AP 05-04-06SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
"Basic Services for a Complex World"
REGULAR, BOARD MEETING AGENDA
Thursday, May 4, 2006
2:00 P.M.
District Office
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, California
Eric W. Schafer, President
BOARD MEMBERS
Duane Wallace, Vice President
Ja~es.~;.~ne~. P!r~tor M~:.L~u~M~s~r,~!re. ct~[ To~C0mte, Director
1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (Short non-agenda items that are within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the District. Five-minute limit. No action will betaken.)
CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR
ADOPTION OF,,C, ONSENT ,CALENDAR (Any item can be discussed and considered
separately upon request.)
S. ,C, ONSE,NT, ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR ACTION I DISCUSSION
6. ITEMS FOR I~OARD ACTION. ....... RE,(~UE[$TEO BOARD ACTION
Pg. 53
Economic Analysis, Proposition 50
IRWMP Grant
(Paul Sciuto)
Approve Proposal from Kennedy/
Jenks Consultants to Prepare the
District's Economic Analysis that is
Required for the Proposition 50
Integrated Regional Water Manage-
ment Plan (IRWMP) Grant, in the
Amount of $30,000
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - MAY 4, 2006 ' PAGE - 2 -
Pg. 65
2006 Asphalt Patching Services
(Randy Curtis)
Award Bid to the Lowest Respon-
sive, Responsible Bidder (Bid results
will be presented at the Board meeting)
Pg. 69
Pg, 71
Indian Creek Reservoir
(Request to Appear Before the Board
Received from Ed James, Carson
Water Subconservancy District)
Payment of Claims
Consider Subconservany's Request
to Use Spdng Runoff to Increase
Water Storage
Approve Payment in the Amount of
$1,157,900.32
¸7.
BOARD MEMBER STANDING CQMMITTEE REP,O, ,R,,T.~
(Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
a. Water & Wastewater Operations Committee (Jones / Comte)
b. Finance Committee (Wallace / Schafer)
c. Executive Committee (Schafer I Wallace)
d. Planning Committee (Mosbacher / Schafer)
BOARD MEMBER AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS
(Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
a. Union Negotiations Ad Hoc Committee (Wallace / Comte)
b. Lukins Water Company Purchase Ad Hoc Committee (Wallace / Comte)
c. Building Ad Hoc Committee (Mosbacher / Jones)
d. Indian Creek Reservoir Water Storage Ad Hoc Committee (Mosbacher / Jones)
9. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
10.
EL ~RADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY REPRES NTATIVE REPORT
(Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
1t¸.
12.
GENERAL ~AGER REPORTS (Discussion may be held on these items; however, no action will
be taken)
a. Meetings re: Fire Protection Requirements
b. Update on Waterline Projects TRPA Permits
STAFF REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken)
13. NOTICE OF PAST AND FUT,URE MEETINGS ! EVENTS
Past Meetings I Events
04/25106 - ECC (Employee Communications Committee) Meeting
04125106 - Health Care Options Subcommittee Meeting
04126/06 - 04/28106 - CASA Spring Conference
05101/06 - Building Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
05101/06 - Operations Committee Meeting
'REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - MAY 4, 2006 ' ' ' PAGE - 3
Future Meetings ,/Events
05/04/06 - 6:00 p.m. - STPUD Public Meeting re: 2006/07 Budget and Ten-Year
Financial Plan at Barton Memorial Hospital's Board Room
(Located at 2170 South Ave., South Lake Tahoe, CA)
05/05106 - 10:00 a.m.- Lake Tahoe Executives Quarterly Meeting at TRPA Office
05/08/06- 05/12/06- ACWA Spdng Conference in Monterey
05/16/06 - 9:00 a.m.- Alpine County Supervisors Regular Board Meeting in Markleeville
05/16/06 - 4:00 p.m.- Operations Committee Meeting at Distdct Office
05/18/06 - 2:00 p.m. - STPUD Regular Board Meeting at District Office
14. CLOSED SESSION
Pg. 85
Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 54956.8/Real Estate Negotiations
Negotiating Parties: Board Ad Hoc Committee, General Manager, Assistant General
Manager/Engineer, Chief Financial Officer
Under Negotiation: Terms and Price
Property Identification: Lukins Water Company, 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe,
CA 96150
bo
Pg. 87
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Existing Litigation re: Beth Jett, Kendall Pearce, and Pearce Family Trust dated
1-20-88 vs. South Lake Tahoe Public Utility District, Cox & Cox Construction, Inc., a
California Corporation, Nimbus Engineers, a Nevada Corporation and Does 1-100,
inclusive, Civil Action No. PC 20050567, Superior Court, County of El Dorado,
State of California.
Pg. 89
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Existing Litigation: STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land in Alpine County, California;
et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento
Division, Case No. CIV S-02-0238 MCE JFM
Pg. 91
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Existing Litigation re: Meyers Landfill Site: United States of America vs. El Dorado
County and City of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No.
S-01-1520 LKK GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern Distdct of Ca.
e. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)/Conference with Legal Counsel-
Pg. 93 Anticipated Litigation (Two Cases)
15. ACTION ! ,REPORT ON, ITEMS D!SCUSS~D,,DURING CLOSED SESSION
16. ADJOUR, ..... NMENT~ ....... (To the next regular meeting, May 18, 2006, 2:00 p.m.)
Note: At 6:00 p.m., after the May 4 Regular Board Meeting, the Board of Directors will hold a Public
Meeting to gather public input on the 2006/07 Proposed Budget and Ten-Year Financial Plan. The Public
~ng will be held at the Barton Memorial Hospital's Board Room, located at 2170 South Avenue, South
Lake Tahoe, CA. No Board action will be taken at this meeting. The final budget is expected to be adopted
at the May 18, 2006, Regular Board Meeting.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - MAY 4, 2006 ...... PAGE - 4
The South Tahoe Public Utility District BOard of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month.
A complete agenda packet, including all backup information is available for review at the meeting and at the District
office during the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Items on this agenda are numbered for
identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the order in which they appear on the agenda.
Designated times are for particular items only. Public Hearings will not be called to order prior to the time specified.
Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the agenda will be taken at the same time
the agenda items are heard; comments should be bdef and directed to the specifics of the item being considered.
Comments on items not on the agenda can be heard during ~Comments from the Audience;" however, action cannot
be taken on items not on the agenda. Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all wdtten matedal
presented at the meeting.
The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate
participation of the disabled in all of the District's public meetings. If particular accommodations for the disabled are
needed (i.e., disability-related aids, or other services), please contact the Clerk of the Board at 530.544.6474,
extension 6203, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR
MAY 4, 2006
ITEMS REQUESTED ACTION
a. Office Furniture
Pg. 1 (Linda Brown)
Authorize Purchase of Hon Office
Furniture and Services from Kahl
Commercial Interiors, Inc., from the
State of Nevada's Competitively
Negotiated Contract, in the
Estimated Amount of $40,000
b. Bayview Waterline
Pg. 7 (John Thiel)
Approve Task Order No. 3 to
Auerbach Engineering in an Amount
Not to Exceed $20,000
Pg. 17
Collection System Master Plan (CSMP)
(Paul Sciuto)
Authorize Staff to Request Proposals
from Consulting Engineering Firms
to Conduct a CSMP
Pg. 19
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)
(Paul Sciuto)
Approve Proposal from Kennedy/
Jenks Consultants to Prepare the
District's 2005 UWMP, in an Amount
Not to Exceed to $27,000
South Tahoe Public Utility Distdct · 1275 Meadow Crest Ddve · South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Phone 530.544.6474 · Facsimile 530.541.0614 · www.stpud.us
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H, Solbrig
James P~ Jones
Mary Lou Mosbach~r
Duan¢ Wallace
Edt 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Linda Brown, Purchasing Agent
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Office Furniture
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize purchase of Hon office furniture and
services from Kahl Commercial Interiors, Inc., from the State of Nevada's competitively
negotiated contract, in the estimated amount of $40,000.
DISCUSSION: A committee of four employees researched numerous public agency
contracts for office furniture required for our new buildings. Those contracts included
four contracts with the U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance and multiple
contracts with both the State of California and the State of Nevada. Staff considered
styles of furniture, prices, responsiveness, reputation of vendors, and decided on the
Hon furniture line through Kahl Commercial Interiors Inc., located in Reno. The contract
offers a 48% discount off list prices. Cost projections include sales tax and estimated
set-up charges. Staff expects to negotiate an additional discount based on the volume
of the purchase.
SCHEDULE: Order as soon as possible, take delivery of furniture at move-in time
COSTS: Estimated $40,000
ACCOUNT NO: 1000/2000-4820
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $125,000
ATTACHMENTS: State of Nevada letter & contract page, Furniture Order/Budget List
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES ,~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES ~(~1'~~- NO
CATEGORY: General
-1-
KENNY C. GUINN
Governor
July 6, 2005
STATE OF NEVADA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
PURCHASING DIVISION
515 East Musser Street, Suite 300
Carson City, Nevada 89701
Phone (775) 684-0170 · Fax (775) 684-0188
JOHN R COMEAUX
Director
GREG SMITH
Purchasing Administrator
Dan Kahl
Kahl Commerci'al Interiors, Inc.
201 W Liberty Street
Reno, NV 89501
Fax: (775) 284-3601~,
The State of Nevada, Purchasing Division has completed the evaluation process of RFP
No. 1465: Systems Furniture, Furniture Case Goods, Seating & Refurbished Furniture.
This letter is to inform you of the intent to award multiple contracts to Haworth, Inc.,
Kahl Commercial Interiors, Inc 'and Machabee Office Environments pending successful
negotiation of contract terms and specifications.
I will be contacting you within the next few days to further discuss the details of your
contract. As soon as any changes are agreed upon, contract documents will be forwarded
for your consideration. Once signatures have been obtained from all parties, I will issue a
Notification of Award.
Note: Any contract resulting from this RFP shall not be effective unless and until
approved by the Nevada State Board of Examiners (NRS 284.173).
Submitted proposals are confidential until the contract is awarded; following contract
award, in accordance with NRS 333.333, the State will maintain confidentiality of
appropriately labeled proprietary information regarding a trade secret as defined in NRS
600A.030.
Please do not hesitate to call me at (775) 684-0172 if you have any questions. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Gaff Burchett, Purchasing Officer
Services Procurement Section
Approved 10/16/02
Please visit our website 'at http://purchasing, stamnv, us
For Purchasing Use Only:
RFP/CONTRACT # 1465
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
A Contract Between the State of Nevada
Acting By and Through Its
Various State Agencies
Monitored By:. Department of Administration
Purchasing Division
515 E Musser Street, Room 300
Carson CityNV 89701
Contact: Gail Burchett, Purchasing Officer
Phone: (775) 684-0172 Fax: (775) 684-0188
And
~-~'~ Kahl Commercial Interiors, Inc.
Contact Person: Dan Kahl, CEO
201 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada 89501
Tel. (775) 284-3600 Fax (775) 284-3602
Tax ID #88-0498941
WHEREAS, NRS 284.173 authorizes elective officers, heads of departments, boards, commissions or institutions to engage,
subject to the approval of the Board of Examiners, services of persons as independent contractors; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed that the service of Contractor is both necessary and in the best interests of the State of Nevada;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the aforesaid premises, the parties mutually agree as follows:
1. REQUIRED APPROVAL. This Contract shall not become effective until and unless approved by the Nevada State Board of
Examiners.
2. DEFINITIONS. "State" means the State of Nevada and any state agency identified herein, its officers, employees and
immune contractors as defined in NRS §41.0307. "Independent Contractor" means a person or entity that performs services
and/or provides goods for the State under the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract. "Fiscal Year" is defined as the
period beginning July 1 and ending June 30 of the following year.
3. CONTRACT TERM. This Contract shall be effective subject to Board of Examiners' approval (anticipated to be August
9, 2005) to August 31, 2007, unless sooner terminated by either party as specified in paragraph (9).
4. NOTICE. Unless otherwise specified, termination shall not be effective until 30 calendar days after a party has served written
notice of default, or without cause upon the other party. All notices or other communications required or permitted to be given
under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally in hand, by telephonic
facsimile with simultaneous regular mail, or mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid on the date posted,
and addressed to the other party at the address SPecified above.
5. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS. The parties agree that the scope of work shall be specifically descnl0ed; this Contract
incorporates the following attachments in descending order of constructive precedence; a Contractor's Attachment shall not
contradict or supersede any State specifications, terms or conditions without written evidence of mutual assent to such change
appearing in this Contract:
ATTACHMENT AA:
ATrA~ BB:
STATE SOLICITATION (RFP #1465} and Amendments
SCOPE OF WORK
CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSE
6. CONSIDERATION. The parties agree that Contractor will provide goods and services as SPecified in the cost proposal for
various state agencies on an as needed basis as stated within attachment BB, Contractors reSPonse. BeCause of the unique nature
of these services, most will require the state agency to contact the contracted vendor for a quote; total contract payable not to
exceed $2.000.000.00 for the term of the contract. The State does not agree to reimburse Contractor for expenses unless
otherwise specified in the incorporated attachments. The contractual authority_, as identified by the not to exceed amount,
.4pproved 05/08/02
Revised 08/03 Page 1 of 8
inc install.
Room # Employ~ Title Fum List Price Tot Cost Budget Tbl
223 Acct Payroll Valido 11586L 72" desk -HH bourbon cherry 859
w/brushed brass cresent pulls
11534 stack on 72" - HH 719
105856 back enclosure for 11534 142
11511R right return 42" w/lock 609
90056 tackboard - W-05 165 1566.64 1,500
221 Acct Tech Valido 11585R desk -HH bourbon chemj 859
115327 stack on shelv - HH 799
11512L return 42" - HH 609
E4022 keyboard platform 30"- HH 199
90053 tackboard -SG, 54 139
105853 enc for tackboard 126 1699.36 i,500
232 ^dmin Asst 10647R cred w/36" lateral -MM reed oak 914
10660 bridge 42" - MM 215
10680 comer unit 24x42 - MM 644
10616L return 2/0 - MM 524
HKB200 keyboard w/mouse tray 211 1574.4~ 2,000
200'AGM 115899 dblped desk,bow top .NN Mahogany 1379 Y
w/satin nickle cresent pulls
E4022 keyboard Platform 30" - NN 199
11541 credenza shell -NN 499
115492 credenza w/lat storage -NN 1269
115324 stack on storage for cred 60" -NN 669
2- 11555 bookcases - NN ~$559ea 1118
115520 end cap/bookshelf/organ -NN 379
LB3672F boat shape laminate top -NN 336
BLS01 laminate slab base -NN 313
11530 pets storage cabinet - NN 1459 4437.2 4,500
~ 163 Chief Plant Op 1 1585R 3/4 single ped desk - HH bout che~ 859
90150 keyboard Platform for desk_ HH 199
11516L 3/4 left return - HH 619
1522 angled center drawer for return - HH 120
w/bushed brass crescent pulls for all
2-F23B removable lock core kits (~$17, blac 34
11563 2-drawer lateral file - HH 699 1586.8 1,500
140 Comp Tech 38294L desk left ped 2/0 - P & H 921
4028 keybd platform mounted to desk 98
I 38215R right return 012 -P & H 555 1051.44 1,500
2021Const Mgr 115890 dbl ped desk 3/2 - MM Med Oak 1299 y
115906L left return 2/0 - MM 749
E4022 Keyboard platform (laminate)- MM 199
2-11554 Bookcase 36w- MM (~$479 ea 958
LD 48" conference table - MM 293
BLX02 X base for table - MM 239 2262.72 3,300
229 DIO 115899 dbl ped desk 3/2 -JP HennaCh,BIk 1379 Y
E40~ keybd platform (laminate) - PP black 199
115491 credenza w/2 36" lat files - JP 1399
11554 bookcase - JJ Henna Cherry 479
DT2436C Conf end table w/casters - JJ 464
11534 stackon storage for 72"cred - JJ 719 2767.84 3,300
226 Fin Admin 10688L left ped desk - JJ Henna Cherry 849 Y
1522 angled center drawer for desk - JJ 120
10611R right retum- JJ 599
E4022 30x10 keyboard platform for retum-J~ 199
-5-
10650 credenza w/doors 2/0/2 - JJ 1099
115523 end cap bookshelf- JJ 319
LVPM1 vertical paper manager- JJ 242. 2089.12 2,300
214 Hydrol 115896L single ped desk, left 3/0 72" - JP 1019
4022 desk keybd platfrm veneer -PP blk 147
115905R right return 0/2, 48" - JP Ch,BIk 749 1242.4' 2,500
151 Lab Dir 38950L 42" left return - P Black 396
38241N stackon storage 48" - P 361
38929 comer unit - P 678
2- 18720K mobile pedestels- P (~$422 844
38943R right return - P 425
38961 48" modesty panel - P 82
38246 Flipper doors 144
38FRBRK stackon mounting bracket 47
1522 Center drawer 22" - JJ Henna Cherry 120
4029 metal keyboard 24" - P black 88 1953.6 2,5001
153 Lab Office (4) - SlB $ 5-38929 comer unit - P black (~$678 3390
5-4029 metal keyboard (comer units) (~ $88 440~
5-38950L left retums- P ~$396 1980
5-38949R right returns P ~$396 1980
5-1522 drawers - J Henna Cherry (~120 600
10-18720 pedestel (box,box,file) -P (~ $422 4220 7911.6 7,500
109 Network 38292L left ped desk 2/0 - P & H 848
38853 credenza w/doors 2/0/2 - P&H 974
38244N stackon storage - P&H 451
T72 tackboard - P & GN13 223
4028 metal keyboard platform 98 1622.64 1,650
108 PC Support 38294L left ped desk 2/0 - HP B.Ch, BIk St 921
38217R right return 0/2 - HP 555
4028 metal keyboard platform - desk rant 98 1051.44 1,350
216 Purch Agent 92788L 72" left ped desk - MM Med Oak 1900 Y
E4022 keybd drwr (laminate) - MM 199
92711R return (file/file) - MM 1294
92735 stack on storage w/back- MM 1637
90034 tackboard 165
92755 5 shelf bookcase - MM 1266
92762 2 drawer lateral 1130 4420.96 4,200
218 Purch Assistant 92741 Credenza w/space 2/0/2 -MM Med O9 1844
E4022 keybd drwr (laminate) - MM 199 1144.08 1,100
Total 62573 38382.32 42,200
-6-
South Tahoe
Public Ut!lity District
General Manager
Richard H. 5olbHg
Torn
Jam~ P~ Jone~
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Puane Wallace
E~e
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4b
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
John Thiel, Principal Engineer
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Bayview Waterline
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Task Order No. 3 to Auerbach Engineering
in an amount not to exceed $20,000.
