO: N/A
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: N/A
ATTACHMENTS: College Well License Agreement
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED Ay,~ON:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES ,~'~, ~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES .~~/,~_ NO
CATEGORY: Water
APR ' 8 %98Z CO,UNITY COLLEGE WELL LICENSE ~'C:';,f>-, :';, ..... ,~ ,,'R,.
AGREEMENT
THIS LICENSE AGREE~NT is made by and between LAKE TAHOE -~
COMMUNITY COLLEGE, P.O. BOX 144~,SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
95705, referred to herein as COLLEGE, and SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT, P.O. BOX A U, SOUTH LAKE .TAHOE, CALIF0~IA
95705, referred to herein as DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, COLLEGE is the OWNER of certain real property
located in South Lake Tahoe, County of E1 Dorado, California,
commonly referred to as COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT is desirous of securing license permission
for drilling and constructing'a well, structures and appurtenances
therefor, water pipelines therefor, access for dilling and construct-
ing said well, structures, appurtenances and pipelines, a further
license permission for maintenance and operation of said well,
structures, appurtenances, pipelines and access therefor, all for
the pumping of water from said well through said pipelines for
domestic and fire protection purposes of DISTRICT, including
domestic and fire protection service for future COLLEGE facilities,
all on said COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY; and
WHEREAS, the issuance of a license permission by COLLEGE to
DISTRICT for said purposes referred to in the immediately preceeding
recital paragraph will be of benefit to COLLEGE; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT has heretofore drilled and constructed a
monitoring well, including structures and appurtenances necessary
therefor, on said COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY, pursuant to a prior
written agreement between COLLEGE and DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT is desirous of securing a license permission
by COLLEGE to DISTRICT for the continued maintenance and operation
of said monitoring well on said COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY for the
purposes of monitoring the underground water acquifier, sampling
quality of water in said acquifier determining the efficiency of
said new well and for ground water management; and
..-.3,
WHEREAS, the continued operation and maintenance of said
monitOring well by DISTRICT for said purposes referred to in the
immediately preceeding recital paragraph will be a benefit to
COLLEGE; and
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, as follows:'
1. COLLEGE hereby grants a license permission to DISTRICT
to drill and construct a well, structures and appurtenances necessary
therefor, water pipelines therefor, access for drilling and construc-
tion of said well, structures, appurtenances necessary therefor, and
pipelines, for the pumping of water from said well and through said
pipelines for domestic and fire protection purposes, including
domestic and fire protection service for future COLLEGE facilities
on said COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY in the location more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, and in accordance with (1) Plan and Elevation of Well
House, and (2) Location Map, which Plan and Location Map are marked
Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein be reference.
2. The drilling and construction of said well, structures,
appurtenances necessary therefor, pipelines and access for drilling
and construction of said well, structures, appurtenances necessary
therefor, and pipelines shall be accomplished in a workmanlike manner,
and DISTRICT shall repair or replace any property or improvements
or facilities of COLLEGE damaged or destroyed in the course of said
drilling and construction.
3. COLLEGE hereby grants a license permission to DISTRICT
to maintain and operate said well, structures, appurtenances, pipe-
lines and access therefor, for the pumping of water from said well
and through said pipelines for domestic and fire protection purposes,
including domestic and fire protection service for future COLLEGE
facilities on said COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY, in the location more
particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference, and in accordance with (1) Plan and Elevation
of Well House, and (2) Location Map, which Plan and Location Map are
marked Exhibit "B" attached and incorporated herein by reference.
-2-
4. The maintenance and operation of said well, structures,
appurtenances necessary therefor, pipelines and access for said
maintenance and operation of said well, structures, appurtenances
necessary therefor, and pipelines shall be accomplished in a work-
manlike manner, and DISTRICT shall repair or replace any property
or improvements or facilities of COLLEGE damaged or destroyed in
the course of said maintenance and operation.
5. COLLEGE hereby grants a license permission to DISTRICT for~
the continued maintenance and operation of a monitoring well now
constructed on said CO~UNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY and access therefor,
for the purposes of monitoring the underground water acquifier, sampl-
ing quality of water in said acquifier, determining the efficiency
of said new well and for ground watermanagement on said COMMUNITY
COLLEGE PROPERTY in the location more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
and in accordance with (1) Plan and (2) Location Map, which Plan
and Location Map are marked Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporat-
ed herein by reference. No building or appurtenances shall be
constructed around said monitoring well by DISTRICT. Any pipe
protruding above the surface of said monitoring well shall be
encased in a safe manner satisfactory to COLLEGE.
6. The new well may also be used by COLLEGE and DISTRICT
for training purposes. The new well site and monitoring well
site will not be open to the public, nor shall access thereto
be made available for any purpose except as expressly permitted
by this LICENSE AGREEMENT.
7. DISTRICT shall not construct any facility, well or
structure, on the new well site, except as expressly permitted
by this LICENSE AGREEMENT. Should the water pumped from said new
well contain excessive amounts of harmful chemicals such as
Manganese (MN), a filter may have to be installed next to the
building structure on said new well site. Any filter so required
shall be constructed and installed in a manner satisfactory to
COLLEGE, and at a location approved by COLLEGE.
-3-
~ ' 8. DISTRICT-shall comply with all rules and regulations of
any applicable regulatory agency in the drilling, construction, maintenance
and operations of said new well, structures, necessary appurtenances
therefor, pipelines and access therefor, and in the maintenance and
operation of said monitoring well and access therefor; and shall not
cause COLLEGE to violate any rules or regulations of said applicable
regulatory agencies.
9. The ownership, operation and maintenance of the new well,
structures, appurtenances necessary therefor, pipelines access and
the pumping of water therefrom on the COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY,
and the ownership, maintenance and operation of the monitoring well
together with any protruding encased pipe, and access therefor, on
said COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY shall be in DISTRICT. Nothing herein
shall be construed to grant DISTRICT any right, title or interest in
the COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY.
10. The term of this license permission to DISTRICT herein is
for a period of twenty-five (25) years. DISTRICT shall have the
option of extending said term for an additional twenty-five (25)
years. DISTRICT shall exercise said option by notifying COLLEGE in
writing one (1) year prior to the expiration of the initial term of
twenty-five (25) year option term. All of the terms and provisions
of this COMMUNITY COLLEGE WELL LICENSE AGREEMENT shall be applicable
to said twenty-five (25) year option term. If the District has further
need for the use of the COLLEGE WELL at the end of the option period,
DISTRICT and COLLEGE shall renegotiate the provisions for additional
term.
11. COLLEGE specifically reserves all rights to minerals on
the COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY which is subject of this LICENSE
AGREEMENT, and further reserves all other rights in the COMMU~ITY
COLLEGE PROPERTY not inconsistent with this LICENSE AGREEMENT.
