The URL can be used to link to this page

AP 06-01-06 SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT "Basic Services for a Complex World" REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA Thursday, June 1, 2006 2:00 P.M. District Office 1275 Meadow Crest Drive, South Lake Tahoe, California Richard Solbrii' General ~anai~r Eric W. Schafer, President " .' , BOARD MEMBERS , ~~ul",~Ciuto, Assist~ntM~~a~e~..... Duane Wallace. Vice President James R. Jones. Director ..,.....,... ,..,. "... -_...,....,,,,. '^ .~ary.~~~..~()sbac~E!r. [>irE!~t(?r ..... Tom Cornte. Director ... .. .. ". ....., . ". .. . ..', 1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (Short non-agenda items that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the District. Five-minute limit. No action will be taken.) 3. CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA OR CONSENT CALENDAR 4. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR (Any item can be discussed and considered separately upon request.) 5. CONSENT ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR ACTION I DISCUSSION 6. PRESENTATIONS a. Government Finance Officers Association Award of Excellence in Financial Reporting for Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2005 7. ITEMS FOR BOARD ACTION REQUESTED BOARD ACTION a. 716 Clement Street, APN: 23-502-43 Pg.49 (Randy Curtis) Approve Sewer Main Extension at District's Cost REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - JUNE 1, 2006 PAGE-2 b. Payment of Claims Pg.53 Approve Payment in the Amount of $3,245,455.48 8. BOARD MEMBER STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) a. Water & Wastewater Operations Committee (Jones / Comte) b. Finance Committee (Wallace / Schafer) c. Executive Committee (Schafer / Wallace) d. Planning Committee (Mosbacher / Schafer) 9. BOARD MEMBER AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) a. Building Ad Hoc Committee (Mosbacher / Jones) b. Indian Creek Reservoir Water Storage Ad Hoc Committee (Mosbacher / Jones) 10. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) 11. EL DORADO COUNTY WATER AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE REPORT (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) 12. GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS (Discussion may be held on these items; however, no action will be taken) a. Fire Protection Requirements b. CTC (California Tahoe Conservancy) MOU re: Utility Relocation Grant Funding for Erosion Control Projects 13. STAFF REPORTS (Discussions may take place; however, no action will be taken) 14. NOTICE OF PAST AND FUTURE MEETINGS I EVENTS Past Meetinas I Events OS/24/06 - EI Dorado County Water Agency Regular Board Meeting OS/24/06 - Building Ad Hoc Committee Meeting 05/30/06 - Operations Committee Meeting Future Meetinas I Events 06/02/06 - 11 :00 a.m. - EI Dorado County Water Purveyors Meeting in Pollock Pines 06/06/06 - 9:00 a.m. - Alpine County Supervisors Regular Board Meeting in Markleeville 06/12/06 - 4:00 p.m. - Operations Committee Meeting 06/15/06 - 2:00 p.m. - STPUD Regular Board Meeting at District Office 06/16/06 - 9:30 a.m. - Tahoe Interagency Executives Meeting at Kings Beach 15. CLOSED SESSION a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8/Real Estate Negotiations Pg.67 Negotiating Parties: Board Ad Hoc Committee, General Manager, Assistant General Manager/Engineer, Chief Financial Officer Under Negotiation: Terms and Price Property Identification: Lukins Water Company, 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA - JUNE 1, 2006 PAGE-3 b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel- Pg.69 Existing Litigation: Beth Jett, Kendall Pearce, and Pearce Family Trust dated 1-20-88 vs. South Lake Tahoe Public Utility District, Cox & Cox Construction, Inc., a California Corporation, Nimbus Engineers, a Nevada Corporation and Does 1-100, Inclusive, Civil Action No. PC 20050567, Superior Court, County of EI Dorado, State of California. c. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel- Pg.71 Existing Litigation: STPUD vs. ARCO, et aI., San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. 999128 d.. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel- Pg.73 Existing Litigation: STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land in Alpine County, California; et aI., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento Division, Case No. CIV S-02-0238 MCE JFM e. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)/Conference with Legal Counsel- Pg.75 Existing Litigation re: Meyers Landfill Site: United States of America vs. EI Dorado . County and City of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No. S-01-1520 LKK GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Ca. f. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)/Conference with Legal Counsel- Pg. 77 Anticipated Litigation (Two Cases) g. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a)/Conference with Labor Pg. 79 Negotiators: Agency Negotiators: Richard Sol brig/General Manager, Rhonda McFarlane/Chief Financial Officer, Ross Johnson/Plant Operations Manager, Directors Wallace and Comte/Union Negotiations Ad Hoc Committee Employee Organizations: International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local 39; Agency/Employee Health Care Options Subcommittee 16. ACTION I REPORT ON ITEMS DISCUSSED DURING CLOSED SESSION 17. ADJOURNMENT (To the next regular meeting, June 15,2006,2:00 p.m.) The South Tahoe Public Utility District Board of Directors regularly meets the first and third Thursday of each month. A complete agenda packet, including all backup information is available for review at the meeting and at the District office during the hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Items on this agenda are numbered for identification purposes only and will not necessarily be considered in the order in which they appear on the agenda. Designated times are for particular items only. Public Hearings will not be called to order prior to the time specified. Public participation is encouraged. Public comments on items appearing on the agenda will be taken at the same time the agenda items are heard; comments should be brief and directed to the specifics of the item being considered. Comments on items not on the agenda can be heard during "Comments from the Audience;" however, action cannot be taken on items not on the agenda. Please provide the Clerk of the Board with a copy of all written material presented at the meeting. The meeting location is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate participation of the disabled in all of the District's public meetings. If particular accommodations for the disabled are needed (Le., disability-related aids, or other services), please contact the Clerk of the Board at 530.544.6474, extension 6203, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR JUNE 1,2006 ITEMS REQUESTED ACTION a. Ottawa Street Paving Pg. 1 (Randy Curtis) b. Purchase of Network Equipment for New Pg. 3 Buildings (Bill Frye, Debbie Henderson) c. Annual Software Support Costs for Utility Billing Pg. 5 Software (Carol Swain) d. Sewer Enterprise 2006-07 Appropriations Subject Pg.15 to Limitation (Debbie Henderson) e. Pg.21 Customer Service, Operations and Laboratory Facility (Jim Hoggatt) f. Pg.29 Arsenic Treatment Study (Ivo Bergsohn) Authorize Staff to Advertise for Bids to Pave 20,000 sq. feet of Ottawa Street Authorize Purchase of Budgeted Network Equipment in an Amount Not to Exceed $18,063 (Including Tax) Approve Payment to Springbrook Software, Inc., for Software Support in the Amount of $16,031.40 Adopt Resolution No. 2811-06 Setting the Limitation on Appropria- tions for Fiscal Year 2006-07 Approve Task Order to Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers in the Amount of $18,550 to Provide a Hazardous Materials Abatement Survey of the Existing Administration Building Approve Proposal from Carollo Engineers in the Amount of $116,180.00 to Complete Phase II of the Arsenic Treatment Study for the Arrowhead Well No.3 CONSENT CALENDAR - JUNE 1, 2006 PAGE-2 g. Geo-Referencing Survey - Phase III Pg.39 (Ivo Bergsohn) Approve Task Order No. 1-A Between the District and Consultant (Auerbach Engineering Corporation), Thereby Adding $8,040.00 to the Total for Purchase Order No. P16743 h. South Upper Truckee Well No.3 Corrosion Pg. 45 Control Study (Ivo Bergsohn) Approve Proposal from Kennedy/ Jenks Consultants to Complete Phase II of the South Upper Truckee Well NO.3 Corrosion Control Study in an Amount Not to Exceed $90,000 (Estimated) i. Pg.47 Public Meeting Minutes: May 4, 2006 (Kathy Sharp) Approve Minutes South Tahoe Public Utility District. 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Phone 530.544.6474. Facsimile 530.541.0614 · www.stpud.us General Manag~r Richard H. 5olt>rifl South Tahoe . Public Utility District Directors Tom Cornu Jame5 R. Jones Mary Lou M05t>acher Duane Wal~ce Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe .eA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530541-0614' www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 a. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Randy Curtis Manager of Field Operations MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Ottawa Street Paving REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize staff to advertise for bids to pave 20,000 sq. feet of Ottawa Street. DISCUSSION: Ottawa Street was severely damaged due to a break in a 4" water main. The street was heavily undermined and damaged along a 100+ foot section on Lower Ottawa near Apache. A temporary patch (concrete slurry) was installed this past winter, which will have to be ground down and re-paved. . SCHEDULE: As soon as possible COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: 2001~043 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: None CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YESAL NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: . YES~ NO CATEGORY: Water -1- General ManaGer Richard H. Solbrltl . South .Tahoe . Public .UtilityDistrict DiiOCtorS Tom Comu James R. Jones Mar:y Lou Mo5bacher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe .CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www;StpUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 b. TO: FROM: Board of Directors Bill Frye, PC/Network Systems Administrator Debbie Henderson, Accounting Manager MEETING DATE: June 1,2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Purchase of network equipment for new buildings/Capital Outlay Account Rollover REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Authorize purchase of budgeted network equipment in an amount not to exceed $18,063 (including tax). Authorize staff to amend the 2005/06 budget to direct rollover capital funds budgeted in 2004/05 fiscal year to the ~005/06 fiscal year. DISCUSSION: Network Equipment will be purchased from a vendor using the federal Government Services Administration (GSA) contract pricing. Staff finds this contract pricing to be very competitive as compared to other government association contracts. Staff is seeking authorization to purchase currently budgeted network equipment needed for networking in the Customer Service facility and Operations buildings. Money was budgeted in the previous fiscal year and one piece of equipment has been purchased. The remaining equipment will be purchased as design work identifies what is necessary. This item was eligible for rollover and inadvertently omitted in the August 18, 2005 Capital Outlay Accounts Rollover agenda item. SCHEDULE: May and June 2006 COSTS: Not to exceed $ 18,063 ACCOUNT NO: 2037-8592 BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $ 18,063 ATTACHMENTS: None CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTIO GENERAL MANAGER: YES CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES CATEGORY: Water NO NO -3- General Mana~er RIchard H. 50lbrl9 South Tahoe Public Utility District Directors Tom ComU Jame5 R. Jone5 Mary Lou M0511acher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer . 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe .CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www.StpUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 c. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Carol Swain, Information Systems Manager MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Annual Software Support Costs for Utility Billing Software REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve payment to Springbrook Software, Inc., for software support in the amount of $16,031.40. DISCUSSION: The District's annual software support costs for the Utility Billing software application and its peripheral components is 20% of the original software purchase price, plus a 3% CPI factor added each year. The result of this formula is $15,458.34 for the fiscal year of 7/1/06 - 6/30/07. These services are needed for daily phone support to resolve issues and for minor updates to fix any problems that maybe encountered. Staff requests that the Board approve renewal of the support contract with Springbrook Software, Inc. for the upcoming fiscal year 2006-07. SCHEDULE: July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006 COSTS: $16,031.4 ACCOUNT NO: 1037-6030 and 2037-6030 : BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $75,625 (FY 2007) ATTACHMENTS: Maintenance contract, Invoice copies CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES tf<.iI.J_ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES.:Il11fr f~ NO CATEGORY: Sewer -(5- '. --- ,.. SPRJNGBROoK . SOFTWARE j III SW Fifth AVenue $uitc 2900 ,...lanc1, OR 97204 .} 0312212006 Bill TO South Tahoe PUD 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Tahoe, CA 96150. _ 07/01/2006 I [)[-:':;Cf1IPTIOr'-l QUANTITY RATE AMOUNT Annual SoftWare Maintenance: 711/06 - 6/30/07: 3.00% CPI on Maintenance Fees Custom: Billing Statement Custom: Aging Report Custom Barcode to Stmt App Server Maintenance Bi-Tech Maintenance Centrai Cash Maintenance GIS Maintenance Progress Maintenance: 5 User Report Writer Maintenance Meter Interface Maintenance UB Maintenance 466.93 225.00 300.00 150.00 1,050.60 525.30 2,311.32 630.36 "687.50 250.00 630.36 8,804.03 For questions please contact us at (503)82~22oo 466.93 225.00 300.00 150:00 1,050.60 525.30 2,311.32 630.36 687.50 250.00 630.36 },804.03 /, .' Customer Name: South Tahoe PUD Customer No: 002221 Account No: 0002221 ~ Please remit payment by the due date.to: SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE, INC 111 SW FIFTH AVENUE STE 2900 PORTLAND, OR. 97204- TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $16,031.40 AMOUNT PAID: -7- , . .SProNCSal*,- ... . SO.rrw A.R..i:' ," . 'j : ,,:::~:,:::;:,;','>'>,;'~;:<:'.;:,:;:::'.':'::":, (":,.':~:.' SPRINGBROOK SOFTWARE'.' ':,!',:. " . . ,'. , SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT .: #',' . ". , PARTIES:' . " . .:,' ; .'~. ! ~ '.1,:., ~.\ .....~ <.'. '\. "" '. '. '. .... .... ',',.',. .' ... . . " :,: .... -:. ," ..~ {:......~.:.: .~~: ..~:_~ . ':>.::,' h.' ';: :.,' ~.,:.: :. ..'. '. .: " ~. . , SPlUNGBROOK: .' . Sprfugbrook Software, Inc., an Oregon coIporation 720 S. W~ Wasbington Street, Suite 330 .'. ".PortJai1d, OR 97205 '.. '.' '../.:, Ph. (503) 973.:.7750 . Fax (503) 973-7760 Email: info@springbrooksoftware.com CYSTOMJJ;R: . " , '. ::'... So~th 'J~oe Publlc Utility Distnct, . . , , '. 