DISCUSSION: The Bayview Waterline Project includes the installation of approximately
4,000 feet of 18-inch diameter pipe to link the new Bayview Well with existing
watermains on Sacramento Street, Nevada Street, and Highway 50. T&S Construction
has been contracted to construct this project.
Auerbach Engineering prepared the construction drawings and specifications under
Task Order No. 1. This Task Order No. 3 includes construction related activities
including review of contractor submittals, site visits, and responses to project changes
or contractor questions. While the entire amount may not be used, funds should be
available in case additional engineering help is needed. The Engineering Department
will be short an engineer for at least the next two or three months.
Staff recommends approval of this Task Order No. 3i
SCHEDULE: Begin construction May 22, 2006. Complete by October 15, 2006.
COSTS: Not to exceed $20,000
ACCOUNT NO: 2029-8574/BAYWEL
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: <$942,777>
ATTACHMENTS: Task Order No, 3, Budget Analysis
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES ,~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES ~'~YY¥:--. NO
CATEGORY: Water
-?-
TASK ORDER NO. 002
South Tahoe Public Utility District
(CLIENT)
AND
Auerbach Engineering Corporation
(CONSULTANT)
This Task Order is issued by the CLIENT and accepted by CONSULTANT pursuant to the
provisions of agreement contained in the Agreement between the above named parties dated
the 21st day of March, 2005, in connection with:
PURPOSE
Bayview Waterline Project
(Project)
The purpose of this Task Order No. 002 is to provide professional services during the
construction of the proposed Bayview Waterline project consisting of a 18-inch water
transmission pipeline from the well pump station located on Lot 701 along San Francisco
Avenue to a connection point at the intersection of Modesto Avenue and Highway 50. This Task
Order No..002 ehcompasses the office construction services for the Project.
Based on the above information, the following scope of services was developed by the STPUD
and Auerbach Engineering Corporation (AEC) project team.
CONSULTANT'S SERVICES
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
· This task assumes that the CLIENT will be providing field inspections services.
· Construction staking will be completed'by the Contractor.
· "Record Drawings" will be completed by the CLIENT.
J:~0071.00~docs~Contracts\Task_Order_002\Task_Order 002 DRAFT.doc FINAL
EXHIBIT i
Page I of 3
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 9.0 Services Durinq Construction {TH-2 Facilities)
coNSULTANT will provide the following assistance to the CLIENT during the construction
period for the Project.
9.1 Attend Pre-construction Conference. CONSULTANT will attend one pre-construction
conference, answer questions as directed by the CLIENT. CONSULTANT will prepare minutes
for this meeting.
9.2 Review Contrac~'urs Submittals. CONSULTANT will review and comment on'acceptability of
Contractor submittals for the CLIENT. All comments shall be logged and returned to the
submitter through the CLIENT to maintain continuity and lines of communication.
9.3 Prepare Design Clarifications and RFI's. As part of the submittal review process,
CONSULTANT will respond to contractor RFI's or requests for clarifications as requested by the
CLIENT.
9.4 Attend Progress Meetings and Make Site Visits. CONSULTANT will attend progress
meetings and conduct periodic site visits to monitor construction and to be available to expedite
resolutions to construction issues. It is assumed that four (4) progress meetings and four (4) site
visits will be required.
9.5 Review Proposed Change Orders. CONSULTANT will assist the CLIENT with the evaluation
of change order requests.
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The 'estimated time of completion for this Task Order is one hundred twenty (120) days.
PAYMENT
Per Exhibit "A".
J:\0071.00~ocs\ContraCtsITask..Order_002\Task_Order 002 DRAFT.doc FINAL
EXHIBIT 1
Page 2 of 3
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Task Order NO. 002 is effective as of the ~ day of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representative.s of the CLIENT and of the
CONSULTANT have executed this Task Order No. 002 evidencing its issuance by CLIENT and
acceptance by CONSULTANT. .
Auerbach Engineering Corporation,
South Tahoe Public Utility District
Accepted this __ day of
20
By: By:
CONSULTANT ·
CLIENT
J:~0071.00~docs~Conlracts~Task_Order_002~Task_Order 002 DRAFT.doc FINAL
EXHIBIT 1
-11-
Page 3 of 3
Task Description
Exhibit "A#
Labor Hour Estimate
Total
Prin. PM PE/PLS Tech Planner Crew Draft WP Hours
TASK 9.0 Services During Constzuctlon
9.1 Attend Pre-construct;ion Conference
9.2 Revery Contractors Submittals
9.3 Prepare Design Clsrificalions and RFrs
9.4 Attend Progress Meetings and Make Site Visits
- 9.5 Review Proposed Change Orders
Tolal Hours
0 4 4 0 0 0 0 4 12
2 8 40 0 0 0 0 0 50
2 ~ 16 0 0 0 8 4 34
2 32 32 0 0 0 0 4 70
2 4 16 0 0 0 4 4 30
Task Sublotat 8 52 108 0 0 0 12 16 196
;, 52 108 0 0 0 12 16 196
4.1% 26.5% 55.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 8,2% 100.0%
J:~OO71.00'~locs~Contracts~Tl~k.O~_ 002~TI~<_O~'~'_No..2
A-1
EXHIBIT 1
Hours
-:1.2-
Task Description
Exhibit "A"
Labor COSt Estimate
Prin. PM PE/PLS Tech Planner Crew
TASK 9.0 Services During Construction 9.1 Attend P~-construc~io~ Co~fe~ence
9.2 Review Conb'actors Submittals
9.3 Prepare Design Clarifications and RFI's
9,4 Attend Progress MeeUngs and Make Site Visits
9.5 Review proposed Change Orders
Total Hours
$ $ 520 $ 380
$. 300 $ 1,040 $ 3.800
$ 300 $ 520 $ 1.520
S 300 $ 4,160 $ 3,040
$ 300 $ 520 $ 1.520
Task Subtotal $ 1,200 $ 6,760 $ 10,260$ $
$ 1.200 S 6.760 $ 10.260$ S $
6.0% 34.0% 51.7% 0.0%
$ 184 $ 1,084
$ $ 5.140
600 $ 184 $ 3,124
$ 184 $ 7,684
300 $ 1~4 $ 2.824
$ 900 $ 736 $ 19.856
$ 900 S 736 $ 19.856
4,5% 3.7% 100.0%
~2
EXHIBIT I
-13-
Exhibit "A"
Summary of Costs for Professional Services
Labor Description
Rate
Total Total
Hours Cost
Principal
Project Manager
Project Engineer/Surveyor
Eng/Survey Technician
Planner
Field Crew
CAD Drafter
Word Processor
Sub-Total
8 $1,200
52 $6,760
108 $10,260
0 $0
0 $0
0 $0
12 $9OO
16 $736
196 $ 19,856
Other Direct Costs (ODC's)
b.) Travel (8trips @ $50/trip)
c.) Printing (Estimated)
$ 400
$ 500
Subtotal $ 900
Total $ 20,756
J:\0071.00\docs~Contracts\Task_Order_002~Task_Order No 2 A-3
EXHIBIT I
Summary Costs
BAYVIEW WELL
Account: 2029-8574
BUDGET REMAINING ANALysIs:
2005/06 All Years
Spent to date 159,814 857,104
Outstanding Purchase Orders-
KG Walters Construction 1,782,963 1,782,963
0 0
Total Encumbered 1,782,963 1,782,963
Total Spent & Encumbered 1,942,777 2,640,067
Budget 2006 - 1,000,000 1,495,000
-942,777 -1,145,067
-250,000 1,289,790
Under (Over) Budget/Estimate
Financial Plan 2007
Under (Over) Financial Plan
-1,192,777 144,723
Note: The KG Walters purchase order is a multi-year contract, whereas the ·
budget is for one year. As such, this is causing the over budget amount. For
that reason I am also showing the amount earmarked in the Long-term Financial
Plan for 2007.
-15-
South .Tahoe
Public Utility District
I~icha nd H. -~olbrig
Oir~or s
Tom Comt~
Jamae ~.
Ma~ ~u Mosbacher
Ouane Wallace
~c 5ch~r
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474, Fax 530 541-0614, www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4c
TO:
FROM:
Board of Directors
Paul A. Sciuto, Assistant General ManagedEngineer
MEETING DATE:
May 4,2006
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Collection System Master Plan (CSMP)
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize staff to request proposals from consulting
engineering firms to conduct a CSMP.
DISCUSSION: Collection System Master Plans are a guiding document for the
management, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewer collection systems. The
District last completed a CSMP in 1986, and implemented many of the recommenda-
tions presented in the plan. However, the District's sanitary sewers, pump stations, and
forcemains are 20 years older and the community has changed substantially.
In addition, the State Water Quality Control Board is possibly initiating Waste Discharge
Requirements (WDR) on May 3, 2006, that will require a formal plan and submittal for
sanitary sewer collection systems. One of the elements of the WDR is a CSMP.
Staff intends to solicit proposals from engineering consultants to prepare a CSMP,
which will include flow monitoring, condition assessment, hydraulic modeling, CIP
recommendations, and a final report.
SCHEDULE: Select consultant by June 2006, start the project in July 2006, complete
by the end of 2007.
COSTS: Estimate- $446,700
ACCOUNT NO: 1029-8721
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:. $160,500 (2006 budget) $286,200 (2007
proposed budget
ATTACHMENTS: None
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GE.ERAL M AGER: , d+2.o
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES RKY'~,. NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
-17-
South Tahoe
public Utility District
General Manager
I~ichard H. ~3olbrig
D/rec~'or5
Tom Comte
Jame~ I~ Jonee
Ma r-,j Lou Moebacher
Puan¢ Wallace
EHe $cha~er
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe* CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDAITEM4d
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Paul A. Sciuto, Assistant General Manager/Engineer
MEETING DATE:
May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve proposal from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
to prepare the District's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, in an amount not to
exceed $27,200.
DISCUSSION: The District prepared and submitted a UWMP in 2002 to the
Department of Water Resources (DWR). In late 2005 we submitted the same report with
a cover letter stating that no substantial changes occurred to the plan. The DWR did not
accept the 2002 report because the regulations and reporting requirements have
changed, and have required the District to complete a new UWMP.
In addition, the Proposition 50 grant that the District is currently submitting, is contingent
upon having an accepted UWMP.
SCHEDULE: Select consultant by May 4, 2006, start the project immediately, and
complete by July 2006.
COSTS: Not to exceed $27,200
ACCOUNT NO: Unbudgeted
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: Proposals from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants and Brown and Caldwell
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GE.ERAL,, AGER: .O
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES ~)"Y~" NO
CATEGORY: Water
-:1.9-
26 APril 20O6
Mr. Paul Sciuto, P.E.
Assistant General Manager / Engineer
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Subject:
Proposal for Professional Services to prepare an update to the
Urban Water Management Plan for South Tahoe Public Utility
District
K/J R06006
Dear Mr. Sciuto:
Attached is the scope of work to prepare a 2005 update of the South Tahoe Public
Utili[y District Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) as required by the California
Water Code for all water purveyors serving more than 3000 customers. The UWMP is
required to be adopted by the District Board and submitted to the State of California
Department of Water Resources prior to December 31, 2005 or as soon as possible
after the deadline.
Compensation will be on a time and materials basis, with a budget of $27,200, not to be
exceeded without approval by the District.
We will begin work upon receipt of the District-provided data listed in the scope, and will
submit a draft plan within 10 weeks.
Please contact me at 775-827-7900 or Brad Milner at 805-658-0607 if you have any
questions. We look forward to assisting the District in this project.
c:~documents arid seffJngs~chds whale n~ocal se~nga~temporar~, internet ~iles",olk 118¥o~osal te~er.d0c
-21-
Very truly yours,
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
Lynn H. Orphan, P.E.
Senior Engineer
LHO/pkh
Enclosures
cc: File - Reno
Brad Milner- Ventura
c:~docurnents and se~ngs'~chris wha e ntJo-c, al setti~gs',tempor ary internet liles~,olk 118',~roF3$al letter.doc
-2.2-
ATTACHMENT A
Introduction
California Water Code (Water Code) requires the preparation of an Urban Water
Management Plan and periodic updates. The Water Code (Section 10610 to 10656)
requires water suppliers to prepare an UWMP to promote water conservation and
efficient water use. The Water Code also specifies the contents and procedures for
adoption of the Plan. The Plan must be adopted and submitted to the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR) before December 31 for years ending in 5 or 0.
Consequently, the District's Update must be adopted and submitted to DWR prior to 31
December 2005, or as soon as possible after the deadline. Objectives of this UWMP
include the following:
· Accomplishes water supply planning over a 20-year period in 5-year increments
· Identifies and quantifies adequate water supplies, including recycled water, for
existing and future demands, in normal, dry, and multiple dry years
· Identifies actions to prepare for and implement during a catastrophic interruption
of water supplies
· Implements conservation and efficient use of urban water supplies.
Recent Changes to Urban Water Management Planning Act
In 2000, legislation (AB 2552) was approved that requires urban water suppliers to
submit their UWMPs to cities and counties where the water supplier provides water.
The intent of this new requirement is to help ensure that city and county planning
agencies have reliable water supply information on which to make growth decisions.
Additional changes approved in 2001 include AB 901, SB 221, SB 610, and SB 672.
AB 901 requires UWMP to include information, relating to the water quality of source
supplies and the manner in which the water quality affects water management
strategies and supply reliability. This bill requires the plan to describe plans to
supplement a water source that may not be available at a consistent level of use. SB
221 prohibits a city or county from approving a residential subdivision of more than 500
units unless the city council or the board of supervisors provides written verification from
the area's water service provider that a sufficient water supply is available for the
development. SB 610.requires additional information to be included as part of the
UWMP for urban water supplies whose water supply includes groundwater. It requires
a city or county that determines that a development project is subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act to identify any public water system that may supply water for
the project and to request that system to prepare a specific water supply assessment. It
requires urban water suppliers to include in the UWMP a description of all water supply
projects and programs that may be undertaken to meet total projected water use. This
bill requires the DWR to take into consideration whether an urban water supplier has
-23-
submitted an updated UWMP in determining eligibility for funds made available
pursuant to any program administered by DWR. SB 672 requires urban water suppliers
to describe in the UWMP water management tools and other options used by that
agency to maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other
regions. It is recommended that the District consider extending the assessment window
of the UWMP to 2030 (25 years) in order to comply with AB 610 and SB 220
requirements.
The DWR developed two sets of worksheets to aid water suppliers preparing UWMPs.
These worksheets include the "2005 UWMP Review for Completeness Form" which
covers the general provisions of the Urban Water Management Planning Act, and
includes 57 tables. In addition, the DWR released the "2005 UWMP Review of DMMs
for Completeness Form," a series of 14 tables which focuses solely on the 14 demand
management measures from Section 10631 (f) of the Urban Water Management
Planning Act. The worksheets are useful organization tools to ensure that Various
provisions of the law have been addressed in the plan. The Urban Water Management
Planning Act does not require a Water supplier to use either of the worksheets. The use
of these tools is option. However, all of the information from the DWR tables must be
presented in the UWMP, either via text or use of the 71 tables or a combination of text
and tables.
Scope of Services
The Work Plan defined below is based on our understanding of the project
requirements, our familiarity with the District's facilities, our experience with the
applicable regulations and guidance documents, and our experience on similar projects.
Task 1 - Collect and Review Background Information
Kennedy/Jenks will review background information collected for the District's service
area, water supply and demand, and water policies. The objective of this task is to
gather available data necessary to prepare the UWMP update. It is recommended that
the District consider extending the assessment window of the UWMP to 2030 (25 years)
in order to comply with AB 610 and SB 220 requirements. Information to be collected
and reviewed includes the following:
· 2002 Urban Water Management Plan
· Local General Plans
· District Master Plans
· District Water ConservatiOn Plan
· Groundwater Management Plans
· Recycled Water Master Plans
· Water Supply Assessments
2
-2~,-
· Reports to the California Urban Water Conservation Council
· Current and proposed land uses (to the year 2025/2030)
· Population estimates and projections (to the year 2025/2030)
· Historical, current, and projected (to the year 2025/2030) water consumption by
user class, including recycled water consumption, if applicable
· Water resources, including reliability (to the year 2025/2030)
· Water quality issues, including known contaminants (to the year 2025;2030)
· Current water rate structure
· Accomplishments of the water demand management programs of the last five
years
· Water C°nservation-related ordinances currently or previously adopted by the
District
· Planned modifications to the District water system and available supply (such as
addition of new wells and/or water treatment facilities).
When available, Kennedy/Jenks would prefer to receive the information in electronic
(MS Word, MS Excel, etc.) format.
Task 2 - Update Service Area Description
Kennedy/Jenks will update the existing description of the District's service area to
satisfy the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act and subsequent
amendments. Land use and population estimates will be updated based on District-
provided information. Population and water demand projections will be presented in
5-year increments for a 20-year period, through the year 2025. It is recommended that
the District consider extending the assessment window of the UWMP to 2030 (25 years)
in order to comply with AB 610 and SB 220 requirements.