DISTRICT pipeline use on COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY subject of this
LICENSE AGREEMENT shall be for the transmission of domestic and
fire protection water only.
12. DISTRICT shall furnish to COLLEGE as and for permission
granted in this LICENSE AGREEMENT the following water connections and
water service:
-4-
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
FIRE FLOW CONNECTION
One (1) eight inch (8") diameter
fire flow connection shall be provided
at no cost to COLLEGE. The location
of the connection shall be determined
by COLLEGE.
FIRE FLOW WATER SERVICE
The fire flow water provided through
the eight inch fire connection shall
be provided at not cost to COLLEGE.
METERED DOI.~STIC SERVICE CONNECTION
One (1) four-inch (4") diameter metered
domestic water service connection shall
be installed by DISTRICT at no cost to
COLLEGE. The location of the connection
shall be determined by COLLEGE.
5~TERED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
COLLEGE shall not pay for the four-
inch (4") meter minimum domestic
service rate charged other customers
and shall receive a quantity of water
each month of up to 17,660 cubic feet
at no charge. COLLEGE shall pay for
any additional water service over and
above the four-inch (4") meter minimum
domestic service rate charged other
customers of DISTRICT or over 17,660
cubic feet in any one month period,
whichever use rate is greater. The
charge for the excess comsumption by
COLLEGE shall be charged at the same
rate as charged other customers of
DISTRICT. COLLEGE shall cooperate
with DISTRICT in the management of
efficient water use and water conserva-
tion practices.
-5-
(e)
CONNECTION FOR FUTURE FI'RE HYDRANT
DISTRICT shall provide a connection
for a future fire hydrant. The
location of the connection shall be
on the twelve inch (12") diameter
water transmission line located
within the easement provided by
this AGREEMENT.
13. Until such time as the COLLEGE has need for water service
for the COLLEGE facilities, the DISTRICT will pay to COLLEGE, on or
before the fifteenth of JULY each year, a sum equal to the established
minimum annual water service rate for a four-inch (4") meter service
in the District's service area. Said payment shall commence upon
the date of execution of this AGREEMENT. DISTRICT shall reserve
capacity in the DISTRICT'S water supply system to serve COLLEGE with
the domestic water service and fire flow provided for by this
AGREEMENT.
14. DISTRICT shall indemnify and hold COLLEGE harmless from
and against all cost and losses and all claims, demands, suits, actions,
payments and judgments arising from personal injuries or property
damage or otherwise sought or recovered against the COLLEGE by reason
of any act or omission of the DISTRICT or its agents, servants or
employees in connection with the drilling, construction, maintenance
and operation of said new well, structures, necessary appurtenances,
pipelines and access therefor, and the continued maintenance and
operation of said monitoring well, and protruding encased pipe
therefor, and access therefor, including any and all expenses,
legal or otherwise, incurred by the COLLEGE or its representatives
in the defense of any claim or suit. The DISTRICT shall insure the
provisions of this indemnity paragraph to the~tent of at least
$500,000 per individual and $1,000,000 per occurrence, personal
-6-
injury and property damage liability insurance, which policy of
insurance shall include an additional insured endorsement providing
that said insurance is primary insurance for all risks that might be
incurred by COLLEGE in connection with DISTRICT use of CO~UNITY
COLLEGE PROPERTY under the provisions of this LICENSE AGREEMENT.
15. At the termination of this AGREEMENT, DISTRICT shall re-
move the pump motors and appurtenances of said new well, and monitor-
ing well structures for said wells and seal said wells in conformance
of state health and safety standards, which shall then remain
permanently sealed by COLLEGE. COLLEGE shall have to option to
assume responsibility and ownership of the pump motors and
appurtenances of said well upon termination of this AGREEMENT.
DATED: June 11, 1981
LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Chairman, Board of Trustees
COLLEGE
ATTES~: 7
-' -~R~_nt/President
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF EL DORADO
OFFICIAL SEAL
NOTARy PUBLIC . CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF FL DO~ADO
~:~"~;2,~ll;'"W;r~,~t~.-- p es January 14 1~o~
Pat. Mamath ., before me.
d~lD~ c°.mm~ioned an,; ...... , a Notarg Public, State off Californ~,
erta L. Has$~'~S%_persopgll.v a~ ed
-..,,-, oames W. I)uk~ ar . ~
-'--- -known to me to be the persons____ whose name~
~ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that__~ he~__.._ executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF i have hereunto set my hand andaffixed
my official seal in the $~t~ of California,
E1 Dorado - County of
r.~ oddment ~s oo above written. - the day and year in this certificate first
' -~' Y a general form which may be pro rf
Ta~n~d ~.o. way acts. or is intended t .... Pe or Use in
..= P~blisher dOes n~* -- .- ---~, as a substitute f ,~.~ . ~""~','~ ~ransactlons
validly o! ...... -.,,,a~e any warranty, either .... .~o.r..... a~v~ce vt an attorney
- =-x prowslon or the suitabilitv of th-o- ,.-"-"~"~"~ o~ ~mpl~ed as to the
SIHIHXH
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
COLLEGE WELL EASEMENTS
Easement No. 1 for the 150' x 120' Well Site
The south corner starting,point of the easement shall be
located on the Lake Tahoe Community College southeast
property line adjacent to the freeway reserve described
as follows:
Beginning at the S.E. corner of the west 1/2 of Lot 12,
Section 3, T.12N, R.18E., MDM proceed S89°25'26"W for 50.60
feet thence N41°39'29"E for 575.00 feet. Beginning at this
south corner, the easement shall be the area enclosed pro-
ceeding N41°39'29"E for 150.00 feet (southeast side of ease-
ment), then proceeding N48°20'31TM for 120.00 feet (north-
east side of easement), then proceeding S41°39'29TM for 150.00
feet (northwest side of easement), then proceeding S48°20'31''E
for 120.00 feet back to the south corner starting point.
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
COLLEGE WELL EASEMENTS
Easement No~ 2 for the Well Site Access Road
Beginning at the "south corner starting point" of Easement
No. 1 proceed N48°20'31"W for 73.00 feet to the centerline
of the northeast end of the access road easement. The
access road easement shall be a 25-foot wide strip between
the well site Easement No. 1 and the existing sewer force
main easement called Easement B and recorded in Book 1035,
page 742 and 743. The centerline of this strip shall begin
at a point 73.00 feet N.48°20'31"W of the "south corner
starting point"of Easement No. 1. The centerline of the 25-
foot wide easement shall proceed southwest from this starting
point S66°00' west for 113.00 feet, S58°00'W for 48.00 feet,
S48°00'W for 46.00 feet and S53°30'W for approximately 68.00
feet until the east side of the sewer force main easement is
intercepted.