1275 Meadow CreSt Drive ' , South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 530-544-6474. EFFECTIVE DATE: , i Springbrook has licensed its proprietary software products and programs ("Software") to the Customer, and Customer wishes to have Springbrook maintain and support the use of the Software. Springbrook and Customer therefore agree as follows: 1. Definitions. a. "Software" has that meaning assigned to it pursuant to the Software License Agreement executed by the parties in conjunction with this Agreement (the "License Agreement"). ' . .' . b. "Enhancement" means any modification or addition that, when made or added to the Software, materially changes its utility, efficiency, functional capability, or application, but that does not constitute solely ~ Error Correction. Spring brook may designate Enhancements as minor or major, '. depending on its ~sessment of their value and of the function added to the ", Software. . Co "Error" means any failure of the Software to conform in any material respect . 'to i~ published specifications. , . " d. . "Error Correction" means either a modification or addition that, when made or adde~ to the Software, brings the Software into material ~nformity with its . . SOF.TW ARE MAINTENANCE AGREElVfENT . Page I ofi -8- . . . , .... . . . .' ....<....:. ....published specificati~ns,'ora'proced~e or routine that, wh~n obs~~ed~th~ . .... - . .:..0. .regular operatio~ ~f the Soflware, avoids the practical' adverse .effect of such . ..... "'DOi9'\CO-~O'~~ty ". ',. . . ...... .." ' 'ulU....~. .,.... .~ .. ; '.' .' .. \, ".' :' . ' .' .' . '.: '. . ~ . . '. ~ .'. "MaJ or EnbancemeJlt" ~eanS either' the total reWrite or'~. application :'., : . and/or additional functionality benefiting only certain entities, not all.' '.' '. . customers as'a w~ole,' and requiring these enhaDcements to ~e packaged as a .' "separateModule.' :.' ....... '.. .'. '.' . ..... " ":.,. '.. . . . . . . ..,. .'. . .'. . . , . . . t ; "Releases" means new versions of the SoftWare, which may incbide Error ".: Corrections aridlor Enhancements... " g. ,"TemporarY Fix" m~ an initial correction or ecfix" to a problein in the software prior to the release of an error correction. 2. Term: Automatlc Renewal: Termination. The initial term of this Agreement shall be from the Effe9tive Date to the end of Customer's fiscal year, subject to renewal thereafter. During this Agreement's first term, Customer shall pay for maintenance for each module licensed pro rata as determined by the number of months from one month following start of :first training session to the end of Customer's fiscal year. Springbrook shall bill and CUstomer shall pay for maintenance provided under this _ Agreement on an annual basis, payment due as of the start of each maintenance term. This Agreement shall automatically renew after the initial term for subsequent terms of one (1) year each unless and until eitJier party gives the other no less than thirty (30) days' written notice of termination in advance of the termination of the then- current term. This Agreement shall'tenninate upon Customer's failure to pay any fees due hereunder when due, or to pay any fees owing to Spring brook pursuant to any License Agreement or Service Agreement between the parties, or pursuant to any other tenn of this Agreement, after 30 days' prior written notice to Customer from Springbrook. Should Customer cancel this Agreement and wish to renew at a later date, back maintenance must be paid in,full or applications re-purchased.. 3. Scope of Maintenance. During the term of this Agreement, Spring brook agrees to provide Basic Maintenance semces in support of the Software. Basic maintenance services shall consist of: . a. Error Correction. Springbrook will use all reaso"nable diligence to Correct- . verifiable and reproducible Errors within a reasonable time period after reported to Spring brook The Error Correction, when completed, may be provided in the fonn of a "temporary fix," consisting of suffic~ent progJ.1lU1t11ing and operating instructions to implement the Error Correction. b. TelephoneIModem Support. Springbrook shall maintain a telephone and . . . .modem'support line, or DSL Internet connection, or Tl cOnnection to the . Internet during normal business hoUrs (6AM to S PM PacificTime) that . permits Customer to 'report Erro~ in the Software and to receive as.sistance in . SOFTW AR.E MAiNTENANCE AGREEMENT . P3ge ~ of? South Tahoe PUD July 2002 -9- 7', ' : ' ' ~ .. . ..',' cases of operator error_' Customer agrees to provide and maintain a modem, or . ." ..... '..~.":. DSL Inteme~ coPneCtio~ .or .Ti .int~et 'conn~tion, PC ~ywher~~ 'and .' ." . .' ..,.. . dedicated modem line on Customer's NT server and allow Springbrook to maintain and support Springbrook's application softwaievia one of the above sta~ed options' with full ~ministrative permissions to .tb.ec;lrive where the . . application resid~" ~OTE: .In o~der to ~elV~ you properly, Springbrook must . .re.qUire that the modem be located physically in the selVer, not in a : . . . workstation on yom: network. SpririgbrOQk reserves the right to bill hourly . (following Customers approval) for maintenance incases ofrepe~ted .operator errOr, where a single operator erronesu1ts in extensive Springbrook time to resolve.the problem. '.Any South Tahoe Public Utility District information that ~ Springbrook obtains through Internet connection is consid~red confidential. . . . c. . Changes In State alJ,d Federal Reguiations. Springbrook will provide updates needed to confomi to state and federal regulations, mcluding changes to tax tables and routine forms before changes become effective. Maintenance services under this A.greement do not hlclude updates to C?Onform to any changes in local governmental regulations, including without limitation . changes in utility billing rates, reports or methods. . . d. . Routine Releases. Springbrook may, from time to time, issue routine . Releases 'of the Softw~e, containing Error Corrections and minor Enhancements'to customers who have maintenance agreements in effect. Installation 'of routine releases is provided at no charge to customer if . completed over the modem. Installation of routine releases and updates by Springbrook at Customer's site will be billed to Customer at the then current . hourly rate except in cases where Spring brook is solely responsible for the inability to provide modem support. e. Discounts on Major Enhancement Releases. Springbrook may~ from time to time, offer major Enhancements to Customer, generally for an additional charge. To the extent Springbrook offers such Enhancements, it shall permit t Customer to obtain one copy of each major Enhancement for e.ach copy of the S9ftware being main~ed under this Agreement at the discount then specified by Springbrook. 4. ExceDtions. The following matters are not covered by Basic Maintenance, and are . outside the scope of service~ provided pursuant to this Agreement: a. On-site suppo~ by employees or agents of Springbrook; b. Training users in the prop'~ operation of the Software; Co . Any problem resulting from Customer's misuse, iniproper use, alteration, or . damage of1:he Software, unless approved by Spring brook in writing; SOFTV{ ARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT South Tahoe PlJD July 2002 P3ge 3 of7 -10- 'd. ..SuPPort of op~g sYst~~ SUPPQi't of non-SPt~gl?ro~k s~ftware~ .... . . . . " :including but not limited to spreadsheets~ womi>1'()cessors~. and general office , .. ." .' 'software;. ..... . '. :.'. "::..: .' ':' '. . .... ::.': :.:,'. . . '. a .... . . .' "... .' ~ . '.. . .' J: ,..', ":( :. . ,..' ... ". . .. . . . e. Inst8nation, implementay,on, thta conversion and Implemenbition .". Management Services. ..... . .'... ' : '. '. .... .... , ". ".. I, ',. f. Training and co~ting reqtrlreci on an n;dividual Customer basis for upgrades. '. . . . : g.. Set up and assistance with test databases. .. h. Set up, support for and m~tenance of addition81 producti~n'databases: 5. . Cooneratlon of Customer. . Customer agrees to notify Springbrook promptly following the discovery of any Error~ Further, upon discovery of an Error, Customer agrees, if requested by Spring brook, to submit to Springbrook a listing of output and any other data that Spring brook may require in order to reproduce the Error and the operating conditions under which the Error occurred or was discovered. . Springbrook shall treat any such data as confidential. . 6. Fees' and Expenses. The initial Maintenance Fee will be as invoiced to Customer as per con!fitions under Section 2. Maintenance Fees are due and payable at the beginning of the initial and each renewal term hereunder. Maintenance fees will apply to all licensed products and to any modifications made to those products if those modifica~ons require support and/or additional programming services during upgrades to new releases; Maintenance fees are based o~ a percentage of the then current retall value of the licensed products. Maintenance Fees do notinc1ude travel (including travel time) and living expenses for installation and training; on-site support, installation or training; :file and data conyersion costs; consulting services; . shipping charges; Implementation Management Services or the costs of any, recommended hardware. Customer agrees to pay such fees and costs, when and as the services are rendered and the expenses incurred, ~ approved by Customer and invoiced by Springbrook. SpriBgbrookshall provide supporting documentation for . all expenses upon customer request. Springbrook reserves the right to require' prepayment or advanCe deposit for sUch additional charges or expenses in some instanCes. Customer is also responsible for sales or use taxes and state or local . property or excise taxes associated with licensing, possession; or use of the Software . or any associated services. The Maintenance percentage and/or resulting' fee may . change for renewals, provided that Spring brook gives Customer written notice of the change no less than thirty (30) days prior to the automatic renewal date set forthin . Section 2. All fees paid hereunder are nonrefundable and will be forfeited in the eventoftennination or cancellati9n except as specifically provided in Sections 10 and 11. . . ." . . . SOFTWARE MAiNTENANCE AGREEMENT South Taho~ PUD July' 2002 Page.. of7' . -11- .;" . . . .' .. : .;,.":. . '. '~ , , . '" . '" ' '. !', " . ..... . .' . . 7~ . Work' Orders.. Customer may from tinle t~ tinte ~ues~ fraIl?- Spring brook services,. . . :.... . ~~ch as software modifi.c~tio1)S or ad<lluonaJ' training.' SpIingbrdokshall m*e a .' '. '. reasonable and good faith effort to comply With such requests but shall retain the' . . sole right to decide whether such services are executed.' The CustOIl?-Cr shaJlreceive , 'from Springb~k ~ ~te of th~ ~stof ~equested services. Spnngbiook shall . : receive for all approved Customer requests a signed work order from the CUstomer and a deposit equal to fifty percent of the estimated cost of the service. , . . "'d . '. .. ", 8. Billin!!. All invoi~' ~m Springbrook't~ the Cust~~~ fo~ any product or service . are due upon receipt. Invoices are past due 30 days after the date of invoice. . . Springb~ook may, at its option, charge all invoices 3Q days and older ~ interest at a rate of one and one-nalfpercent (1 ~%) per month (eighteen percent (18%) per annum) or, ifless, the highest rate allowed by applicable law from the 4ate such fee or charge first became past due. Invoices are delinquent 60 days after the date of invoice. A delinquent invoice may caus~ Spring brook, at.its ~ption, to put the . Customer'.s account,on hold. Accounts on hold may receive no product, service, or support from Spring brook until all past due and delinque~tinvoices are paid in full. . .' ;. , ". ~ .' . .... . '.', ", . 9. Use and Restrictions. The Customer's rights and obligations concerning the use of . any Error Corrections, Enhancements, or Releases (or any other programming 'provided by Spring brook, regardless of its form or purpose) shall be as provided in the License .Agreem.ent Springbrook shall have sole and exclus~ve ownership of all . right, title and interest in and to such works (including ownership of all copyrights and other intellectual property rights pertaining thereto), subject only to the license expressly granted to customer therein. . 10. Limited Remedv and Liability: Exclusion ofConseauential Dama2es. The . cumulative liability of Sprlngbrook to Customer for all claims relating to any services rende~ed hereunder, in contract, tort, or otherwise, shall not exceed the tC?tat amount of the Maintenance Fee paid to Springbrook pursuant to this Agreement In no event shall Springbrook be liable to Customer for any consequential, in~ect, special, or incidental damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business profits, business intenuption, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss), even if Spring brook has been advised of the possibility of such potential loss or damage. The foregoing limitation of liability and exclusion of certain damages shall apply regardless of the success or effectiveness of other . remedi~, and shall apply to an claims under the warranty described in Section 11. . Springbrook's liability for breach of warranty exists only during the warranty period set forth in Section 11. . . . - . . . . 11. Limited Warranty and Exclusions. SPRINGBROOK WARRANTS THAT IT WILL RENDER ITS SERVICES HEREUNDER IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER. DURING THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT AND FOR A PERIOD OF SlX (6) MONTHS THEREAFTER SPRINGBROOK, . 'AT SPRINGBROOK'S SOLE COST, SHALL CORRECf ANY FAILURE TO RENDER ITS SERVICES HEREUNDER IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE . SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT . Pl.lge 5 of7 .' SOllth Tahat: pun . ':July 2001 -12- '. MANNER. ANY CLAIM BAsED. ONTHE FOREGOINGW~ MUST BE SUBMITIED IN WRITING TO SPRlNGBROOK. ,CUSTOMER AGREES ',THAT THE FOREGOING LIMITED WARRANTY lS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER , . WARRANTIES OF SPRING BROOK AND SPRINGBROOK DISCLAIMS ALL . OTIIER W ARR.ANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLffiD"lNCLUDrNG, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED W ~ OF MERCHANTABll..ITY, FITNESS OR ADEQUACY FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, . QUALITY OR PRODUCTIVENESS, OR CAPACiTY, OR THAT THE . SERVICES RENDERED HEREUNDER WTI..L BE ERROR-FREE. NO ACTION AGAINST SPRINGBROOK FOR BREACH OF TIllS LIMiTED WARRANTY MAY BE COMMENCED MORE mAN 90 DAYS AFfER EXPIRATION OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD STATED iN TInS SECTION 11. 12. Govemine: Law: Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by arid construed and ~nforced in accordance with the laws oftbe State of California. Venue for any action brought by Licensor against Licensee, and for any counterclaims or cross claims " thereto, shall only be in the Federai District Court in the State of California, or any 'state court in the State of California. Venue for any action brought by the Licensee and for any counterclaims or cross claims thereto, shaIl only be in the Federal , District Court in the State of Oregon, or any state court in the State of Oregon. 