Task 3 - Update Water Resources and Quality
Kennedy/Jenks will update the quantity and quality of the water sources existing within
the Study Area based on District-provided information. These sources will include local
water supplies, imported water supplies, potential for exchanges or transfers, and other
potential water supplies. Kennedy/Jenks will update the description of water quality,
including any known contamination that may impact water resources. It is
recommended that the District consider extending the assessment window of the
UWMP to 2030 (25 years) in order to comply with AB 610 and SB 220 requirements.
For each source, Kennedy/Jenks will define the following:
· Production volumes and water quality for the past five years
3
-25-
· Current production trends and water quality
· Projected production and water quality for 2005-2030 in five-year increments
· Availability and water quality for normal, single-dry year, and four-year dry
periods for 2005-2030 in five-year increments
· Management practices implemented to preserve the sources.
Task 4 - Determine Water Demand Projections
Kennedy/Jenks will use the Districts most recent water use data and projections to
define current water demands and historical trends for the last five-years.
Kennedy/Jenks will also determine the water demand projections in five-year
increments from 2005 to 2030 for a normal water year, single-dry water year, and four-
year dry water years based on District-provided information. Water demand projections
based on per-capita water use, service connections, and land-use changes will be
determined and evaluated. Projections will be presented by water use sector. It is
recommended that the District consider extending the assessment window of the
UWMP to 2030 (25 years)in order to comply with AB 610 and SB 220 requirements.
Task 5 - Evaluate Water Supply Reliability
Based on District-provided information, Kennedy/Jenks Will evaluate the overall
reliability of the water sources existing within the Study Area. Kennedy/Jenks will
evaluate the adequacy of the existing supply to meet the projected water demands as
well as assess the frequency and magnitude of supply deficiencies. The reliability
analysis will include the average water year, single-dry water year, and four-year dry
water years. It is recommended that the District consider extending the assessment
window of the UWMP to 2030 (25 years) in order to comply with AB 610 and SB 220
requirements.
Task 6 - EValuate Water Recycling
Kennedy/Jenks will describe the availability of recycled water and its potential for use as
a water source within the Service Area based on the draft Recycled Water Master Plan
(Kennedy/Jenks). Kennedy/Jenks will define the following:
· Current recycled water production trends
· Projected recycled water production for 2005-2030 in five-year increments.
Task 7 - Update Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Kennedy/Jenks will review the District's existing water shortage contingency plan in
compliance with the provisions identified in the Water Code. Kennedy/Jenks will
provide the District with applicable revisions to the existing Water Shortage Contingency
Plan. The plan will include the following elements.
4
-:36-
· Description of plan coordination with local and regional suppliers.
· Highest historic total annual water demand and predicted highest water demand
at the end of 12, 24, and 36 months.
· Estimate of worst-case water supply at the end of 12, 24, and 36 months.
· Description of stages of rationing and associated triggers.
· Description of mandatory prohibitions and consumption limits.
· Description of adopted penalties and charges for excessive use.
· Revenue and expenditure analysis.
· Implementation resolution or ordinance.
· Description of monitoring mechanisms.
· Description of public noticing and plan adoption.
Revisions to the District's existing water shortage contingency plan must be easily
adopted and incorporated into District code.
Task 8 - Summarize Existing Water Demand Management Measures
and Accomplishments
Based on the District's previous UWMP and discussions with District personnel
Kennedy/Jenks will summarize the water demand management goals and current
program as well as the overall progress and effectiveness of the program. Programs
implemented to date will be summarized.
Task 9 - Evaluate Alternative Water Demand Management Measures
Kennedy/Jenks will evaluate alternative water demand management measures
including potential water savings based on District-provided information.
Kennedy/Jenks will recommend selected measures to be implemented, program
budget, and proposed implementation schedules. Kennedy/Jenks will summarize
applicable water demand measures, identified in the Water Code, which are not
currently being implemented or scheduled for implementation including potential water
savings.
Task 10 - Prepare Draft and Final UWMP
Kennedy/Jenks will document the findings in a Draft UWMP Update for the District.
Five (5) copies of the draft UWMP will be submitted to the District. Kennedy/Jenks will
incorporate written District comments and submit ten (10) copies of the Final UWMP
Update to the District. Kennedy/Jenks will provide the District with the Final UWMP on
5
-27-
compact disk (CD) also. Additional deliverables and copies may require a budget
augmentation.
Task 11 - Attend Public Hearing
Kennedy/Jenks will attend one required public hearing, if requested, and support the
District's staff providing conclusions and recommendations of the plan.
Task 12 - Respond to Public Comments
The District may receive comment~ from the public during the report preparation and
public hearing. Kennedy/Jenks will assist the District with responding to applicable
questions and preparation of responses to comments as directed by the District. These
responses will be submitted to the District for final review and distribution.
Task 13 - Project Management
Kennedy/Jenks' project manager will assure that proper resources and staff are
dedicated to this project to assure a timely completion of the UWMP. Kennedy/Jenks'
Project Manager will also implement and enforce internal Quality Assurance and Quality
Control programs.
Kennedy/Jenks anticipates a minimum of bi-weekly communication with the District's
Project Manager. Kennedy/Jenks will meet with District staff for two meetings, including
a project kickoff meeting and progress meeting.
Compensation
Based on our understanding of the project and our scope of services provided herein,
Kennedy/Jenks will prepare the UWMP on a time and materials basis with a not-to-
exceed budget of $27,200, using the January 1,2006 standard rate of charges. We will
not exceed this budget .without prior written authorization by the District.
Schedule
Kennedy/Jenks anticipates completion of the Draft UWMP within ten (10) weeks after
authorization and receipt of the initial District-provided data. It is anticipated that the
District would provide written comments on the Draft UWMP within four (4) weeks of
receipt of the Draft UWMP. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants anticipates completion of the
Final UWMP within four (4) weeks following receipt of written comments from the
District. Project completion will be delayed equivalent to any delaYs in receiving District
data and comments.
Because the updated UWMP is 'a requirement for PropOsition 50 grant funding,
Kennedy/Jenks Will prepare a letter to California Department of Water Resources
presenting a schedule for completion of the plan.
6
-28-
Client/Address: South Tahoe Public Utility District
Contract/Proposal Date: 11 April 2006
Schedule of Charges
January 1, 2006
Personnel Compensation
Classification Hourly Rate
CAD~T. echnician ................................................................................................. $84
Designer-Senior Technician ............................................................................... $103
Engineer-Scientist-S )ecialist 1 ........................................................................... $90
Engineer-Scientist-S
Engineer-Scientist-S
Engineer-Scientist-S
Engineer-Scientist-S
Engineer-Scientist-S
Engineer-Scientist-S
Engineer-Scientist-S
)ecialist
)ecialist
)ecialist
)ecialist
)ecialist
)ecialist
)ecialist
3 .......................................................................... $114
4 .......................................................................... $125
5 .......................................................................... $140
6 .......................................................................... $160
7 ............................. ; ............................................ $175
8 .......................................................................... $190
Engineer-Scientist-S )ecialist 9 .......................................................................... $200
Project Administrator .......................................................................................... $79
Administrative Assistant ..................................................................................... $65
Aide .................................................................................................................... $53
In addition to the above Hourly Rates, a three percent Communications Charge will be added to Personnel
Compensation for normal and incidental copies, communications and postage.
Direct Expenses
Reimbursement for direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work, will be at cost plus
ten pement for items such as:
a. Maps, photographs, reproductions, printing, equipment rental, and special supplies related to the work.
b. Consultants, soils engineers, surveyors, contractors, and other outside services.
c. Rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence.
d. Specific telecommunications and delivery charges.
e. Special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work.
f. Outside computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work.
Reimbursement for vehicles used in connection with the work will be at the rate of 44 cents per mile or at a
negotiated monthly rate.
Reimbursement for use of computerized drafting systems (CAD), geographical information systems (GIS), and other
specialized software and hardware will be at the rate of $12 per hour.
Rates for professional staff for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses will be at rates one and one-half times
the Houdy Rates specified above.
Other in-house charges for prints and reproductions, equipment usage, laboratory analyses, etc. will be at
standard company rates.
Excise and gross receipts taxes, if any, will be added as a direct expense.
The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the agreement for the services provided, effective January 1,2006
through December 31, 2006. After December 31, 2006, invoices will reflect the Schedule of Charges currently in effect.
29
10540 White Rock Road, Suite 180
Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Tel: (916) 444-0123
Fax: (916) 635-8805
wx*~v, broxvnandcaldxvcll.com
April 25, 2006
Mr. Paul Sciuto, P.E.
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, California 96150
1017-06-061051-003-001.7
Subject: Proposal for Preparation of 2005 Urban water Management Plan
Dear Mr. Sciuto:
Thank you for the opportunity to prepare South Tahoe Public Utility District's
(STPUD) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). This letter proposal
presents the scope ofwo'rk, project team, fee estimate, and schedule for
your review.
QUALIFICATIONS
Brown and Caldwell understands this LFWMP must be completed quickly and
according to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) guidelines in order to
support the ongoing Integrated Regional Water Planning effort and grant
applications. We are highly, familiar with the new DWR UXVMP guidelines. We
have just recently completed nearly 20 2005 UWMPs for entities in the state, and
over 60 LcWMPs since the requirement became law. The proposed project
manager, Jim Crowley, was the project manager for two of these recent plans and
completed both on schedule and under budget. Mr. Crowley also provided review
and other input for many of the other 2005 UWMPs. The proposed project team
all has participated in preparing multiple UXVMPs and will use this experience to
meet the unique schedule requirements for this project.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work consists of five tasks. These tasks are described as follows:
Task 1- Project Management
We will provide oversight of project staff and budget, and update STPUD staff
regarding project status.
P:\h~trkefng\Proposals_06\071003-004 grater Resources\003 Small Proposals SOQs\STPUD\061051-003-001 UWMP 2005~STPUD UWMP letter
proposal.doc
E n v i r o n m e n t a l E n g i n e e r s ~ C o n s u It a n t s
-31-
Mr. Paul Sciuto
April 25, 2006
Page 2
Task 2 - Data Collection and Review
Brown and Caldwell will provide a request for information on data, maps, reports,
and other records necessary to update the information in the 2000 plan with
current data. We will collect, utilize, and coordinate appropriate and available
information for use in development of the 2005 UWMP Update.
Task 3 - Prepare 2005 Urban Water Management Plan
Brown and Caldwell will prepare the 2005 UXVMP Update in accordance with the
Urban Water Management Planning Act of 1983, as amended, by updating
STPUD's 2000 plan according to the requirements of the Urban Water
Management Planning Act. We will coordinate development of the 2005 UWMP
Update with other water agencies and other organizations, as appropriate.
Below is a list of the items that will either be updated or added to the 2000 plan.
1. Present climate information by month including standard average
evapotranspirafion, average rainfall, and average temperature.
2. Update facilities information including capacities and water facilities map.
3. Present demographic and water demand projections based on information
developed in other studies or STPUD provided information.
4. Update number of connections by customer classification.
5. Update historical water production data through 2004.
6. Describe plan to eliminate groundwater overdraft, if any, and analysis of
location, amount, and sufficiency of groundwater pumped over hst five years
and projected to be pumped every five years for the next 20 years.
7. Provide discussion and table of water quality impacts upon water management
strategies and supply for the next 20 years at five year intervals.
8. Update recycled water discussion to include comparison of year 2000 UWMP
· projected recycled water use to actual use. Update recycled water discussion to
include information on plan coordination with other agencies. Provide a table
of methods used to encourage reCYcled water use.
9. Update water conservation section with description of current program.
Discuss plans for cost-benefit analysis of non-implemented DMMs/Best
management practices (BMPs).
P:\Maxketing\Proposals_06\071003-004 ~/ater Resources\003 Small Proposals SOQs\STPUD\061051-003-001 U~(/~'IP 2005\STPUD UWMP letter
proposal.doc
E n v i r o n m e n t a l E n g i n e e r s ~v' C o n s u I t a n t s
-39.-
Mr. Paul Sciuto
April 25, 2006
Page 3
10. Update projected water supply and demand comparison through 2030 and for
multiple dry years. Provide reliability of supply through year four of a multiple
dry year drought.
11. Provide tables of projected normal and multiple dry year scenario supply,
demand, and supply to demand comparison during the 2006-2010,
2011-2015, 2016-2020, and 2021-2025 periods.
12. Update discussion of water supply projects, inconsistent sources, and exchange
oppornmities. Provide additional information on future water supply projects,
if any, including project start date, project completion date, normal year water
supply to agency, single dry year water supply to agency, and years one, two,
and three of multiple dry years water supply to agency. Provide table
summarizing legal, environmental, water quality, and climatic factors resulting
in inconsistency of supplies. Describe additional water uses and losses from
2000 through 2025 for uses such as saline barriers, groundwater recharge, and
conjunctive use.
.13. Present descriptions of opportunities for development of desalinated water,
including ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater.
14. Summarize the water shortage contingency plan.
15. Provide Water Service Reliability section of UWMP to cities and counties
within which it provides water supplies within 60 days of LIWMP submission
to Department of Water Resources (DWR). Provide 2005 UWMP to DWR,
and cities and counties within 30 days of adoption. Describe coordination of
the plan preparation. Provide proof of public hearing.
Task 4 - Prepare Two Drafts and a Final Report
Brown and Caldwell will prepare a working draft for STPUD's internal review.
'We will incorporate STPUD's internal review comments and submit a final draft
to STPUD. Brown and Caldwell will then prepare a final report incorporating
comments, including one electronic copy. Brown and Caldwell will also address
comments (if provided) by DWR.
Task 5 - Meetings and Presentation
Brown and Caldwell will attend up to four project meetings to discuss data and
internal review comments.
We will assist, as requested by STPUD, in adoption of the 2005 UWMP Update,
including coordination of the Notice of Public Hearing, Resolution of Plan
Adoption, and circulation of copies of the Draft UWMP Update.
P:\Marke~ing\Proposals_06\071003-004 Wate~ Resources\003 Small Proposals SOQs\STPUD\061051-003-001 UWMP ~005\STPUD UWMP letter
proposal.doc
E n v i r o n m e n t a l E n g i n e e r s ~v' C o n s u I t a n t s
-33-
Mr. Paul Sciuto
April 25, 2OO6
Page 4
We will attend one STPUD Board presentation if necessary to present the final
UWMP report and address any comments or questions.
Task 6 - Additional Work Contingency
STPUD is not a member of the California Urban Water Conservation Council
(CUWCC), which creates additional efforts in the UWMP to meet the Best
Management Practices (BMPs) requirements. This task provides extra budget
should STPUD's conservation program information require additional analysis and
review than is currently estimated to meet the UWMP requirements. This task
also is intended to cover other additional work that may be necessary such as extra
public or Board meetings, coordination with the IRWMP project, and others. This
task will not be initiated without prior approval from STPUD.
PROJECT TEAM
Mr. Jim Crowley will take the lead as Project Manager for this project. He will be
assisted by Mr. Paul Selsky as Project Officer, Ms. Melanie Holton,
Ms. Carol Lazzaroto, Ms. Jenny Gain, and other staff as necessary. Resumes for
each individual are attached.
FEE ESTIMATE AND SCHEDULE
Brown and Cald~ell proposes to conduct the scope of work on a
time-and-material basis as presented in Table 1. We will not exceed the fee of
$34,000 without your prior authorization, including efforts covered under Task 6 -
Additional Work Contingency. Labor will be billed based on a 3.2 salary labor
multiplier. Internal charges for phone, fax, copies, and computers will be billed at
a charge of $8 per labor hour. Other direct charges (ODCs) will be billed at cost
plus 10 percent service charge. These costs are included in the fee est/mate.
Task 1. Project Management
Task 2. Data Collection and Review
Task 3. Prepare Working Draft
Task 4, Prepare Draft/Final Report
Task 5, Meetings
Total
Task 6. Additional Work Contingency
Total with Contingency
24
40
120
100
40
324
50
374
$2,000
$4,000
$14,000
$10,000
$4,000
$34,000
$5,000
$39,000
The Task 2 data request letter will be provided within one week of project
authorization. The working draft report will be submitted by May 26, 2006.
P:\Marketing\Proposals_06\0710034)04 Water Resources\003 Small Proposals SOQs\STPUD\061051-003-001 UWMP 2005\STPUD UX'f~:IP letter
proposal.doc
E n viro n m e n tal E ngin e e rs ~ Co n suit an ts
-34-
Mr. Pard Sciuto
April 25, 2006
Page 5
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
We propose to conduct the project under Brown and Caldwell's existing master
services agreement with STPUD. Once approved, we will convert this proposal
into a task order for contract authorization. We look forward to Working with you
on this interesting project.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Jim Crowley at
(916) 853-5322.
Sincerely,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC
UTILITIES DISTRICT
j. David Zuber, P.G.
Office Manager
Signature
Printed Name
Title
JC:mp Date
Enclosure
P:\Marketing\Proposals 06\071003-004 Water Resources\003 Small Proposals SOQs\STPUD\061051-003-O01 UWMP 2005\STPUD U~IP letter
proposal.doc
E n viro n m e n tal Engineers ~ Co n sultan ts
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER JAMES P. CROWLEY, P.E.
Experience Summar~
James Crowley has 16 years of experience working in all aspects of water, wastewater, and stormwater
projects. These projects include master plans, capacity evaluations, renovations, expansions, and operations
support to assist utilities in developing and implementing capital improvement projects. Most recently, Mr.
Crowley is involved in water resources planning efforts including integrated water regional plans, drought
plans, water and recycled water master plans, UWMPs, and USBR water management plans. The following is
an abbreviated list of projects completed throughout Jim's 16-year career.
Urban Water Management Plans
Project Manager. Prepared urban water management plan that describes
water system, develops demand projections, evaluates water conservation
measures, describes existing and planned sources of water available,
presents water supply reliability data for normal and dry years, and
quantifies current and projected amounts of wastewater collected and
treated in service area and potential use for recycled water. Plans were
prepared for the City of Roseville, the San Juan Water District, the
Sacramento Suburban Water District, the Placer County Water Agency,
and the City of Merced.