2062
I !
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
COLLEGE WELL EASEMENTS
Easement No. 3 for the Monitoring Well Site
The monitoring well easement shall be a triangular area
with the south corner starting point located at the inter-
section of the Lake Tahoe Community College southeast
property line and the east side of the sewer force main ease-
ment. From this south corner proceed N0°31'43"W along the
east sewer force main easement for 120.00 feet, then N89°28'17"
east until interception of the Lake Tahoe Community College
southeast property line, then S41°39'29"W to the 'south cor-
ner starting point.
A.C. DRIVE
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
COLLEGE WELL EASEMENTS
Easement No. 4 for Sewer and Water Force Mains and Access Road
An easement 26 feet wide over that portion of lots 12 and 12, Section
3 Township 12 North, Range 13 East, M.D.M., the center line of which
is described as follows:
The southern-most point of the centerline of the easement is located
north 16° 42' 44' east 88.30 feet from a capped iron pipe marking the
southeast corner of the west one half of Lot 12 Section 3 as deeded to
the State of California and described in Book 924 at Page 73, official
records of E1 Dorado County, California. The easement centerline then
bears north 00° 04' 20" west 2760.62 feet to the point of termination
said point of termination being on the southwesterly right-of-way line
of A1 Tahoe Boulevard as described in Book 798 at Page 250, official
records of E1 Dorado County, California, from which point of termina-
tion a three quarter inch capped iron pipe at the northwest corner
of Lot 14 of Section 3 bears north 51o 16' 11" west 1751.21 feet.
The side lines of said easement to be shortened or lengthened to begin
at said parcel as deeded to the State of California and terminate at
said right-of-way line of A1 Tahoe Boulevard.
EXHIBIT "B"
~,~062 ~3'15
~WER
EXIST LTCC PR~TY Li.E
NEW-I -~~E EXPANDED
~TH T~1
HYD~T~_ I ~
~~ ~. . I
SITI~ PLAN ~NID PIPELINE
SCALE: I"= I000~ ±
FIGURE 1
(Shee't 1 of 2)
3
·
ooo
STPUD COLLEGE WEL_L
FIGURE 4
COLLEGE WELL
ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING
13
LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NUMBER 13--1981/82
MODIFICATION OF EASEMENT NUMBER 4 GRANTED
TO THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
RESOLVED,
the Board of Trustees of the Lake Tahoe Community
College District has previously granted an ease-
ment to the South Tahoe Public Utility District
to provide for the installation of utility lines,
~and
a wider easement is necessary to allow completion
· of the proposed utility line addition,
be it
that the Board of Trustees of the Lake Tahoe Community
College hereby grants a modification to easement
number 4 from 26 feet to 31 feet to the South Tahoe
Public Utility District as described in their letter
dated February 2, 1982 and attached drawing.
This Resolution passed at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees
held at the Lake Tahoe Community College, Room 401, in the city of
South Lake Tahoe, California on March 4, 1982.
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
ABSENT: 1 (Whitten)
~~ March 4, 1982
a esW. Du '
L'N D OF OCUM N1
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
FOR APPROVAL
June 2, 2005
Action Item 6.e
Payroll 5-25-05
Total Payroll
BNY Western Trust Company
Cost Containment'- health care payments
Lasalle
Hatch & Parent -legal services
Total Vendor EFT
Accounts Payable Checks Sewer Fund
Accounts Payable Checks Water Fund
Accounts Payable Checks Self-funded Ins
Accounts Payable Checks Grant Funds
Total Accounts Payable
Grand Total
291,082.19
291,082.19
846,487.5O
53,324.25
156,572.80
0.00
1 ,O56,384.55
114,881.98
109,427.34
47.15
92,892.25
317,248.72
1,664,715.46
Payroll EFTs & Checks
5-25-05
EFT
CHK
EFT
CHK
CHK
EFT
EFT
CHK
EFT
CHK
AFLAC Medical & Dependent Care
CA Employment Taxes & W/H
Federal Employment Taxes & W/H
CalPERS Contributions
John Hancock Pension Loan Pmts
Great West Deferred Comp
Stationary Engineers Union Dues
United Way Contributions
Employee Direct Deposits
Employee Paychecks
894.90
13 273.65
70 931.56
20.361.09
4 997.21
12 962.57
1 477.80
105.00
152,157.51
13,920.90
Total 291,082.19
00
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/20 2005 - 06/02/2005
THU, MAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -i: - -1�: �, 3L- -lcc. CNSilE_ -- -jam: 338703 #J005- - - -pic 09 <1.07 > - -i p rt i
Default Selection: Check
Verrbr Narre
AFLAC
AWWA
Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: , F-14, RV, VH
Aco3unt # DspartrrEnt
10 -00 -2538 GENERAL &ISJRATTCN
10 -38 -6250 CL TCMER SERVICE
20 -38 -6250 CZ.SICMR SERVICE
A -1 CHEMICAL INC 10 -00 -0422 COAL & AEMINISIRATICN
A -1 C E4DC hL INC 10 -00 -0422 COAL &AEMINISIRATICN
ALPEN SIERRA CD1.i Q1vPANY
ALPHA Al\ALYIICAL INC.
ALSEURY, MIRY
PP ERICAS - 90 LAKE TARO
ARAIvARK LNIFORNI SERVICES
ATISIO, LANCE
10 -00 -6520 GENERAL & PEDENTIS RAT CN
20 -00 -6520 (FERAL & ALM NISIRATICN
20 -07 -6110 LAB3RATDRY
10 -37 -6200 INECDATTCN SYSTEMS
20 -37 -6200 Il TICN SYSIEIv6
10 -28 -6360
10 -00 -2518
20 -38 -4405
20 -38 -4405
ALPINE CDCNIY
GENERAL & CZSICMER SERVICE
QJSICNER SERVICE
Descr-ipticn
AFLAC FEE LE7 ETICN
Check 'Ibtal :
LUES M a- I ' /CER IFICATI
Ih1ES ID VD" IP /canaFICATI
Check Tbtal:
IAL SJPPLIES INVENICIR.