13. ' Entire Ae:reement: Modification. This Agreement is the complete and e~c1usive statement of the maintenance agreement between Springbrook and Customer and supercedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations. discussions. proposals and understandings. oral, written or implied, includmg those involving any agent of either party, relating to the subject matter herein. No representations or statements made by either party or either party's agents not expressly stated herein are binding on either party. The terms of this Agreement may only be modified, expanded or added to by a written agreement executed by the parties. No oral communication between the parties or their agents before or after execution of this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless the parties expressly agree in writing to the terms of such communication. IN WITNESS WHEReOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate by its duly authorized officer or representative. SPRlNGBROOK CUSTOMER SOFTWARE MAIN'l;ENANC'E AGREEMENT South Tahoe PUD ' . July 2002 ' Page 6 of 7 -13- General Manager RIchard H. SoIlmll South Tahoe Public' Utility District Directors Tom Comu James R. Jones Marylou Mosbacher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive a South Lake Tahoe'CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474 - Fax 530541-0614- www.StpUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 d. TO: Board of Directors , FROM: Debbie Henderson, Accounting Manager MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Sewer Enterprise 2006-07 Appropriations Subject to Limitation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2811-06 setting the limitation on appropriations for fiscal year 2006-07. DISCUSSION: This is the District's annual resolution called for by Constitutional Amendment XIIIB. The limitation on Appropriations for fiscal year 2006-07 is $49,987,533. The Sewer Enterprise fund budget for fiscal year 2006-07 appropriates $24,520,076. As such, the District is $25,467,457 below the state mandated spending limit. SCHEDULE: Adopt resolution June 1, 2006 COSTS: N/A ACCOUNT NO: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2811-06 and a calculation of the permitted , appropriation groWth rate. CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO CATEGORY: Sewer -16- 1 2, 3 4 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2811-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ADOPTING THE SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMITATION AND PROCEEDS OF TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 6 WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have elected to approve 7 Constitutional Amendment XlIB, and the Legislature of the State of California has voted 8 to adopt Senate Bill No. 1352, which implements Constitutional Amendment XIIB, 9 setting the method of computing annual appropriations subject to limitation of local non- 10 residential construction and population; and 11 WHEREAS, the Directors selected the change in per capita personal income; 12 13 14 and WHEREAS, such legislation sets the base year for this computation as Fiscal Year 1978-79; and WHEREAS, such legislation required documentation setting such appropriation 15 limitations shall be available to the public fifteen days, prior to the adoption of this 16 resolution; and 17 WHEREAS, on May 12, 2006, such documentation was made public: 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the South 19 Tahoe Public Utility District does find and declare that the appropriations subject to 20 limitation for Fiscal Year 2006-07 are: $24,520,076; and that for Fiscal Year 2006-07, 21 the proceeds of taxes are defined in the enabling statues are: $6,342,001; and that the 22 increase in proceeds of taxes over the appropriations subject to limitations is: $-0. 23 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a duly held regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Public Utility District on the 1st day of June, 2006, by the 24 following vote: 25 AYES: 26 NOES: 27 ABSENT: 28 //1/11/11/1,,//11/ 29 1/1//1/11/111/11/ 30 //1/11/1///111// -17- 1 Resolution No. 2811-06 2 June 1, 2006 Page 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ATTEST: 10 11 12 13 14 15 Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -18-' Eric W. Schafer, Board President South Tahoe Public Utility District SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ~ennitted Growth Rate in Appropriations for 2006-07 Appropriation Limitation 2005-06 $47,350,131 Increase In CA Per Capita Personal Income 3.96+ 100.00= 100 1.0396 Increase In Population El Dorado County 1.55 + 100.00= 100 1.0155 Change Ratio 1.0396 x 1.0155 x 1.0557, Appropriations Limitation for 2006-07 Actual Appropriations 2006-07 Limitation Exceeding Actual Appropriations 2006-07 $49,987,533 $24,520,076 $25,467,457 Historical Appropriations Limitations & Proceeds Of Taxes I ~ Appropriation Umitation - Actual Appropriations I $60 $50 ! $40 o = $30 :e .5 $20 $10 $0 Fiscal Year 2008-07 Actual Appropriations: : Cash Expenditures $19,757,076 Depreciation .,763,000 Total nditures 4,520,076 ' -19- Genel"liil Mana08r RIchard H. 5o'I1rill South . Tahoe '. Public ,Utility District Direccors Tom Comu James R. Jones Mary Lou Mosbacher Duane Wallac/l Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe' CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530541-0614. mw.stpud.u5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 e. TO: FROM: Board of Directors Jim Hoggatt, Construction Manager/Engineer , , MEETING DATE: June 1,2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Customer Service, Operations and Laboratory Facility REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Task Order to Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers in the amount of $18,550 to provide a hazardous materials abatement survey of the existing administration building. ' , , DISCUSSION: The existing administration building has not been checked or certified that it is free of hazardous materials such as asbestos, lead paint, etc. which is required before the building can be demolished. This Task Order includes a hazardous material survey and report, and also provides the plans and specifications for an appropriate, legal and compliant methodology for abatement of any hazardous material identified in , the report. If the survey comes up negative, Winzler & Kelly will provide the hazardous free certification required. If not, Phase 2 of this Task Order will be determined once the amount of hazardous material to be removed is known. SCHEDULE: ASAP COSTS: $18,550 ACCOUNT NO: DSTHDQ BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: <$1,740,065> ATTACHMENTS: Proposal from Winzler & Kelly, budget analysis CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO CATEGORY: Water -21- W' ~ZLER&KELLY CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 18, 2006 Mr. Jim Hoggatt Engineering Department Manager South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Subject: Task Order Request Existing Administration Building Hazardous Materials Abatement Dear Mr. Hoggatt: As we have discussed, Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers is pleased to submit our Task Order request to the South Tahoe Public Utility District for Phase 1 of the Existing Administration Building Hazardous Materials Abatement. It is understood that the scope and budget for Phase 2 work, the field observations during actual abatement and final clearance certification, will be developed following determination of the amount of hazardous materials to be removed. This Task Order would be executed in accordance with Winzler & Kelly's Master Agreement with the District. The Existing Administration Building Hazardous Materials Abatement Phase 1 effort is defined by the attached scope of work, based on a lump sum fee of $18,550. Winzler & Kelly is ready to start work immediately to support the District's current demolition schedule. We look forward to continued service to the District. Please feel free to contact me at 916-799- 3114 if there are any questions or a need for additional information. Sincerely, WINZLER & KELLY c:?=L.~ Senior Project Manager Attachments ... 1215 WK" Street, 17th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 ... tel 916.503.2271 fax 916.503.3632 \\'\\w.w-and-k.com ... -23- South Tahoe Public Utility District Existing Administration Building Hazardous Materials Abatement Task Order Scope of Work Phase 1 .;... Hazardous Materials Survey and Abatement Documents Winzler & Kelly will conduct a hazardous materials survey of the existing South Tahoe Public Utility District Administration Building which is soon to be demolished. Winzler & Kelly will then prepare the required plans and specifications for the removal and disposal of hazardous building materials by a qualified Contractor. Note: The Winzler & Kelly Phase 2 scope of work for field observations during actual abatement and final clearance certification will be develop~d following delermination of the amount of materials to be removed. ' Task 1.0 Hazardous Materials Survey Winzler & Kelly will conduct a hazardous material study of the existing building materials on the project site. Based on the age of the existing Administration Building (circa 1959) it is assumed that the building has lead-containing and asbestos-containing materials. Subtask 1.1 Field Surveys Asbestos A. Asbestos - Survey Methodology The asbestos inspection will be accomplished in accordance with the requirements of 8 CCR 1529, AHERA and NESHAPS requirements in accordance with the following procedure. Winzler & Kelly will perform a visual identification by assessing all accessible structural, architectural, finish and mechanical components/systems for the presence of suspect asbestos- containing materials (ACM). Each SUSP(;ct ACM identified during the initial walk through will then be bulk sampled in accordance with sampling guidelines. Sampling procedures utilized include: . Location and total quantity of each suspect ACM will be tabulated. . Suspect materials will then be categorized into homogeneous materials. A homogeneous material is defined as being uniform in texture, color, and date of application. . A sampling scheme will then be developed based upon the location and quantity of the various homogeneous materials utilizing the requirements of AHERA. . Asbestos certified personnel (CAC, CSST) using appropriate sampling tools leak-tight containers will collect bulk samples. . Bulk sampling tools will then be decontamination to prevent the spread of secondary contamination to subsequent bulk samples. . Each collected bulk sample will be individually numbered and recorded on a Bulk Sample Log and site drawing. '. A Chain of Custody Record will be maintained for the samples. Scope of Wark -1- Rev. 1 5-18-06 -24- Asbestos Analytical Methodology - Polarized Light Microscopy Collected samples of suspect ACM will then be delivered to a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. These samples will then be analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) utilizing dispersion staining techniques in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's "Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials" U.S. EPN600/R-93/116, dated July 1993 and adopted by the NVLAP, NVLAP Test Method Code 18/AOl, as affiliated with the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). The turn-around time for analysis is 3-5 days. Asbestos- Analytical Methodology- Point Count Should sample results indicate trace (<1%) concentrations of asbestos, or previous sampling results are questionable, additional analysis will be recommended utilizing a 400-point count methodology to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos in the material. This may lead to significant cost savings if a material (such as acoustical plaster) that has been previously tested at 1-2% is point counted and found to contain less than 1%. This will reduce the cost of removal, clearance and disposal. The turn-around time for analysis is 3-5 days. Lead A. Lead- Survey Methodology The lead survey will be accomplished utilizing a NIT ON XL x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrum analyzer. The XRF utilizes a nondestructive means for direct reading measurements to determine , the presence of building components coated with lead-based paint or lead-containing surface coatings. The lead-based paint survey to be accomplished is a construction-level LBP survey that is used to quickly screen areas for the presence of LBP and LCSC without the need for exhaustive or destructive testing operations. Representative samples of building components will be collected from the interior and exterior of each identified building within the site utilizing a modified version of the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995. Lead Analytical Methodology The X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) detector proposed for this survey is the NITON XL 309 Spectrum Analyzer. All Winzler & Kelly operators are DHS LBP Inspector/Assessors, have been trained by NITON Corporation on the proper operating techniques and have been issued a certificate. Winzler & Kelly maintains a Radioactive Materials License for storage and use of our XRF in accordance with the requirements of the State of California's Radiologic Health Branch. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) is defined as any painted surface exceeding 5000 ppm or 1.0 mglcm2 as set forth in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. Lead-Containing Surface Coatings (LCSC) are surfaces that contain lead as defined by OSHA in accordance with the requirements of 8 CCR 1532.1. Scope of Work -2- Rev. 1 5-18-06 -26- PCB, Universal Waste (UW), and other Potential Hazardous Materials Methodology Fixtures suspected to contain Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ballasts, mercury-containing light tubes, non-incandescent lamps, and mercury-containing thermostat switches will identified by entering each area, assessing suspect assemblies that may contain PCB's, light tubes, other non-incandescent light bulbs, or mercury-containing switches and calculating the total quantity of suspect assemblies present. During this task samples will not be taken to confirm the presence of hazardous material. Typically components are clearly labeled on if they contain hazardous materials. Other suspected hazardous materials will also be noted when observed. Sub task 1.2 Hazardous Materials Report Winzler & Kelly will prepare both a draft and final Hazardous Materials Report which includes an Executive Summary and all related project analysis of materials sampled. Winzler & Kelly will provide rough magnitude quantities of hazardous materials along with an approximation of construction costs. Task 2.0 Hazardous Materials Abatement Documents Subtask 2.1 Hazardous Materials Abatement Specifications Winzler & Kelly will develop specifications for an appropriate, legal and compliant methodology for abatement of the identified asbestos, lead, and Universal Waste (UW) materials found in the Administration Building. The specifications will cover applicable regulatory requirements for notification, removal, clearance, transportation and disposal. Subtask 2.2 Hazardous Materials Abatement Drawings Winzler & Kelly will develop abatement drawings to identify where hazardous materials are found. We will develop a set of notes that will compliment the specifications as well as the regulations that are set forth for each hazard. The District will provide an electronic background drawing of the Administration Building to assist in the development of the abatement drawings. Scope of Work -3- , Rev. 1 5-18-06 -26- W&K Task Order Budget (5-18-06) STPUD: Admin Bldg Hazmat Abatement W&K LABOA CLASSIFICATION FEE COIIPUT ATION PMIOA Eng TICh CAOO WPlClerlc Tolal W&K W&K T..k Oesc....1on &178 $138 &IDO &IDO S65 W&K Offlco TOIaI Lob "*" Trlvel IliR IliR IHR IHA IHR HoUfl ~ W&K TeslS ~ &A- Tot., PM.. 1 . HUmIIl Survev Ind AbIIlement Document. T..k 1 . Hozm.' SunHw ubtook 1.1 Huml! FIoId SurveYS 16 16 2 ~ S60 &3.950 &3050 1264 $480 $7.744 Sublllk f.4 Humsl 2 12 8 4 6 32 $108 &3.668 11M $3.822 SubtOhlI- T.. 1 2 21 24 I I 61 $118 &7.111 n.05O 1411 $410 $11566 iI!!U.:-~1 AIlI_ Ooc.