Groundwater Management Plan Grant Application, City of
Davis, California
Project Engineer. Developed project description, scope, and
implementation plan for California Groundwater Management Plan grant
application. Developed application according to guidelines, working with
DWR staff to ensure proper submittal requirements. Grant application
scored well and Davis will receive requested funding.
Water System Evaluation, PG&E, Vacaville, California
Project Engineer. Evaluated existing supply well and distribution system
for existing conditions and developed alternatives to renovate system,
construct new well, or abandon groundwater system and connect to local
public supply.
Groundwater Master Plan, Arden Park Water System, Sacramento
County Water Agency, Sacramento, California - Ongoing 5/2004
Project Engineer. Evaluated existing groundwater supply system for
supply reliability, well and asset conditions, distribution system conditions.
Modeled the system using H20 Net for response to peak demands and
developed alternative improvement projects to meet future system needs.
Alternatives included include evaluation of relocated backyard mains, and
incorporation of meters and automated meter reading options.
Assignment
Project Manager
Education
M.S., Environmental Engineering, San
Jose State Universe, 1993
B.S., Civil Engineerfng, Santa Clara
University, 1990
Registrations
Professional Engineer No. 52181,
California
Experience
16 years
Joined Firm
1990
Relevant Expertise
m Water resources planning.
~= Capital improvement project design,
construction, and operations operations
support
· Strategic planning, competitive
reengineering, and privatization
evaluations
-36-
JAMES P. CROWLEY, P.E.
Water Efficiency BMP Strategic Plan, Arden-Cordova System,
Southern California Water Company, Sacramento, California
Project Manager. Evaluated existing performance in meeting Water
Forum BMP goals. Performed cost benefit analysis for continued BMP
implementation and developed strategic plan for use by SCWC in
negotiating next BMP agreement with Water Forum.
Water Efficiency BMP Strategic Plan, Regional Water Authority,
Sacramento, California
Project Engineer. Provided technical support to RWA in assisting
member agencies in evaluating BMP performance and developing strategies
for entering negotiations with Wat~;z Forum for next BMP agreement.
Intake Pumping Station, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities,
Charlotte, North Carolina
Project Engineer. Evaluated existing intake pumps and ancillary
equipment, developed renovation recommendations and design. Assisted
in design and construction engineering of surge relief structure and backup
power diesel generation facility.
US Bureau of Reclamation Water Management Plan Update, San
Juan Water District, Fair Oaks Water District, City of Folsom,
Citrus Heights Water District, City of Roseville, California
Project Manager. Created water planning report and update for US
Bureau requirements. Report included review of contract rights, supply
sources, transfer contracts, conservation practices, and water production.
Coordinated report with Bureau requirements, coordinated draft submittals
and comments with Bureau, provided final report that meets all
Bureau requirements.
Stormwater Collection System, Palo Alto,. California
Design storm drain improvements including drawings and specifications
and provide engineering support during construction.
Master Planning, Cities and Counties of Maui and Honolulu,
Hawaii; Santa Rosa, California; and Benicia, California
Projected future flows based on land use predictions and I/I calculations
and evaluated existing collection system to meet future flows. Provided
alternatives for relief structures and alternative alignments.
I/I Studies, City and County of Oahu, Hawaii
Developed flow monitoring plan to evaluate extent of I/I in collection
system. Evaluated I/I volumes through Hydra and determined
relief requirements.
Rehabilitation and Design, Ojai, California
Evaluated existing collection system condition, projected future flows,
designed replacement of new sewers, prepared contract drawings and
specifications, and applied for SRF loans.
-3?-
JAMES P. CROWLEY, P.E.
Master Plan, City of santa Rosa, California
Project Engineer. Developed a comprehensive stormwater master plan
for the City of Santa Rosa. The project consisted of computer-based
mapping of more than one million feet of storm drain facilities and
modeling of more than 32 miles of the major storm drain system.
Innovative approaches used in this project included an electric'based
mapping system with storm drain overlays and the use of satellite imagery
to estimate stormwater coefficients.
Memberships
American Water Works Association
California Water Environment Assodation
WateReuse
Sacramento Area Water Works Association
Water Environment Federation
3
38
VICE PRESIDENT
PAUL SELSKY, P.E.
Experience Summary
Paul Selsky, manager of the Sacramento/Davis water resources group, an elected member of the Board of
Directors of the Carmichael Water District, and 29 year veteran of the water industry, provides water supply
and treatment planning and design to western water agencies with a regional and policy-level focus. He has
directed or written numerous water master plans involving water needs assessment and has prepared capital
improvement programs for U.S. and international clients. He serves on policy making committees for the
American Water Works Association and the Sacramento Regional Water Authority.
Assignment
Project Officer
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering, Universily of
Virginia, 1976
Registration
Professional Civil Engineer 3495,
Wyoming, 1981
Civil Engineer 43544, California, 1987
Experience
29 years
Joined Firm
1986'
Prior Employment
Nelson Engineering, Jackson, WY 1976-86
National Park Service, Yellowstone NP,
WY, 1975
Virginia Highway Research Council,
Charlottesville, VA, 1974
Relevant Expertise
· Regional water resource policy
development
· Water resources planning and drinking
water studies
[] Watertreatment planning and design
· Water use efficiency
[] Groundwater supply and treatment
;, Grant application strategy development
and preparation
· ' Multi-entity planning group formation
Urban Water Management Plans, t990, 1995, 2000, and 2005
These plans are required to be subm/tted to the California Department of
Water Resources every five years by all California water purveyors that
serve more than 3,000 ac-ft/yr or 3,000 connections. Mr. Selsky has
prepared many of these plans over four cycles of ever increasing
requirements. Ail of these plans describe the water system, develop
demand projections, evaluate water conservation measures, describe
existing and planned sources of water, evaluate water recycling
opportunities, and present water supply reliability data for normal and dry
years. He has prepared these plans for the following water agencies:
Sonoma County Water Agency, Santa Rosa, California, 2004-2006
Project Manager. Plans prepared for City of Santa Rosa, City of
Petaluma, City of Sonoma, Valley of the Moon Water District, Forestville
Water District, City of Rohnert Park, North Marin Water District, Town of
Windsor, and Sonoma County Water Agency.
Placer County Water Agency, Auburn, California, 2005
Project Manager.
Sacramento Suburban Water District~ Sacramento County,
California, 2005 and 2003
Project Officer.
City of Roseville, California, 2005
Project Officer.
San Juan Water District, Granite Bay, California, 2005
Project Officer.
El Dorado Irrigation District, Placerville, California, 2005
Project Officer.
City of Davis, California, 2005 and 1990
Project Officer and Project Manager.
City of Merced, California, 2005 and 2001
Project Officer.
Trabuco Canyon Water District, Orange County, California, 2005
Senior Advisor.
-39-
PAUL SELSKY, P.E.
City of Newport Beach, California, 2005
Senior Advisor.
Valley Center Municipal Water District, California, 2005
Senior Advisor.
City of Vallejo, California, 2002
Senior Advisor.
California Water Service Company, San Jose, California, 2000
Project Manager. Reviewed water recycling opportunities and evaluated
water conservation measures for all 21 water systems throughout California,
including compiling and analyzing demographic data, developing water
savings and cost assumptions for each water conservation Best
Management Practice (BMP). Conducted economic analysis on BMPs.
Citizens Utilities Company of California, Sacramento, California,
1995 and 2000
Project Manager. Prepared the urban water management plans for four
water districts totaling 12 separate water systems (Sacramento County,
Felton [Santa Cruz County], Larkfield [Sonoma County], and Montara [San
Mateo County]).
Orange Vale Mutual Water Company, Sacramento County,
'California, 2000
Project Officer.
City'of Lodi, California, 2000
Project Manager.
Northridge Water District, Sacramento County, California, 2000
Project Manager.
Arcade Water District, Sacramento County, California, 2000
Project Officer.
City of Folsom, California, 1996 and 2000
Project Manager~
Fair Oaks Water District, Sacramento County, California, 2000
Project Manager.
Southern California Water Company, San Dimas, California, 1995
and 2000
Project Manager. Prepared plans for 20 Region I and Region II water
systems located in northern and southern California.
City of Sacramento, California, 199t and 1996
Project Manager. Included a water conservation study in 1991.
City of Davis, California, 1989
Project Manager.
-40-
2
PAUL SELSKY, P.E.
Drinking Water Supply Program, Turlock Irrigation District,
Turlock, California, 1987-2006
Project Manager. The project commenced in the late 80s with a series of
studies that examined the feasibility of a regional water supply system
utilizing Tuolumne River water. Several reports were prepared through
1992 that evaluated current water supply conditions, alternatives, and
provided a recommended project. The project was revisited in 1995 and
2003 with additional studies that developed a smaller project. In hte 2005,
the dties of Turlock, Ceres, Hughson, Keyes, and Modesto decided to
parficpate in the ~egional system. The project will consist of a 42 mgd
surface water treatment plant and approximately 12 miles of pipelines. A
project definition study that will de£me project description details is
currently being prepared. The project is scheduled for construction bidding
in 2008, with completion of construction by 2011.
Water Conservation Master Plan,·Cities of Roseville, Sacramento,
and Folsom, San Juan Water District, Sacramento Suburban
Water District, and Placer County Water Agency, California,
2005-2006
Project Officer. A water conservation technical analysis was prepared for
a group of the large water purveyors in the Sacramento region. The water
purveyors needed the technical analysis to help provide guidance for
possible revisions to water conservation commitments made to the
Sacramento Water Forum. An economic benefit-cost analysis was
performed using both the California Urban Water Conservation Council
Best Management Practices (BMPs) and each purveyor's specific water
conservation agreement. The analysis was conducted using the computer
model developed by Maddaus Water Management. Presentations were
made to clients, Water Forum staff, and stakeholders.
Drought Analysis of the Western Slope of El Dorado County, El
· Dorado County Water Agency and El Dorado Irrigation District,
California, Shingle Springs, California, 2004-2006
Project Officer. M~. Selsky helped develop strategy and approach to the
project, presented at client meetings, conducted a technical review, and
helped develop the project scope. The source of water for the western
slope of E1 Dorado County is primarily surface water from the American
River watershed. Drought planning and preparation is vital for E1 Dorado
County because of the increased risk of water shortages due to a
combination of limits on water supplies from water demand growth and
drought. The drought analysis consisted of obtaining public input, de£ming
drought mitigation actions, and developing a drought management strategy.
A strategic visioning computer model was developed to simulate virtual
droughts and mitigation measures.
Integrated Water Resources Plan, Placer County Water Agency,
Auburn, California, 2004-2006
Project Manager. To develop a clear understanding of future water
demands and how they would be supplied, Placer County Water Agency
(PCWA) contracted with Brown and Caldwell to prepare an Integrated
-41-
PAUL SELSKY, P.E.
Water Resources Plan (IWRP). The study area focuses on west Placer
County, one of the fastest growing areas in California. Cities in the study
area include Roseville, Loomis, Lincoln, Rocklin, and Aubum. The
projected demographics and land use from the respective general plans
provided the basis for developing future build-out of water demand
projections under several growth scenarios. The preliminary results for the
demand projections show that the existing surface water supplies combined
with recycled water and groundwater supply, and additional water
conservation efforts, will provide adequate supply to meet future demand at
buildout. The project represents the first time PCWA used an integrated,
regional planning approach and coordinated ultimate total demand with the
various general Plans within the service area.
Professional Activities/Memberships
American Water Works Association
Surface Water Committee Chair 199849
M22 Manual "Water Meter and Service Line Sizing" Revision 2004 Subcommittee,
member/coauthor
CNNV Section, Water Management Committee, Vice Chair 2002-2003; Chair 2004-
2006
Association of California Water Agencies
Elected to three 4-yr. terms on Board of Directors of Carmichael Water District,
November 1996-2006
Elected to three 1-yr. terms on Sacramento Regional Water Authority Executive
Committee, 2004-2006
Stormwater Advisory Committee, Town of Jackson, Wyoming, 1982
-42-
ENGINEER MELANIE HOLTON, P.E.
Experience Summary
Melanie Holton has prepared urban water management plans for several water systems throughout California,
and she has assisted in the design and permitting for a number of water and wastewater pipeline projects. She
served as a student assistant at the California Department of Water Resources for three years prior to joining
Brown and Caldwell. Her work with the Planning and Flood Management divisions involved field surveys,
data collection and database maintenance, and management of various flood control projects and staff work
for the Reclamation Board.
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering, California State
University, Sacramento, 1998
Registration
Professional Civil Engineer, No. 64983,
California, 2003
Experience
5 years
Joined Firm
1999
Relevant Expertise
m Water resources engineering
= Pipeline design
m Perm~ing
~ Water planning
m Storage tank design.
Urban Water Management Plans, California Water
Service Company
Project Engineer. Evaluated water conservation measures for all 21 water
systems throughout California, including compiling and analyzing
demographic data, developing water savings and cost assumptions for each
water conservation Best Management Practice (BMP). Conducted
extensive economic analysis on BMPs.
Urban Water Management Plans, Citizens Utilities Company
of California
Project Engineer. Evaluated water conservation measures for four water
districts (Sacramento, Felton [Santa Cruz County], Larkfield [Sonoma
County], and Montara [San Mateo County]), including compiling and
analyzing demographic data, developing water savings and cost assumptions
for each water conservation Best Management Practice (BMP). Conducted
extensive economic analysis on BMPs.
Urban Water Management Plans, City of Lodi, California
Project Engineer. Evaluated water consercation measures, including
compiling and analyzing demographic data, developing water savings and
cost assumptions for each water conservation Best Management Practice
(BMP). Conducted extensive economic analysis on BMPs.
Urban Water Management Plans, Southern California
Water Company
Assistant Engineer. Collected demographic data and developed projected
water demands for 21 water systems in Regions I and II located in
Northern and Southern California. Plans describe water systems, develop
demand projections, and evaluate water conservation measures. Estimated
future water demand for residential, commercial and industrial customers.
Urban Water Management Plan, Northridge Water DiStrict,
Sacramento, California
Project Manager. Prepared urban water management plan that describes
water system, develops demand projections, evaluates water conservation
measures, describes existing and planned sources of water available,
presents water supply reliability data for normal and dry years, and
quantifies current and projected amounts of wastewater collected and
treated in service area and potential use for recycled water.
MELANIE HOLTON, P.E.
Urban Water Management Plan, Arcade Water District,
Sacramento, California
Project Engineer. Prepared urban xvater management plan that describes
water system, develops demand projections, evaluates water conservation
measures, describes existing and planned sources of water available,
presents water supply reliability data for normal and dry years, and
quantifies current and projected amounts of wastewater collected and
treated in service area and potential use for recycled water.
Urban Water Management Plan, City of Folsom, California
Project Engineer. Prepared urban water management plan that describes
water system, develops demand projections, evaluates water conservation
measures, describes existing and planned sources of water available,
presents water supply reliability data for normal and dry years, and
quantifies current and projected amounts of wastewater collected and
treated in service area and potential use for recycled water.
Urban Water Management Plan, Orange Vale Water 'Company,
Orangevale, California
Project Engineer. Prepared urban water management plan that describes
water system, develops demand projections, evaluates water conservation
measures, describes existing and planned sources of water available,
presents water supply reliability data for normal and dry years, and
quantifies current and projected amounts of wastewater collected and
treated in service area and potential use for recycled water.
Water Treatment Plant Permitting and Storage Tank Design,
Diablo Grande Limited Partnership/Western Hills Water District~
Stanislaus County, California
Project Engineer. Permitted and provided utility coordination with
Department of Health Services for the design of a new water treatment
plant for the Diablo Grande resort development. Designed 1.25 million
gallon storage tank.
Groundwater Resources Plan, United States Agency for
International Development (USAID), Honduras, Central America
Project Engineer. Assisted with report preparation and geologic mapping
for a comprehensive hydrogeologic study to assess the available water
supply in five cities affected by Hurricane Mitch~ The results of these
studies will be used to determine if groundwater resources can adequately
meet current and future municipal demands and to develop a
comprehensive water resource plan for each municipality. The project
involves installing more than 15 wells, aquifer tests, geologic mapping, and
comprehensive reports.
Water Supply Improvements and Pipeline Design, Confidential
Client, Sacramento County, California
Project Engineer. Researched and assisted in design of a 4,500 foot~ 24
inch pipeline into a water treatment plant as part of a replacement water
Supply facilities plan. Coordinated with utilities affected by project
alignment and managed all regulatory permitting issues.
-44-
MELANIE HOLTON, P.E.
Wellhead and Transmission Main Design, Confidential Client,
Rancho Cordova, California
Project Engineer. Provided permitting and utility coordination in the
design of a wellhead pump and piping to connect a well to the existing
distribution main. Coordinated with utilities affected by project alignment
and managed all regulatory permitting issues, including the Department of
Health Services Drinking Water Source Assessment Program (DWSAP)
well site assessment.
Replacement Water Supply Facilities Plan, Southern California
Water Company, Rancho Cordova, California
Project Engineer. Analyzed loss of water supply occurring in Cordova
System. Defined water rights holders on American River and Water Forum
diveriions and compared to Hodge minimum flow requirements.
Developed implementation schedule for additional water supplies for
Cordova System.
Cordova System Water Management Plan, Southern California
Water Company, Sacramento County, California
Assistant Engineer. Participated in preparation of the future water supply
report and water management plan for the Cordova Water System to fulfill
the requirements of the California Urban Water Management Planning Act
and the reporting requirements of the California Urban Water Conservation
Council. Prepared report sections on historical and projected water use and
water shortage contingency plans.
CalFed Bay/Delta Grant and Proposition 13 Funding Applications,
Various Clients, California
Project Engineer. Submitted successful applications for more than $1.7
million in federal funding grants through the CalFed Bay/Delta grant
program for California municipalities.
California Department of Water Resources, Division of Flood
Management, Sacramento, California
Engineer. Planned, organized, and supported flood control project and
study activities. Represented The Reclamation Board and the Department
of Water Resources while acting as a liaison to the Corps of Engineers,
local government agencies and Department Divisions. Performed quality
control reviews of project work to assure conformance with contract plans
and specifications before State acceptance of projects.