Check 'Ibtal :
JANTEDREAL SUPPLES IMADNICR
Check Total:
Verrbr Tbtal:
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
NENTIC JN3
PROPANE
1 OA Ne,.
Go I I1
Check Tbtal:
Check Tbtal:
Check Tbtal:
Check Tbtal:
�
PA E
Check Tbtal:
CJCNIRACILAL SERVICES
Atrcunt Check # 'Tape
110.00
110.00 00060054 NW
75.00
75.00
150.00 00060055 M'
396.46
396.46 00060056 M'
536.63
536.63 00060057 NW
933.09
80.50
80.50
161.00 00060058 NW
615.00
615.00 00060059 MAI
93.50
93.50
187.00 00060060 NW
346.93
346.93 00060061 NW
1,128.65
136.13
1,264.78 00060062 NW
832.28
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT O F CLAIMS R E P O R T 05/20 2005 - 06/02/2005
THU, Mg1Y 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -mg: : ' - -leg: (� 0L - -loc: GE1'1E - -- -fob: 338703 #J005--- -p:cg: 09 <1.07 > - -fit id:
I fai it t Selecticn: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW, BW, RV, VH
Vencbr Nacre 1 xr i t # ant
AXELSCN IRON SHOP
B S K I LYTTCAL LABS
PACIIELER, JcN C
ELY PaCS
BERRY- HINZKEY INETb'IPI
BI STATE PROPANE
BINS
IsnIRIALS
F IlF R BB N TII` P PERSCIA\EL
urrV RIBBCN TEMP PERSONNEL
10 -04 -6022 HEAVY NAINIE7
20 -07 -6110 LABORATCRY
10 -02 -6250 REPS
10 -06 -6652 OPERATTCNE
10 -00 -0415
20 -02 -4630
10 -01 -6360
20 -00 -6360
20 -01 -6052
10 -28 -6042
20 -38 -4405
20 -38 -4405
C SAL & ALNIINISIRATICN
INCERGROLND REPAIR
COAL & ALM NISIR TICN
t1DRREPAIR
ALPINE Q15ICMER SERVICE
CIb'1L? ER SERVICE
Description
Check Tbtal:
SB R Check Total:
NENTTLRIl3
Check Total:
DUES/N ZOUPS/ TCATI
Check Tbtal:
BIOS= DISPOSAL Q SIS
Check Tbtal:
OIL & LIERIC ANIS
Check Tbtal:
PROPANE
PROPANE
Check Total:
Pia., COVERS & YANKEES
GUMS &
Check Tbtal:
OCNTRALTI.AL SERVICE'S
Check Total:
CENIRAC'U L SERVICES
Check Tbtal:
Vencbr Total:
Anumt Check # Type
832.28 00060063 NW
24.78
24.78 00060064 NW
180.00 00060065 NW
60.00 00060066 NW
00060067 NW
180.00
60.00
1,737.12
1,737.12
3,153.33
40.54
3,193.87
21.95
140.00
161.95
00060068 NW
00060069 NW
243.36
338.79
582.15 00060070 NW
2,700.73
2,700.73 00060071 NW
774.93
774.93 00060072 NW
3,475.66
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/20 2005 - 06/02/2005
TU[J, NAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -req: THERESA---leg: GL JL- -loo: CNSE1E - -- -jab: 338703 #J005--- -prag: 09 <1.0'7 > - -sort id:
Defai 11 t Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,HW, RV,VH
Vender Nine kzz nt # Department
BDISE CASE
BJISE CASCAEE
CDW -GCCRP
CDW - G OZ P
CWEA
10 -00 -0428 GENERAL & ATMINISTRATICN
10 -00 -0428 GOAL & AIIvDNISIRATICN
20 -37 -4840
10 -37 -4840
10 -37 -4840
20 -37 -4840
INFICRINATICN SYSTEMS
INECIRMAT'ICN SYSIflE
INFICFMTICN SYSTEMS
10 -07 -6250 IABURATCRY
CALIF DEFT OF COAL SERVICES 20 -02 -8564 REPS
20 -05 -8521 EIJUIRMENT REPAIR
CALIF LEFT OF HEALTH SERVICES 10 -06 -6250 OPERATIONS
CALIF WATER RCS
CA,LIFC VIA C7 /E1 NICET
90 -98 -8828 EXPCRT PIPELINE GRANT
10 -00 -4810 CORAL & AD IINISIPATICN
20 -00 -4810 GENERAL & ALNIINISIlRATICN
10 -07 -4810 LABCRA'LRY
Eescripticn
OFFICE SUPPLIES INVENICRY
Check 'Ibtal :
OFFICE SUPPLIES INVENICRY
Check Tbtal:
Vendor 'Ibta1 :
DISTRICT OCMFUIER SUPPLIES
DISTRICT CCMFUTfR SUPPLIES
Check Tbta1:
DISTRICT CCMPJIER SUPPLIES
DISTRICT CXMFUIER SUPPLIES
Check 'Ibtal :
Vendor Ibtal:
E ES/N SHIPS /CE 'IC ATI
Check Tbtal:
REPL VEHICLE #41
AEDL TRUCK EQUIP REPAIR
Check Total:
DUES/ME RS[IIPS /CERTTFTCATT
Check Tbtal:
BLME PHS III LPPS-CMFGRaN
Check Tbtal:
FOSPEE EXPENSES
FCSIASE EIS
a
Amxmt Check # Type
504.90
504.90 00060122 NW
27.16
27.16 00060123 MW
532.06
649.13
649.09
1,298.22 00060074 ICI
199.10
184.03
383.13 00060075 MAI
1,681.35
151.50
151.50 00060076 NW
459.70
758.71
1,218.41 00060077 NW
80.00
80.00 00060078 NW
70,000.00
70,000.00 00060079 NW
8.75
8.75
15.29
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 • PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT
05/ 2005 - 06/02/2005 QE �EPTHI, M Y 26, 2005, 9 :56 A II A-- -leg: i CNSEL - -- -jab: 338703 #J005--- -pog: 09 <1.0> - -iort 4 C
•
Defai it t Selecticn: Check
V±r Narre
Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,HW,RV,VH
Acczunt # Departrrent
CAPITDL TAEIEWCRES TIC
CARCLLO EMINEE RS
CP,RSCN PUMP
Q11E IS