- 24 $72 -, 52.692 1132 $80 s2.904 Subtook 2.1 Hozm.IAbllomonl ' IcoIIons 2 8 8 6 ubluk 2,4 HIZmIf AblI_ Dr._ ' 2 12 4 12 2 32 $132 n.832 1110 $138 $4,080 Sublolll. T..k 2 4 20 12 12 I 5& $201 &6.521 SO 1312 5211 $6.984 Ph... 2. """lemon' 0........,1ons IIld teB TBD T AI. UA PER o.AS~IFICATlON: 8 41 38 18 18 $122 $372 $11 112 $3 050 lHO ..18 II! 550 TOTAL W&K LABOR COSTS PEA CLASSIFICATION: &1050 .ISO n.6llO $1.&00 51.1110 $13 770 . . NOIos: 1. 0lI1er dirlCl cosle IIld .__ _ . 10% _l1Itive .... -27- CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER LABORATORY & OPERATIONS FACIUlY Accounts: 2029-8401 & 8677 BUDGET ~EMAINING ANALYSIS: Spent to date Outstanding Purchase Orders- AMEC Earth & Environmental Andersen Audio Visual Comp View Groves Mobile Homes Lumos Associates Neff Rental Inc. Roebbelen Contracting Inc. Smith Design Group Tahoe Valley Electric Supply Western Power & Equipment Total Encumbered Total Spent & Encumbered Budget 2006 Under (Over) Budget Budget 2007 Under (Over) Financial Plan 2005/06 All Years 7,110,900 9,377,239 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,014 1,014 0 0 2,873,511 2,873,511 41,516 41,516 13,124 13,124 0 0 2,929,165 2,929,165 10,040,065 12,306,404 8,300,000 10,566,339 (1,740,065) 22,872,742 481,500 481,500 (1 ,258,565) (1,258,565l. -28- South Tahoe ,Public Utility District Gener.al Manaa"r Richard H. 5oll>rig Directors Tom Comu James R. Jones Mar"r Lou Mosl>acher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe' CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474' Fax 530541-0614. www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 f. ' TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Arsenic Treatment Study REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve proposal from Carollo Engineers (CE) in the amount of $116,180.00 to complete Phase II of the Arsenic Treatment Study (A TS) for the Arrowhead Well No.3. DISCUSSION: On March 2, 2006, the Board approved the February 21, 2006 Phase I Scope of Services and Budget from Carollo Engineers (CE) to complete those tasks required to develop a California Department of Health Services (CaDHS) - approved protocol for pilot testing selected arsenic treatment technologies at the Arrowhead Well No.3 site (AH 3). This included reviewing available water quality, operations and other relevant data for the AH 3, completing a desk top evaluation of various arsenic treatment technologies and developing a protocol for pilot testing selected technologies. The Phase I work is documented in the Preliminary Arsenic Treatment Evaluation Technical Memorandum (CE, 04/21/2006) and the Arsenic Treatment Study Pilot Testing Protocol- Draft (CE, April 2006). .Phase II includes performance of the ATS pilot test and completion of an ATS Report for CaDHS-approval. Based on the findings of the Phase I data review and treatment technologies evaluation, CE is recommending that the District conduct a pilot test to collect sufficient engineering systems design data for a full-scale system using Coagulation/Filtration (C/F) and Sorptive Media (SM) treatment technologies. Pilot testing will: 1) confirm treatment efficacy in terms of arsenic removal and overall finished water quality; 2) provide District operators an opportunity to directly observe and work with the proposed treatment options; 3) provide engineering data required to refine design criteria and treatment system cost estimates; and 4) provide CaDHS the necessary treatment system testing data required for permitting. -29- Bergsohn June 1, 2006 Page 2 . CE is proposing to: provide the necessary engineering staff and equipment to conduct the coagulation/filtration portion of theATS pilot test; provide the necessary engineering staff and equipment to assist District staff conduct the sorptive media portion of the A TS pilot test; compile and evaluate the collected data; and complete a CaDHS-approved A TS Report to allow for the design of a cost-effective, full-scale A TS. District staff concurs with the approach presented in the ATS Pilot Testing Protocol and recommends that the Board approve the CE proposal for this work, as submitted. SCHEDULE: June 2006 through January 2007 (estimated) COSTS: $116,180.00 (estimated)~' ACCOUNT NO: 2029-8718/ARSNIC BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $107,000 (FY 2007) ATTACHMENTS: Carollo Engineers, Arsenic Treatment Study, Phase 2 - Scope of Work and Budget, dated May 24, 2006. CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO CATEGORY: Water -30- AI' carOLLO , enGineers Dedicated to creative. responsive. quality solutions for those we serve. May 23, 2006 7433aOO Mr.lvo Bergsohn, P.G. HG South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, California 96150 Subject: Arsenic Treatment Study, Phase 2 Dear Ivo: Carollo Engineers (Carollo) is pleased that the District Staff has selected Carollo to provide services to assist the District with the Phase 2 of the Arsenic Treatment Study. This proposal is based on our understanding of the engineering services necessary to develop predesign information for Arrowhead Well No. ,3 through pilot testing of Coagulation/Filtration (C/F) and single-use Sorptive Medias (SM) and coordinate activities with the California Department of Health Services (CaDHS). The services to be provided by Carollo under this proposal are presented in our Scope of Services (Exhibit A, attached). This Scope has been divided into tasks based upon our understanding of the project. The proposed engineering cost for the completion of the tasks contained in the Scope is $116,180. The development of this cost is detailed in the attached Labor Hour and Cost Proposal (Exhibit B). This project will be administered under the existing March 3, 2006 Master Agreement for Consulting Services. Engineering fees will ,be based on the current fee schedule (Exhibit C.) The project team for the completion of this project will be Robert Gillette, Partner-in-charge, Tom Gillogly, Project Manager, and Jason Davis, Project Engineer. Please review the material contained herein and, if acceptable, submit them to the Board of Directors for approval. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. Sincerely , CAROLLO ENGINEERS, P.C. ~.~ Robert A. Gillette, P.E. Partner ~ ,-A),:::> ____, c- Thomas E.T. Gillogly, Ph.D. Project Manager RAG:jlm Enclosures: Exhibit A - Scope of Services Exhibit B - Labor Hour and Cost Proposal Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Exhibit D - Project Schedule Exhibit E - TM2 (Pilot Testing Protocol) 2500 VENTURE OAKS WAY. SUITE 320 . SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95833 . (916) 565-4888 . FAX (916) 565-4880 -31- EXHIBIT A SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ARSENIC TREATMENT STUDY Scope of Services The following describes the Scope of Services for the engineering effort to complete a pilot study of arsenic treatment t~chnologies including field testing services at Arrowhead Well NO.3 and a final report. The report will include a discussion of pilot test results, preliminary design criteria and preliminary cost estimates for the arsenic treatment technologies. The Arrowhead Well NO.3 arsenic concentration in the raw water averages approximately 0.015 mg/L. The new EPA (and California) Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic is 0.010 mg/L. Previous desktop evaluation work during Phase I of the study revealed that coagulation/filtration (C/F) andlor single-use sorptive medias (SM) represented feasible arsenic treatment alternatives. Phase II of the study will take these recommended treatment alternatives and test them in the field. A treatment study report will be developed based on field testing results. Engineering services for Phase II work will be provided by Carollo Engineers (Engineer) as requested by the South Tahoe Public Utility District (District). INTRODUCTION The existing Arrowhead Well NO.3 site contains a HiPOx system used as needed to remove MtBE. Water produced from this well may be pumped directly to the distribution system (i.e., no local surge or storage tank). Alternatively, the water may be pumped to the HiPOX system to remove MtBE, and then pumped into the distribution system using an in-line booster pump. Earlier work during Phase I by the Engineer outlined two potential arsenic treatment altematives that may prove effective. Both CIF and SM treatment technologies are being used in full-scale facilities world-wide and represent to the District, the lowest capital and life-cycle costs compared to other available treatment technologies. Pilot testing provides the following benefits to the project: · Confirm treatment efficacy in terms of arsenic removal and overall finished water quality (e.g,. corrosivity). · Provide early "buy-in" by California Department of Health Services (CaDHS) to help speed up permitting any new modifications to the well. · Offer operators a hands-on opportunity to see and operate proposed treatment options. · Develop preliminary design criteria to help reduce conservative safety factors that would otherwise be used if there was no pilot testing. · Refine cost estimates from planning level to preliminary cost estimate level. PROJECT TASKS The following Tasks are included in the Scope of Services for this work. Please note that this scope covers Phase II work including field-testing and an arsenic treatment study report. Progress reports, on-site meetings, meetings with CaDHS, general coordination with CaDHS, and a final workshop are included as part of this work. May 24,2006 , A-1 C:\GilIog1y\01 . Projeetl\STPUD_TETG\STPUD_BOI\7433aOO (Arsenlc)\Contracts\Phase II\A TS P2. EXHIBIT A - Scope_3.doc -32- Task 1 - Pilot-Testing The Engineer will mobilize, test, and demobilize equipment necessary for pilot testing. A temporary shelter (-14'L x -11'W x -12'H) to protect the C/F and 8M equipment from the weather will be assembled with the aid of District staff. District staff will complete the mechanical and electrical connections to the pilot equipment, including temporary piping for the various process streams (e.g., feed, filtrate, waste, etc.) to be routed onsite in such a manner to convey necessary flow rates. ' C/F process will be tested first 8M testing will commence immediately following the completion of the C/F testing. Exhibit E details the testing protocol for each of the two processes. Ten (10) and seven (7) tests will be conducted for the C/F and 8M processes, respectively, to gather the necessary evaluation data. Wastes produced from each process will be tested for classification as hazardous or non-hazardous waste. The Engineer will provide operation for t~e C/F testing. The Engineer will train District staff for monitoring and operation during 8M testing. District staff will be responsible for the majority of monitoring and operation during 8M testing. Laboratory analyses for both C/F and 8M testing will be completed by District staff or sent to a District contracted laboratory. Power, water supply, and water disposal will be paid directly by the District. There will be one meeting mid-way through the pilot testing to discuss test results to date and assess the remainder of the 8M pilot testing activities and discuss the testing duration. The work to be completed under this task includes: · Equipment installation in conjunction with District staff as described above. · On-site operation and collection of data from pilot-scale C/F testing. · Coordination and direction of District staff operation of 8M testing equipment. . One site visit to assist with a change-out/replacement of exhausted 8M. · Demobilization of pilot testing equipment. · Progress Meeting. . Progress Reports. Task 2 - Arsenic Treatment Study Report The Engineer will develop a report analyzing C/F and SM technology per field results. Preliminary design criteria and updated costs will be included as part of the final report. The report will be used as a basis for the workshop that will follow pilot testing. After incorporation of District comments, the report will be submitted toCaDHS for review. A final report will be issued that will incorporate CaDHS comments. The workshop will be conducted on site at the District office. Two meetings with CaDH8 will be conducted in person at CaDHS offices, with addition communication conducted via phone and e-mail. The work to be completed under this task includes: . Data analysis and report writing. · Meetings with District and CaDHS May 24, 2006 A-2 C:\Gillogly\01 . Projects\STPUD_TETG\STPUD_BOI\7433aOO (Arsenic)\Contracts\Phase IIIATS P2 - EXHIBIT A - 5cope_3.doc -33- DISTRICT PROVIDED INFORMATION ANDIOR SERVICES 1) Forklift and operator for unloading and loading of pilot skids., 2) Electrician, as needed, for hookup of pilot skids and ancillary equipment. 3) Maintenance worker for setup of temporary shelter for elF and SM pilot skids. 4) Operator over a minimum 3-month duration for daily monitoring and collection of data during SM technology testing. 5) Operator/Maintenance worker available to troubleshoot and/or install parts during SM technology testing. 6) Analytical laboratory services for water samples and residuals classification collected during pilot testing. 7) Analytical laboratory space for storage and processing of waste produced from pilot testing. 8) Wastewater treatment facility f1owrates, sludge production data, and sludge quality (% solids, nine 503 inorganic constituents, etc.) over the last three years. 9) Record drawings of the wastewater collection system for the area around Arrowhead Well No.3. , ENGINEER DELlVERABLES CaDHS Pilot Testing Protocol Meeting - agenda and minutes Pilot Progress Meeting (District) - agenda and minutes Workshop (District) - agenda and minutes CaDHS Pilot Testing Results Meeting - agenda and minutes 3 copies + pdf 3 copies + pdt 3 copies + pdt 3 copies + pdt 3 copies + pdt 3 copies + pdt 3 copies + pdt Arsenic Treatment Study Report (District Draft) Arsenic Treatment Study Report (CaDHS Draft) Arsenic Treatment Study Report (Final) Biweekly (every 2 weeks) E-mail Progress Reports Electronic SCHEDULE See Exhibit D (attached). Please note that the schedule for SM testing is shown to take three (3) months. This is an approximate break-even point at which SM is likely to be more cost-effective than C/F. The necessity for continuing SM testing beyond the 3-month period should be discussed , approximately two to four weeks prior to the completion of the scheduled testing. Preliminary design criteria and cost data described herein will be developed independent of testing duration. May 24,2006 A-3, , c:\GilIog1y\01 .' Projects\STPUD_TETG\STPUD.BOI\7433aOO (Al'8enic)\Contrects\Phese II\ATS P2. EXHIBIT A. Scope.;.3.doc .34- EXHIBIT B SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ARSENIC TREATMENT STUDY LABOR HOUR AND COST PROPOSAL (PHASE 2) TASK DESCRIPTION • -,151 11: ESTIMATED LABOR HOURS OTHER DIRECT COSTS p sa m a, "`111 o i- p a , Ash Vakharkar Larry Rupp p x CAD Technician a a 3 Total Hours Travel and Subsistence Pilot Equipment Shipment & Rental Testing Materials Analytical Supplies and Fees Project Equipment Communication Expense _o 0 Other Direct Costs 8 0 o '-- Classification PIC PM PE E QA/OC QA/OC OAIOC CAD WP ■ $8.50/hr Ho Rate 8215 180 $115 $115 5180 8180 180 $90 $77 Task 1- Pilot Testing 1.1 Mobilization and Setup (CIF Equipment) 1.2 Testing (C/F Equipment) 1.3 Mobilization and Setup (SM Equipment) 1.4 Testing (SM Equipment) 1.5 Demobilization Jr {{ 'v! [ qtr.:,--31,,m) Task 2 - Arsenic Treatment Study Report 2.1 Data Analysis/Repoli VNiting 2.2 DistrlcUCaDHS Coordination & Review Response --III-!, 1Y „�ka,1d Y:, '�p)l', Task 3 - Project Management & Meetings 3.1 Project Tracking (Schedule, Budget, Resources, Progress) 3.2 Meetings - CaDHS (Plot Protocol, Pilot Resuka) 3.3 Meetings - District (Progress Review, Workshop) 3.4 Progress Reports L 1� -��6 I,i1ir1`,.".