Memberships
American Society of Civil Engineers
Sacramento Professional Section, Outstanding Academic Achievement Award, 1998
California State University, Sacramento, Student Chapter, Outstanding Service Award, 1998
Golden Key National Honor Society
Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society
Upsilon Chapter, Secretary, Fall 1997
American Water Works Association
WATER RESOURCES CAROL LAZZAROTTO
Experience Summary
! III IIIII
Education
M.S. Public Policy, Universify of California,
Berkeley, 1984
B.A. Political Science, Univers~ of
California, Berkeley, 1981
Experience
22 years
Joined Firm
2005
Urban Water Management Plans
Project Scientist. Assisted on preparing UWMPs for several entities,
including: City of Folsom, City of Sacramento, City of Daly City, City of
Antioch, Citizens Utilities service areas, Southern California Water
Company service areas; and the seven retail agencies served by Sonoma
County Water AgenCy.
Water Management Plan, Southern California Water Company
Staff Scientist. Prepared water supply portion of the Clear Lake District
water management plan. Plan described water systems, developed demand
projections, evaluated water conservation measures, and evaluated water
supply alternatives.
Environmental Assessment/initial Study (EA/IS) for Folsom Outlet
Modifications, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
Project Manager Managed preparation of the EA/IS and Biological
Assessment to construct a redundant outlet works for the cities of Roseville
and Folsom, and San Juan Water District. Project required coordination
with the purveyors as stakeholders, with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
which operates the dam, the engineering consulting firm that is designing
the modifications, and the three fisheries agencies via Section 7 consultation
under the ESA. Participated in a VELB survey at the dam site, which
required coordination and participation with the Corps, Reclamation,
SAFCA, and UC Davis VELB experts.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Water Assignment
Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), SMUD
Project Manager Managed completion of FEIR to support the
assignment of 30,000 acre-feet per year of SMUD's Central Valley Project
water to Sacramento County Water Agency for use in the county's Zone 40
Service Area (south-central Sacramento County). Responding to comments
requires re-analysis of hydrologic modeling output with regard to
downstream water supply and water quality impacts.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation/Department of Water ResourceslCDM
Federal Programs~ Environmental Water Account (EWA)
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental impact Report
Managed four staff in the preparation of the environmental documentation
required to implement the EWA. Oversaw the initial preparation of the
Action Specific Implementation Plan (ASIP) which, tiering off the
CALFED Multi-Species Conservation Strategy, evaluated the EWA
Proposed Action's effects on evaluated species and habitats. This work
included coordinating frequent meetings and consultations with USFWS,
NOAA Fisheries, and CDFG, as well as the USBR and DWR.
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA), Long-Term
Agreement for Reoperation of Folsom Dam and Reservoir
Environmental Assessment (EA)
-46-
CAROL LAZZAROTTO
Project Manager. Coordinated the preparation of an EA for indefinitely
extending the Folsom Dam and Reservoir Reoperafion Agreement with
Reclamation to support the various flood control alternatives identified by
SAFCA. Assisted in the preparation of the aesthetics, biological, water
quality, population and housing, and hydropower impact analyses for
the EA.
Placer County Water Agency/U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR),
American River Pump Station Project EIS/EIR
Project Planner. Assisted in the preparation of the EIS/EIR for the
American River Pump Station Project. The project involved construction
and operation of a year-round pumping facility for PCWA that will divert
water from the North Fork American River in the vicinity of the Auburn
Dam construction site, dose the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel, and restore
the three-quarter mile reach of the river that was dewatered and impacted
by activities associated with Auburn Dam construction. Prepared the
impact analyses for water supply, water quality, noise, and visual resources
for the EIS/EIR.
USBR, American River Basin Cumulative Impact Report
Project Planner. Assisted in the evaluation of cumulative impacts within
the American River Basin due to increased diversions from federal actions
involving the USBR Central Valley Project. Key resource issues included
direct and indkect cumulative effects of reasonably foreseeable American
River-related projects on endangered, threatened, and other special-status
aquatic and terrestrial species and habitats along components of the Central
Valley Project and within over 20 water service areas in Sacramento, Placer,
and El Dorado counties.
City of Sacramento, Fish Screen Replacement Project
Environmental Assessment/Initial Study
Project Planner. Assisted in the preparation of an EA/IS for the
replacement of fish screens at the Sacramento River Water Treatment Plant
and the Fairbairn Water Treatment Plant on the American River. Prepared
impact analyses for the following issues: water quality, flood control, noise
and public safety. This project involved potential impacts on listed and
proposed anadromous and resident fish species, as well as agency-
interrelated water diversion issues on the lower American and Sacramento
rivers.
City of Sacramento, Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project
Environmental Assessment/Initial Study
Project Planner. Assisted in the preparation of an EA/IS for the
expansion of the Sacramento River and E.A. Fairbaim water supply intake
structures on the American River. Prepared analyses of the impact of the
increased diversion for the following issues: water supply, water quality,
cultural and recreation. This project required close coordination with the
Reclamation, NOB_& Fisheries, and the USFWS in addressing issues dealing
with listed and proposed anadromous and resident fish species.
Initial Study for River Pumping Station Expansion and Installation
of New Raw Water Pipeline~ City of Antioch
Project Scientist. Prepared Initial Study and Negative Declaration, which
2
CAROL LAZZAROTTO
included obtaining a permit modification from the Corps and a water
quality certification from the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Central Valley Region.
Initial Study for Storm Drain Detention Pond, City of Dixon
Project Manager. Managed preparation of an Initial Study and Mitigated
Negative Declaration for a storm drain detention pond and outfall.
District Services Plan EIR, Fresno Metropolitan Flood
Control District
Staff Scientist. Assisted in preparation of EIR for updated District
Services Plan. Prepared land use, air quality, cultural resources,
transportation, public health, and recreation sections of EIR.
Water Forum (City/County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning),
Fisheries and Aquatic Habitat Management Plan for the Lower
American River (Part of the River Corridor Management Plan)
Assistant Project Manager. Assisted in the preparation of the Fisheries
and Aquatic Habitat Management Plan for the lower American River, which
includes an ecological and biological monitoring plan that will establish the
baseline for assessing the health of the river. Played a key role in
developing a graphic tool for identifying the temporal and geographic use
of habitat along the lower American River for fish species of management
concern. This graphic tool received a commendation from the lead
CALFED scientist, and has since been used and re£med for other large
watershed projects.
Playa Capitol Company, Ballona Wetlands Restoration Project
Operations and Maintenance Manual, Phase 1
Project Manager. Managed the preparation of an operations and
maintenance manual for a created freshwater wetland. The wetland
includes a freshwater marsh and riparian corridor, and will include
restoration of a salt marsh in a future phase. Assisted in identifying water
quality resources issues, including coordinating water quality monitoring
programs, integrating water quality requirements with biological resources
and flood control objectives, and evaluating opporttmities for efficient
conduct of operation and maintenance activities.
Stanislaus River and Calaveras River Watershed Sanitary
Surveys, Stockton East Water DiStrict, Calaveras County Water
District~ and Tuolumne Utilities District
Project Manager. Managed the preparation of watershed sanita~ surveys,
which required coordinating the interests of several agencies which draw
water from the river, as well as working with the California Department of
Health Services to ensure approval of the report and recommendations.
Investigated potential sources of contamination in the watershed from
point and nonpoint sources, and evaluated and made recommendations
regarding watershed management practices.
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
JENNIFER GAIN, E.I.T.
Experience Summary
Jennifer Gain is an environmental engineer in the water resources practice. Her Master's thesis was focused
on evaluating the efficiency of recharge operations with a particular emphasis on the development of field
techniques for quantifying spatial and temporal variations of infiltration rates, thereby targeting key
controlling mechanisms related to recharge efficiency. She has performed a variety of fieldwork at lakes,
rivers, sludge ponds, and wastewater treatment facilities. She has assisted with resyoration projects, watershed
assessments, development of an Urban Water Management Plan, and development of a Storm Water
Management Plan to meet Phase II NPDES requirements.
Education
M.S., Environmental Engineering,
University of Arizona, 2003
B.S., Civil & Environmental Engineering,
West Virginia Universily, 2001, Graduated
Cum Laude
Registrations
Engineer-In-Training, No. 7743, West
Virginia, 2001
Safety Training
40-hour HAZWOPER
Experience
3 years
Joined Firm
2003
Urban Water Management Plan, Sonoma County Water Agency,
Sonoma County, California
Project Engineer. Researching, writing, and preparing the water supply
chapter of the 2005 Urban Water Management Plans for eight cities and
water districts in Sonoma County, as well as the Sonoma County Water
Agency. This plan is requLted by the California Department of Water
Resources for all water suppliers to forecast the water supply and demand
for its area until the year 2030. Chapters in the plan include descriptions of
the water distribution system, historical and projected water use, water
supply, water conservation, and recycled water for the service areas covered
by the plan. The plans are being written for the following service areas:
Santa Rosa, Petaluma, City of Sonoma, Valley of the Moon, Forestville,
Rohnert Park, North Matin, Windsor, and Sonoma County Water Agency.
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, California State Coastal
Conservancy, California
Project Manager. Working with the California State Coastal Conservancy
as part of the Philip Williams & Associates team. Developing a plan for the
restoration of 15,000 acres of area historically operated by Cargill Salt into
natural systems of tidal marsh and managed ponds. Focusing particularly
on water and sediment quality issues, including mercuq~ methyladon.
Working to coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
integrate the Corps' South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Study and the Salt
Pond project through the Corps' reconnaissance milestone to provide long-
ten-n project funding for restoration and flood management.
Moffett Field Tidal Restoration Feasibility Study, U.S. National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Moffett Field,
California
Project Manager. As an area adjacent to the South Bay Salt Pond
Restoration project,.NASA has been pressured to restore a stormwater
retention pond in Moffett Field to tidal salt marsh. The project team
evaluated the technical and fiscal feasibility of such restoration. The project
team developed and evaluated three main alternatives - a no action
alternative, full tidal restoration, and partial tidal restoration - focusing on
stormwater retention, physical processes, biological habitat, and applicable
regulations. The team evaluated the existing stormwater conditions and
JENNIFER GAIN, E.I.T.
examined the impacts of removing existing stormwater storage facilities. A
hydrologic model was created in order to determine if tidal action could
absorb the stormwater without causing flooding.
Water Quality Monitoring and Watershed Assessment, Turlock
Irrigation District, California
Project Manager. The Turlock Irrigation District (TID) system discharges
agricultural and urban runoff to the Harding Drain, the Tuolumne River,
the Merced River, and the San Joaquin River, all of which are included on
California's 303(d) list, which requires TMDLs. Performed QA/QC for
results of water quality monitoring laboratory tests to ensure reliable results
were being provided to the client.
Evaluated technical and fiscal feasibility of potential treatment facility to
reuse agricultural and urban flows and eliminate discharges to rivers by
creating a closed-loop system.
Prepared and submitted comments to the State Water Resources Control
Board to present an analysis of recent data and information supporting the
delisting of a waterbody from the revised 2006 303(d) list. Constituents
analyzed included ammonia, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and mercury.
Managing project funded through CALFED grant for evaluation of
Harding Drain Watershed agricultural and urban impacts. Developing and
implementing a monitoring plan to collect water quality data in target
locations. Working with TID staff to implement a watershed assessment
and water quality monitoring program for the Harding Drain to determine
sources of unknown toxicity impairment 003(d) listing). The grant also
provides for education of growers and support to help implement
agricultural BMPs.
Storm Water Management Program, City of Rio Vista, California
Projec.t Manager. The City of Rio Vista, an NPDES Phase II designated
municipality, required the development of a Storm Water Management
Program (SWMP). The components of the program were centered on the
six Minimum Control Measures, as outlined by the EPA, and focused on
meeting regulatory compliance, as well as promoting beneficial water quality
pracuces. Served as project manager with other responsibilities, including
the assisted development of the program and draft, as well as client
interactions.
Flow Meter Outfali Calibration, Orange County Sanitation District,
Fountain Valley, California
Project Engineer. The Orange County Sanitation District sought to
evaluate the accuracy of a new effluent outfall flow meter. The request was
met by conducting a dye calibration study for which fluorometric analyses
were performed to trace the flow ofwastewater between two points.
Responsibilities included assisting in field work consisting of wastewater
sample collection and analytical testing.
-50-
2
JENNIFER GAIN, E.I,T,
Solids Lagoon Characterization Surveys, Naps Sanitation District,
Naps, California
Project Engineer. Performed field survey at the Soscol Wastewater
Recycling Facility to quantify the volume and solids mass in a 108-acre
solids lagoon. Assisted in use of custom vacuum-assist coring system and
pressure core sample extraction from a custom portable sampling barge.
Also assisted in the collection of core samples to evaluate the depth,
volume, and physical characteristics of sludge layers in ponds.
Assessment of Quarry Mining Potential Impacts to Groundwater
Quality, Vulcan Materials Company, Sanger, California
Project Engineer. Assisted in the evaluation of potential impacts to
groundwater quality as a result of gravel quarry mining. Prepared work plan
and health and safety plan for field sampling of pond water to evaluate
potential impacts of blasting on surface water quality of exposed
groundwater. Collected water quality samples at mine.
Water Supply Assessment, Confidential Property Owner,
Mariposa County, California
Project Engineer. The property was desired to become a site of
agricultural activxty. However, with extremely limited surface water supplies
the need for a hydrogeologic assessment was evident. Conducted fracture
trace/lineament analyses and a field survey to assist in the geologic mapping
of the property.
Automated Measurement of Surface Infiltration Rates, Tucson
Water, Tucson, Arizona
University of Arizona Graduate Student Researcher. Performed two-
year study examining the automated measurement of surface infiltration
rates at a secondary effluent recharge basin. The research focused'on the
development and perfection of a field design and an automated method for
measurement of surface infiltration rates. Analysis of collected data on
temporal and spatial scales was also a key component. Specific controlling
mechanisms that dixectly influenced recharge efficiency were evaluated and
identified. Recommendations for improvements of recharge basin design,
operation, and maintenance schedules were addressed.
Memberships
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Chi Epsilon
Publications and Presentations
1. "The Measurement and Analysis of Surface Infiltration Rates at a Secondary Effluent
Recharge Basin," Thesis, University of Adzona, 2003.
2. "Measuring Localized Surface Infiltration Rates in Secondary Effluent Recharge Basins.'
Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Symposium on Groundwater Recharge, Phoenix,
Adzona, June 5-L 2003.
3. "Measuring Localized Surface Infiltration Rates in Secondary Effluent Recharge Basins."
Paper presented at the Wodd Water and Environmental Resources Congress and Related
Symposia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 23-26, 2003.
-51-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. Solbrig
Difecco[s
Tom Comt,~
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Duane Wallace
EHc 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614, www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDAITEM6a
TO:
· Board of Directors
FROM:
Paul Sciuto, Assistant General Manager
MEETING DATE:
May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Economic Analysis, Proposition 50 IRWMP Grant
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve proposal from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
to prepare the District's Economic Analysis that is required for the Proposition 50
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) grant, in the amount of $30,000.
DISCUSSION: The District is a partner in the Proposition 50 IRWMP grant with three
pending projects, (1)waterline replacement, (2)water conservation program and
(3) Indian Creek Reservoir TMDL. A requirement of the grant is that an economic
analysis of these projects, along with the nine other projects that comprise the grant, be
completed. This economic analysis is weighted heavily in determining whether the grant
will be awarded. As it requires an extensive evaluation of each project, a consultant is
needed with the expertise to perform the analysis, and return the results by the grant
deadline.
Partners within the grant will be sharing the costs of the economic analysis. In the
interest of completing the work in a timely manner and ensuring the economic analysis
is performed .competitively, staff requests the District act as the lead in contracting for
these services.
Proposals were requested from two consulting firms. One declined due to the tight time
frame. Due to this grant deadline, staff recommends acceptance of the proposal
received from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants.
SCHEDULE: Select consultant by May 4, 2006, start the project immediately, and
complete by the grant deadline of June 8, 2006
COSTS: $30,000
ACCOUNT NO: Unbudgeted
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS: Scope of work from Kennedy/Jenks
-53-
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES //~
CHIEF FINANCIAL oFFICER: YES
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Water
-54-
26 April 2006
Mr. Paul Sciuto, P.E.
Assistant General Manager/Engineer
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Subject:
Proposal for Professional Services to Assist in Preparation of Proposition 50,
Chapter 8 for South Tahoe Public Utility District
K/J R06005
Dear Mr. Sciuto:
Attached is 'the scope and budget for assisting South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) in the
preparation of a grant application for the Proposition 50, Chapter 8 Integrated Regional Water
Management Program (IRWMP) Implementation, Step 2 program administered by the State of
California Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board.
The lump sum fee is $30,000.
We will begin upon approval by the District on May 4, 2006 and complete the work on the June
8, 2006 deadline for the grant application.
Please contact me if you have any questions. We look forward to assisting the District in this
project.
Very truly yours,
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
Lynn H. Orphan, P.E.
Senior Engineer
LHO/Id
Enclosures
cc: file - Reno
Sachi Itagaki, K/J- Palo Alto
w:\proposals\lttr-pro\2OOS",rO6OOS~stpud prop 50~6005 - stpud prop 50doc
55
Scope of Work - South Tahoe Public Utility District
Assistance in Preparation of Proposition 50 Chapter 8,
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, Implementation Grants,
Step 2
Background: The South Tahoe Public Utility District (DiStrict) has been a key
stakeholder in the Tahoe Sierra Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP).
A number of projects have been identified that are critical to improving water quality and
water supply reliability. The District lead an effort to coordinate a Step I Implementation
Grant Application under Proposition 50 Chapter 8 Integrated Regional Water
Management (IRWM) Plan to implement these projects and was called back to submit
Step 2 of the grant process. Preparation of the Step 2 grant application will require an
economic analysis of water supply and water quality benefits as described in the draft
Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP) issued by the California Department of Water
Resources, the administrator of the grant program.