20 -07 -4810 LABORATORY
20 -29 -8574 ENGINEER=
10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT I1'ICN
20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT ILTICN
90 -98 -8828 EXPORT PIPELINE GRANT
10 -29 -7040 ENGINEEREN3
20 -02 -6050 PUMPS
10 -22 -4405 HINAN RESCt. S
20 -22 -4405 HLVAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
COST CCNT INMENT MI5 INC .30 -00 -6741 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE
QILLEN, JANE W
COVER CXNPANY TIC
L VI
DICK'S FULLER -
10 -21 -6621 ALMENISIRATICN
20 -21 -6621 ALMENISIRAT'ICN
20 -27 -6660 DISTRICT IIICN
20 -07 -6110 L B RAIL Y
10 -04 -6021 I•EAVYMAINIENAME
Dascriptia1
PCSIAE EXPENSES
WELL, BAYV ER
C1dt Tbtal:
CONE RA MAL SERVICES
OZNIRACIUAL SERVICES
Check lbtal:
BL11NE PITS III LPPS -N
8CDILM HYR X3IL RITE CLNVEPSI
Check Total:
WELLS
Check Tbtal:
CaNIRAC]11AL SERVICES
0:N1 RAC'ILAL SERVICES
Check Total:
AUNT NISIRA7.ICN rr ;
Check Total:
INCENTIVE & RErtG TI.'ICN Mat
I! JC NI'IVE & REI:OGNITICN PRGR
Check 'Total:
WATER CCNSERVATICN EX
Check Total:
KNITCRIM
Check Total:
PRIMARY E PMENr k Total:
Amxmt Check # Type
22.25
5.36
60.40 00060080 NW
27.50
27.50
55.00 00060081 NW
22,892.25
177.50
23,069.75 00060082 NW
3,097.00
3,097.00 00060083 NW
30.80
30.80
61.60 00060084 NW
47.15
47.15 00060085 WI
25.00
25.00
50.00 00060086 NW
1,680.15
1,680.15 00060087 NW
103.00
103.00 00060088 NW
144.51
144.51 00060089 MAI
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/20 2005- 06/02/2005
THU, MAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM --zap 'IIEA -- -leg: GL QE1'1E - -- -jab: 338703 #J005--- -pzrog: CC115509 <1.07 > - -wort i
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: MW,HW,RV,VH
Veni r Narre Acoamt # Department
DRIVER AT T IANT INSURANCE
10 -00 -0301 GENERAL & ALNBNISIRATTCN
20 -00 -0301 COAL & POUNISIpATI N
E & M ELECTRIC AND NACHINERY 10 -37 -6030 DIECRvinsTICN SYSIFNS
20 -37 -6030 IlTICN SYSTEMS
E N S RESCURCES INC
EL EGEA O 03CNIY
FE EX
FISHER SCIENITFIC
10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INFCENATICN
20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT IliTICN
10 -02 -6650 PUMPS
10 -00 -4810 SAL & ALNIINISIRATICN
20 -00 -4810 GENERAL & RYINISIl TCN
10 -37 -7051 INFORMAITCN =E ms
10 -39 -4810 FIl..E
20 -39 -4810 FTNANCE
10 -07 -4760 LAB RPAc RY
20 -07 -4760 LABORATORY
G L I INIERNATICNAL - Iii CO 10 -07 -4760 LABORAICEY
20-07-4760 I EY
MR IA EXCAUATIM3 & PAVIN3,DCN 20 -29 -8401 E! IlNEERIlM
GEOLRANS
Il�
10 -37 -8565 INECRuATICN SYSTEMS
Descxipticn
INSURANCE PREPAID
INSURANCE PREPAID
Check Total:
SERVICE CCNIRACTS
SERVICE CCNERACIS
Check Tbtal:
GCNIRACTUAL SERVICES
C N R CTUAL SERVICES
Check Tbtal:
OPERA= PENS
Check Total:
PCSIAC
=ENE SYSTEM
PCS= EXPENSES
STEE EKINSES
Check Total:
LABCRATCRY SUPPLIES
IAB RATCRY SUPPLIES
Check Total:
IABCIRATORY SUPPLIES
LAB RATORY SUPPLIES
Check Total:
QS'IQ 1ER SERVICE CENTER
Check Total:
GIS IMPIENENTATTON
-
• / 4J11.`j'
Amxmt Check # Type
58.00
58.00
116.00
2,685.48
2,685.50
5,370.98
2,581.55
2,581.55
5,163.10
303.00
303.00 00060093 .141
00060090 Ma
00060091 NW
00060092 NW
5.50
5.50
24.46
7.47
7.47
50.40 00060094 144
00060095 M'7
48.04
36.04
84.08 00060096 Ma
4,277.91
4,277.91 00060097 NW
7,365.33
368.54
325.84
694.38
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/2.0/2005- 06/02/20. CK�
�J, MAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -re: THERESA---leg: C � JL- -loo: QVSl'1E-- - -jcb: 338703 #J005--- -plug: CQ609 <1.07 > --
Default t Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check 'Iipes : M' , HW, RV, VH
Vendor Noire Account # Departrnent
CRATTNA PACIFIC INC
HAD BarED LOCKSNb'IH
ISINC
MST Y- MINIS ThJc
INIERST IE SAFELY & SUPPLY
J & L PRO KEEN INC
10 -04 -6041
20 -02 -6041
20 -37 -6200
10 -37 -6200
20 -27 -6660
HEAVY NAIlVIDE
RPM
INECRATICN SYSTEMS
INECEMATICN SYSTEMS
DISTRICT IlICN
10 -00 -0425 SAL & ALNIINISTRATICN
10 -39 -6077 FINANCE
10 -00 -0421 GENERAL & A11�NISIRATICN
10 -39 -6074 FINANCE
20 -39 -6074 FINANCE
JEE'FERSCN PIIOI' FILIAL 10 -00 -2539 COAL & AII'NISIRATICN
JCNES, J R
10 -19 -6200 ECARD OF DDS
20 -19 -6200 BOARD OF DIRKS
Descx'ipticn
BUIIDIN
BUEDINM
TRA
'IRA
ID 1 es
It.