�`T TOTAL HOURS 2 1 �yr 1 8 2 ,�:�_., 2 2 2 2 20 18 t 3 16 18 12 .:'�' 24 136 2 4 18 40 6 2 .� 4 1, i 40 24 2 2 2 16 20 8 4 0 -r :.=,It r 1Y. #; "` d " ;5 t6' � ,tea.. 7 8 8 16 10 18 � ? , T '.I. ..i.,,, ""t�.xA* +M' .$480 , :�4 1 $7,000 59,500 5800 $420 519,200 $1,000 r=T �i � �C 5220 52,000 81.190 850 $2,500 $540 Fq$20 aic1 l � 51,090 $310 - .t ,-,� j� 590 8270 $480 $260 i k,.�,L A91=41'.�i:, 04,500 84,520 83,100 $220 $3,320 818,400 820,490 $36,890 $800 550 $850 S7,900 $23,880 531,560 $500 .$700 yc�$'y20.py 0 e y • 1 . a�¢.��Y� Y4 te 515,500 81,090 ;16,590 85,400 $310 $5,710 1? a,)-'# � .1Y ,,..- .,a 81,300 $90 51,390 $4,400 81,330 $5,730 87,700 81,680 59,380 $3,800 $280 $4,060 r� ll �: �[kc��lf :. .kl^t' $86,500 $49,850 5115,160 ��. 81.060 $1,200 �'fl i�,: if $10,160 CAROLLO ENGINEERS, PC FEE SCHEDULE (2006) Engineers/Scientists Assistant Professional Professional Project Professional Lead Project Professional Senior Professional Technicians Technicians Senior Technicians Support Staff Word Processing / Clerical Project Equipment Communication Expense (PECE) Per DL Hour Other Direct Expenses Travel and Subsistence Mileage Subconsultant Other Direct Cost Expert Witness Hourly Rate $115.00 150.00 180.00 195.00 215.00 90.00 130.00 77.00 8.50 at cost .445/mile cost + 10% cost + 10% Rate x 2.0 This fee schedule is subject to annual revisions due to labor adjustments. H:\CllentlSTPUD_BOI\7433aOO (Arsenlc)\Contracts\Phase I~TS P2 . EXHIBIT C . Fee Schedule.doc -36- Task Name Duration Jul 2006 'August 2006 tember 2006 'October 2006 'November 2006 'December 2006 jJanuary 20C ___LSe /2 7/2 7/9 7/167/237/30j 8/6 OM 38/208/279/3 9/109/179/2410/110/810/110/210/2 Phase II 134 days 1141./1,11/1!1/2 12/3 2/1 2/1 2/2 2/3 1/7 1/14 h • Task 1 - Pilot Testing 90 days Ilk 11-; ,...,,„_;::,-- ';;ri'...A';:.4. ..w.- 4.'- ';',..4—. Mobilization and Setup (CIF Equipment) • 3 days Testing (CIF Equipment) : 17 days Mobilization and Setup (SM Equipment) 4 days Testing (SM Equipment) i 64 days Demobilization 2 days Task 2- Arsenic Treatment Study Report . 131 days 1 i ; Data Analysis/Report Writing 93 days i Review (District) 10 days ■ . ; ; ; District Review Response 5 days , • , Review (CaDHS) 15 days Report (Final) , 7 days Task 3 - Project Management 129 days I 1 , 11 ;I 1 . , ! 1 : • C • • 0 , ai a 0 El ij LI 0 I 0' LI A I Management - Schedule, Budget, Resources, Progre -123 days Meeting - Pilot Protocol (CaDHS) 1 day Meeting - Project Progress Review (District) 1 day Workshop - Project Study (District) 1 day Meeting - Pilot Results (CaDHS) 1 day Updates - Project Progress 115 days Project:Arsenic Project Schedule (rev Date: VVed 5/24/08 Task ' = ,,-; ";, ;,-; Milestone External Tasks Split —.....„ Summary External Mileston0 Progress I' Project Summary v Deadline in Page 1 General Mana~"r RIchard H. Soll>rig South Tahoe ..Public UtiHty District Direccors Tom Comte James R. Jone5 Mary Lou M05bacher Duane Walla", Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474- Fax 530 541-0614. www.stPUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 g. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Geo-Referencing Survey - Phase III REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Task Order No. 1-A between the District and Consultant (Auerbach Engineering Corporation), thereby adding $8,040.00 to the total for Purchase Order No. P16743. DISCUSSION: In October 2005, the Board approved a proposal from Auerbach Engineering in the amount of $25.000.00 to provide surveying services as outlined in their cost estimate dated September 13, 2005. These services were requested to locate and provide point location information for up to 173 selected sewer and water utility assets within the District service area. In February 2006, $3,943.75 was added to the PO total for the cost of surveying 26 assets added to the project scope. Auerbach completed the Geo-referencing survey with delivery of the final point location files in February 2006. During the conduct of this work, additional crew time was required to complete the survey due to unforeseen circumstances encountered in the field. These included: 1) lost crew time to find selected assets shown in the plans, that . could not be located in the field; 2) added crew time to find substitute assets that could be surveyed in the field; 3) added crew time to tie-in located assets using conventional survey methods, where GPS methods were proposed; and 4) added crew time due to intermittent GPS signal connection, during surveying. Staff believes that the May 2. 2006 request from Auerbach Engineering is reasonable, although should have been submitted in a timely manner. Approval of this budget increase will allow this p~oject to be closed. -39- Bergsohn June 1, 2006 Page 2 SCHEDULE: Not time sensitive COSTS: $8,040.00 ACCOUNT NO: 2037-8446/GISSFT BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $35,649 ATTACHMENTS: STPUD Georeferencing Project, Auerbach Engineering Corporation dated May 2, 2006 CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO CATEGORY: Water -40- .... ..... : '. :~-'-:- ., ,. .... . .'. . ,. ".' '::, ,.:~{~~~~gI?i::r'" ,X "!::;"~'~~i, >' , - ' " . . ' , :.. AUERBACH ENGINEERING CORPORATION . CIVIL ENGINEERING .'LAND SURVEYING · ENVIRONMENTAL PLANN'ING ,~ROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING .. -,,"'. . , May 2, 2006 Project No.: 71.01 Mr. Ivo Bergsohn, PG CHg South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA96150 Subject: STPUD Georeferencing Project Dear Mr. Bergsohn: As you, are aware; Auerbach Engineering Col1?oration (AEC) has completed the Sou'th Tahoe , Public Utility District (STPUD) Georeferencing Project (Project). As we have also discussed on the phone, the Project budget was exceeded due to several elements beyond our control. This , correspondence is a formal request for a budget amendment to address those elements. We offer the following informafion for your cOnsideration in that regard.' , , The additional work required to complete the Project to the satisfaction of the STPUD falls into four major categories. These categories and a brief explanation are summarized below: Item No. 1 - Assets Not Field Located. During the course of the Project,' the survey field crew was unable to field locate a number of STPUD assets. For example, STPUD staff provided "As- Built" plans of the Export Line UB" Phase 2 pipeline with the intent of field locating the access manholes. The field crew searched extensively in areas shown on the plans for these assets but was unable to verify their locations. Table 1 presents additional information as to the additional costs associated with the field time spent searching for these assets. , ' , Item No. 2 - Locate Alternative Assets. This task included the redirection of the field surVey crew to locate alternative assets in lieu of the assets that could not be located under Item No.1. ' " However, when the alternative assets were searched for in the field, the crew was unable to '...:Iocate them as well. For example, the "As-Built" plans for the Export Line "A" Phase 2,access . manholes were shown on the plans but the crew was umilble to fieid locate them. Table 2 provides information as to the additional costs associated with the field time spent searching for these assets. Item No. 3 - Conventional Tie-In of Assets. In a number of locations within the Project area, the Global Positioning .System (GPS) equipment would not receive clear signals due to tree cover. While it was anticipated that we would not be able to use the e~uipment in all locations for that reason, it turned out to be a far larger impact than anticipated. Therefore, the survey crew utilized conventional survey equipmentto a much larger degree to tie-in the required assets. Table 3 provides information as to the additional costs associated with utilizing conventional survey equipment to locate these assets. P.O. sox 5399 . 3092 NORTH LAKE BLVO. . TAHOE CITY. CALIF'ORNIA 96145 VOICE 15301 581-1 1 16 . F'AX 15301 581-3162 . www.AUERSACHENGINEERING.COM -41- Mr. Ivo Bergsohn, PG CHg South Tahoe Public Utility District May 2, 2006 Page 2 of 2 . ,,' :"'. ".. .:~~.~". !.~~~.. .~. ........,.. . c.. ~~i." ;,';, >~- :)~ \:i- ..;,:~,;: ,"j~'~~;i~,~';,-, , \', . .. .,,';.._.. ," , ' ~ c""\':' .: .. " " ,.;, . " '... " . ..' .' '. . . Item No.4 - Intermittent GPS Signal. In the course of locating assets irrthe airport area', the GPS equipment experienced intermittently poor radio connections'. ,This w~sUkely cue tora~io interference associated with the airport itself. These intermittent r.a~io links created difficulty keeping the equipment linked to the satellites. While this is a risk.that ~as partly anticipated, its' severity was particularly frustrating. The field crew had to move 'the base, station several times before the signal links became reliable enough to work with. Table 4 presents the time and costs associated with these efforts. , , - " We understand that requests for additional budget should be initiated prior to actually , expending the funds. However, as the Project field ~ork was continuing into a tim~ of unstable weather, we elected to complete the field work as quickly as possible, and did not tally the , , . ,', . consequences until after the field work was completed. We apologize for this inconvenience. We respectfully request that STPUD review the provided information and approve the budget' increase request for a total of $8,040. Should you have any questions and/or require additional- , information please contacf us at 530.581.1116. Very truly yours, AUERBACH ENGINEERING CORPORATION ftHf~ Keith Masuda, PE PLS Survey Project Ma "Yalter R. Auerbach, P.E. President WRAiwa Enclosures J:\0071.01 \Doc's\OO71.01_IBergsohn_BudgetRequest.doc -42- .... .... . . ~;>" .,' .~ ' '" .~. , ' '" ; ,( '. " South Tahoe PubJi Utility Ositrict" . - Asset Georeferencing Project " BUDGET INCREASE REQUEST SUMMARY . " - " Table 1 ' . Item No.1. Aslets Not Field Located " Employee Hours Hourly Total Date 10 S-nt Rate Cost ' Delcrlotlon , ' 10/1212005 65 1 $90 $90 Searched for MH40 Q-20 , ' . 10/14/2005 65 2 $90 $180 Searched for AMH's 27+00 & 60+50 " 10/2612005 65 2 $90 $180 Searched for MH53 & MH64 J-25 " . 10/26/2005 65 2 $90 $180 Searched for 'Heavenly' control point " 11n /2005 65 3 $90 $270 Searched for MW2, MW7, AMH 72+76 & 80+50, 11/11/2005 61 1 $190 $190 Searched for MH28 K-24 11/1412005 65 3 $90 $270 Searched for 'Luther Pasl' control point, AMH 100+50 & 142+00 11/1512005 65 4 $90 $360 Searched for AMH'I Export Une B Phil 11/17/2005 65 4 $90 $360 Searched for AMH's Export Une B Phil 11/2912005 61 3 5190 5573 Searched for AMH's Export Une BPhll. AMH 24+50 & 29+00 ExportUne A Phil 12/512005 40 1 $190 $190 Searched for AMH,24+50 & 29+00 Export Une A Phil Sub - Totat 26 $2,840 Table 2 '. , Item No.2- Locate Alternative As..te " Employee Hours Hourly Total Oat. 10 S-nt Rate, Cost Delcrlotlon 11/4/2005 61 1 5190 5190 Reset Altematlve 'Heavenly' control 11/21/2005 65 2 $90 5180 Searched for Aller AMH's Export Line A Phil' 11/21/2015 61 2 5190 5380 Searched for Alter AMH's Export Line A Phil 11/2212015 61 . 3 5190 5570 Reset Alternative 'Luther Pasl' control 11/2212005 65 1 $90 $90 Searched for Alter MW TeF-1 11/2212005 65 2 $90 $180 Searched for Alter AMH'I Export Line A Phil 11/2212005 61 2 5190 5380 Searched for Alter AMH's Export Line A Phil Sub - Total 13 51,970 Table 3 Item No.3 - Conventional Tle"n of As.ete Employee Hours Hourly Total ' , Date 10 Silent Rat. Co.t De.crllltlon " 11/18/2005 61 1 $190 $190 Set control for Gren Lake Rd MW 11/21/2005 61 1 $190 $190 AMH'I 40+50 & 56+50 Export Line B Phi 12/9/2005 40 1 $190 $190 Grell Lake Rd MW; LP-1, Lp-2 & EX-1 12/12/2005 40 2 $190 $380 Arrowhead Ave MW: SW-1, 1W-1 & OW-1 12/1212005 40 5 $190 $!l50 Set ~ntrcl; Clement, liendGr'Son, MW1, MI.'V3. MW5, MV'/8. MWO, PSW1 ::. pm,".':! 12/13/2005 40 1 $190 $380 Set control for Sioux 5t MW , . " Sub - Total 11 $2,280 " - . Tabl. 4 Item No.4-Intermittent GPS Signal Employee Hours Hourty Total Date 10 S-nt Rate Cost Delcrllltlon $380 Relocated Base . , 12/5/2005 40 2 $190 1216/2005 40 1 $190 5190 AMH 99+93 Export Line A Phi 1216/2005 40 2 $190 $380 Relocated Base Sub - Total 5 $950 Total Budget Increase Request $8,040 -43- ... '.' , .."..... ... .' General Mana9l!lr RIchard H. SoI17rig South Tahoe "Public Utility District Directors Tom CoIlTU Jamee R. Jones Mary Lou M0517acher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe' CA 9~150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www.StpUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 4 h. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ivo Bergsohn, Hydro-Geologist MEETING DATE: June 1,2006 . ITEM - PROJECT NAME: South Upper Truckee Well NO.3 Corrosion Control Study REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve proposal from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (KJC) to complete Phase II of the South Upper Truckee Well No.3 Corrosion Control Study (CCS) in an amount not to exceed $90,000 (estimated). DISCUSSION: On February 16, 2006, the Board approved the February 6, 2006, Phase I Proposal from KJC to complete those tasks required to develop a California Department of Health Services (CaDHS) - approved protocol for pilot testing selected corrosion control treatment technologies at the South Upper Truckee Well No.3 (SUT 3). This included reviewing available water quality, operations and preliminary water treatment evaluation reports for the SUT 3, evaluating various corrosion control options and recommending a preferred treatment alternative for pilot testing. The Phase I work is documented in the draft Initial Corrosion Control Technical Memorandum (KJC, 03/31/2006). Phase II includes performance of a Corrosion Control Study (CCS) pilot test and completion of a CaDHS-approved CCS report. Based on the findings of the Phase I data review and treatment technologies evaluation, KJC is recommending that the District conduct a pilot test to collect sufficient engineering systems design data for a full-scale corrosion control treatment (CCT) system using a multi-stage bubble aeration pilot unit and corrosion test loops. The pilot testing will provide the necessary testing data to: 1) determine the efficiency of using an aeration system to remove carbon dioxide, thereby elevating pH, using the District's SUT water supply and'verify equipment sizing requirements; 2) ascertain the relative rates of copper and lead-tin solder corrosion with and without pH control; 3) ascertain the potential for increased steel pipe corrosion rates and corrosion scale release due to the increase of dissolved oxygen; 4) ascertain the effectiveness of a chemical corrosion inhibitor, sodium silicate, on controlling steel corrosion and scale release; and 5) ascertain the effect of radon emissions on air quality. -45- Bergsohn June 1, 2006 Page 2 KJC is proposing to: provide the necessary engineering staff and equipment to conduct a corrosion pilot test; compile and evaluate the collected data; and complete a CaDHS- approved CCS report to allow for the design of a full-scale CCT system. District staff is in the process of evaluating alternatives proposed for Phase II pilot testing. A recommended pilot testing cost proposal detailing scope, budget and schedule will be presented to the Board for approval prior to, and at the June 1, 2006 Board Meeting. SCHEDULE: June 2006 through December 2006 (anticipated) COSTS: Not to exceed $90,000.00 (estimated) ACCOUNT NO: ' 2029-8463/RWSUTR BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: $1,033,063 ATTACHMENTS: South Upper Truckee Well No.3 Corrosion Control Study (CCS) Phase II - Scope of Work and Budget (to be provided). CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO CATEGORY: Water -46- 26 May 2006 ~"ck~t' to A 5 ~~^ '-\ "t \.e...'