Task 1: Grant Application Cost and Benefits Questionnaire
This task is for Kennedy/Jenks to prepare a list of questions and request for information
from all of the fifteen project sponsors. Kennedy/Jenks will distribute the questionnaire
and follow up with the sponsors to Obtain information and discuss the projects as the
economic analysis is being conducted. The district will assist by providing the names
and contact information for individuals at each sponsor entity. Kennedy/Jenks may
conduct a workshop meeting if necessary.
Task 2: Kennedy/Jenks Preparation of Attachments
This task is for Kennedy/Jenks to prepare attachments to the application identified in the
IRWMP part 2, Implementation Grant Application. Deliverables for each sub-task
include three double sided hard-copies, an electronic file in a Microsoft program
compatible format or an Adobe portable document format (PDF) format uploaded to the
State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) on-line Financial Assistance
Application Submittal Tool (FAAST) system, one hard copy of all plans and specs, and
a CD containing all supporting documents and files over 10 MBs.
Kennedy/Jenks will participate in meetings and/or conference calls with the project
proponents to clarify the project intent. These meetings and/or conference calls are
accounted for in Task 4.
Sub-task 2-A: Attachment 6. Budget
This sub-task is to prepare summary budget for each project as broken down into the
following cost components as required in Exhibit B of the PSP.
1
56
(a) Direct Project Administration Costs
(b) Land Purchase/Easement
(c) Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental Documentation
(d) Construction/Implementation
(e) Environmental Compliance/Mitigation/Enhancement
(f) Construction Administration
(g) Other
(h) Construction/Implementation Contingency
(i) Grant Total
(j) Calculation of Funding Match
(k) List of the soume of funds for Non-State Share
It is assumed that each member agency will provide an estimate that has been broken
down for the individual projects with appropriate descriptions of the work from Sub-task
2-5 above into the cost components above. The costs for the individual projects, as
provided by the agencies, will also be provided in the grant application. The summary
cost estimate will be used for Table 1 - FAAST Checklist, Total Budget.
It is anticipated that Kennedy/Jenks will prepare the summary budget concurrently with
the District preparing the Attachment 5. Work Plan under Sub-task 3-E
Sub-task 2-B: Attachment 7. Schedule
This sub-task is to prepare a Project schedule that shows the sequence and timing of
implementation of the individual projects in the proposal. As required in the PSP, the
schedule will show May 1,2007, as the assumed effective date of the grant agreement.
The schedule will show the start and end dates for each milestone and will be in a
horizontal bar Or Gantt chart format. The schedule is intended to demonstrate that
related elements of the IRWM Plan will be completed even though they are not
proposed for grant funding in this application.
As described in the PSP, the following work items, as applicable, will be included in the
schedule for each project, as well as for the proposal itself:
· California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) preparation and completion;
· Project design and bid solicitation process;
· Acquisition of land, or rights of way, if required;
· Identification and acquisition of all necessary permits;
· Construction start and end dates;
· Environmental mitigation or enhancement efforts;
· Post implementation, construction, and monitoring efforts; and
· Any other work items that may be required but are not listed above.
2
-57-
Sub-task 2-C: Attachment 10. Economic Analysis- Water Supply and
Water Quality Benefits
This sub-task is to prepare a detailed economic analysis of the costs and benefits due
to the water supply and water quality aspects of the proposal. This attachment will be
developed in accordance with Exhibit C of the PSP in a manner consistent with other
Proposition 50 applications. Kennedy/Jenks will provide assistance from its
subconsultant, Stratus Consulting, a specialty firm in the field of resource economics
that is currently preparing similar economic analyses for Proposition 50 grant
applications.
Sub-task 2-D: Attachment 11, Other Expected Benefits
This sub-task is similar to Attachment 10 but considers benefits other than water supply
and water quality. This attachment will also be developed in accordance with Exhibit C
of the PSP.
Task 3'- District Preparation of Grant Application
District staff will prepare all of the grant application, attachments and exhibits, except
those specifically assigned to Kennedy/Jenks in Task 2. Kennedy/Jenks will provide
reasonable technical and graphic support to District staff to help complete these
application elements. The application elements to be prepared 'by the District include
those described in Task 3.
Sub-task '3-A: Attachment 1. Authorizing Documentation/Eligible
Applicant
Prepare the authorizing resolution for adoption by the District board and eligible
applicant documentation. The District will provide the documentation necessary to
substantiate the District's eligibility to apply for the grant. Documentation includes a
copy of the letter to DWR indicating a 2002 UWMP has been completed and approved
as well as a discussion and copy of all applicable Groundwater Management Plans.
Legal agreements between the District and partner agencies to ensure grant proposal
and tracking of funds will need to be described.
Sub-task 3-B: Attachment 2. Consistency with Minimum IRWM Plan
Standards
Document how the Plan meets the minimum IRWM Plan Standards as described in
Appendix A of the Guidelines and identified below. This will include use of a summary
checklist or table identifying the plan standards and where in the IRWM plan the
information is located. The plan standards are provided below:
A. Regional Agency or RegiOnal Water Management Group
B. Region Description
3
-58-
C. Objectives
D. Water Management Strategies
E. Integration
F. Regional Priorities
G. Implementation
H. Impacts and Benefits
I. Technical Analysis and Plan Performance
J. Data Management
K. Financing
L. Statewide Priorities
M. Relation to Local Planning
N. Stakeholder Involvement
O. Coordination
Sub-task 3-C: Attachment 3. Adopted IRWM Plan or Functionally
Equivalent Plan, and proof of formal adoption
As described in the PSP, evidence of formal adoption of the foundational and additional
documents linking the alternate documents into a functionally equivalent plan must be
provided (or a schedule for adoption) by 1 January 2007. Preparation of a combined
IRWM Plan which includes both the District and Ventura County wide regions is
currently under development by Ventura County and is assumed to be adopted prior to
January 2007. However, a schedule for adoption will need to be prepared to include
with this attachment.
Sub-task 3-D: Attachment 4. Consistency with IRWM Plan Standards
Document further how the plan meets the IRWM Plan requirements listed above. It is
anticipated that this attachment will build on Attachment 2 above and include sub-
sections that address each standard and the requirements stated in the Guidelines for
that standard.
Sub.task 3-E'. Attachment 5. Work Plan
Document specific projects within the proposal. It will include an introduction section
and a Work Items section, a table and a map that summarizes the group of projects.
In accordance with the Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP), the introduction will
include:
A presentation of the Goals and Objective of the Proposal.
A description of how the Proposal is consistent with the adopted IRWM Plan.
A table of specific projects in the Proposal, including, an abstract of each project,
the current status of each project in terms of percent completion of design, the
priority of those projects, and implementing agencies.
4
59
· A description of synergies or linkages between projects that result in added
value, or require coordinated implementation or operation.
· A map showing the location of project(s) contained in the Proposal and also
showing the regional boundaries.
· A description of the work that has been completed or is expected to be
completed prior to May 1, 2007, the assumed contract execution date. For
example, if CEQA/NEPA and other environmental compliance efforts have been
completed discuss the environmental determination made by the lead agency
and the documents that were filed.
· Procedures by which the applicant will coordinate with its partner agencies and
organizations that may receive funding from the grant including any contracts,
MOUs, and other formal agreements.
· A discussion of standards, such as construction standards, health and safety
standards, laboratory analysis, or accepted classifications methods that will be
used in implementation..
· Development of PAEPs, MPs, and QAPPs for the Proposal.
· A discussion of the status of acquisition of land or rights-of-way, if applicable.
· A discussion of the merits of the building materials or computational methods that
were or will be used for project development, such as use of specific grades of
building materials or use of specific, tested, and established models (or
software). Also discuss the status of project design and bid solicitation efforts.
· Identification of all necessary permits and the status of securing such permit.
· A discussion of the status of preparation and completion of requirements to
comply with the CEQA, NEPA, and other environmental laws. If environmental
compliance efforts have not been completed, include a plan for environmental
compliance. Discuss the status of environmental mitigation or enhancement
actions.
· A description of submittals tothe granting agency for assessing progress and
accomplishments, such as quarterly and final reports.
· Any other work items that may be applicable to describe implementation of the
projects but are not listed above.
Sub-task 3-F: Attachment 8. Scientific and Technical Merit
Documentation of the description of the scientific and technical merit for the proposal
and each project contained within the proposal. A discussion of the technical adequacy
of the data and feasibility of each project will be provided.
Sub-task 3-G: Attachment 9. Monitoring Assessment and Performance
Measures
Discussion of the project monitoring, assessment, and performance measures that will
ensure project goals and outcomes are achieved. As part of this attachment project
5
-60-
performance measurement tables will be completed for each project which will include
the following information:
· Project goals
· Desired outcomes
· Output indicators
· Outcome indicators
· Measurement tools and methods
· Targets
Projects with the same goals and outcomes may be combined in the same table. Any
completed Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan (PAEP), Monitoring Plans, or
Quality Assurance Project Plans may be submitted as supporting documentation.
Sub.task 3-H: Attachment 12. Program Preferences
Discussion on how the proposed projects meet the Program Preferences as described
in Section II.E of the Guidelines as follows:
· Include integrated projects with multiple benefits;
· Support and improve local and regional water supply reliability;
· Contribute expeditiously and measurably to the long-term containment and
maintenance of water quality standards;
· Eliminate or significantly reduce pollution in impaired waters and sensitive habitat
areas, including areas of special biological significance;
· Include safe.drinking water and water quality projects that serve disadvantaged
communities; or
· Include groundwater management and recharge projects that are located 1) in
San Bernardino or Riverside counties; 2) outside the service area of the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California; and 3) within one mile of
established residential and commercial development.
Sub-task 3-h Attachment 13. Statewide Priorities
Prepare a discussion on how the proposed projects in the proposal meets the Statewide
Priorities as described in Section II.F of the Guidelines as follows.
Reduce conflict between water users or resolve water rights disputes, including
interregional water rights issues;
· Implement Total Maximum Daily Loads that are established or under
development;
· Implement Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Watershed
Management Initiative Chapters, plans, and policies;
6
-61-
· Implement the SWRCB's Non-point Source (.NPS) Pollution Plan;
· Assist in meeting Delta Water Quality Objectives;
· Implement recommendations of the floodplain management taSk force,
desalination task force, recycling task force, or state species recovery plan;
· Address environmental justice concerns; and
· Assist in achieving one or more goals of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program.
Sub-task 3-J: Attachment 14. Changes from Step I to Step 2
Prepare a discussion of the necessary modifications to the proposal that occurred
between Step 1 and Step 2. These changes include modifications to improve the IRWM
Plan, modifications to the project list to reduce the total funding request to $25 million,
and changes in the schedule to reflect the revised proposal.
Sub-task 3-K: Attachment 15. Modification of River or Stream Channel
(If applicable)
Prepare a discussion of any river or stream channel modification resulting from
implementation of a project included in the Work Plan. Documentation on the
environmental impacts and discussion of the balance between the potential project
benefits and mitigation requirements will be provided.
Sub-task 3-L: Attachment 16, CALFED ROD Consistency
Complete Form 1 from Exhibit E of the PSP for each project that is consistent with any
of the CALFED Bay-Delta program goals.
· Sub-task 3-M: Attachment 17. Letters of Support or Opposition
Compile various letters of support.
Sub.task 3-N: Graphics
Prepare graphics to support the grant application. Graphics are expected to include:
· Maps from either USGS topo or GIS files available
· Extraction and/or or modification of figures prepared from existing maps or
graphics
· New graphics to illustrate concepts of integration or other relevant topics
· Application cover
7
-62-
Task 4: Project Management, Quality and Communications
Kennedy/Jenks will provide project management and communication to attain District
satisfaction and compliance with the contract terms.
Sub-task 4-1: Project Management
This sub-task includes project management functions including coordination of
Kennedy/Jenks staff, internal project setup, review of project status repods, preparation of
monthly billings, and other project management duties.
Sub-task 4-2: Quality Assurance/Quality Control
This sub-task includes quality assurance/quality control review on a technical and editorial
basis.
Sub-task 4-3 Meetings and Conference Calls
This sub-task includes conducting up to eight conference calls and two meetings with
Kennedy/Jenks staff at the District office.
8
-63-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
t~chard H. Solbrig
Oire('.Cors
Tom ¢omt~
James R. Jones
Mary Leu Mosbacher
Duane Wallac~
Eric 9chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614, w .~.stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6b
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Randy Curtis, Manager of Field Operations
MEETING DATE:
May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: 2006 Asphalt Patching ServiCes
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Award bid to the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder.
DISCUSSION: Underground Repair WatedSewer complete repairs of numerous
waterline leaks and services tie-ins, then temporary patch repairs are made to the
damaged or cut out asphalt. When the weather permits, professional paving contractors
must permanently repair these patches. Bids will be opened on May 2, 2006. A
summary of all bids, along with a staff recommendation will be distributed prior to, and
at the Board meeting.
SCHEDULE: Spring, Summer, and Fall 2006
COSTS: Estimated $130,000
ACCOUNT NO: 2001-6052, 1001-6052
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: 05/06 1001-6052 $15,588,
05/06 2001-6052 $73,895 06/07 1001-6052 $50,117, 2001-6052 $248,861
ATTACHMENTS: City of South Lake Tahoe paving requirements; Summary of bids to
be distributed prior to, and at the Board meeting.
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES /~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES If~¥'Y'~C--- NO
CATEGORY: Water & Sewer
NEW PAVEMENT 4" MIN. IN TWO
SAWCUT TO A NEAT STRAIGHT ~ NEW 6' AGG BASE. COMPAC~D TO 95~: R.C.
APPLYTACK COAT TO EDC.~ PRIOR TO PA
~-' NAIVE BACK FILL COMPACTED TO 90~[ R.C.
~ PROPOSED U31UTY
~ 12' BO~I SIDES
0'~6~'~ f BEDDING MA3ERIAL
rain
UNDISTURBED EARTH
NA'IWE MA~RAL AT
~-- 90~ RELATIVE COMPAC~ON
TO 6' BELOW BoTroM OF
BEDDING MATERIAL
1/2 O0 OR 1'
pAVEMENT PATCH AND AGGREGAll~ BASE MATERIAL
SHAM. EX3EN0 BEYONO TRENCH 12" MIN. EACH SIDE.
EX PAVEMENT
.~ (VARIES IN DEPTH)
EX BASE
(VARIES IN DEPTH)
NOTES:
AC S~IALL BE 'CITY MIX' AR--8OOO OR APPRO~-O EQUAL
POLYMER BONDED AC MAY BE REQUIRED ON SOME ROADWAYS.
WHERE REMAINING PAVEMENT WIDTH FROM SAWCUT UNE TO
GUTTER, CURB, OR EDGE' OF PAVEMENT IS LESS THAN 24" FOR
AC. FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR SHALL EX3~=J~D TO GUTTER,
CURB, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
ALL R.O.W. IMPROVEMENTS AFFECTED IN CONJUCTION WITH PROPOSED WORK
SHALL BE REPLACED TO CI~I' STANDARDS.
CITY APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES.
SECTION A-A
TRANSVERSE TRENCH PAVEMENT RESTORATION
HTS
CiTY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TRANSVERSE TRENCH PAVEMENT RESTORA31ON
STANDARD
~ AM) Ch~L~Y
P~N
PROPOSED UTILITY
0.165' DEEP AC COLD MILL AND O~[RLAY
'CITY MIX AR 8000 AC OR APPROVqEO EQUAL
VARIES
~ID'IH OF TRAVEL LANE.. 12' TYP.)
SAWCUT TO A NEAT STRAIGHT
APPLY TACK COAT TO EDGE PRIOR TO PAVtNO
NE~ PAVEMENT 4.' MtN, IN TWO UFTS
6' AC,~ BASE: COMPACTED TO gs~ R.C.
SECTION A-A
COAT EDOE
EX PAVEMENT
VARIES IN DEPTH)
EX BASE
(V~ES a oe=m)
NOT~:S:
AC SHAll BE 'CITY MIX~ AR-8000 OR APPRO~:D EQUAL
POLYMER BONDED AC MAY BE REQUIRED ON SOME ROADWAYS.
WlHE]~E REMAINING PA~T MOTH FROM SAWCUT UNE TO
CUTLER, CURB, OR EDGE O~ PAVEMENT IS [.ESS 1HAN 24-' FOR
A.C. FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR SHALL EXTEND TO GuTrER,
CURB, OR EDG[ ~ PAVEMENT.
AU_ R.O.W. IMPROVIEMENTR AFFECTED IN CONJUNC'~ON
WORK SHALL BE REPt~CED TO CITY STANOAROS.
CITY APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY
WORK COMMENCES.
LONGITUDINAL
-
TRENCH
PAVEMENT
RESTORATION
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
LONGITUDINAL TRENCH PAVEMENT RESTORATION
BY: J.M.
STANDARD 0104
-68-
South Tahoe
Public IJt!iity District
General Manager
I~ichard H. 5oll~rig
Direct:ors
Tom Comt~
James F-. Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Puane Wallace
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www. stpud.us
REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6c
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ed James, Carson Water Subconservancy District
MEETING DATE:
May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Indian Creek Reservoir (ICR)
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Use Spring Runoff to Increase Water Storage
DISCUSSION: Due to the large amount of precipitation that occurred in 2005 and this
year, there may be an opportunity to dived extra water into ICR. This water can only be
used for recreational purposes and cannot be sold for down-stream use.
I request the Board to authorize STPUD staff to dived and monitor flows out of the West
Fork of the Carson River into Indian Creek Reservoir. The diversion and storage of this
water will be done with the oversight of the Federal Water Master for the Carson River.