Check 'Ibtal :
Check Total:
Check Tbtal:
aATICN
/ '1'Ibtal:
TAiniTER. CCNSERVATTCN EXPENSE
Check Total:
SAFETY SUPPLIES
INVIHNICRY FREIGHT /DISCIaNIS
SEDP SUPPLY
Check Total:
JANTICRIAL SERVICES
JANTICRIAL SERVICES Total:
ISM TERM DISABII,ITy, i.NICN
Check Total:
mammal
Check Total:
Amount Cineck # I ape
7,365.33 00060098 Mr
442.86
442.86 00060099 NW
8.13
8.13 00060100 Mei
1,062.50
1,062.50
2,125.00 00060101 NW
275.46
275.46 00060102 NW
131.03
27.34
96.98
255.35 00060103 MAT
1,473.50
1,473.50
2,947.00 00060104 MST
1,947.70
1,947.70 00060105 NW
104.03
104.03
208.06 00060106 NW
00060107 M, 7
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/2012005- 06/02/2005
THU, NAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -rnq: 'II A- - -le3: GL JL - -loc: MITE- -- -jab: 338703 #J005 - -- prcg: Ci(.509 <1.07 >-- report id:
c
Default SP1 ectici: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: Mnl, HW, RV, VH
Vendor Narre Amount # wit Description Amount C1 edk # Type
LIFT EQUIPMENT CERT. CO. INC. 10 -04 -6041 HEAVY NAINIENAN;E BUILD]NE
r,rrTY'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 20 -05 -6011 DIIFMENT REPAIR
LIVE WIRE MEDIA PASS 20 -27 -6660 DISIRICT INFORANTIM
M W H LABS 20 -07 -6110 LABORATORY
NAASS MIDWEST 20 -02 -6050 REPS
NARD, MIKE 10 -05 -6200
20 -05 -6200
a• 1• !�
9. 1• ID
REPAIR
REPAIR
NE NAS ER CSR SUPPLY CO 10 -04 -6041 HEAVY NAINIENANCE
NE FASTER CARR SUPPLY 00 20 -02 -6073 RNPS
MCIEL =ACRES INC 10 -37 -7051 INECEVATICN SYSTEMS
MJITCN INC SIRIES INC 10 -04 -6022 HEAVY MIINIENANZE
N I G P NCRIBERH CALIF' CHAP= 10 -39 -6250 FINANCE
Check Total:
AUICK I'.IVE
Check Total:
1AATE2IATICN EXPENSE
NCNTI RI
WFT T S
Check Tbta1:
Cherk Total:
Check Total:
700.00
700.00 00060108 NW
534.98
534.98 00060109 NW
336.00
336.00 00060110 NW
225.00
225.00 00060111 NW
168.19
168.19 00060112 MN
TRA eti CN -36.00
TRA -36.00
Check Tbtal: -72.00 00059874 RV
BJUDINM
129.71
Check Total: 129.71 00060113 NW
SMALL 'IWLS 376.23
Check Total: 376.23 00060114 NW
Vendor Total: 505.94
TELEPHONE SYSTEM heck Total: 2,264.21 C 264.21 00060115 NW
SEDONDNRY EQUIPMENT 41.63
Check Total: 3 00060116 NW
DJES/NES'EItPS /CERTIFTC ATI 12.50
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/20/2005- 06/02/2005 8
T [J, MAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -I ' p : - -leg: GL JL--loc: CNSTIE-- - -Jcb: 338703 #J005 - - - - cg: 09 <1.0 > - -rep rt id: CK(
Default Selection: Clerk Stork ID: AP ;
vendor Nate
Check Types: M4,HR,RV,VH
Acccurit #
20 -39 -6250
NEVALA DIVISION OF FCRESIRY 10 -28 -4405
NEW RESOURCES GROUP INC
NOLPN, TIM
N:RUCN, LARRY B
R SUPPLY
RPDIO SHPLK
RICCA CHEMICAL AL CID
RIMER, TIMMY J
S B C
20 -27 -6660
10 -39 -4820
20 -39 -4820
10 -03 -6200
20 -03 -6200
20 -01 -6052
10 -37 -4840
20 -37 -4840
10 -07 -4760
20 -07 -4760
10 -29 -6200
20 -29 -6200
10 -00 -6320
Department
FINANCE
ALPINE CIJfNIY
DISTRICT INKRNATICN
FINANCE
FAME
ELECIRIC7IL SHOP
ELECTRICAL SHOP
UNEEPSEUND REPAIR
INECEM4TTCN SYSTEN6
INETICN SYSTEMS
LAB RAKEY
LPG
EMINEERIM
ENMEMIl3
COAL & ALMINISIRAZTCN
Description
D(EsAv riEERsERPS /C TFTCAIT
Check Tbtal:
CC NURACTU AL SERVICES
Check Total:
VAR CENSERVATICN EXPENSE
Check Total:
C'ICE SUPPLIES
CFFTCE SUPPLIES Check 'Total :
TRA
TRA
2 lid 1 es
2 0 t es
CN
Check Tbtal:
PIPE, COVERS, & MA-L7LES
Check Total:
DISTRICT CTiER SUPPLIES
DISTRICT OCMPUIER SUPPLIES
Check Total:
LAS SUPPLIES
Check IABORATURY SUPPLIES
Tbtal:
'IRA PHEUCATICN
TRA
Check Total :
2 0 I es
2 0 1 es
SIGNAL CHARGES
Check Total:
Anr unt Check # TYPe
12.50
25.00 00060117 W7
5,007.19
5,007.19 00060118 Mai
2,643.00
2,643.00 00060119 Md
13.09
13.08
26.17 00060120 DV
68.00
68.00
136.00 00060121 NW
231.02
231.02 00060124 NW
30.12
30.11
60.23 00060125 IVW
12.16
7.00
19.16 00060126 NW
195.00
195.00
390.00 00060127 Ma
128.68
128.68 00060130 NW
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/2012005 - 06/02/2005 9
THU, NARY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -�q: ' - -1a3: CL 3L- -lo : Q15.1.E-- - -jcb: 338703 #3005--- -prog: Qt509 d.07 >- -report id: CK�
Default Selectian: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,HW,RV,VH
Ven r Nacre Acocu t # Departrre t
S BC /MCI
S B C Pacific Bell
SCCJIT SPE SALTY CASES
SCIDIT, BILL
10 -00 -6310
10 -02 -6310
10 -21 -6310
10 -39 -6310
20 -02 -6310
20 -21 -6310
20 -39 -6310
IIMPS GENERAL & ALMENISERATICN
LMENISIRATICN
F.IICE
KMPS
AIIMINIS RA ICN
FQE
20 -37 -4405 INFORMDITICN SYSIENB
10 -37 -4405 Il TT N SYSIEM3