\ Y ~ fo-\.o~ M~ Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Engineers & Scientists 5190 Neil Road Suite 210 Reno, Nevada 89502 n5-827-7900 FAX n5-827-7925 Mr. Ivo Bergsohn, P.G" Hg Hydro-Geologist South Tahoe Public Utility District 1275 Meadow Crest Drive South Lake Tahoe, California 96150 Subject: South Upper Truckee Well No.3, Corrosion Control Study Phase II - Scope of Work and Budget South Tahoe Public Utility District K1J Reference R05018 Dear Mr. Bergsohn: This proposal was prepared to provide the South Tahoe Public Utility District (District) with a scope of work and budget for Phase II of South Upper Truckee Well No.3 Corrosion Control Study. Phase I of the South Upper Truckee (SUT) Well NO.3 Corrosion Control Study consisted of evaluating corrosion control technologies, recommending a preferred technology and developing a pilot testing protocol. Phase II of the project consists of implementing the pilot testing and developing a summary report for submission to the California Department of Health Services (CaDHS). This proposal provides the scope of work and budget to pilot test a Deep Bubble Multi-Stage Aeration pilot unit available from Lowry Equipment and to prepare the Corrosion Control Report. The pilot testing is intended to provide the following information: · Efficiency of aeration system at removing carbon dioxide and elevating pH (confirm ability to achieve desired pH using the District's SUT water supply and verify equipment sizing requirements). · Relative rates of copper and lead-tin soldier corrosion with and without pH control (necessary information for the development of a corrosion control plan to be submitted to CaDHS), · Potential for increased steel pipe corrosion rates and corrosion scale release due to the increase of dissolved oxygen (verify and qualify potential negative affects of aeration). · Effectiveness of a chemical corrosion inhibitor, sodium silicate, on controlling steel corrosion and scale release, . Effect of radon emissions on air quality. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Mr. Ivo Bergsohn, P.G., Hg South Tahoe Public Utility District 26 May 2006 Page 2 Scope of Work The work Kennedy/Jenks proposes to complete during Phase II of the Corrosion Control Study is described below. Task 1 - Project Management The objective of this task is to establish the necessary procedures to satisfy the administrative, financial reporting, and billing requirements. At the start of Phase II, Kennedy/Jenks' project manager will develop a project memorandum which provides each team member their assigned tasks, budget, schedule, ac requirements, and deliverables. Kennedy/Jenks' project manager will prepare monthly management reports detailing the work, budget and schedule progress, problems and delays encountered during the study. The management reports will follow the format provided by the District. Task 2 - Pilot Testing (1 to 3 Months) Kennedy/Jenks will install a Deep Bubble Multi-Stage Aeration pilot unit at the SUT well site with the District's assistance. It is assumed the District will arrange for any required permits. It is also assumed the District will provide an electrician to make necessary electrical connections and a pipe fitter to assist in the installation of the pilot unit and pipe taps to the supply piping and connections to the sanitary sewer and install and repair, as necessary, penetrations through the existing wellhouse walls. The pilot system will be equipped with steel, copper, lead-tin soldier, and galvanized steel linear polarization probes; a 50-foot coil of copper tubing; and a 10-foot section of existing steel distribution piping (provided by the District). These features are described in the Piloting Alternatives Memorandum. The existing steel distribution piping used in the pilot test should be collected from an area of the distribution system that receives regular flow rather than a "dead end" part of the system with stagnate water conditions. There will be three test loops. One loop will be a control loop and will receive chlorinated water. The second loop will receive chlorinated and aerated water. The third loop will receive water treated by chlorination, aeration and a corrosion inhibitor (sodium silicate). The scope includes up to three months of pilot testing. However, after four weeks of pilot testing, the data obtained will be reviewed to evaluate the need for further testing. If the data indicates that little additional information would be obtained in continuing the pilot test, Kennedy/Jenks will recommend terminating the pilot test. This review and data evaluation will be performed once each week following the initial review until it has been determined that sufficient data has been obtained or until three months of pilot testing have elapsed. During piloting, a number of sample analyses will need to be conducted including pH, carbon dioxide, dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, lead, copper, iron, radon, turbidity, color and conductivity, as well as making linear polarization measurements. Kennedy/Jenks will provide Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Mr. Ivo Bergsohn, P.G., Hg South Tahoe Public Utility District 26 May 2006 Page 3 the linear polarization instrument and probes. It is assumed District staff will normally conduct the analytical tests and measurements (other than radon) using District supplies and equipment. Kennedy/Jenks will provide training on the use of the linear polarization instrument, if needed, and will provide support to the District staff. At completion of the pilot test, the linear polarization probes will be analyzed for scale composition, weight loss, and pitting. Following completion of the pilot testing, Kennedy/Jenks, with District assistance, will remove the pilot testing equipment and return the pilot unit to the manufacturer. The District will provide a fork lift and assist with the unloading and loading of the aeration unit. A 4-week test would predict copper and mild steel corrosion rates with an approximate accuracy of 75 percent and 40 to 50 percent, respectively. Extending the test to 12 weeks should increase the accuracy of copper corrosion and suppression predictions to approximately 90 percent and for steel approximately 80 percent. Task 3 -Radon Monitoring In support of the radon monitoring, Kennedy/Jenks will obtain appropriate wind speed and direction data (Rose Diagram) for the site. Kennedy/Jenks will collect six samples of airborne radon during the pilot test. Three samples will be collected upwind of the air stripping unit to provide an indication of background conditions; one sample will be collected at the pilot unit's air outlet; one sample will be collected 20 feet downwind of the air outlet; and the last sample will be collected at the property boundary downwind of the air outlet. Kennedy/Jenks will prepare a technical memorandum describing the monitoring methods, wind data, and sampling results. The District will be provided a draft copy for review and comment. Kennedy/Jenks will finalize the memorandum, incorporating the District's comments. Task 4 -Corrosion Control Treatment Report Kennedy/Jenks will evaluate the data generated in the pilot testing program and prepare a Corrosion Control Treatment Report conforming to CaDHS requirements. As required by CaDHS, the report will include: . Evaluation of the effectiveness of alkalinity and pH adjustment, calcium and hardness adjustment, and corrosion inhibitor addition. . An analysis of the pilot testing results and documentation of the treatment in analogous systems, and data for the water quality parameters monitored during testing. . Identification of the effects of corrosion control inhibitor. . A cost evaluation of the alternatives, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Mr. Ivo Bergsohn, P.G., Hg South Tahoe Public Utility District 26 May 2006 Page 4 . Evaluation of the alternatives based on reliability, aesthetics, and energy use. . A recommended corrosion control treatment plan and supporting rational. Kennedy/Jenks will submit three copies of a draft report for the District's review. Kennedy/Jenks will meet with the District to discuss the draft report and receive comments for incorporation into the final report. Six copies of the final report will be submitted. Kennedy/Jenks will address CaDHS technical review questions. Budget Kennedy/Jenks proposes a budget of $81 ,800 for Phase II of the Corrosion Control Study project. For the purposes of this proposal, it was assumed that the pilot testing will extend for three months. A breakdown of the proposed budget, showing labor hours, equipment, travel, and other direct expenses, is provided in the Proposal Fee Estimate table (attached). The hourly labor rates are based on Kennedy/Jenks' 2006 Schedule of Charges. Schedule Kennedy/Jenks will begin working on the above work as soon as the District issues a task order for Phase II of the Corrosion Control Study. A proposed schedule for the remainder of the Corrosion Control Study is attached. If the above scope of work and budget are acceptable to the District, please issue a task order for this work under the existing Master Services Agreement between Kennedy/Jenks and the District. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call me at (775) 827-7900 or Milt Larsen at (253) 874-0555. Very truly yours, KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS GEG/pkh Enclosure Proposal Fee Estimate One- to Three-Month Plot with Sodium Silicate Addition - Three Loop System Jab Rena: TRW) Cvivlen Cebd 504/x- Plural! Jab D.aailpIda Pat ns M l0Sbp Dap 91550 Malian Spam hams... 111.4/10 0.99006- 94/94ItupaOelan Kennedy /Jenks Consultants January 1,NOS Raba 4F1aa.M.IIar..... Mealy Ralc Frralal-_ 1900 5509 E•04a. Spa• AW 6•049,- 50ac7 h15 INV"' • 61-x- Spas Spa 5 7/00 $100 nn »4 $121 64S.'-.. 641• Spa 59.02 1714 11• 969-501- Spsc1 116 '. Drlr...,- Sr Tech 5103 CAD 25df '511 P.O.' Main 011 Rhin *.ant - 011 46 IN Taal tl.un Taal labor Cab RIJ Miami Caw 602 ..... Dird Cpb Srlb- eenb.0 Ca4a Tal4/ Cwt T•11 •44406 50041/48764 ... &Mat 11 Paned Canto dlon __... Srba4/r 1.2 Pawl Ms.. __. • 17 11 .. ] - • • .. _ 1 7 A 25 la .... 53r!45 $4,133 10 19 53000 15,033 TM I- S4Sbbl 6 20 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 45 57,0]1 50 1910 50 $,571 Task 2. P101 Trblr Scab* 2.1141m and 954.6 1 4 20 10 24 _ 105 20 314120. $3,152 1500 175.150 131,320 03,152 SAM* 2.2 Red4asy. Task 2.SW44 12 20 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 322272 . 1500 575,710 50 $41,472 TW ]. Raler 14401d391 1 12 13 31 3116 1250 17,506 Tao3 -5.166 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 51 31111 50 $210 10 51021 74.4 CeraeeI Ceba*Tra4ra4 18 e 110 _.... • - 14 2 4 144 16 024,50. 33,316. 524.562 53316 Roped S01•49 41 Pra}ae Report Stark 4 CaOl9 Rot* Tak4 -5. .0 24 100 0 0 0 D 0 16 0 10 0 0 4 0 162 524176 10 10 10 021,076 41 Tasks Taal 42 111 0 0 0 2 0 155 a 10 a '. 0 0 0 414 $a 414 55011 111,0 11 50 574.250 wJ Cal010.s1e. %102 Wrkrp: 10% 51,111 50 51,511 GRAND TOTAL 501,000 PHASE II - CORROSION CONTROL STUDY SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ID Task Name • Duration Start Finish June July August. _ September October , November December January February _ March 5/28.6/4 16/11 6/18 625. 7/2 7/9'7/16,7/23_7 /30 8/8 8/13.8/208/27 9/3 9/10 9/17 9/2410/110/8; 0/1 0/2 0/2 11/5 1/1 1/11/2 12/3 2/1 ' 2/1 2/2'2/3 1/7 1/14.1/21 1/28 2/4'2/11 2/182 /25 3/4. 1 Phase 1 -Task 3 17 days Thu 611106 Fri 6/23/06 2 Finalize Technical Memo 17 days Thu 6/1/06 Fri 6/23/06 I 3 Phase 1- Task 4 47 days Thu 6 /1 /06 Fri 8/4106 ............_. 4 Prepare Testing Protocol 17 days Thu 6 /1 /06 Fri 6/23/06 5 Review 10 days Mon 6/26/06 Fn 7/7/06 6 CaDHS Review 20 days Mon 7/10/06 Fn 8/4/06 7 Phase 11- Task 1 91 days Mon 7/31/06 Mon 1214106 8 Project Management 91 days Mon 7 /31/06 Man 12/4/06 , 9 Phase 11- Task 2 91 days Mon 7 /10/06 Mon 11 /13106 , 10 Order Aeration Unit 15 days Mon 7 /10/06 Fn 728/06 __........... 11 Obtain Equipment and Supplies 10 days Mon 7/24/06 Fri 8/4/06 12 Build Loops 8 days Wed 8/2/06 Fn 8/11/06 13 Install and Setup Pilot System 5 days Mon 8/14/06 Fri 8/18/06 14 Run Pilot System 21 days Mon 8/21/06 Mon 9/18/06 15 Run Pilot System (Alternate) 61 days Mon 821/06 Mon 11 /13/06 16 Phase 5 - Task 3 4 days Mon 8/26/06 Thu 8/31/06 .1...._. 17 Radon Monitoring 4 days Mon 8/28/06 Thu 8/31/06 18 Phase 11- Task 4 81 days Fri 9/22/06 Fri 1/12/07 19 Analysis of Probes 16 days Fn 9/22/06 Fn 10/13/06 20 Review Data 20 days Mon 9/25/06 Fri 10/20/06 21 Prepare Draft Report 20 days Mon 10/23/06 Fri 11/17/06 22 Review 10 days Man 11/20/06 Fn 12/1/06 23 CaDHS Review 21 days Mon 12/4 /06 Mon 1/1/07 24 ' Finalize Report 9 days Tue 12/07 Fri 1/12/07 25 Phase 0 • Task 4 (Alternate) 81 days Fri 11/17/06 Fri 3/9/07 26 Analysis a/ Probes 16 days Fri 11/17/06 Fri 12/9/06 27 ' Review Data 20 days Mon 11/20/06 Fri 12/15/06 28....! Prepare Draft Report 20 days Mon 12/18/06 Fri 1/12/07 29 - -- District Review 10 days Mon 1/15/07 Fri 126/07 30 CaDHS Review 21 days Mon 129/07 Mon 226/07 31 Finalize Report 9 days Tue 2/27/07 Fn 319/07 I Project: Phase II Schedule.mpp Date: Fri 5/26/06 Task Split Progress Milestone • • Summary Project Summary ^J > External Tasks External Milestone Deadline • Page 1 !.:-~fJ, Consen't.L~ y.j ~/)}/ ~h' , ;i ii.',otjlf;, "'" t;"q'f.' I r' ;: l,l,h, . · QQllPl9; . . 