69
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
Fax Cover Sheet
Richard Solbrig, General Manager
Board Members
Tom Comte
james R. Jone~
Mary Lou Mo~bacher
Duane Wallace
EHc 5chafer
Date: May 1, 2006
To: Board Members
From: . Kathy
Total Number of Pages:
2
Subject: Backup to Agenda Item 6. c re: Ed James' Request to Appear re: ICR
When Ed James made his request to Richard to appear before the Board on May 4, he
mentioned that he had all the approvals and did all the leg work on behalf of the District
getting the necessary permissions, etc. that would allow water to be diverted from the
West Fork of the Carson River into ICR. I called him and asked that he forward all
written documentation, approvals, etc. related to this issue.
This is what he sent.
South Tahoe Public Utility District · 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Phone 530.544.6474 · Facsimile 530.541.0614 · www.stpud.us
CARSON WATER SUBCONSERVANCY DISTRICT
777 East William Street, Suite 110A
Carson City, NV 89701
775/887-7450, fax 775/887-7457
Garry Stone
Federal Water Master
290 S. Arlington Ave.
Reno, NV, 89501
April 28, 2006
Re: Storing Flood Waters in Indian Creek Reservoir
Dear Mr. Stone:
Below is the proposal to store flood waters in Indian Creek Reservoir for 2006.
Starting after May 4, 2006, South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD) will begin
diverting water out of the West Fork of the Carson River to Indian Creek Reservoir.
The amount diverted will depend on the ditch carrying capacity. This water will be
known as Temporary Flood Storage Water. Water will be diverted until the West Fork
goes on regulation or the Federal Water Master orders the water to be shut off. STPUD
will measure the amount of water entedng into Indian Creek Reservoir. If Lahontan
Reservoir does not spill in 2006, the Federal Water Master can request the Temporary
FloOd Storage Water released. If the river has gone on regulation, the water will not be
released until the Fall when the river is no longer being regulated. The amount of water
released will be calculated based on the amount of water that flowed into Indian Creek
Reservoir less evaporation. If Lahontan Reservoir does spill then all the Temporary
Flood Storage Water will remain in Indian Creek Reservoir.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
ED J/ti
Edwin D. James
General Manager
F'"5"..~-,~"/Z-- 7,~7,3 ~,-'
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
FOR APPROVAL
Ma)/4, 2006
Payroll 4/26/06
Total payroll
· BNY Western Trust Company
Cost Containment - health care payments
LaSalle Bank
Hatch & Parent -legal services
Total Vendor EFT
Accounts Payable Checks Sewer Fund
Accounts Payable Checks Water Fund
Accounts Payable Checks Self-funded Ins
Accounts Payable Checks Grant Funds
Total Accounts Payable
Grand Total
311,889.71
311,889.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
142,975.89
7O3,034.72
0.00
0.00
846,010.61
1,15~90~32
Payroll EFTs & Checks
EFT
EFT
EFT
CHK
EFT
EFT
CHK
EFT
EFT
CHK
AFLAC Medical & Dependent Cato
CA Employment Taxes & W/H
Federal Employment Taxes & W/H
CalPERS Contributions
John Hancock Pension Loan Pmts
Groat West Deferred Comp
Stationary Engineers Union Dues
United Way Contributions
Employee Direct Deposits
Employee Paychecks
Adjustments
4126106
266.27
13,600.98
76,829.84
20,340.74
4,116.27
13,402.21
1,952.19
92.00
161,173.25
20,115.96
0.00
311,889.71
-?:I.-
)0 Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/2112006 - 05/04/2006
Vim, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -rrq: C YN ---10 : GL JL- -loo: C STIE-- - -jcb: 360105 #J033-- - -�Og: (1tti09 <1.07 > - -rent i
Default Selection: Check
Very Nan
Stork ID: AP ; Check 'I pes : M4, Lb1, RV, VH
Acoamt # Depart Tent
AFLAC
A W DIRECT
AWWA
A -1 CHEMICAL INC
ALPEN SIERRA 001.1.E CCMPANY
ALSWRY, MARY
ARAMRK UNIFORM SERVICE'S
ARCS, IIANTIEL
10 -00 -2532 ORAL & AIIMINIISIRATTCN
10 -00 -2538 GENERAL & AEMINISIRATICN
20 -05 -6071 E JIRvENT REPAIR.
10 -37 -6250 INECRATICN SYSTEMS
20 -37 -6250 INFORA TICK SYSTEMS
20 -00 -6520
10 -00 -6520
10 -00 -0422
10 -00 -0421
10 -00 -6520
20 -00 -6520
10 -37 -6200
20 -37 -6200
10 -00 -2518
10 -07 -6200
20 -07 -6200
COAL & ALMINISIRATICN
GENERAL & AUvINIIS]PPT CN
GENERAL & ALMINISIRATTCN
COAL & ADNIISIRATICN
Description
INSURANCE EE; SUPPLEMENT
AFLPG Check Total:
SHJP SUPPLIES
DJES
VD" 1 •
1
Check lbtal :
/CERCIFICEI
/CMTIFICATI
dC Total:
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
JANTIORTAL SUPPLIES INVENT R
SHOP SUPPLY INVENICRY Check 'Ibtal :
ORAL & ATMINISTRATICN SUPPLIES
ORAL & AEMINISIRATICN SUPPLIES
CN SY5'IIIvE
GENERAL & ALNIINISIRATICN
LABDRATCRY
ASBESTOS TEM LAB 1 P C: IES, INC 20 -07 -6110 LABORATORY
Check 'Total:
TRRAAVE I' //E ITICN
Check 'lbtal :
LNIFCRIA/RLIS/ MAPLE
:
M'IRAW//EUXATIEELICATICNCN
KNTIORIM
Check Total:
• i •4D•V•
Amount Check # "Ace
835.18
110.00
945.18 00062907 M*7-
134.74
134.74 00062909 Ma
65.00
65.00
130.00 00062910 M7
177.34
177.33
478.36
142.49
975.52 00062911 144
101.66
101.65
203.31 00062912 144.
32.92
32.91
65.83 00062913 144
1,350.47
1,350.47 00062914 144
5.00
5.00
10.00 00062915 Ma
- 400.00
- 400.00 00062658 RV
South 'Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21/2006-05/04/2006 ,
WED, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -req: CARCLM- - -1eg: GL JL- -loc: CI�r1E--- -jc�b: 360105 #J033--- -prcg: 09 <1.0 >-- report id:
Default Selecticn.: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: M'7, HW, RV, VH
Vendor Name A count # DepartnEnt
ASSURANT /1uuls
B B & H BENa-TT EESIGNS
B M H CCCUPATICIT L MEDICINE
BASIC LABORATORY INC.
EENILY ASFGADYNAMICS
1 -HEY INDUSTRIES
BI STATE PROPANE
BRIAN TRAINIM, HARRY
CDW -GCORP
10 -37 -4314 INFQ3ATICN SYSTENB
20 -37 -4314 INFCIWATICN SYSIENS
10 -00 -2539 GENERAL & ALM NIS RATTCN
20 -22 -4405 BUYANFTBCURCES DIRECICR
10 -22 -4405 HLM'N RCS
10 -37 -6075 INECRNATICN SYSTEMS
20 -37 -6075 INR3WA 'ION SYSTEMS
10 -07 -6075 LABCRATCRY
20 -07 -6075 LABORATORY
10 -07 -6110
10 -06 -6652
10 -00 -0415
10 -00 -0416
20 -00 -6360
20 -01 -6200
LABORATORY
OPERATICNS
GaTERAL
GENERAL & AIIMINISIRAATICN
COAL & AEMINISIRATICN
INEERSRCIND REPAIR
10 -39 -4820 FINANCE
20 -39 -4820 FTNANCE
Description
LCIZ TERM DISABILITY, LrIICN
LGI3 TERM DISABILITY, INICN
LEM TERM DISP,BILTIY UNION
Cheat Tbtal:
CCNIRACILAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE'S
Check Tbtal:
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFELY
SAFETY
De •
a• 12
Eft • 2
RENT PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
/FHYSICkLS
Check Tbtal:
Check Tbtal:
BICEELID DISPCSAL CCSIS
Check Tbtal:
DIESEL INVE
Check Tbtal:
PROPANE
Check Tbtal:
TRAVEG/MMIIMS/ECUJCATICN
Check Tbtal:
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
An -cunt Check # 'Type
7.51
7.51
1,428.88
1,443.90 00062916 MW
624.50
624.50
1,249.00 00062917 NW
83.71
83.71
131.21
131.21
429.84 00062918 MAI
402.00
402.00 00062919 NW
3,080.16
3,080.16 00062920 NW
6,963.95
7,324.99
14,288.94 00062921 NW
55.38
55.38 00062922 MW
350.00
350.00 00062923 MAT
33.33
33.31
66.64 00062924 M'
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAY M ENT O F C L A I M S R E P O R T 04/542006-N04/2006 CE 3
MD, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM --rag: ( ffI-- -1er3: GL JL - -loc: C7STIE-- - -jcb: 360105 #3.033 - -- -wog: 09 <1.07 >-- report Id:
DefPn ilt Selectiaz: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,HW,RV,VH
Vendor Narre Accra nt # Deuertnent
CWEA
10 -04 -6250 HEAVY NAINDINANZE
CALIF WATER RESCURCES CIRL ED 10 -06 -6250 MME'S C S
CAROLLO ENGINEERS 10 -29 -8238 ENS
20 -29 -7055 EN IN R:1Z
CHERNAGO, BRIAN 10 -07 -6200 LABS 3IRY
20 -07 -6200 LABORNTORY
aNIE, 'IHCMAS
CAS
(S<TT INSURANCE, J & C
CREEK ENVJMNENIAL TARS
10 -19 -6200 ECIARD OF DDS
20 -19 -6200 BOARD OF DIRECIURS
20 -22 -4405 HIM AN RESCIRCES DIRECIU
10 -22 -4405 }DM RESCURCES
10 -29 -6250 EL3INEE2IlNU
20 -29 -6250 EN
20 -07 -6110 LABS
CRCESPOINIE PAR RS LLC 20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INFORNATTCN
10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INETTCN
Descripticn
L SS/N BPS /CERTIFTC ATI
Check 'Lbta1:
I M S PS /C 1 rIFTC4TI
E ES PSADMITICATI
Clerk 'Ibta1:
Z =0.'1 1
SNP SIN MY RENER MIN
Cock 'Ibtal :
TRAW//CN
Check 'Ibta1:
TRA 1�S/ TCN
TRA Check Tbbt
Ch ta1:
C:NIRACIUAL SERVICES
CCNIRACIUAL SERVICES
Ck Tbtal:
E PS /CERTIFTC ATI
�! S'EIIPS /C TIFICATI
Check Tbtal:
NENTICRILZ
Check Tbta1:
CCNIRACILAL
CCNIRALTUAL SERVI�
Check Tbtal:
Pntunt (lack # Type
200.00
200.00 00062925 MW
530.00
170.00
700.00 00062926 M7
2,508.00
8,127.50
10,635.50 00062927 M4
51.28
51.28
102.56 00062928 MW
13.35
13.35
26.70 00062929 MW
30.80
30.80
61.60 00062930 MN
156.50
156.50
313.00 00062931 Ma
1,985.00
1,985.00 00062932 MI
2,750.00
2,750.00
5,500.00 00062933 MAI
South Tahce P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21/2006-05/04/2006 , a 4
WED, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -1eq: C�,ROLrN -- -leg: GL JL- -lo : CNSIIE-- - -dab: 360105 #J033--- -grog: 09 <1.07 > - -art id:
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW, HW, RV, VH
Vend= Narre Aooamt # DepartnEnt
DATW SERVICES CQZP
EEL NARKEI'IM L P
DIAZ, ANILNIO I
DICK'S FULLER -
DICNEK CQZP
E N S RESU RA S INC
E -FI T ,TA'IE .QCRP
EL DCRADO CCUNIY
20 -22 -6079 RUTIN RESOURCES DIRECIU
10 -22 -6079 MAW R
10 -37 -4840 II RCN SYSIEAS
20 -37 -4840 ICF'PiTICN SYST AS
10 -01 -6200 IIEUND REPAIR.
10 -04 -6051 HEAVY MINIENANCE
20 -07 -4760 LABOIZAT:R(
10 -07 -4760 LABORATORY
10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INIFCM0ATICN
20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT 1NPO MATICN
10 -37 -4840 INFOWATICITSYS1EMS
20 -37 -4840 INRIMTICNSTSIEMS
20 -01 -6650 LEEERGROUND REPAIR
REMURCES AS90 10 -07 -4760 LAECRATORY
20 -07 -4760 LABORATORY
ENVIRCNMENIAL SYSTEMS RBI 10 -28 -6051 DI IVtND VALLEY RANCH
Description
SAFELY PR: CRAMS
SAFETY PROGRAMS
Check Tbtal:
ETSTRICTCOMMINZEUPPLIES
DISTRICTOaMPUMRSUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
TRAY VE UMICN
Check Tbta1:
PUMP STAZZQNS
Check Tbtal:
LAB:RAT:RC SUPPLIES
LAB:RAICRY SUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
CCNIRACIU L SERVICES
CQNIRPcR L SERVICi�Sk Tbtal:
DISIRICT CCMRJIER SUPPLIES
DISIRICT C / UTFR SUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
OPERATIM PERMITS
Check Tbtal:
LABORATORY SUPPLIES
LABORATORY SUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
PUT SIATIQM
Amt Check # Type
477.75
477.75
955.50 00062934 NW
2,150.81
2,150.85.
4,301.66 00062935 NW
116.59
116.59 00062936 M4
39.72
39.72 00062937 M'
580.16
562.99
1,143.15 00062938 M4
3,343.07
6,686.15 00062939 MAI
195.32
195.36
390.68 00062940 Md
136.00
136.00 00062941 NW
57.10
28.00
85.10 00062942 NW
442.96
S uth Tat-re P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT O F CLAIMS R E P O R T 04/21/2006-05/04/2006 a� ea�5
WED, .APR. 26, 2006, 10:00 AM -- : CAROL N -- -leg: GL 3L--loc: � -- - -jcb: 360105 #J033 - - -Wig• 09 <1.07 >- -fit id: C RE E
Iefault Selecticaz: Check Stack ID: AP ; Check Types: NW, i4W, RV, VH
Vend= Nane Accc nt # Department
FAMILY ENTER RISES
FECEX FREIGHT WEST
FISHER RI3SEARCH LAB INC
ME, WILLIAM
G C S SERVICE INC
G FOA
G F S CHEMICAL
G L I IINIERNAT'ICNAL - HACH OD
10 -27 -6620
20 -27 -6620
10 -00 -4810
20 -00 -4810
20 -07 -4760
10 -07 -4760
10 -37 -6200
20 -37 -6200
DISTRICT INECEMICN
DISTRICT INTECEMITCN
GENERAL Sc ALM NISIRATICN
GENERAL & ALMINISIRATICN
IB
ICAT
MECIRM4TICN SYSTEMS
INFORMUICN SYSIEIE
10 -07 -6025 LABCPA1U Y
20 -07 -6025 LAS
10 -39 -4830 FINANCE
20 -39 -4830 FINANCE
10 -07 -4760
20 -07 -4760
10 -07 -4760
20 -07 -4760
IABZRATOFff
LAY B RAT
LABMICRY
LAB:RAI -MY
Descripticn
Check Ibtal:
RELIC RELATIONS EXPENSE
RELIC RECA'ITCLIS MIME
'Ibtal:
Check Check Ibtal:
LAI:MA SUPPLIES
IABCIRATCRY SUPPLIES
Check 'Ibtal :
ZRP,
LLP,BC�2ERYRy E
Check 'Ibtal:
SUESCRIPTICNS
S«9CRIPITCINS DOME Check Ibtal:
LABCRATORY SUPPLIES
LABMATCRY SUPPLIES
Check Zbtal:
IABCRATCRY SUPPLIES
LAB IRATORY SUPPLIES Check Total :
Arrant Check # Type
442.96 00062943 NW
207.50
207.50
415.00 00062944 NW
59.07
59.07
118.14 00062945 NW
464.32
390.95
855.27 00062946 NW
18.00
18.00
36.00 00062947 M1
127.00
117.98
244.98 00062948 NW
27.50
27.50
55.00 00062949 MAI
66.97
32.85
99.82 00062950 NW
163.63
143:63
307.26 00062951 NW
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21 2006 - 05/04/2006
WED, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM -- : CAROUN- - -1eg: GL 3L - -loc: CNSIaE - -- -jab: 360105 4J033 - - - -p og: 09 <1.07 > - -sort id:
Default Selection: Check Stack ID: AP ; Check Types: MW, HW, RV, VH
Vencbr Name Account # LppartmEnt
COAL DATA SPECIALIST'S
GRAIN3ER. INC, W. W.
GRAY, SANDY S
GROVE MAUS'EN =UM=
HASL R FIIEAL SERVICES TT r
IICC i SEIM 13U.SINESS SYSTEMS
INFO= SCREEN= SERVICES
=MATE SAFETY & SUPPLY
J &L PRO KLEENINC
10 -03 -6051 ELECTRICAL SFDP
10 -00 -0425 CAL & ALMINISIRATICN
20 -38 -6200
10 -38 -6200
10 -02 -8631
20 -29 -8401
10 -38 -5020
20 -38 -5020
20 -21 -6030
10 -21 -6030
10 -22 -6670
20 -22 -6670
10 -00 -0421
10 -00 -0425
10 -39 -6074
20 -39 -6074
CISICNER SERVICE
PIMPS
End NEERfl
WSSIcIVER SERVICE
AIIMIDNISIPATICN
ALNBNISIRATTCN
HUNAN RE
HLNAN RESC1RCES DIRECICR
ORAL & A MI ISIRATICN
GENERAL & ALM NISIRATICN
FINANCE FINANCE
Description
RNNP STAI'IQ S
Check Ibta1:
SAFETY SUPPLIES � .