20 -37 -8569 I FCE TICN SYSTEMS
10 -06 -6024 OPERA_ICNS
20 -38 -4405 CL1SICNIER SERVICE
SIERRA FOOTHILL IAA 10 -07 -6110 LABORATORY
20 -07 -6110 LABORATORY
SIERRA PACIFIC MAIER
SMITEI LESIC T C 3JP
10 -00 -6330 GENERAL & ALMENISTRATICN
10 -00 -6740 COAL & ADMINISTRATION
20 -00 -6330 CORAL & ALN1ThJIS RAT'ICN
20 -29 -8401 ENIMEERINB
sum INI E NQaSPAPFR ASENC.'Y 10 -21 -4830 Al:MINISMAITCN
20 -21 -4830 AIM NISI1ATICN
Descripticn
TEXIIRICNE
TEL EMCNE
r EP :NE
TLEEP :NE
TELERENE
Check Tbtal:
CCNIRACIUAL SERVI�
FIBER VAN LIAR SEBJPS
Check Tbtal:
FURNACE E TCheck Total :
CCNIRACITAL SERVICES
Check Tbtal:
MNT'ICRIM
KNITCRIM
Check Tbtal:
T3 FC IRicriY
SiRbkle LIGHTINU EXPENSE
T3 EC'TRICTIY
Check Tbtal:
CUSIC 1ER SERVICE C VIER
Check Total:
aESCRIFTICNS E=SE
SLESCRIPr1CNS EKPENSE
Amzu t Check # Type
94.28
108.2222
15.50
106.61
8.22
15.50
355.17 00060128 NW
1,695.50
1,695.50
4,492.00
7,883.00 00060129 Ma
67.88
67.88 00060131 WI
438.62
438.62 00060132 NW
165.00
48.50
213.50 00060133 NW
63,053.54
16.59
23,031.73
86,101.86 00060134 MAI
24,550.06
24,550.06 00060135 NW
53.02
53.01
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/2012005 - 06/02/2005 10
THUT, MAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM - -mg: - - -1a3: C� 3L - -loc: Q�1�1E-- - -3ab: 338703 #J005--- -prcg: C 09 <1.07 > - -fort id: CRC
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,I4AI,RV,VH
Vear Nacre Account # Department
SOUTH 'IAIEE PLLMBEG SUPPLY
OU THWEST CAS
S] PD INSURANCE COMPANY
STAPLES
SDATELINE OFFICE SUPPLY
10 -04 -6023 HEAVY MAINTENANCE
10 -02 -6051 PUMPS
20 -02 -6050 PUMPS
10 -00 -6350
20 -00 -6350
10 -00 -2531
10 -07 -4312
20 -07 -4312
10 -21 -4312
20 -21 -4312
10 -27 -4312
20 -27 -4312
10 -28 -4312
10 -29 -4312
20 -29 -4312
10 -38 -4312
20 -38 -4312
10 -39 -4312
20 -39 -4312
GENERAL & ATMINISIRATICN
COAL & ATMENISIRATICN
GENERAL
T & AI SIRTCN
LABCIRA
/AEC 2ATCRY
AEMINISTRATICN
ATMINISIRATICN
DISTRICT INECRNATTCN
DISTRICT INFCRVAITCN
ALPINE O3LNIY
ENMNEERINTh
ENS_
CUSICNER SERVICE
FINANCE
FINANCE
10 -01 -6052 L1 ND REPAIR
20 -21 -4820 AII l NISIRATICN
10 -21 -4820 AEMINISIRATICN
I escripticn
ILL
F SLEW
1AIE
as
NATURAL CAS
NATURAL CAS
Laz
LCi3 TERM
LCI\B TERM!
LCI3 'MN
LCIZ TERM
Laz TERM
LQ3 TERM
LCI3 TERM
LQ3 TERM
La\U TERM
L N3 TERM
LIZ TERM
LQc TERM
LC1N TERM
Check Total:
Check Total:
Check Total:
DISABILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISABI TTY,
DIMBILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISAB]L 1,
DISABI TTY,
DISABILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISABILITY,
DISABI
MGMT
M'MT
M:MT
M:MT
KNIT
M3 r
M3vII'
MgvIT
M:MT
MUM'
Total
PIPE, COVERS, & NI?DLES
Check Total:
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Check Total:
Amxmt Check # Type
106.03
47.62
162.96
5.06
215.64
119.69
198.10
317.79
1,492.03
6.90
6.90
6.90
6.90
5.06
5.05
14.58
0.54
0.54
11.76
11.76
16.61
16.60
1,602.13
38.68
38.68
59.33
59.33
118.66
00060136 Md
00060137 MW
00060138 NW
00060139 MAT
00060140 WI
00060141 WI
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/20 2005 - 06/02/2005 11
THU, MY 26, 2005, 9:56 PM - -req: TH RESA- - -1eg: CL JL - -1oc: CNSI' - -- -jab: 338703 #J005-- - -prcg: 09 <1.07 >-- report id: C��
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW, HW, RV, VH
Vender Nacre Aooa nt # Departrrent
SUBSITIUIE PERSCNS1EL &
SWAIN, ova,
TRPA
TRPA
TRPA
TRPA
MEE ELI]EPRINr
TAME CARSCN AREA NEC
MICE r'h CCNIRDL,
TAME M7[NlAIN NEIA S
10 -01 -4405 L1 ND REPAIR
20 -01 -4405 LEEEPGRaND REPAIR
10 -37 -6200 INFORMATICN SYSTEMS
20 -37 -6200 I1TCN SYSIRNS
20 -29 -8574 FI3IlNEERIlN3
20 -29 -8574 ENGINEERIN3
20 -29 -7048 EN3IlNEERI N3
20 -29 -8548 EN3INEERM
20 -29 -8548 ENGINEERM
20 -38 -4930 C E'ICNSR SERVICE
10 -06 -6075 OPEf2ATIC E
20 -27 -6660 DISTRICT INFCMATTag
I scripticn
OC7NIRACILRL SERVICES
CCNIRACTLAL SERVICES
Check 'Ibtal :
IRA
TRA TCN
Check 'Ibtal :
D ID I C.
.1i I'.} 1 e.
WELL, EAYVIEW
Check Tbtal:
WELL, EAYVIEW
Check Tbtal:
WIEN, JCIN3CN ELVD
Check Tbtal:
WIRLN, HWY 50 REND TO SJ
Check Tbtal:
Vendar Total:
WIRLN, FblY 50 REND TO SJ
Check Total.:
AL6 /Lam NDITCES
Check Tbtal:
SAFETY EQUIPMENT/PHYSICALS
Check Tbtal:
WATER QCNISE2VATICN EZPENSE
Check Total:
Aunt Check # Type
1,824.00
912.00
2,736.00 00060142 !'W
58.83
58.82
117.65 00060143 MAT
- 435.00
- 435.00 00058370 RV
435.00
435.00 00060144 Ma
2,173.00
2,173.00 00060145 NW
2,483.00
2,483.00 00060146 NW
4,656.00
75.43
75.43 00060147 W7
241.57
241.57 00060148 NW.