4: Itfll) tflZ ' f t;' ': ,.' .;: i,A~!J 'J)' <:'1 :~ '::110/ ~... , ~~~L lJ Richard Solbrig, General Manager Paul Sciuto, Assistant Manager Eric SC,hafer, President Tom Comte, Director BOARD MEMBERS Duane Wallace, Vice President James Jones, Director Mary Lou Mosbacher, Director , PUBLIC MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT 'MAY 4, 2006 MINUTES The Board of Directors of the, South Tahoe Public Utility District met for a Public Meeting on May 4,2006.6:00 p.m., at the Barton Memorial Hospital's Board Room, 2170 South Avenue. South Lake Tahoe., BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Directors Comte. Mosbacher, Schafer, Jones. Director Wallace was absent. ROLL CALL STAFF: Mary AlsburY. Dennis Cocking, Debbie Henderson. Rhonda McFarlane, Susan Rasmussen. Paul Sciuto, Richard Solbrig. GUESTS: None. A presentation was planned to present information on the 2006/07 Fiscal Year Budgets for the Sewer and Water Enterprise Funds and gather input from the public., Since no public attended, Rhonda McFarlane and Paul Sciuto gave a brief sum'mary of the budget and long-term financial plans, which includes a rate increase of 4% for both the Sewer , and Water Enterprise Funds., 2006/07 FISCAL YEAR BUDGETS: SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND AND WATER ENTERPRISE FUND -47- PUBLIC M.EETING MINUTES - MAY 4. 2006 PAGE-2 No Board action was taken. 6.35 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Eric Schafer, Board President South Tahoe Public Utility District ATTEST: Kathy Sharp, Clerk of the Board South Tahoe Public Utility District By: Susan Rasmussen Finance Administrative Assistant -48- General Mana!:)l!:r Richard H. Solbrig . South .Tahoe Public Utility District Directors Tom Comu James R. Jones Mary Lou Mosbacher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe' CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474' Fax 530 541-0614' www.stPUd.U5 ' BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7 a. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Randy Curtis, Manager of Field Operations MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: 716 Clement Street, APN: 23-502-43 REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Approve Sewer Main Extension at District's Cost DISCUSSION: Property owner Thomas Rusinko paid his fees on November 18, 2005, to build a new single-family dwelling located at 716 Clement Street. At that time, Mr. Rusinko was unaware that the sewer main on Clement Street stopped approximately fifty-feet (50) short of his property. Mr. Rusinko discovered this when attempting to locate his sewer lateral this year at the beginning of the building season. It appears that some time ago, one large parcel was subdivided into three parcels. One of those parcels is served off the sewer main on 13th Street, the other off of the sewer main on Clement Street. His parcel, located in the middle of the split lot, does not have a sewer main in the street to serve his project needs. Staff would like to recommend that the Board of Directors approve a sewer main extension, paid for by the District, to serve this property, as the property owner was not informed of this situation at the time he paid his fees. Additionally, staff does not feel that this action would be precedent-making as this is a unique situation and most, if not all, of the District's service area is currently served by an existing sewer main. District staff will perform the work so in addition to labor and equipment the project will be at'proximately $3,000 in materials and paving costs. In addition, the Customer Service representatives are verifying a sewer main is in place for all future connections. Any future properties identified that do not have a sewer main will be referred to Engineering. Staff expects this to be a rare situation. -49- Curtis June 1, 2006 Page 2 SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: Unbudgeted. Funding for the work will come from the capital outlay reserve. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Recommendation Memo CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ ~~ ' NO CATEGORY: Sewer -60- South Tahoe Public Utility District Memorandum " DATE: May 12,2006 TO: Paul Sciuto, Assistant General ManagerlEngineer FROM: Randy Curtis, Manager ofField Operations SUBJECT: 716 Clement APN: 23-502-43 At your request, I have reviewed the infonnation provided regarding the proposed development located at 716 Clement. Property owner Thomas Rusinko submitted plans and paid connection fees on November 18,2005 to build a single-family dwelling on this parcel. .' With the start of this year's building season, the District discovered that there is no sewer main available to serve his property. The closest main is approxnnately fifty (50) feet from his parcel. It appears that some time ago, one large parcel was subdivided into three parcels. One of those parcels is served off of the main at 13th Street and the other off of the main on Clement. For some unknown reason, the sewer main was not extended to the 13th Street main, as is the norm. Because the property owner was not infonned on November 18, 2005 that there was no sewer main to serve his property and because the main stogs just short of his property rather than running the remaining length of Clement to 13 Street, I believe that the District., at it's own expense, should extend the sewer main to serve his project. It is a rare occurrence, and will not likely occur very often. I realize that we do require property owners to extend water mains at their own expense if there is no main to serve their property, however, those property owners have a choice of installing a well to serve their property. Mr. Rusinko does not have any other options with sewer (in other words, he doesn't have the choice of installing a septic tank). , Again, I believe it is in the best interest of the District and its customers to, extend the main fifty (50) feet on Clement, at its own expense, to serve this property. '..51.. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL June 1, 2006 Payroll 5/24/06 Total Payroll BNY Western Trust Company Cost Containment - health care payments LaSalle Bank Hatch & Parent - legal services Total Vendor EFT Accounts Payable Checks Sewer Fund Accounts Payable Checks Water Fund Accounts Payable Checks Self-funded Ins Accounts Payable Checks Grant Funds Total Accounts Payable Grand Total Pavroll EFTs & Checks EFT AFLAC Medical & Dependent Care EFT CA Employment Taxes & W/H EFT Federal Employment Taxes & WIH CHK CalPERS Contributions EFT John Hancock Pension Loan Pmts EFT Great West Deferred Comp CHK Stationary Engineers Union Dues' EFT United Way Contributions EFT Employee Direct Deposits CHK Employee Paychecks Adjustments T ota/ 5/24/06 1,692.55 13,685.49 76,814.89 20,262,28 4,010.43 13,402.21 1,968.32 92.00 163,365.33 18,498.56 0.00 313,792.06 -53- 313,792.06 313,792.06 867,636.20 52,802.52 156,572.80 0.00 1,077,011.52 170,658.25 1,683,993.65 0.00 0.00 1,854,651.90 3,245,455.48 00 South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006- 06/01/2006 zia. TH.T, MAY 25, 2006, 2:54 PM - -mq: THERESA---leg: 361920 #J008- - -wog: Q 09 <1.07r -repot id: Cla Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: Mnl, i-1W, RV, VH Venc r I■L3t9 Aoocumt # Department AEAP AFLAC 10 -21 -4830 AIIMINISIRATICN 20 -21 -4830 ALMINISMAITCN 10 -00 -2538 GENERAL AL & CN A P G ANALYTICAL PRTxJCT GRZI P 10 -07 -4760 LARCRATCRY 20 -07 -4760 LABOATCRY • Pte- PACIFIC 20 -38 -6520 CUSICMER NICE 10 -38 -6520 CLb1t'ER SERVICE ALPFN SIERRA COFFEE OZMPANY 10 -00 -6520 COAL & ALMINISTRATTCN 20 -00 -6520 GENERAL & AIMINISIRATTCN ALSEIRY, JAY 10 -04 -6073 HEAVY MINIENWIE ARI,LO PLLNi3IM & H N, TEES" S 10 -01 -6052 il\LEFGRaND REPAIR ARA BRK t. IIFCRM SERVICES 10 -00 -2518 (ES L & AEMINISIRATTCN ARCE, DANIEL N RFL CUS FIE F 10 -07 -6200 LABCRAIC Y 20 -07 -6200 LAB:RATCPY' 10 -39 -4920 FINANCE 20 -39 -4920 FIlE Descripticn SUBSCRIPTICNS EXPENSE SaH2IPITCNS EXPENSE Check Total: AFLAC FEE LITCN Check Total: LABC ATCEY SUPPLIES IABCRATCECC SUPPLIES Check Total: aPPLSES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RAIL IDOLS Check Tttal: Check Total: Check Total: PIPE, CCVERS, & MOSES Check Total: Check Total: FRINITM PRINTIM Check Total: Anount Check # Type 19.98 19.97 39.95 00063142 NI 110.00 110.00 00063143 Mai 15.00 15.00 30.00 00063144 MW 380.70 380.70 761.40 00063146 1,167 81.75 81.75 163.50 00063147 NW 53.85. 53.85 00063148 NW 2,550.00 2,550.00 00063149 M'7 1,440.23 1,440.23 00063150 NW 62.00 124.00 00063151 MW 36.66 36.65 South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006-06/01/2006 ]ELT, MNY 25, 2006, 2:54 FM - -I : THERESA -- -leg: GL JL - -lac: QE1'IE - -- -jab: 361920 #0008 -- -wog: 9 <1.07 >- -zepart id: Default Selection: Ci.edc Stc k ID: AP ; CS7eck types: M7,I3I,RV,V11 Ver t r Hare P000u it # Department B S K ANALYITCAL LABS BENILY PLIFEWIDYNAMICE BERRY-HEN= flf SIFZI S BIM MATERIALS BOYLE IENUINEERIM CCRP E JIZ, GAME CWEA 10 -21 -4314 ATMINIMATTCN 20 -39 -4314 FINANCE 10 -00 -2539 COAL & ALMINISTRATICN 10 -29 -4314 II2IlM 20 -29 -4314 EMIlNEE:2IlM 20 -07 -6110 LAECRATCY 10 -06 -6652 OPERATTCPS 10 -00 -0415 GENERAL & ALMINISTRATTCN 20 -01 -6052 LND REPAIR 20 -29 -7049 EN I1.3 10 -28 -6200 D1?I tN) UALIEY RANCH 10 -01 -6250 LITERGUND REPAIR 10 -07 -6250 LABCRAIQ Y 10 -28 -6250 DIPMIND VALLEY RANZH CALIF DEPT CF CORAL SERVICES 10 -37 -7051 INECRKATTCN SYSTEMS D rzipticn Credo Tbtal: ILNN TERM DISABIIZTY, LNICN LQI1T TERM DISABTT I Y, LNICN LLI3 TERM DISABILITY, LNICN LCI3 TEEM DISABII_T'IY, MEN LCM TERM pr.SABI TIY LNICN Mack Total: KNT'ICRIM Crn_& Total: BIOSOLID DIS CS L 035IS Check Total: Check Tbta1: PIPE, COVERS, & DES Check Tbta1: WATERLINE, EMVIEW Check Total: TRA Total: CERITFICATI CATI CERITFICATI Total : :•#: u• • a. a :,DV., u• TELEPH:NE SYSTEM Greco Total: Ana= Check # Type 73.31 00063152 Ma 5.47 5.47 1,438.33 7.89 7.88 1,465.04 00063153 M4 180.00 180.00 00063154 M4 1,581.30 1,581.30 00063155 MAT 4,475.86 4,475.86 00063156 M4 1,096.34 1,096.34 00063157 Mq 6,298.51 6,298.51 00063158 Ma 26.70 26.70 00063159 Mnl. 212.00 100.00 112.00 424.00 00063160 Ma 981.74 981.74 00063161 NW SCUth Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006- 06/01/2006 MU, MaY 25, 2006, 2:54 PM - -req: Tf - -leg: Q, JL - -loc: QEITE--- -scab: 361920 ##J008 - -- -cg: QZ09 <1.07 >-- report id: Lefau1t Selection: Crack Stock ID: AP ; Check 'Pipes: NW, IN, RV, VH Ver Nacre Precunt # Departrrent CALF LEFT CF HE LtLH SERVICES 10 -07 -6650 IABCRATCRY 20 -07 -6650 IABQ?AZCRY CALIF WATER REMPLES CTRL ED 10 -06 -6250 CATICRS CAPITOL WE3CRKS LLC CST FPMI LY MLSSICl`S ccacm, tEMIIS CREEK ENVIRCNNIENIAL IABS CPICESPODTIE PARINERS LLC tAVI LABC RATCR ES E N S REURCES III E113 0414, EILFEN 10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INECEMUICN 20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INECE TICN 10 -21 -6621 ALMINISIRATICN 20 -21 -6621 AtMJNESIRATICN 10 -27 -6200 DISTRICT I ECRMITCN 20 -27 -6200 DISTRICT IlNECEMTTCN 10 -07 -6110 LAECRATCRY 20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INEKIMITTCN 10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INRB4aTCN 20 -07 -6110 LAECRATQtY 10 -27 -4405 DISTRICT INECRMUTCN 20 -27 -4405 DISTRICT IlNEQd"TICN 10 -21 -6200. AEMINISIRATICN Descri.pticn OPFRAT M PERAITS OPERA= PEWITS Check Ibtal: Tbtal: CONTRACTUAL SERVICES C NIRACRAI, SERVICES Check Tbtal: INCENTIVE & RBIC NTITCN PRGR IMENTTVE & RBICNI TCN PRCR Check Total: TRA �CN CN ZRA Check Total: M:II'ICRII3 Check Total: CCNIRA C thIL SERVICES Check Total: CNITC IM Check Total: �� Check Total: Arcunt Check # Type 1,857.50 1,857.50 3,715.00 00063162 M4 95.00 00063163 NW 35.00 35.00 70.00 00063164 t'W 87.50 87.50 175.00 00063165 NW 304.21 304.21 608.42 00063166 NW 670.00 670.00 00063167 NW 2,750.00 2,750.00 5,500.00 00063168 NW 2,555.00 2,555.00 00063169 M4 2,821.40 2,821.40 5,642.80 00063170 MW 65.75 Scuth Tah e P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006- 06/01/2006 ']IU, M4Y 25, 2006, 2:54 AK - -req: 7I A--- -leg: C JL - -loc: C STIE - -- -job: 361920 4J008 - -- prcg: CX509 <1.0 >- -report id: Default Selection: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check 'I es • NW, I-1J, RV, VH Vendor Nam Pooan t # Departrng t ENIPIX I1� . F EEK FREIGHT ?EST FORD QMPANY, CEO G FSCHEMICAL GHDIIC G L I INIERWICNAL - Iii CC). u sr GECERANS 20 -39 -6200 FINANZE 20 -29 -8548 20 -29 -8574 EN3INEERIM 10 -38 -4810 CUSKIvER SERVICE 20 -38 -4810 CIEZCNER SERVICE 20 -02 -6051 PNS 10 -07 -4760 IABCRAZQY 20 -07 -4760 IAB1?ATCRY 10 -00 -2504 GENERAL & AI M E ATTCN 20 -00 -2504 GENERAL & ADMMISIRATICN 10 -07 -4760 20 -07 -4760 10 -07 -4760 I EC RATCRY LABORATORY L 10 -37 -8565 INECRMTCN SYSIEMS 20 -37 -8437 IlTTCN SYSTEMS BAS ER FINIAL SERVICES LLC 10 -38 -5020 CUSIDER SERVICE Das=ipticn TRA Taal: WIRLN, IbJY 50 REND TO BIG LER WELL, BAYVIFIBI Check 'Dotal: PC6I7sLE EXPENSES ECSIPGE EXPENSES Check Zbtal: PUS) STATIONS (hack Tbta1: LABCRA'TCRY SUPPLIES LPBP,ZCFZY SUPPLIES Tbtal : EE Check Tot al: Check Tbtal: LAECRATORY SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES Check Zt�tal: GIS IMPIEMENIMICN SFIVAIR, ARCVIEW Check Tbt al EQUIPMENT RENMILEASE ate' ?truant Check # Type 65.75 131.50 277.20 1,524.60 1,801.80 49.12 49.11 98.23 619.36 619.36 109.02 66.10 175.12 240.98 240.98 481.96 153.08 153.08 415.30 390.00 805.30 2,499.17 1,536.62 4,035.79 122.57 00063171 WI 00063172 MW 00063173 ! 00063175 NW 00063176 MW 00063177 NW 00063180 Mg 00063178 Ma 00063179 M'J Ssuth Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006-06/01/2006 TRU, NAY 25, 2006, 2:54 1::M --xeq: 71113RElk---leg: GL JL--lcc: CNSTIE----jcb: 361920 #J008----prog: U14•9 <1.07>--1epart Ti=•fauflt -lection: Check Stock. BD: AP ; Check Is: 1.44,11W,RV,Vfi Vertr Nave Acciaint # recarthent 20-38-5020 CUSI(244tSERYICE • HIGi SIERRA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10-21-6030 ALMINISMTICN 20-21-6030 .ADIENISTRATICN KILT CE' CALIKRNIA INKLINK SCREEN:113 SERVICES INIERSIMTE SVEN & SUPPLY J geL PRD '<LEEN IIC JAMES, GREG JC1119:N, GARY IZVE WIRE MEDIA PARTNERS 10-05-6011 :141■11gBIRMINT•__*_ REPAIR 10-05-8604 :1•111,*' REPAIR 10-22-6670 IIMANRIMCCRCES 20 -22 -6670 H.MsNREURCES fluQLau 10-00-0425 METAL scAtrausnmaTal 10-00-0421 GENERAL & AEMINISTRATICN 10-39-6074 FINANCE 20-39-6074 FINANCE . 10-02-6200 PUMPS 20-01-4520 Ittli KW IND REPAIR 20-27-6660 DISTRICC INKRWM24 Dascripticn Eaurmwr RENnviEnsE check Itta1: SERVICE OCNIRACIS SERVICE CCNIRICIS Check Tbtal: AUICM3TIVE NEW BCE= (Ye& Ittal: PERECMIEL EXEENSE • PERSONEL EXPENSE ChB& 'Ibtal: SVEN SUPPLIES INVENICRY SEEP SUPPLY DIVENICRY' Check Ibtal: OANITCRIAL SERVICES JANIZCRIAL SERVICES Check Tbtal: TRAVEL/MEETIN3S/ELUCRTICN Check Total: MIX LIAM= CIAIMS Check Tbtal: WATER CENSERCATICN EICPENEE Check Ittal: OINZINV° Arrcunt Check # Type • 122.57 245.14 140.80 140.80 281.60 131.52 44,847.42 44,978.94 63.90 63.90 127.80 664.16 599.69 1,263.85 1,473.50 1,473.50 2,947.00 00063181 M4 00063182 NW 00063183 M4 00063184 M4 00063185 M4 00063186 M4 95.00 • 95.00 00063187 MAI 92.14 92.14 00063188 M4 336.00 336.00 00063190 M4 So th Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006- 06/01/2006 1}U, MAY 25., 2006, 2:54 FM --rag: TES - -1er3: GL JL - -loc: CTSTIE-- - -fob: 361920 #J008 - -- og. 09 <1.07>-- ttlzuL id: Default Selecticn: Check Shock ID: AP ; Check Tines: NW, IN, RV, VH Veil= Nare Amount # Department M W H IABMATCRIES M X LOGIC Il� NC Fes, NC NASIER CARR. SUPPLY CD NC NAMAR, FEEL MID M .NDAIN N1E Ct1vM. 20 -07 -6110 LAECRATCRY 10 -37 -4405 RCN SYSTEMS 10 -39 -6200 FINE 20 -39 -6200 FINAKE 20 -02 -6054 PUMPS 20 -02 -6071 RIPS 20 -01 -6200 LSD REPAIR 20 -01 -6310 LITERGUND REPAIR rEPIME CHEMICAL FLMP (D III 10 -06 -4790 OPERATTCNS NEVADA DIVISION CF 1.L.Rt.b.utY NEVALA GENERATCR SYSTEMS NEWARK IN CNE 0 I AMLYTTCAL 10 -28 -4405 DINVflD VALLEY RPNOi 20 -05 -8685 Ban:RENT REPAIR 10 -03 -6071 ELECIRICAL Sum 10 -29 -8668 End 10 -07 -6200 LAECRATCRY Desc riptia NCNTICRIM Check Total: CC NIRACILAL SERVICES Check Tbta7. : TRA AMENtal REPAIMELIATER TANKS Check Tbta1: TRA /EDUCATTCN Chedc Tttal: TEE PH:NE OMER SUP'PLIE'S Chedt Total: Chedt Tbta1: CCNIRAMAL SERVIIh S Total: REPL 100EW PCRT GENEET 1: MAIN G PANEL, VWIP Check Total: TRAVEL/NEErIl33S/E CUCATTCN Arra mt Check # Type 245.00 245.00 00063191 MW 342.70 342.70 00063192 IvW 21.23 21.23 42.46 00063193 NW 341.02 214.27 555.29 00063194 NW 93.45 93.45 00063195 NW 112.50 112.50. 