1171 " Check Zb -il
UPPER TRKE PS UPGRADE
C EIt1 ER SERVICE C ENIER
Check Tbta1:
CCNIRACTS
SERVICE
Check Thal:
PERSONNEL EXPENSE
PERSONNEL EXPENSE
Check Total :
SHOP SUPPLY INVENTORY
SAFETY SURUES INVENTORY
Check Total:
JANITORIAL SERVICES
Check Total:
Amtxmt Check # 'Type
75.00
75.00 00062952 M
122.65
122.65 00062953 M7
32.00
32.00
64.00 00062954 MW
846.00
4,124.00
4,970.00 00062955 !W
122.57
122.57
245.14 00062956 MW
148.40
148.41
296.81 00062957 MW
54.40
54.40
108.80 00062958 MW
345.74
891.71
1,237.45 00062959 MW
1,473.50
1,473.50
2,947.00 00062960 MW
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21/2006-05/04/2006 7
WED, AM. 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -1 : C .SST -- -leg: GL JL- -lo : C NST1E - -- -dab: 360105 #J033-- - -pmg: CK509 <1.07 > - -repart id: C
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: MV, I-A RV, VH
Verr2or Nacre Acaxnt # Departrrent
JOB'S PEAK PRIMARY @RE
20 -01 -6075
10 -02 -6075
20 -02 -6075
10 -04 -6075
10 -06 -6075
10 -07 -6075
20 -07 -6075
�
REPAIR
PLIAPS
HEAVY MAINIENANCE
OPERATICIZ
IA• ECRATCRY
KENNEDY /3B iF S CONSULTANTS INC 10 -29 -8572 E 13
KL INE CD, SIEVEN L
LAKESIDE NAPA
10 -37 -6075 INECEMATICN SYSTEMS
20 -37 -6075 IlTTCN SYSIFNS
10 -04 -6075 HEAVY MAINTENANCE
10 -05 -6071
10 -07 -4790
20 -07 -4790
20 -05 -6071
LIVE WIRE MEDIA PARTNERS 20 -27 -6660
M S C INDUSIRIAL SUPPLY OD 10 -04 -6071
10 -04 -6051
M X LOGIC INC
20 -37 -4405
10 -37 -4405
a• 1• ;�
REPAIR
LABMATCRY
ELUIPVENT REPAIR
DISIRICT IIICN
• V NAINIEINANZE
IN• FORMATICN SYSIE S
Description
SAFETY
SAFETY
SAFELY
SAFEIY
SAFELY
SAFELY
• 18
• ,a
• IC
PIPELINE,
SAFEIY
SAFELY
P
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHCALS
SIC
/PHYSICALS
Check Tbta1:
Check Ibtal:
z• • a PHYSICALS
m• PHYSICALS
mei • ID /PHYSICALS
Check Tbtal:
SHOP SUPPLIES
C SUPPLIES
OIHER SUPPLIES
alDP SUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
ViDiTFR CCNSERVATTCN EKPENSE
Check Tbtal:
SRDP SUPPLIES
POMP SMICNS
Check Tbtal:
CC7NIRAGTLIAL SERVICES
SERVIICIC Tbtal:
Anna nt C he ck # Type
105.00
52.50
52.50
210.00
105.00
52.50
52.50
630.00 00062998 NW
7,236.15
7,236.15 00062961 NW
87.00
87.00
235.00
409.00 00062962 M4
33.81
33.81
33.81
33.82
135.25 00062963 M4
336.00
336.00 00062964 MW
665.67
14.32
679.99 00062965 NW
85.67
85.68
171.35 00062966 Mi
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21/2006-05/04/2006 CKPac� 8
WED, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -req: CPJL2T-- - -1eg: GL Q�151'1E-- - -jdb: 360105 #J033---- prang: 09 <1.0 >-- report id: REE tC
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,IW,RV,VH
Vend= Nacre Acc c nt # repertuent
MDIRSHALL, REK B
M2 DCNALD, MICHELE
My FARLANE, RIICtIak
ND N S11 R CARR SUPPLY CD
NC IVR, PHIL
MENIDO A, MkTII-3EW
MJ.ICR INTRIMTICN SYSIEIVE
Orr10E MAX - A EOISE OD.
P D M SIEEL
POWERS, TERENCE H
10 -38 -6200 QE'ICNER SERVICE
20 -38 -6200 CUSTOMER SERVICE
10 -37 -6200 1NFORMATICNSYSTEMS
20 -37 -6200 INPORANTICN SYM S
10 -39 -6200 FINANCE
20 -39 -6200 FINANCE
20 -02 -6071 PUMPS
10 -02 -6071 PUMPS
20 -01 -6200 INEERGROUND REPAIR
10 -29 -6200 ENGIl P]N3
20 -29 -6200 ENGINEERMI3
10 -05 -6071 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
10 -21 -4820 PENENISTRATIM
20 -21 -4820 ALNENIS RATTCN
10 -04 -6071 HEAVY M NIE
10 -07 -6200 LABORATORY
Descripticn
Check Total:
'IRA Total:
SEDP SUPPLIES
0-DP SUPPLIES
RCN
CN
Check Total:
Check Total:
TRAUFL/MEET N /E TAITCN
Check Total:
TRAM /ID CN
Crack Total:
SE-DP SUPPLIES
Check Total:
OFFTCE SUPPLIES
OFFTCE SUPPLIES Check Total:
SEDP SUPPLIES
Check Total:
TRAVEL/MEF TIN S/E ltATTCN
Amcumt Check # Type
32.00
32.00
64.00 00062967 M'
14.00
14.00
28.00 00062968 NW
80.00
80.00
160.00 00062969 NW
813.10
508.56
1,321.66 00062972 NW
126.00
126.00 00062973 MTV
81.09
81.09
162.18 00062974 NW
377.13
377.13 00062975 WI
146.25
29.82
176.07 00062976 NW
123.22
123.22 00062977 Ma
129.16
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21/2006-05/04/2006
YID, APR. 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -rag: CAR . N---1eg: C4, JL - -1cC: C Si n-- - -jcb: 360105 143033--- -pttg: OK509 <1.07 > - -repert id:
Default Selecticn: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Tines: NW,BW,RV,VH
Vendor Nacre A mrit # repartirent
pfo LEE
RADIO SEAM
INC 20 -29 -8401 EN INEE fl 3
S BC 20 -00 -6320 ORAL & AIIMENTISIRAT'ICN
10 -00 -6320 COAL & ALM NISIRATICN
20 -07 -6200 LABORATORY
10 -21 -6621 ALNEINISIRATICN
20 -21 -6621 Atrv1INIS RATION
10 -01 -6012 UNDERMINE) REPAIR
SBC /MCI
10 -00 -6310
20 -00 -6310
10 -02 -6310
20 -02 -6310
10 -06 -6310
10 -37 -6310
20 -37 -6310
10 -39 -6310
20 -39 -6310
COAL & AI NIINISIRATICN
GENERAL & PEDENISIRATICN
PUMPS
PUMPS
O RCN SYSTEMS
INFOR\RTICNI SYSTEMS
FINANCE
FINANCE
SIETvPJ E EDGY & AUIC TICK 10 -02 -8631 PUMPS
SIERRA CHEMICAL CD
10 -06 -4755 OPERATIONS
Descripticn
TRA /EU]CTICN
Check Tbtal:
INCENTIVE & R13:031\IITICN PRZR
INCENTIVE & RIMOGNI .'ICN PR SR.
Check Tbtal:
MILE ETXIAMENT Tbtal:
Check CLEIU E RR SERVICE CENTER
Check Tbtal:
SIGI\AL CHARGES Cif
Check Tbtal.:
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
E
TELEPHONE
NE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
Check Ibtal:
UPPER TRIG PS UPGRADE
Check Tbtal:
HYPOMICRTIE
Check Tbtal.:
a
At c n t Check # 1e
129.14
258.30 00062978 NW
00062979 M✓1
32.31
32.31 00062980 MW
00062981 NW
00062908 NW
86.41
86.41
172.82
526,038.30
526,038.30
32.02
96.06
128.08
7.18
7.17
20.66
20.66
21.54
82.19
82.18
7.03
7.03
255.64
2,172.91
2,172.91
4,368.39
4,368.39
00062982 NW
00062983 MTV
00062984 NW
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 04/21/2006-0504/2006 P 1100
WED, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -req: C LYDT -- -lei: GL JL - -loo: CNSI1 - -- -job: 360105 #J033--- -prog: 09 <1.07 >-- report id:
befau1 t Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: Mni, HW, RV, VH
Vendor Narre Account # DepartmEnt
SIERRA
SIERRA FC CAHI r , LABO ATORY
SIERRA NEVAt 7 C IASSIF ID2S
SIERRA PACIFIC PCWER
SIMS PCNP VALUE cD INc
SMITH DESIGN CtJP
SMITH, GREG
SOUIHIAEST C14S
SIANIB2 CCNSULTIEZ Il 2
TRPA
TRPA
20 -07 -6110 LAB32 " cRY
20 -07 -6110 LAB AICEU
10 -22 -4930 %iNAN RESOURCES
20 -22 -4930 MAW RESaIRCES DIRECICR
10 -00 -6330 CAL Sc AEMINISIRATTCN
20 -00 -6330 CORAL & AEMENISTRATICN
10 -02 -7514 RMPS
20 -29 -8401 E NEERIM
10 -06 -6250 OPERATTCNS
10 -00 -6350 GENERAL & ALMENISIRATICN
20 -00 -6350 GENERAL & AEMENISTRATICN
20 -29 -8401 ENSINEERIM
20 -29 -7047 ENGINEERIM
20 -00 -1510 COAL & P v NISIRATICN
Descripticn
NENTIORING
(deck Tbtal:
NENIIC IM
Check Tbtal:
AIS� N7IT�
Check Tbtal:
Check 'Total:
IDS T E , TR MK PS PCNP #2
Check Tbtal:
QE'ILNER SERVICE CENIFR
Check Tbtal:
CUES BPS /CERIZFICATI
Check 'Total:
NATURAL C76
NATURAL CgiS
Check Tbtal:
C EICMER SERVICE CENIER
Check Total:
LAND, PAYVIEW WELL
Check Ibtal:
IRPA SEEIJR IY DEPOSIT
Amxuit Check # Type
646.00
646.00 00062985 M4
293.00
293.00 00062986 Mn1
409.74
409.74
819.48 00062987 M'
73,733.64
22,996.55
96,730.19 00062988 NW
4,435.08
4,435.08 00062989 MV
13,839.07
13,839.07 00062990 NW
90.00
90.00 00062991 MAT
197.82
184.45
382.27 00062992 NW
2,930.15
2,930.15 00062993 NW
3,720.00
3,720.00 00062905 NW
40,000.00
V� AP Tahoe , P.U.D. 10 :00 PM --re06 C YPAYMENT 1:C 1JL-- o QNsCLAIMS i — jab 360105 #J033-- - -pnmg 04/21/2006-05/04/2006
C E509061.07 > --r r rt id: CKRECSPC
Default Selecticn: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: Ma, BW, RV, VH
Ve ±u Naire Acoa_mt # DEpartmEnt
TRPA
TAPLE Filth GCNIRCL
MICE MMNIAIN NEM
THER D EUECIICN map
'IREE:7ITCH, =RES L
USARIREOM
USBAl�<:
VWRTICN
20 -29 -7049 ENGINSDRUS
20 -29 -8574
End
10 -02 -6075 FIVES
20 -02 -6075 MAPS
20 -27 -6660
10 -07 -6025
20 -07 -6025
10 -07 -6200
20 -07 -6200
10 -01 -6055
20 -29 -8401
20 -07 -4760
10 -07 -4760
DISTRICT INPORtilATICN
LATKPIATCRY
IABCPATC Y
LA LABCRATCRY
t[ ID REPAIR
LAABCRAICRY
Descripticn
Check 'Ibtal :
WATERLINE, BAYVIEW
Check Tbtal:
Vendor Tbtal:
WELL, BAYVIEW
SAFETY
SAFETY
2• 1•
2• 1• 2
Check 'Ibtal :
PHYSICALS
glaidYStICALS
TIER C ISERVATICN EXPENSE
Check Tbtal:
macIAECM
Check Tbtal:
TRAaCN
Check Tbtal:
nmTRATIC & INFILW k
Check Tbtal:
QSIt1 ER SERVICE C E I ER.
Check Tbtal:
IAEMATCRY SUPPLIES
Check Tbtal:
Iitwnt Check # Type
40,000.00 00062906 Ma
1,094.00
1,094.00 00062994 NW
44,814.00
56.34
56.34 00062995 NW
525.19
525.18
1,050.37 00062996 NW
250.00
250.00 00062997 NW
99.48
84.47
183.95 00062999 Mg
5.00
5.00
10.00 00063000 Mg
2,059.22
2,059.22 00063001 MA
58,448.70
58,448.70 00063002 Ma
30.73
24.18
54.91 00063003 Ma
South Tahoe P.U.D. 04/26/06 PAYMENT O F CLAIMS R E P O R T 04/21/2006- 05/04/2006 id:
WED, APR 26, 2006, 10:00 AM - -reg: C �YN -- -- leg: GL 3L- -loc: CNSi E - -- -fob: 360105 #J033- - - -fig: 09 <1.07 > --
Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW,HW,RV,VH
Vencbr Nacre Aocc nt # Departrrent
VERIZIN
WALLACE, P MANE
WEIXO INC
6T NEVALA SUPPLY
Y MEDICAL INC
10 -28 -6310 DID VALLEY RANCH
20 -19 -6200 B FD OF DIRECICRS
10 -02 -8631 AMPS
20 -03 -6050 ELECTRICAL SDP
20 -38 -6045
20 -01 -6052
10 -01 -6075
20 -01 -6075
10 -02 -6075
20 -02 -6075
10 -04 -6075
10 -05 -6075
20 -05 -6075
10 -06 -6075
10 -07 -6075
20 -07 -6075
10 -39 -6075
20 -39 -6075
CUSICNER L[ REPS
alCERSRaND REPAIR
UNCERGRCCND REPAIR
AMPS
REPS
HEAVYFNE
01 • 10 REPAIR. CNS
0• LA RAac1
LABCRATCRY
FTNANCE
FINANCE
]scriptim
=ENE
Check Tbtal :
TRAVEL/ ETINGS /ED CAT'ICN
Check Tbtal:
UPPER TRKE PS UPGRADE
ViE T S
Check Tbtal:
WATER MEiIFRS
PIPE, ODVERS, & FAUDI ES
Check Tbtal :
SAFELY
SAFETY
SA Y
SAFE
SAFELY DUTI
SAFELY DWI
SAFETY
SAFELY
SAFETY
SAFETY
•
/PHYSICALS
EN
A�NI` /PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSCALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSICALS
PHYSCALS
/HHYSION S
Check Total:
Grand Tbtal:
Ar►umt Check # Type
185.05
185.05 00063004 NW
62.30
62.30 00063005 rq
1,380.96
67.82
1,448.78 00063006 NW
464.39
7.17
471.56 00063007 NW
14.66
14.65
19.10
19.09
48.86
18.86
18.85
135.78
15.60
15.59
32.65
32.65
386.34 00063008 NW
846,010.61
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. SolbHg
OJ?eccors
Tom ¢omt~
James R. Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Duan~ Wallac~
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474, Fax 530 541-0614, www. Stpud. us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14a
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Rhonda McFarlane, Chief Financial Officer
Richard Solbrig, General Manager
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Real Estate Negotiations
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct negotiators.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the California Government Code, Closed
Session may be held to discuss real estate negotiations.
Negotiating Parties: Board Ad Hoc Committee, General Manager,
Assistant General Manager/Engineer,
Chief Financial Officer,
Under Negotiation: Terms and Price
Property Identification: Lukins Water Company, 2031 West Way,
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Water
-85-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
IRichard H. Solbrig
Directors
"rom Comte
James P~ Jones
Ma~ Lou Mosl~acher
Duane Wallace
Eric $chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474, Fax 530 541-0614, wwW. stpud, us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14b
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
Board of Directors
RiChard H. Solbrig, General Manager
May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing
litigation: Beth Jeff, Kendall Pearce, and Pearce Family Trust dated 1-20-88 vs. South
Tahoe Public Utility District, Cox & Cox Construction, Inc., a California Corporation,
Nimbus Engineers, a Nevada Corporation and Does 1-100, inclusive, Civil Action No.
PC 20050567, Superior Court, County of El Dorado, State of California.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GE.ER^, M^.^GER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES '~YY'~-.-
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
-8?-
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
Richard H. $olbdg
Directors
Tom Com~
James I~ Jones
Mary Lou Mosbache~
Puane Wallace
EHc 9chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474, Fax 530 541-0614, www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14c
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager
Gary Kvistad, Legal Counsel
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing
litigation: STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land in Alpine County, California; United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento Division, Case No. CIV S-02-
0238 MCE JFM.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
South Tahoe
PUbliC Utility l istrict
General Manager
Richard H. $olbrig
D~recr. ors
Tom Comte
James P~ Jones
Mary Lou Mosbacher
Puane Wallace
Eric 5chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474, Fax 530 541-0614, www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14d
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing
litigation: Meyers Landfill Site - United States of America vs. El Dorado County and City
of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No. S-01-1520 LKK
GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES /~1[ .d~
OFFICER: YES ~'~'~
CHIEF
FINANCIAL
NO
NO
CATEGORY: Sewer
-91'
South Tahoe
Public Utility District
General Manager
I~ichard H. Solbrig
Tom Comt~
James R. Jones
Mary Lou Mosl~acher
Duane Wallace
Eric ~chafer
1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe · CA 96150-7401
Phone 530 544-6474 · Fax 530 541-0614 · www. stpud.us
BOARD AGENDA ITEM 14e
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager,
Paul Sciuto, Assistant General Manager/Engineer
MEETING DATE: May 4, 2006
ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (two cases)
REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct legal counsel.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) of the California Government Code,
Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding anticipation of
litigation.
SCHEDULE:
COSTS:
ACCOUNT NO:
BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING:
ATTACHMENTS:
CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION:
GENERAL MANAGER: YES /~.~ NO
CHIEF FINANCIAL oFFICER: YES '~)~f~c.. NO
CATEGORY:
-93-