465.48
465.48 00060149 Ma
225.00
225.00 00060150 NW
South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/26/05 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/20/2005- 06402/2005 12
'MU, NAY 26, 2005, 9:56 AM --rag: THERESA---leg: GL JL - -lcc: C EUE - -- -fob: 338703 #J005 - -- pxog: 09 <1.0 > - -xepa t id: C PC
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types : Ma, HW, RV, VH
V&idrar Narre Acoa mt # Depattrrent
TAHOE PRINT1N3 10 -01 -6052 INCERJUID REPAIR
VALLEY TAHOE ELECTRIC SUPPLY 20 -03 -6050 ELECTRICAL SHOP
ICERNEY,
UNTIED TM E INC
V W R CCRPORATICN
VERI70N
INUJS RIFS INC
ZINC
WEST C7 ST IIMIlNEERED
WESTERN NEVAI A SUPPLY
10 -04 -6200 HEAVY NAINTEEMNCE
10 -00 -0421 GENERAL & ALMENTSIRATICN
20 -07 -4760 LABORATORY
10 -07 -4760 LABORATORY
10 -28 -6310 ALPINE C NIY
10 -01 -6071 L1CN) REPAIR
10 -03 -6071 ELECTRICAL SHOP
10 -03 -6041 ELECTRICAL AL SHOP
20 -03 -6041 ELECTRICAL SHOP
PROCUCIS 10 -04 -6023 HEAVY NV ET N ;
20 -38 -6045 CUSICNE12 SERVICE
20 -02 -6050 PIMPS
10 -01 -6071 ENCERGROUND REPAIR
10 -04 -6023 HEAVY NAINTENANCE
DescTipticn
PIPE, COVERS, & NABS
Check Total:
WU TS
Ole& Total:
'IRA /EC UZATICN
Check Total:
SHOP SUPPLY INVFNILRY
Check Total:
IABCRATORY SUPPLIES
LABORATORY SUPPLIES
IFS
Check Total:
TET EP ENE
Check Total:
SHOP SUPPLIES
Check Total:
SEDP SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
BUU DIIM
Check Total:
FILTER EccuP /arc Total:
TALES METERS
SHOP
FILTERSUEIPITHIG
Amount Check # Type
42.08
42.08 00060151 MrI
2,796.60
2,796.60 00060152 Ma
29.44
29.44 00060153 MAT
70.04
70.04 00060154 NW
59.27
69.26
128.53 00060155 NW
159.52
159.52 00060156 NW
241.51
241.51 00060157 M4
243.38
501.73
215.97
961.08 00060158 M4
221.58
221.58 00060159 MS
13,629.30
134.58
158.53
117.76
South 'I'ahce P.U.D.
TILT, MAY 26, 2005, 9:56
I fai >1 t Selection: Check
Vendor Nrre
05/26/05 PAYMENT OF C L AIMS REPORT 05/2012005 - 06/02/20 Id:
ALA
l3
AM - -req: ']---1: C� JL - -lcc: CN51'1±-- - -fob: 338703 W005 - -- -fig: 09 <1.07>--report
Stock ID: AP ; check Types : Ma, HW, RV, VH
Amount # apartment
10 -02 -6051 AMPS
20 -01 -6073 LIPID REPAIR
20 -01 -6052 iIECI\ID REPAIR
10 -04 -6022 HEAVY MINIM=
WOLF LCD CELT & BACKEILW 10 -38 -4405 CSICNE R SERVICE
20 -38 -4405 CLSICt SERVICE
ZEE MEDICAL INC
MINER, DAVE
ZYNAX
10 -01 -6075
20 -01 -6075
10 -02 -6075
20 -02 -6075
10 -03 -6075
20 -03 -6075
10 -04 -6075
10 -06 -6075
10 -38 -6075
20 -38 -6075
10 -39 -6075
20 -39 -6075
INCERSTUND RE=
I.NCERGRatID REPAIR
AMPS
Ef PIMPS tO L SE$3P
ELECTRICAL TRKAL SEE
HE VY NN 'E
CUSICM3R _ CE
CLERMat SERVICE
FINANCE ETMITE
10 -28 -6042 ALPINE C7fNT'Y
20 -07 -6110 LAB RA1t EY
Descripticai
AMP sI'AATICNS
S ER s
EIZOIRENT
Check Zbtal:
CCNIRAGT[RL SERVICES
CCNIRACR A,L SERVICES
Check Tbtal:
SAFELY
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFETY SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFELY
m• • !m PHYSICALS
me • ;D PHYSICALS
me • ,a PHYSICALS
m• / PHYSICALS
m• Rv1ENrPHYSICALS
mP • � Pf PHYSICALS
YSICA S
m• • m PHYSICALS
m• • ��m PHYSICALS
a• ANN!' /PHYSICALS
(heck Tbtal:
GROUID1S & NAIlVIEMNCE
C1�eck ' Tbtal :
KNTICRILZ
Check k 'Ibtal :
Grand Tbtal:
Amunt Check # Zype
18.13
16.03
31.12
14,172.60 00060160 MCI
162.50
162.50
325.00 00060161 Ma
35.32
35.32
20.05
20.05
10.79
10.79
48.47
34.75
9.11
9.10
8.98_
8.98
251.71 00060162 NW
4,290.00
4,290.00 00060163 MAT
674.00
674.00 00060164 NW
317,248.72
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H..~olbrlg
Direccor$
Tom Com'ce
James R, Jonss
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Duane Wallace
EHc ~chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614, www. stpud,us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.a
TO:
FROM:
Board of Directors
Richard Solbrig, General Manager,
Paul Sciuto, Assistant General Manager/Engineer
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (two cases)
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct legal counsel.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding anticipation of
litigation.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED~ON:
GENERAL MANAGER: YESz"f,/M NO
CATEGORY:
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
~iehard lq. 9olbrlg
D/rectors
Tom Comt~
James I~ donee
Mar~ Lou Mo~baeher
Duane Wallac~
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14.b
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
Board of Directors
Richard H. Solbrig/General Manager, Gary Kvistad/Legal Counsel
June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing
litigation: STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land in Alpine County, California; United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento Division, Case No. CIV S-02-
0238 MCE JFM.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED AC~ON:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES /,/.~/ NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H.
Directors
Tom Comt~
Jame~ I~ Jone~
Mary Lou Mo~Pacher
Duane Wallace
Eric E~chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474, Fax 530 541-0614, www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14.c
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Jim Hoggatt/Construction Manager/Engineer,
Gary Kvistad/Legal Counsel
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct legal counsel.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(c) of the California Government Code,
Closed SessiOn may be held for a conference with legal counsel regarding anticipated
litigation: Pioneer Trail waterline replacement near Filter Plant
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CO.CURRE.CE W.. REOUES*ED
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES?~c~~_
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Water
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Rtchard H. 5olbrig
D/reccor$
Tom Comt~
James R. Jones
Mary Lou Mo~baeher
Puane Wallace
Eric ,%haler
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe e CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14.d
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
Board of Directors
Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager
June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing
litigation: Meyers Landfill Site - United States of America vs. El Dorado County and City
of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No. S-01-1520 LKK
GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ,~TION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES ~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES ~ ~{~ NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H, ,~olbrig
Directors
Tom Corn~
James R. Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Duane Wallace
Edc 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · SoUth Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.e
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
Board of Directors
Executive Committee (Schafer/Wallace)
June 2, 2005
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Conference with Labor Negotiators
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION' Direct negotiators.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54957.6(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held regarding contract negotiations for unrepresented
employee position.
Unrepresented Employee Position: General Manager
Agency Negotiators: Executive Committee, Board of Directors
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED~)TION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YESES..
CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~
NO
NO
CATEGORY: General