00063196 NW 1,888.90 1,888.90 00063197 MAI 5,624.18. 5,624.18 00063198 Ma 35,800.00 35,800.00. 00063199 M'1 748.72 1,126.73: 1,875.45 00063200 NW 800.00 South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19 2006 - 06/01/2 . C�Pa ee 7 Tt�J, I'YY 25, 2006, 2:54 RBI - -req: ,-- -leg: GL JL - -1oc: Q STIE - -- -jab: 361920 #7008 - -- -wog: 09 <1.07 > -- i �: Default Select±m: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: 441, RV, VH Verb Nare Account # repamtment 0 I CCRP C FTCE EE POT OFFICE MX - A BOISE CO. R S C EXIFNENr RENAL R SUPPLY CO - FEZ #3210 RADIO SHACK RENO [ A r -OCUR L RICK'S Sv7 T.L E 33I E SERVICE 20 -07 -6200 20 -07 -4760 10 -07 -4760 10 -39 -6081 10 -00 -0428 20 -07 -4820 10 -07 -4820 20 -37 -4820 10 -27 -4820 10 -05 -8621 20 -01 -6052 20 -01 -6071 10 -04 -6042 10 -02 -6051 20 -02 -6051 20 -29 -8548 LAS LA LAB`RATC RY MANCE COAL & ADENISTRATICN LAEC RA1tRY LABCRY INFCEMBATICN SYSIE? S DISTRICr ]LION II�JIE ENr REPAIR IMERGFUND REPAIR REPS BMW MUNIENANCE AMPS PIMPS EN3CNEERILZ 20 -01 -6073 IMERCIRaND REPAIR 10 -04 -6071 HEAVY MaLINIENANZE Descr;T ; cn TRA: LABCRA IAECRATCRY SUPPLIES Check Ibtal: C FTCE SUPPLY ISSUES Cane Tbtal: CEFTCE SUPPLIES fl VFNICRY OFFICE SUPPLIES CFFICE SUPPLIES OF= SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES Check Tbtal: N4NLIFT, =MLA= Check Tbtal: PIPE, CCVERS & MLLES SHOP SUPPLIE§ GUMS Check Tbtal: AMP S] TIQNS Al P STATION Check Total: WIPJ.N, IWY 50 REND Check Ibtal SIAILTO1S SfDP SUPPLIES P3totat Check # Type 800.00 1,600.00 369.60 369.57 739.17 168.51 168.51 751.60. 66.79 66.80 66.81 66.80 1,018.80 58,077.25 58,077.25 2,532.24 35.82 39.13 2,607.19 32.31 32.30 64.61 113.57 113.57 61.20 20.00 00063201 ?VW 00063202 WI 00063203 NW 00063204 NW 00063205 NW 00063174 NW 00063206 NW 00063207 NW South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006-06/01/2006 acrspl T}U, NAY 25, 2006, .2:54 FM - -I : 'IFS - -leg: GL JL - -lcc: CN5TIE - -- -jab: 361920 #3008 -- -wog: 09 <1.07 > - -nit id: Default Selecticn: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: NW, I4n1, RV, VH Vendor Nene Aooauit # Department 10 -28 -6042 DIANEND 'VALLEY RANII 20 -01 -6071 iCDD REPAIR RCES3EIEN OZNIRACTINZ INC 20 -29 -8401 ENTIENEERIM S B C S BC /MCI S C P SCIENCE SG MB TIRES, LES 10 -00 -6320 GENERAL & ALNIINISIRATICN 20 -00 -6320 COAL & AtM NIS]R1A TCN 10 -00 -6310 20 -00 -6310 10 -02 -6310 20 -02 -6310 10 -06 -6310 10 -37 -6310 20 -37 -6310 10 -39 -6310 20 -39 -6310 GENERAL & ALMENISTRATICN GENERAL CLa ELNPS MIES OPERATIONS INECR TICN SYSIFNS INECEMTCN SYSTEM FINANCE FILTNCE 20 -07 -4760 IABQ ATtW 10 -07 -4760 LAB:RATt1ZY 20 -05 -6011 REPAIR 10 -04 -6012 VY SC ENIgTC SPE M: L US SRV Il‘t 20 -07 -4760 IAKRATCRY 10 -07 -4760 IABORATCIU Ee scrit i cn GUMS & MAINIERANCE SFDP StJPPLIDS Check Total: C USICNFR SERVICE C VIER Check Total: SIGNAL CFIS Check Total: TELF'• TELEPEENE TELL r TELEPEENE TELERENE TELERENE Che c 'Ibta1: LABZRATC RY SUPPLIES IABCRATCRY SUPPLIES CUEdc Total: AUICKTITVE MBErchedc Tbta7.: LABCRA'ICW &1 LAB:RA.1CW SUPPLIES Check Total: Antunt Check # Type 33.17 11.31 125.68 783,234.00 783,234.00 96.06. 32.021 128.08 7.20 7.20 17.72 17.72 21.52 82.181 82.17. 7.06 7.05 249.82 46.00. 33.00 7;9.00, 172.81, 171.64 344.451 122.53: 26.32 148.85 00063208 00063209 00063145 00063210 00063211 00063212 00063213 South Tahoe P.U.D. TIU, MAY 25, 2006, 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REP 0 R T 05/19/2006-06/01/2006 P 9 2:54 PM - -req: ,-- -leg: GL JL - -1oc: CNSITE-- - -jcb: 361920 #J008 - -- ptng: aGo9 <1..07>1- j -repart Id: C Atiotmt CIEds # Type refa1lt Selection- Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: 1461,IW,RV,VH Vend= Nare 3 kxc cunt # Dapartment SEVE?SN, CHARLES SHARP,. IMEIY SHERVAN, TfIQ SIERRA CHEMICAL CD SIERRA ENVIRZWENIAL SIERRA NEVAIR CIASSIETMS SIERRA PACIFIC PURER SICK, ?I� INC • • SOUTH LAKE TALE, CITY OF SOUIHNEST CAS 20 -00 -3540 CORAL & ALME IISIRATTCN 10 -21 -6200 ALMINIS]17I CN 20 -21 -6200 ACMINISMITCN 10 -39 -6200 FINANCE 20 -39 -6200 FINANCE 10 -06 -4755 CaRA.JICNS 10 -07 -6110 IARATCRY 20 -01 -6052 USERSRUND REMIR 10 -00 -6740 COAL & ALNIINISIRATTCN 10 -00 -6330 COAL & ADMI IISIlZATTCN 20 -00 -6330 COAL &AEMINIS1RATIal 10 -07 -4760 LAM2A= 20 -07 -4760 LAECRAT3W. 10 -05 -8645 IIXIMINI' RE AIR 20 -00 -6350 GENERAL & AIIMINISIIRATICN 10 -00 -6350 CAL be ALYENIISIRPIIICN rescripticn CTIIat MISZELLPNE1S INOU E Check Total: TRA Check 'Ibtal: 'IRA TRA DI DM i e. H�Q�II flE N� �� v CN ��• CN Check Total: ChB& Total: Check Total: PIPE, C X/ PS, & NP LgES Check Total: SIREET LIGHTN3 EXPENSE FJ Fci is TY EI Ern IQIY Check Tbta1: I.AECRATCRY SUPPLIES LABORATCRY SUPPLIES Check Tbta1: CATCR &r fleck Total: =URAL MS NAILRAL CAS 1,500.00 1,500.00 00063214 MN i 118.15 118.15 236.30 00063215 MiI. 101.02 101.01 202.03 00063216 MAI I 4,426.70 4,426.70 00063217 Ma 380.00 380.00 00063218 NW 58.96 58.96 6.90 12,924.81 19,520.08 32,451.79 00063220 MAI 359 1200..52 151.11 00063221 IM 922.00 922.00 00063222 .Mg 233.17 64.37 00063219 MI c■ [D L 10 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 361920 REPORT 08 T_ I�� / %0� 0701 /20x006�t CK TEEL 25, p2006, 2:54 AEI j25�/0�6 C.�, Jtr -loc: C1�1SIZE- jcb. Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: Mital,RV,VH Defaoult C1- Selectiaz: �c3c � # 't va,� Mire �---= SWAIN, CARCL TRPA TAME EUJEPRINT 'DICE VAIIE' ELECIRIC SUPPLY 'IUSTIN LOCK ADD SAFE USAELLSECCK USFC 20 -37 -6200 10 -39 -6520 20 -39 -6520 20 -29 -7054 20 -29 -8401 20 -29 -7049 �C13 SYS EMS FINANCE maiNEERIILZ 20 -03 -6041 ELECIMALSHOP 10-01 -6042 LISERSEMDREEAIR 20 -02 -6042 PUMPS 10- 02- 6042 PUMPS . 20 -37 -4840 INFORANTBal SYSTEMS 20 -02 -6054 PUMPS 20 -29 -8401 Desc r iPticn Check rIbt l: PLE Il Check Total: SUPPLIES CIE& 'Dotal: 14A1ERUNE AL CUSICFER CE CENTER VMERLDIE, PAYVIM Chedc Tbta1 : EUIT.DIZS Checklbtal: GRCLITS GRCLICE MINIEMIZE DISTRICT DISTRICT 0 MPU IER SUPPLIES Check Total: M MVP Teas Total: QSIa ER SERVICE : prrc sit check # Type 297297 00063223 NW 110.78 110.76 221.54, 00063224 M'T 8.50 8.50 17.00 00063225 t/k1 140.08; 53.66 69.90 263.64: 00063226 W1 31.52'. 31.52 00063227 144 721.99 362.04 368.29 323.25 323.25 2,098.82! 00063229 NW 113.43 113.43 . 00063230 144 87,026.00 87,026.00 00063231 1.91 Saith Tie P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006- 06/01/2006 a 11 THU, MY 25, 2006, 2:54 FM - -req: SSA -- -leg: (L . L, - -1cc: tI'EI'1E-- - -dab: 361920 #7008 - -- prcg: M09 <1.07 >- -rnparrt id: C PC Default Selecticn: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check Types: M4,11147,RV,VH Ve i± r Mann Aaorxmt # Department U S DISTRICT CI7[17T VWROMPORAIICN VERIZCN 10 -28 -6650 DTPMW) VALLEY RANCH 20 -07 -4760 IABCRAICRY 10 -07 -4760 LAB RATCRY 10 -06 -4760 C RATICI15 10 -28 -6310 DIAMSD VALLEY RANCH WALTERS CCnSII3EITCN, K G 20 -29 -8574 �Il3 20 -00 -2605 GENERAL .& ALMINISIRATICN MIER ENVIRatiENT FE RATION 10 -07 -6250 LAB3?ATCRY 20 -07 -6250 L B:MO C 44E17CD III WESTE M NEIAIA SUPPLY HIE RCCX CC S RILTICN wrmacw OXYGEN SERVICE 20 -03 -6051 E ECIRICM SHOP 10 -03 -6051 P R TRICAL S-UP 10 -29 -8668 EIV 20 -01 -6073 INIFGRaND REPAIR 20 -02 -6054 PUMPS 10 -02 -6071 PCNISS 20 -02 -6071 REPS 20 -29 -8548 EN3INEER]N3 10 -02 -6071 PUMPS Descripticn Check Tbtal: 'MIMICRY SUPPLIES LAB RA'ICEff SUPPLIES LAB3?ATCRY SUPPLIES Check Tbtal: Check Tttal: WELL ECAYVIEW /1133R15 caw REDIE Check Tbtal: IXES a e a 1r CERTIFKATI Tbtal: PCN1P SIATICNS RN1P S'IP TONS MAIN CtN.IlDL PANEL, %VIP Check Tt tal : SNY-,LL SEEP SUPPLIES Check Total: WIRLN, IW 50 REIN TD BIGER Check Tbtal: •44•'■ 1. Is • ID. Mr, GDP SUPPLIES Pnrunt Check # Type 2,631.61 2,631.61 153.72 190.39 370.06 714.17 131.26 131.26 164,732.04 - 16,473.20 148,258.84 166.00 166.00 332.00 314.25 15.74 37.19 367.18 00063232 M4 00063233 M4 00063234 MI 00063235 M4 00063236 M4 00063237 M4 12.80 392.20 .44.21 44.20 493.41 00063238 161 574,180.70 574,180.70 17.50 00063239 NW South Tahoe P.U.D. 05/25/06 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS REPORT 05/19/2006- 06/01/2006 1}U, MY 25, 2006, 2:54 FM - -req: ,- - -leg: GL JL- -loc: C1 TIE-- - -jcb: 361920 #3008 -- -prop: CK509 <1.077>- -repart id: Default Selecticn: Check Stock ID: AP ; Check TIpes : NW, F-N, RV, VH Vendor- Name Amount # Departing 10 -04 -6041 10 -04 -6071 10 -07 -4760 10 -28 -6042 20 -02 -6071 20 -07 -4760 HEW NAINIENANZE HEAVY MINDENINCE LAECRATCRY DIPPENDIAIIEY RANCH AMPS IAECRATCRY DesariT i rn cm48 A rcunt Check # 'I)pe BU DIN S SEDP SUPPLIES LAB2RATCRY SUPPLIES 3OP SUPPLfSN�1 NIENIB E LABZRATORY SUPPLIES Check Tbtal: Graced Tbtal: 149.29 307.06 230.05 87.49 192.44 230.05 1,213.88 00063240 MW 1,854,651.90 South Tahoe Public Utility District General Manaeer R1charc:l H.50IPrlg Directors lorn Corn1:e Jarne5 R. Jone5 Mary Lou Mosl>acher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive · South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www.StpUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 a. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Rhonda McFarlane, Chief Financial Officer Richard Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT: Real Estate Negotiations REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct negotiators. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held to discuss real estate negotiations. Negotiating Parties: Board Ad Hoc Committee, General Manager, Assistant General Manager/Engineer, Chief Financial Officer, Under Negotiation: Terms and Price Property Identification: Lukins Water Company, 2031 West Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CATEGORY: Water CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES..llJ1.fr ~, NO -67- G8ner.al~naGer RIchard H. Solbrig South T a hoe Public Utility District Directors Tom Comte Jamlls R. Jonlls Mary Lou Mosbacher Duanll Wallacll Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive' South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150-7401 ' Phone 530 544-6474' Fax 530 541-0614' www.stpUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 b. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: Beth Jett, Kendall Pearce, and Pearce Family Trust dated 1-20-88 vs. South Tahoe Public Utility District, Cox & Cox Construction, Inc., a California Corporation, Nimbus Engineers, a Nevada Corporation and Does 1-100, inclusive, Civil Action No. PC 20050567, Superior Court, County of EI Dorado, State of California. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES ~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ ~ NO CATEGORY: Sewer -69- General Manage,. RIchard H. So/I:7rig South Tahoe Public Utility District Directors Tom Comte James R. Jones M.IIY Lou Mosl1acher Duane Wallacs Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive - South Lake Tahoe' CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530 541-0614- WWW.5tpud.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 c. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Rhonda McFarlane, Chief Financial Officer MEETING DATE: June 1. 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation: STPUD vs. ARCO, et al.. San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. 999128 REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code, Closed session may be held for conference with legal counsel. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES ,I1tHJ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO , CATEGORY: Water -71- (7ener.al~naeer Richard H. SolImg South Tahoe Public Utility District Directors rom Cornu James It Jones Mary Lou Mosbacher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 54+6474. Fax 530 541-0614. www.5tpud.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 d. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard H. Solbrig, General Manager Gary Kvistad, Legal Counsel MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Existing Litigation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. , DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: STPUD vs. 1442.92 Acres of Land in Alpine County, California; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Ca., Sacramento Division, Case No. CIV S-02- 0238 MCE JFM. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ NO CATEGORY: Sewer ,-73- c;6ner.al~anag8r RIchard H. 501l7rlg South Tahoe Public Utility District Directors Tom Comu JamefS R. Jones Mary Lou Mosbacher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive. South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474. Fax 530541-0614' www.stPUd.U5 BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 e. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard H. SOlbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: Meyers Landfill Site - United States of America vs. EI Dorado County and City of South Lake Tahoe and Third Party Defendants, Civil Action No. S-01-1520 LKK GGH, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: 'YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~ ~_ NO CATEGORY: Sewer -76- General Manag"" RIchard H. 50117r19 South Tahoe Public Utility District Directors Tom Comte James R. Jones Mary Lou Mosl7acher Duane Wallau Eric Schafer 1275 Meadow Crest Drive' South Lake Tahoe' CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474' Fax 530 541-0614. www.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 f. TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard SOlbrig, General Manager, Paul ~ciuto, Assistant General Manager/Engineer MEETING DATE: June t, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel- Anticipated Litigation (two cases) REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct legal counsel. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held for conference with legal counsel regarding anticipation of litigation. SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES-..&11L.- NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: ~S~O CATEGORY: -77- General Manal3er Richard H. 50117rit1 .South .Tahoe Public Utility District Directors rom Comu James R. Jones Mary Lou Mosbacher Duane Wallace Eric Schafer 1275 Me.:ldow Crest Drive - South Lake Tahoe' CA 96150-7401 Phone 530 544-6474 - Fax 530 541-0614- \AM'W.stpud.us BOARD AGENDA ITEM 15 g., TO: Board of Directors FROM: Richard Solbrig, General Manager MEETING DATE: June 1, 2006 ITEM - PROJECT NAME: Conference with Labor Negotiators REQUESTED BOARD ACTION: Direct negotiators DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 54957.6(a) of the California Government Code, Closed Session may be held regarding contract negotiations. Agency Negotiators: Richard Solbrig/General Manager, Rhonda McFarlane/Chief Financial Officer, Ross Johnson/Plant Operations Manager, Directors Wallace and Comte/Union Negotiations Ad Hoc Committee Employee Organizations: International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local 39; Agency/Employe~ Health Care Options Subcommittee SCHEDULE: COSTS: ACCOUNT NO: BUDGETED AMOUNT REMAINING: ATTACHMENTS: CONCURRENCE WITH REQUESTED ACTION: GENERAL MANAGER: YES~ NO CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: YES~NO CATEGORY: General -79-